<<

Clinical Cancer Molecular Pathways Research

Molecular Pathways: Regulation of Metabolism by RB

Brian F. Clem and Jason Chesney

Abstract The discovery of the retinoblastoma (RB-1) as a tumor suppressor that is disrupted in a majority of human cancers either via direct or indirect genetic alterations has resulted in increased interest in its functions and downstream effectors. Although the canonical pathway that links this tumor suppressor to human cancers details its interaction with the E2F factors and cell-cycle progression, recent studies have shown an essential role for RB-1 in the suppression of glycolytic and glutaminolytic metabolism. Characterization of the precise metabolic transporters and enzymes suppressed by the RB- E2F axis should enable the identification of antagonists that have selective and potent antitumor properties. Clin Cancer Res; 18(22); 6096–100. 2012 AACR.

Background anomas, and hepatocellular carcinomas, causes the activa- In the early 1970s, Alfred Knudson described a statistical tion of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) that phosphory- study of 48 cases of a rare childhood malignancy, retino- late and suppress the activity of RB-1 (5, 6). Given that RB-1 blastoma, which indicated that only 2 mutational events introduction of wild-type RB-1 into negative cancer were required for its development (1). Subsequent pedi- cells suppresses their anchorage-independent growth in soft gree analyses of retinoblastoma patients identified a linked agar and as tumors in mice (7), RB-1 became known as the locus on chromosome 13 (2) and, within this locus, the first gene to fulfill the equivalent of Koch’s postulates for a retinoblastoma target gene RB-1 was sequenced by Lee and tumor suppressor. On the basis of these prior genetic and colleagues in the 1980s (3). Multiple RB-1 deletions and biologic studies, it is now anticipated that understanding mutations that prevent the expression and function of the precise biochemical functions of RB-1 will identify the normal retinoblastoma product (RB-1) were that become activated from the loss of RB-1 and then identified in retinoblastomas (4) and the two-hit that have utility as molecular targets for the development of hypothesis by Knudson was supported by the observations novel chemotherapeutic approaches. that one mutated allele and one wild-type allele were Canonical Function of RB in Cell-Cycle present in normal, somatic cells of hereditary retinoblas- Regulation toma patients whereas their retinoblastomas contained 2 mutated alleles (3). In normal cells, activation of signaling pathways down- Apart from retinoblastoma, genetic alterations of RB-1 stream of growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases causes also have been found in in osteosarcomas, renal cell carci- increased expression of D-type cyclins that form the regu- nomas, soft-tissue sarcomas, and adenocarcinomas of latory domains of CDK-4 and CDK-6 to enhance catalytic breast, lung (small cell), prostate, cervix, and the bladder, activity and nuclear translocation (8). Activated CDKs suggesting an extensive role for RB dysfunction in the phosphorylate RB-1, which causes its dissociation from the development of human cancers (4). In addition, mutations E2F transcription factors that, depending on their RB-bind- of gene products that lead to suppression of RB function ing state, modulate the expression of such as CDC25A have been found to be a ubiquitous feature of malignancies. that are essential for the G1/S cell-cycle progression (9). INK4A For example, genetic loss of p16 , which is common in Perhaps not surprisingly, overexpression of wild-type RB-1 RB-1 non–small cell lung and pancreatic adenocarcinomas, mel- protein in negative cells in the early G1 phase of the cell-cycle causes a G1 arrest and cytostasis (10). The E2F family consists of nine distinct members, which are differ- entiated by their putative activator (E2F-1, 2, 3a) or repres- Authors' Affiliation: Department of Medicine, Molecular Targets Group, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, sor functions (E2F-3b, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). RB-1 associates specif- Kentucky ically with the E2F activator transcription factors and, when Corresponding Authors: Jason Chesney, Department of Medicine, bound, recruits selective corepressor complexes, such as Molecular Targets Group, James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University deacetylases (HDAC), to silence gene transcription of Louisville, 529 S. Jackson Street, Louisville, KY 40202. Phone: 502-852- 3679; E-mail: [email protected] and Brian F. Clem, 505 S. (11–15). Although the precise mechanisms for RB-E2F- Hancock Street, CTRB, Rm. 422, Louisville, KY 40202. Phone: 502-852- mediated modulation of remain contro- 8427; E-mail: [email protected] versial, several developmental mouse models in which E2F doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3164 activators have been genetically deleted support this canon- 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. ical pathway (9).

6096 Clin Cancer Res; 18(22) November 15, 2012

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. RB and Metabolism

Control of Glucose Metabolism by RB function causes an increase in glycolysis, a hallmark of Until recently, the central dogma related to mutations cancer. that facilitate neoplastic transformation by disabling the Entry of glucose carbons into the TCA is largely mediated RB-E2F suppressive activity supported a scenario whereby by conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA through the activity loss of RB function resulted in transcriptional upregulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH). PDH activity is inhib- of cell-cycle mediators which in turn caused a shift in the ited through phosphorylation by members of the pyruvate diffusion of nutrients and biosynthetic enzyme equilibria. dehydrogenase kinase (PDK) family, and several oncogenes However, an early indication that RB-E2F might directly and protumorigenic factors regulate the activity of PDKs regulate metabolic enzyme expression came from the obser- (37–39). For example, whereas c-Myc activity under normal vation that two enzymes required for nucleotide synthesis, oxygen tension increases mitochondrial glucose oxidation, thymidine kinase (TK1) and dihydrofolate reductase c-Myc coordinates with hypoxia-stabilized HIF-1a to stim- (DHFR), are direct transcriptional targets of E2F family ulate the expression of PDK1, thereby suppressing PDH members (16–23). Because RB suppresses the transcription function and glycolytic flux into the TCA (40). RB-E2F-1 of these nucleotide biosynthetic enzyme mRNAs via phys- also is able to block glucose oxidation under normoxia ical interaction with E2Fs, investigators postulated that RB through another PDK family member, PDK4, which has might also suppress the transcription of mRNAs required to been identified as a direct transcriptional target of Rb-E2F-1, translate the multitude of regulators, transporters, and and loss of E2F-1 or RB function causes increased PDK4 enzymes required for energetic and anabolic metabolism. expression and reduction of glucose oxidation (41, 42). Glycolysis provides carbons required for the synthesis of Taken together, these studies suggest that glycolytic flux into ribose, amino acids, lipids, and ATP necessary for biomass the TCA cycle may be determined not only by oxygen expansion and cytokinesis. Early studies identified elevated availability, but also by distinct combinations of tumor- glycolytic enzyme expression and activity levels in retino- promoting mutations. blastomas. For example, the expression of the first enzyme of the glycolytic pathway, hexokinase (isozyme II), is signifi- Control of Mitochondrial Glutaminolysis and cantly elevated in retinoblastomas relative to the normal Biogenesis by RB retina (24) and the glycolytic hub enzyme, lactate dehydro- Reduced glycolytic flux into the TCA as a result of RB-1 genase (LDH), has been found to be activated in the aqueous deletion may result in the preferential use of glutamine- humor surrounding retinoblastomas compared with non- derived carbons to replenish TCA intermediates for reduc- malignant ocular disorders (25). The precise mechanisms ing equivalents (e.g., NADH) required for oxidative phos- for increased expression and activity of glycolytic enzymes in phorylation and for the synthesis of TCA-derived macro- retinoblastomas as well as other RB-1 deleted cancers have molecules (43–46). In addition, glutamate, a product of not been completely defined. However, derepressed E2F-1 the glutaminases, functions as an essential precursor for activity leads to increased expression of c-Myc through direct the production of glutathione, which serves as a reductive transcriptional activation of the MYC , and the role sink for reactive oxygen species and thiol-containing of c-Myc in stimulating glycolytic flux to lactate is well proteins (47). Over the last 10 years, the activation of established via its control of glycolytic mRNAs including several oncogenes and deletion of tumor suppressors GLUT1, HK2, PKM2, and LDH-A (26–29). In addition, loss have been found to regulate glutaminolysis via direct of RB function in 3T3 fibroblasts causes a 30-fold increase in modulation of glutamine transporters and glutaminase. activated Ras whereas restoration of wild-type RB in these Importantly, overexpression of c-Myc increases expres- cells reverses this activation (30, 31). Ras induces the sion of glutamine transporters and glutaminase 1 (GLS1) expression of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase 3 (PFKFB3), whose along with concomitant and obligatory reliance on glu- product, fructose-2,6-bisphosphate, allosterically activates tamine for survival (48–50). Given the symbiotic inter- the first committed and irreversible step of glycolysis, 6- action between oncogenes and tumor suppressors that phosphofructo-1-kinase, which in turn results in increased drives neoplastic transformation (51), it is not surprising glycolytic flux to lactate (32, 33). Furthermore, the down- that genetic deletion of the RB family in mouse embry- stream Ras effector kinase AKT can directly phosphorylate onic fibroblasts also causes increased glutamine uptake and stimulate PFKFB3 activity (34), which, combined with and usage via elevated expression of the glutamine trans- c-Myc-mediated induction of glucose transporters and gly- porter ASCT2 and the activity of GLS1 (52). Furthermore, colytic enzyme mRNAs, may synergistically increase glyco- exposure to a physiologic concentration of glutamine has lytic flux to lactate. Importantly, cells lacking a functional RB been found to markedly increase oxygen consumption, pathway also have been found to express elevated phos- ATPproduction,andglutathione formation in RB-null phorylated-AKT and mTOR, which, through the action of cells relative to RB wild-type cells, indicating high reliance mTORC2, can suppress the nuclear translocation of Foxo3a on glutaminolysis as a result of an inactive RB pathway. (35), a negative regulator of the proglycolytic transcription Importantly, the effects of RB deletion are mediated in factor HIF-1a (36). Taken together, there is substantial, part by the RB-E2F cascade as ChIP analysis has revealed albeit indirect, evidence that activation of the RB-E2F path- specific E2F family members associated with promoter way suppresses glucose metabolism and that loss of RB regions of glutaminolytic enzymes (52). Together, these

www.aacrjournals.org Clin Cancer Res; 18(22) November 15, 2012 6097

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Clem and Chesney

studies extend the tumor suppressor role of the RB-E2F genes involved in electron transport chain activity and oxi- pathway to a metabolic pathway, glutaminolysis that is dative phosphorylation have been found to be directly essential for the promotion of the growth and survival of suppressedbyRB-E2F-1,includingsubunitsofATPsynthase, neoplastic cells and identifies several metabolic enzymes cytochrome c oxidase, ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, that may be useful for the development of novel anti- and the succinate dehydrogenase complex (41). Combined, neoplastic strategies. these reports suggest that dysfunction of RB should facilitate Recent studies also have showed a direct role for the RB- the usage of glutamine for oxidative phosphorylation. E2F interaction in mitochondrial biogenesis and electron transport chain activity, both of which are involved in – glutaminolysis. Adipocyte-specific deletion of RB causes Clinical Translational Advances increased expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated Targeting the loss of RB-E2F function in cancer receptor g co-activator 1-a (PGC-1a) and Several metabolic transporters and enzymes that are related a (ERRa), which directly promote mitochondrial transcriptionally repressed by the RB-E2F pathway may transcription, biogenesis, and oxygen consumption (53). prove useful as targets for the development of antineoplastic This has been similarly observed in gastrocnemius myocytes agents (Fig. 1). For example, gossypol and its derivatives are À À from E2F-1 / knockout animals (41). In addition, several competitive inhibitors of the NADH binding site of the RB-

Glucose Glutamine

GLUT1 ASCT2 Ribose-5P Glucose Glutamine HK2 GLS1

Ras G6P Glutamate X5P c-Myc ؉؉؉ F6P PFK1 Mitochondria F26BP H+ Rb HIF-1α F16P IV PFKFB3 III ATP II E2Fs – + DHA G3P I 2e 2H + Rb NAD ½O2 → H2O E2Fs NADH c-Myc

PEP Acetyl CoA TCA Cycle PK-M2 PDH PDKs Pyruvate LDH-A

Lactate

© 2012 American Association for Cancer Research

Figure 1. The prototypical tumor suppressor RB-1 has pleiotropic inhibitory effects on metabolism. Deletions of RB-1 or certain E2Fs that result in the loss of RB-1–mediated transcriptional control have been found to directly and/or indirectly increase the expression of several key mediators of glycolysis, glutaminolysis, electron transport chain activity, and mitochondrial biogenesis including Ras, HIF-1a, and c-Myc. These signaling proteins and transcription factors increase the expression of metabolic transporters and enzymes causing a reprogramming of metabolic usage that supports the enhanced energetic and anabolic requirements of immortalized and transformed cells. In addition, the RB-1–E2F axis can directly regulate the expression of PDK4 and the glutamine transporter ASCT2, which can stimulate glycolytic flux to lactate and glutaminolysis, respectively. Black lines indicate suppression and red lines indicate stimulation of activity and/or expression of the final enzyme or transporter. Key regulators, transporters, and enzymes are highlighted in red.

6098 Clin Cancer Res; 18(22) November 15, 2012 Clinical Cancer Research

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. RB and Metabolism

E2F-c-Myc target LDH that inhibits xenograft growth in Summary mice (54) and another target, Glut1, confers sensitivity to The discovery of mutations that disrupt the activities of the hexokinase inhibitor, 3-bromopyruvate (3BP; ref. 55). the RB-E2F pathway in a majority of human cancers has In addition, a competitive antagonist of the PFKFB family of highlighted the clinical importance of downstream effector glycolytic regulators was recently discovered, 3-(3-pyridi- enzymes that regulate cell-cycle progression. More recent nyl)-1-(4-pyridinyl)-2-propen-1-one (termed 3PO), that studies have showed that this pathway also regulates the reduces the glucose uptake, intracellular F2,6BP, lactate expression and activities of several metabolic transporters in vitro secretion, steady-state concentration of ATP, and and enzymes that are required for the production of ATP and in vivo growth of multiple transformed cells (56). V12 and anabolic precursors. Given that these metabolic effector Importantly, H-Ras –transformed bronchial epithelial proteins are directly suppressed by the RB-E2F axis and are cells that have low RB function are markedly more sensitive required for the immortalization and subsequent transfor- to the cytotoxic effects of 3PO than are normal bronchial mation of normal cells into neoplastic cells, small molecule epithelial cells (56). Finally, the induction of glutaminolysis antagonists that target their substrate-binding domains may RB in -null cells indicates that this metabolic pathway may have selective antitumor properties. be selectively required for their survival and growth. Indeed, RB glutamine withdrawal is cytotoxic to -null cells and the Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest cells can be rescued by the addition of the TCA cycle No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed. intermediate, a-ketoglutarate (52). These studies suggest that suppression of glutamine metabolism may be cata- Authors' Contributions strophic to RB-deficient tumors. Unfortunately, glutamine Conception and design: B.F. Clem, J. Chesney Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: B.F. Clem, J. Chesney antagonists have not been proven to be effective in clinical trials (for example, ref. 57) thereby highlighting the need for Acknowledgments a more targeted therapeutic approach against enzymes We thank Drs. Abdullah Yalcin, John Eaton, Alden Klarer, Yoannis whose activity may be altered in neoplastic cells lacking RB Imbert-Fernandez, and Sucheta Telang for their review and comments. function. For example, several small molecular inhibitors Because of space limitations, the authors apologize for the exclusion of primary references and the lack of detailed discussion on the RB-E2F of glutaminase, including BPTES and compound 968, have regulatory pathway. been found to have potent antitumor activities (58, 59). To validate these approaches and justify clinical trials, Grant Support analyses of the relative sensitivities of RB-null human cancer This work was supported by NIH/NCRR 3P20RR018733-09 (B.F. Clem) cells versus RB wild-type normal cells to pharmacologic and NIH/NCI 1RO1CA149438-01 (J. Chesney). inhibition of the RB-E2F-regulated metabolic enzymes are Received August 20, 2012; accepted August 23, 2012; published online necessary. November 15, 2012.

References 1. Knudson AG Jr. Mutation and cancer: statistical study of retinoblas- 11. Brehm A, Kouzarides T. meets chromatin. toma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1971;68:820–3. Trends Biochem Sci 1999;24:142–5. 2. Strong LC, Riccardi VM, Ferrell RE, Sparkes RS. Familial retinoblas- 12. Dyson N. The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev toma and chromosome 13 deletion transmitted via an insertional 1998;12:2245–62. translocation. Science 1981;213:1501–3. 13. Harbour JW, Dean DC. and Rb activity. Curr 3. Lee WH, Bookstein R, Hong F, Young LJ, Shew JY, Lee EY. Human Opin Cell Biol 2000;12:685–9. retinoblastoma susceptibility gene: cloning, identification, and 14. Nevins JR. Toward an understanding of the functional complexity sequence. Science 1987;235:1394–9. of the E2F and retinoblastoma families. Cell Growth Differ 1998;9: 4. Goodrich DW, Lee WH. Molecular characterization of the retinoblas- 585–93. toma susceptibility gene. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993;1155:43–61. 15. Trimarchi JM, Lees JA. Sibling rivalry in the E2F family. Nat Rev Mol Cell 5. Burkhart DL, Sage J. Cellular mechanisms of tumour suppression by Biol 2002;3:11–20. the retinoblastoma gene. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:671–82. 16. Anderson MM, Chen J, Cole CN, Conrad SE. Activation of the human 6. Knudsen ES, Knudsen KE. Tailoring to RB: tumour suppressor status thymidine kinase (TK) promoter by simian virus 40 large T antigen and therapeutic response. Nat Rev Cancer 2008;8:714–24. requires both the T antigen pRb family-binding domain and TK promoter 7. Huang HJ, Yee JK, Shew JY, Chen PL, Bookstein R, Friedmann T, et al. sequences resembling E2F-binding sites. J Virol 1996;70:6304–13. Suppression of the neoplastic phenotype by replacement of the RB 17. Dou QP, Markell PJ, Pardee AB. Thymidine kinase transcription is gene in human cancer cells. Science 1988;242:1563–6. regulated at G1/S phase by a complex that contains retinoblastoma- 8. Paternot S, Bockstaele L, Bisteau X, Kooken H, Coulonval K, Roger PP. like protein and a cdc2 kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89: Rb inactivation in cell cycle and cancer: the puzzle of highly regulated 3256–60. activating phosphorylation of CDK4 versus constitutively active CDK- 18. Dou QP, Zhao S, Levin AH, Wang J, Helin K, Pardee AB. G1/S- activating kinase. Cell Cycle 2010;9:689–99. regulated E2F-containing protein complexes bind to the mouse thy- 9. Chen HZ, Tsai SY, Leone G. Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: an exit midine kinase gene promoter. J Biol Chem 1994;269:1306–13. from cell cycle control. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:785–97. 19. Fry CJ, Pearson A, Malinowski E, Bartley SM, Greenblatt J, Farnham 10. Goodrich DW, Wang NP, Qian YW, Lee EY, Lee WH. The retinoblas- PJ. Activation of the murine dihydrofolate reductase promoter by toma gene product regulates progression through the G1 phase of the E2F1. A requirement for CBP recruitment. J Biol Chem 1999;274: cell cycle. Cell 1991;67:293–302. 15883–91.

www.aacrjournals.org Clin Cancer Res; 18(22) November 15, 2012 6099

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Clem and Chesney

20. Jensen DE, Black AR, Swick AG, Azizkhan JC. Distinct roles for Sp1 40. Kim JW, Gao P, Liu YC, Semenza GL, Dang CV. Hypoxia-inducible and E2F sites in the growth/cell cycle regulation of the DHFR promoter. factor 1 and dysregulated c-Myc cooperatively induce vascular endo- J Cell Biochem 1997;67:24–31. thelial growth factor and metabolic switches hexokinase 2 and pyru- 21. Luo RX, Postigo AA, Dean DC. Rb interacts with to vate dehydrogenase kinase 1. Mol Cell Biol 2007;27:7381–93. repress transcription. Cell 1998;92:463–73. 41. Blanchet E, Annicotte JS, Lagarrigue S, Aguilar V, Clape C, Chavey C, 22. Tommasi S, Pfeifer GP. Constitutive protection of E2F recognition et al. E2F -1 regulates oxidative metabolism. Nat sequences in the human thymidine kinase promoter during cell cycle Cell Biol 2011;13:1146–52. progression. J Biol Chem 1997;272:30483–90. 42. Hsieh MC, Das D, Sambandam N, Zhang MQ, Nahle Z. Regulation of 23. Wade M, Kowalik TF, Mudryj M, Huang ES, Azizkhan JC. E2F mediates the PDK4 isozyme by the Rb-E2F1 complex. J Biol Chem 2008;283: dihydrofolate reductase promoter activation and multiprotein complex 27410–7. formation in human cytomegalovirus infection. Mol Cell Biol 1992;12: 43. DeBerardinis RJ, Cheng T. Q's next: the diverse functions of glutamine 4364–74. in metabolism, cell biology and cancer. Oncogene 2009;29:313–24. 24. Beemer FA, Vlug AM, Rijksen G, Hamburg A, Staal GE. Characteriza- 44. DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Daikhin E, Nissim I, Yudkoff M, Wehrli tion of some glycolytic enzymes from human retina and retinoblasto- S, et al. Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in ma. Cancer Res 1982;42:4228–32. glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein 25. Dias PL, Shanmuganathan SS, Rajaratnam M. Lactic dehydrogenase and nucleotide synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104: activity of aqueous humour in retinoblastoma. Br J Ophthalmol 19345–50. 1971;55:130–2. 45. Deberardinis RJ, Sayed N, Ditsworth D, Thompson CB. Brick by brick: 26. Kim JW, Zeller KI, Wang Y, Jegga AG, Aronow BJ, O'Donnell KA, et al. metabolism and tumor cell growth. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2008;18: Evaluation of myc E-box phylogenetic footprints in glycolytic genes by 54–61. chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24: 46. Wise DR, Thompson CB. Glutamine : a new therapeutic 5923–36. target in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci 2010;35:427–33. 27. Osthus RC, Shim H, Kim S, Li Q, Reddy R, Mukherjee M, et al. 47. Le A, Lane AN, Hamaker M, Bose S, Gouw A, Barbi J, et al. Glucose- Deregulation of glucose transporter 1 and glycolytic gene expression independent glutamine metabolism via TCA cycling for proliferation by c-Myc. J Biol Chem 2000;275:21797–800. and survival in B cells. Cell Metab 2012;15:110–21. 28. Shim H, Dolde C, Lewis BC, Wu CS, Dang G, Jungmann RA, et al. 48. Gao P, Tchernyshyov I, Chang TC, Lee YS, Kita K, Ochi T, et al. c-Myc c-Myc transactivation of LDH-A: implications for tumor metabolism suppression of miR-23a/b enhances mitochondrial glutaminase and growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:6658–63. expression and glutamine metabolism. Nature 2009;458:762–5. 29. Dang CV, Le A, Gao P. MYC-induced cancer cell energy metabolism 49. Wise DR, DeBerardinis RJ, Mancuso A, Sayed N, Zhang XY, Pfeiffer and therapeutic opportunities. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:6479–83. HK, et al. Myc regulates a transcriptional program that stimulates 30. Lee KY, Ladha MH, McMahon C, Ewen ME. The retinoblastoma protein mitochondrial glutaminolysis and leads to glutamine addiction. Proc is linked to the activation of Ras. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:7724–32. Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:18782–7. 31. Raptis L, Brownell HL, Corbley MJ, Wood KW, Wang D, Haliotis T. 50. Yuneva M, Zamboni N, Oefner P, Sachidanandam R, Lazebnik Y. Cellular ras gene activity is required for full neoplastic transformation Deficiency in glutamine but not glucose induces MYC-dependent by the large tumor antigen of SV40. Cell Growth Differ 1997;8:891–901. apoptosis in human cells. J Cell Biol 2007;178:93–105. 32. Chesney J, Telang S. Regulation of glycolytic and mitochondrial 51. Berger AH, Knudson AG, Pandolfi PP. A continuum model for tumour metabolism by Ras. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012 Jun 1 [Epub ahead suppression. Nature 2011;476:163–9. of print]. 52. Reynolds M, Clem BF. Unpublished observations. 33. Telang S, Yalcin A, Clem AL, Bucala R, Lane AN, Eaton JW, et al. Ras 53. Dali-Youcef N, Mataki C, Coste A, Messaddeq N, Giroud S, Blanc S, transformation requires metabolic control by 6-phosphofructo-2- et al. Adipose tissue-specific inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein kinase. Oncogene 2006;25:7225–34. protects against diabesity because of increased energy expenditure. 34. Deprez J, Vertommen D, Alessi DR, Hue L, Rider MH. Phosphorylation Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:10703–8. and activation of heart 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase by protein kinase B 54. Le A, Cooper CR, Gouw AM, Dinavahi R, Maitra A, Deck LM, et al. and other protein kinases of the insulin signaling cascades. J Biol Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A induces oxidative stress and Chem 1997;272:17269–75. inhibits tumor progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107: 35. El-Naggar S, Liu Y, Dean DC. Mutation of the Rb1 pathway leads to 2037–42. overexpression of mTor, constitutive phosphorylation of Akt on serine 55. Yun J, Rago C, Cheong I, Pagliarini R, Angenendt P, Rajagopalan H, 473, resistance to anoikis, and a block in c-Raf activation. Mol Cell Biol et al. Glucose deprivation contributes to the development of KRAS 2009;29:5710–7. pathway mutations in tumor cells. Science 2009;325:1555–9. 36. Emerling BM, Weinberg F, Liu JL, Mak TW, Chandel NS. PTEN 56. Clem B, Telang S, Clem A, Yalcin A, Meier J, Simmons A, et al. Small- regulates p300-dependent hypoxia-inducible factor 1 transcriptional molecule inhibition of 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase activity suppresses activity through Forkhead transcription factor 3a (FOXO3a). Proc Natl glycolytic flux and tumor growth. Mol Cancer Ther 2008;7:110–20. Acad Sci U S A 2008;105:2622–7. 57. Bonomi P, Finkelstein D, Chang A. Phase II trial of acivicin versus 37. Holness MJ, Sugden MC. Regulation of pyruvate dehydrogenase etoposide-cisplatin in non-small cell . An Eastern Coop- complex activity by reversible phosphorylation. Biochem Soc Trans erative Oncology Group study. Am J Clin Oncol 1994;17:215–7. 2003;31:1143–51. 58. Robinson MM, McBryant SJ, Tsukamoto T, Rojas C, Ferraris DV, 38. Sugden MC, Holness MJ. Mechanisms underlying regulation of the Hamilton SK, et al. Novel mechanism of inhibition of rat kidney-type expression and activities of the mammalian pyruvate dehydrogenase glutaminase by bis-2-(5-phenylacetamido-1,2,4-thiadiazol-2-yl)ethyl kinases. Arch Physiol Biochem 2006;112:139–49. sulfide (BPTES). Biochem J 2007;406:407–14. 39. Kim JW, Tchernyshyov I, Semenza GL, Dang CV. HIF-1-mediated 59. Wang JB, Erickson JW, Fuji R, Ramachandran S, Gao P, Dinavahi R, expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch et al. Targeting mitochondrial glutaminase activity inhibits oncogenic required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab 2006;3:177–85. transformation. Cancer Cell 2010;18:207–19.

6100 Clin Cancer Res; 18(22) November 15, 2012 Clinical Cancer Research

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research. Molecular Pathways: Regulation of Metabolism by RB

Brian F. Clem and Jason Chesney

Clin Cancer Res 2012;18:6096-6100.

Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/18/22/6096

Cited articles This article cites 57 articles, 32 of which you can access for free at: http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/18/22/6096.full#ref-list-1

Citing articles This article has been cited by 6 HighWire-hosted articles. Access the articles at: http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/18/22/6096.full#related-urls

E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.

Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Department at Subscriptions [email protected].

Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/18/22/6096. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.

Downloaded from clincancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 24, 2021. © 2012 American Association for Cancer Research.