Preview of the 2009 Finals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preview of the 2009 Finals Preview of the 2009 Finals The finalists for TeamBuild 2009 have been announced! The standards were extremely high this year, and our new panel of judges were very impressed by all the submissions. The standard is as good as any in previous years. It has been extremely difficult to choose the nine finalist teams. In these few pages the finalists are listed. This shows the important part your organisation’s members play in the event and a sneak preview of the finals weekend to be held on the 20th-22nd November. If you have any questions or would like any more information, please contact any one of our team. Yours Sincerely, Richard Rooley (Founder of TeamBuild) & the Working Party Chairman of Judges Richard Rooley Judges mentor/ APM Richard Schofield IStructE & ICE Ruth Bailey (Co chair) [email protected] RIBA Alex MacLaren (Co Chair) [email protected] CIBSE, CIWEM Henry Nicholson [email protected] Law Society Gemma Houghton [email protected] ICE James Doran [email protected] Event Organiser Richard Hart [email protected] TeamBuild 2009 The Finalists Team Names Companies Represented Locations Institutions represented Build Ove Arup & Partners London IStructE, ARB, RICS, ICE Robert Dye Associates Ove Arup & Partners Abbey Pynford Cloud Mitie Engineering Services Herts CIBSE, APM, CIOB, ARB, IStructE Vinci Construction UK Aedas Architects Walsh Associates CoDesign Arup London RIBA, ICE, IET, RICS Multiplicity Buro Happold London IStructE, RIBA, ICE, CIOB, CIBSE Foster + Partners Corderoy Mosaic Wyatt MacLaren LLP London RIBA, RICE, IStructE, ICE, CIOB, Davis Langdon Law Society Robert Bird Group Westfield Shoppingtowns Ltd Mayer Brown International LLP Re:Generation AECOM London ACGI, RIBA, CIOB RLB Skanska rEvolve BDP London CIBSE, ICE, RAIA, APM, IOA, MBIDA London, Sheffield, IStructE, RICS, CIBSE, RIBA, RUBIx Robert Bird & Partners Birmingham CIOB Davis Langdon Arup Studio E Architects Mace Group Totus Arup Sheffield ICE, IMechE, RIBA, IStructE TeamBuild 2009 Entrant Statistics Sponsoring Entrants this Institution Entrants this Companies entering Institutions year year this year Abbey Pynford Mace Group Construction Skills n/a (currently not a sponsor) AECOM Martin Associates ICE 28 (24%) AHMM Max Fordham RICS 12 (10%) Mayer Brown CIBSE 8 (7%) RIBA 12 (10%) Arup (Bristol) Internetional LLP Mitie Engineering CIOB 6 (5%) APM 3 Arup (London) Services IStructE 20 (17%) Arup (Sheffield) Poole Dick Associates ARB 5 Associated Architects Price + Myers SCL 3 (2.5%) IMechE 4 Reynolds Porter Worshipful Company of n/a BDP (London) Chamberlain LLP IET 4 Constructors BDP (Manchester) RLB LI 2 Worshipful Company of n/a Bennets Associates Architects Robert Bird Group Chartered Architects CIAT 0 Bouygues UK Robert Dye Associates Buro Happold RPC Overseas Architectural 4 Corderoy Skanska IOA 2 Southern Housing TeamBuild is supported by; Davis Langdon Group Ltd CIWEM 2 EDAW Structuretone RTPI 1 Expedition Engineering Studio E Architects The Tudor Rose ACGI 1 Fathful & Gould Partnership Fluid Structures VINCI Construction UK IHT 1 Foster + Partners Walsh Associates Westfield Shopping Gardiner & Theobald Towns Ltd Gifford White Design Jane Wernick WSP Carillion London Borough of Camden Wyatt MacLaren LLP TeamBuild is sponsored by; TeamBuild 2009: What happens at the finals? 2008 “Teambuild is an unique training Overall Winners opportunity on “joined-up thinking” for Building Blocks construction. It’s a model for the Winners All participants have an opportunity to learn of industry as a whole as it strives to new skills, build confidence and appreciate integrate and focus on customer value first hand the power pf planning, team and collaborative working.” dynamics and collaborative problem solving. Richard Saxon It is an immensely rewarding experience for Master, Worshipful Company of Chartered teams, organisers and judges, an Architects opportunity to meet new people, share ideas and above all, win or lose, enjoy an exciting (and exhausting!) weekend.” Richard Schofield Winners of the Contract Strategy Prize Winners of the Judges’ Prize APM/ RICS Urban Garden Team Goal Teambuild has proven to be the starting "A very steep learning curve which gave me point for further collaboration both with our a good understanding of how disciplines work own team members as well other new together" friends made on the weekend. It goes "Excellent exercises and scenarios" without saying that we all learnt a great "A very enjoyable weekend which provided a deal during the weekend not only about great learning opportunity. I have a greater other disciplines but also about ourselves understanding of the construction process as too. 10/10!” Evan Shields, Making Who will be the TeamBuild 2009 winners? a whole" MINT Spaces A press release to announce the winners will be sent out on Monday 23rd November. A full report of the event will be sent to all sponsoring organizations and companies represented before the end of the year. To request a copy of the report please email [email protected]..
Recommended publications
  • City-REDI Policy Briefing Series
    City-REDI Policy Briefing Series March Image Image 2018 Part B Carillion’s Collapse: Consequences Dr Amir Qamar & Professor Simon Collinson Carillion, the second-largest construction firm in the UK, were proud of their commitment to support regional growth and small-scale suppliers. As part of this commitment they directed 60% of project expenditure to local economies. Following the collapse of the firm, this positive multiplier effect became a significant, negative multiplier effect, particularly damaging to small-scale suppliers in the construction industry. The aim of this policy brief is to examine the consequences of Carillion’s demise, many of which are only now surfacing. One of the fundamental lessons that we can learn from Carillion’s collapse is about these ‘contagion’ effects. As we saw in the 2008 financial crisis, the businesses that underpin the economic health of the country are connected and strongly co-dependent. When a large flagship firm falls it brings down others. This does not mean we need more state intervention. But it does mean we need more intelligent state intervention. One of the fundamental lessons that the Government can learn from the Carillion episode is that it has a significant responsibility as a key customer, using public sector funds for public sector projects, to monitor the health of firms and assess the risks prior to issuing PPI and other contracts. 1 Introduction The collapse of Carillion, the second-largest construction firm in the UK, has had a significant, negative knock-on effect, particularly on small-scale suppliers in the industry. In total, Carillion was comprised of 326 subsidiaries, of which 199 were in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Construct Zero: the Performance Framework
    Performance Framework Version 1 Foreword As Co-Chair of the Construction Leadership The Prime Minister has been clear on the Council, I’m delighted to welcome you to importance of the built environment sector in ‘Construct Zero: The Performance Framework. meeting his target for the UK to reduce its carbon The Prime Minister has set out the global emissions by 78% compared to 1900 levels by importance of climate change, and the need for 2035. Put simply, the built environment accounts for collective action from firms and individuals 43% of UK emissions, without its contribution- we across the UK, to address the challenge of will not meet this target, and support the creation of climate change and achieve net zero carbon 250,000 green jobs. emissions in the UK by 2050. Therefore, I’m delighted the Construction Never before has there been such a strong Leadership Council (CLC) is leading the sector’s collective desire across the political spectrum, response to this challenge, through the Construct society, and businesses for us to step up to the Zero change programme. Building on the success challenge. We all have a responsibility to step of the sector’s collaborations during COVID, the up and take action now to protect the next CLC has engaged the industry to develop the generation, our children’s children. It is our Performance Framework, which sets out how the duty to do so, as citizens, parents, and leaders sector will commit to, and measure it’s progress to enable and provide a better world for our towards, Net Zero.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Benefit of the Improving the UK's Nuclear Supply Chain
    The economic benefit of improving the UK's nuclear supply chain capabilities March 2013 March 2013 Contents Executive summary ................................................................................... 3 1 The Nuclear supply chain in the UK ............................................. 13 2 Consultation findings..................................................................... 17 3 International case studies ............................................................. 27 4 Economic impact of nuclear new build – gross impacts........................................................................................... 35 5 Net impact of capability improvements........................................ 61 6 Realising the potential ................................................................... 75 7 Conclusions and summary............................................................ 86 Annex A: Technical annex ...................................................................... 95 Annex B: Sectoral GVA and employment forecasts................................................................................................. 112 Annex C: References............................................................................. 119 The economic benefit of improving the UK's nuclear supply chain capabilities March 2013 Executive summary This study by Oxford Economics and Atkins, quantifies some of the potential economic impacts associated with developing the capabilities of the UK's nuclear supply chain1. The study takes place against
    [Show full text]
  • Circular Options for Building Services: Case Studies; 22 Gordon Street, Arup Circular Building Final Report: December 2018
    Circular options for building services: Case Studies; 22 Gordon Street, Arup Circular Building Final Report: December 2018 Ben Croxford (UCL), Ramon Mendoza (UCL), Simon-Joe Portal (Arup), Dimitrios Rovas (UCL) Project funders: The Bartlett Innovation Fund, and Arup UCL Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering (IEDE), The Bartlett, UCL Faculty of the Built Environment Executive summary The circular economy concept has gained momentum over recent years, but few have analysed its application to the building services sector. This project aims to contribute to unravelling this opportunity (and its constraints) as a joint interest between UCL IEDE, UCL Estates, and Arup, to create useful guidelines for the industry. Building services fall within the ‘sweet spot’ for applying circular economy strategies. Some of the sector’s biggest issues such as; specialty equipment with high (upfront) costs, fast obsolescence, maintenance issues and costs, and the well-known performance gap can be dealt with by applying some of the strategies discussed in this report. Using the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s building blocks and ReSOLVE levers framework, the CIBSE TM56 report on Resource Efficiency in Building Services, and circular case studies found in the industry, this paper sets the base to understand the application of circular economy to building services. Two case studies are analysed: 22 Gordon Street, as a business-as-usual design and construction project with a standard RIBA stages process and The Circular Building by Arup, as a temporary test lab where circular strategies were tested and products assembled together and successfully dismantled at the end of use. Interviews were carried out with four decision-makers involved in the design of 22 Gordon Street and three in The Circular Building to understand the decisions (and reasons) that influenced the selection of certain building services and their circularity according to the previous literature guidelines reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle East Property & Construction Handbook 2010/2011
    MIDDLE EAST PROPERTY & CONSTRUCTION HANDBOOK 2010/2011 1 2 MIDDLE EAST PROPERTY & CONSTRUCTION HANDBOOK 2010/2011 Middle East Offices Abu Dhabi, UAE [email protected] +971 2 444 2040 Beirut, Lebanon [email protected] +961 1 780 111 Doha, Qatar [email protected] +974 4458 0150 Dubai, UAE [email protected] +971 4 423 3690 Manama, Bahrain [email protected] +973 17 588 796 Riyadh, KSA [email protected] +966 1 463 2625 Cairo, Egypt (North Africa) [email protected] +974 5581 7035 / +44 7740 922 931 1 1 DAVIS LANGDON An AECOM company 3 Global presence 3 Rich Middle East history 4 Industry awards 4 2 GLOBAL CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS The bigger picture 7 Sector specialists 7 Cohesive solutions 7 Thought leaders 8 3 ECONOMIC ROUND UP Country statistics 2009 11 Economic trends and outlook 12 Construction inflation trends and outlook 17 4 ARTICLES Spotlight on Syria 23 Grand Prix racing – on track in the Middle East 27 Property service charges and the Dubai Strata law 31 High speed rail – high risk, high cost, high rewards 35 Adding value through sustainability management 40 Case study – King Abdulaziz Centre for World Culture 45 Regional integration and potential for religious 50 tourism sector Building information modelling – cost and value 55 drivers for integrated working Bridging the gap – the demand for social infrastucture 58 2 Public private partnership (PPP’s) 61 Development management – creating a viable scheme 66 5 REFERENCE ARTICLES Procurement routes 73
    [Show full text]
  • Design & Build
    Media Pack Design & Build UK Volume 9 Issue 2 - 2016 Design & Build UK Market report reveals timber windows set to outperform overall housing market with period of sustained growth - P.46 “We Are delighted to Have Achieved Such Success at this Year’s Highways England Supplier Recognition Scheme” - Kier Executive Director, Dave Wright - P.50 The UK’s Tallest Buildings 2015 National Procurement & Fulham High Street Site Highlighted - P.14 Supply Chain Awards - P.35 Development - P.64 Design and Build Publishing Ltd www.designandbuilduk.net Facts and Figures Users: 100 million people pass by Piccadilly Circus each year Tallest Buildings Client: Land Securities Piccadilly Lights Local authority: Westminster City Council Area: 210,090sqft Status: Planning permission granted in March 2016 in the UK Structural engineer: Waterman Structures Planning consultant: JLL Services consultant: D Long + Partners Townscape consultant: Citydesigner Transport consultant: Momentum Cost consultant: RLB One Canada Square The Shard Market report reveals timber windows set to outperform Height (m): 235 overall housing market with period of sustained growth Fletcher Priest has won planning approval of Boris Johnson, solves the jigsaw puzzle of We hope to revive the area and capture permission for a scheme to revive one of uses and apparently contradictory interests, with a the essence of its history and identity Height (m): 309 London’s most idiosyncratic and popular playful, rational approach that belies the complexity of - the fascinating story of Monico, from In 2014, according to Palmer Market Research, 2015 Edition, the UK timber window market grew by 17.1% to The Palmer report shows how the structure of the market has changed, with wood windows – mostly now Floors:locations – the urban quarter that is home the50 site.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Smart Cities Directory
    UK Smart Cities Directory UK Smart Cities Directory 2 Contents Introduction 3 Connected Places Catapult 5 The British Standards Instititute 6 UK Ecosystm Overview 7 UK City Case Study - Glasgow 8 UK City Case Study - Peterborough 9 UK City Case Study - Bristol 10 The UK Government’s Industrial Strategy 11 Governance and Standards 13 Governance and Standards companies 14 - 17 Energy and Environment 19 Energy and Environment companies 20 - 26 Health 27 Health companies 28 - 30 Infrastructure 32 Infrastructure companies 33 - 40 Transport and Mobility 42 Transport and Mobility companies 43 - 52 Security 54 Security companies 55 - 59 Smart Buildings 61 Smart Buildings companies 62 - 66 Data Analytics 68 Data Analytics companies 69 - 72 Urban Planning and Project Delivery 74 Urban Planning and Project Delivery companies 75 - 77 3 UK Smart Cities Directory Introduction Urban population growth coupled with climate change present new challenges for densely populated city environments. While these challenges are substantial, they also present a unique opportunity for companies that develop, service and sustain our urban areas. The UK is recognised as a global leader in smart cities primarily because of its creativity and the technological expertise of its human capital. As a result of this, UK companies are regularly solicited by international partners at the highest level to counsel, advise on and implement smart city developments and innovations. The UK technology companies’ leading edge in this field has been built on five key pillars namely access to a growing market – both domestic and international, consumers/users receptive to adopting new technology, high quality infrastructure, a strong regulatory environment and targeted innovation support.
    [Show full text]
  • Steel Focus 6
    FriDay 27/07/2012 in association with The british FriDay 27/07/2012 www.bdonline.co.uk 8 STEEL FOCUS STructuraL Steel Design awards 2012 constructional Steelwork 9 www.bdonline.co.uk Association and Tata steel seat building. Although the team fixed directly onto the outside AWARD considered using a steel arch, of the bowl, and seating terraces The Velodrome has distinctive it always favoured a cable-net were fixed directly to the inside cedar cladding and a lightweight Olympic double London 2012 roof solution, which had rarely with air-handling units inte- cable-net roof. been used in the UK on such a grated into the voids within the VELODRoME large scale. skeletal bowl structure. “Shrink- The structure consists of in- wrapping” the building envelope leads 2012’s Olympic Park, situ concrete for the lower bowl, on to the steel skeleton in this and structural steel for the cedar- way reduced the surface area and London clad upper bowl, topped by an cost of cladding. undulated steel perimeter ring The Velodrome achieved a steel winners Architect Hopkins Architects truss, which restrains the roof Breeam “excellent” rating, assist- Structural engineer cables. The cable-net includes 14 ed by its 29% recycled content, Expedition Engineering km of steel cable, with 36 main lightweight structure and use of Two of the sporting venues built for the cables arranged in pairs at 3.6m natural ventilation. Steelwork contractor centres. It is pulled down hard The judges were impressed by 2012 games are among the six top winners Watson Steel Structures Ltd on to the seating bowl structure the use of lean, sustainable de- for this year’s Structural Steel Design (Severfield-Rowen PLC) below, giving the venue its dis- sign to achieve an iconic sporting Main contractor ISG Construction tinctive roof form.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Consultants 190511
    CROSSRAIL - CRL RETAINED MAIN AND SECONDARY DESIGNERS 15 MARCH 2011 FDC SubConsultant FDC Consultant FDC Design Package C272 PIP C300/C410 C305 C310 C315 C330 C340 C350 C405 C411 Bond C412 C421 C422 C430 C435 C501 C502 C503 C510 C511 C512 C520 C610 C620 C625 C630 C631 C644 C650 C660 C670 C680 C807 Tunnels Tunnels Thames Connaught ROP VDP PML Padd Main St Adv Wks Bond St TCR Adv TCR Main Farringdon Farringdon Liverpool St Liverpool St Liverpool St Station Whitechapel Whitechapel Custom Track, Signalling Route Tunnel M&E Platform Traction Non- Station Control / Radio Data Marine West East Tunnel Tunnel Wks Main Wks Wks Wks Adv Wks Main Wks Adv Wks Main Wk Adv Wk Tunnels Adv Wks Main Wks House OHLE & Control Screen Power traction Comms SCADA Transport West Logistics Centre Doors Power GiaEquation Atkins C100 - Architectural Components Design Grimshaw Atkins C100 - Architectural Components Design Schulmann Smith Mott MacDonald C102 - Material and Workmanship Specifications Corderoy Mott MacDonald C121 - Sprayed Concrete Linings (SCL) Design Main Main Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Main Secondary Secondary Gall Zeidler Mott MacDonald C121 - Sprayed Concrete Linings (SCL) Design Main Main Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Main Secondary Secondary London Bridge Associates Mott MacDonald C121 - Sprayed Concrete Linings (SCL) Design Main Main Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary Secondary
    [Show full text]
  • List of Attendees to Market Testing Event 10Th December 2012
    Project: Strategic Partner Project - Consultancy Services List of attendees to Market Testing Event 10th December 2012 Supplier Supplier Name: 1 Title: 1 Supplier Name: 2 Title: 2 Frankham Consultancy Group Limited Richard Chitty Group Managing Director Carter Jonas LLP Richard Meeson Partner Nick Taylor Partner & Head of Planning Haverstock Associates LLP Claire Barton Partner John Jenkins Consultant Ove Arup and Partners International Ltd Lisa Matthews Senior Engineer Phil Wood Director Selway Joyce Partnership Christopher Hore Director Aedas Architects Ltd Karle Burford Director Churches Engineering Ltd Patrick Saddington Projects Director HLM Architects Richard Parsons Director John Richards Consultant Ubu Design LLP Mark Johnson Partner Richard Willmott Partner WSP UK Ltd Martin Smith Technical Director Peter Day Senior Technical Director AKS Ward Ltd David Perkins Director Brian Ritchie Director Currie & Brown UK Ltd Chris Boyd Divisional Director Simon Lee Director Curtins Consulting Paul Menzies Director DPDS Consulting Group Susan Cupples Business Development Manager Perkins Ogden Architects Mark Ogden Director Paul Pearson Associate AMA Alexi Marmot Associates Ltd Jennifer Singer Partner Davis Langdon Ian Harrison Associate Peter Boote Director Hydrock Group Ltd Jerry King Director Pick Everard Mike Reader Senior Framework Co-ordinator Allan Cowie Director URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Martin Baker Technical Director Mark Lima Associate Architect Amey OW Ltd Will Warner Account Manager David Gillham Technical Director
    [Show full text]
  • Total Levy Paid & Grant Received by Employers Counted in Each
    14 July 2020 CITB Head Office Sand Martin House Bittern Way Peterborough PE2 8TY Email: [email protected] www.citb.co.uk Dear Freedom of Information Request 2020-011 Thank you for contacting CITB requesting information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). In your request, dated 16 June 2020, you asked for the following: 1. Please provide the figures for the total levy paid and grant received by employers counted in each prescribed organisation in 2019? 2. Please provide the 2018 and 2019 figures for the total levy paid and grant received by employers who stated a federation on their levy return form affiliated to Build UK. Please specify the levy paid and grant received for each of the affiliated Build UK federations. My response is as follows: 1. Please provide the figures for the total levy paid and grant received by employers counted in each prescribed organisation in 2019? The levy amount due is based upon an annual Levy Assessment, which in turn is based upon an employer’s Levy Return. In responding to your request for the total levy paid in 2019, we have based this on the levy due for the financial year April 2019 – March 2020, compiled from the assessment of the 2018 Levy Returns. The figures on the table below, for both levy and grant, therefore relate to the 2019/20 financial year. Prescribed Organisation Grant Levy British Woodworking Federation (BWF) 818,182 1,056,318 Build UK 15,866,527 34,095,229 Civil Engineering Contractors Association (CECA) 11,588,445 16,959,860 Construction Plant-hire Association
    [Show full text]
  • Housebuilder & Developer
    Housebuilder HbD & Developer August 2016 EDI’s Edinburgh mixed use scheme reinvents former brewery site Croydon MP takes on Housing and Planning Call for more creativity from centre on housing Features in this issue Supplement Plus the latest Eco & Green Products Doors, Windows & Conservatories news, events and Interiors products Landscaping & External Finishes Also this month Rainwater & Greywater Products HBD speaks to HBF’s John Stewart Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) Exclusive column from Brian Berry www.hbdonline.co.uk Reader Enquiry 401 HbD Contents August 2016 23 HEADLINES Gavin Barwell appointed as 5 Housing and Planning Minister Brian Berry discusses an 7 SME housebuilding renaissance Government quality push backed 9 by LABC ALSO IN THIS ISSUE... Industry news 4 - 27 Events 19 Industry Movers 22 Product Focus 26 Doors, Windows & Conservatories Supplement 29 - 39 41 Choose high efficiency insulation, naturally Duncan Voice from Insulation Superstore looks at the reasons why construction specifiers are increasingly investing in the benefits of eco PRODUCTS insulation products. Appointments & News 26 Building Products & Services 28 Eco & Green Products 40 - 42 45 Smart looks, smart operation Finance & Insurance 42 - 43 Fires & Fireplaces 43 The ‘wow’ factor can be achieved in new homes combined with cost- Floors & Floor Coverings 43 effective smart lighting and audio control to provide the best of both worlds Glass & Glazing 44 for developers. One company is realising the benefits in several new schemes. Interiors 45 - 46 Kitchens & Appliances 46 - 47 Landscaping & External Finishes 46 - 50 Rainwater & Greywater Products 51 - 53 48 Roofing 53 - 54 Safe, secure and sustainable Smoke & Fire Protection 54 Paul Garlick of green wall systems company Mobilane looks at the challenge Stairs, Balustrades & Balconies 57 of installing boundaries that satisfy safety and security requirements, as well Stonework & Masonry 57 as being eco-friendly.
    [Show full text]