Women, Weaponry and Warfare

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Women, Weaponry and Warfare Women, weaponry and warfare A multidisciplinary study of the use of weapons by women in Dynastic Egypt Number of Volumes: 2 Volume 1 of 2 Rebecca Angharad Dean M.Phil University of York Archaeology March 2013 ii Abstract This thesis is a detailed study of the utilisation of weaponry by ancient Egyptian women during the Dynastic Period. This work incorporates extended literature reviews, including a detailed discussion of several examples of women utilising weaponry and taking part in warfare in societies outside of Dynastic Egypt, an analysis of feminist and gender-based approaches to the subject, an examination of women within ancient Egyptian society, and a review of the specific weapons associated with these women. Detailed experimental archaeology also forms part of the thesis research in order to test the effectiveness or ineffectiveness of the specific weaponry when utilised by both men and women. In addition to the experimental work, a comparative discussion of examples of weapons’ trauma on ancient Egyptian remains is carried out. The thesis concludes with the discussion of research carried out and the potential for future work, and the conclusions drawn from all aspects of the thesis research. A catalogue of unpublished ancient Egyptian weaponry in the collections of the Harrogate Royal Pump Room Museum and the Yorkshire Museum in York is also included as an Appendix to the thesis. Volume One iii Contents Volume One: Abstract – ii Acknowledgments – v Declaration – vi Introduction – 1 Chapter One - Women and Weapons Outside of Ancient Egypt – 9 Chapter Two - A Feminist Approach in Egyptian Archaeology – 51 Chapter Three - Literature Review: Warfare and Women in ancient Egypt – 99 Chapter Four - Literature Review: Ancient Egyptian Weaponry – 151 Chapter Five - Experimental Archaeology – 186 Chapter Six - Experimental Archaeology: Comparative Discussion – 210 Chapter Seven – Discussion – 235 Conclusion – 252 Volume Two: Appendix – 3 Bibliography – 39 List of figures – 61 Chapter One Figures – Women and Weapons Outside of Ancient Egypt – 71 Chapter Two Figures – A Feminist Approach in Egyptian Archaeology – 75 Chapter Three Figures – Literature Review: Warfare and Women in ancient Egypt – 84 Volume One iv Chapter Four Figures – Literature Review: Ancient Egyptian Weaponry – 101 Chapter Five Figures – Experimental Archaeology – 124 Chapter Six Figures – Experimental Archaeology: Comparative Discussion – 161 Chapter Seven Figures – Discussion – 184 Appendix Figures – 190 Volume One v Acknowledgments First I must thank Professor Joann Fletcher and Professor Terry O’Connor for their assistance and support. Professor Fletcher inspired me to continue my research and was always ready with astute advice on my thesis. Her encouragement and her boundless enthusiasm have kept this project on track over the last four and a half years. Professor O’Connor’s guidance, optimism and support have been invaluable to me during the writing of this thesis. I am indebted to Dr Stephen Buckley for all of his advice and encouragement, and his assistance with the experimental work. I am also grateful to Kate Fletcher for her help with the khopesh experiments. Thanks are also due to Neil Burridge, who manufactured the wonderful weaponry that was used for the experimental archaeology, and whose advice and enthusiasm for the project inspired me further. I am also indebted to Thom Richardson of the Royal Armouries Leeds for his advice on the utilisation of the weaponry. I would also like to thank Professor Loveday Alexander of the University of Sheffield for all her advice, encouragement, and incredibly useful suggestions. Thanks also go to Lucy Wilson and Gemma Doherty for their constant support, and a belief in me and my research. They have kept me going over the last four and a half years. Finally, a huge debt of gratitude is due to my wonderful parents and my sister, for encouraging my interest in Egyptian Archaeology all those years ago, for supporting my decision to continue my research to a doctoral level, and for always lending me their help and advice whenever it was needed. Without them, none of this would have been possible, and I am forever in their debt. Volume One vi Declaration I declare that this thesis has been written by myself, and the work contained therein has not been presented anywhere else. Volume One 1 Introduction There can be no argument that warfare in ancient Egypt is a well-studied subject. There has been a long fascination with the wars conducted within early societies and ancient Egypt is no exception. Research has been wide-ranging, and certain aspects of ancient Egyptian warfare have been examined comprehensively as have the potential reasons why the Egyptians went to war and the structure and composition of the ancient Egyptian military (e.g. Shaw, I. (1991) Egyptian Warfare and Weapons). There has also been a great deal of research undertaken into specific military encounters such as the Battle of Kadesh (e.g. Goedicke, H. (1966) ‘Considerations on the Battle of Ḳadesh’, The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 52, 71-80; Epstein, C. (1963) ‘That Wretched Enemy of Kadesh’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 22 (4), 242-246), together with detailed studies of the various weapons in use throughout the Dynastic period. In 2009 I completed an MA dissertation (Dean 2008) which examined one type of ancient Egyptian weaponry, the mace, in relation to women in Egyptian society, the choice of weapon based on the size of an MA project and the opportunity to study the unpublished selection of ancient mace-heads within the collection of Harrogate Museums and arts. The MA dissertation was a springboard for this doctoral thesis, in which all the arguably functional weapons associated with women in the Dynastic Period are studied. This subject has not been as thoroughly examined as other aspects of Egyptian archaeology, with previous studies of warfare mainly focussed on male society. The period selected for study begins with the Early Dynastic Period (1st Dynasty, c.3100 BC) through to the end of the Saite Period (26th Dynasty, 525 BC). A small selection of Predynastic examples are also included, mostly relating to the museum cataloguing carried out as part of this research. The Persian, Ptolemaic and Roman periods are excluded, since the many variations in weaponry present at these times range far beyond the scope of a PhD thesis. One important point to note is that female warriors or at least women bearing arms were not necessarily prolific in ancient Egyptian society. What this thesis aims to Volume One 2 demonstrate is that such women did exist at various times, and although not customarily part of the Egyptian military, could adopt militaristic behaviours and styling in some circumstances. These examples are frequently linked to demonstrations of power and the display of a particular image relating to pharaonic status. This thesis also aims to highlight that women were physically able to use the weapons then available, meaning that that weapons associated with such women should not be automatically be dismissed as ‘token’ or ‘symbolic’. The evidence examined includes burial goods, literature and artistic portrayals supported by experimental archaeology. The experiments carried out as part of this thesis also demonstrate that women were able to wield the weapons with which they were buried, and were shown utilising in artistic portrayals and described as such in literary texts; these are assessed in detail in this thesis. Where possible, the sites and provenance of the images and statuary have been cited, although there is often a lack of provenance with several of the examples discussed, which can limit to a certain extent the discussion of possible socio-historical and cultural contexts. Whereas the initial subject of this thesis (‘Women and Weapons’) may seem a little simplistic, the in-depth discussion of the women themselves and their apparent exclusion from the archaeological record provides the theoretical sections of this thesis. The examination of their omission from the discourse of Egyptology, deliberately or otherwise, raises the matter of sexual politics within archaeology which is of huge importance to this thesis. Therefore an engagement with feminist and gender theory within archaeology addresses these issues, utilising the work of Roberta Gilchrist, Griselda Pollock, Judith Butler, and Lynn Meskell. The concept and theoretical position of so-called ‘Third Wave Feminism’ is also considered in relation to its potential impact on the study of Egyptian archaeology. The omission of women from the archaeological and historical record of Egyptian archaeology relates in large part to the lack of gender studies in Egyptian archaeology and the absence of gendered archaeology before the 1970s. Indeed, archaeology has long ignored those categories of individuals within the Volume One 3 archaeological record that “do not conform to masculine ideals” (Baker 1997, 184). This means that there are certain sections of a cultural society that become ‘invisible’ within the archaeological record, such as women, children, the elderly (Baker 1997, 184), and those who do not conform to what some archaeologists might regard to be ‘gender norms’, including those who appear to have cross-gender or third-gender roles (discussed in more detail later on in this thesis). Work by Hjørungdal in the 1990s addresses some of these issues, particularly the archaeological tradition where biological sex of burial is determined
Recommended publications
  • 2012: Providence, Rhode Island
    The 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Research Center in Egypt April 27-29, 2012 Renaissance Providence Hotel Providence, RI Photo Credits Front cover: Egyptian, Late Period, Saite, Dynasty 26 (ca. 664-525 BCE) Ritual rattle Glassy faience; h. 7 1/8 in Helen M. Danforth Acquisition Fund 1995.050 Museum of Art Rhode Island School of Design, Providence Photography by Erik Gould, courtesy of the Museum of Art, Rhode Island School of Design, Providence. Photo spread pages 6-7: Conservation of Euergates Gate Photo: Owen Murray Photo page 13: The late Luigi De Cesaris conserving paintings at the Red Monastery in 2011. Luigi dedicated himself with enormous energy to the suc- cess of ARCE’s work in cultural heritage preservation. He died in Sohag on December 19, 2011. With his death, Egypt has lost a highly skilled conservator and ARCE a committed colleague as well as a devoted friend. Photo: Elizabeth Bolman Abstracts title page 14: Detail of relief on Euergates Gate at Karnak Photo: Owen Murray Some of the images used in this year’s Annual Meeting Program Booklet are taken from ARCE conservation projects in Egypt which are funded by grants from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The Chronique d’Égypte has been published annually every year since 1925 by the Association Égyptologique Reine Élisabeth. It was originally a newsletter but rapidly became an international scientific journal. In addition to articles on various aspects of Egyptology, papyrology and coptology (philology, history, archaeology and history of art), it also contains critical reviews of recently published books.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Two Recent Theories Concerning the Narmer Palette1
    Eras Edition 8, November 2006 – http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/eras An Evaluation of Two Recent Theories Concerning the Narmer Palette1 Benjamin P. Suelzle (Monash University) Abstract: The Narmer Palette is one of the most significant and controversial of the decorated artefacts that have been recovered from the Egyptian Protodynastic period. This article evaluates the arguments of Alan R. Schulman and Jan Assmann, when these arguments dwell on the possible historicity of the palette’s decorative features. These two arguments shall be placed in a theoretical continuum. This continuum ranges from an almost total acceptance of the historical reality of the scenes depicted upon the Narmer Palette to an almost total rejection of an historical event or events that took place at the end of the Naqada IIIC1 period (3100-3000 BCE) and which could have formed the basis for the creation of the same scenes. I have adopted this methodological approach in order to establish whether the arguments of Assmann and Schulman have any theoretical similarities that can be used to locate more accurately the palette in its appropriate historical and ideological context. Five other decorated stone artefacts from the Protodynastic period will also be examined in order to provide historical comparisons between iconography from slightly earlier periods of Egyptian history and the scenes of royal violence found upon the Narmer Palette. Introduction and Methodology Artefacts of iconographical importance rarely survive intact into the present day. The Narmer Palette offers an illuminating opportunity to understand some of the ideological themes present during the political unification of Egypt at the end of the fourth millennium BCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In
    Department of World Cultures University of Helsinki Helsinki Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs The Ptolemaic Family in the Encomiastic Poems of Callimachus Iiro Laukola ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XV, University Main Building, on the 23rd of September, 2016 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2016 © Iiro Laukola 2016 ISBN 978-951-51-2383-1 (paperback.) ISBN 978-951-51-2384-8 (PDF) Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 Abstract The interaction between Greek and Egyptian cultural concepts has been an intense yet controversial topic in studies about Ptolemaic Egypt. The present study partakes in this discussion with an analysis of the encomiastic poems of Callimachus of Cyrene (c. 305 – c. 240 BC). The success of the Ptolemaic Dynasty is crystallized in the juxtaposing of the different roles of a Greek ǴdzȅǻǽǷȏȄ and of an Egyptian Pharaoh, and this study gives a glimpse of this political and ideological endeavour through the poetry of Callimachus. The contribution of the present work is to situate Callimachus in the core of the Ptolemaic court. Callimachus was a proponent of the Ptolemaic rule. By reappraising the traditional Greek beliefs, he examined the bicultural rule of the Ptolemies in his encomiastic poems. This work critically examines six Callimachean hymns, namely to Zeus, to Apollo, to Artemis, to Delos, to Athena and to Demeter together with the Victory of Berenice, the Lock of Berenice and the Ektheosis of Arsinoe. Characterized by ambiguous imagery, the hymns inspect the ruptures in Greek thought during the Hellenistic age.
    [Show full text]
  • Print and Web Resources (PDF, 191KB)
    Print and Web Resources GENERAL RESOuRCES PBS. The Time of the Lincolns. www.pbs.org/ wgbh/amex/lincolns/ J. Paul Getty Museum. “The Elements of Art.” www.getty.edu/education/for_teachers/ Wilson, Jackie Napolean. Hidden Witness: building_lessons/elements.html African-American Images from the Dawn of Photography to the Civil War. New York: J. Paul Getty Museum. “Explore Art.” St. Martin’s Press, 2000. www.getty.edu/art/gettyguide/ Metropolitan Museum of Art. “Timeline of Art Celebration and Satire History.” www.metmuseum.org/toah/ Berman, Patricia G. James Ensor: Christ’s Entry Teaching Tolerance. www.tolerance.org into Brussels in 1889. Getty Museum Studies on Art. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Museum, 2002. Breaking the Chains, Rising Out of Circumstances Center for History and New Media, George Mason University. Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: BBC. “Ancient History: Romans.” www.bbc.co.uk/ Exploring the French Revolution. chnm.gmu. history/ancient/romans edu/revolution/ Bolster, W. Jeffrey. Soldiers, Sailors, Slaves, and France in Australia. “Emblems and symbols of the Ships: The Civil War Photographs of Henry P. French Republic.” www.ambafrance-au.org/ Moore. Concord: New Hampshire Historical spip.php?article468 Society, 1999. PBS. Freedom: A History of US. www.pbs.org/ National Gallery of Art. “Marriage A-la-Mode: 4. wnet/historyofus/ The Toilette.” www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi- bin/WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/ PBS. Napoleon. www.pbs.org/empires/napoleon/ wa/work?workNumber=ng116 home.html National Gallery of Art. “Princess Rákóczi.” ReadWriteThink. “Satirical Techniques www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi-bin/ Definitions.” www.readwritethink.org/lesson_ WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/wa/ images/lesson936/SatiricalTechniques.pdf work?workNumber=ng3883 Waldron, Ann.
    [Show full text]
  • Was the Function of the Earliest Writing in Egypt Utilitarian Or Ceremonial? Does the Surviving Evidence Reflect the Reality?”
    “Was the function of the earliest writing in Egypt utilitarian or ceremonial? Does the surviving evidence reflect the reality?” Article written by Marsia Sfakianou Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom..........................2 How writing began.........................................................................................................4 Scopes of early Egyptian writing...................................................................................6 Ceremonial or utilitarian? ..............................................................................................7 The surviving evidence of early Egyptian writing.........................................................9 Bibliography/ references..............................................................................................23 Links ............................................................................................................................23 Album of web illustrations...........................................................................................24 1 Map of Egypt. Late Predynastic Period-Early Dynastic (Grimal, 1994) Chronology of Predynastic period, Thinite period and Old Kingdom (from the appendix of Grimal’s book, 1994, p 389) 4500-3150 BC Predynastic period. 4500-4000 BC Badarian period 4000-3500 BC Naqada I (Amratian) 3500-3300 BC Naqada II (Gerzean A) 3300-3150 BC Naqada III (Gerzean B) 3150-2700 BC Thinite period 3150-2925 BC Dynasty 1 3150-2925 BC Narmer, Menes 3125-3100 BC Aha 3100-3055 BC
    [Show full text]
  • Hotep 0059A May-Jun21.Pdf
    The newsletter of The Southampton HOTEP Issue 59: May-June 2021 Ancient Egypt Society Review of May meeting Other well-known objects found at the temple site were the large and small May’s lecture was given by Liam copper statues form the sixth dynasty. The McNamara on ‘Exploring the Dynastic larger one is inscribed for Pepi I but the Town and Temple at Hierakonpolis.’ smaller, which was found inside the torso of Liam is the Lisa and Bernard Selz Curator for the larger, is not. It has generally been Ancient Egypt and Sudan at the Ashmolean thought to be the son of Pepi I, Merenre. Museum and Director of the Griffith Institute However, Liam said that the pair is now at the University of Oxford. He is also the thought to be related to the Pepi I’s Heb Assistant Director of the Ashmolean’s Sed, with the smaller one representing the Expedition to Hierakonpolis and Elkab, and reborn king. his experience with this expedition was the focus of his talk. Liam began by showing a map of the site which is to the north of Edfu and on the west bank of the Nile. The ancient Egyptian name for the site was Nekhen and on the opposite bank is Elkab. The first major excavations on the town site were undertaken by Frederick Green and James Quibell, between 1897-9. It was during this excavation that the Main Deposit was discovered. This assemblage of ritual and votive objects, which included the Narmer palette, was referred to by Green as ‘Holy Rubbish’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functionality of the Mace When Associated with Women in the Dynastic Period
    Women and Weapons in Ancient Egypt The functionality of the mace when associated with women in the Dynastic Period Rebecca Dean, The University of York, [email protected] Project Background The Experiment Continued Mace-head from female Upper part of east face of burial at Abydos, Hatshepsut’s Karnak North bottom left corner (Peet obelisk. The female pharaoh 1914, Pl. III). Hatshepsut is depicted holding a mace in the bottom right corner (Stevenson Smith 1942, 48). Harrogate mace-head displaying The visible cut made by the conical Damage to the conical mace- similar damage to that sustained mace-head on pig head number three. head from hitting the pig head. by the mace in the experimental Photo courtesy of Dr J. Fletcher. Photo courtesy of Dr J. Fletcher. work (Dean 2009, 92). The pig head struck with the with the globular mace-head appeared to sustain little damage, though it was possible to feel a slight crack in the skull through the skin. The pig head that The mace is a weapon that has endured throughout Egyptian history, from Predynastic times was struck with the conical mace-head again revealed damage. The part of the skull just through to the era of Roman rule (c.3500 BC to early centuries AD). The mace was a common above the eye-socket was definitely broken, with the skin split open over the same area. The and prominently depicted artefact in Pharaonic Egypt, as both a weapon and piece of regalia replica conical mace-head was also damaged during the striking of the pigs’ heads.
    [Show full text]
  • ROYAL STATUES Including Sphinxes
    ROYAL STATUES Including sphinxes EARLY DYNASTIC PERIOD Dynasties I-II Including later commemorative statues Ninutjer 800-150-900 Statuette of Ninuter seated wearing heb-sed cloak, calcite(?), formerly in G. Michaelidis colln., then in J. L. Boele van Hensbroek colln. in 1962. Simpson, W. K. in JEA 42 (1956), 45-9 figs. 1, 2 pl. iv. Send 800-160-900 Statuette of Send kneeling with vases, bronze, probably made during Dyn. XXVI, formerly in G. Posno colln. and in Paris, Hôtel Drouot, in 1883, now in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 8433. Abubakr, Abd el Monem J. Untersuchungen über die ägyptischen Kronen (1937), 27 Taf. 7; Roeder, Äg. Bronzefiguren 292 [355, e] Abb. 373 Taf. 44 [f]; Wildung, Die Rolle ägyptischer Könige im Bewußtsein ihrer Nachwelt i, 51 [Dok. xiii. 60] Abb. iv [1]. Name, Gauthier, Livre des Rois i, 22 [vi]. See Antiquités égyptiennes ... Collection de M. Gustave Posno (1874), No. 53; Hôtel Drouot Sale Cat. May 22-6, 1883, No. 53; Stern in Zeitschrift für die gebildete Welt 3 (1883), 287; Ausf. Verz. 303; von Bissing in 2 Mitteilungen des Kaiserlich Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Athenische Abteilung xxxviii (1913), 259 n. 2 (suggests from Memphis). Not identified by texts 800-195-000 Head of royal statue, perhaps early Dyn. I, in London, Petrie Museum, 15989. Petrie in Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland xxxvi (1906), 200 pl. xix; id. Arts and Crafts 31 figs. 19, 20; id. The Revolutions of Civilisation 15 fig. 7; id. in Anc. Eg. (1915), 168 view 4; id. in Hammerton, J. A.
    [Show full text]
  • 9564.Ch01.Pdf
    one · Gender and the Problem of Prehistory IMAGINING PREHISTORY To examine the contested issue of gender in ancient Near Eastern prehistory, I be- gin with a definition of the period. Prehistory is the time before the invention of writing (which took place around 3500 bce in the ancient Near East). This period is divided into several major eras of human development in eastern Europe and the ancient Near East: late Paleolithic (c. 30,000–9000 bce), proto-Neolithic and Neo- lithic (c. 9000–5600 bce), and Calcolithic (5600–3500 bce). In the European late Paleolithic, we begin to have some evidence of human creative consciousness in the form of cave paintings, figurines, and tools decorated with designs or with figures of animals or humans. The Neolithic is divided from the Paleolithic by the move- ment from food gathering (hunting and collecting fruits, nuts, and plants) to food growing and domestication of animals. The Calcolithic describes a time of more developed agriculture (including the use of the plow and irrigation) as well as trade and early urbanization. The Neolithic revolution took place gradually in the ancient Near East between 9000 and 7000 bce. At first, herds of wild animals or areas of wild grains were cor- doned oª and controlled by more settled human groups; later, with full domestica- tion, animals were bred for food, milk, or skins, and seeds were conserved for plant- ing grains. These innovations developed along parallel lines in several places in the ancient Near East and spread to other nearby areas. There was not a uniform, straightforward pattern of development.
    [Show full text]
  • World Archaeology, Vol
    Feminisms, Queer Theories, and the Archaeological Study of Past Sexualities Author(s): Barbara L. Voss Source: World Archaeology, Vol. 32, No. 2, Queer Archaeologies (Oct., 2000), pp. 180-192 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/827864 Accessed: 23-08-2015 06:25 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to World Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 159.178.22.27 on Sun, 23 Aug 2015 06:25:36 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Feminisms,queer theories,and the archaeologicalstudy of past sexualities Barbara L. Voss Abstract Archaeologyfaces the unique challenge of stretchingsocial theories of sexuality in newchrono- logicaland methodological directions. This essay uses an analysisof citational practices to consider how feministand queertheories articulate with archaeological investigations of sexuality.Both queertheories and feminist archaeological practices are shown to be powerfultools that can be used to expandarchaeological interpretations ofgender and sexuality. Keywords Sexuality;gender; queer theory; feminism; history of archaeology. There is another social functionof gender to be considered and that is the social markingof sexuallyappropriate partners...
    [Show full text]
  • Die Grabanlagen Der Königin Hetepheres 11
    46 P. J an 0 si: Grabanlagen ZÄS 123 (1996) PETER JA.NOSI Die Grabanlagen der Königin Hetepheres 11. Königin Hetepheres H., eine Enkelin Hetepheres' 1., wird allgemein mit drei Grabanlagen in Giza in Verbindung gebracht: mit den Mastabas G 7110-7120, G 7350 und G 7530-7540, die alle östlich der Cheopspyramide liegen I (Abb. 1). In welcher der drei Anlagen die Köni• gin tatsächlich bestattet war und warum sie mit diesen Gräbern in Verbindung gebracht wird, beruht vor allem auf den Rekonstruktionen von George A. Reisner, dem Ausgräber 2 der Nekropole G 7000 . Seine Versuche, die Geschichte der Gizanekropole anhand der archäologischen Befunde, der Architektur, Reliefs, Inschriften und der (von ihm rekonstru­ ierten) Familienbeziehungen zu erklären und in weiterer Folge damit auch eine Geschichte der 4. Dynastie zu entwerfen, bilden bis heute das Fundament für jene Epoche. An den An­ fang sei daher eine Zusammenfassung der Reisnerschen Ergebnisse und Rekonstruktionen gestellt, die mit unterschiedlichen Abwandlungen Eingang in die ägyptologische Literatur gefunden haben. Alle Informationen über Hetepheres H. stammen aus dem Grab ihrer Tochter Meresanch III. in Giza (G 7530-7540) (Abb. 1, 3t Aus den Inschriften und Darstellungen in diesem Grab 4 geht hervor, daß Hetepheres 11. eine Tochter des Cheops war • In diesem Grab wird Prinz Kawab, der Besitzer der Mastaba G 7110-7120, als Vater der Meresanch IrI. genannt Uf.s .. .Klw cbt Er gilt aufgrund der Position seines Grabes unmittelbar östlich der Königinnen• pyramide G I-a (Abb. 1) als Sohn des Cheops. Kawab und Hetepheres H. waren die Eltern der Meresanch IIL6 Als Schwester oder Halbschwester und Gemahlin des Kawab sollte I PM HF, 187, 193, 197ff.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragon Magazine #217
    Issue #217 Vol. XIX, No. 12 May 1995 Publisher TSR, Inc. Associate Publisher Brian Thomsen SPECIAL ATTRACTIONS Editor-in-Chief Boons & Benefits Larry Granato Kim Mohan 10 Compensate your PCs with rewards far more Associate editor valuable than mere cash or jewels. Dale A. Donovan Behind Enemy Lines Phil Masters Fiction editor 18 The PCs are trapped in hostile territory with an Barbara G. Young entire army chasing them. Sounds like fun, doesnt it? Editorial assistant Two Heads are Better than One Joshua Siegel Wolfgang H. Baur 22 Michelle Vuckovich Split the game masters chores between two people. Art director Class Action Peter C. Zelinski Larry W. Smith 26 How about a party of only fighters, thieves, clerics, or mages? Production Renee Ciske Tracey Isler REVIEWS Subscriptions Janet L. Winters Eye of the Monitor Jay & Dee 65 Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. U.S. advertising Cindy Rick The Role of Books John C. Bunnell 86 Delve into these faerie tales for all ages. U.K. correspondent and U.K. advertising Carolyn Wildman DRAGON® Magazine (ISSN 1062-2101) is published Magazine Marketing, Tavistock Road, West Drayton, monthly by TSR, inc., 201 Sheridan Springs Road, Middlesex UB7 7QE, United Kingdom; telephone: Lake Geneva WI 53147, United States of America. The 0895-444055. postal address for all materials from the United States Subscriptions: Subscription rates via second-class of America and Canada except subscription orders is: mail are as follows: $30 in U.S. funds for 12 issues DRAGON® Magazine, 201 Sheridan Springs Road, sent to an address in the U.S.; $36 in U.S.
    [Show full text]