DOCSLIB.ORG

PHILOSTRATUS' PORTRAIT of HERODES ATTICUS , the Lives Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE KING OF ATHENS: PHILOSTRATUS’ PORTRAIT OF HERODES ATTICUS ESTELLE STRAZDINS HILOSTRATUS’ THIRD-CENTURY-CE TEXT, the Lives of the Sophists, which invents and defines the so-called “Second Sophistic,” privileges Athens Pover any other city in the empire and Herodes Atticus over any other soph- ist. Athens is the center of sophistic activity; Herodes is the city’s most promi- nent citizen, and both the city and the man combine to create and reinforce each other’s significance within this work to the extent that the whole sophistic scene seems to be controlled by Herodes, and Athens itself becomes his domain.1 Re- cently, much scholarly attention has been paid to Herodes, but less to Philo- stratus’ rhetorical presentation of him, since many scholars have long accepted Philostratus as a eulogist or at least an apologist for the great man.2 On a superfi- cial level this picture, particularly Philostratus’ defensive stance toward Herodes, holds true. Yet, I argue, a closer look reveals that the anecdotal biography is in fact a complex mix of praise and blame. Herodes appears as a “larger than life” char- acter, who is ever teetering on the verge of antisocial behavior at the same time as he dominates sophistic society in Athens. The most prominent aspect of Phi- lostratus’ critique involves the refraction of Herodes through a sophistic lens; that is, Philostratus uses the opposing concepts of the tyrant and the king, the ambig- uous figure of the hero, and the revered figure of the philosopher (who appears as a foil to highlight Herodes’ excesses) to meditate on his place as an elite Greek in both Athens and the Roman empire.3 Herodes’ nature is in sharpest relief when juxtaposed to Roman emperors and, in this relationship, Herodes comes to resem- ble Athens’ legendary king, Theseus. I am grateful to Tim Whitmarsh, Jaś Elsner, Jason König, Janet Downie, and CP’s anonymous reviewers, all of whom have provided insightful criticisms of various iterations of this article; all errors remain my own. Re- search for this article was generously funded by an Onassis Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship and an Austra- lian Endeavour Research Fellowship. 1. Anderson 1986, 83; Eshleman 2008, 397–99; 2012, 128–32; Kemezis 2011; Civiletti 2002, 30–31. Kemezis (2014, 212) describes an exiled Aeschines’ foundation of the “movement,” its early flourishing in Asia, and Herodes Atticus’ agency in returning it to Athens to make that city its center. Cf. Bowie 2015, 241–42. As well as personal identity and legacy, I will touch on aspects of cultural identity, whether literary or historical, that have been a focus of “Second Sophistic” studies. Some of the most important of these are: Bowersock 1969; Bowie 1970; Swain 1996; Gleason 1995; Schmitz 1997; Connolly 2001; Whitmarsh 2001 and 2005; König 2014. 2. E.g., Tobin 1997, 7: “Philostratus tries to present the more negative events in Herodes’ life ...in as pos- itive a light as possible ...he could not completely hide unpleasant facts about Herodes’ life. Instead, he tried to defend them or minimize them.” Cf. König 2014, 253; Papalas 1979, 96. See also Kemezis 2014, 209 for Philostratus’ Herodes as “the embodiment of everything a sophist should be.” Cf. Kemezis 2011, 8–11. 3. At VS 481 Philostratus describes his conception of the “Second Sophistic” and the importance of epideixis in character. See Whitmarsh 2001, 42; 2005, 4–5. Classical Philology 114 (2019): 238–264 [q 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved] 0009-837X/19/11402-0004$10.00 238 THE KING OF ATHENS 239 The majority of our evidence for Herodes is monumental, demonstrating his desire to write himself into the landscape on his own terms as prominently and vastly as possible.4 Like many of his contemporaries, he combines monumen- talization with epigraphic activity, but on a grander scale than his sophistic peers.5 A sensitive reading of this material evidence confirms the individuality, ambiguity, and complexity of Philostratus’ rhetorical portrait, but also empha- sizes Philostratus’ influence in shaping Herodes’ memory despite his own best efforts. In this article, I reconsider Philostratus’ Herodes by demonstrating how he uses stock rhetorical figures to characterize the Athenian magnate. Secondly, I show how reading Philostratus alongside elements of Herodes’ material-culture footprint builds a fascinatingly complex picture of one of the most charismatic and repellent figures of second-century Greece. Finally, I suggest reasons for the am- bivalent portrait of Herodes that emerges from this process. By way of introduc- tion, I will consider one episode during which Philostratus constructs the various aspects of Herodes’ character on which I later enlarge. 1. TYRANT,KING,HERO, OR GOD?THE ISTHMUS OF CORINTH ἤλαυνε μὲντὴν ἐπὶ Κορίνθου ὁ Ἡρώδης ξυγκαθημένου του̃ Κτησιδήμου, γενόμενος δὲ κατὰ τὸν Ἰσθμὸν “Πόσειδον,” εἶπεν “βούλομαι μέν, ξυγχωρήσει δὲ οὐ δείς.” θαυμάσας οὖνὁ Κτησίδημος τὸ εἰρημένον ἤρετο αὐ τὸντὴναἰτίαν του̃ λόγου. καὶ ὁ Ἡρώδης “ἐγὼ ,” ἔφη “πολὺνχρόνονἀ γωνίζομαι σημειον̃ ὑ πολείπεσθαι τοιςμετ̃ ’ ἐμὲ ἀ νθρώποις διανοίας δηλούσης ἄνδρα καὶ οὔπω δοκω̃ μοι τη̃ς δόξης ταύτης τυγχάνειν.” ὁ μὲνδὴ Κτησίδημος ἐπαίνους διῄ ει τω̃ντελόγωναὐ του̃ καὶ τω̃ν ἔργων ὡ ςοὐ κ ἐχόντων ὑ περβολὴνἑ τέρῳ , ὁ δὲ Ἡρώδης “φθαρτὰ,” ἔφη “λέγεις ταυ̃τα, καὶ γάρ ἐστι χρόνῳ ἁ λωτά, καὶ τοὺς λόγους ἡ μω̃ν τοιχωρυχου̃σιν ἕτεροι ὁ μὲντὸ μεμφόμενος, ὁ δὲ τό, ἡ δὲ του̃ Ἰσθμου̃ τομὴ ἔργον ἀ θάνατον καὶ ἀ πιστούμενον τῇ φύσει, δοκει̃ γάρ μοι τὸ ῥ η̃ξαι τὸν Ἰσθμὸν Ποσειδω̃νος δεισθαι̃ ἢ ἀ νδρός.” Herodes was driving to Corinth with Ctesidemus sitting by him; on arriving at the Isthmus, Herodes cried: “Poseidon, I want to do it, but no one will let me!” Amazed at what he had said, Ctesidemus asked him the reason for his remark. So Herodes replied: “For a long time I have been striving to leave behind to men that come after me some sign of an intention that reveals me as a man, and I consider that I have not yet achieved this reputation.” Then Ctesidemus narrated praises of his words and deeds which no other man could surpass. But Herodes replied: “All this that you speak of is perishable and liable to conquest by time, and others will plunder my speeches, criticizing now this, now that. But the cutting of the Isthmus is an immortal achievement and unbelievable by nature, for it seems to me that to cleave through the Isthmus requires Poseidon rather than a mere man.”6 (Philostr. VS 552) This passage reveals three important aspects of Philostratus’ Herodes: his am- bition to make a unique mark on the world that is suitable to his self-conception; his fear of mortality and loss of control over his reputation that it ensures; his desire for a heroic kind of immortal fame. Moreover, Herodes’ language iden- 4. On Herodes’ monuments, see Tobin 1997 and Galli 2002. 5. Ameling (1983) and Tobin (1997) contain inscriptional catalogues relating to Herodes. Arafat (1996, 191–92) describes the grand scale of his benefactions. 6. Translations are my own unless otherwise noted. 240 ESTELLE STRAZDINS tifies the metaphorical framework within which we are to locate him: he is striv- ing (ἀ γωνίζομαι) to leave a sign (σημειον̃ ) of a purpose/intention (διανοία) that reveals him as a man (ἀ νήρ); yet, here, ἀ νήρ is perhaps best taken to mean the (great) man that he is.7 The verb ἀ γωνίζομαι signals a contest and, in context, suggests he is striving with himself, future generations, and the past, in that he wants to leave something indelible, remarkable, and unique. Since Homer, σημειον̃ has invoked a funeral monument or tomb marker. Herodes’ σημειον̃ must also be concrete, physical, and not open to misinterpretation, unlike his words, which have brought him contemporary fame but which can be manipu- lated by future audiences, with the implied potential consequence of manipulat- ing his memory. Concurrently, it suggests rivalry with the past, since carving the Isthmus places him in competition with all those who have tried and failed be- fore him.8 The phrase “an immortal task and unbelievable in nature” (ἔργον ἀ θάνατον καὶ ἀ πιστούμενον τῇ φύσει) stresses the “man-made” quality of the hypothetical canal, but also the enormity of the task. So, it is fitting that Herodes’ words and deeds are praised, concepts that, when paired, recall Homer and Thu- cydides, and are features suitable to the “hero” (ἥρως) that Herodes’ name (Ἡρώδης) conjures and that Philostratus plays on throughout his anecdotal bi- ography.9 This notion of altering nature is consistent with the pre-Troy, questing gener- ation of mythic heroes, who performed a civilizing function on the natural world. In particular, the Isthmus is associated with the Athenian hero-king Theseus, who supposedly erected a pillar there delineating the border between the Peloponnese and Ionia (Strabo 3.5.5, 9.1.6–7; Plut. Thes. 25.4). A link to Theseus is not created solely by mythic tradition: Herodes embedded himself in Isthmia by donating chryselephantine statues of Poseidon, Amphitrite, and Melicertes/Palaemon to the temple of Poseidon (Philostr. VS 551; Paus. 2.1.8), which may have been cult statues and may indicate a desire to represent himself monumentally as a “new Theseus.”10 The son of Poseidon, Theseus was believed to have transformed the Isthmian games from funeral games for Melicertes into an event in honor of his father (Plut. Thes. 25.4). Herodes too may have hoped his offerings at the temple would be interpreted as a filial act. Moreover, two more monuments echo Theseus: the arch raised at Marathon celebrating eternal matri- monial harmony between Herodes and his wife Regilla, which intertexts with Theseus’ pillar by delineating the spouses’ respective spaces within Herodes’ es- tate; and the bull on the nymphaeum dedicated by Regilla at Olympia that may recall the Marathonian bull captured and sacrificed by Theseus (Paus.
Recommended publications
  • Hadrian and the Greek East

    Hadrian and the Greek East

    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
  • Teachers' Pay in Ancient Greece

    Teachers' Pay in Ancient Greece

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) University Studies of the University of Nebraska 5-1942 Teachers' Pay In Ancient Greece Clarence A. Forbes Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/univstudiespapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University Studies of the University of Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers from the University Studies series (The University of Nebraska) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Teachers' Pay In Ancient Greece * * * * * CLARENCE A. FORBES UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA STUDIES Ma y 1942 STUDIES IN THE HUMANITIES NO.2 Note to Cataloger UNDER a new plan the volume number as well as the copy number of the University of Nebraska Studies was discontinued and only the numbering of the subseries carried on, distinguished by the month and the year of pu blica tion. Thus the present paper continues the subseries "Studies in the Humanities" begun with "University of Nebraska Studies, Volume 41, Number 2, August 1941." The other subseries of the University of Nebraska Studies, "Studies in Science and Technology," and "Studies in Social Science," are continued according to the above plan. Publications in all three subseries will be supplied to recipients of the "University Studies" series. Corre­ spondence and orders should be addressed to the Uni­ versity Editor, University of Nebraska, Lincoln. University of Nebraska Studies May 1942 TEACHERS' PAY IN ANCIENT GREECE * * * CLARENCE A.
  • The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus

    The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus

    The meditations of Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Originally translated by Meric Casaubon About this edition Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Augustus was Emperor of Rome from 161 to his death, the last of the “Five Good Emperors.” He was nephew, son-in-law, and adoptive son of Antonius Pius. Marcus Aurelius was one of the most important Stoic philosophers, cited by H.P. Blavatsky amongst famous classic sages and writers such as Plato, Eu- ripides, Socrates, Aristophanes, Pindar, Plutarch, Isocrates, Diodorus, Cicero, and Epictetus.1 This edition was originally translated out of the Greek by Meric Casaubon in 1634 as “The Golden Book of Marcus Aurelius,” with an Introduction by W.H.D. Rouse. It was subsequently edited by Ernest Rhys. London: J.M. Dent & Co; New York: E.P. Dutton & Co, 1906; Everyman’s Library. 1 Cf. Blavatsky Collected Writings, (THE ORIGIN OF THE MYSTERIES) XIV p. 257 Marcus Aurelius' Meditations - tr. Casaubon v. 8.16, uploaded to www.philaletheians.co.uk, 14 July 2013 Page 1 of 128 LIVING THE LIFE SERIES MEDITATIONS OF MARCUS AURELIUS Chief English translations of Marcus Aurelius Meric Casaubon, 1634; Jeremy Collier, 1701; James Thomson, 1747; R. Graves, 1792; H. McCormac, 1844; George Long, 1862; G.H. Rendall, 1898; and J. Jackson, 1906. Renan’s “Marc-Aurèle” — in his “History of the Origins of Christianity,” which ap- peared in 1882 — is the most vital and original book to be had relating to the time of Marcus Aurelius. Pater’s “Marius the Epicurean” forms another outside commentary, which is of service in the imaginative attempt to create again the period.2 Contents Introduction 3 THE FIRST BOOK 12 THE SECOND BOOK 19 THE THIRD BOOK 23 THE FOURTH BOOK 29 THE FIFTH BOOK 38 THE SIXTH BOOK 47 THE SEVENTH BOOK 57 THE EIGHTH BOOK 67 THE NINTH BOOK 77 THE TENTH BOOK 86 THE ELEVENTH BOOK 96 THE TWELFTH BOOK 104 Appendix 110 Notes 122 Glossary 123 A parting thought 128 2 [Brought forward from p.
  • Physiognomy in Ancient Science and Medicine

    Physiognomy in Ancient Science and Medicine

    Physiognomy Mariska Leunissen The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Introduction Physiognomy(fromthelaterGreek physiognōmia ,whichisacontractionoftheclassicalform physiognōmonia )referstotheancientscienceofdeterminingsomeone’sinnatecharacteronthe basisoftheiroutward,andhenceobservable,bodilyfeatures.Forinstance,Socrates’famous snubnosewasuniversallyinterpretedbyancientphysiognomistsasaphysiognomicalsignof hisinnatelustfulness,whichheonlyovercamethroughphilosophicaltraining.Thediscipline initstechnicalformwithitsownspecializedpractitionersfirstsurfacesinGreeceinthefifth century BCE ,possiblythroughconnectionswiththeNearEast,wherebodilysignswere takenasindicatorsofsomeone’sfutureratherthanhischaracter.Theshifttocharacter perhapsarisesfromthewidespreadculturalpracticeintheancientGreekandRomanworld oftreatingsomeone’soutwardappearanceasindicativeforhispersonality,whichisalready visibleinHomer(eighthcentury BCE ).Inthe Iliad ,forinstance,adescriptionofThersites’ quarrelsomeandrepulsivecharacterisfollowedbyadescriptionofhisequallyuglybody(see Iliad 2.211–219),suggestingthatthiscorrespondencebetweenbodyandcharacterisno accident.ThersitesisthustheperfectfoilfortheGreekidealofthe kaloskagathos –theman whoisbothbeautifulandgood.Thesameholdsforthepracticeofattributingcharacter traitsassociatedwithaparticularanimalspeciestoapersonbasedonsimilaritiesintheir physique:itisfirstformalizedinphysiognomy,butwasalreadywidelyusedinanon- 1 technicalwayinancientliterature.Themostfamousexampleofthelatterisperhaps SemonidesofAmorgos’satireofwomen(fragment7
  • Platonist Philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria in Amenabar’S Film Agorá

    Platonist Philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria in Amenabar’S Film Agorá

    A STUDY OF THE RECEPTION OF THE LIFE AND DEATH OF THE NEO- PLATONIST PHILOSOPHER HYPATIA OF ALEXANDRIA IN AMENABAR’S FILM AGORÁ GILLIAN van der HEIJDEN Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS In the Faculty of Humanities School of Religion, Philosophy and Classics at the UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL, DURBAN SUPERVISOR: PROFESSOR J.L. HILTON MARCH 2016 DECLARATION I, Gillian van der Heijden, declare that: The research reported in this dissertation, except where otherwise indicated, is my original research; This dissertation has not been submitted for any degree or examination at any other university; This dissertation does not contain other persons’ data, pictures, graphs or other information, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other persons; The dissertation does not contain other persons’ writing, unless specifically acknowledged as being sourced from other researchers. Where other written sources have been quoted, then: a) their words have been re-written but the general information attributed to them has been referenced; b) where their exact words have been used, their writing has been paragraphed and referenced; c) This dissertation/thesis does not contain text, graphics or tables copied and pasted from the Internet, unless specifically acknowledged, and the source being detailed in the dissertation/thesis and in the References sections. Signed: Gillian van der Heijden (Student Number 209541374) Professor J. L. Hilton ii ABSTRACT The film Agorá is better appreciated through a little knowledge of the rise of Christianity and its opposition to Paganism which professed ethical principles inherited from Greek mythology and acknowledged, seasonal rituals and wealth in land and livestock.
  • A Sarc O P Hagu S F Rom T H E Family of Herodes Atticus

    A Sarc O P Hagu S F Rom T H E Family of Herodes Atticus

    HESPERIA 70 (200I) ICONOG RAPHY Pages46z-492 AND THE DYNAMIGS O F PATRO NAG E A SARCO P HAGU S FROM T H E FAMILYOF HERODESATTICUS ABSTRACT A sarcophagusfiom the estateof HerodesAtticus in Kephisiacommemo- ratesthe intimate connections ofthe familywiththe cityof Sparta,the Battle of Marathon,and the cultstatue of Nemesisat Rhamnous.Theiconographic allusionsto Marathonalso reflect the prioritiesof the SecondSophistic, an intellectualmovement that appealed to the pastto establishcultural and po- liticalsuperiority. The unusualand meaningfill decorative program suggests thatthe family commissioned this sarcophagus. The earlierview that the more unusualAttic sarcophagiwere prefabricated, but that theirthemes simply provedunpopular, should be modifiedin lightof this study. INTRODUCTION In Septemberof 1866,during the construction of a housein the Kephisia suburbof Athens,workers discovered a marbleburial chamber, roughly squarein plan.1Robbers had long since plundered the chamber, removing thedeceased and most ofthe portable possessions. In 1866,the significant remainingartifacts included four carved marble sarcophagi and only a handfillof smallobjects.2 Otto Benndorf,who wrotethe firstcomplete descriptionof the chamberand its contents,was also the firstto suggest 1. I thankthe Universityof Mich- andNeel Smithfor discussing with me this study,still stand in the tomb iganfor support that allowed me to someof the ideaspresented here. Photo- today.Cramped space in the tomb undertakepreliminary research in graphswere kindly provided byJan San- makesit difficultto providea complete Athensfor this article;and the College ders;the BritishMuseum; the Deutsches photographicrecord. I thereforerefer of the Holy Crossboth for funds to ArchaologischesInstitut, Rome; the in manyinstances to the line drawings purchasephotographs and for a leaveof GreekArchaeological Service; and the of the Ledasarcophagus produced by absencethat allowed me to continue KunsthistorischesMuseum, Vienna.
  • Livre Antard18.Indb

    Livre Antard18.Indb

    AnTard, 18, 2010, p. 211-224 GREEK RHETORIC AND THE LATER ROMAN EMPIRE. THE BUBBLE OF THE ‘THIRD SOPHISTIC’* LIEVE VAN HOOF Rhétorique grecque et Empire romain tardif. Le mirage de la “Troisième Sophistique” Longtemps négligée, la rhétorique tardo-antique fait maintenant l’objet d’un nombre croissant d’études. Pour mieux marquer cette revalorisation, on a introduit la dénomination de “Troisième Sophistique”. Le présent article entend démontrer que ce syntagme reste problématique : faute de s’accorder sur son signifié précis, les caractéristiques qui lui sont attribuées font l’objet d’une dis- cussion constante. En particulier, le rapport entre la “Troisième Sophistique” et son prédécesseur, la Seconde Sophistique, manque de clarté. Un obstacle majeur qui a empêché de définir ce rapport est la différence d’approche que l’on constate entre les spécialistes de la littérature du Bas Empire et ceux de la littérature du Haut Empire : si la Seconde Sophistique a été longtemps interprétée – comme l’est encore trop souvent la littérature tardo-antique – comme une expression culturelle en déclin ou, du moins, privée de vitalité, les nouvelles approches méthodologiques développées au cours des deux dernières décennies en ont au contraire démontré le dynamisme et l’incidence sociale. Plutôt que de repartir du syntagme “Seconde Sophistique”, on propose une autre vision des choses : appliquées à l’Antiquité tardive, ces mêmes approches méthodologiques nous montrent pour cette époque des sophis- tes qui, loin d’avoir perdu leur prestige social au profit des professeurs de droit, des sténographes, ou des évêques, continuaient à jouer un rôle important dans la vie politique.
  • The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones a Dissertation Submitted in Partial

    The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones a Dissertation Submitted in Partial

    The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2015 Reading Committee: Alain Gowing, Chair Catherine Connors Alexander Hollmann Deborah Kamen Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics ©Copyright 2015 Brandon F. Jones University of Washington Abstract The Sophistic Roman: Education and Status in Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny Brandon F. Jones Chair of Supervisory Commitee: Professor Alain Gowing Department of Classics This study is about the construction of identity and self-promotion of status by means of elite education during the first and second centuries CE, a cultural and historical period termed by many as the Second Sophistic. Though the Second Sophistic has traditionally been treated as a Greek cultural movement, individual Romans also viewed engagement with a past, Greek or otherwise, as a way of displaying education and authority, and, thereby, of promoting status. Readings of the work of Quintilian, Tacitus and Pliny, first- and second-century Latin prose authors, reveal a remarkable engagement with the methodologies and motivations employed by their Greek contemporaries—Dio of Prusa, Plutarch, Lucian and Philostratus, most particularly. The first two chapters of this study illustrate and explain the centrality of Greek in the Roman educational system. The final three chapters focus on Roman displays of that acquired Greek paideia in language, literature and oratory, respectively. As these chapters demonstrate, the social practices of paideia and their deployment were a multi-cultural phenomenon. Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................... 2 Introduction ....................................................................................... 4 Chapter One.
  • The Second Sophistic the Second Sophistic

    The Second Sophistic the Second Sophistic

    THE SECOND SOPHISTIC THE SECOND SOPHISTIC A Cultural Phenomenon in the Roman Empire Graham Anderson London and New York First published 1993 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 © 1993 Graham Anderson All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Anderson, Graham. The second sophistic: a cultural phenomenon in the Roman empire/Graham Anderson p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. Rome–History–Empire, 30 B.B.–284 A.D. 2. Rome–Civilization-Greek influences. 3. Sophists (Greek philosophy) 4. Rhetoric, Ancient. I. Title DG78.A63 1993 937′07–dc20 92–47085 ISBN 0-203-97405-0 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-415-09988-9 (Print Edition) For Ewen Bowie Contents Preface vi List of abbreviations ix INTRODUCTION: ROMAN EMPIRE AND GREEK 1 RENAISSANCE 1 SOPHISTS IN SOCIETY 13 2 PREPARATION,
  • Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES

    Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES

    Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES NUMBER 7 Editorial Board Chair: Donald Mastronarde Editorial Board: Alessandro Barchiesi, Todd Hickey, Emily Mackil, Richard Martin, Robert Morstein-Marx, J. Theodore Peña, Kim Shelton California Classical Studies publishes peer-reviewed long-form scholarship with online open access and print-on-demand availability. The primary aim of the series is to disseminate basic research (editing and analysis of primary materials both textual and physical), data-heavy re- search, and highly specialized research of the kind that is either hard to place with the leading publishers in Classics or extremely expensive for libraries and individuals when produced by a leading academic publisher. In addition to promoting archaeological publications, papyrolog- ical and epigraphic studies, technical textual studies, and the like, the series will also produce selected titles of a more general profile. The startup phase of this project (2013–2017) was supported by a grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Also in the series: Number 1: Leslie Kurke, The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy, 2013 Number 2: Edward Courtney, A Commentary on the Satires of Juvenal, 2013 Number 3: Mark Griffith, Greek Satyr Play: Five Studies, 2015 Number 4: Mirjam Kotwick, Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Text of Aristotle’s Meta- physics, 2016 Number 5: Joey Williams, The Archaeology of Roman Surveillance in the Central Alentejo, Portugal, 2017 Number 6: Donald J. Mastronarde, Preliminary Studies on the Scholia to Euripides, 2017 Early Greek Alchemy, Patronage and Innovation in Late Antiquity Olivier Dufault CALIFORNIA CLASSICAL STUDIES Berkeley, California © 2019 by Olivier Dufault.
  • May 18-30, 2022 (13 Days | 16 Guests) with Archaeologist Gerry Schaus

    May 18-30, 2022 (13 Days | 16 Guests) with Archaeologist Gerry Schaus

    THE LEGACY OF Ancient Greece May 18-30, 2022 (13 days | 16 guests) with archaeologist Gerry Schaus Delphi © Runner1928 Archaeology-focused tours for the curious to the connoisseur xperience the glories of Greece, from the Bronze Age to the Classical era Archaeological Institute of America and beyond, amid the variety of springtime landscapes of the mainland Lecturer & Host and the Peloponnese peninsula. This is a superb opportunity to ignite, Eor reignite, your passion for the wonders of Greek archaeology, art, and ancient Gerald Schaus (PhD, history and to witness how integral mythology, religion, drama, and literature are University of Pennsylvania) is to their understanding. This well-paced tour, from city to mountains to seaside, Professor Emeritus, spends a total of four nights in the modern yet historic capital, Athens; two nights Archaeology and in the charming port town of Nafplion; one night in Dimitsana, a medieval Heritage Studies, mountain village; two nights in Olympia, home of the original Olympic Games; Wilfrid Laurier and two nights in the mountain resort town of Arachova, near Delphi. University (Waterloo, Ontario) and Highlights include: former President of the Canadian • SIX UNESCO World Heritage Sites: Institute in Greece. He is a classical ˚ Athens’ Acropolis, with its stunning Parthenon and Erechtheion archaeologist specializing in ceramics, art, temples, plus the nearby Acropolis Museum; and iconography of the Greek Archaic period. Gerry’s excavation experience ˚ the greatest ancient oracle, Delphi, located in a spectacular over the past 45 years includes sites in mountain setting; Greece (most recently Gournia, Crete), ˚ Olympia, where the Olympic Games were held for 1,000 years, Italy, Libya, and Romania, dating from starting in 776 B.C.; the Neolithic to Byzantine periods.
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Philostratus, Perceptions of Foreign Ethnicity, and Severan Cultural Geography Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7j2862k0 Author Bingley, Christopher Stephen Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Philostratus, Perceptions of Foreign Ethnicity, and Severan Cultural Geography A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Christopher Stephen Bingley 2019 © Copyright by Christopher Stephen Bingley 2019 ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Philostratus, Perceptions of Foreign Ethnicity, And Severan Cultural Geography by Christopher Stephen Bingley Doctor of Philosophy in History University of CaliforniA, Los Angeles, 2019 Professor DAvid DAniel Phillips, Chair During the first two centuries C.E., provinciAl Greek elites reActed to their new stAtus as denizens of the RomAn Empire in part with the literature they produced, often grouped under the heAding of the Second Sophistic. The tAil end of this period, in which a new dynasty of emperors ruled And underwent a crisis of legitimAcy (193-235 C.E.), wAs mArkedly different in the identity of the imperiAl family and as a result the composition of Greek literature. This distinction, however, has not been part of the scholArly approach to the study of this period’s literature, which insteAd focuses on the traits that it shares with eArlier sophistic literature. During this lAter period, the debate over what constituted proper “RomAnness” acquired renewed cultural importAnce especiAlly becAuse of the Severan imperiAl family’s outsider stAtus, SyriAn and AfricAn background, and decree of universAl citizenship in 212 C.E.