Mid-West 2 Detailed Flora, Fauna, Native Vegetation & Net Gain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mid-West 2 Detailed Flora, Fauna, Native Vegetation & Net Gain MID-WEST 2 MURRAY RIVER CROSSING AT ECHUCA–MOAMA DETAILED FLORA, FAUNA, NATIVE VEGETATION AND NET GAIN ASSESSMENT VicRoads 25 Burwood Road, Hawthorn, Vic. 3122 P.O. Box 74, Richmond, Vic. 3121 Ph. (03) 9815 2111 Fax. (03) 9815 2685 April 2013 Report No. 8194 (3.8) Mid-West 2 Murray River Crossing –Flora, Fauna and Native Vegetation Assessment Report No. 8194 (3.8) CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 8 3. EXISTING INFORMATION ................................................................................................ 11 3.1. National level.......................................................................................................... 11 3.2. State level ............................................................................................................... 11 3.2.1. Victorian portion of the study area ............................................................... 11 3.2.2. NSW portion of the study area ...................................................................... 12 4. FIELD METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................... 13 4.1. General methods ................................................................................................... 13 4.1.1. Initial Flora and Fauna Field Survey ............................................................. 13 4.1.2. Targeted Flora and Fauna Surveys ............................................................... 18 4.2. Limitations of field assessments .......................................................................... 25 5. SITE DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 26 5.1. Study Area .............................................................................................................. 26 5.2. Wildlife Connectivity ............................................................................................... 26 5.3. Description of vegetation in Victoria ..................................................................... 27 5.4. Description of vegetation in New South Wales .................................................... 29 5.5. Description of aquatic habitat ............................................................................... 31 5.5.1. Victorian component of the study area ........................................................ 31 5.5.2. NSW component of the study area ............................................................... 32 6. ASSESSMENT RESULTS ................................................................................................. 38 6.1. Flora and Vegetation assessment ........................................................................ 38 6.1.1. Native Vegetation ........................................................................................... 38 6.1.1.1. Native Vegetation in Victoria ..................................................................... 38 6.1.1.2. Native Vegetation in New South Wales .................................................... 44 6.1.2. Flora ................................................................................................................ 53 6.1.2.1. Threatened flora species ........................................................................... 53 6.1.3. Threatened ecological communities ............................................................. 55 6.2. Fauna ...................................................................................................................... 58 6.2.1. Habitat assessment ....................................................................................... 58 6.2.2. Fauna species ................................................................................................ 61 6.2.3. Listed threatened fauna species .................................................................. 61 Page | i Mid-West 2 Murray River Crossing –Flora, Fauna and Native Vegetation Assessment Report No. 8194 (3.8) 6.2.4. Endangered Ecological Communities ........................................................... 71 6.2.5. Threatened Species targeted Surveys .......................................................... 71 6.2.6. Results of the Bat Survey .............................................................................. 84 6.2.6.1. Results of the First Bat Survey .................................................................. 84 6.2.6.2. Results of the Second Bat Survey............................................................. 88 6.2.6.3. Results for threatened bats recorded within the study area .................. 91 7. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DETAILS AND IMPACTS ................................................... 93 7.1. Project Background ................................................................................................ 93 7.2. Project Development Details ................................................................................. 93 7.3. Design Response and Recommendations ........................................................... 94 7.4. Project Development Impacts ............................................................................... 96 7.4.1. Impacts to native vegetation ......................................................................... 96 7.4.2. Impacts to habitat for fauna ......................................................................... 96 7.4.3. Potential impacts ........................................................................................... 97 7.4.4. Alignment Rating Comparison ....................................................................... 99 8. COMMONWEALTH IMPACTS AND REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS .............................. 103 8.1. EPBC Act ............................................................................................................... 103 8.1.1. Threatened ecological communities ........................................................... 103 8.1.2. Threatened flora species ............................................................................. 103 8.1.3. Threatened fauna species ........................................................................... 103 8.1.4. Migratory bird species ................................................................................. 104 8.1.5. Key Threatening Processes under the EPBC Act ....................................... 104 8.1.6. Implications .................................................................................................. 104 9. VICTORIAN IMPACTS AND REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS ........................................... 105 9.1. Planning controls ................................................................................................. 105 9.1.1. State provisions ........................................................................................... 105 9.1.2. Local provisions ........................................................................................... 105 9.2. Native Vegetation Management Framework ..................................................... 105 9.2.1. How the Framework operates ..................................................................... 105 9.2.2. Offset targets for removal from habitat zones ........................................... 107 9.2.3. Offset targets for removal of scattered trees ............................................. 111 9.3. FFG Act .................................................................................................................. 112 Page | ii Mid-West 2 Murray River Crossing –Flora, Fauna and Native Vegetation Assessment Report No. 8194 (3.8) 9.3.1. Threatened ecological communities ........................................................... 112 9.3.2. Threatened/protected flora species ........................................................... 112 9.3.3. Threatened fauna species ........................................................................... 113 9.3.4. Key Threatening Processes under the FFG Act .......................................... 114 9.3.5. Implications .................................................................................................. 114 9.4. EE Act .................................................................................................................... 115 9.5. DSE advisory lists ................................................................................................. 115 10. NEW SOUTH WALES IMPACTS & REGULATORY IMPLICATIONS ............................ 117 10.1. Planning Controls ............................................................................................. 117 10.1.1. State Environmental Planning Policy (Infrastructure) 2007 ................. 117 10.1.2. State Environmental Planning Policy No. 44 (Koala Habitat) ............... 117 10.1.3. Other State Environmental Planning Policy............................................ 118 10.2. Native Vegetation Act 2003 ............................................................................ 118 10.3. Fisheries Management Act 1994 ................................................................... 118 10.3.1. Threatened fish species .......................................................................... 118 10.3.2. Endangered ecological community ........................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sun Country Official Visitor Guide
    OFFICIAL VISITOR GUIDE Sun Country on the Murray Yarrawonga Mulwala, Cobram Barooga, Numurkah, Nathalia, Barmah and more. Yarrawonga Mulwala Cobram Barooga NumurkahNathalia Barmah Here in Sun Country on the Murray, you’ll find a friendly welcome around every bend. 4 Connect with Us 5 Welcome 6 Arts & Heritage 7 Explore the Land 8 Events 9 Markets 10 Food & Wine 12 Golf 13 On the Water 14 Accommodation 15 Caravan the Sun Country 16 Sun Country on the Murray Regional Map 18 Yarrawonga Mulwala 20 Cobram Barooga 22 Numurkah 24 Nathalia 26 Barmah 28 Local Villages 30 Murray Regional Touring Route 32 Visitor Information Centre contact details Here in Sun Country on the Murray, you’ll find a friendly welcome around every bend. 3 Connect with Us @visitsuncountry #visitsuncountry Share your photos with us for a chance to receive random giveaways and allow us to feature your photos. 4 Welcome Enjoy the best the Murray has to the river, savour delicious produce offer, exploring the waterways, straight from the farm gate and visit towns and natural attractions nearby villages of Barmah, Berrigan, between Bundalong and Barmah. Finley, Nathalia and Numurkah – all Drenched in sunshine year-round, part of this beautiful region. you’ll soon see why we’re keen Sun Country on the Murray has a to share our ‘Sun Country on the relaxed yet contemporary atmosphere, Murray’. where watersports, fishing, golf, locally The twin towns of Yarrawonga grown produce, tourist attractions, Mulwala sit idyllically on either side of well-appointed accommodation, the Murray River, with Lake Mulwala great shopping and sophisticated adding to the mesmerising backdrop restaurants are all on offer.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulupna Island - Australia Day 2013
    MARCH 2013 Ulupna Island - Australia Day 2013 Official Newsletter of the Victorian Four Wheel Drive Club Inc Registration No A0002184F Page 2 of 18 Notice Board VFWDC GENERAL MEETING VENUE The club meets at the Bowling Club Rooms, Noble Park Football Club, 46-56 Moodemere St, Noble Park on the 1st Wednesday of every month at 8.00pm (No meeting in January and November meeting at selected location). Members and Guests are welcome to dine at the Bistro before attending the meeting. First WEDNESDAY of each month 8.00PM Start Venue: Bowling Club Rooms (Next to Car Park, down the far end of the car park) Noble Park Football Club 46-56 Moodemere Street Noble Park Melways ref: 89 D4 FREE WHEELING Hello and welcome to the March newsletter. This month see’s two long weekends and Easter coming around early, so check out some of the trips in the calendar and put your name down on the trip data forms. Catherine [email protected] Official Newsletter of the Victorian Four Wheel Drive Club Inc Registration No A0002184F Page 3 of 18 COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT 2012-2013 President Mark Felton [email protected] Vice President Catherine Felton [email protected] VFWDC Treasurer Steve Pitcher [email protected] ADVERTISING Secretary Andre Van Derwalt [email protected] GENERAL COMMITTEE DIRECTORY Assistant Secretary [email protected] Trip Co-ordinator David Bruinsma [email protected] BUSH-B-Q Newsletter Editor Catherine Felton [email protected] Manufacturer of the Barbeque of the Outback Web Manager Bruce Cremonesi [email protected] Don & Thelma Montague Ph: 9808 1200
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Barmah-Millewa Forest
    Management Plan for Yorta Yorta Cultural Environmental Heritage Project Final Report Yorta Yorta Clans Group Inc. 11 January, 2003 All matters relating to the plan and its contents should be directed to the Yorta Yorta Clans Group as the appropriate corporate body that represents the Yorta Yorta people on all land, water and heritage matters pertaining to their traditional lands-see map attached: Figure 1. 2 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 6 2 METHODS 9 2.1 Terms of reference for study 9 2.2 Methodology 9 2.2.1 Cultural heritage methodology 9 2.2.2 Environmental heritage methodology 10 2.3 Identification of significant places and sites 10 3 BACKGROUND 14 3.1 Who are the Yorta Yorta? 14 3.2 Background of Yorta Yorta occupation 14 3.3 Native title claim 15 4 HERITAGE VALUES 17 4.1 Environmental heritage 17 4.1.1 Geomorphology 17 4.1.2 environmental variations 19 4.1.3 native vegetation 21 4.1.4 fauna 22 4.2 Natural and cultural heritage 25 4.2.1 Ethnographic sketch 25 4.2.1.1 social organisation 25 4.2.1.2 settlement 26 4.2.1.3 subsistence strategy and technology 27 4.2.1.4 plant procurement and processing 30 4.2.1.5 use of fire 32 4.2.1.6 exchange 32 4.2.1.7 ceremonial behabviour 33 4.2.1.8 mortuary behaviour 33 4.3 Archaeological heritage 34 4.3.1 human remains and their place in the landscape 34 4.3.2 settlement patterns 35 4.3.3 site inventory 37 4.4 Places of significance 39 4.4.1 places listed on the Register of the National Estate 39 4.4.2 Ramsar listed places 41 4.4.3 Heritage Rivers 41 4.4.4 Key regions 42 4.4.5 Additional cultural sites of special significance to the Yorta Yorta 43 5 THREATS TO YORTA YORTA ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE 48 5.1 Overview of issues 48 5.2 Changes in water regime 49 5.3 Grazing by domestic stock 50 5.4 Timber harvesting 51 3 5.5 Destruction of cultural sites 52 6 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROTECTION OF OUR HERITAGE 53 6.1 General management structure proposed for the protection of Yorta Yorta natural and cultural heritage 53 61.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 31, Nov 2008
    The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 31, Nov 2008 The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter Number 39 November 2012 ABS Website: http://abs.ausbats.org.au ABS Discussion list - email: [email protected] ISSN 1448-5877 © Copyright The Australasian Bat Society, Inc. (2012) The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 31, Nov 2008 The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter, Number 39, November 2012 – Instructions for Contributors – The Australasian Bat Society Newsletter will accept contributions under one of the following two sections: Research Papers, and all other articles or notes. There are two deadlines each year: 10th March for the April issue, and 10th October for the November issue. The Editor reserves the right to hold over contributions for subsequent issues of the Newsletter, and meeting the deadline is not a guarantee of immediate publication. Opinions expressed in contributions to the Newsletter are the responsibility of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Australasian Bat Society, its Executive or members. For consistency, the following guidelines should be followed: Emailed electronic copy of manuscripts or articles, sent as an attachment, is the preferred method of submission. Faxed and hard copy manuscripts will be accepted but reluctantly! Please send all submissions to the Newsletter Editor at the email or postal address below. Electronic copy should be in 11 point Arial font, left and right justified with 16 mm left and right margins. Please use Microsoft Word; any version is acceptable. Manuscripts should be submitted in clear, concise English and free from typographical and spelling errors. Please leave two spaces after each sentence.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants Will Be Assessed on Their Knowledge of Bats, With
    Chiropterology Division BC Arizona Trial Event 1. DESCRIPTION: Participants will be assessed on their knowledge of bats, with an emphasis on North American Bats, South American Microbats, and African MegaBats. A TEAM OF UP TO: 2 APPROXIMATE TIME: 50 minutes 2. EVENT PARAMETERS: a. Each team may bring one 2” or smaller three-ring binder, as measured by the interior diameter of the rings, containing information in any form and from any source. Sheet protectors, lamination, tabs and labels are permitted in the binder. b. If the event features a rotation through a series of stations where the participants interact with samples, specimens or displays; no material may be removed from the binder throughout the event. c. In addition to the binder, each team may bring one unmodified and unannotated copy of either the National Bat List or an Official State Bat list which does not have to be secured in the binder. 3. THE COMPETITION: a. The competition may be run as timed stations and/or as timed slides/PowerPoint presentation. b. Specimens/Pictures will be lettered or numbered at each station. The event may include preserved specimens, skeletal material, and slides or pictures of specimens. c. Each team will be given an answer sheet on which they will record answers to each question. d. No more than 50% of the competition will require giving common or scientific names. e. Participants should be able to do a basic identification to the level indicated on the Official List. States may have a modified or regional list. See your state website.
    [Show full text]
  • Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan
    Barmah Forest Ramsar Site Strategic Management Plan Department of Sustainability and Environment Parks Victoria developed this Strategic Management Plan in conjunction with the Department of Sustainability and Environment and key stakeholders, and coordinated the public comment process on the draft document. This report was prepared with financial support from the National Wetlands Program, under the Natural Heritage Trust. © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003 This publication is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced, copied, transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical or graphic) without the prior permission of the State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment. All requests and enquiries should be directed to the Copyright Officer, Library Information Services, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 5/250 Victoria Parade, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002. Disclaimers This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been made to ensure that the information in the report is accurate. The Department of Sustainability and Environment does not guarantee that the report is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence, which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. The views and opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the Commonwealth Government of Australia, the Federal Minister for Environment and Heritage, or the Department of the Environment and Heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Riparian Vegetation of the River Murray COVER: Healthy Red Gum in the Kex)Ndrook State Forest Near Barham N.S.W
    Riparian Vegetation of The River Murray COVER: Healthy red gum in the Kex)ndrook State Forest near Barham N.S.W. Background, black box silhouette. PHOTO: D. Eastburn ISBN 1 R75209 02 6 RIVER MURRAY RIPARIAN VEGET ION STUDY PREPARED FOR: MURRAY-DARLING BASIN COMMISSION BY: MARGULES AND PARTNERS PTY LTD PAND J SMITH ECOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION FORESTS AND LANDS VICTORIA January 1990 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The River Murray Riparian Vegetation Survey was initiated by the Murray­ Darling Basin Commission t9 assessJhe present status ofthe vegetationalong the Murray, to identify causes ofdegradation, and to develop solutions for its rehabilitation and long term stability. The study area was the floodplain of the Murray River and its anabranches, including the Edward-Wakool system, from below Hume Dam to the upper end of Lake Alexandrina. The components of the study were: · Literature Review A comprehensive bibliography was compiled on the floodplain vegeta­ tion, its environment and the impact ofman's activities. The literature was reviewed and summarised. · Floristic Survey A field survey was carried out, visiting 112 sites throughout the study area and collecting vegetation data from 335 plots. Data collected were the species present, their relative abundance, the condition of the eucalypts, the amount ofeucalypt regeneration and indices ofgrazing pressure. Brief studies were made of the effects of river regulation and salinisation at specific sites. Thirty-seven plant communities were identified from a numerical analyis ofthe floristic survey data. The differences reflect environmental changes both along the river and across the floodplain. The most important factors were identified as soil salinity levels and flooding frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • Timothy Wilson Roads and Maritime Services Level Ground 1 Simmons Street, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650
    P.O. Box 1088 Newport, Victoria 3015 Phone: 03 9391 4749 Mobile: 0414 689 853 Email: [email protected] ABN: 811 5163 3797 Timothy Wilson Roads and Maritime Services Level Ground 1 Simmons Street, Wagga Wagga NSW 2650 5/04/2015 RE: Echuca Bat Call Peer Review; Contract No. 15.2571.0265 Dear Timothy, As requested, I have undertaken a review of the bat sonograms that were attributed to Nyctophilus corbeni following the survey undertaken at the site of the proposed new Echuca - Moama Bridge. I am of the belief that the call parameter employed by Dr Greg Richards to identify Nyctophilus corbeni sonograms (minimum frequency of 35kHz) is not a reliable identification parameter. The reference calls of two species, being N. geoffroyi and N. gouldi (captured in the Echuca - Moama region) also display calls at a minimum frequency of 35kHz or lower. Six subject matter experts were consulted on whether individual Nyctophilus species could be identified from a specific call parameter. All six experts were of the opinion that with the current technology available for recording bat calls, it is not possible to identify Nyctophilus from their call alone. A review of the Victorian Biodiversity Atlas, BioNet Wildlife Atlas of NSW and Atlas of Living Australia provided historical records of N. corbeni. With the exception of the record submitted by Dr Richards to the BioNet Atlas of NSW, the next nearest individual records to the site are near Deniliquin in NSW (70km north of Echuca) and Mitiamo in Victoria (50km west of Echuca). A number of the subject matter experts with whom I consulted during the preparation of this review have extensive trapping experience in the Echuca – Moama region, and are yet to record N.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Joint Management Plan for Barmah National Park
    ! ! "#$%&!'()*&!+$*$,-+-*&!./$*! %(#!0$#+$1!*$&)(*$/!.$#2! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 3(#&$!3(#&$!&#$")&)(*$/!(4*-#! /$*"!+$*$,-+-*&!0($#"! 5678! ! Cover artwork Dixon Patten (Junior) Yorta Yorta ‘Home’ 2014 This art depicts the three rivers (our lifelines) that flow througH our beautiful Country! Campaspe, Goulburn and of course the MigHty Murray! The outstretcHed Hands are nurturing tHe land and I Have placed our beloved long-neck turtle (totem) close to the outstretched arms, also nurturing our wildlife. The various brown/white coloured circles represent the townsHips/communities that are present today along the river and surrounds. The orange circles depict traditional sacred/special sites for our men and women. The various (contoured lines) colours represent the bush/forests, sandHills, lakes and plains that you can find on Country. The three paths that wind, depict our individual journeys — for some of us, that journey has happened off Country, but the paths guide us ‘home’ for spiritual sustenance and replenisHment. The footprints are those of our old people who have walked this land for millenia, and wHose imprints we follow. DRAFT JOINT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR BARMAH NATIONAL PARK YORTA YORTA TRADITIONAL OWNER LAND MANAGEMENT BOARD 2019 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this document may contain images, names, quotes and other references to deceased people. YOU ARE INVITED TO MAKE A SUBMISSION ON THIS DRAFT PLAN This Draft Joint Management Plan for Barmah National Park is
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks
    National Parks Act Annual Report 2009 Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne October 2009 © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment 2009 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 . Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne 3002 Printed by Stream Solutions Printed on 100% recycled paper ISSN 1031-7899 For further information, contact the DSE Customer Service Centre on 136 186 or the Parks Victoria Information Centre on 13 1963. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an accessible format, such as large print or audio, please telephone 136 186 or 1800 122 969 (TTY), or email [email protected]. This document is also available in PDF format on the Internet at <www.dse.vic.gov.au>. Notes UÊ i}Ã>ÌÊÀiviÀÀi`ÊÌÊÊÌ iÊÀi«ÀÌÊÃÊ6VÌÀ>Êi}Ã>Ì° UÊ The Act means the National Parks Act 1975 unless otherwise implied. UÊ Minister means the Minister responsible for administering the National Parks Act 1975 . During the year, this was Gavin Jennings ]ÊÃÌiÀÊvÀÊ ÛÀiÌÊ>`Ê >ÌiÊ >}i° UÊ Secretary means the Secretary to the Department of Sustainability and Environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Departmental Reply
    2010/13654 Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Australia Dear Sir/Madam, I am pleased to make this submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Conservation’s inquiry into the status, health and sustainability of Australia's koala population. The Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Populations and Communities is responsible for administering the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act), including the provisions relating to the listing of nationally threatened species. These provisions, including matters that can and cannot be taken into consideration in reaching a decision on eligibility for threatened species listing, are set out in Attachment A. The koala has been nominated for possible listing as a nationally threatened species. In making decisions to list nationally threatened species under the EPBC Act, the Minister for Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities must take into account the advice of the independent Threatened Species Scientific Committee. The Committee recently completed an assessment of the nomination to list the koala as a nationally threatened species under the EPBC Act. The Committee undertook a comprehensive assessment of the status of the national koala population, including an extensive literature review, an expert workshop, and public and expert submissions. The Committee’s guidelines for assessment of the national conservation and threat status of native species are set out at Attachment B. These are applied to threatened species nominations to determine if taxa are eligible for listing and, if so, in which category. The Committee concluded that the koala was not eligible for listing as nationally threatened but noted that reaching a conclusion was challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Barmah Forest: a Review of Its Values, Management Objectives, and Knowledge Base
    Barmah Forest: a review of its values, management objectives, and knowledge base Nick Abel1, Jane Roberts2, Julian Reid3, Ian Overton1, Deborah O’Connell1, Judith Harvey1, Sophie Bickford1 1 2 3 CSIRO Consultant CSIRO Visiting Fellow Report to the Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority May 2006 Barmah Forest Review May 2006 Enquiries should be addressed to: Nick Abel ph: 02 6242 1534 email [email protected] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems Important Notice The results and analyses contained in this Report are based on a number of technical, circumstantial or otherwise specified assumptions and parameters. The user must make its own assessment of the suitability for its use of the information or material contained in or generated from the Report. To the extent permitted by law, CSIRO excludes all liability to any party for expenses, losses, damages and costs arising directly or indirectly from using this Report. Use of this Report The use of this Report is subject to the terms on which it was prepared by CSIRO. The Report must not be used as a means of endorsement without the prior written consent of CSIRO. The name, trade mark or logo of CSIRO must not be used without the prior written consent of CSIRO. Page 1 Barmah Forest Review May 2006 Table of Contents TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ 7 TABLE OF TABLES.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]