<<

Participatory pharmacotherapy: 10 strategies for enhancing adherence

Engaging patients as partners in treatment can improve outcomes

sychiatric patients stand to benefit greatly from ad- hering to prescribed pharmacotherapy, but many patients typically do not follow their regi- P 1,2 mens. Three months after pharmacotherapy is initiated, approximately 50% of patients with major depressive dis- order (MDD) do not take their prescribed antidepressants.3 Adherence rates in patients with schizophrenia range from 50% to 60%, and patients with bipolar disorder have adher- ence rates as low as 35%.4-6 One possible explanation for “treatment-resistant” depression, schizophrenia, and bi- polar disorder may simply be nonadherence to prescribed pharmacotherapy. Several strategies have been used to address this vex- © OLIVER ELTINGER/CORBIS ing problem (Table 1).7,8 They include individual and fam- ily psychoeducation,9,10 cognitive-behavioral ,11 Moshe S. Torem, MD interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, and family- Professor of Psychiatry Northeast Ohio Medical University focused therapy. This article describes an additional Rootstown, OH strategy I call “participatory pharmacotherapy.” In this Chief, Integrative Medicine model, the patient becomes a partner in the process of Akron General Medical Center Medical Director treatment choices and decision-making. This encourag- Center for Mind-Body Medicine es patients to provide their own opinions and points of Akron, OH view regarding medication use. The prescribing clinician makes the patient feel that he or she has been listened to and understood. This and other techniques emphasize forming a therapeutic alliance with the patient before ini- tiating pharmacotherapy. The patient provides informa- tion on his or her family history, medical and psychiatric history, and experience with previous , with a specific focus on which medications worked best for the patient and family members diagnosed with a similar Current Psychiatry condition. Vol. 12, No. 7 21 continued Table 1 allow her to achieve a new healthy, happy state in which she will be able to laugh, Improving adherence to socialize, and have fun every day for the pharmacotherapy: Basic principles rest of her life. Although achieving remis- Identify poor adherence by looking for markers: sion is a realistic and desirable treatment missed appointment, lack of response to goal, Ms. D’s expectations are idealistic. medication, missed refills Helping Ms. D accept and agree to realistic Emphasize the value of the medication regimen Participatory and the effect of adherence and achievable outcomes will improve her adherence to prescribed medications. pharmacotherapy Elicit the patient’s feelings about his or her ability to follow the medication regimen, and when needed, provide supports to promote 2. Encourage patients to share their ideas adherence, such as self-monitoring mood of how a desirable outcome can be ac- charts complished. Similar to their expectations Provide simple, clear instructions and simplify the medication regimen of outcomes, some patients have an unre- alistic understanding of how treatment is Encourage the use of a medication-taking system, such as daily pill boxes conducted. Some patients expect treatment Clinical Point Listen to the patient, customize the medication to be limited to prescribed medications Discuss with patients regimen to be compatible with the patient’s or a one-time injection of a curative . wishes and choices Others prefer to use herbs and supplements a realistic expectation Obtain help from family members, friends, and and want to avoid prescribed medications. community services when needed of pharmacotherapy, Understanding the patient’s expectations of Reinforce desirable behavior and results when how treatment is carried out will allow cli- and modify the appropriate nicians to provide patients with a rational patient’s beliefs to Consider more “forgiving” medications when view of treatment and establish a partner- match a probable adherence appears unlikely: • Medications with a long half-life ship based on realistic expectations. outcome • Depot (extended-release) medications • Transdermal medications 3. Engage patients in choosing the best Source: Reference 7,8 medication for them. Many patients have preconceived ideas about medications and which medicine would be best for them. Getting patients to participate They get this information from various One of the fundamental tasks is to encour- sources, including family members and age patients to accept a participatory role, friends who benefitted from a specific determine their underlying diagnosis, and drug, personal experience with medica- co-create a treatment plan that will be most tions, and exposure to drug advertising. compatible with their illness and their Understanding the patient’s preference personality. There are 10 components of for a specific medication and why he or she establishing and practicing participatory made such a choice is critical because do- pharmacotherapy. ing so can take advantage of the patient’s self-fulfilling prophecies and improve the 1. Encourage patients to share their chances of obtaining a better outcome. For opinion of what a desirable treatment example, Mr. O, a 52-year-old father of 3, outcome should be. Some patients have has been experiencing recurrent episodes unrealistic expectations about what medi- of severe panic attacks. His clinician asked cations can achieve. Clarify with patients him to describe medications that in his Discuss this article at what would be a realistic expectation of opinion were most helpful in the past. He www.facebook.com/ pharmacotherapy, and modify the pa- said he preferred clonazepam because it CurrentPsychiatry tient’s beliefs to be compatible with a more had helped him control the panic attacks probable outcome. For example, Ms. D, a and had minimal side effects, but he dis- 46-year-old mother of 2, is diagnosed with continued it after a previous psychothera- MDD, recurrent type without psychotic pist told him he would become addicted features. She states she expects pharma- to it. Obtaining this information was valu- Current Psychiatry 22 July 2013 cotherapy will alleviate all symptoms and able because the clinician was able to clar- ify guidelines for clonazepam use without she chose gluteal injections because, as a the risk of dependence. Mr. O is prescribed child, her pediatrician had treated her for clonazepam, which he takes consistently an unspecified illness by injecting medica- and responds to excellently. tion in her buttock, which rapidly relieved her symptoms. This left her with the im- 4. Involve patients in setting treatment pression that injectable medications were goals and targeting symptoms to be re- the best therapeutic delivery system. After lieved. Actively listen when patients de- discussing the practicalities and availability scribe their symptoms, discomforts, and of fast-acting medications to control panic past experiences with treatments. I invite attacks, we agreed to use orally disintegrat- patients to speak uninterrupted for 5 to ing clonazepam, which is absorbed swiftly 10 minutes, even if they talk about issues and provides fast symptom relief. Ms. S re- that seem irrelevant. I then summarize the ported favorable results and was pleased patient’s major points and ask, “And what with the process of developing this strategy else?” After he or she says, “That’s it,” I ask with her clinician. the patient to assign a priority to alleviat- ing each symptom. 6. Involve patients in choosing the times Clinical Point For example, Ms. J, a 38-year-old mar- and frequency of medication administra- Taking a medication ried mother of 2, was diagnosed with bi- tion. The timing and frequency of medica- polar II disorder. She listed her highest tion administration can be used to enhance once a day could priority as controlling her impulsive shop- desirable therapeutic effects. For example, improve adherence ping rather than alleviating depression, an antidepressant that causes sedation and compared with insomnia, or overeating. She had been somnolence could be taken at bedtime to taking the same forced to declare bankruptcy twice, and help alleviate insomnia. Some studies have medication in she was determined to never do so again. shown that taking a medication once a day She also wanted to regain her husband’s improves adherence compared with tak- divided doses trust and her ability to manage her financ- ing the same medication in divided doses.13 es. Ensuring that Ms. J felt understood re- Other patients may wish to take a medica- garding this issue increased the chances of tion several times a day so they can keep the establishing a solid treatment partnership. medication in their purse or briefcase and Providing Ms. J with a menu of treatment feel confident that if they need a medication choices and asking her to describe her for immediate symptom relief, it will be previous experiences with medications readily available. helped her and the clinician choose a med- ication that is compatible with her desire to 7. Teach patients to self-monitor chang- control her impulsive shopping. es and improvements in target symp- toms. Engaging patients in a system of 5. Engage patients in choosing the best self-monitoring improves their chances of delivery system for the prescribed medi- achieving successful treatment outcomes.14 cation. For many medications, clinicians Instruct patients to create a list of symp- can choose from a variety of delivery sys- toms and monitor the intensity of each tems, including pills, transdermal patches, symptom using a rating scale of 1 to 5, rectal or vaginal suppositories, creams, oint- where 1 represents the lowest intensity and ments, orally disintegrating tablets, liquids, 5 represents the highest. As for frequency, and intramuscular injections. Patients have patients can rate each symptom from “not varying beliefs about the efficacy of particu- present” to “present most of the time.” lar delivery systems, based on personal ex- Self-monitoring allows patients to ob- periences or what they have learned from serve which daily behaviors and lifestyle the media, their family and friends, or the choices make symptoms better and which Internet. For example, Ms. S, age 28, expe- make them worse. For example, Mrs. P, a rienced recurrent, disabling anxiety attacks. 38-year-old married mother of 2, had anxi- When asked about the best way of provid- ety and panic attacks associated with low Current Psychiatry ing medication to relieve her symptoms, self-esteem and chronic depression. Her Vol. 12, No. 7 23 Table 2 Choosing patients for participatory pharmacotherapy Good candidates Exclusionary qualities Adults Children, adolescents, and prison inmates No history of alcoholism or drug addiction Alcohol dependence or drug addiction Average or above-average intelligence Below-average intelligence Participatory Intact cognitive function Cognitive deficits, such as dementia pharmacotherapy No psychotic symptoms Actively psychotic Good comprehension of diagnosis and Poor comprehension of diagnosis and treatment treatment Therapeutic alliance is present Therapeutic alliance is absent Personality style or disorder with a need to Passive, dependent personality style or disorder be in control of treatment, such as obsessive- (these patients may view a participatory approach compulsive personality as reflecting the ’s lack of confidence) Clinical Point Use the patient’s clinician instructed her to use a 1-page reports irritability, insomnia, short tem- language as a way form to monitor the frequency and inten- per, and restlessness. After reviewing his of pacing yourself sity of her anxiety and panic symptoms desired treatment outcome, we discuss to the patient’s by focusing on the physical manifesta- the benefits of pharmacotherapy. I tell description of his or tions, such as rapid heartbeat, shortness him the new medication will improve of breath, nausea, tremors, dry mouth, the quality and length of his sleep, which her distress frequent urination, and diarrhea to see if will allow his body and mind to recharge there was any correlation between her be- his “internal batteries” and restore health haviors and her symptoms. and energy. When we discuss side effects, I tell him to expect a dry mouth, which 8. Instruct patients to call you to report will be his signal that the medication is any changes, including minor successes. working. This discussion helps patients Early in my career, toward the end of each reframe side effects and improves their appointment after I’d prescribed medica- ability to tolerate side effects and adhere to tions I’d tell patients, “Please call me if pharmacotherapy. you have a problem.” Frequently, patients would call with a list of problems and side 10. Harness the placebo effect and effects that they believed were caused by the power of suggestion to increase the newly prescribed medication. Later, chances of achieving the best treat- I realized that I may have inadvertently ment outcomes. In a previous article,12 encouraged patients to develop prob- I reviewed the principles of recognizing lems so they would have a reason to call and enhancing the placebo effect and the me. To achieve a more favorable outcome power of suggestion to improve the chanc- I changed the way I communicate. I now es of achieving better pharmacotherapy say, “Please call me next week, even if you outcomes. When practicing participatory begin to feel better with this new medica- pharmacotherapy, clinicians are conscious- tion.” The phone call is now associated ly aware of the power embedded in their with the idea that they will “get better,” words and are careful to use language that and internalizing such a suggestion allows enhances the placebo effect and the power patients to talk with the clinician and re- of suggestion when prescribing medica- port favorable treatment results. tions. Use the patient’s own language as a way of pacing yourself to the patient’s de- 9. Tell patients to monitor their suc- scription of his or her distress. For example, cesses by relabeling and reframing their Ms. R, a 42-year-old mother of 3, describes Current Psychiatry 24 July 2013 symptoms. Mr. B, age 28, has MDD and her experiences seeking help for her anxi- ety and depression, stating that she has not yet found the right combination of medi- Related Resources cations that provide benefits with toler- • Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, et al. Interventions for en- hancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst able side effects. Her clinician responds by Rev. 2008;16(2);CD000011. focusing on the word “yet” (pacing) stat- • Mahone IH. Shared decision making and serious mental ill- ing, “even though you have not yet found ness. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2008;22(6):334-343. the right combination of medications to • Russel CL, Ruppar TM, Metteson M. Improving medica- tion adherence: moving from intention and motivation provide the most desirable benefit of be- to a personal systems approach. Nurs Clin North Am. ginning healing and restoring your hope, 2011;46(3):271-281. I promise to work with you and together • Tibaldi G, Salvador-Carulla L, Garcia-Gutierrez JC. From treatment adherence to advanced shared decision making: we will try to achieve an improvement in New professional strategies and attitudes in mental health your overall health and well-being.” This care. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2011;6(2):91-99. response includes several positive words Drug Brand Name and suggestions of future success, which Clonazepam • Klonopin are referred to as leading. Disclosure Not all patients will respond to par- Dr. Torem reports no financial relationship with any company ticipatory pharmacotherapy. Some factors whose products are mentioned in this article or with manufactur- Clinical Point ers of competing products. will make patients good candidates for Patients with this approach, and others should be con- sidered exclusionary qualities (Table 2). psychosis, cognitive impairment, below- Hypertension: a companion to Brenner and Rector’s References the kidney. 2nd ed. Philadelphia. PA: Elsevier Saunders; average intelligence, 1. Zygmunt A, Olfson M, Boyer CA, et al. Interventions to 2005:848. improve medication adherence in schizophrenia. Am J 9. Velligan DI, Weiden PJ, Sajatovic M, et al. Strategies for Psychiatry. 2002;159:1653-1664. and substance use addressing adherence problems in patients with serious 2. Nosé M, Barbui C, Gray R, et al. Clinical interventions for and persistent mental illness: recommendations from expert disorders are not treatment non-adherence in psychosis: meta-analysis. Br J consensus guidelines. J Psychiatr Pract. 2010;16:306-324. Psychiatry. 2003;183:197-206. 10. Miklowitz DJ. Adjunctive psychotherapy for bipolar good candidates 3. Vergouwen AC, van Hout HP, Bakker A. Methods to disorder: state of the evidence. Am J Psychiatry. 2008; improve patient compliance in the use of antidepressants. 165:1408-1419. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002;146:204-207. 11. Szentagotai A, David D. The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral 4. Lacro JP, Dunn LB, Dolder CR, et al. Prevalence of and therapy in bipolar disorder: a quantitative meta-analysis. J risk factors for medication nonadherence in patients with Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:66-72. schizophrenia: a comprehensive review of recent literature. 12. Torem MS. Words to the wise: 4 secrets of successful J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:892-909. pharmacotherapy. Current Psychiatry. 2008;7(12):19-24. 5. Perkins DO. Predictors of noncompliance in patients with 13. Medic G, Higashi K, Littlewood KJ, et al. Dosing frequency schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2002;63:1121-1128. and adherence in chronic psychiatric disease: systematic 6. Colom F, Vieta E, Martinez-Aran A, et al. Clinical factors review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013; associated with treatment noncompliance in euthymic 9:119-131. bipolar patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61:549-555. 14. Virdi N, Daskiran M, Nigam S, et al. The association of self- 7. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J monitoring of blood glucose use with medication adherence Med. 2005;353:487-497. and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes 8. Osterberg LG, Rudd R. Medication adherence for initiating non-insulin treatment. Diabetes Technol Ther. antihypertensive therapy. In: Oparil S, Weber MA, eds. 2012;14(9):790-798.

Bottom Line “Participatory pharmacotherapy” involves identifying patients as partners in the process of treatment choice and decision-making, encouraging them to provide their opinions regarding medication use, and making patients feel they have been heard and understood. This technique emphasizes forming a therapeutic alliance with the patient to improve patients’ adherence to pharmacotherapy and optimize Current Psychiatry treatment outcomes. Vol. 12, No. 7 25