DOCSLIB.ORG

Glebe Society Bulletin 1999 Issue 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

.,---------------------_._- OVERDEVELOPMENTI In response to increasing local opposition to overdevelopment, the Mayor of Leichhardt, Councillor MairE:Sheehan, called a public meeting on over- development at Leichhardt Town Hall on Wednesday 17 November. As background to the issue, Council provided an information sheet to all who attended. In order that readers are aware of the procedures regarding local planning controls. and the current position in Leichhardt, this information from Council is reproduced on p2. Below is a brief report on the meeting from the Secretary of Precinct 13. The meeting was extremely well concerned about overdevelopment in attended - Leichhardt Town Wasfull our area write to the Minister and let to capacity. Many people were him know that Leichhardt standing, or sitting on the Boor. The municipality residents have had issues raised all followed the same line enough! - people were fed up with less In the opinion of Councillor Hall sunlight and open space, worried Greenland, the State Government about the effect of more people on doesn't want our Town Plan the infrastructure (especially the old approved because they want to day sewer pipes), and more traffic. increase density in our municipality. Leichhardt Council wants to A number of motions were persuade the State Government to successfully put to the meeting, one approve its Town Plan which has that the FSR (floor space ratio) across been sitting on the desk of the the municipality be reinstated as Minister for Urban AfFairsand 0.5:1. Currently the Town Plan Planning (Dr Andrew Refshauge) for gives Glebe a ratio of 0.7: 1 - and the twelve months. State Government wants more! ••.- Deputy Mayor Kris Cruden told the What if everyone in the Glebe meeting that "Council wants to work Society were to write a letter - it u with the residents to ensure that our doesn't have to be long or eloquent - Town Plan will maintain and just telling the Minister that we want improve residents' quality of life. We the Leichhardt Town Plan approved o are aiming for dearer rules, so that so that we stop losing cases in the U) any developer will know before Land and Environment Conn. ...the Mayor asked that those who are concerned about overdeve1opment in our area write to the Minister and let him (-- ------, - I -__ .J. __ .1 I know that Leichhardt municipality residents have had enough! \~~: ~ submitting an application, just Why don't we all fax such a letter to exacdy what is acceptable and what is the Minister on Monday 30 not." Council is united on this issue, November - his fax number is she said. 9957.2145 (this faxing Sttategywas Mayor Maire Sheehan said she successful four years ago in the fight thought that the municipality had for funding for the Glebe Library). done its bit for urban consolidation Let the Minister for Urban .AfF.tirs and stated that Council is hopeful Dr and Planning realise we mean Refshauge will realise this. But, she business! said, Council needs help from Chris Newton (ph.9660. 8349) residents, and the only way we can Secretary Precinct 13 save this community is to work and fight together. In order to add [precinct 13 meets on the first weight to Council's position, the Wednesday of the month at 7.00 pm Mayor asked that those who are in the Toxteth Hotel Meeting Room] A publication of THE GLEBESOCIElY Inc Box 100 Post Office Glebe NSW 2037 Australia The information below is reproduced from the leaflet distributed fitthe public meeting on overdevelopment called by Leichhardt Council, and held at Leichhardt Town Hall on Wednesday 17 November. Council has a meeting with the Minister on this issue on 31 December Developing Local Planning Conttols The Current pOtlfion In Lelchharclt Some years ago the Council embarked on a process to In NSW there is a planning hierarchy. The State review its long standing controls attd to develop a new ,.Government,. through the Department of Urban Affairs UP 20 and DCP 1Plan for the whole CoUncil area, and Planning, develops and enforces State known as the Leichhardt Town Plan. The Town Plan Environmental Planning Policies and Regional includes a draft LEP and a draft DCP. The process Environmental Plans. Each Council must then prepare involved extensive community consultation and was their own local planning controls that are consistent steered by a committee made up of community rep- with the State and Regional policies and plans. resentatives. Ueanette Knox represented the Society.] Because of the relative 'superiority' of State and regional The draft Town Plan was completed in late 1997 and policies, local councils find that, in developing their own publicly exhibited for several months. The final draft local controls, they must 'toe the line'. The most obvious was adopted by Council in late 1998 and was submitted example is the State policy that requires 'urban to DUAP for their, and Ministerial, approval. consolidation' in the Sydney metropolitan area. The Unfortunately DUAP has not accepted the new plan result of this is that each Council has to develop local and the Council has been tied up in negotiations for planning policies that increase residential development, some time attempting to convince the State whether they want to or not. Government of the merits of the plan. DPAP appears to be most concerned by Council's deliberate attempts Each local Council has responsibility for preparing their to put limits on the density and scale of new residential own local controls, usually in the form of Local development. Environmental Plans (LEPs) and Development Control Since the election of the new Council in September Plans (DCPs). These documents outline the broad 1999, the Council has embarked on trying to get in planning objectives for an area and provide the detail of place local planning controls tltatwill illTtSt the rate how these objectives are to be met through land use and and scale of change to residential areas. development controls. In September 1999 Council adopted a Mayoral minute LEPs usually 'zone' land to allow for particular types of to pursue a strategy of negotiation and public development (and prohibit particular types of campaigning to adtieve support for Leichbardt's development) such as residential, commercial and position. industrial, in specific areas, and also often spell out The Coundl is proposing both shorl term and long building density controls such as the numbers of storeys, term strategies. The Council wants the State to approve the amount of open space to be provided and so on. the draft Town Plan in order that there are better LEPs will often include detailed heritage and controls than currently exist, as soon as possible. Once conservation controls and other planning matters unique the LEP is in place further work will be done on to a particular area such as foreshore building setbacks. Council's DCP in order to strengthen and support the controls in the LEP. The Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning signs off all LEPs. It is only then that the local controls have Council and community representatives have met with legislative status. DUAP prepares the submission to the senior officers of DUAP to push the Council's case and Minister for approval but only after it is satisfied that the Council will be addressing a Ministerial advisory LEP is consistent with State and Regional policies and committee on 25 Nl)vember to argue that: plans. • Leicbhardt has done its bit for regional urban consolidation DCPs provide much more detailed controls, usually • The draft Town Plan should be approved by based on a more detailed analysis of precinct or the State Government nelghbourhood characteristics. Details win often • Following the approval of the Town Plan, include things such as how particular streetscape further detailed work on a precinc:t-by-precinct characteristics are to be retained, setbacks between basis sheuldbe undertaken to ensure that the buildings, how to retain reasonable solar access to character arid amenity of residential areas is backyards etc. , protected. The Council will be seeking a commitment from The ability of councils to determine the type and scale of DUAP that l:be Town Plan, and the Council's overall development in their area is therefore very much strategy, will be approved before the end of the year. controlled by the State Government, which has the If no such commitment is obtained then the Council power to enforce overriding policies and has the final will have no alternative than to mount a significant say on any local controls. public ounpaign to adtieve its ends. 2 The Changing Face of Glebe ADDITIONAL WORDS FROM THE PRESIDENT The Glebe Society calls on the State Government and Leichhardt Council to closely scrutinise the likely community impact of the Harold Park redevelopment .proposal. While the Society recognises that Harold Park is a national facility, this does not excuse it from being a good neighbour. In the past the HAROLD PARK PACEWAY Paceway has displayed an arrogant disregard for the wishes and A proposal for the further expansion of Harold Park Paceway aspirations of the local community. was on display at The Glebe Library until November 24. It and at this stage there appears to be has now moved back to Council's Administrative Centre at nothing in this proposal which Wetherill St Leichhardt, and submissions close on 3 December. commends it to the residents of Glebe and surrounding suburbs. There are a number of 'members' rooms' would be as While the Society has not yet made controversial aspects to the high as the existing a formal submission to the proposal: grandstand, and nothing Council. we have identified two would be lower than the 1.
Recommended publications
  • Local Government Heritage Guidelines

    Local Government Heritage Guidelines

    LOCAL GOVERNMENT HERITAGE GUIDELINES The Local Government Heritage Guidelines (including the delegation of certain Heritage Council functions under the NSW Heritage Act 1977 and the authorisation to make Interim Heritage Orders) Published by the NSW Heritage Office Locked Bag 5020 Parramatta NSW 2124 Australia Printed March 2002 © Copyright NSW Heritage Office ISBN 1 876415 59 2 HO02/5 Graphic design: Marianne Hawke Cover images: Top: Carved rooftop, Yiu Ming Temple Photo: Karl Zhao 2nd row left: Richmond Main Colliery Photo: Office of the Board of Studies 2nd row right: Aboriginal Fishtraps, Brewarrina Photo: Cameron White 3rd row left: Lord Howe Island Photo: Elizabeth Broomhead 3rd row right: Court House, Bourke Photo: Ian Jack Bottom: Rose Seidler House Photo: Office of the Board of Studies NSW Disclaimer Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith but on the basis that the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees are not liable (whether by reason of negligence, lack of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage, or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to above. CONTENTS PAGE FOREWORD 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 HERITAGE MANAGEMENT IN NSW 2 1.2 THE NSW HERITAGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 2 1.3 WHY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT HERITAGE GUIDELINES HAVE BEEN PREPARED 2 1.4 HOW TO USE THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT HERITAGE GUIDELINES 3 2. THE MEANING OF HERITAGE 4 2.1 WHAT IS "ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE"? 4 2.2 WHAT IS AN "ITEM’’, "PLACE’’ AND "PRECINCT"? 4 2.2 WHAT IS "HERITAGE SIGNIFICANCE"? 4 2.3 REFERENCES 4 3.
  • Dark Dragon Ridge: Chinese People in Wollongong, 1901-39 Peter Charles Gibson University of Wollongong

    Dark Dragon Ridge: Chinese People in Wollongong, 1901-39 Peter Charles Gibson University of Wollongong

    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 1954-2016 2014 Dark Dragon Ridge: Chinese people in Wollongong, 1901-39 Peter Charles Gibson University of Wollongong Unless otherwise indicated, the views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the University of Wollongong. Recommended Citation Gibson, Peter Charles, Dark Dragon Ridge: Chinese people in Wollongong, 1901-39, Master of Arts - Research thesis, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, 2014. https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4143 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Dark Dragon Ridge: Chinese People in Wollongong, 1901-39 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Master of Arts (Research) from University of Wollongong by Peter Charles Gibson, BA (Wollongong) School of Humanities and Social Inquiry Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts 2014 I, Peter Charles Gibson, declare that this thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Master of Arts (Research), in the School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong, is my own work unless otherwise acknowledged. It has not been submitted in whole or in part for a degree at this or any other institution. Peter Charles Gibson 18th of March 2014 Abstract This thesis sheds new light on Chinese people in Australia's past by examining Chinese in the town of Wollongong, on the New South Wales South Coast, between 1901 and 1939.
  • The Creation of Jubilee Park and Its Oval. by Max Solling The

    The Creation of Jubilee Park and Its Oval. by Max Solling The

    The Creation of Jubilee Park and its Oval. by Max Solling The configuration of the Glebe waterfront was altered during the nineteenth century by extensive reclamation. Johnston’s Creek, which began in Stanmore, and Orphan School Creek with its source on the University ridges, ran down through Glebe. Tidal swamps fringed with mangroves extended along these creeks before they emptied into Rozelle Bay. In 1878 the proprietors of Toxteth Park were reportedly carrying out reclamation work along Johnston’s Creek in 1878. 1 As Glebe was filling up with houses, in December 1886 ratepayers at a public meeting urged the government to resume Allen’s Glen for the purposes of public recreation.2 William Pritchard, former Leichhardt councillor, referred to the area in 1891 as “North Annandale a few years ago known as the stinkpot, a reputation earned for it by the horrible stenches and miasma that came from the mangrove swamps” near the head of Rozelle Bay. The Sydney Freehold Land Building and Investment Company, both owner and financier of development of North Annandale Estate, had then begun reclaiming the swampy land, as did the Allen family who owned the other side of Johnston’s Creek.3 Francis Abigail MLA urged Henry Parkes MLA and Premier to have swamp reclamation works carried out.4 The Public Works Department thus began construction in 1893 of a ballast dyke from the mouth of White’s Creek to Glebe Point. A government dredge, the ‘Groper’, cut up the clay with rotating knives below. A vertical suction pipe was used to pump the dredged sediment half a mile, to be discharged behind the stone dyke.
  • Feature Articles on Australia's Engagement with Asia

    Feature Articles on Australia's Engagement with Asia

    wine making Feature articles on Australia’s engagement Volume 44 No 2 2012 In this issue: Australia’s engagement with with Asia Asia – Part A: Overview of the People’s Republic of China .........7 Part B: Rising China and ourishing China-Australia relationship ........................................ 24 ICT Update: Australian and Asian trends in internet, mobile and social media usage with student learning..................20 PROJECTS • REPORTS • RESOURCES • ARTICLES • REVIEWS EXECUTIVE 2012 President Mr Nick Hutchinson, Macquarie University Vice Presidents Mr Milton Brown, SurfAid International Dr Grant Kleeman, Macquarie University Ms Sharon McLean, St Ignatius College Riverview Honorary Secretary Mrs Sarah Menassa-Rose, Franciscan Friars Minute Secretary Mr Paul Alger, Retired OFFICE OF THE GEOGRAPHY TEACHERS’ ASSOCIATION OF NEW SOUTH WALES Honorary Treasurer ABN 59246850128 Dr Grant Kleeman, Macquarie University Address: Block B, Leichhardt Public School Grounds, Councillors 101–105 Norton Street, (Cnr. Norton & Marion Streets) Dr Susan Bliss, Editor, Macmillan Publishers Leichhhardt NSW 2040 Ms Susan Caldis, ACARA Postal Address: PO Box 577 Ms Lorraine Chaer, Gorokan High School Leichhardt, NSW, 2040, Australia Mr Robert Gandiaga, Casula High School Telephone: (02) 9564 3322, Fax: (02) 9564 2342 Ms Pamela Gregg, Retired Website: www.gtansw.org.au Mrs Barbara Heath, Retired Email: [email protected] Mr Keith Hopkins, St Mary Star of the Sea College, Wollongong ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP (Subscriptions include GST) Ms Grace Larobina,
  • Cantonese Connections the Origins of Australia’S Early Chinese Migrants

    Cantonese Connections the Origins of Australia’S Early Chinese Migrants

    GENEALOGY Fannie Chok See, James Choy Hing and their three children, Dorothy May, James and Pauline, in Sydney, 1905. James Choy Hing was from Ngoi Sha village in Chungshan. Image courtesy of the National Archives of Australia: SP244/2, N1950/2/4918 Cantonese connections The origins of Australia’s early Chinese migrants By Dr Kate Bagnall For Australians researching their Chinese family history, discovering their ancestors’ hometown and Chinese name is signifi cant. n a quiet residential street in the inner-city Sydney Temple in Retreat Street, Alexandria, was opened a few suburb of Glebe, on a large grassy block that years later, in 1909. In contrast to the Glebe temple, the stretches down towards the harbour, sits the Sze Yiu Ming Temple is tucked away at the end of a double Yup Kwan Ti Temple. Built between 1898 and row of terraces, also owned by the Yiu Ming Society, all of 1904, the Sze Yup Temple is one of two heritage- which are now surrounded by busy commercial buildings Ilisted temples in Sydney. T e second, the Yiu Ming and apartment blocks. Uncovering the past 43 GENEALOGY Family grouped in front of their home in New South Wales, circa 1880–1910. Image courtesy of the State Library of Victoria In the early years of the 20th century, when the two temples were built, the Chinese population in Sydney and surrounding suburbs was just over 3800, of whom about 200 were women and girls. In Australia as a whole, there were about 33,000 people of Chinese ancestry. Chinese communities around Australia were diverse – in occupation, politics, class and religion, as well as in dialect and hometown.
  • The Chinese Experience in Australia

    The Chinese Experience in Australia

    The Chinese Experience in Australia © ASIA Volume 43 Number 2 79 The Chinese Experience in Australia – A Brief Outline for Stages 3– 5 by Di Dunlop dward Hargraves returned to Australia from California in 1851 where he had experienced the Efrenzy of the Gold Rushes in California. He had previously been at Bathurst in New South Wales and believed that the local rock formations resembled what he had seen in California. He spent time panning in Bathurst, and found gold. On 15 May 1851 the discovery was announced and workers flocked to the area to make their fortunes. By August of that year the interest had shifted to Victoria, because Thomas Hiscock had discovered gold on the rich alluvial flats at Ballarat. Both Geelong and Melbourne were almost emptied of men. By the end of the same year news of the discoveries had spread around the world. Hopefuls came from Ireland, Scotland, England and America. By the end of 1853 the decline in income of the alluvial digger caused him to perceive a wider significance in the difference between the equality and mateship of the goldfields, Banner from 1860 and 1861 anti-Chinese rebellion on the Lambing Flat goldfields, now present day Young, NSW. Source: Wikimedia Commons and the inequality and political and social privilege that prevailed in the society that surrounded him.·1 Chinese had first begun to arrive at t he Victorian Life was difficult and the crime rate was high. The goldfields in large numbers during 1856. By this time administration of the goldfields was harsh and corrupt.
  • Culture and Customs

    Culture and Customs

    Sydney Journal 1(3) December 2008 ISSN 1835-0151 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/ojs/index.php/sydney_journal/index Religion Hilary M Carey The modern city of Sydney has a reputation to uphold for its larrikin spirit, hedonism and resistance to authority – including that represented by organised religion. Just how this reputation was achieved has never been seriously researched but it is usually assumed that Sydney’s convict origins and the number of Irish Catholics in the demographic mix have something to do with it. In fact it is truer to say that religion has had a profound influence on the geography, culture, politics, and artistic life of the city. While religion in Sydney has mostly been a conservative force, preserving traditions transported there from home societies, it has also reflected the setting and people of Sydney, its harbour, bushland and suburbs. This article reviews the history of religion in Sydney and the role it has played in the lives of those who have made their home here. Aboriginal traditions The Aborigines of the Sydney region were divided socially and culturally into dozens of local clans and five main language groups: Guringai to the north, Darkinjung to the north-west of the Hawkesbury, Dharug on the coast (another Dharug dialect was spoken inland), Dharawal from the south side of Botany Bay down to the Shoalhaven, and Gundungurra on the southern rim of the Cumberland plain and west to the Georges River.1 From the observations of Watkin Tench and David Collins in the 1780s, as well as the accounts published by the ethnographer RH Mathews in the 1890s, it can be assumed that the religious beliefs of the Sydney people resembled those described in more detail by the missionary Lancelot Threlkeld (1788–1859) for the people of Lake Macquarie (Awaba) and the Hunter River, whose language and country adjoined that of the Guringai to the north.
  • How to Prepare Archival Records of Heritage Items

    How to Prepare Archival Records of Heritage Items

    HERITAGE INFORMATION SERIES HOW TO PREPARE ARCHIVAL RECORDS OF HERITAGE ITEMS ACKNOWLEDGMENT This document is partially based on a draft publication, Recording Places of Cultural Significance (1991), prepared for the Department of Planning by Meredith Walker & Associates with the financial support of the Heritage Assistance Program. DISCLAIMER Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith but on the basis that the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees are not liable (whether by reason of negligence, lack of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, statement or advice referred to above. NSW Heritage Office Locked Bag 5020 Parramatta NSW 2124 Ph: (02) 9873 8500 Fax: (02) 9873 8599 www.heritage.nsw.gov.au © Crown copyright 1998 3rd edition This edition first published June 1998 ISBN 1 876415 08 8 HO98/19 Front cover graphics: Aboriginal hand stencils, South Coast. Photograph courtesy of National Parks and Wildlife Service Interior of Belltrees shearing shed, built near Scone in NSW in 1879 by architect J. Horbury Hunt. Artefacts from the site of first Government House Archaeology Collection. Photograph courtesy of Museum of Sydney on the site of first Government House Grose Valley, Blue Mountains, NSW. Photograph courtesy of NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Back cover graphics: Australia Square, Sydney Entrance to the central temple, Sze Yup Temple, Glebe. Photograph by Karl Zhao Lands Department Building, Sydney The bow of iron steamer, Merimbula, wrecked near Currarong in 1928.
  • 254 ABC, 77–9, 81, 83, 86, 90–2 ACCA, 64 ACDMA Retirement

    254 ABC, 77–9, 81, 83, 86, 90–2 ACCA, 64 ACDMA Retirement

    Index ABC, 77–9, 81, 83, 86, 90–2 belongingness, 74, 84, 92–3, 147, ACCA, 64 225, 233, 237 ACDMA Retirement Home, 66 Baptist community, 69 across generations, 54, 90 Bhabha, H., 2, 3 act, 7, 45–6, 54 Bhana, S., 189 action, 24, 52, 54, 55, 101–2, 106, Boxer Rebellion, 135 229 Brain, J., 189 African National Congress, 203 Brave Orchid, 213–14, 216–18, 222 aged care, 59, 65, 68 Brubaker, R., 1, 2, 4, 129 alienation, 4, 21, 84, 195, 229, 230 buildings, 53, 55–6, 59–60, 66–7, 69 Alexander, A., 3 built environment, 9, 53, 56 Alexander, M., 5 Bureau of the Overseas Chinese ancestor worship, 120, 124–7 Affairs, 124 ancestral house, 120 see also worship Cabramatta, 64 Anderson, B., 3, 224, 228 Canley Vale, 66 Ang, I., 3, 16, 20, 80, 91 Canton, 19, 190 Anthias, F., 7–8, 21, 247, 249 see also Guangzhou Anxi County in Fujian Province, 114 Cape Colony, 189 apartheid, 10, 187–8, 192–3, 196–8, Cape Colony Chinese Exclusion Act, 201–3 189 archetypal village, 119 Chan, Evans, 241 artefacts, 3, 10, 57, 225 Chan, Peter, 226, 234 Ashfield, 23, 27, 66 Carroll, Lewis, 244 assimilation, 33, 76, 79–80, 92, 148 Cheung, Alfred, 241 As Time Goes By, 241 Cheung, Mabel, 241 attachment, 20, 89, 160, 222, 228, Cheung, Maggie, 229, 234 240 childcare, 59, 60, 65 attachment indicators, 61–2 China, 9, 14–30, 58, 86–90, 96–7, attachment, place, 55–7, 61–3, 70, 104–8, 118–19, 124, 127–8, 74–7, 88–90, 171, 220–1 146–9, 171, 195, 206–7 authentic, 3–7, 9, 17, 82–5, 131, 139, China, mainland, 41, 76, 111, 153, 176, 218, 221–2 206, 214, 225, 234 China, new, 238 Balibar, E., 130,
  • Eyes Gtoo&Rary

    Eyes Gtoo&Rary

    LEl11l~1~i~ ~11~ij 1111~1ij~~11111mRY L 3 4 3486 For Reference in this issue: The City Council Nottobetaken • The City Council eyes Glebe, pl C • The battle for Francis and Glebe Streets, p2 • eyes Gtoo&rary • Clean up Australia - p3 The Lord Mayor of Sydney, Cr Frank Cr Sartor promised that if the City +- Sartor, has begun a campaign to Council gained control of Glebe it • amalgamate several inner city areas would remove greyhound racing from "Our Sporting Heritage" the Glebe programme, p8 1) with the City Council. In particular Wentworth Park and restore it as a • Glebe's ·Son - Edmund Barton, p9 he has targeted the Glebe ward of public park. Leichhardt Council. The following Not surprisingly, the mayors of the • St Helen's Community Centre on Glebe Point Road, p10 information from stories in the Sydney councils concerned, including Morning Herald between 15-17 Leichhardt' s Maire Sheehan, have February is republished below to condemned Cr Sartor' s move. The inform members of what is in the Minister for Local Government said wind. ) We invite members to send us _their comments so that the Management _Com~ittee can trepare ~ statement which the Society wtll send to oth Le1chhardt Council and the City Council. The GLEBE Cr Sartor envisages only six or eight the proposal will not be examined until POSTAGE councils in greater Sydney, with the after the current round of voluntary Box 100 PO PAID City Council taking in the current council amalgamations is completed municipalities of South Sydney, later this year. Woollahra, Waverley, Botany and As Cr Sartor points out, the views of parts of Lcichhardt.
  • Beynon, D. Big Gold Mountain Redux

    Beynon, D. Big Gold Mountain Redux

    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOCIETY OF ARCHITECTURAL HISTORIANS AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND VOL. 33 Edited by AnnMarie Brennan and Philip Goad Published in Melbourne, Australia, by SAHANZ, 2016 ISBN: 978-0-7340-5265-0 The bibliographic citation for this paper is: David Beynon “Big Gold Mountain Redux.” In Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand: 33, Gold, edited by AnnMarie Brennan and Philip Goad, 46-53. Melbourne: SAHANZ, 2016. David Beynon Deakin University BIG GOLD MOUNTAIN REDUX The institutional underpinnings of Australian architectural history have so far treated the long-term Asian influence on its architectural development as a marginal phenomenon. However Chinese settlements were integral to nineteenth- century goldmining towns and associated with the founding of Ararat and the establishment of Daoist/Buddhist temples from South Melbourne to the Atherton Tablelands. This association led to Australia being referred to as Dai Gum San (Big Gold Mountain). More recently, after the long interregnum of the Immigration Restriction Act, Chinese- Australian cultural-architectural engagement has been revived, as more dispersed forms of fortune are again sought on Australian shores. This paper draws upon current institutional thinking about the blurring of the boundaries between traditional and modern, Eastern and Western. It further develops a discourse that provokes ongoing questions about Australia’s architectural identity in a world where, on the one hand, China’s power and influence is steadily growing in economic, political and cultural terms, while on the other, the Chinese diaspora has developed its own local characteristics. This involves reconsideration of the increasingly integral role of Chinese settlers in the development of Australian architecture, as they apply to both the physical changes and flows of people that have resulted from processes of globalisation, but also to the flows of capital and influence that have been formed as a result.
  • 357 Glebe Point Road Glebe.Indd

    357 Glebe Point Road Glebe.Indd

    357 Glebe Point Road, Glebe Conservation Management Plan September 2015 Graham Brooks & Associates Pty Ltd Incorporated in NSW Architects, Planners & Heritage Consultants 71 York St, Level 1 Sydney 2000 Australia Tel: (61) 2 9299 8600 Issues Descriptions Date Issued By Fax: (61) 2 9299 8711 Email: [email protected] A Draft for Review 31/8/15 DM www.gbaheritage.com B Amended Draft for Review 10/9/15 DM ABN: 56 073 802 730 C Issued for Submission 11/9/15 DM ACN: 073 802 730 Nominated Architect: Graham Leslie Brooks D Minor Revisions 25/9/15 DM NSW Architects Registration: 3836 2 Contents 1.0 Introduction 5 1.1 Background 5 1.2 Report Objectives 5 1.3 Report Structure 5 1.4 Site Identification 5 1.5 Nomenclature 6 1.6 Authorship 6 1.7 Report Limitations 6 1.8 Acknowledgements 7 1.9 Copyright 7 2.0 Historical Summary 8 2.1 The Glebe 1790-1840 8 2.2 The Boissier Estate, 1840-1857 8 2.3 Mr Blacket’s House, 1857-1870 9 2.4 New Ownership and Ballroom, 1870-1877 10 2.5 Subsequent Residential Use, 1877-1920 11 2.6 The Depot for State Children and the Metropolitan Girls’ Shelter 1920-1977 12 2.7 The Remand Centre 1980-2017 15 2.8 Summary of Site Development 18 3.0 Physical Evidence 24 3.1 Introduction 24 3.2 Urban Context 24 3.3 The Subject Site 24 3.4 Description of the Buildings 26 3.5 Views to and from the Site 42 4.0 Assessment of Cultural Significance 43 4.1 Introduction 43 4.2 Comparative Analysis 44 4.3 Analysis of Cultural Significance 48 4.4 Statement of Significance 51 4.5 Grading of Significance 52 4.6 Curtilage Analysis 56 5.0