DOCSLIB.ORG

Floods of May and June 2004 in Central and Eastern Ohio: FEMA Disaster Declaration 1519

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Floods of May and June 2004 in Central and Eastern Ohio: FEMA Disaster Declaration 1519 Floods of May and June 2004 in Central and Eastern Ohio: FEMA Disaster Declaration 1519 By Andrew D. Ebner, David E. Straub, and Jonathan D. Lageman In cooperation with the Ohio Emergency Management Agency Open-File Report 2008–1290 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ebner, A.D., Straub, D.E., and Lageman, J.D., 2008, Floods of May and June 2004 in central and eastern Ohio— FEMA Disaster Declaration 1519: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1290, 85 p. iii Contents Abstract ...........................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................1 Antecedent Climatic Conditions ..................................................................................................................3 May 18–25, 2004, Flood..................................................................................................................................3 Storms of May 17–23, 2004 ..................................................................................................................3 General Description of the May 18–25, 2004, Flood ........................................................................5 Areal Distribution .........................................................................................................................5 Flood Stages, Streamflows, and Recurrence Intervals .........................................................5 June 9, 2004, Flood .......................................................................................................................................18 Storms of June 9, 2004 .......................................................................................................................18 General Description of the June 9, 2004, Flood .............................................................................18 Areal Distribution .......................................................................................................................18 Flood Stages, Streamflows, and Recurrence Intervals .......................................................18 June 11–18, 2004, Flood...............................................................................................................................18 Storms of June 11–17, 2004 ...............................................................................................................22 General Description of the June 11–18, 2004, Flood .....................................................................22 Areal Distribution .......................................................................................................................22 Flood Stages, Streamflows, and Recurrence Intervals .......................................................29 Flood and Storm Damages Associated with FEMA-1519-DR ...............................................................29 Summary........................................................................................................................................................33 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................................................33 References Cited..........................................................................................................................................33 Appendix 1. Details of Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses ..............................................................35 1–A. West Fork Duck Creek near the Village of Belle Valley ...................................................36 1–B. Plum Creek near the City of Brunswick ..............................................................................37 1–C. West Branch Sunday Creek and West Branch Sunday Creek Tributary near the Village of Hemlock ..........................................................................................................38 1–D. East Branch Rocky River Tributary R9 near the City of North Royalton ........................39 1–E. Mud Brook Tributary 1C and Cuyahoga River Tributary 1A near the City of Stow .......40 Figures 1–15. Maps showing: 1. Ohio counties declared disaster areas under FEMA declaration 1519 ......................2 2. Regionally averaged monthly total precipitation and percentage of normal precipitation for the 10 climatic regions of Ohio for A, March and B, April 2004 .................................................................................................4 3. Isohyetal map of 7-day rainfall totals in Ohio for May 17–23, 2004 .............................6 4. Locations of selected U.S. Geological Survey streamgages that are referred to in this report .....................................................................................................8 iv 5. Selected areas of southeastern Ohio affected by flooding during May 18–25, 2004 .......................................................................................................10 6. Selected areas of eastern Ohio affected by flooding during May 18–25, 2004 .......................................................................................................11 7. Selected areas of northeastern Ohio affected by flooding during May 18–25, 2004 .......................................................................................................12 8. Selected areas of northern Ohio affected by flooding during May 18–25, 2004 .......................................................................................................13 9. Isohyetal map of 6-hour rainfall totals from 3:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on June 9, 2004 ..............................................................................................................19 10. Selected areas of northern Ohio affected by flooding on June 9, 2004 ..........21 11. Isohyetal map of 7-day rainfall totals in Ohio for June 11–17, 2004 .................23 12. Selected areas of eastern Ohio affected by flooding during June 11–17, 2004 ......................................................................................................25 13. Selected areas of north-central Ohio affected by flooding during June 11–17, 2004 ......................................................................................................26 14. Selected areas of southwestern, western, and central Ohio affected by flooding during June 11–17, 2004 .....................................................................27 15. Selected areas of east-central Ohio affected by flooding during June 11–17, 2004 ......................................................................................................28 1-A1–1-E1. Maps showing: 1–A1. Location of the West Fork Duck Creek study reach for the Village of Belle Valley, Ohio ................................................................................36 1–B1. Location of the Plum Creek study reach for the City of Brunswick, Ohio .........................................................................................................................37 1–C1. Location of the West Branch Sunday Creek and West Branch Sunday Creek Tributary study reaches for the Village of Hemlock, Ohio ..........................................................................................................................38 1–D1. Location of the East Branch Rocky River Tributary R9 study reach for the City of North Royalton, Ohio ...................................................................39 1–E1. Location of the Mud Brook Tributary 1C and Cuyahoga River Tributary 1A study reaches for the City of Stow, Ohio .....................................40 1–A2. Graph showing flood profiles for West Fork Duck Creek near the Village of Belle Valley for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year-recurrence-interval floods ..............53 1–A3. Photograph showing cross-section locations for flood profiles on West Fork Duck Creek near the Village of Belle Valley, Ohio ..........................................................54 1–B2. Graph showing flood profiles for Plum Creek near the City of Brunswick for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year-recurrence-interval floods....................................60 1–B3. Photograph showing cross-section locations for flood profiles on Plum Creek near the City of Brunswick, Ohio .......................................................................................61 1–C2. Graph showing flood profiles for West Branch Sunday Creek near the Village of Hemlock for the 10-, 50-, 100-, and 500-year-recurrence-interval floods
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio Under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Antidegradation Classifications Assigned to State and National Scenic Rivers in Ohio under Proposed Rules, March 25, 2002 March 25, 2002 prepared by Division of Surface Water Division of Surface Water, 122 South Front St., PO Box 1049, Columbus, Ohio 43215 (614) 644-2001 Introduction Federal Water Quality Standard (WQS) program regulations require that States adopt and use an antidegradation policy. The policy has two distinct purposes. First, an antidegradation policy must provide a systematic and reasoned decision making process to evaluate the need to lower water quality. Regulated activities should not lower water quality unless the need to do so is demonstrated based on technical, social and economic criteria. The second purpose of an antidegradation policy is to ensure that the State’s highest quality streams, rivers and lakes are preserved. This document deals with the latter aspect of the antidegradation policy. Section 6111.12(A)(2) of the Ohio Revised Code specifically requires that the Ohio EPA establish provisions “ensuring that waters of exceptional recreational and ecological value are maintained as high quality resources for future generations.” Table 1 explains the proposed classification system to accomplish this directive. The shaded categories denote the special higher resource quality categories. The proposed rule contains 157 stream segments classified as either State Resource Waters (SRW) or Superior High Quality Waters (SHQW). The approximate mileage in each classification is shown in Table 1. The total mileage in both classifications represents less than four percent of Ohio’s streams. Refer to “Methods and Documentation Used to Propose State Resource Water and Superior High Quality Water Classifications for Ohio’s Water Quality Standards” (Ohio EPA, 2002) for further information about the process used to develop the list of streams.
    [Show full text]
  • River of the Little Owls
    at Kenyon College Field Notes July 2014 Vol. 18 / No.3 July, August, September Before the State Route 229 that we know today, a wagon road followed the river between Mount Vernon and Gambier. This photo appeared in William Bodine’s 1891 “The Kenyon Book.” change the name back to the melodic original, which thankfully stuck.1 Though it makes for an interesting tale, thousands of years prior to the river’s naming a much larger regime of change led to its birth from a immense sheet of ice known as the Wisconsin glacier. Prior to its advance, the Ko- kosing River did not exist, nor the Ohio River. Instead, the great Teays River flowed from east to west through the center of the state. River of the Little Owls The Wisconsin glacier advanced 20,000 years ago over the Teays valley, scrap- ping, grinding and trapping all manner The State Scenic Kokosing River winds through the of earth and stone under its frozen heart of our community and colors our past with mass. As it receded, great volumes of melt water cut new river valleys, in- tales of ice, exploration, and survival. cluding the Kokosing’s. Boulders and The first of a two-part series, by Heather Doherty crushed rock were also released from the ice and deposited on the river’s edges. The Kokosing River runs through the that explores how the river connects us heart of Knox County and Mount to our past and touches us today. Fast-forward to 1890, and that glacial Vernon, and has long been central to debris becomes an important local com- life in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: the Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20)
    PENNSYLVANIA ARCHAEOLOGICAL DATA SYNTHESIS: The Beaver Creek Watershed (Watershed B of the Ohio River Subbasin 20) S.R. 0224, Section L02 State Street Bridge Replacement Project Mahoning Township, Lawrence County, Pennsylvania ER #1999-6092-073 Prepared for: Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Engineering District 11-0 45 Thomas Run Road Bridgeville, Pennsylvania 15017 Submitted by: A.D. Marble & Company 100 Gamma Drive Suite 203 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 July 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i List of Figures................................................................................................................................. ii List of Photographs........................................................................................................................ iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements..........................................................................................................................v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY........................................1 A. Introduction....................................................................................................................1 B. Project Setting................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Clean Ohio Trails Fund Recipients
    2 0 1 9 C l e a n O h i o T r a i l s F u n d A w a r d s County City/Village Applicant Project Total Project COTF Funding Proposal Costs Ashtabula Ashtabula County Pymatuning valley $2,124,982.00 $500,000.00 The Pymatuning Valley Greenway Trail Phase 1.1 is a Metroparks Greenway Trail 3.51 mile multi-use trail in southwestern Ashtabula County, which is the initial phase of a regionally significant trail that will connect Ashtabula County and the Western Reserve Greenway Trail to Jamestown, PA and Clarion, PA. The trail itself will be designed to be off-road, paved, 10-feet-wide. Clean Ohio Trails Fund assistance will fund the construction, design, and engineering phases of this project. Clinton City of Wilmington Clarksville Connection- $2,022,601.00 $500,000.00 This project will extend the Luther Warren Peace Path Phase I Trail 3.5 miles from the existing terminus at Nelson Avenue in the City of Wilmington to Beechgrove Road and Ogden Road in Union Township as the first step towards developing a trail to connect to the Little Miami Trail in Warren County. Clean Ohio Trails Fund assistance will fund the construction phase of this project. Columbiana Columbiana County Little Beaver Creek $156,596.00 $117,447.00 The project will allow for the construction of 3.1 miles of a Park District Greenway Trail-Lincoln combination of bike lanes and bike trail along State Route Street Connector 154, east of Lisbon, to an existing park and ride near State Route 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow Simulations of the Great Miami River Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio
    Hydrogeologic Setting and Ground-Water Flow Simulations of the Great Miami River Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio By Rodney A. Sheets Section 7 of Hydrogeologic Settings and Ground-Water Flow Simulations for Regional Studies of the Transport of Anthropogenic and Natural Contaminants to Public-Supply Wells—Studies Begun in 2001 Edited by Suzanne S. Paschke Professional Paper 1737–A U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, SECRETARY U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2007 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Sheets, R.A., 2007, Hydrogeologic setting and ground-water flow simulations of the Great Miami Basin Regional Study Area, Ohio, section 7 of Paschke, S.S., ed., THydrogeologic settings and ground-water flow simulations for regional studies of the transport of anthropogenic and natural contaminants to public-supply wells—studies begun in 2001: Reston, Va., U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1737–A, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • H:\TMDL\Projects\In Progress\Little Beaver Creek\Final for Usepa\Little
    State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Total Maximum Daily Loads for the Little Beaver Creek Watershed Final Report August 17, 2005 Bob Taft, Governor Joseph P. Koncelik, Director CONTENTS TABLES .............................................................................. ii FIGURES..............................................................................iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................. iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................... v 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 2.0 IDENTIFICATION OF WATERBODY, POLLUTANT OF CONCERN, POLLUTANT SOURCES, AND PRIORITY RANKING ................................................. 6 2.1 Identification of Waterbody and Description of the Watershed .............................. 6 2.2 Previous Studies ................................................................. 11 2.3 Pollutants of Concern............................................................. 11 2.4 Pollutant Sources ................................................................ 12 2.5 Priority Ranking ................................................................. 13 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS, NUMERIC WATER QUALITY TARGETS, AND EXISTING WATER QUALITY ............................... 14 3.1 Biocriteria...................................................................... 14 3.2 Numeric Water Quality Targets ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fish and Shellfish Program Newsletter – May 2019
    Fish and Shellfish Program NEWSLETTER May 2019 This issue of the Fish and Shellfish Program Newsletter generally focuses on PCBs. EPA 823-N-18-004 Recent Advisory News In This Issue 2019 Ohio Sport Fish Consumption Advisory Recent Advisory News .............. 1 In March 2019, the Ohio Department of Health (ODH), in cooperation with the Ohio EPA News ................................ 4 Environmental Protection Agency and the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, issued Other News ............................. 8 fish consumption advisories for sport fish caught in state waters. Recently Awarded Research ... 11 Fish for Your Health: Overall Advice on Fish Consumption Tech and Tools ...................... 12 Fish: A Healthy Part of Your Diet Recent Publications .............. 13 There are many benefits to including fish in a balanced diet for people of all ages. Fish are Upcoming Meetings high in protein, low in fat, rich in many vitamins and minerals, and are the primary food and Conferences ................... 14 source of healthy oils called omega-3 fatty acids. Studies suggest that omega-3 fatty acids are important during fetal brain and eye development and may help to prevent heart disease in adults. Additionally, fishing can be a rewarding hobby that brings people closer to nature, provides a source of natural food, and can even help with wildlife conservation. Unfortunately, some fish in Ohio’s waters are contaminated with harmful chemicals like methylmercury and a group of chemicals called polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Over time, eating contaminated fish can cause health problems. By making safe fish choices, all Ohioans can enjoy the health benefits that fish offer. Choose Better Fish In general, some fish tend to be lower in contaminants than others.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Miami River Designation
    Little Miami Scenic River Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Watercraft 2045 Morse Road Building A Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693 In this document: Water Quality ..................................................................2 Little Miami River Designation .................................2 Scenic River Designation ...........................................3 Help Protect Ohio’s Scenic Rivers ............................3 Paddling Safety ..............................................................4 Paddling Access Chart ............................................5-6 Paddling Access Map ............................................ 7-11 Little Miami River Visit the ODNR Division of Watercraft web page at watercraft.ohiodnr.gov or call 1.877.4BOATER (Ohio only) for more information An Equal Opportunity Employer 1-800-750-0750 or 711 for use with TTD/TTY The Ohio Department of Natural Resources does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age or disability in employment or the provision of services. watercraft.ohiodnr.gov/LittleMiamiSR 1 of 11 September 2012 Water Quality Little Miami River Designation he Little Miami River is one of Ohio’s highest quality ell before legislation was passed creating wild, scenic, and Triver systems with exceptional water quality and Wrecreational rivers, there was state and local interest in biological diversity. The Ohio Environmental Protection protecting the Little Miami River. In an effort to determine the Agency (OEPA) has recorded 78 fish species from the system potential of including the Little Miami in a national system of including 3 state-endangered and 2 state-threatened species. designated rivers, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Historically, 36 species of unionid mollusks have been recorded with the encouragement of local organizations, asked the Ohio from the Little Miami including 1 federally-endangered, University Planning Institute in March 1966 to study both the 5 state-endangered, and 2 state-threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Toledo-Magazine-Fall-Fly-Fishing.Pdf
    TOLEDO MAGAZINE toledoBlade.com THE BLADE, TOLEDO, OHIO SUNDAY, OCTOBER 30, 2011 SECTION B, PAGE 6 THE OUTDOORS PAGE !7BB<BO<?I>?D= on the scenic Little Beaver Creek BLADE WATERCOLOR/JEFF BASTING PHOTOS BY MIKE MAINHART By STEVE POLLICK and JEFF BASTING t is time well-spent, flycasting bald eagle, an osprey, and, around for smallmouth bass on a re- the next bend, two deer, wading, Imote, wild, scenic stream on one of them a nice buck. This is a a sunny autumn day. place to lose track of time. The surprising thing is that here It is not easy wading over the cob- on Little Beaver Creek, it is so wild, ble for hours, but too soon the sun- so quiet, so remote that you wonder shot shadows are getting long and whether you actually are in Ohio. you realize that you are a steady, 45- Hard by the Pennsylvania line on minute hike from the Jeep, follow- the eastern border of Ohio, 36 miles ing an old mule towpath. Tracing it of the Little Beaver system comprise is a godsend when you are hungry a state and national wild and scenic and tired and want to “get back.” river. A 2,722-acre state park named The raised path was used in the for the creek is a good place for an 1830s and 1840s by muleskinners outing, the bridges at its upper and prodding teams that pulled tow- lower ends making nice bookends boats through the 90 locks of the 73- for a day astream. mile-long Sandy and Beaver Canal.
    [Show full text]
  • FFY13 Ohio Nonpoint Source Management Program Annual Report
    2013 Nonpoint Source Program FY13 Annual Report September 30, Big Walnut Creek Galena, Ohio Photo by Russ Gibson John Kasich, Governor Mary Taylor, Lt. Governor Scott Nally, Director TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Program & Organizational Management ........................................................................................................ 1 Section 319(h) Grant Management ................................................................................................................. 4 FY09 Section 319(h) Grant Lake St. Marys Project ............................................................................... 9 FY11 Section 319(h) Buckeye Lake Nutrient Reduction Project ......................................................... 12 Statewide SWIF Grant Management ............................................................................................................. 16 FY10 Statewide SWIF Grant Management.......................................................................................... 17 FY12 Statewide SWIF Grant Management.......................................................................................... 18 Cuyahoga County GLRI-SWIF Grants ............................................................................................................. 21 FY12 Cuyahoga County GLRIL-SWIF Grant Management ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • Scenic Rivers 50Th Anniversary Celebration Is June 10 Ashtabula County Has More Scenic Rivers Than Any Other Ohio County
    For Immediate Release Scenic Rivers 50th Anniversary Celebration is June 10 Ashtabula County has more Scenic Rivers than any other Ohio county • Contact: Ashtabula County Board of Commissioners, 576-3750 or Metroparks, 576-0717; Mathew Smith, ODNR, 440-225-5582 • Logo, photos of Ashtabula County scenic rivers available; email [email protected] • Sidebar of river-related events follows feature JEFFERSON—Fifty years ago, the Ohio Legislature became the first state to pass a Scenic Rivers Act, thus foreshadowing The Federal Scenic Rivers legislation by several months. Since then, 14 Ohio river systems have been designated state scenic rivers by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR). With three of those streams in Ashtabula County, it is fitting that a celebration be held this year to mark passage of the legislation and the resulting benefits. That event is scheduled for June 10 at the Harpersfield Covered Bridge Metropark on the Grand River. The celebration will be from 1 to 4 p.m. and is free and open to the public with activities for all ages. “Ashtabula County is blessed with having three rivers that have been designated “scenic” in the state of Ohio. This is a true testament to the many natural resources that we have to enjoy here in our backyard. I encourage our county residents to take a moment to explore the many natural treasures that we have here throughout Ashtabula County,” said County Commissioner Casey Kozlowski. “I am thankful we have taken such an effort to preserve and appreciate our rivers. I walk the Ashtabula River often with my kids and enjoy the beauty.
    [Show full text]