The Morphometric Relationship of Upper Cave 101 and 103
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1998 The orM phometric Relationship of Upper Cave 101 and 103 to Modern Homo sapiens Deborah Lenz Cornell University of Tennessee, Knoxville Recommended Citation Cornell, Deborah Lenz, "The orM phometric Relationship of Upper Cave 101 and 103 to Modern Homo sapiens. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1998. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4155 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Deborah Lenz Cornell entitled "The orM phometric Relationship of Upper Cave 101 and 103 to Modern Homo sapiens." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Andrew Kramer, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Richard Jantz, Lyle Konigsberg, John W. Philpot Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Deborah Lenz Cornellentitled "The Morphometric Relationship of Upper Cave 101 and 103 to modem Homo sapiens." I have examined the finalcopy of this thesis forform and content and recommend that it be accepted in partialfulfillment of the requirements forthe degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. � Andrew Kramer, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Accepted forthe Council: THE MORPHOMETRIC RELATIONSHIPOF UPPER CA VE 101 AND 103 TO MODERN HOMO SAP/ENS A Thesis Presented forthe Master of Arts Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville DeborahLenz Cornell December 1998 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge the importantcontributions of many people to this thesis. First of all to the members of my committee, Ors. Andrew Kramer, Richard Jantz, Lyle Konigsberg, and John Philpot, thank you forall your help and advice. Special thanks to Dr. Jantz forrunning the statistics on his computer, all the extra attention, and for never being too busy to answer one of my many dumb questions. i would also like to thank my mother, Johanna Fusco, and my sister, Johanna CunninghamMcMichael, for all their supportand encouragement, and forassuring me that I was surely the most intelligent and literate graduate student that ever existed! While I didn't believe them, their words of supportwere much appreciated. Special thanks also goes to Dr. W.W. Howells, Dr. Gene Albrecht, Michael Wender, Ann H. Ross, and Dr. A. Russell Nelson. Dr. Howells was kind enough to furnishme a list of his measurements on the Liujiang cranium and seemed to drop whatever he was doing to promptly respond to my needs. Dr. Albrecht explained to me the value of the statistical approach used in this thesis. Michael Wender, my writing coach, was extremely patient with me and my "passive voice!" Ann Ross deservescredit for taking the tinie to measure UC I 03 for me just as she was about to hop a plane to Bosnia with the only available coordinate calipers. Also, Russ Nelson's encouraging words and input were always much appreciated. I wish our measurement sets could have jibed! ii Thanks also to my dear friendDanny Wescott, who helped me in innumerable ways, from encouragement andsupport to collating and stapling. He enabled me to hold on to my sanity and kept me smiling. Thanks to my "kids" Bear andMarmalade. They were always able to calm me down and make me feelloved. Most of all, thanks to my husband, TerryPatrick Cornell. Not onlyfor his financialsupport, but also forhis kindness and consideration throughout this long process. So many people have helped me in numerous ways. Everyoneshould be so lucky to have such fine friendsand family. Thank you all. iii ABSTRACT Upper Cave IO I and Upper Cave I 03 (UC IO I and UC I 03 ), the much argued over Homo sapiensfossils from Zhoukoudian, China, figureprominently into discussions of modem human origins. Adherents to the Multiregional model see the Zhoukoudian fossils as exhibitingsome of the same Asiancharacteristics that can be seen in modem Asianpopulations. On the other hand, proponents of the Out-of-Africamodel see anything and everything but Asianfe atures, frequently pointing out Africancharacteristics which they claim are retentions of fe atures fromthe initial exodus of modem humans. UC 101 and UC 103 were compared to Howells' modem human groups and unpublished measurements of Paleoindian and Archaic Indian crania using unweighted, unrestricted canonical variate analysis (CVA) and associated Mahalanobis Distance Analysis. Results indicate that it is unlikely that these two fossils represent the same population, however the archaeologicalcontext seems to preclude any such inference. If UC IO 1 and UC I 03 are fromthe same contemporaneous group, it may be inferred that ancient East Asiansexhibit much more variation than modem populations, an idea postulated by FranzWeidenreich in the late 1930s. These two fossilslikely represent the robust ancestors of several modern,more homogenous groups. While UC IO I is classifiedas Easter Island in the Distance Analysis, its similaritiesto European, Eskimo, African, and Archaic Indian populations can be seen in the CV A plots. It also shows some similarities to Peru and Buriat populations. UC I 03 , on the other hand, is much more of an outlier to modem populations. Although the iv CVA allies this fossilmost closely with Archaic Indians, the Lime Creek Paleoindian, and Easter Island, the Distance Analysis consistently classifiesit as Australo-Melanesian. However, UC 103's position as an outlier, combined with its extremely low typicality probabilities, indicates that this specimen is outside the range of variation present in the modem populations utilized. No overridingsupport for either school of modem human originsis found. The time depth involved between the postulated exodus of modem humans fromAfrica 200 ka and the reliably dated 29 to 24 ka Upper Cave fossilsdisallows any Africanmorphological similarities to be interpreted as lending support to the Out-of-Africamodel. On the other hand, the findingspresented here also giveno strong support to the Multiregionalschool since no close affiliationis seen between these two fossilsand modem East Asians. However, if the fossilsare truly contemporaneous, the Pleistocene population of East Asia was much more heterogeneous than today's populations, leaving open the very real possibility that the Zhoukoudian fossilsare actually ancestral to modem East Asians. The morphological variability present in the Asian Pleistocene needs to be fullyappreciated in order to adequately assess Pleistocene hominid fossilaffinities. V TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. LITERATUREREVIEW .................................................................. 1 Introduction. I Discovery and excavation of the Upper Cave at Zhoukoudian............. 3 The disappearance of the fossils.......................................................... 7 Historical interpretations of the fossils................................................ 12 The age of the fossils.......................................................................... 13 The description and current interpretations of the fossils..................... 15 Summary............................................................................................ 18 II. MATERIALS..................................................................................... 19 Description of comparative samples.................................................... 19 · W.W. Howells' Data.......................................................................... 19 ( 1) East Asia........................................................................... 22 Buriat.......................................................................... 22 Hainan......................................................................... 22 Anyang........................................................................ 23 Hokkaido..................................................................... 23 South Japan .......................................· ................... ....... · 23 (2) Hokkaido........................................................................... 24 Ainu............................................................................. 24 (3) Pacific Islands .. ·................................................................... 26 Atayal........................................................................... 26 Philippine...................................................................... 26 Guam............................................................................ 26 (4) AndamanIslands ................................................................. 27 Andaman....................................................................... 27 (5) Australo-Melanesia.............................................................. 27 Australia........................................................................ 27 Tasmania......................................................................