NEW DEAL LEFTISTS, HENRY WALLACE and "GIDEON's ARMY," and the PROGRESSIVE PARTY in MONTANA, 1937-1952 Hugh T

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NEW DEAL LEFTISTS, HENRY WALLACE and University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Quarterly Great Plains Studies, Center for Fall 2012 NEW DEAL LEFTISTS, HENRY WALLACE AND "GIDEON'S ARMY," AND THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY IN MONTANA, 1937-1952 Hugh T. Lovin University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly Part of the American Studies Commons, Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons Lovin, Hugh T., "NEW DEAL LEFTISTS, HENRY WALLACE AND "GIDEON'S ARMY," AND THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY IN MONTANA, 1937-1952" (2012). Great Plains Quarterly. 2820. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsquarterly/2820 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Quarterly by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. NEW DEAL LEFTISTS, HENRY WALLACE AND "GIDEON'S ARMY," AND THE PROGRESSIVE PARTY IN MONTANA, 1937-1952 HUGH T. LOVIN Many forces occupied America's sociopo­ federal government's thrust to the leftward litical terrain to the left of New Dealers who in. certain particulars, and impose New Deal­ dominated U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt's style reform programs in states where the administration of the 1930s. Some fastened Democratic Party's conservative wing had themselves temporarily to the New Dealers' gained the upper hand. coattails. Ideologically motivated, others touted Subscribing to the last proposals, self-defined their special panaceas for ending the Great New. Deal Leftists in Montana, a group whose Depression that had begun in 1929, and certain members often labeled themselves as "progres­ of the mainstream Democratic Party's expa­ sives," in part because they traced their politi­ triates added to this cacophony by pursuing cal identities to the Bull Moosers' Progressive their own agendas. Comprised principally of movement in 1912, judged themselves as the Democratic Party's out-of-power people, Roosevelt's only truly committed followers in another group wanted to restore Roosevelt's the state. But they wanted more social change reforming to its 1933-34 height, change the than Roosevelt's forces had accomplished and in 1937 broke away from the more conservative Democratic Party majority in Montana. It was Key Words: Communism, Democratic Party, Harry a divorce between sides that had tired of their Truman, Korean War togetherness.l Then these Leftists reasserted numerous New Deal principles but sought to Hugh T. Lovin, a PhD graduate of the University of expand the scope of existing New Deal pro­ Washington (1963), is professor emeritus of history at Boise State University. He has also taught at the grams, tried to elect like-minded Montanans University of Alaska, and at what was then known as to public offices in 1938-48, and generally sup­ Kearney State College in Nebraska. He is the editor ported Montana liberalism in 1947-52. It was a of Labor and the West, an anthology published by fight that the Leftists lost. Sunflower University Press (Manhattan, KS), and his But even in failure, the Leftists' course was work has appeared in many different historical journals. remarkable. They supplied another yardstick [GPQ 32 (Fall 2012): 273-86) with which to measure the dimensions of the 273 274 GREAT PLAINS QUARTERLY, FALL 2012 many realignments within the Democratic gave them a fighting chance to prevail. Even Party that happened after 1932. A scholar more than in Montana, a rich and dissenting labeled these readjustments "Aftershocks of the Populist heritage from the nineteenth century New Deal Earthquake."z Such realignments remained intact, as in Kansas, Nebraska, and continued to happen. The most dramatic the Dakotas. In several Plains states, Socialist incidents included Dixiecrats migrating to the ideas thrived among these anti-New Deal Republican Party in the 1940s to the 1970s and critics, and they proposed modifications to Green Party members to the Democrats after mainline New Dealers' programs that they the 2000 elections.3 Meanwhile, among groups judged economically too weak and socially that rebelled earlier against the Democratic constrained by middle-of-the-road conven­ Party in the wake of Roosevelt's New Deal. tionality. More important, as in Montana, the of the 1930s, Montana's New Deal Leftists ranks of these activists in the Plains included believed so strongly in their principles that many survivors of Arthur Townley's earlier they bolted from their old party instead of Nonpartisan League movement, especially in muddling through within the Democratic the Dakotas, who helped to promulgate and Party's reigning coalition.4 Moreover, these struggle for left-of-the-New-Deal measures.6 Montanans acted independently in a state They, too, constituted a lively component of so­ where their political realignment seemingly called aftershocks of the New Deal earthquake. had reasonable prospects for enduring. There, Scholars have written at length about only a Montanans' old-time flirtations with radicals number of these developments outside Montana. had left behind a residue of nineteenth-century Among the more dramatic examples of such Populist and early twentieth-century Socialist Plains dissent, Milo Reno's Farmers' Holiday thinking as well as living remnants of a strong Association spread from Iowa to Plains farm­ Nonpartisan League movement of farmers ers who liked the association's ideologies and which made an appreciable showing in the radical direct action practices. Sometimes with 1920s despite conservative efforts to suppress Communist intervention, these farmers par­ it. And in the northeastern sector of the state, ticipated in incidents such as ones at Loup City, Communist ideas and certain practices flour­ Nebraska, and Sisseton, South Dakota, in 1934, ished briefly in the 1930s in Sheridan County that had disturbing sociopolitical implications'? and attracted sympathizers in neighboring Different radical activists helped to convince Daniels and Dawson Counties.5 Nonetheless, 12,487 electors in Nebraska and 36,708 in complex historical time-and-place conditions North Dakota to vote for William Lemke, the precluded Montana's New Deal Leftists from Union Party opponent of Roosevelt in the 1936 succeeding either in making their political elections. Meanwhile, other elements called for realignment permanent or, along the way, drastic changes and received a hearing in the becoming the main architects of the sociopo­ Plains states for their scheme to create a farmer­ litical order they envisioned. labor party that would implement production­ Furthermore, Montana's New Deal Leftists, for-use economics in the nation. The latter even though they failed in the end, contributed became a force in South Dakota politics and a significant chapter in the historical annals of generated considerable interest in successful movements in the 1930s and 1940s by plains­ farmer-labor party activity in Minnesota.8 people who were especially dissatisfied with In the following pages, this narrative the achievements of Roosevelt, his national focuses on New Deal Leftists in Montana administration, and Little New Deal forces in who, like other discontented plainspeople, certain states. As in Montana, these dissidents attempted to establish better conditions for threatened to disrupt conventional political Americans. The Montanans' journey began life, and their dissonance received considerable in 1937; their political aspirations were largely nurture from a political milieu that seemingly frustrated in the ensuing decade. In 1947, © 2012 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska-Lincoln NEW DEAL LEFTISTS 275 through a political marriage of convenience the Voice even accused Billings of holding for both sides, the Montana leftists joined pro-Communist ideas, and a columnist at the Henry Wallace's national third-party move­ University of Montana's student newspaper menr, and the leftist-controlled Montana alleged that Billings provided a forum to "any Progressive Party emerged from these nup­ crackpot, poolroom pink who feels like blow­ tials. After 1947, though the Montana party ing off a little steam."ll The Voice, which was encountered numerous tribulations, it sur­ published at Helena until 1969, remained the vived but prospered little until explosive dis­ MCPPA's main editorial voice. A few weeklies putes over Korean War issues and election-day admired the MCPPA, and Hamilton newspa­ setbacks destroyed it early in the 1950s. per publisher Miles Romney transformed his weekly into a MCPPA mouthpiece. A BLEAK FiRST DECADE FOR MONTANA In common with aggrieved farm and labor LEFTISTS groups in different locales, MCPPA Leftists criticized Roosevelt's federal administration After breaking away from the Montana and Democratic majorities in Congress. They Democratic Party conservatives in 1937, these denounced the Democrat-controlled regimes New Deal Leftists created the Montana Council in Montana's state government in 1938-46. for Progressive Political Action (MCPPA), For instance, they faulted Democrats in power and through it, tried to impose their agenda for not compelling industrialists to bargain col­ in state and federal circlesY Subsequently, the lectively with their workers despite new federal MCPPA movement expanded, and by the end laws such as the Wagner Act of 1935; they of 1940 its largely middle-class founders had deplored resistance
Recommended publications
  • Wheeler and the Montana Press
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1954 The court plan B. K. Wheeler and the Montana press Catherine Clara Doherty The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Doherty, Catherine Clara, "The court plan B. K. Wheeler and the Montana press" (1954). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8582. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8582 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TfflS OOCTBT PLAN, B. K. WHEELER AND THE MONTANA PRESS by CATHERINE C. DOHERTY B. A. , Montana State University, 1953 Presented In partial fulfillment ef the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1954 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: EP39383 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI OisMftaebn Ajbliehing UMI EP39383 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Election Commission 1 2 First General Counsel's
    MUR759900019 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 3 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL’S REPORT 4 5 MUR 7304 6 DATE COMPLAINT FILED: December 15, 2017 7 DATE OF NOTIFICATIONS: December 21, 2017 8 DATE LAST RESPONSE RECEIVED September 4, 2018 9 DATE ACTIVATED: May 3, 2018 10 11 EARLIEST SOL: September 10, 2020 12 LATEST SOL: December 31, 2021 13 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 14 15 COMPLAINANT: Committee to Defend the President 16 17 RESPONDENTS: Hillary Victory Fund and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 18 treasurer 19 Hillary Rodham Clinton 20 Hillary for America and Elizabeth Jones in her official capacity as 21 treasurer 22 DNC Services Corporation/Democratic National Committee and 23 William Q. Derrough in his official capacity as treasurer 24 Alaska Democratic Party and Carolyn Covington in her official 25 capacity as treasurer 26 Democratic Party of Arkansas and Dawne Vandiver in her official 27 capacity as treasurer 28 Colorado Democratic Party and Rita Simas in her official capacity 29 as treasurer 30 Democratic State Committee (Delaware) and Helene Keeley in her 31 official capacity as treasurer 32 Democratic Executive Committee of Florida and Francesca Menes 33 in her official capacity as treasurer 34 Georgia Federal Elections Committee and Kip Carr in his official 35 capacity as treasurer 36 Idaho State Democratic Party and Leroy Hayes in his official 37 capacity as treasurer 38 Indiana Democratic Congressional Victory Committee and Henry 39 Fernandez in his official capacity as treasurer 40 Iowa Democratic Party and Ken Sagar in his official capacity as 41 treasurer 42 Kansas Democratic Party and Bill Hutton in his official capacity as 43 treasurer 44 Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee and M.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Coverage of Father Charles E. Cougiilin and the Union Party by
    PRESS COVERAGE OF FATHER CHARLES E. COUGIILIN AND THE UNION PARTY BY ,. FOUR METROPOLITAN DAILY NEWSPAPERS DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN OF 1936: A STUDY Thesis for the Degree of M . A. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY MES C. RAGAINS 1967 _ W“ Witt-95 2262.533 1 p- LU 9 1‘? 1923 '3 if." r Y‘Pi’v‘éfi“ I :- . J \ 1: .0 G‘ ‘73"; '- QNQFA IW“ _____.—————- ~ ABSTRACT PRESS COVERAGE OF FATHER CHARLES E. COUGHLIN AND THE UNION PARTY BY FOUR METROPOLITAN DAILY NEWSPAPERS DURING THE ELECTION CAMPAIGN OF 1936: A STUDY by Charles C. Ragains This study is the result of the writer's inter- est in the Reverend Father Charles E. Coughlin, a Roman Catholic priest who was pastor of a parish in Royal Oak, Michigan, and whose oratory attracted national attention and considerable controversy; in the political and social ferment in the United States during the 1930's; and in the American press. The questions that motivated the study were: How did the nation's newspapers react to Coughlin, who is regarded as one of the foremost dema- gogues in American history, at the height of his career? Did the press significantly affect the priest's influence and power one way or the other? How did newspapers in- terpret Coughlin and his actions to their readers? Because of the length of Coughlin's public career (nearly sixteen years) it has been necessary to select a salient event or period on which to concentrate. Charles C. Ragains The period selected is the presidential election campaign of 1936. This span of approximately five and one-half months was chosen for several reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck a Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment O
    The Rise and Impact of Fact-Checking in U.S. Campaigns by Amanda Wintersieck A Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Approved April 2015 by the Graduate Supervisory Committee: Kim Fridkin, Chair Mark Ramirez Patrick Kenney ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY May 2015 ABSTRACT Do fact-checks influence individuals' attitudes and evaluations of political candidates and campaign messages? This dissertation examines the influence of fact- checks on citizens' evaluations of political candidates. Using an original content analysis, I determine who conducts fact-checks of candidates for political office, who is being fact- checked, and how fact-checkers rate political candidates' level of truthfulness. Additionally, I employ three experiments to evaluate the impact of fact-checks source and message cues on voters' evaluations of candidates for political office. i DEDICATION To My Husband, Aza ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to express my sincerest thanks to the many individuals who helped me with this dissertation and throughout my graduate career. First, I would like to thank all the members of my committee, Professors Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick Kenney, and Mark D. Ramirez. I am especially grateful to my mentor and committee chair, Dr. Kim L. Fridkin. Your help and encouragement were invaluable during every stage of this dissertation and my graduate career. I would also like to thank my other committee members and mentors, Patrick Kenney and Mark D. Ramirez. Your academic and professional advice has significantly improved my abilities as a scholar. I am grateful to husband, Aza, for his tireless support and love throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobbying Contribution Report
    8/1/2016 LD­203 Contribution Report LOBBYING CONTRIBUTION REPORT Clerk of the House of Representatives • Legislative Resource Center • 135 Cannon Building • Washington, DC 20515 Secretary of the Senate • Office of Public Records • 232 Hart Building • Washington, DC 20510 1. FILER TYPE AND NAME 2. IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS Type: House Registrant ID: Organization Lobbyist 35195 Organization Name: Senate Registrant ID: Honeywell International 57453 3. REPORTING PERIOD 4. CONTACT INFORMATION Year: Contact Name: 2016 Ms.Stacey Bernards Mid­Year (January 1 ­ June 30) Email: Year­End (July 1 ­ December 31) [email protected] Amendment Phone: 2026622629 Address: 101 CONSTITUTION AVENUE, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20001 USA 5. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE NAMES Honeywell International Political Action Committee 6. CONTRIBUTIONS No Contributions #1. Contribution Type: Contributor Name: Amount: Date: FECA Honeywell International Political Action Committee $1,500.00 01/14/2016 Payee: Honoree: Friends of Sam Johnson Sam Johnson #2. Contribution Type: Contributor Name: Amount: Date: FECA Honeywell International Political Action Committee $2,500.00 01/14/2016 Payee: Honoree: Kay Granger Campaign Fund Kay Granger #3. Contribution Type: Contributor Name: Amount: Date: FECA Honeywell International Political Action Committee $2,000.00 01/14/2016 Payee: Honoree: Paul Cook for Congress Paul Cook https://lda.congress.gov/LC/protected/LCWork/2016/MM/57453DOM.xml?1470093694684 1/75 8/1/2016 LD­203 Contribution Report #4. Contribution Type: Contributor Name: Amount: Date: FECA Honeywell International Political Action Committee $1,000.00 01/14/2016 Payee: Honoree: DelBene for Congress Suzan DelBene #5. Contribution Type: Contributor Name: Amount: Date: FECA Honeywell International Political Action Committee $1,000.00 01/14/2016 Payee: Honoree: John Carter for Congress John Carter #6.
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Democratic Party Position: Executive Director Salary & Benefits
    Employer: Montana Democratic Party Position: Executive Director Salary & Benefits: $85,000-$95,000 dependent on experience/qualifications, full healthcare benefits, travel reimbursement. Supervision: Montana Democratic Party Executive Board, Chair, and Committees as appropriate Location: Helena, Montana MONTANA DEMOCRATIC PARTY MISSION STATEMENT The Montana Democratic Party recruits, trains and elects Democrats to local, statewide and federal office to ensure a government of the people, by the people, and for the people of Montana. JOB ANNOUNCEMENT The Montana Democratic Party seeks a dynamic, committed individual to lead our staff. We are looking for a person with comprehensive management, fundraising, and political skills that will complement the existing talent in our party organization. This is a year-round, full-time salaried position with full healthcare benefits, travel reimBursement and willingness to work long, irregular hours, including evenings and weekends. Employee will be based in Helena, Montana with extensive statewide and possible out-of-state travel. The Montana Democratic Party Executive Director will report directly to the Montana Democratic Party Executive Board. APPLICATION PROCESS This position announcement will be posted by Wednesday, July 14, 2021 and is open until filled; the Personnel Committee will conduct interviews on a rolling basis. A cover letter, resume, and three references must Be sent via email to [email protected]. Both application review and interviews will Be conducted By the Personnel Committee of the Montana Democratic Party Executive Board, with staff and the Board given an opportunity to meet with the applicant for a question/answer session. A recommendation will Be made by the Personnel Committee to the Executive Board.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 19-524 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ROQUE DE LA FUENTE, AKA ROCKY, Petitioner, v. AlEX PADIllA, CALIFOrnIA SECRETARY OF STATE, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CouRT OF AppEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRcuIT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE PROFESSORS OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND HISTORY IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ALICia I. DEARN, ESQ. Counsel of Record 231 South Bemiston Avenue, Suite 850 Clayton, MO 63105 (314) 526-0040 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae 292830 A (800) 274-3321 • (800) 359-6859 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................i TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES .............. ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ..................1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................6 ARGUMENT....................................7 I. CERTIORARI IS DESIRABLE BECAUSE THERE IS CONFUSION AMONG LOWER COURTS OVER WHETHER THE APPLY THE USAGE TEST ...........7 II. THE NINTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY STATED THAT BECAUSE MINOR PARTY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES HAVE APPEARED ON THE CALIFORNIA BALLOT, THEREFORE IT IS NOT SIGNIFICANT THAT NO INDEPENDENT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HAS QUALIFIED SINCE 1992 ..............................15 CONCLUSION .................................20 ii TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES Page CASES: American Party v. Jernigan, 424 F.Supp. 943 (e.d. Ark. 1977)..................8 Arutunoff v. Oklahoma State Election Board, 687 F.2d 1375 (1982)...........................14 Bergland v. Harris, 767 F.2d 1551 (1985) ..........................8-9 Bradley v Mandel, 449 F. Supp. 983 (1978) ........................10 Citizens to Establish a Reform Party in Arkansas v. Priest, 970 F. Supp. 690 (e.d. Ark. 1996) .................8 Coffield v. Kemp, 599 F.3d 1276 (2010) ...........................12 Cowen v. Raffensperger, 1:17cv-4660 ..................................12 Dart v.
    [Show full text]
  • Bylaws and Policies of the Yellowstone County Democratic Central Committee Revised January 15, 2020 Organization the Organizatio
    Bylaws and Policies of the Yellowstone County Democratic Central Committee Revised January 15, 2020 Organization The organization shall be named the Yellowstone County Democratic Central Committee, hereafter YCDCC. The organization may be referred to as Yellowstone County Democrats. The YCDCC shall consist of an elected executive board, elected or appointed precinct committeemen and committeewomen, appointed standing committee chairpersons, and public officials elected or appointed within all or part of Yellowstone County. Mission The YCDCC shall conduct outreach to expand membership and engage in other field programs and activities that advance the values of the Democratic Party. The YCDCC shall recruit and assist in electing Democrats to local, statewide and federal office to ensure a government of the people, by the people, and for the people of Montana. Participation All public meetings of the YCDCC are open to all members of the Democratic Party regardless of race, color, creed, sex, age, national origin, religion, ethnic identity, economic status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or philosophical persuasion. Members of the Democratic Party are defined as any individuals who are supportive of the Democratic Party’s mission and values and are in good standing with the organization. All members of the Democratic Party of Yellowstone County shall be encouraged to participate in party programs and activities. Voting All members of the YCDCC, as described under organization, may vote on issues concerning the general operation of the YCDCC. The voting membership of the YCDCC shall be the executive board members and elected or appointed precinct committeemen and committeewomen. The voting membership shall be the voting members for: (1) elections, (2) appointments, (3) removal from office proceedings, (4) bylaws and policies amendment(s), (5) platform proposals, and (6) election campaign support decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping out the International Spy Museum
    Acad. Quest. DOI 10.1007/s12129-010-9171-1 ARTICLE Scoping Out the International Spy Museum Ronald Radosh # The Authors 2010 The International Spy Museum in Washington, D.C.—a private museum that opened in July 2002 at the cost of $40 million—is rated as one of the most visited and popular tourist destinations in our nation’s capital, despite stiff competition from the various public museums that are part of the Smithsonian. The popularity of the Spy Museum has a great deal to do with how espionage has been portrayed in the popular culture, especially in the movies. Indeed, the museum pays homage to cinema with its display of the first Aston Martin used by James Bond, when Agent 007 was played by Sean Connery in the films made during the JFK years. The Spy Museum’s board of directors includes Peter Earnest, a former CIA operative and the museum’s first chief executive; David Kahn, the analyst of cryptology; Gen. Oleg Kalugin, a former KGB agent; as well as R. James Woolsey, a former director of the CIA. Clearly, the board intends that in addition to the museum’s considerable entertainment value, its exhibits and texts convey a sense of the reality of the spy’s life and the historical context in which espionage agents operated. The day I toured the museum it was filled with high school students who stood at the various exhibits taking copious notes. It was obvious that before their visit the students had been told to see what the exhibits could teach them about topics discussed in either their history or social studies classes.
    [Show full text]
  • I State Political Parties in American Politics
    State Political Parties in American Politics: Innovation and Integration in the Party System by Rebecca S. Hatch Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ John H. Aldrich, Supervisor ___________________________ Kerry L. Haynie ___________________________ Michael C. Munger ___________________________ David W. Rohde Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 i v ABSTRACT State Political Parties in American Politics: Innovation and Integration in the Party System by Rebecca S. Hatch Department of Political Science Duke University Date:_______________________ Approved: ___________________________ John H. Aldrich, Supervisor ___________________________ Kerry L. Haynie ___________________________ Michael C. Munger ___________________________ David W. Rohde An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Copyright by Rebecca S. Hatch 2016 Abstract What role do state party organizations play in twenty-first century American politics? What is the nature of the relationship between the state and national party organizations in contemporary elections? These questions frame the three studies presented in this dissertation. More specifically, I examine the organizational development
    [Show full text]
  • Arne Swabeck Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt4s2012z6 No online items Register of the Arne Swabeck papers Finding aid prepared by David Jacobs Hoover Institution Archives 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA, 94305-6003 (650) 723-3563 [email protected] © 2003 Register of the Arne Swabeck 87019 1 papers Title: Arne Swabeck papers Date (inclusive): 1913-1999 Collection Number: 87019 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 21 manuscript boxes(8.4 linear feet) Abstract: Memoirs, other writings, correspondence, resolutions, bulletins, minutes, pamphlets, and serial issues, relating to socialist and communist movements in the United States, and especially to the Socialist Workers Party and other Trotskyist groups in the post-World War II period. Creator: Swabeck, Arne Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Archives. Preferred Citation [Identification of item], Arne Swabeck papers, [Box no., Folder no. or title], Hoover Institution Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Archives in 1987. Accruals Materials may have been added to the collection since this finding aid was prepared. To determine if this has occurred, find the collection in Stanford University's online catalog at https://searchworks.stanford.edu . Materials have been added to the collection if the number
    [Show full text]
  • Henry A. Wallace: Quixotic Crusade 1948
    Syracuse University SURFACE Books Document Types 1960 Henry A. Wallace: Quixotic Crusade 1948 Karl M. Schmidt Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/books Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Schmidt, Karl M., "Henry A. Wallace: Quixotic Crusade 1948" (1960). Books. 3. https://surface.syr.edu/books/3 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Document Types at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Books by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HENRY A.WALLACE: Quixotic Crusade 1948 Karl M. Schmidt SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1960 Library of Congress Catalog Card: 60-16440 COPYRIGHT I960, SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY PRESS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY THE VAEL-BALLOU PRESS, INC., BINGHAMTON, NEW YORK For Jill ace Trefc THE TWO-PARTY system has been a feature of the American political scene for all except a few brief periods in our his- tory. Yet, during most of the last 130 years, the traditional two major parties have had in virtually every election at least one minor-party competitor. Despite this persistence, there has been a continuing pattern of failure. Never has an American third party been successful in displacing a major competitor. (Both the Whigs and the Republicans grew and came to power in two of those rare periods when a single major party was dominant.) The presidential campaign of 1948 was not exceptional in that it witnessed new minor-party challenges to Democratic and Republican supremacy.
    [Show full text]