DOCSLIB.ORG

Une 1991/$ 1.50 V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Une 1991/$ 1.50 V une 1991/$ 1.50 V r^ i ^ » v-^.V, 4 8fymU7(M Historic Decision To most Pennsylvania trout fishermen, and to many others, the names Spring Creek and Fisherman's Paradise are synonymous with quality trout fishing. The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission has deep roots in the Spring Creek Watershed, and to many employees the watershed is both their workplace and home. Three very important fish culture facilities are located on lands adjacent to Spring Creek. These include the Bellefonte trout production station and the Upper Spring Creek warm water/cool water propagation facility, and the combination trout produc­ tion station and world-renowned fisheries research station at Benner Spring. The Pleasant Gap Fish Culture Station is also located on the headwaters of the Logan Branch of Spring Creek, together with the headquarters of two of the Commission's largest Bureaus: Fisheries, and Property and Facilities Management. The H. R. Stackhouse School of Fishery Conservation and Watercraft Safety, which serves as the training center for Commission employees and volunteers, is also located adjacent to Spring Creek, together with a firearms training center for conser­ vation officer instruction. The best known section of Spring Creek is the world-famous Fisherman's Paradise, a specially regulated one-mile length of stream adjacent to the Bellefonte hatchery. Farther downstream, on lands owned by the Commission, is the Spring Creek Slalom Course, which is heavily used for training and recreation by kayak and canoe enthusiasts. The borough of Bellefonte maintains a trout exhibition area adjacent to the Tallyrand public park where the stream passes through the center of the commu­ Edward R. Miller, P.E. nity, and farther upstream the flowing waters are the center of attraction of the Executive Director College Township park in Houserville. Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission Spring Creek and its unique valley has been much abused over the years as human activities and heavy development have taken place on its watershed. It has been resilient, however, and because of the concerns and efforts of many it has been able to survive and maintain much of its high water quality and productive fishery habitat. Over the years the Commission has continuously sought and encouraged greater public control of Spring Creek, and today the Commonwealth is the largest single property owner on the stream. Just recently the Commission negotiated with the Allegheny Power System for title of Spring Creek and much of its adjacent banks from Bellefonte to Milesburg. This lengthy stretch is strong evidence of the Commission's long-standing efforts. The area includes Commission lands at the Paradise and the Bellefonte and Upper Spring Creek hatcheries, and Commonwealth lands under the control of the Pennsyl­ vania Department of Justice that are leased to the Commission. Other public park lands, together with several private property owner agreements and Penn State University lands, give even more public access to Spring Creek's banks. Recently, the stream was reclassified to High Quality Coldwater Fishery, which helps protect it from further degradation. Meanwhile, efforts currently under way to upgrade sewage treatment at two existing plants, coupled with accelerated efforts by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency to clean up toxic wastes at the Reutgers- Nease plant, are encouraging factors for the entire watershed. The Commission's long-standing and very close relationship with Spring Creek prompted the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission on April 13, 1992, to autho­ rize the staff to continue efforts to acquire other important sections of Spring Creek. If successful, these acquisitions will further extend public control of the Spring Creek corridor and guarantee that more of this unique natural resource will be protected and available for public enjoyment. It is an historic decision that merits everyone's support. Pennsylvania June 1992 Vol 61 No. 6 Fish & Boat Commission Pennsylvania William J. Sabatose President Brockport J. Wayne Yorks ANGLER The Keystone States Official Fishing Magazine ^^ Vice President Benton Success on Delayed-Harvest Waters by Ed Howey James S. Biery, Jr. The trout in delayed-harvest areas are no pushovers. Catching them Swatara requires applying these ideas 4 Marilyn A. Black Cochranton Big-Water Tactics, Small-Water Walleyes by Jim Crawford Ross J. Huhn Small-water walleye lakes dot Pennsylvania. Use these hints to cash in Saltsburg on this fishing 6 Paul J. Mahon Lake Arthur's Better Bass Fishing by Linda Steiner darks Green You probably know about the great bass fishing in Lake Arthur, but this T. T. Metzger. Jr. information can help you score more 8 Johnstown Howard E. Pflugfelder A Foam Cricket by Chauncy K. Lively New Cumberland Plenty of insects fall into trout streams in summer, but an insect's abundance doesn't mean that trout like to eat them. Trout do eat crickets, and they'll Leon Reed chase this imitation avidly 12 Hones dale The Changing Face of June Trout Fishing by Richard Tate Boating Advisory Board Most stocked Pennsylvania trout streams and even some so-called marginal Donald J. Little stocked trout waters harbor populations of trout all season long. Adapt your Chairman trout fishing tactics along these lines for maximum success 14 Philadelphia Summertime Smallies of the Lower Allegheny by JeffKnapp Clayton Buchanan The Allegheny River's 72 miles from near Freeport to Templeton, Pittsburgh Armstrong County, offer great smallmouth bass fishing. Let this information Martin P. Eisert help you get in on the action 16 Erie Judy Obert Choosing Line Color for Bass Fishing by Andy Cline Greentown This news may surprise you, but applying the know-how can increase Thaddeus Piotrowski your catches 20 Bloomsburg The Icthyophobe and the Angler—Can Their Love Survive? by Lynn Ernst Magazine Staff Falling love is wonderful. But please, let him be a golfer, a bowler or Editor—Art Michaels a hunter... ANYTHING but a fisherman 22 Art Director—Ted Walke Circulation—Eleanor Mutch Largemouth Bass Fishing in Northwest Pennsylvania by Mike Bleech Staff Assistant—Rose Ann Bartal Here's the lowdown on northwest Pennsylvania's best bigmouth Staff Assistant—Charlene Glisan action 23 Staff Assistant—Nita Galati On the Water with Dave Wolf "Baggage" 31 Pennsylvania Angler USSN0031-434X) is published monthly by the Pennsylvania Fish & Boal Commission. 3532 Walnut Street. Harrisburg, PA 17109. ©1992. Nothing in this magazine may be reprinted without The covers the written permission ol the Pennsylvania Fish &Boa( Commission. Subscription This month's front cover, photographed by Doug Stamm, suggests the kind of action you can rates: oneyear,$9;threeycars.$25;.singlecopiesare$1.50cach. Second class postage is paid at Harrisburg, PA. POSTMASTER: Send address have in June when bass season opens on the 13th. To help you find the best bass spots in northwest changes to: Pennsylvania Angler Circulation, Pennsylvania Fish Si Boal Pennsylvania, please turn to page 23, and to get the lowdown on fishing the lower Allegheny for Commission, P.O. Box 1673, Harrisburg. PA 17105-1673. For subscription and change of address, use above address. Please allow six weeks for processing. bass, see page 16. Lake Arthur, Butler County, is one of Pennsylvania's very best bass spots, and Send all other correspondence to: The Editor. Pennsylvania Angler, P.O. on page 8 we reveal the secrets to success on this waterway. Turn to page 20 for how-to-do-it in­ Box 1673, Harrisburg, PA 17105-1673. Editorial queries and contributions am welcome, hut must be accompanied by self-addressed, stamped envelopes. formation on bass fishing that may surprise you. Walleye anglers will want to check out page 6, Material accepted tor publication is subject to Pennsylvania Fish & Boat and trout fishermen can find useful material on pages 4 and 14. Fly tiers can follow along at their Commission standards and requirements lor editing and revising. Submissions are handled carefully, but the publisher assumes no responsibility for the vices on page 12 to tie a productive summertime trout offering. On page 22 you can read the true return or safety of submissions in his possession or in transit. The authors' story of how a marriage survives even though the guy's an avid fisherman. I bet the author's expe­ views, ideas and advice expressed in this magazine do not necessarily relied the opinion or official position of the Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission rience on the water beginning on page 31 is just like yours and mine. An installment of the popular or its staff. The Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission receives federal column "Notes from the Streams" appears on pages 28 and 29, and you might want to save this aid in sport fish restoration. Under appropriate federal acts, the U. S. Department ot the Interior prohibits discrimination on [he basis of race, color, national issue's back cover for reference and stash it in your fishing vest or tackle box. origin, age, sex or handicap. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire more information, please write to: The Office of Equal Opportunity. Department of the Interior, Washington. DC 2024(1. Success on Delayed- By June 15, trout season has ended for many Keystone State creel limit stays at three nine-inchers daily. The rules are anglers, but not for those who fish with artificial lures or flies. clearly set forth in the summary book and in the placards along For them another opening day is at hand because that's when regulated stretches. catch-and-release regulations are lifted on waters designated as Stocking rates for regulated sections are generous, 150 fish delayed harvest. per acre, with the first plant taking place as early in March as Delayed-harvest waters? If the term doesn't ring a bell, possible and the second around the middle of May.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Katmai National Park and Preserve (Alaska)
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resources Program Center Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Katmai National Park and Preserve (Alaska) Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR—2007/372 Cover photo: Glacier emerging from the slopes of Mt Douglas toward the Katmai coastline. August 2005. Photo: S.Nagorski 2 Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Katmai National Park and Preserve (Alaska) Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2007/372 Sonia Nagorski Environmental Science Program University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK 99801 Ginny Eckert Biology Program University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK 99801 Eran Hood Environmental Science Program University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK 99801 Sanjay Pyare Environmental Science Program University of Alaska Southeast Juneau, AK 99801 This report was prepared under Task Order J9W88050014 of the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (agreement CA90880008) Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center 1201 Oakridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 June 2007 U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 3 The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade in Seahorses and Other Syngnathids in Countries Outside Asia (1998-2001)
    ISSN 1198-6727 Fisheries Centre Research Reports 2011 Volume 19 Number 1 Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Canada Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) 1 Edited by Amanda C.J. Vincent, Brian G. Giles, Christina A. Czembor and Sarah J. Foster Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1) 181 pages © published 2011 by The Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia 2202 Main Mall Vancouver, B.C., Canada, V6T 1Z4 ISSN 1198-6727 1 Cite as: Vincent, A.C.J., Giles, B.G., Czembor, C.A., and Foster, S.J. (eds). 2011. Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001). Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1). Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia [ISSN 1198-6727]. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 19(1) 2011 Trade in seahorses and other syngnathids in countries outside Asia (1998-2001) edited by Amanda C.J. Vincent, Brian G. Giles, Christina A. Czembor and Sarah J. Foster CONTENTS DIRECTOR ’S FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Methods ...........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aphanomyces Invadans R NUMBER: R6979 PROGRAMME: Aquaculture Research Programme (ARP) PROGRAMME MANAGER (INSTITUTION): Prof J.F
    DFID Applied studies on epizootic ulcerative syndrome Final Report February 2001 Project R6979 of the Aquaculture Research Programme of the Department for International Development of the United Kingdom This document is an output from a project funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries. The views expressed are not necessarily those of DFID. Hard copies of this report can be obtained from: ARP Manager Institute of Aquaculture University of Stirling Stirling FK9 4LA Scotland, UK Institute of Aquaculture University of Stirling, Scotland Aquatic Animal Health Research Institute Department of Fisheries, Thailand PROJECT COMPLETION SUMMARY SHEET Sheet Completed 28 February 2001 TITLE OF PROJECT: Applied studies on EUS - The ecology, immunogenicity and treatment of Aphanomyces invadans R NUMBER: R6979 PROGRAMME: Aquaculture Research Programme (ARP) PROGRAMME MANAGER (INSTITUTION): Prof J.F. Muir PROGRAMME PURPOSE: Productive benefits of aquatic resources for poor people generated through improved knowledge of aquaculture processes and their management PRODUCTION SYSTEM: Land/Water Interface BENEFICIARIES: Asian freshwater fish farmers TARGET INSTITUTIONS: AAHRI, FRI, BAU, CARE-LIFE, CIFA, BFAR, FDD, FRTI, RIA1 GEOGRAPHIC FOCUS: Southeast and South Asia Planned Actual START DATE: 1 July 1997 1 July 1997 FINISH DATE: 31 December 2000 28 February 2001 TOTAL COST: £250,613 £248,613 1. Project purpose: To generate the information needed for the formulation of strategies to contain EUS; and to develop and introduce improved prophylactic and therapeutic treatments to provide fish farmers with a means of reducing losses due to EUS. 2. Outputs: Some modifications were made to the original logical framework in January 1999.
    [Show full text]
  • Bonneville Tule Fall Chinook
    HATCHERY AND GENETIC MANAGEMENT PLAN (HGMP) Hatchery Program: Bonneville Hatchery Tule Fall Chinook Salmon Program Species or Tule Fall Chinook Salmon Hatchery Stock: Stock 14 Agency/Operator: Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife Watershed and Region: Lower Columbia River Date Submitted: May 10, 2016 First Update Submitted: October 18, 2017 Date Last Updated: October 17, 2017 1 SECTION 1. GENERAL PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1.1) Name of hatchery or program. Bonneville Hatchery, tule fall Chinook Salmon program. 1.2) Species and population (or stock) under propagation, and ESA status. Tule fall Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha (stock 14) is under this propagation program. Several races and populations of Chinook Salmon produced within the sub-basins of the lower Columbia River are part of the Lower Columbia River Chinook Salmon Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU)), which is listed as “Threatened” under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The early-run tule race of fall Chinook Salmon produced at Bonneville Hatchery is not considered as part of the ESU, and therefore, not listed under the ESA. 1.3) Responsible organization and individuals. Lead Contact: Name (and title): Scott Patterson, Fish Propagation Program Manager Agency or Tribe: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Address: 4304 Fairview Industrial Drive SE, Salem, OR 97302 Telephone: (503) 947-6218 Fax: (503) 947-6202/6203 Email: [email protected] Onsite Hatchery Contact: Name (and title): Greg Davis, Bonneville Hatchery Manger Agency or Tribe: Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Address: 70543 NE Herman Loop Telephone: (541) 374-8393 Fax: (541) 374-8090 Email: [email protected] Other agencies, Tribes, co-operators, or organizations involved, including contractors, and extent of involvement in the program: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) provides funding for Bonneville Hatchery tule fall Chinook program.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish in Renaissance Dietary Theory Ken Albala University of the Pacific, [email protected]
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons College of the Pacific aF culty Books and Book All Faculty Scholarship Chapters 1-1-1998 Fish in Renaissance Dietary Theory Ken Albala University of the Pacific, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cop-facbooks Part of the Food Security Commons, History Commons, and the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Albala, K. (1998). Fish in Renaissance Dietary Theory. In Harlan Walker (Eds.), Fish: Food from the Waters (9–19). Totnes, Devon, England: Oxford Symposium/Prospect https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/cop-facbooks/32 This Contribution to Book is brought to you for free and open access by the All Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of the Pacific aF culty Books and Book Chapters by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fish in Renaissance Dietary Theory Ken Albala It is clear that the rising consumption of fish in recent decades can be ascribed in large measure to the favorable verdict of physicians and nutritionists. Fish offers a nutritional profile that fits in well with current dietary principles. Was this not also the case with past nutritional theory? Did the advice of physicians formerly dissuade consumers from eating fish, so that a modern revival was required? This paper will attempt to answer that question by examining European nutritional theory from the invention of printing to the mid-seventeenth century to establish the possible origin of fish aversion. The story, however, is not simply that past physicians banned fish from a healthy diet; the situation is far more complicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquaculture in Africa = La Pisciculture En Afrique
    459 Chapitre 22 AQUACULTURE IN AFRICA LA PISCICULTURE EN AFRIQUE P. B. N Jackson 1 - INTRODUCTION Though aquaculture is of considerable antiquity especially in the Far East, and even though the first record of fish in ponds is from an Egyptian bas-relief of yet greater age @mignon, 1962 ; Balarin & Hatton, 1979), fish farming in Afiica is an activity of very recent origin. This is because until recently, human populations in Afiica were small enough for their needs to be met by the natural reproduction of fish, without having to breed and grow them artificially. SO a tradition of the culture of fish and other aquatic organisms never became established in Aftica as it did in the Orient. However though fish were not held in captivity, practices such as the trapping of fish behind fentes or weirs, which are widespread in many areas, and espe- cially the concentrating of fish in lagoons or floodplains in Benin by means of «acadjas» or fish-parks made of brushwood (Welcomme, 1971), are certainly steps in this direction. Given time, therefore, a fish culture tradition may have evolved independently in Africa, but events were overtaken and the process hastened by the importation of culture techniques from elsewhere. Such importations generally began with the techniques of breeding sport angling fish, parti- cularly trout and vatious bass species,also the «Sandre» (Stizostedion Iucioperca into Morocco (J. Arrignon pers. com.), for sport fishing, but even the earliest hatcheries for this purpose are less than a hundred years old. The breeding of fish for food is still more recent and correlated with the great increases in human populations, whose impact, especially the need to provide more food, only began to be felt well into the twentieth Century.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes of the World
    Fishes of the World Fishes of the World Fifth Edition Joseph S. Nelson Terry C. Grande Mark V. H. Wilson Cover image: Mark V. H. Wilson Cover design: Wiley This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be createdor extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Late 17Th Century AD Faunal Remains from the Dutch 'Fort Frederik Hendrik'
    10. ARCH. VOL. 18 (2ª):Maquetación 1 25/9/09 11:43 Página 159 Archaeofauna 18 (2009): 159-184 Late 17th century AD faunal remains from the Dutch ‘Fort Frederik Hendrik’ at Mauritius (Indian Ocean) NOUD PETERS1, WIM VAN NEER2, SOFIE DEBRUYNE3 & SEM PETERS4 1Markt 11, 5492 AA Sint-Oedenrode. The Netherlands. 2Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium and Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Laboratory of Animal Biodiversity and Systematics, Ch. Deberiotstraat 32, B-3000 Leuven. Belgium. 3Flemish Heritage Institute, Phoenix building, Koning Albert II-laan 19 box 5, B-1210 Brussels. Belgium. 4BAAC (Bureau for Building History, Archaeology, Architectural and Cultural History), Graaf van Solmsweg 103, 5222 BS, ‘s Hertogenbosch. The Netherlands. [email protected] (Received 24 April 2009; Revised 27 May 2009; Accepted 2 June 2009) ABSTRACT: The fauna is described from a refuse layer, excavated at Fort Frederik Hendrik on the island of Mauritius and dating to the last quarter of the 17th century AD. The animal remains enable the reconstruction of the food procurement strategies of the Dutch inhabitants of the fort and document the fauna at a time when the island’s original fauna had apparently already suf- fered heavily from human interference and from the negative impact of introduced species. The animal remains do not include any bones from the dodo, or other endemic birds, and neither is there evidence for the exploitation of the large, endemic terrestrial tortoises, also now extinct. Dugong, which are locally extinct nowadays, and marine turtles were also exploited as food, but the major meat providers were the introduced mammals: cattle, pigs, and especially, goat and Java deer.
    [Show full text]
  • Instream 7: Instream Flow Assessment and Management Model For
    InSTREAM 7: Instream flow assessment and management model for stream trout In press at: Rivers Research and Applications August, 2021 Running title: InSTREAM 7 Salmonid Population Model for Instream Flow Assessment Steven F. Railsback Humboldt State University, Department of Mathematics, and Lang Railsback and Associates, Arcata, CA, 95521 Daniel Ayllón Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), Faculty of Biology, Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Madrid, Spain Bret C. Harvey USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 1700 Bayview Drive, Arcata, CA Corresponding author: Steven Railsback, [email protected]. 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Development of inSTREAM and related models has been funded by the U.S. Forest Service, Environmental Protection Agency, Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of Reclamation; the Electric Power Research Institute; and the Pacific Gas and Electric and Southern California Edison companies. Development of inSTREAM 7 was funded in part by the U.S. Forest Service’s Pacific Southwest Research Station and by the River Ecology & Management Research Group of Karlstad University and Vattenfall AB (Sweden). 2 ABSTRACT Mechanistic, individual-based simulation models have been used for >25 years to overcome well-known limitations of “habitat suitability” models. InSTREAM 7 is the latest of our individual-based models for predicting effects of flow and temperature regimes on stream salmonid populations. Unlike PHABSIM (or other methods based on habitat “quality,” e.g., as net rate of energy intake), inSTREAM mechanistically represents specific effects of flow and temperature on all life stages, and how those effects combine into testable predictions of population measures such as abundance, relative abundance of multiple trout species, and persistence.
    [Show full text]
  • Instream Flow Assessment and Management Model for Stream Trout
    Received: 7 April 2021 Revised: 27 July 2021 Accepted: 28 July 2021 DOI: 10.1002/rra.3845 RESEARCH ARTICLE InSTREAM 7: Instream flow assessment and management model for stream trout Steven F. Railsback1 | Daniel Ayllon 2 | Bret C. Harvey3 1Department of Mathematics, Humboldt State University and Lang Railsback and Associates, Abstract Arcata, California, USA Mechanistic, individual-based simulation models have been used for >25 years to 2 Faculty of Biology, Department of overcome well-known limitations of “habitat suitability” models. InSTREAM 7 is the Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid (UCM), latest of our individual-based models for predicting the effects of flow and tempera- Madrid, Spain ture regimes on stream salmonid populations. Unlike PHABSIM (or other methods 3Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA “ ” Forest Service, Arcata, California, USA based on habitat quality, e.g., as net rate of energy intake), inSTREAM mechanisti- cally represents specific effects of flow and temperature on all life stages, and how Correspondence Steven F. Railsback, Department of those effects combine into testable predictions of population measures such as abun- Mathematics, Humboldt State University and dance, relative abundance of multiple trout species, and persistence. InSTREAM 7 is Lang Railsback and Associates, Arcata, CA 95521, USA. the first version to also represent the daily light cycle (dawn, day, dusk, and night) Email: [email protected] and how feeding, predation risk, and individual behavior vary among light phases. An Funding information example assessment illustrates the importance of inSTREAM's multiple mechanisms: River Ecology & Management Research Group predicted trout population response to flow and temperature regimes depended on of Karlstad University and Vattenfall AB (Sweden); Pacific Southwest Research Station, the effects of sub-lethal temperatures on feeding behavior and effects of tempera- U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline to Understand and Reduce Acoustic Impact on Biodiversity
    Biodiversità Mediterranea – Internazionale Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Forestali BIO/06 Mining extraction in the ocean depths: a baseline to understand and reduce acoustic impact on biodiversity PhD CANDIDATE PhD COORDINATOR MANUELA MAURO PROF.SSA MARIA ANTONIETTA GERMANA’ SUPERVISOR CO-SUPERVISOR PROF.SSA MIRELLA VAZZANA PROF.SSA ISABEL PÉREZ ARJONA PROF. EDUARDO JORGE BELDA PÉREZ DOTT.SALVATORE MAZZOLA CICLO XXXII 2020 2 To my mom, to her dream began reality 3 4 Abstract Throughout history, man has exploited the earth's mineral resources for its survival and for technological development without regard for their regeneration. Given the growth of the world population and given the fall in resources, man started looking for new deposits, which were found in 1960s in the ocean depths. Humankind then began to consider extracting minerals from these deposits and this gave origin to Deep Sea Mining (DSM). The consequences of mining activities in the deep sea are not entirely known and the effects can be varied: noise pollution, light pollution, chemical pollution, habitat destruction, habitat fragmentation and the loss of species which we consider the basis of many life systems. The acoustic impact of these activities could have significant consequences on marine species; nevertheless, this has been the most overlooked issue to date. The aim of this PhD project was to provide baseline knowledge of possible acoustic impacts of DSM on biodiversity before mining begins. In order to do this, the PhD project was organised into 3 different stages. First, during an indoor experiment, the biochemical responses of invertebrates Arbacia lixula and Mytilus galloprovincialis subjected to acoustic stress were analysed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dismantling Media Produced Fear Toward Predators
    Running head: PREDATOR RELATIONS IN THE MEDIA i Dismantling media produced fear toward predators Nicole Pavla Schafer University of Otago 2011 PREDATOR RELATIONS IN THE MEDIA ii Abstract Top predators like the shark were once revered as guardian deities - now they are demonized as terrorizing killers. While once respected and worshipped they are now considered to be the epitome of evil and malevolence. This transformation in our emotional response and perception is due in large part to the media. The media creates fear with their use of framing, images, and agendas that emphasize the sensational. Fear is a motivating force and a compelling emotion used by the media to increase ratings and keep the reader or viewer interested. Predators are receiving negative publicity and it is impairing conservation efforts launched on their behalf. A change in the media’s treatment of predators and a significant change in their audience’s expectations may be the only way to develop a more realistic and appropriate public attitude toward predators. This thesis will explore this predicament by creating an understanding of what fear is, how it is generated, and how the media uses it, before suggesting solutions that might decrease sensationalism and increase the factual content of media reports. The creative component of the thesis, the twenty-five minute film Tangled Waters, illustrates how the small community of Dunedin, New Zealand brought an end to a forty-year practice of shark netting. In 1967, Dunedin placed anti-shark nets off three beaches to protect beachgoers from great white sharks. Ratepayers came together and campaigned to not only save themselves $38,000 a year of council spending, but also to positively support their local marine wildlife.
    [Show full text]