The Shannon Estua Y Defences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Shannon Estua Y Defences The Shannon Estua y Defences. The Shannon across the Shannon and an attack on A striking example during the Dublin would have had most chance of Navoleonic wars of the effectiveness of The British authorities in Ireland were success. fortifying natural features to improve well aware of the strategic importance of General Humbert's campaign in late their defensive potential was the the Shannon. The river barrier had been August and September, 1798, illustrated construction of the 'Lines of Torres a significant factor in the closing stages the importance of the Shannon, and its Vedras' by the British and Portuguese of the Williamite War of 1688-91. On that lakes (and particularly the strategic forces under Wellington, keeping the occasion the attack came from the east, importance of the crossing points at fords French army out of Southern Portugal the Irish defence of Connaught being and bridges) as a line of defence against a during the winter of 1810-11. Although essentially along the line of the Shannon, French expedition landing in Connaught the Portuguese mountain terrain is quite giving prominence to such fortified river- with the intention of marching on different to the comparatively, flat crossing points as Athlone and Limerick, Dublin, the natural objective of any country of the middle Shannon, it is as well-as to other locations with invasion force. The United Irishmen of interesting that the 'Lines' were temporary defences such as Lanesboro, Longford and Westmeath had assembled approximately 30 miles long, the same as Banagher and Portumna. to join Humbert, and after heading the length of the Shannon between Between 1769 and 1770, Charles towards Sligo, he turned south-east Lough Derg and Lough Ree. Vallencey, later to become Director of having crossed the Shannon north of 'A General Statement of the quantity Engineers in Ireland, worked on maps Carrick-on-Shannon, with the idea of and tenure of land required by the and plans to accompany Lord marching on Dublin. He was finally Government for the service of Towers Townsend's report on the defence of surrounded at Ballinamuck by a British and Batteries along the coast, the works Ireland. The Shannon river-crossings force vastly superior in numbers, and at Athlone, along the Shannon, Clonony were evidently included in this work. forced to surrender. and on Bear Island. Engineer Office French invasion plans in 1796 The strategic importance of Athlone Dublin, 29th January 1806', (State Paper included Galway Bay as a suitable was also demonstrated on this occasion, Office, Dublin Castle 531 No. 230/2) landing place, providing reasonably easy as was the importance of the Grand gives details of proposed and existing access across Ireland to Dublin, by CanaI as a rapid means of transporting defences along this part of the Shannon. crossing the Shannon between ~ou~htroops and equipment from Dublin Derg and Lough Ree. Direct landings at towards the Shannon. The Athlone The Estuary Belfast, Dublin or Wexford were not garrison was increased, the Castle eventually attempted, due to the British repaired and rebuilt, and during the The mouth of the Shannon was one of control of the Irish Sea. The various early years of the nineteenth century the three invasion areas included in the French expeditions between 1796 and extensive fortifications were built to the French Directory's instructions to Vice- 1798 were therefore directed at the south- west of the town. Admiral Villaret de -,loveuse in October, west, west and north-west coasts of The Shannon between Portumna and 1796, during" the 1vre~arations A of the Ireland, in order to avoid contact with Athlone, a distance along the river itself- -pedition to Ireland. The suggested units of the British Navy. Of all the of about 30 miles, was strengthened as a landing places in order to preference proposed or attemptgd landings in defensive line by works at Meelick and were given as Galway Bay, Bantry Bay Ireland at this tide, perhaps a Incherky Island to cover fords, and at and the Shannon estuary. Part of the disembarkation on the shores of Galway Banagher and Shannonbridge to form orders issued to the ship's captains of the Bay, followed by a rapid march inland bridgehead defences. French Fleet that finally arrived in Bantry The Shannon, near Tarbert. Bay in December, 1796, included a The Shannon estuary provided 1806 and 1815. No mention of these rendezvous at the mouth of the Shannon, several harbours, landing places and batteries or heir sites is made in the State in case of separation and failure to meet anchorages suitable for landing troops Paper office list of land required for off Mizen Head in West Cork. and unloading artillery and stores, a defence work the east coast, the Upper After several days waiting and good anchorage being provided by Shannon and in Bantry Bay, dated 29 indecision in Bantry Bay, Wolfe Tone on Tarbert roads, the part of the river partly January, 1806, (S.P.0 531 No. 230/2) board the ship-of-the-line Indomptable sheltered by Tarbert Island to the west General Dumouriez, in his Military was in favour of the ships that still and north-west. Memoir on the Defence of Ireland, 2 January, remained in the bay on 27th December The Topographical Dictionary of Ireland 1808, advocated siting batteries at the (seven sail of the line and one frigate) by Lewis, published some twenty years narrow mouth (about two miles wide) of attempting a landing at the mouth of the after the end of the Napoleonic Wars, the river. A battery was subsequently Shannon. As the ships-of-the-line were describes this anchorage: built on the northern shore here - on each carrying between 500 and 600 Tarbert: Affording a safe and Kilcredaun Point. He also suggested a hundred soldiers, and the frigates commodious roadstead for about 150 battery on Carrig Island anda fort on evidently had on board about 250 to 300, vessels of the largest class, may be Scattery Island; batteries were in fact a total of perhaps 4,000 men could have considered an asylum harbour. Sheltered built in these two locations later. Also been landed. on N.W. by the Island of Tarbert- proposed were a fort on 'Killahin' It is possible that if even this force had connected by a narrow causeway for foot promontory (this is presumably Kilkerin been put ashore somewhere in the passengers and cut off by high water Point where a battery was built) and a Shannon estuary it would have had a springs. battery on Foynes Island. Dumouriez chance of capturing Limerick, and have The Ordnance Survey Maps of 1840-42 does not mention Tarbert Island, been at least as effective as Humbert's show a total of six coastal batteries presumably because of the seven gun expedition in August, 1798, which located in the Shannon estuary, together battery already in existence at the time of consisted of only 1,019 French troops. with the site of a battery on Foynes his report. Small detachments of the government Island further upstream. These batteries Included in his proposal for the forces regular, fencible and militia, in were: on the north or Clare shore from defence of the estuary were the use of Kerry, Limerick and Cork had been sent the west, at Kilcredaun Point, Doonaha, gunboats (useful in restricted and on forced marches down towards Bantry, and ~ilkerinPoint (opposite Tarbert shallow water, and in calm weather and were assembling at positions Island): on the south or County Kerry against much larger vessels), bomb- between Bantry and Cork, in such towns shore at Corran Point on Carrig Island, ketches and fireships. These were to be as Bandon and Mallow. and on Tarbert Island; and in the centre moored or anchored in various locations, Consequently, a French landing at the of the estuary on the southern point of below Kilrush, in Tarbert Roads and lower Shannon would certainly have met Scattery Island. further upstream. Presumably, some of with little opposition by land forces, the The battery or fort at Tarbert Island these vessels would have been manned Limerick garrison being at least two days was of a different plan to the other by the 'Sea Fencibles', the naval reserve march from Tarbert. The Irish Militia by Shannon batteries, and dates from the of the period made up of merchant Sir Henry McAnally describes how the mid 1790s.. It is not shown on Cowan's seamen and fishermen, and commanded Londonderry militia company stationed chart of the Shannon, dating from after by naval officers. at Tarbert marched to Mallow, joining the 1794, but is indicated on a military map "TheShannon estuary batteries are all other companies of the Londonderry, and in the National Library (ref. 16L 181, of similar layout with the exception of the Louth and Westmeath qilitia, which which dates from between 1793 and 1798, the earlier battery at Tarbert which had all been marched frdin Limerick forming part of a military survey of resembled an obtuse pointed bastion in during the first days of the French Fleet Ireland by Vallencey. The remaining plan. being in Bantry. batteries were presumably built between The battery in each case is semi- the removal of the stonework causing th counterscarp and rampart to gradua collapse. The blockhouse remains; t I doorway having been altered a extended in recent years to form an opening at ground level. The roof level gun-platform, with its positions for the two howitzers, is approached from #irst floor level by a staircase built within fhe wall thickness. Some loose masonry Was fallen from the inner part of the massive surrounding parapet.
Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material
    18_121726-bindex.qxp 4/17/09 2:59 PM Page 486 Index See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes, below. GENERAL INDEX Ardnagashel Estate, 171 Bank of Ireland The Ards Peninsula, 420 Dublin, 48–49 Abbey (Dublin), 74 Arigna Mining Experience, Galway, 271 Abbeyfield Equestrian and 305–306 Bantry, 227–229 Outdoor Activity Centre Armagh City, 391–394 Bantry House and Garden, 229 (Kildare), 106 Armagh Observatory, 394 Barna Golf Club, 272 Accommodations. See also Armagh Planetarium, 394 Barracka Books & CAZ Worker’s Accommodations Index Armagh’s Public Library, 391 Co-op (Cork City), 209–210 saving money on, 472–476 Ar mBréacha-The House of Beach Bar (Aughris), 333 Achill Archaeological Field Storytelling (Wexford), Beaghmore Stone Circles, 446 School, 323 128–129 The Beara Peninsula, 230–231 Achill Island, 320, 321–323 The arts, 8–9 Beara Way, 230 Adare, 255–256 Ashdoonan Falls, 351 Beech Hedge Maze, 94 Adrigole Arts, 231 Ashford Castle (Cong), 312–313 Belfast, 359–395 Aer Lingus, 15 Ashford House, 97 accommodations, 362–368 Agadhoe, 185 A Store is Born (Dublin), 72 active pursuits, 384 Aillwee Cave, 248 Athlone, 293–299 brief description of, 4 Aircoach, 16 Athlone Castle, 296 gay and lesbian scene, 390 Airfield Trust (Dublin), 62 Athy, 102–104 getting around, 362 Air travel, 461–468 Athy Heritage Centre, 104 history of, 360–361 Albert Memorial Clock Tower Atlantic Coast Holiday Homes layout of, 361 (Belfast), 377 (Westport), 314 nightlife, 386–390 Allihies, 230 Aughnanure Castle (near the other side of, 381–384 All That Glitters (Thomastown),
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Papers Published
    INDEX OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL PAPERS PUBLISHED IN 1907 [BEING THE SEVENTEENTH ISSUE OF THE SERIES AND COMPLETING THE INDEX FOR THE PERIOD 1891-1907] COMPILED BY BERNARD GOMME PUBLISHED BY ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE & COMPANY LTD 10, ORANGE STREET, LEICESTER SQUARE, W.C. UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE CONGRESS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETIES IN UNION WITH THE SOCIETY OF ANTIQUARIES 1908 CONTENTS [Those Transactions for the first time included in the index are marked with an asterisk,* the others are continuations from the indexes of 1891-190G. Transactions included for the first time are indexed from 1891 onwards.} Anthropological Institute, Journal, vol. xxxvii. Antiquaries, Ireland, Proceedings of Royal Society, vol. xxxvii. Antiquaries, London, Proceedings of Royal Society, 2nd S. vol. xxi. pt. 2. Antiquaries, Newcastle, Procceedings of Society, vol. x., 3rd S. vol. ii. Antiquaries, Scotland, Proceedings of Society, vol. xli. Archaoologia ^Eliana, 3rd S. vol. iii. Archssologia Cambrensis, 6th S. vol. vii. Archaeological Institute, Journal, vol. Ixiv. Berks, Bucks and Oxfordshire Archaeological Journal, vols. xii. (p. 97 to end), xiii. Biblical Archsoology, Society of, Proceedings, vol. xxix. Birmingham and Midland Institute, Transactions, vol. xxxii. Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, Transactions, vols. xxix. pt. 2, xxx. pt. 1 (to p. 179). British Academy, Proceedings, 1905 and 1900. British Archieological Association, Journal, N.S. vol. xiii. British Architects, Royal Institute of, Journal, 3rd S. vol. xiv. British Numismatic Journal, 1st S. vol. iii. British School at Athens, Annual, vol. xii. British School at Rome, Papers, vol. iv. Buckinghamshire Architectural and Archaeological Society, Records, vol. ix. pt. 4 (to p. 324). Cambridge Antiquarian Society, Transactions, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • CSG Bibliog 24
    CASTLE STUDIES: RECENT PUBLICATIONS – 29 (2016) By Dr Gillian Scott with the assistance of Dr John R. Kenyon Introduction Hello and welcome to the latest edition of the CSG annual bibliography, this year containing over 150 references to keep us all busy. I must apologise for the delay in getting the bibliography to members. This volume covers publications up to mid- August of this year and is for the most part written as if to be published last year. Next year’s bibliography (No.30 2017) is already up and running. I seem to have come across several papers this year that could be viewed as on the periphery of our area of interest. For example the papers in the latest Ulster Journal of Archaeology on the forts of the Nine Years War, the various papers in the special edition of Architectural Heritage and Eric Johnson’s paper on moated sites in Medieval Archaeology. I have listed most of these even if inclusion stretches the definition of ‘Castle’ somewhat. It’s a hard thing to define anyway and I’m sure most of you will be interested in these papers. I apologise if you find my decisions regarding inclusion and non-inclusion a bit haphazard, particularly when it comes to the 17th century and so-called ‘Palace’ and ‘Fort’ sites. If these are your particular area of interest you might think that I have missed some items. If so, do let me know. In a similar vein I was contacted this year by Bruce Coplestone-Crow regarding several of his papers over the last few years that haven’t been included in the bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Management of Tourist Attractions in Ireland: the Development of a Generic Sustainable Management Checklist
    SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT OF TOURIST ATTRACTIONS IN IRELAND: THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GENERIC SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT CHECKLIST By Caroline Gildea Supervised by Dr. James Hanrahan A dissertation submitted to the School of Business and Humanities, Institute of Technology, Sligo in fulfilment of the requirements of a Master of Arts (Research) June 2012 1 Declaration Declaration of ownership: I declare that this thesis is all my own work and that all sources used have been acknowledged. Signed: Date: 2 Abstract This thesis centres on the analysis of the sustainable management of visitor attractions in Ireland and the development of a tool to aid attraction managers to becoming sustainable tourism businesses. Attractions can be the focal point of a destination and it is important that they are sustainably managed to maintain future business. Fáilte Ireland has written an overview of the attractions sector in Ireland and discussed how they would drive best practice in the sector. However, there have still not been any sustainable management guidelines from Fáilte Ireland for tourist attractions in Ireland. The principal aims of this research was to assess tourism attractions in terms of water, energy, waste/recycling, monitoring, training, transportation, biodiversity, social/cultural sustainable management and economic sustainable management. A sustainable management checklist was then developed to aid attraction managers to sustainability within their attractions, thus saving money and the environment. Findings from this research concluded that tourism attractions in Ireland are not sustainably managed and there are no guidelines, training or funding in place to support these attraction managers in the transition to sustainability. Managers of attractions are not aware or knowledgeable enough in the area of sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Behind the Scenes
    ©Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd 689 Behind the Scenes SEND US YOUR FEEDBACK We love to hear from travellers – your comments keep us on our toes and help make our books better. Our well-travelled team reads every word on what you loved or loathed about this book. Although we cannot reply individually to your submissions, we always guarantee that your feedback goes straight to the appropriate authors, in time for the next edition. Each person who sends us information is thanked in the next edition – the most useful submissions are rewarded with a selection of digital PDF chapters. Visit lonelyplanet.com/contact to submit your updates and suggestions or to ask for help. Our award-winning website also features inspirational travel stories, news and discussions. Note: We may edit, reproduce and incorporate your comments in Lonely Planet products such as guidebooks, websites and digital products, so let us know if you don’t want your comments reproduced or your name acknowledged. For a copy of our privacy policy visit lonelyplanet.com/ privacy. Anthony Sheehy, Mike at the Hunt Museum, OUR READERS Steve Whitfield, Stevie Winder, Ann in Galway, Many thanks to the travellers who used the anonymous farmer who pointed the way to the last edition and wrote to us with help- Knockgraffon Motte and all the truly delightful ful hints, useful advice and interesting people I met on the road who brought sunshine anecdotes: to the wettest of Irish days. Thanks also, as A Andrzej Januszewski, Annelise Bak C Chris always, to Daisy, Tim and Emma. Keegan, Colin Saunderson, Courtney Shucker D Denis O’Sullivan J Jack Clancy, Jacob Catherine Le Nevez Harris, Jane Barrett, Joe O’Brien, John Devitt, Sláinte first and foremost to Julian, and to Joyce Taylor, Juliette Tirard-Collet K Karen all of the locals, fellow travellers and tourism Boss, Katrin Riegelnegg L Laura Teece, Lavin professionals en route for insights, information Graviss, Luc Tétreault M Marguerite Harber, and great craic.
    [Show full text]
  • 1:Introduction Westmeath Tourism Strategy 2021 to 2027
    The Consultation Process Westmeath Tourism Strategy 2021 to 2027 It’s important that the new Strategy fully reflects and responds to the range of PUBLIC CONSULTATION opportunities and challenges for our county. This is the first of 5 ‘Issues Boards’, aimed Lough at setting the context and framework for a Sheelin comprehensive public consultation process: 1: Introduction MULLAGHMEEN 1:Introduction FORESTXT Context for the new Strategy LOUGH CREW 2: CAIRNS Athlone and Ireland’s Hidden Heartlands R396 3: TULLYNALLY Mullingar and Ireland’s Ancient East Westmeath County Council are preparing a new CASTLE GARDENS R195 4: Castlepollard FORE ABABBEBEY Developing and Marketing Immersive Lough Lough Lene Tourism Strategy, which will guide and inform tourism Derravaragh 5: Visitor Experiences R395 development in County Westmeath from 2021-2027. N4 R394- We are now inviting members of the public to N51 make submissions and proposals which will N52 help to shape the new Tourism Strategy. We Royal Canal Gre en Lough Tourism is an important indigenous industry, its benefits influencing many CENTRE PARCS w Owel LONGFORD FOREST a are also engaging with stakeholders, including y MULLINGAR different sectors across the wider economy. With considerable heritage and R393 CATHEDRTHEDRAALL agencies such as Fáilte Ireland and Waterways cultural assets, a scenic and rich natural environment, vibrant towns and R392 Lough R156 Ireland, industry representatives and relevant Ree N55 villages and an easily accessible location, Westmeath has enormous potential yal Canal Greenw ATHLONE Ro ay interest groups. CASTLE HILL OF to benefit from tourism. UISNEACH To Dublin R391 R148 Unfortunately we can’t conduct face-to-face Lough M4 R390 Ennell Development and enhancement of our visitor offering has accelerated in To Galway consultations at the moment, but should you DÚN NA SÍ AMENITY AND nway R400 recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Ireland and the Anglo-Norman Church : A
    Cornell University Library BR794.S87 A5 1892 Ireland and the Anglo-Norman church : a 3 1924 029 246 829 olln B9, SB7 AS IRELAND AND THE ANGLO-NORMAN CHURCH, §g % aawi ^ai^at. THE ACTS OF THK APOSTLES. VoL I. Crown BvOf cloth, price ys. 6cl. A volume of the Third Series of the Expositor's Bible. IRELAND AND THE CELTIC CHURCH. A History of Ireland from St. Patrick to the English Conquest in 1172. Second Edition, Crown Zvo, chth, price gs. "Any one who can make the dry bones of ancient Irish history live again may feel sure of finding- an audience sympathetic, intelligent, and ever-growing. Dr. Stokes has this faculty in a high degree. This book will be a boon to that large and growing number of persons who desire to have a trustworthy account of the beginning of Irish history, and cannot study it for themselves in the great but often dull works of the original investigators. It collects the scattered and often apparently insignificant results of original workers in this field, interprets them for us, and brings them into relation with the broader and better-known facts of European history."— Westminster Review. " London : Hodder & Stoughton, 27, Paternoster Row, IRELAND AND THE ANGLO-NORMAN CHURCH. S iM0rg 0f ^xilmii rair ^mlg Cj^mfewrtg from tlgi ^nQla- REV. G. T. STOKES, D.D., Professor of Ecclesiastical History in the University of Dublin j Keeper of St/ Sepulchre's Public Library, commonly called Archbishop Marsh's Library ; and Vicar of All Saints', Blackrock. SECOND EDITION. HODDER AND STOUGHTON, 27, PATERNOSTER ROW, MDCCCXCII.
    [Show full text]
  • The Castle Studies Group Bulletin
    THE CASTLE STUDIES GROUP BULLETIN Volume 15 April 2013 Editorial INSIDE THIS ISSUE ost of you will have received this Castle Studies Group Bulletin as an elec- News Europe/World Mtronic document, e-mailed to you as a pdf as part of your CSG membership. 2-3 You will notice some design changes over the previous printed versions which are intended to provide easy on-screen reading whist permitting printing to News Scotland be done when required. I would welcome any comments and suggestions from 4-6 members on the e-bulletin, especially ideas for how it might be improved. The intention is to provide the CSG Bulletin twice a year, in April and Conference Report September, to enable more timely news items and announcements to be made. Lincolnshire Castles This is of course subject to sufficient content being available for each edition 6-8 and to this end I would appeal to members to let me have any castle related news items, announcements and in particular any short articles or comments Colchester Castle for inclusion. Study Day For members without computer access who are reading this as a black 8-9 & white photocopy, it was suggested at the recent CSG AGM in Stirling that e- mail addresses of relatives or friends could be supplied who would be willing to Castle Studies Trust receive the e-bulletin on behalf of such members. Whilst there is no obligation 10 whatsoever to do this, it is an option and any member wishing to provide an alternative address for this purpose should send the details to David Bartlett, News England CSG Membership Secretary at [email protected] 11 Thanks to the contributors of this edition for their efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Description Shannon River Basin
    Case Study Description Shannon River Basin T. K. Mc Carthy & Marcin Blaszkowski Department of Zoology, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland Telephone: +353-(0)91-512008 Fax: +353-(0)91-750526 [email protected] [email protected] 1 Introduction The River Shannon, Ireland’s largest river system, has a network of lakes in which European eel is an important natural component of the fish assemblages. Like many other European rivers, the hydrological features of the River Shannon have been altered during development of navigation routes, by weirs constructed for flood control and when it was harnessed for hydroelectricity generation (Cullen, 2002). These and other environmental changes are reflected in the history of its eel fisheries and have stimulated a series of research activities that are ongoing (Moriarty, 1982, McCarthy et al., 1999, McCarthy & Cullen, 2000 a, 2000 b, 2002, Cullen & McCarthy, 2000, 2002, 2003, Arai et al., 2006) The Shannon river basin district (Fig 1), defined with respect to the objectives of Water Framework Directive, includes an area of about 18,000 km2 , mostly in the lowland central area of the Republic of Ireland but with a small part (6km2) of the upper River Shannon basin extending across the border to Northern Ireland. It includes areas referable to Ecoregion 17 (rivers, lakes) and Ecoregion 1 (transitional and coastal waters). It has been estimated that there are more than 1,600 lakes, totalling about 440km2 surface areas, though the majority are less than 0.5km2, and about 16,000 km of river channel in the river basin district.
    [Show full text]
  • NPWS (2012) Lower River Shannon SAC (Site Code: 2165)
    NPWS (2012) Lower River Shannon SAC (site code: 2165) Conservation objectives supporting document- marine habitats and species Version 1 March 2012 Introduction The Lower River Shannon SAC is designated for the Annex I qualifying interests of Large shallow inlets and bays (EU habitat code 1160), Estuaries (1130), Mudflats and sandflats not covered by seawater at low tide (1140), Sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water all the time (1110) and Reefs (1170) (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) and the Annex II species Tursiops truncatus (common bottlenose dolphin, also known as bottlenose dolphin or bottle-nosed dolphin). The Annex I habitat shallow inlets and bays is a large physiographic feature that may wholly or partly incorporate other Annex I habitats including reefs, sandbanks and mudflats and sandflats within its area. This is also the case for estuaries, which may wholly or partly incorporate other Annex I habitats including reefs and mudflats and sandflats within its area. A survey of the Ballybunnion and the Turbot Banks was carried out in 2007 (Aquafact, 2007). Intertidal and subtidal surveys were undertaken in 2010 to investigate the physical and biological structure of marine communities within this SAC and the overlapping areas that are contained within the two Special Protection Areas (SPAs), i.e. Loop Head SPA (site code 4119) and River Shannon and River Fergus Estuaries SPA (4077) (Aquafact, 2011a, 2011b and 2011c). Following initial investigations of a bottlenose dolphin community occurring in the Shannon Estuary (Berrow et al., 1996), surveys of the size, structure and distribution of the population inhabiting the Lower River Shannon SAC have been conducted over several years since the mid-1990’s (Ingram, 2000; Rogan et al., 2000; Ingram and Rogan, 2002; Ingram and Rogan, 2003; Rogan et al., 2003; Englund et al., 2007; Englund et al., 2008; Berrow, 2009; Berrow et al., 2010; Foley et al., 2010; Mirimin et al., 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Sheela-Na-Gigs: Unravelling an Enigma
    SHEELA-NA-GIGS An air of mystery has surrounded the crude carvings of naked females, called Sheela-na-gigs, since their scholarly discovery some one hundred and sixty years ago. Especially puzzling is the fact that they occur predominantly in medieval religious buildings. High-minded clergymen have since defaced or destroyed many of these carvings, and for a long time archaeologists dismissed them as rude and repulsive. Only in the less puritanical atmosphere of the past few decades have academics and artists turned their interest to Sheela-na-gigs. Divergent views emerged: some see them as ancient goddesses, some as vestiges of a pagan cult, others as protective talismans or Christian warnings against lust. Here Barbara Freitag examines all the literature on the subject, highlighting the inconsistencies of the various interpretations with regard to origin, function and name. By considering the Sheela-na-gigs in their medieval social context, she suggests that they were folk deities with particular responsibility for assistance in childbirth. This fascinating survey sheds new light on this controversial phenomenon, and also contains a complete catalogue of all known carvings, including hitherto unrecorded or unpublished figures. It is the most comprehensive study of Sheela-na-gigs yet published. Barbara Freitag is Lecturer in Intercultural Studies at Dublin City University, Ireland. SHEELA-NA-GIGS Unravelling an enigma Barbara Freitag LONDON AND NEW YORK First published 2004 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Parkes, M.A. & Wyse Jackson, P.N. 1998
    A SURVEY ON THE STATE AND STATUS OF GEOLOGICAL COLLECTIONS IN MUSEUMS AND PRIVATE COLLECTIONS IN THE WPUBLIC OF IRELAND. by Matthew A. Parkes and Patrick N. Wyse Jackson Parkes, M.A. & Wyse Jackson, P.N. 1998. A survey on the state and status of geological collections in museums and private collections in the Republic of Ireland. The Geological Curator 6(10): 377-388. A simple postal survey of 73 museums, heritagecentres,individualsandotherestablishments was conducted to assess the state and status of geological collections across the Republic of Ireland. There were 31 locations with a collection, assessed under three categories: 1) educational or institutional geological department, 2) County MuseumILocal authority funded museum and 3) other collections including private ones. Excepting the National Museum, the specialised geological museums were mainly directed towards internal functions, with little outreach or community emphasis, and with a resource based lack of curatorial strength. Thecounty Museums hadlittleknowledgeor practical conccrn fortheir geological collections, but a desirc for assistance was clear. With thc othcr collections the lack of appropriate knowledge to asscss or use the geological collcctions was apparent. All but the specialised geological muscums commonly confused archaeological specimens wilh geological ones and this misapprehension is evidently widely hcld. Some preliminary recommendations for improving thc status of geological collcctions are suggested. Matrl~ewPn~kes, Geoscnpes, 3 Fo'onleno),Sireel, Dublin 7, Ireland nnrl Patrick N. Wjrre Jackson, Deljar-t,ner~tofGeologj',Trirtily College, Dubli112,h-elrrnrl. Received28rl1Augu.s~ 1998; >-eviserlvep-siorz r-eceived 20111 Seple~:~ber1998. Introduction any collectio~~has beenincluded, irrespectiveof whether the establishment where it was held would pass any As geological curators, we had been aware of ageneral particular definition of a museum.
    [Show full text]