Nematode Genome Evolution*
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Damage Sensor Associated with the Cuticle Coordinates Three Core Environmental Stress Responses in Caenorhabditis Elegans
HIGHLIGHTED ARTICLE | INVESTIGATION A Damage Sensor Associated with the Cuticle Coordinates Three Core Environmental Stress Responses in Caenorhabditis elegans William Dodd,*,1 Lanlan Tang,*,1 Jean-Christophe Lone,† Keon Wimberly,* Cheng-Wei Wu,* Claudia Consalvo,* Joni E. Wright,* Nathalie Pujol,†,2 and Keith P. Choe*,2 *Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611 and †Aix Marseille University, CNRS, INSERM, CIML, Marseille, France ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8889-3197 (N.P.) ABSTRACT Extracellular matrix barriers and inducible cytoprotective genes form successive lines of defense against chemical and microbial environmental stressors. The barrier in nematodes is a collagenous extracellular matrix called the cuticle. In Caenorhabditis elegans, disruption of some cuticle collagen genes activates osmolyte and antimicrobial response genes. Physical damage to the epidermis also activates antimicrobial responses. Here, we assayed the effect of knocking down genes required for cuticle and epidermal integrity on diverse cellular stress responses. We found that disruption of specific bands of collagen, called annular furrows, coactivates detoxification, hyperosmotic, and antimicrobial response genes, but not other stress responses. Disruption of other cuticle structures and epidermal integrity does not have the same effect. Several transcription factors act downstream of furrow loss. SKN-1/ Nrf and ELT-3/GATA are required for detoxification, SKN-1/Nrf is partially required for the osmolyte response, and STA-2/Stat and ELT- 3/GATA for antimicrobial gene expression. Our results are consistent with a cuticle-associated damage sensor that coordinates de- toxification, hyperosmotic, and antimicrobial responses through overlapping, but distinct, downstream signaling. KEYWORDS damage sensor; collagen; detoxification; osmotic stress; antimicrobial response XTRACELLULAR matrices (ECMs) are ubiquitous features Internal and epidermal tissues secrete ECMs as mechanical Eof animal tissues composed of secreted fibrous proteins support. -
A Transparent Window Into Biology: a Primer on Caenorhabditis Elegans* Ann K
A Transparent window into biology: A primer on Caenorhabditis elegans* Ann K. Corsi1§, Bruce Wightman2§, and Martin Chalfie3§ 1Biology Department, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC 20064 2Biology Department, Muhlenberg College, Allentown, PA 18104 3Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................2 2. C. elegans basics .....................................................................................................................4 2.1. Growth and maintenance ................................................................................................ 4 2.2. Sexual forms and their importance .................................................................................... 5 2.3. Life cycle ....................................................................................................................7 3. C. elegans genetics ...................................................................................................................8 4. Why choose C. elegans? ......................................................................................................... 10 5. C. elegans tissues ................................................................................................................... 11 5.1. Epidermis: a model for extracellular matrix production, wound healing, and cell fusion ............ 12 5.2. Muscles—controlling -
Species Richness, Distribution and Genetic Diversity of Caenorhabditis Nematodes in a Remote Tropical Rainforest
Species richness, distribution and genetic diversity of Caenorhabditis nematodes in a remote tropical rainforest. Marie-Anne Félix, Richard Jovelin, Céline Ferrari, Shery Han, Young Ran Cho, Erik Andersen, Asher Cutter, Christian Braendle To cite this version: Marie-Anne Félix, Richard Jovelin, Céline Ferrari, Shery Han, Young Ran Cho, et al.. Species richness, distribution and genetic diversity of Caenorhabditis nematodes in a remote tropical rainforest.. BMC Evolutionary Biology, BioMed Central, 2013, 13 (1), pp.10. 10.1186/1471-2148-13-10. inserm- 00781427 HAL Id: inserm-00781427 https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00781427 Submitted on 26 Jan 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Félix et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2013, 13:10 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/10 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access Species richness, distribution and genetic diversity of Caenorhabditis nematodes in a remote tropical rainforest Marie-Anne Félix1†, Richard Jovelin2†, Céline Ferrari3,4,5, Shery Han2, Young Ran Cho2, Erik C Andersen6, Asher D Cutter2 and Christian Braendle3,4,5* Abstract Background: In stark contrast to the wealth of detail about C. elegans developmental biology and molecular genetics, biologists lack basic data for understanding the abundance and distribution of Caenorhabditis species in natural areas that are unperturbed by human influence. -
Revisiting Suppression of Interspecies Hybrid Male Lethality In
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/102053; this version posted January 20, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Revisiting suppression of interspecies hybrid male lethality in Caenorhabditis nematodes Lauren E. Ryan and Eric S. Haag* Department of Biology and Biological Sciences Program University of Maryland, College Park MD USA * Correspondence: E.S. Haag, Dept. of Biology, Univ. of Maryland, 4094 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740 [email protected] bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/102053; this version posted January 20, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Within the nematode genus Caenorhabditis, C. briggsae and C. nigoni are among the most closely related species known. They differ in sexual mode, with C. nigoni retaining the ancestral XO male-XX female outcrossing system, while C. briggsae females recently evolved self- fertility and an XX-biased sex ratio. Wild-type C. briggsae and C. nigoni can produce fertile hybrid XX female progeny, but XO progeny are either 100% inviable (when C. briggsae is the mother) or viable but sterile (when C. nigoni is the mother). A recent study provided evidence suggesting that loss of the Cbr-him-8 meiotic regulator in C. -
"Structure, Function and Evolution of the Nematode Genome"
Structure, Function and Advanced article Evolution of The Article Contents . Introduction Nematode Genome . Main Text Online posting date: 15th February 2013 Christian Ro¨delsperger, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tuebingen, Germany Adrian Streit, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tuebingen, Germany Ralf J Sommer, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tuebingen, Germany In the past few years, an increasing number of draft gen- numerous variations. In some instances, multiple alter- ome sequences of multiple free-living and parasitic native forms for particular developmental stages exist, nematodes have been published. Although nematode most notably dauer juveniles, an alternative third juvenile genomes vary in size within an order of magnitude, com- stage capable of surviving long periods of starvation and other adverse conditions. Some or all stages can be para- pared with mammalian genomes, they are all very small. sitic (Anderson, 2000; Community; Eckert et al., 2005; Nevertheless, nematodes possess only marginally fewer Riddle et al., 1997). The minimal generation times and the genes than mammals do. Nematode genomes are very life expectancies vary greatly among nematodes and range compact and therefore form a highly attractive system for from a few days to several years. comparative studies of genome structure and evolution. Among the nematodes, numerous parasites of plants and Strikingly, approximately one-third of the genes in every animals, including man are of great medical and economic sequenced nematode genome has no recognisable importance (Lee, 2002). From phylogenetic analyses, it can homologues outside their genus. One observes high rates be concluded that parasitic life styles evolved at least seven of gene losses and gains, among them numerous examples times independently within the nematodes (four times with of gene acquisition by horizontal gene transfer. -
Web Resources for C. Elegans Studies* §
Web resources for C. elegans studies* § Raymond Lee , Division of Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 2. Portal and knowledge environment .............................................................................................. 2 2.1. WormBase ...................................................................................................................2 2.2. Caenorhabditis elegans WWW Server ..............................................................................3 3. Literature search ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.1. Textpresso ................................................................................................................... 4 3.2. NCBI PubMed ..............................................................................................................5 3.3. Caenorhabditis elegans WWW Server Worm Literature Index ............................................... 5 4. Gene function .........................................................................................................................6 4.1. WormBase Gene Summary ............................................................................................. 6 4.2. NCBI AceView ........................................................................................................... -
TGF-Β Signaling in C. Elegans * Tina L
TGF-β signaling in C. elegans * Tina L. Gumienny1 and Cathy Savage-Dunn2§ 1Department of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, College Station, TX 77843 USA 2Department of Biology, Queens College, and the Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367 USA Table of Contents 1. Overview ...............................................................................................................................2 2. DBL-1 pathway .......................................................................................................................4 2.1. Body size regulation ...................................................................................................... 5 2.2. Male tail development .................................................................................................... 6 2.3. Innate immunity ............................................................................................................ 6 2.4. Aging and longevity ...................................................................................................... 7 2.5. Mesodermal patterning ................................................................................................... 8 2.6. Chemosensation and neuronal function .............................................................................. 8 2.7. Ligand, receptors, and their modulators ............................................................................. 8 2.8. Intracellular -
Caenorhabditis Elegans and Caenorhabditis Briggsae
Mol Gen Genomics (2005) 273: 299–310 DOI 10.1007/s00438-004-1105-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Richard Jovelin Æ Patrick C. Phillips Functional constraint and divergence in the G protein family in Caenorhabditis elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae Received: 2 July 2004 / Accepted: 9 December 2004 / Published online: 27 April 2005 Ó Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract Part of the challenge of the post-genomic Keywords Caenorhabditis elegans Æ Caenorhabditis world is to identify functional elements within the wide briggsae Æ G protein Æ Divergence Æ Gene regulation array of information generated by genome sequencing. Although cross-species comparisons and investigation of rates of sequence divergence are an efficient approach, the relationship between sequence divergence and func- Introduction tional conservation is not clear. Here, we use a com- parative approach to examine questions of evolutionary Recent whole genome sequencing projects have revealed rates and conserved function within the guanine nucle- that a substantial portion of genome evolution consists otide-binding protein (G protein) gene family in nema- of divergence and diversification of gene families (e.g., todes of the genus Caenorhabditis. In particular, we Chervitz et al. 1998; Lander et al. 2001; Venter et al. show that, in cases where the Caenorhabditis elegans 2001; Zdobnov et al. 2002). One of the primary chal- ortholog shows a loss-of-function phenotype, G protein lenges in this emerging field is to use information on genes of C. elegans and Caenorhabditis briggsae diverge sequence similarity and divergence among genomes to on average three times more slowly than G protein genes infer gene function. Very low rates of change might that do not exhibit any phenotype when mutated in C. -
Molecular Evolution Inferences from the C. Elegans Genome* Asher D
Molecular evolution inferences from the C. elegans genome* Asher D. Cutter§, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks St., Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2, Canada Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................1 2. Mutation ................................................................................................................................2 3. Recombination ........................................................................................................................ 3 4. Natural Selection ..................................................................................................................... 4 5. Genetic Drift ...........................................................................................................................6 6. Population dynamics ................................................................................................................ 7 7. Summary ...............................................................................................................................7 8. Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. 8 9. References ..............................................................................................................................8 Abstract An understanding of evolution at the molecular level requires the simultaneous -
The Biology of Strongyloides Spp.* Mark E
The biology of Strongyloides spp.* Mark E. Viney1§ and James B. Lok2 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK 2Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6008, USA Table of Contents 1. Strongyloides is a genus of parasitic nematodes ............................................................................. 1 2. Strongyloides infection of humans ............................................................................................... 2 3. Strongyloides in the wild ...........................................................................................................2 4. Phylogeny, morphology and taxonomy ........................................................................................ 4 5. The life-cycle ..........................................................................................................................6 6. Sex determination and genetics of the life-cycle ............................................................................. 8 7. Controlling the life-cycle ........................................................................................................... 9 8. Maintaining the life-cycle ........................................................................................................ 10 9. The parasitic phase of the life-cycle ........................................................................................... 10 10. Life-cycle plasticity ............................................................................................................. -
Natural Variation and Population Genetics of Caenorhabditis Elegans* §
Natural variation and population genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans* § Antoine Barrière and Marie-Anne Félix , Institut Jacques Monod, CNRS - Universities of Paris, 75251 Paris cedex 05, France Table of Contents 1. Molecular polymorphisms and population genetics ......................................................................... 2 1.1. Low molecular diversity of C. elegans ...............................................................................2 1.2. Population structure and geographic differentiation .............................................................. 7 1.3. Comparison with C. briggsae and C. remanei .....................................................................8 1.4. Outcrossing versus selfing in C. elegans ............................................................................9 2. Phenotypic diversity ............................................................................................................... 11 2.1. Phenotypic change upon mutation accumulation ................................................................ 11 2.2. Polymorphic phenotypes ............................................................................................... 11 2.3. Genetic analysis of a natural phenotypic variation .............................................................. 14 3. References ............................................................................................................................ 16 Abstract C. elegans presents a low level of molecular diversity, which may be explained -
The C. Elegans Eggshell* Kathryn K
The C. elegans eggshell* Kathryn K. Stein1,2 and Andy Golden1,§ 1Laboratory of Biochemistry and Genetics, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA 2Translational Genomics Research Branch, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA Table of Contents 1. Overview of the structure of the C. elegans eggshell ....................................................................... 2 2. Timeline for eggshell formation .................................................................................................. 3 3. Layer one: the vitelline layer ...................................................................................................... 4 4. Layer two: the chitin layer ......................................................................................................... 4 4.1. CHS-1 .........................................................................................................................5 4.2. GNA-2 ........................................................................................................................6 4.3. EGG-1, EGG-2 ............................................................................................................. 6 4.4. EGG-3, EGG-4, EGG-5 .................................................................................................. 6 4.5. SPE-11 ........................................................................................................................7