DOCSLIB.ORG

Core 1..168 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Core 1..168 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25) House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 217 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, May 26, 2015 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 14135 HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, May 26, 2015 The House met at 10 a.m. very serious issue and that the protection of Canadians' personal information is a key component of a strong digital economy. In general we agree with the recommendations and the report. Prayers However, we believe that the recommendations fail to cover some issues, including the following: requiring government and Internet ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS service providers to produce transparency reports whenever personal information is voluntarily shared; a targeted strategy for first nations; Ï (1000) updating the Privacy Act; ways to verify IDs; the requirement for [English] credit freezes to be offered to consumers; guidelines surrounding the use of social insurance numbers by private organizations; and order- GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS making power for the Privacy Commissioner. Mr. Tom Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, CPC): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both The NDP's supplementary recommendations would put an end to official languages, the government's response to 14 petitions. the growing problem of identity theft and would provide better protection for Canadians' personal information in the digital era. *** COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE *** INTERNATIONAL TRADE Mr. Randy Hoback (Prince Albert, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I have COMPETITION PROSECUTION SERVICE ACT the honour to present, in both official languages, the fourth report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, in relation to the Ms. Annick Papillon (Québec, NDP) moved for leave to main estimates 2015-16. introduce Bill C-681, An Act to amend the Competition Act [Translation] (Competition Prosecution Service). ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PRIVACY AND ETHICS Mr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault (Sherbrooke, NDP): Mr. Speaker, I She said: Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to introduce my new bill on have the honour to present, in both official languages, the seventh creating a competition prosecution service, which will allow the report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy Competition Bureau to act more quickly when an offence requires and Ethics, entitled “The Growing Problem of Identity Theft and Its criminal prosecution. Economic and Social Impact”. [English] The bill gives the new director the authority to initiate and I also present the eighth report of the the Standing Committee on conduct, on behalf of the Attorney General of Canada, prosecutions Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, entitled “Main Estimates under any act for the enforcement of which the Commissioner of 2015-16: Vote 1 under Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying, Competition is responsible. Former competition commissioner Vote 1 under Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Melanie Aitken recommended implementing such a measure in Commissioner, Votes 1 and 5 under Office of the Information and order to expedite legal action against offenders. Privacy Commissioners of Canada and Vote 1 under Senate Ethics Officer”. Unfortunately, bid rigging and price fixing remain common [Translation] crimes in Canada, and Canadians expect the offenders to be Ms. Charmaine Borg (Terrebonne—Blainville, NDP): Mr. punished quickly. My bill will help accelerate the legal process, Speaker, I am pleased to rise to present the NDP's supplementary thereby increasing protection for consumers. I certainly hope to have report on the identity theft study. We agree that identity theft is a the government's support on this matter. 14136 COMMONS DEBATES May 26, 2015 Routine Proceedings (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed) As members know, there have been many human-trafficking cases around the Windsor area, and the majority of these petitions come *** from the Windsor area. Ï (1005) HOUSING [English] Mr. Kennedy Stewart (Burnaby—Douglas, NDP): Mr. Speaker, PETITIONS I have three petitions. TOBACCO PRODUCTS The first two are petitions signed by the residents of the Post 83 Mr. Mike Wallace (Burlington, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I am Co-operative Housing Association and the 115 Place Co-op, both of particularly happy to present two petitions, as the petitioners are which are located in my riding of Burnaby—Douglas. Over the past youth in my riding. decade, housing prices in metro Vancouver have skyrocketed and too The first petition is for the removal of all flavours of all tobacco many families are struggling to keep a roof over their heads. The products. petitioners call on the Government of Canada to immediately renew funding for long-term operating agreements with social housing AGRICULTURE providers, and I strongly urge the government to consider this petition. Mr. Mike Wallace (Burlington, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the other petition is to adopt international aid policies to support small family IMPAIRED DRIVING farms, especially women farmers, and recognize their vital role in the struggle against hunger and poverty, and to ensure that Canadian Mr. Kennedy Stewart (Burnaby—Douglas, NDP): Mr. Speaker, policies and programs are developed in consultation with small my third petition is presented on behalf of my constituent George family farms to protect the right of small family farms in the global Sojka. In 2005, George's sister, Helen Sonja Francis, was killed by south to preserve and use friendly exchanged seeds. an impaired driver. Due to unforeseen circumstances, the RCMP [Translation] officers were unable to forward a warrant to the justice of the peace for approval within the four-hour time limit as legislated. As a result, Mr. Mathieu Ravignat (Pontiac, NDP): Mr. Speaker, it is my the samples of the impaired driver's blood were ruled inadmissible. honour to present a petition calling on the Government of Canada to adopt international aid policies that support small farmers, especially women, in order to recognize their vital role in the struggle against The petitioner calls on this House to amend the Criminal Code of hunger and poverty. The petition also calls on the government to Canada to change the current four-hour time limit for warrant ensure that Canadian policies and programs are developed in approval to a six-hour time limit. consultation with small farmers. [Translation] [English] TAXATION AIR TRANSPORTATION Mr. Adam Vaughan (Trinity—Spadina, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I Ms. Isabelle Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, NDP): rise today to present a petition on behalf of the residents of the Mr. Speaker, I have two petitions to present this morning. Toronto waterfront, who are asking the federal government not to reopen the tripartite agreement that governs the island airport, in The first is signed by hundreds of people across Canada who are large part because of a proposal for jets on the waterfront, which calling on the government to eliminate the tax on feminine hygiene many Torontonians find objectionable and at odds with the billions products. An opposition motion has already been supported by all of of dollars of investment that the federal, provincial, and city the parties, and the petitioners really want the government to governments have made to beautify the waterfront. implement the motion it supported. The NDP and the petitioners believe that this tax is sexist and that it should be eliminated. The petitioners ask that the federal government reject the request from Porter Airlines to reopen the tripartite agreement to allow for Ï (1010) jets, and for all members of this House to respect the residents of the waterfront and whenever possible refrain from flying Porter Airlines CANADA POST and making a situation, which is bad, much worse in terms of air pollution. Ms. Isabelle Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, NDP): Mr. Speaker, I have a second petition signed by people in my riding INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS who want the government to stop making cuts to postal services. The Mrs. Joy Smith (Kildonan—St. Paul, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I am government is continuing to reduce our postal services and is cutting presenting petitions today from parents all across Ontario. The home delivery. Many seniors and single women are concerned about petitioners request that Parliament require Internet service providers this. More and more cities are asking the government not to go to provide a mandatory opt-in Internet pornography filter as a tool forward with these cuts. All of these people would like the parents can use to protect their children from Internet pornography. government to listen to them. May 26, 2015 COMMONS DEBATES 14137 Speaker's Ruling TAXATION Q-1129, which was tabled in the House on May 8, 2015. I would like Ms. Francine Raynault (Joliette, NDP): Mr. Speaker, today, I to thank the hon. member for having raised this matter, as well as the am pleased to present a petition to eliminate the GST on feminine hon. Leader of the Government in the House of Commons and the hygiene products. As I already said, I have three daughters and they House Leader of the Official Opposition for their comments. have seven daughters. Let us just say that that costs parents a lot of money. It is fair and reasonable to eliminate the tax on these products [English] because women have no choice but to use them. Ms. Christine Moore (Abitibi—Témiscamingue, NDP): Mr. Speaker, today, I am pleased to present a petition to eliminate the In raising this matter, the member for Timmins—James Bay federal tax on feminine hygiene products. Back in the days when our explained that the response he received to his written question, grandmothers used rags, such products may have been considered a Question No. 1129, regarding the procedure used by the government luxury, but they have been considered essential for women for quite to verify that Senate appointees meet their constitutional residency some time now.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Two Options for Pay Equity: Complete Compensation Or No Laws at All
    Legislating Under the Influence: Is the Impaired Driving Act Constitutional? Introduction As the Trudeau government sought to fulfill its campaign promise of legalizing cannabis with Bill C-45 (The Cannabis Act), it also introduced a complementary bill to address impaired driving last May. The Impaired Driving Act, or Bill C-46, was introduced by Justice Minister Wilson-Raybould and passed the same week as C-45. The purpose of C-46 is “to simplify the investigation and prosecution of impaired driving offences.”[1] However, it is also an effort to “strengthen the legislative penalties for impaired driving,” which is one of the most common criminal convictions in the country.[2] C-46 is the criminal or regulatory component of C-45. It criminalizes driving under the influence of drugs, including cannabis. The law replaces the existing framework for impaired driving and stiffens the penalties for driving under the influence of drugs and alcohol. It has two parts: the first part addresses drug-impaired driving offences and proposes a framework for roadside testing of drivers “based on a reasonable suspicion of impairment.” The second part deals with alcohol impaired driving. It makes enforcement more readily available to police officers and penalties for impaired driving are now even steeper[3] Given the heinous nature of drinking and driving, the bill was expected to receive widespread support and pass without any opposition. However, the bill was characterized as being full of legal ‘holes’ and errors, and was a source of contention between the House of Commons and the Senate.[4] Multiple lawmakers and legal organizations have expressed their concerns about the constitutionality of the bill and its implications.
    [Show full text]
  • CLEAN GROWTH and CLIMATE CHANGE: HOW CANADA CAN LEAD INTERNATIONALLY Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development
    CLEAN GROWTH AND CLIMATE CHANGE: HOW CANADA CAN LEAD INTERNATIONALLY Report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development John Aldag, Chair APRIL 2019 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION The proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees are hereby made available to provide greater public access. The parliamentary privilege of the House of Commons to control the publication and broadcast of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees is nonetheless reserved. All copyrights therein are also reserved. Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Debates
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 147 Ï NUMBER 094 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 41st PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Monday, June 2, 2014 Speaker: The Honourable Andrew Scheer CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 5961 HOUSE OF COMMONS Monday, June 2, 2014 The House met at 11 a.m. Hamilton, and which I am on most days when I am back in the constituency. Prayers Despite all of these accomplishments and many more, above all else Lincoln Alexander was a champion of young people. He was convinced that if a society did not take care of its youth, it would have no future. He also knew that education and awareness were PRIVATE MEMBERS' BUSINESS essential in changing society's prejudices and sometimes flawed presuppositions about others. That is why it is so fitting that so many Ï (1105) schools are named after him. He himself had been a young person [English] who sought to make his place in his community so that he could contribute to his country. LINCOLN ALEXANDER DAY ACT Mr. David Sweet (Ancaster—Dundas—Flamborough—West- As a young boy, Lincoln Alexander faced prejudice daily, but his dale, CPC) moved that Bill S-213, An Act respecting Lincoln mother encouraged him to be two or three times as good as everyone Alexander Day, be read the second time and referred to a committee. else, and indeed he was. Lincoln Alexander followed his mother's He said: Mr. Speaker, I was proud to introduce Bill S-213, an act advice and worked hard to overcome poverty and prejudice.
    [Show full text]
  • Petro-Politics and the Staples State in an Era of Climate Crisis
    Dismantling dependency, disarming a boom: petro-politics and the staples state in an era of climate crisis by Paul Noble B.A., University of Victoria, 2010 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Political Science © Paul Noble, 2015 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Supervisory Committee Dismantling dependency, disarming a boom: petro-politics and the staples state in an era of climate crisis by Paul Noble B.A., University of Victoria, 2010 Supervisory Committee Dr. James Lawson (Department of Political Science) Supervisor Dr. James Rowe (Department of Political Science) Second Reader iii Abstract Supervisory Committee Dr. James Lawson (Department of Political Science) Supervisor Dr. James Rowe (Department of Political Science) Second Reader This thesis has two central objectives. First, drawing on both the insights contained in the staples approach and the frames and narratives mobilized by contemporary political actors, it attempts to provide insight into the political-economic drivers underpinning the large and growing political influence of the Canadian oil sands. Second, it assesses the effects of this influence on Canadian society and the Canadian state. This influence is observable materially, as with the federal government’s oil sands-oriented policy changes and mobilization of the state security apparatus in its defense, and in less concrete ways, as with the rise of discourses conflating national interest with continued oil sands expansion. This thesis concludes that the effects of this influence have been negative and profound, and in an era of climate crisis, alternatives to Canada’s dominant political economic trends must be urgently sought.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Carbon Curse: a Study of the Governance Foundations of Climate Change Politics in Australia, Canada and Norway
    Beyond the Carbon Curse: a Study of the Governance Foundations of Climate Change Politics in Australia, Canada and Norway by Nathan C Lemphers A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Nathan Lemphers 2020 Beyond the Carbon Curse: A study of the governance foundations of climate change politics in Australia, Canada and Norway Nathan Lemphers Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2020 Abstract Without risking hyperbole, climate change is the greatest political challenge humanity has ever faced. The world must achieve net-zero emissions by mid-century if the most catastrophic damage is to be avoided. The prospect of environmental transformation is most remote for major fossil fuel-exporting countries. Yet amongst the world’s largest exporters of carbon, three countries are more likely to make a transition: Australia, Canada and Norway. Across these three countries, significant climate policy variation exists. Norway developed an early, broad, diverse and durable suite of climate policies compared to Australia and Canada. In this dissertation, I explain the climate policy variation of these three countries and why responses from sympathetic governments were able to make headway and entrench policies in some cases but not others. A novel analytical framework is created to explain these outcomes using within-case process tracing and a comparative case study. Data is obtained largely through interviews with 124 informants and primary document analysis. II My central finding is that the governance foundations of climate policy are critical in explaining climate policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Oil and the Decline of Democracy in Canada
    ALBERTA OIL AND THE DECLINE OF DEMOCRACY IN CANADA edited by MEENAL SHRIVASTAVA & LORNA STEFANICK Copyright © 2015 Meenal Shrivastava and Lorna Stefanick Published by AU Press, Athabasca University 1200, 10011 – 109 Street, Edmonton, AB T5J 3S8 ISBN 978-1-77199-029-5 (print) 978-1-77199-030-1 (PDF) 978-1-77199-032-5 (epub) doi: 10.15215/aupress/9781771990295.01 Cover design by Natalie Olsen, kisscutdesign.com. Interior design by Sergiy Kozakov. Printed and bound in Canada by Marquis Book Printers. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Alberta oil and the decline of democracy in Canada / edited by Meenal Shrivastava and Lorna Stefanick. Includes bibliographical references and index. Issued in print and electronic formats. 1. Petroleum industry and trade—Political aspects—Alberta. 2. Petroleum industry and trade—Social aspects—Alberta. 3. Petroleum industry and trade—Government policy—Alberta. 4. Democracy—Alberta. I. Shrivastava, Meenal, 1971-, author, editor II. Stefanick, Lorna, 1961-, author, editor HD9574.C23A54 2015 338.2'7282097123 C2015-904346-8 C2015-904347-6 We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada. Assistance provided by the Government of Alberta, Alberta Multimedia Development Fund. This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License, Attribution– Noncommercial–NoDerivative Works 4.0 International: see www.creativecommons. org. The text may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes, provided that credit is given to the original author. To obtain permission for uses beyond those outlined in the Creative Commons license, please contact AU Press, Athabasca University, at [email protected]. The illustrations that open each part are reproduced courtesy of the artist, Sylvie Roussel–Janssens, www.lsclight.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Created a Political Firestorm
    Research & innovation policy briefing pp. 13-24 Jaccard offers David Get a grip Crane on money- sage advice on p.18 laundering how citizens can problems fight change p. 31 in Canada p. 29 HOH p.2 Michael Harris p.10 THIRTY-SECOND YEAR, NO. 1825 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSPAPER MONDAY, MAY 10, 2021 $5.00 News News News Thousands of ‘You are walking expiring Conservative on eggshells’: Party memberships Bill C-10: how infectious disease this month throwing docs say ‘trust in a wrench in the vaccines is fragile,’ nomination process, closing the YouTube NACI guidance say Conservatives unhelpful BY ABBAS RANA BY MIKE LAPOINTE he thousands of Conservative ‘loophole’ created a TParty memberships expiring ast week’s messaging from this month are adding another Lthe National Advisory Com- layer of complexity in the nomi- mittee on Immunization (NACI) nation process as candidates are about the AstraZeneca vaccine already facing an uphill battle has eroded trust in public health political firestorm communications, say infectious to sign up new members in the midst of the ongoing pandemic, disease experts. say Conservatives. NACI officials said last week Heritage Minister that getting the AstraZeneca and “Everything’s more difficult in Steven Guilbeault a pandemic, door-to-door knock- Johnson & Johnson vaccines has come under fire made sense for some Canadians, ing efforts to try to get support for changes to his bill for the individual, potential but that the higher risk that those to update Canada's two could cause dangerous blood Broadcasting Act. Continued on page 26 As of late last week, Continued on page 6 Bill C-10 was still before the House Heritage Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • 889 Will We Ever Have Paris? Canada's
    CANADA’S CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY AND FEDERALISM 3.0 889 WILL WE EVER HAVE PARIS? CANADA’S CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY AND FEDERALISM 3.0 JASON MACLEAN* Global climate change is at the point where politics as usual is not sufficient to combat it. The author argues that a new conceptualization of constitutionalism and federalism will be required to respond to this change. What the author calls federalism 3.0 will be a bottom-up approach to politics, where individuals are empowered by governments and institutions to shape climate policy. This bottom-up approach is encapsulated in the Paris Climate Change Agreement. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has publicly declared Canada’s commitment to climate leadership through mobilizing all elements of Canadian society. However, the author argues Trudeau’s policies to date are merely an example of formalistic, check-the-box constitutionalism, rather than substantive, federalism 3.0. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................. 890 II. THE PARIS CLIMATE CHANGE AGREEMENT ....................... 893 A. A BOTTOM-UP APPROACH TO GLOBAL COOPERATION AND NORM BUILDING ................. 894 B. CANADA AND THE “HIGH AMBITION COALITION” .............. 897 C. MIND THE AMBITION GAP! ............................... 898 III. CANADIAN CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY AND FEDERALISM 1.0 — PASSING THE BUCK ....................................... 900 A. THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONTROVERSY THAT WASN’T (AND STILL ISN’T) .......................... 901 B. FEDERALISM 2.0: COOPERATION AND HARMONIZATION, OR STILL PASSING THE BUCK? ............................. 903 C. WHATEVER HAPPENED TO THE FEDERAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ACT?................... 907 IV. CANADIAN CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY AND FEDERALISM 3.0 — FROM RETRENCHMENT TO RESTORING CANADIANS’ TRUST ........ 909 A. CANADA’S THIRD NATIONAL POLICY, OR LET’S TALK TV? ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..164 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)
    House of Commons Debates VOLUME 148 Ï NUMBER 255 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 42nd PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, February 1, 2018 Speaker: The Honourable Geoff Regan CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 16607 HOUSE OF COMMONS Thursday, February 1, 2018 The House met at 10 a.m. Action Against Systemic Racism and Religious Discrimination Including Islamophobia”. I would like to thank the MP for Mississauga—Erin Mills for Prayer starting us on this course of study. Diversity is our strength, and the recommendations in this report will make us even stronger. Mr. David Anderson (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC): Mr. ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS Speaker, it is my privilege to rise to comment on the Conservative Ï (1005) Party's dissenting report on Motion No. 103. [Translation] We have given voice to moderate Muslims' concerns about the INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS implications of Islamophobia, both as a term and as a concept. Our report includes five sections, one addressing the Liberals' assertion Hon. Denis Paradis (Brome—Missisquoi, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, that we face a rising climate of hate and fear in Canada, one pursuant to Standing Order 34(1), I have the honour to present to the addressing the over two dozen different definitions of “Islamopho- House, in both official languages, the report of the Canadian bia”, and another on religious discrimination in Canada. We also parliamentary delegation to the Canada-France Interparliamentary address the issue of data collection, and end with the assertion that Association respecting its participation at the 45th annual meeting solutions can be found not in a whole-of-government approach, but held in Marseille and Paris, France, from April 10 to 14, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Majority of Participants Say Energy Discourse in Canada Has Become
    Majority of participants say energy discourse in Canada has become more polarized in past eighteen months Positive Energy Panel | Summary Conducted by Nanos for Positive Energy, October 2019 Submission 2019-1426 SUMMARY Four years ago, Nanos with Positive Energy at University of Ottawa designed and implemented the Energy and Environmental Leaders Panel, which brings together university experts and key decision- makers from industry, government, Indigenous communities, local communities and environmental organizations to share their thoughts on Canada’s energy future in an age of climate change. To follow are the key findings of the third wave of panel research. Nearly all participants of this study responded that energy discourse in Canada has become more polarized in the past eighteen months. Over eight in ten environment and energy leaders believe climate change is definitely occurring in their personal view. Just under three in five of the leaders think climate Over half of change is mostly caused by humans and just under one in four leaders think it is somewhat more human leaders think caused. climate change is Over half of leaders strongly agree that the federal government needs to develop a long term energy mostly human vision for Canada – even if some provinces don’t agree with it. Three in five leaders strongly agreed or caused, while agreed that Canada needs to produce more renewable energy, even if it raises the cost of electricity for under one in four business and consumers. say it is somewhat more Climate Change human caused • A majority of leaders believe climate change is definitely occurring in their personal view – A majority of leaders say they believe climate change is definitely occurring (84%) while just over one in ten believe it is probably occurring (13%).
    [Show full text]