DOCSLIB.ORG

TMS.Edu the MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL Published by the MASTER’S SEMINARY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TMS.Edu the MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL Published by the MASTER’S SEMINARY Volume 27, Number 1 Spring 2016 The First Resurrection in Revelation 20 MATT WAYMEYER The Identity of the Little Horn in Daniel 8: Antiochus IV Epiphanes, Rome, or the Antichrist? MARK A. HASSLER A Sin Offering Lying in the Doorway?: A Minority Interpretation of Genesis 4:6–8 CHRIS BURNETT Did Edward Irving Invent the Pre-Trib Rapture View? THOMAS ICE Inerrancy and Church History: Is Inerrancy a Modern Invention? JONATHAN MOORHEAD TMS.edu THE MASTER’S SEMINARY JOURNAL published by THE MASTER’S SEMINARY John MacArthur, President Irvin A. Busenitz, Dean of Faculty Edited for the Faculty: Irvin A. Busenitz John MacArthur Nathan A. Busenitz Richard L. Mayhue Keith H. Essex James Mook F. David Farnell Bryan J. Murphy Michael A. Grisanti Kelly T. Osborne Gregory H. Harris Michael J. Vlach Brad Klassen Mark Zhakevich by Irvin A. Busenitz, Executive Editor Michael J. Vlach, Editor Garry D. Knussman, Editorial Consultant The views represented herein are not necessarily endorsed by The Master’s Seminary, its administration, or its faculty. The Master’s Seminary Journal (MSJ) is is published semiannually each spring and fall. Beginning with the May 2013 issue, MSJ is distributed electronically for free. Requests to MSJ and email address changes should be addressed to [email protected]. Articles, general correspondence, and policy questions should be directed to Dr. Michael J. Vlach. The Master’s Seminary Journal 13248 Roscoe Blvd., Sun Valley, CA 91352 The Master’s Seminary Journal is indexed in Elenchus Bibliographicus Biblicus of Biblica; Christian Periodical Index; and Guide to Social Science & Religion in Periodical Literature. Articles are abstracted in New Testament Abstracts; Old Testament Abstracts; and Religious and Theological Abstracts. This periodical is indexed in the ATLA Religion Database® and it is also included in the full-text ATLASerials® (ATLAS®) collection. Both are products of the American Theological Library Association, 300 S. Wacker Dr., Suite 2100, Chicago, IL 60606, E-mail: [email protected], and www.atla.com. Copyright is waived if photocopied articles are for use in a classroom or local congregation and if the number of copies does not exceed one hundred which are distributed free and include the notice “Copyright (year). Reprinted from The Master’s Seminary Journal.” For any other use, such as posting on the Internet, advance permission is required. ISSN #1066-3959 Volume 27 Spring 2016 Number 1 The Master’s Seminary Journal CONTENTS Editorial ............................................................................................................... 1-2 Irvin A. Busenitz The First Resurrection in Revelation 20 ............................................................. 3-32 Matt Waymeyer The Identity of the Little Horn in Daniel 8: Antiochus IV Epiphanes, Rome, or the Antichrist? ..................................................................................... 33–44 Mark A. Hassler A Sin Offering Lying in the Doorway?: A Minority Interpretation of Genesis 4:6–8 ................................................................................................... 45-55 Chris Burnett Did Edward Irving Invent the Pre-Trib Rapture View? ..................................... 57-73 Thomas Ice Inerrancy and Church History: Is Inerrancy a Modern Invention? .................. 75-90 Jonathan Moorhead Reviews ................................................................................................................. 91-109 Mitchell Bard Death to the Infidels .............................................................................................. 91-95 Reviewed by Gregory H. Harris Victor H. Matthews The Cultural World of the Bible: An Illustrated Guide to Manners and Customs ......................................................................................................... 95-96 Reviewed by Mark A. Hassler Craig Ott, Stephen J. Strauss, and Timothy C. Tennent Encountering Theology of Mission: Biblical Foundations, Historical Developments, and Contemporary Issues ....................................................................................... 96-98 Reviewed by Jonathan Moorhead Sean A. Adams and Seth M. Ehorn Composite Citations in Antiquity .......................................................................... 98-102 Reviewed by Brent Belford Tremper Longman III Job ........................................................................................................................ 102-105 Reviewed by William D. Barrick Alec Motyer Psalms by the Day ............................................................................................... 105-108 Reviewed by William D. Barrick Leen and Kathleen Ritmeyer Jerusalem: The Temple Mount ............................................................................. 108-109 Reviewed by Michael A. Grisanti MSJ 27/1 (Spring 2016) 1–2 EDITORIAL Almost a century ago, Robert Frost penned his now-famous poem, “The Road Less Traveled.” The poem concludes: “Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.” I couldn’t help but think of these well-known lines when The Master’s Semi- nary gathered a few weeks ago to celebrate its 30th anniversary. Board members, fac- ulty, students and guests gathered into a packed family center to commemorate the occasion, to reflect on the first three decades, and to give thanks for God’s abundant blessings. The evening culminated in a farewell address by Dr. Richard Mayhue as he reflected on God’s sovereign greatness in the history of TMS. For more than a quarter century, he gave leadership to the seminary, orchestrating its growth to over 400 students and 1,600 graduates who are ministering in 45 countries on six conti- nents. Like the traveler in Robert Frost’s poem, the seminary was born in the midst of an onslaught of divergent influences. It stood at a crossroads. Pragmatism was rapidly infiltrating the world of seminary education. In an attempt to produce a contemporary pastoral model that would make churches grow quickly, seminaries were being lured down the path of expediency without fully assessing the deadly consequences of abandoning the timeless, scriptural prescriptions for the church. With the NT blueprint for the church being rapidly replaced by models that had far more to do with marketing, demographics, and sociological influences than with God’s truth in Scripture, the time was right for a new seminary to be born—a semi- nary committed to developing its curriculum around a biblically defensible theology of ministry. As noted nineteenth-century seminary professor Benjamin Warfield ex- pressed: “A low view of the functions of ministry will naturally carry with it a low conception of the training necessary for it. And a high view of the functions of ministry on evangelical lines inevitably produces a high conception of the training which is needed to prepare men for the exercise of these high functions.”1 Choosing the road less traveled, TMS resolved to maintain a high view of the ministry and, in doing so, bound itself to three commitments. First, the seminary committed to provide an environment that fosters the building of godly character in the lives of the men. Understanding that Scripture clearly marks godly character as the cornerstone of every truly lasting ministry, the seminary led a renewed commit- ment to this biblical prerequisite by, among other things, incorporating discipleship 1 Benjamin B. Warfield, “Our Seminary Curriculum: What Ought It to Be?” The Bible Student and Teacher XI, no. 1 (July to December, 1909): 182. 1 2 | Editorial groups into its curriculum. The administration, faculty, and staff were convinced that godly church leaders respond best to the sanctifying work of God’s Spirit, who em- powers the treasures of the Word, ignites the fires of spiritual passion, sharpens the eye of visionary leadership, and strengthens the hand of service. It all begins with godly character. Ministry cannot do without it. Second, the seminary committed itself to expanding the depth and breadth of biblical knowledge in each student. Carl Henry has observed, “No Christian move- ment can impact society if its leaders are ignorant of or continually undermining the veracity and applicability of its charter documents.”2 Without a facility in the original languages, one is left to interpret the Bible subjectively, never certain of the accuracy of one’s own conclusions or the reliability of a commentator’s assertions. Without a linguistic facility in biblical Greek and Hebrew and a theological framework forged in the fires of exegesis and hammered out on the anvil of faithful study, the next generation of seminary trained pastors would be unable to provide their congrega- tions with a secure anchor to weather “every wind of doctrine.” Third, the seminary committed itself to developing and enhancing the ministry skills of each student. The dictionary notes that “seminary” is derived from “semi- nal,” which means “seed-plot.” Understanding that the seminary is a garden, a pro- tected place where plants are watered, tended, nurtured, and sometimes pruned, TMS put down its roots in the center of everyday ministry. Knowing that ministry prepa- ration is “caught” as well as “taught,” the seminary committed itself to teaching min- istry skills in an environment of ministry. Like going to medical school at a hospital, the vibrancy of Grace Community Church provided an ideal location for maximizing the honing of ministry skills. Even the accrediting
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Complete Issue
    THE JOURNAL of the UNITED REFORMED CHURCH HISTORY SOCIETY incorporating the Congregational Historical Society, founded in 1899, and the Presbyterian Historical Society of England, founded in 1913) EDITORS: Revd. Dr. R. BUICK KNOX and Dr. CLYDE BINFIELD, M.A. Volume 3, No.5 March 1985 CONTENTS Editorial 0 0 •••••••••••• 0 •••••• 0 ••••••• 0 •• 0 ••••••••• 159 Newman and Prophecy, Evangelical and Catholic by Sheridan W. Gilley B.A., Ph.D., F.R.Hist.S. 160 Reviews by Stephen Mayor . ..................... : . 188 Our Contemporaries 190 EDITORIAL For reasons which will become pleasantly apparent with the next issue, 1985 will see three issues of the Journal. The present issue is devoted to the society's annual lecture which was delivered during the study weekend held at Kirkley Hall, Ponteland, in September 1984. Dr. Sheridan Gilley, Senior Lecturer in the Department of Theology at the University of Durham, has placed the society firmly in his debt both by his readiness to lecture at unavoidably short notice and by the theme of his paper. At first sight "Newman and Prophecy", whether Evangelical or Catho­ lic, is unlikely to be of immediate relevance to our concerns. The past year, however, has seen the hundred and fiftieth anniversary of Edward Irving's death, and Dr. Gilley's paper, by reminding us that prophecy was a major concern of mainstream Protestantism until well into the nineteenth century, provides a context for our understanding of what otherwise is an embarrass- . ingly eccentric (and therefore ignored) aspect of our past. Other aspects of this will be explored in the Journal's October issue by Professor Roger H.
    [Show full text]
  • The Walvoord Legacy
    Scholars Crossing Article Archives Pre-Trib Research Center May 2009 The Walvoord Legacy Thomas D. Ice Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch Recommended Citation Ice, Thomas D., "The Walvoord Legacy" (2009). Article Archives. 88. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/pretrib_arch/88 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Pre-Trib Research Center at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Article Archives by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE WALVOORD LEGACY by Thomas Ice The comprehensive sweep of the Bible, as it looks at history from God’s point of view and then presents the glorious future that is awaiting the child of God, gives the Christian a life of meaningful activity, a system of values that transcends the materialism of our day, and a glorious hope in a world where there is much happiness.1 —John F. Walvoord On December 20, 2002 one of the giants of the church went home to be with the Lord. John F. Walvoord, theologian, writer, and teacher, seminary president, and defender of dispensational pretribulational premillennialism passed from our midst. He was 92 years old. It would not be an overstatement to say that Dr. Walvoord was the foremost proponent of pretribulationism and one of the world’s leading interpreters of Bible prophecy. We will miss him! However, as giants are prone to do, he has left behind a great legacy. Dr. Walvoord came to Dallas Seminary in 1931 as a student and remained there until his death in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glory of God and Dispensationalism: Revisiting the Sine Qua Non of Dispensationalism
    The Journal of Ministry & Theology 26 The Glory of God and Dispensationalism: Revisiting the Sine Qua Non of Dispensationalism Douglas Brown n 1965 Charles Ryrie published Dispensationalism Today. In this influential volume, Ryrie attempted to explain, I systematize, and defend the dispensational approach to the Scriptures. His most notable contribution was arguably the three sine qua non of dispensationalism. First, a dispensationalist consistently keeps Israel and the church distinct. Second, a dispensationalist consistently employs a literal system of hermeneutics (i.e., what Ryrie calls “normal” or “plain” interpretation). Third, a dispensationalist believes that the underlying purpose of the world is the glory of God.2 The acceptance of Ryrie’s sine qua non of dispensationalism has varied within dispensational circles. In general, traditional dispensationalists have accepted the sine qua non and used them as a starting point to explain the essence of dispensationalism.3 In contrast, progressive dispensationalists have largely rejected Ryrie’s proposal and have explored new ways to explain the essential tenants of Douglas Brown, Ph.D., is Academic Dean and Senior Professor of New Testament at Faith Baptist Theological Seminary in Ankeny, Iowa. Douglas can be reached at [email protected]. 2 C. C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today (Chicago: Moody, 1965), 43- 47. 3 See, for example, R. Showers, There Really Is a Difference, 12th ed. (Bellmawr, NJ: Friends of Israel Gospel Ministry, 2010), 52, 53; R. McCune, A Systematic Theology of Biblical Christianity, vol. 1 (Allen Park, MI: Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary, 2009), 112-15; C. Cone, ed., Dispensationalism Tomorrow and Beyond: A Theological Collection in Honor of Charles C.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Registered Political Party Or Independent Total
    Final Results 2016 GLA ELECTIONS ELECTION OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY MEMBERS Declaration of Results of Poll I hereby give notice as Greater London Returning Officer at the election of the London Wide Assembly Members held on 5th May 2016 that the number of votes recorded at the election is as follows: - Name of Registered Political Party or Independent Total Votes Animal Welfare Party 25810 Britain First - Putting British people first 39071 British National Party 15833 Caroline Pidgeon's London Liberal Democrats 165580 Christian Peoples Alliance 27172 Conservative Party 764230 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 207959 Labour Party 1054801 Respect (George Galloway) 41324 The House Party - Homes for Londoners 11055 UK Independence Party (UKIP) 171069 Women's Equality Party 91772 Total number of good votes 2615676 The number of ballot papers rejected was as follows:- (a) Unmarked 18842 (b) Uncertain 1127 (c) Voting for too many 9613 (d) Writing identifying voter 145 (e) Want of official mark 6 Total 29733 And I do hereby declare that on the basis of the total number of London votes cast for each party and number of constituency seats they have gained, the eleven London Member seats have been allocated and filled as follows. Seat Number Name of Registered Political Party or Independent 1 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 2 UK Independence Party (UKIP) 3 Caroline Pidgeon's London Liberal Democrats 4 Conservative Party 5 Conservative Party 6 Labour Party 7 Green Party - "vote Green on orange" 8 Labour Party 9 Conservative Party 10 Labour Party
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronology of Revelation 19—20
    Session #5 The Chronology of Revelation 19—20 The Expositors Seminary Super Seminar—April 8–9, 2016 I. Introduction § Key Question: Do the events of Rev 20:1–6 follow the events of Rev 19:11–21? OR Does Rev 20 take the reader back to the beginning of the NT era so that verses 1–6 describe the present age? Comparison of Views Ø The Sequential View of Premillennialism The Millennium of Rev 20 ____________ the Second Coming of Rev 19 Ø The Recapitulation View of Amillennialism The Millennium of Rev 20 ____________ the Second Coming of Rev 19 II. The Sequential View of Premillennialism A. The Introductory “And I Saw” (Rev 20:1) § Used _______ in Book of Revelation § Almost always introduces _______________ ________________ § Argument is _______________ but places burden of proof on amillennial view B. The Content of the Visions (Rev 20:1–6) § The binding of Satan is ____________ (not present) § The first resurrection is ____________ (not spiritual) § The thousand years is ____________ (not symbolic) Ø Therefore: The chronology of Rev 19-20 must be ________________! 19 C. The Use of “Any Longer” (Rev 20:3) § Rev 12–19 repeatedly highlights the satanic deception of the nations in the second half of the Tribulation (12:9; 13:14; 16:14; 18:23; 19:19–20). § Satan is then locked in the abyss “so that he would not deceive the nations any longer” (Rev 20:3), which indicates the interruption of a deception that was already taking place. § This connection indicates a historical progression in which the binding of Rev 20 is designed to halt the deception described in Rev 12–19.
    [Show full text]
  • Inerrancy and Church History: Is Inerrancy a Modern Invention?
    MSJ 27/1 (Spring 2016) 75–90 INERRANCY AND CHURCH HISTORY: IS INERRANCY A MODERN INVENTION? Jonathan Moorhead Instructor, The Master’s Academy International, Czech Republic The claim that the church has always believed in the inerrancy of Scripture has been challenged for over a century. In particular, it has been charged that the doc- trine of inerrancy was invented by Princetonian theologians and proto-fundamental- ists. This article will show from primary resources that this claim is without warrant. ***** In 1970, Ernest Sandeen (Macalester College) claimed that nineteenth-century Princeton theologians A. A. Hodge and B. B. Warfield created the doctrine of iner- rancy to combat the burgeoning threat of liberalism.1 In particular, Sandeen posited that the doctrine of inerrancy in the original autographs “did not exist in either Europe or America prior to its formulation in the last half of the nineteenth century.”2 In 1979, Jack Rogers (Fuller Seminary) and Donald McKim (Dubuque Theological Seminary) wrote, The Authority and Interpretation of the Bible: An Historical Ap- proach, which popularized this theory on a broad scale. Over the past forty years, the conclusions of Sandeen, Rogers and McKim have affected how many Christians think about the doctrine of inerrancy. Namely, if the doctrine of inerrancy was not promoted throughout church history, why should the church fight for it now? 1 Ernest Sandeen, The Roots of Fundamentalism: British and American Millenarianism 1800– 1930 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970). Sandeen did not originate this charge. As early as 1893 Philip Schaff claimed, “the theory of a literal inspiration and inerrancy was not held by the Re- formers” (quoted by B.B.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Examination of the Millennium in Rev 20:1–6: Consummation and Recapitulation
    JETS 44/2 (June 2001) 237–51 A RE-EXAMINATION OF THE MILLENNIUM IN REV 20:1–6: CONSUMMATION AND RECAPITULATION dave mathewson* i. introduction The question of the so-called millennial kingdom in Rev 20:1–6 continues to be a source of fascination in evangelical discussion and dialogue.1 The purpose of this article is to re-examine the question of the millennial king- dom as articulated in Rev 20:1–6. More specifically, this article will consider the meaning and function of 20:1–6 within Revelation as it relates to the contemporary debate about whether this section is best understood within a premillennial or amillennial framework. Hermeneutically, most of the de- bate has centered around how literally the reference to the one thousand years in 20:1–6 should be taken and, more importantly, the relationship be- tween 20:1–6 and 19:11–21. Does the thousand year period in 20:1–6 re- fer to a more or less literal period of time?2 Or should it be understood more symbolically? Does 20:1–6 follow 19:11–21 chronologically, with the one thou- sand years featuring a Zwischenreich (premillennialism), or does the final battle in 20:7–10 recapitulate the battle in 19:11–21, with the reference to the one thousand years in 20:1–6 extending all the way back to the first coming of Christ (amillennialism)?3 * Dave Mathewson is instructor in New Testament at Oak Hills Christian College, 1600 Oak Hills Road SW, Bemidji, MN 56601. 1 Cf. R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inerrancy of Scripture, Kevin Vanhoozer
    The Inerrancy of Scripture: By Kevin Vanhoozer, Senior Lecturer in Theology and Religious Studies at New College, University of Edinburgh – Republished with permission from Latimer House 131 Banbury Road Oxford OX2 7AJ Whereas inspiration concerns the origin of the bible's authority, inerrancy describes its nature. By inerrancy we refer not only to the Bible's being 'without error' but also to its inability to err (we might helpfully illustrate this point by comparing it to the distinction between Jesus' sinlessness or being without sin, on the one hand, and his impeccability or inability to sin on the other). Inerrancy, positively defined, refers to a central and crucial property of the Bible, namely, its utter truthfulness. The basis for the doctrine of biblical inerrancy is located both in the nature of God and in the Bible's teaching about itself. First, if God is perfect – all knowing, all wise, all-good – it follows that God speaks the truth. God does not tell lies; God is not ignorant. God's Word is thus free from all error arising either from conscious deceit or unconscious ignorance. Such is the unanimous confession of the Psalmist, the prophets, the Lord Jesus and the apostles. Second, the Bible presents itself as the Word of God written. Thus, in addition to its humanity (which is never denied), the Bible also enjoys the privileges and prerogatives of its status as God's Word. God's Word is thus wholly reliable, a trustworthy guide to reality, a light unto our path. If the biblical and theological basis of the doctrine is so obvious, however, why have some in our day suggested that the inerrancy of the Bible is a relatively recent concept? It is true, as some have suggested that the inerrancy of the Bible is a relatively recent concept? Is it true, as some have argued, that the doctrine of inerrancy was 'invented' in the nineteenth century at Princeton by B B Warfield and Charles Hodge and is therefore a novelty in the history of theology? In answer to this question, it is important to remember that doctrines arise only when there is a need for them.
    [Show full text]
  • Covenant Theology
    ST 601/01 Syllabus Spring 2019 Reformed Theological Seminary Covenant Theology Meeting Information Meeting Time: Thursdays, 6:00 PM–8:00 PM (February 7 – May 9) Meeting Place: WSC Contact Information Prof.: D. Blair Smith (office: lower level in E building) Office Phone: 704-366-5066 (x4223) Email: [email protected] Hours: Mondays 3:00 PM–5:00 PM and by appointment Teacher Assistant: Nate Groelsema ([email protected]) Course Description This course will systematically present biblical teaching on covenant theology as understood and taught within the Reformed tradition, demonstrating that these formulations (1) represent the proper understanding of Scripture, (2) inherit and carry forward the best of the ancient teachings of the Church, and (3) provide the people of God the doctrine needed in order to thrive as disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ in the twenty-first century. Course Objectives 1. To see how a robust theology of the covenant emerges from God’s full revelation in Scripture. 2. To examine the role of covenant in God’s redemptive purposes, giving attention to both the interrelationship and the development of the various covenants found in Scripture. 3. To enable the student to better grasp issues that have arisen in covenantal thought and the centrality of covenant theology in some areas of contemporary debate. 4. To consider the influence of God’s covenant and of covenant theology on the life of the Church today, placing particular emphasis on how covenant theology is a rich resource for preaching, teaching, and counseling God’s people. Texts and Abbreviations Summary (required) CMS: Jonty Rhodes, Covenants Made Simple: Understanding God’s Unfolding Promises to His People ECGM: Herman Witsius, The Economy of the Covenants Between God and Man (2 vols.
    [Show full text]
  • L'activisme Animaliste Et Ses Répercussions Sur La Politique Belge
    Université Libre de Bruxelles Institut de Gestion de l’Environnement et d’Aménagement du Territoire Faculté des Sciences Master en Sciences et Gestion de l'Environnement L’activisme animaliste et ses répercussions sur la politique belge Mémoire de Fin d'Etudes présenté par THIBAUT, LISA en vue de l'obtention du grade académique de Master en Sciences et Gestion de l'Environnement Finalité Gestion de l’Environnement Année Académique : 2018-2019 Directeur : Prof. Edwin Zaccai Mes remerciements les plus profonds aux douze activistes et militants politiques qui m’ont accordé leur confiance et ont pris le temps de répondre à mes questions. Grâce à eux, j’ai pu mieux comprendre la lutte antispéciste et ce qu’elle signifiait au quotidien pour chacun d’entre eux. Merci tout particulièrement à mon directeur de mémoire, le professeur Edwin Zaccai, pour son aide précieuse, ses corrections et ses conseils avisés. Merci à William Thibaut, Myriam Chapuis et Corneliu Gaina pour leur soutien sans faille. Merci à Julie Pondant, Violaine Jouan, Quentin Aubert, Viviane Thibaut et Géraldine Papegnies pour leurs conseils et leur relecture. Résumé La problématique du mémoire s’articule autour du cas de l’animalisme en Belgique, et plus particulièrement de la branche de la lutte antispéciste, et de ses retombées dans le monde politique. Quel pouvoir politique peuvent avoir concrètement ces mouvements sur les animaux ? Pour répondre à cette question, un état des lieux concernant les droits des animaux a été réalisé dans plusieurs parties du monde, avec un focus particulier sur l’historique et la situation actuelle de l’Union Européenne.
    [Show full text]
  • THEONOMY and ESCHATOLOGY | Some Reflections on Postmillennialism
    THEONOMY AND ESCHATOLOGY | Some Reflections On Postmillennialism By Richard B. Gaffin, Jr.1 Essential to the emergence of theonomy/(Christian) reconstructionism has been a revival of postmillennialism.2 Among current postmils, to be sure, there are some who are not recon- structionists, but all reconstructionists—whatever their differences—consider themselves post- mils. Or so it would have seemed until just recently with the unanticipated and apparently grow- ing impact of reconstructionist viewpoints in circles whose eschatology is characteristically premil. Still, for reconstructionism’s leading advocates, postmillennialism is plainly integral— whether logically or psychologically—to their position as a whole. Nonreconstructionist postmils would naturally deny any such connection. This chapter provides some partial, personally-tinged, yet, I hope, not entirely unhelpful reflections on the resurgent postmillennialism of the past 20-25 years. My reservations lie in at least four areas. DEFINING POSTMILLENNIALISM A large element of ambiguity cuts across much of today’s postmillennialism. Before trying to specify that ambiguity it will be helpful, historically, to give some attention to the fact that in the past, too, postmillennialism has not been the clearly defined, unambiguous position that some of its contemporary proponents make it out to be. It is fairly common to point out the inadequacy of our conventional designations pre, post, and a. But, no less commonly, in ensuing discussion that recognition recedes. As a result, efforts, for one, to distinguish between the postmil and amil positions get confused—usually, as it turns out, more than a merely terminological confusion. Who coined the term amillennial and when did it first begin to be used? Perhaps I’ve missed it somewhere, but the usual sources don’t seem to know or at least don’t say.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bible Vision
    Taylor University Pillars at Taylor University TUFW Alumni Publications Publications for TUFW and Predecessors 10-1-1936 The iB ble Vision Fort Wayne Bible Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://pillars.taylor.edu/tufw-alumni-publications Part of the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Fort Wayne Bible Institute, "The iB ble Vision" (1936). TUFW Alumni Publications. 225. https://pillars.taylor.edu/tufw-alumni-publications/225 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications for TUFW and Predecessors at Pillars at Taylor University. It has been accepted for inclusion in TUFW Alumni Publications by an authorized administrator of Pillars at Taylor University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 'WHERE THERE IS NO VISION, THE PEOPLE PERISH' THE BIBLE VISION '*Write the znsion and make it plain" THE HEAVENLY VISION Rev. J. E. Ramseyer THE THEOLOGY OF THE HYMNBOOK Dr. John Greenfield THE CROSS ANTICIPATED Mr. John Tuckey THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS Rev. B. F. Leightner WHAT'S NEW AT THE BIBLE INSTITUTE WITH THE ALUMNI OCTOBER, 1936 Publication of the Fort Wayne Bible Institute Fort Wayne, Indiana 1 The Bible Vision Published monthly by THE FORT WAYNE BIBLE INSTITUTE S. A. WITMER, Editor B. F. LEIGHTNER, Associate Editor LOYAL RINGENBERG, Associate Editor HARVEY MITCHELL, Editor of Fellowship Circle Department Publisher Economy Printing Concehn, Berne, Indiana Yearly Subscription, Seventy- Five Cents; Sixteen Months for One Dollar; Three Years for Two Dollars; Single Copy for Ten Cents. Address all correspondence regarding subscriptions or subject-matter to the Fort Wayne Bible Institute, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
    [Show full text]