DOCSLIB.ORG

Insight and Change: Anagnoresis and Peripeteia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insight and Change: Anagnoresis and Peripeteia Insight and Change: Anagnoresis and Peripeteia By Joel Plotkin This material is made publicly available by the Centre for Playback Theatre and remains the intellectual property of its author. Centre for Playback Theatre www.playbackcentre.org Insight and Change Anagnoresis and Peripeteia This is a much-abbreviated version of an article I wrote in 1995 for the then-new Applied and Interactive Theater Guide, revised to focus on Playback Theater. I had been visiting workshops and conferences of several action methods: drama therapy, psychodrama, theater of the oppressed, and I had been working with a company that used structured improvisation for workplace training. I was excited by the commonalities I found among the different practitioners, and concerned about the lack of interaction among practitioners of the different modalities. I looked for a way to show that these forms were, in fact, theater as I had known, practiced, and defined it since college. I found in the classic by Aristotle, The Poetics, elements and terms that were useful. Free yourself from prejudices about Aristotle, largely engendered by the Renaissance and Neo-classical theorists who used him as a club to punish innovation, but also echoed by Brecht and Boal, who associate him with dreadful and drippy well-made plays. See him simply as an amazingly perceptive communication theorist who, as one of the 15,000 audience members in the Theater of Dionysus, managed to get many things right in trying to understand the power of the most influential communications medium of his time. Here are some of his observations: Tragedy, then, is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each type of artistic ornament, the several kinds being found in several parts of the play; in the form of action, not of narrative; through pity and fear effecting the proper purgation of these emotions Aristotle, The Poetics, Book VI, ll.2-3 (tr. S. H. Butcher) Every Tragedy, therefore, must have six parts, which parts determine its quality: namely, Plot, Character, Diction, Thought, Spectacle, Song. Book VI, l.7 Centre for Playback Theatre www.playbackcentre.org For Tragedy is an imitation, not of men, but of an action and of life, and life consists in action, and its end is a mode of action, not a quality. Book VI, l. 9 the most powerful elements of emotional interest in Tragedy, i.e.,Peripeteia or Reversal of the Situation, and Recognition scenes, are part of the plot. Book VI, l. 13 Here is my effort at rewriting these to account for contemporary action methods: Theater, whether in its several literary genres(1) or its non-scripted, improvisational forms(2), is both an imitation of human interaction(3) and an exemplar(4) of human interaction--between and among characters, performers, audience, and community. Its grammar is language, movement, spectacle, relationship, and emotion, configured through empathy(5) and suspense(6) to both depict and to create a powerful experience(7) of Awareness or Insight(8) , and a subsequent Reversal or Change(9), potentiated by the group mass and its sharings(10). Emotion in theater is transformed from its experiential rawness, distanced and rendered a safer savor(11) of the original, so that audience and performers can balance between complete involvement(12)and aesthetic distance (13), dipping now one way, then the other. (1) Tragedy, comedy, tragico-comical-historical-pastoral, etc. (2) Playback, TO, Improv, psychodrama, etc. (3) On stage (4) i.e., theater is REAL, not a mirror (5) Pity (6) Fear (7) Catharsis (8) Anagnoresis (9) Peripeteia (10) Crowd effect, pheromones, knowledge of current events or context Centre for Playback Theatre www.playbackcentre.org (11) rasa, in Sanskrit (12) Rapture, loss of self, emotional transport (13) Critical awareness, Brechtian alienation, judgment With that as my starting point, I could reconcile my academic training and my fascination with the new forms. The emphasis is on Insight and Change. Catharsis, the arguable point for many theorists throughout history, is the name given to the mental gasp that accompanies insight and change. Freed from having to wonder whether the C- word meant Purgation, Rectification, or Healthy Exercise, I had no difficulty seeing the essence of theater both on stage and in DT or TO workshops. I concluded my article in 1995 by saying that scripted theater was at a point of major paradigm change, devolving into Broadway theme park spectacles and elitist regional theater menus on the one hand, and esoteric and precious experimental performance and conceptual art on the other. The commitment to personal and social change I saw in the new action methods gave me more hope for the future of theater than any other work that I saw. Committed to emotion, safety, creativity, and movement, applied and interactive theater artists were creating a theater that would survive the aggrandizement of drama by the sensory-rich media of film and TV, and would, indeed, surpass anything that virtual reality could offer (In 1995, Howard Rheingold and other futurists were telling us that VR would be a commonplace in 5 years). Why Playback Theater? Perhaps a story will help. In 1997, my mother was dying of uterine cancer. I had moved down to Florida to help be with her for the last few months. For a few weeks, my family spelled me off, and I went to Toronto for a Theater of the Oppressed conference, organized by Mixed Company. The time away was for me a period of healing and recharging among many wonderful people. One of the presentations was by a group of women, many from Washington, DC, doing Playback about women and their issues. During the opening, asked for audience input, I raised my hand first and spoke about my mother and her impending death. I remember the microsecond of hesitation in the leader before she called on me. I imagined her thinking: At a presentation on women, Centre for Playback Theatre www.playbackcentre.org the first one with a hand up, of course, is a man. Raw and hurting from my caregiving, I found the performance cathartic, an hour and a half of insight and change. And I remember thinking that this method, so simple and gentle, was yet one of the most powerful for the receptive audience. And how it built receptivity into its methods. Playback remains, for me, the form I want to work with most and most often, because of its honesty, its humility, and its strength. I feel that we, all of us, need to look at ourselves and our world with that unique sensibility of theater, able to teeter and dip into the realms of both immersive emotional rapture and cool, self-aware detachment. And Playback is a fine way to help audience and performers realize their humanity in all its complexity, diversity, and astonishment..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 12 AP Literature Glossary of Terms Ms. Sutton ALLEGORY Story Or
    12 AP Literature Glossary of Terms Ms. Sutton ALLEGORY story or poem in which characters, settings, and events stand for other people or events or for abstract ideas or qualities. EXAMPLE: Animal Farm; Dante’s Inferno; Lord of the Flies ALLITERATION repetition of the same or similar consonant sounds in words that are close together. EXAMPLE: “When the two youths turned with the flag they saw that much of the regiment had crumbled away, and the dejected remnant was coming slowly back.” –Stephen Crane (Note how regiment and remnant are being used; the regiment is gone, a remnant remains…) ALLUSION reference to someone or something that is known from history, literature, religion, politics, sports, science, or another branch of culture. An indirect reference to something (usually from literature, etc.). AMBIGUITY deliberately suggesting two or more different, and sometimes conflicting, meanings in a work. An event or situation that may be interpreted in more than one way-- this is done on purpose by the author, when it is not done on purpose, it is vagueness, and detracts from the work. ANALOGY Comparison made between two things to show how they are alike ANAPHORA Repetition of a word, phrase, or clause at the beginning of two or more sentences in a row. This is a deliberate form of repetition and helps make the writer’s point more coherent. ANASTROPHE Inversion of the usual, normal, or logical order of the parts of a sentence. Purpose is rhythm or emphasis or euphony. It is a fancy word for inversion. ANECDOTE Brief story, told to illustrate a point or serve as an example of something, often shows character of an individual ANTAGONIST Opponent who struggles against or blocks the hero, or protagonist, in a story.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamartia and Catharsis in Shakespeare's King Lear And
    International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences Submitted: 2016-07-18 ISSN: 2300-2697, Vol. 74, pp 16-25 Revised: 2016-08-01 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.74.16 Accepted: 2016-09-27 CC BY 4.0. Published by SciPress Ltd, Switzerland, 2016 Online: 2016-11-30 Hamartia and Catharsis in Shakespeare’s King Lear and Bahram Beyzaie’s Death of Yazdgerd Mahshid Mirmasoomi M.A of English language and literature, University of Tehran, Iran [email protected] Keywords: hamartia, anti-hero, golden mean, catharsis, King Lear, Death of Yazdgerd Abstract. King Lear (1606) is one of the political tragedies of Shakespeare in which the playwright censures Lear's hamartia wreaking havoc not only upon people's lives but bringing devastation on his own kindred. Shakespeare castigates Lear's wrath, sense of superiority, and misjudgments which lead to catastrophic consequences. In Death of Yazdgerd (1979), an anti-authoritarian play, Bahram Beyzayie, the well-known Persiaian tragedian, also depicts the hamartia of King Yazdgerd III whose pride and unjust treatment of people end in devastation. By demonstrating such defective and reprehensible tragic heroes, both playwrights set at providing audience with an anti-heroic representation of the kings and also shattering the common god-like heroism attributed to hero kings. Bearing in mind the political instability of England after the succession of James I, Shakespeare avails himself of such anti-heroic representation to forewarn those monarchs incapable of maintaining a balance between their judgments and the society's need for a genuine authority. In a similar fashion, Beyzayie narrates the true historical event of a Persian king whose improper exercise of authority, withdrawal from battle, and an ultimate escape leave people helpless against the invasion of Arabs.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Literature in Antiquity Przemysław Paczkowski1
    Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe), 2020, 10 (3–4), 107–115 DOI:10.2478/ebce-2020-0012 The moral power of the word: Ethical literature in Antiquity Przemysław Paczkowski1 Abstract According to an old legend, during the Messenian Wars in Laconia in the 8th and 7th centuries BC, the Athenians sent the poet Tyrtaeus to the Spartans who were close to being defeated; he aroused in them the fighting spirit and renewed Spartan virtues. Philosophers in antiquity believed in the psychagogical power of the word, and this belief provided the foundation for ancient ethical literature, whose main purpose was to call for a spiritual transformation and to convert to philosophy. In this paper, I would like to demonstrate what tradition philosophy referred to in these efforts; what concept of man supported that belief; finally, what literary genres were used by ancient philosophers in ethics. Keywords: Plato, dialogues, ancient rhetoric, literary genres Ancient philosophers believed in the psychagogical power of words, and ethical literature in ancient times was based on this belief. Its goal was to cause spiritual transformation and conversion to philosophy. I shall attempt to show what tradition ancient philosophy referred to in this field; on what concept of human nature this belief was based, and what literary genres were developed in ethics by philosophy. Belief in the power of words ‒ educational, paraenetic, persuasive ‒ accompanied Greek culture from its very beginnings. Poetry (but also music and performances on stage) was attributed with
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Poetics
    Aristotle's Poetics José Angel García Landa Universidad de Zaragoza http://www.garcialanda.net 1. Introduction 2. The origins of literature 3. The nature of poetry 4. Theory of genres 5. Tragedy 6. Other genres 7. The Aristotelian heritage José Angel García Landa, "Aristotle's Poetics" 2 1. Introduction Aristotle (384-322 BC) was a disciple of Plato and the teacher of Alexander the Great. Plato's view of literature is heavily conditioned by the atmosphere of political concern which pervaded Athens at the time. Aristotle belongs to a later age, in which the role of Athens as a secondary minor power seems definitely settled. His view of literature does not answer to any immediate political theory, and consequently his critical approach is more intrinsic. Aristotle's work on the theory of literature is the treatise Peri poietikés, usually called the Poetics (ca. 330 BC). Only part of it has survived, and that in the form of notes for a course, and not as a developed theoretical treatise. Aristotle's theory of literature may be considered to be the answer to Plato's. Of course, he does much more than merely answer. He develops a whole theory of his own which is opposed to Plato's much as their whole philosophical systems are opposed to each other. For Aristotle as for Plato, the theory of literature is only a part of a general theory of reality. This means that an adequate reading of the Poetics 1 must take into account the context of Aristotelian theory which is defined above all by the Metaphysics, the Ethics, the Politics and the Rhetoric.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Providential Apotheosis of His Industry”
    “The Providential Apotheosis of His Industry” Display of Causal Systems in Borges Magdalena Cámpora Universidad Católica Argentina, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) In a 1938 article in which he reviews a mystery novel by J. B. Priestley, Borges states: Para un criterio cotidiano, el azar interviene increíblemente en esta novela. En su decurso hay demasiadas coincidencias “providenciales.” Con igual justicia, un literato puede reprochar a la obra su desanimada (y desanimadora) falta de azar. Abundan las “sorpresas,” pero todas ellas son previsibles, y, lo que es peor, fatales. Para el hombre avezado, o resignado, a este género de ficciones, lo verdaderamente sorprendente sería que no sucediera. (1986, 266) [For a daily criterion, chance intervenes incredibly in this novel. During its course, there are too many “providential” coincidences. With equal justice, a man of letters can reproach the work for its discouraged (and discouraging) lack of chance. “Surprises” are abundant, but all of them are predictable and, CR: The New Centennial Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2011, pp. 125–xxx, issn 1532-687x. © Michigan State University Board of Trustees. All rights reserved. ● 125 126 ● “The Providential Apotheosis of His Industry” what is worst, fatal. For someone who has experience in, or is resigned to, this genre of fictions, what would be truly surprising would be that it did not happen. ]1 Th us, the novel has two flaws: there is too much chance, and this chance is predictable. It is particularly predictable, writes Borges, to someone familiar with the mystery novel, since the reader who is “resigned to this genre of fictions” easily guesses scripts and conventional cause-eff ect chains (patterns such as: “He came back to the crime scene because the murderer always goes back to the crime scene”).
    [Show full text]
  • Tragedy in George Eliot's the Mill on the Floss
    UNIVERSIDADE TECNOLÓGICA FEDERAL DO PARANÁ DEPARTAMENTO ACADÊMICO DE LINGUAGEM E COMUNICAÇÃO DEPARTAMENTO ACADÊMICO DE LÍNGUAS ESTRANGEIRAS MODERNAS CURSO DE LICENCIATURA EM LETRAS PORTUGUÊS/INGLÊS CAROLINA LAURINO ROSSINI "BETWEEN THE INWARD IMPULSE AND THE OUTWARD FACT": TRAGEDY IN GEORGE ELIOT'S THE MILL ON THE FLOSS THESIS CURITIBA 2015 CAROLINA LAURINO ROSSINI "BETWEEN THE INWARD IMPULSE AND THE OUTWARD FACT": TRAGEDY IN GEORGE ELIOT'S THE MILL ON THE FLOSS Thesis presented to the Language Arts English/Portuguese College of Departamento Acadêmico de Língua Estrangeiras Modernas – DALEM – and Departamento Acadêmico de Linguagem e Comunicação – DALIC – of the Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná - UTFPR, as a requirement to obtain the Teaching degree. Advisor: Jaqueline Bohn Donada, Ph.D CURITIBA 2015 Ministério da Educação Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná Campus Curitiba Departamento Acadêmico de Linguagem e Comunicação Departamento Acadêmico de Línguas Estrangeiras Modernas Licenciatura em Letras Português-Inglês TERMO DE APROVAÇÃO "BETWEEN THE INWARD IMPULSE AND THE OUTWARD FACT": TRAGEDY IN GEORGE ELIOT'S THE MILL ON THE FLOSS por CAROLINA LAURINO ROSSINI Este Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (TCC) foi apresentado em 27 de novembro de 2015 como requisito parcial para a obtenção do título de Licenciada em Letras Português-Inglês. A candidata foi arguida pela Banca Examinadora composta pelos professores abaixo assinados. Após deliberação, a Banca Examinadora considerou o trabalho aprovado. __________________________________ Prof.ª Dr.ª Jaqueline Bohn Donada Prof.ª Orientadora ___________________________________ Prof.ª Dr.ª Flavia Azevedo Membro titular ___________________________________ Prof.ª Dr.ª Regina Helena Urias Cabreira Membro titular - O Termo de Aprovação assinado encontra-se na Coordenação do Curso - Dedico este trabalho aos meus pais, que sempre me encorajaram a correr atrás dos meus objetivos.
    [Show full text]
  • Dickens's Oliver Twist and Mendele's the Book of Beggars 299 the Wedding, Did Not Want to Waste the Food
    Dickens's Oliver Twist and Mendele's The Book of Beggars Gershon Shaked 1. Oliver Twist was translated into Russian in 1841, approximately five years after its first publication in England in 1837. The Yiddish and Hebrew transla­ tions were published much later in 1920 and 1924. I imagine that Mendele Moycher Seforim, the pen name of Shalom Jacob Abramowitsch, who was born in 1835 in Kapuli Belorussia and died in 1917 in Odessa, read the Russian translation. The book of his I am discussing was first written in Yiddish under the name of Fishke der Krume (Fishke the Lame) in 1869, , and was translated and rewritten in Hebrew by the author in 1909 as Sefer haKabbezanim (Book of Beggars). A comparative study of these two books seems to me quite illuminating. Oliver Twist is the story of the illegitimate son of a respectable middle-class gentleman, Edward Leeford, who is born in the workhouse and in order to survive joins a group of thieves and pickpockets. His descent into the dae­ monic underworld of Fagin, Sikes, and Monks is basically the result of the morals, manners and norms of his father's society. He is the victim of Victo­ rian sexual and social repression. Only the aid of the good surrogate father, Mr. Brownlow, who finally adopts him, makes his ascent possible. Being poor means losing identity and being given a surrogate identity. The poor are without support and the only way they can sustain themselves is by resigning themselves to their lot or by rebelling against the norms of society.
    [Show full text]
  • Tragedy and Philosophy Around 1800
    Introduction Tragedy and Philosophy around 1800 TraGedy is The mosT PhilosoPhical of art forms. The reasons may be his- torically contingent, but the consequences have been profound. No form of art has inspired as much theoretical reflection, or been as important to the development of philosophy. This interrelation of text and theory, which reaches from Greek antiquity to the present, results largely from the survival of Aristotle’s Poetics. Aristotle, writing in the mid- fourth century BC, gave an account of tragedy’s constitution and effect that has influenced nearly all philosophical understandings of the genre— and of poetry in general— since. Tragedy is the only form to arrive in modernity with a more or less comprehensive theory (despite its fragmentariness and occasional obscu- rity) from so authoritative a source. The Poetics is the origin of the notions that have turned the Greek form τραγῳδία, which flourished in Athens in the fifth century BC, into the modern genre of tragedy, which has efflo- resced in various times and places throughout Western cultures of the last half millennium. The link between ancient Greek and modern tragedy is, in a historical sense, tenuous in the extreme. It is only through an act of will or imagination that we can speak of Sophocles and Shakespeare in the same breath. Yet, though there is no continuous tradition of creation linking fifth century Athens to the present, there is a rich tradition of reading and commentary. This is true for all of “canonical” classical literature, but tragedy is unique in that it has consistently been understood through the lens of a more or less systematic theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aristotelian Legacy in Arthur Miller's Concept of Tragedy
    The Aristotelian Legacy in Arthur Miller’s Concept of Tragedy Sameh S. HASSAN Suez Canal University INTRODUCTION There are whole libraries of books dealing with the nature of tragedy. That the subject is capable of interesting so many writers over the centuries is part proof that the idea of tragedy is constantly changing, and more, that it will never be finally defined. (Miller, ―The Nature of Tragedy,‖ 11) Starting with Arthur Miller's argument about the impossibility of coming up with an appropriate definition of tragedy due to its changing nature, this paper attempts to examine the influence of Aristotle's theory of tragedy, proposed in his Poetics1 in the 4th century BC, on Miller's concept of modern tragedy as given in his theatre essays ―Tragedy and the Common Man‖ (1949), ―The Nature of Tragedy‖ (1949), ―On Social Plays‖ (1955) and ―Introduction to Collected Plays‖ (1958). For many centuries now the Aristotelian theory on tragedy has greatly influenced the creation and critical appreciation of tragedy in western criticism and literature. While writing his theory, Aristotle was influenced by the great classical tragedies of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides from which he managed to point out the common characteristics of a tragedy. Since then, Aristotle's definition of tragedy has been regarded as the standard for taste on which any work that claims to be a tragedy should be evaluated. In this sense, prominent Shakespearean tragedies such as King Lear, Hamlet, Othello and Macbeth that were written during the Renaissance became the subject of numerous critical reviews and studies which were themselves caught in the Aristotelian concept of tragedy as a source of authority and judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy (Pdf)
    Aritotle's definition of tragedy: “Tragedy is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, [...]; with incidents arousing pity and fear, wherewith to accomplish its katharsis of such emotions.” (Aristotle, Poetics, Book V) Tragedy is drama – not narrative; it shows rather than tells. Tragedy deals with the fundamental order of the universe; it creates a cause-and-effect chain that clearly reveals what may happen at any time. Tragedy arouses not only pity but also fear, because the audience can envision themselves within this cause-and-effect chain. The plot must be “a whole,” with a beginning, middle, and end. The beginning must start the cause- and-effect chain, but not be dependent on anything outside the compass of the play. The middle, or climax, must be caused by earlier incidents and itself cause the incidents that follow it. The end, or resolution, must be caused by the preceding events but not lead to other incidents outside the compass of the play. The plot must be “of a certain magnitude,”because the more universal and significant the meaning of the play, the more the playwright can catch and hold the emotions of the audience. Important terms: The main character in a tragedy has a tragic flaw, there is something “wrong with him”, that leads to his tragic end. The tragic flaw is called hamartia. Usually there is also some sort of chaotic element involved in the character's downfall; the chaotic element may be events that can not be controlled by the character – bad luck, bad weather etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgil's Aeneid
    The Ancient Greek Dramatic Arts M. Kubus Drama = “to do” or “to perform” Theatre = “seeing place” The Origins of Drama dithyrambs = hymns sung to Dionysus Traditionally it’s Thespis who began reading as if he were a character, becoming the world’s first actor as we know it (protagonist) Aeschylus adds deuteragonist Sophocles, the triagonist And now we have a play as we understand it The Festival of Dionysus Annual state religious festival that would take place in late March / early April Contest between three playwrights (three tragedies + satyr play) Choral parts were sung Actors were male Actors wore masks CHOROS = “dance in a ring” strophe, antistrophe, epode orchestra (dancing floor) Theatre acoustics Slopes of Mt Parnassus, above the Temple of Apollo at Delphi Tragedy (1) Depicts the downfall of a noble hero or heroine, usually through some combination of (a) hubris (b) fate (c) the will of the gods (2) There’s a tragic hero who has a flaw and makes some sort of mistake (hamartia). (3) The hero need not die, but he must undergo a change in fortune (peripeteia). (4) The tragic hero may achieve some sort of revelation or recognition (anagnorisis) about human fate, destiny, or the will of the gods. Device that carries the tragedy: DRAMATIC IRONY So why is it so alluring? Why are we interested? Catharsis Tragic Playwrights Sophocles Aeschylus Euripides Tragedy and its structure Structure of the play Prologue Parodos – entry of the chorus Episode Stasimon – extended song of the chorus Exodos – final scene of the play drama = to do, to perform tragedy (tragoedia) = goat song (satyrs) arete = excellence hubris = overweening pride; arrogance hamartia = mistake, error in logic acrasia = imbalance, weakness of will peripeteia = reversal of fortune catastrophe = final event or conclusion, misfortune, mishap catharsis = to purge one’s emotions anagnorisis - recognition The Theban Legend .
    [Show full text]
  • Aristotle's Poetics
    The Poetics of Aristotle, by Aristotle http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1974/1974-h/1974-h.htm The Project Gutenberg EBook of Poetics, by Aristotle This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Poetics Author: Aristotle Translator: S. H. Butcher Release Date: November 3, 2008 [EBook #1974] Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK POETICS *** Produced by An Anonymous Volunteer, and David Widger THE POETICS OF ARISTOTLE By Aristotle A Translation By S. H. Butcher [Transcriber's Annotations and Conventions: the translator left intact some Greek words to illustrate a specific point of the original discourse. In this transcription, in order to retain the accuracy of this 1 of 39 1/25/12 10:06 PM The Poetics of Aristotle, by Aristotle http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1974/1974-h/1974-h.htm text, those words are rendered by spelling out each Greek letter individually, such as {alpha beta gamma delta...}. The reader can distinguish these words by the enclosing braces {}. Where multiple words occur together, they are separated by the "/" symbol for clarity. Readers who do not speak or read the Greek language will usually neither gain nor lose understanding by skipping over these passages. Those who understand Greek, however, may gain a deeper insight to the original meaning and distinctions expressed by Aristotle.] Contents Analysis of Contents ARISTOTLE'S POETICS I 'Imitation' the common principle of the Arts of Poetry.
    [Show full text]