DOCSLIB.ORG

The Following Provisions Are Part of Your Christmas Tree Permit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Following Provisions Are Part of Your Christmas Tree Permit United States Department of Agrigulculture Back Panel Heading Supervisor’s Office The Following Provisions Are Part 3200 SW Jefferson Way of Your Christmas Tree Permit Corvallis, OR 97331 (541) 750-7000 1. Christmas tree permit tags issued by www.fs.fed.us/r6/Siuslaw the Siuslaw National Forest are valid ONLYThis is within a good the place Siuslaw to National Forest and Oregon Dunes National Recreationbriefly, but boundaries. effectively, Hebo Ranger District 31525 Hwy 22 *summarizePermit tags are your NOT products valid on public P.O. Box 235 orlands services. administered Sales by copy other isagencies Hebo, OR 97122 or on privately owned lands. (503) 392-5100 typically not included here. 2. All Christmas tree sales are final. NO REFUNDS. Lorem ipsum dolor sit Waldport Office 3. Youramet, Christmas consectetuer tree tag adipis-must be 1130 Forestry Lane attached to your tree immediately after P.O. Box 400 itcing is cut elit, or dug. sed Fordiem trees nonum- that are dug, Waldport, OR 97394 please fill in the hole. my nibh euismod tincidunt (541) 563-8400 4. Onlyut lacreet one tree dolor may beet cutac- or dug with each permit tag. cumsan. Oregon Dunes 5. You may NOT cut the top off a tree or National Recreation Area cut/dig trees more than 12 feet tall. 855 Hwy 101 Reedsport, OR 97467 6. Cut your tree off close to the ground, (541) 271-6000 leaving a stump less than 6 inches high with no live branches attached to it. 7. Cut or dig your tree only if another tree is within 10 feet. 8. The cutting or digging of Pacific yew trees is prohibited. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation and marital 9. NO cutting or digging within 200 or family status. (Not all prohibited apply to all programs.) Persons with feet of any surface water (streams, disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s lakes). TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a com- plaint of discrimination, write USDA Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Ave. SW, 10. NO ATVs or off highway vehicles Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TTY). allowed. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. SIU-14-15 Siuslaw National Forest Sand Lake Christmas tree cutting/digging is RNA Areas Prohibited from Sand Lake PROHIBITED in the following areas: Rec. Area Christmas Tree Reneke Cutting/Digging 1. Campgrounds, developed recreation sites Creek RNA and lands within 200 feet of these areas. All designated hiking trails and 100 feet Mt. Hebo on each side. SIA Neskowin Map Legend Crest RNA 2. Sand Lake Research Natural Area Siuslaw National Forest 3. Sand Lake Recreational Area 4. Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area Cascade Prohibited Areas Head 5. Reneke Creek Research Natural Area SRA & EF Ranger Station 6. Top of Mt. Hebo from the intersection of City FS roads 14 & 1432 to North Lake. Flynn Abbreviations Creek RNA 7. Neskowin Crest Research Natural Area Marys Peak SIA 8. Cascade Head Scenic Research Area and EFEF -– Experimental Experimental Forest Forest Cascade Head Experimental Forest NRARNA -– Research Natural Natural Research Area Drift Creek 9. Flynn Creek Research Natural Area Wilderness Area SIASIA -– Special Special Interest Interest Area 10. Marys Peak: All forest lands north of Hwy. 34 in Benton County, including all Corvallis SRA - ScenicArea Research Area National Forest land accessed by Marys Watershed SRA – Scenic Research Peak Road and Woods Creek Road. Cape Perpetua SIA Area 11. Corvallis Watershed Cummins/ Gwynn 12. Drift Creek Wilderness Creek RNA 13. Cape Perpetua Special Interest Area and Rock Creek Cummins Creek Wilderness Cummins/Gwynn Creek Research Area Wilderness 14. Cummins Creek Wilderness and Rock Creek Wilderness Kentucky 15. Kentucky Falls Special Interest Area Falls SIA Note: Northwest Pass may be required for parking, depending on the harvest site. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Yachats FY2020-21 Adopted Budget
    City of Yachats FY2020-21 Adopted Budget City of Yachats Annual Budget Fiscal Year July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021 CITY COUNCIL W. John Moore, Mayor Max Glenn, Council President James Tooke, Council Member Leslie Vaaler, Council Member Mary Ellen O’Shaughnessey, Council Member BUDGET COMMITTEE – CITIZEN MEMBERS Lance Bloch Don Groth Dawn Keller John Purcell Brad Webb CITY STAFF Shannon Beaucaire, City Manager Kimmie Jackson, Deputy Recorder David Buckwald, Wastewater Lead Rick McClung, Water Lead www.yachatsoregon.org 2 of 108 City of Yachats FY2020-21 Proposed Budget Table of Contents Reader's Guide: How to Make the Most of the Budget Document ......................................................................... 6 City of Yachats Budget Message ............................................................................................................................... 7 About the City of Yachats ........................................................................................................................................ 29 Yachats Vision Statement ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Council Goals ........................................................................................................................................................... 30 Revenue............................................................................................................................................................... 31
    [Show full text]
  • Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin, Oregon by Curt N. Veldhuisen a THESIS Oregon State University in Partia
    Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin, Oregon by Curt N. Veldhuisen A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Completed February 20, 1990 Commencement June 1990 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Curt N. Veldhuisenfor the degree of Master of Science in Forest Engineeringpresented on February 27, 1990. Title: Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin. Oregon Abstract Approved: Robert L. Beschta This study examined the occurrence ofcoarse woody debris (i.e., pieces greater than 0.15m in diameter and 2.0 m in length) in first- through fifth-order streams located within the Drift Creek Basin of the Oregon Coast Range. Nine "tributary reachest were surveyed to determine how three land management treatments (undisturbed, patch clearcut with buffer strip, and entirely clearcut) and/or geomorphologywere associated with CWD loadings or piece characteristics. An additional 45 km of third- to fifth-order channelswere surveyed to identify CWD distribution patternsover changing stream size. All surveys recorded channel characteristics and the dimensions and attributes ofeach CWD piece. Coarse woody debris loadings varied greatly (11 to 62 pieces/lOOm, 0.3 to 4.3 m3/100m2 of inchannelvolume) between the tributary reaches, but were not significantly (p > 0.10) related to harvest treatment. However, reaches associated with clearcut treatment containedless hardwood CWD and pieces were significantly shorter, and more decayed than in the other treatments. This suggested that little CWD recruitment had occurred in the 15 to 20 years since harvest. The undisturbed and buffer strip tributaries contained CWD that reflected continued recruitment of both hardwood and conifer trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019
    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
    [Show full text]
  • OR Wild -Backmatter V2
    208 OREGON WILD Afterword JIM CALLAHAN One final paragraph of advice: do not burn yourselves out. Be as I am — a reluctant enthusiast.... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted fanatic. Save the other half of your- selves and your lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough to fight for the land; it is even more important to enjoy it. While you can. While it is still here. So get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests, climb the mountains, bag the peaks, run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and lucid air, sit quietly for awhile and contemplate the precious still- ness, the lovely mysterious and awesome space. Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and your head firmly attached to the body, the body active and alive and I promise you this much: I promise you this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those desk-bound men with their hearts in a safe-deposit box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators. I promise you this: you will outlive the bastards. —Edward Abbey1 Edward Abbey. Ed, take it from another Ed, not only can wilderness lovers outlive wilderness opponents, we can also defeat them. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men (sic) UNIVERSITY, SHREVEPORT UNIVERSITY, to do nothing. MES SMITH NOEL COLLECTION, NOEL SMITH MES NOEL COLLECTION, MEMORIAL LIBRARY, LOUISIANA STATE LOUISIANA LIBRARY, MEMORIAL —Edmund Burke2 JA Edmund Burke. 1 Van matre, Steve and Bill Weiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Wilderness-Like Areas, but Instead Declassified Previously Protected Wildlands with High Timber Value
    48 OREGON WILD A Brief Political History of Oregon’s Wilderness Protections Government protection should be thrown around every wild grove and forest on the Although the Forest Service pioneered the concept of wilderness protection in the mountains, as it is around every private orchard, and trees in public parks. To say 1920s and 1930s, by the late 1940s and 1950s, it was methodically undoing whatever nothing of their values as fountains of timber, they are worth infinitely more than all good it had done earlier by declassifying administrative wilderness areas that contained the gardens and parks of town. any commercial timber. —John Muir1 Just prior to the end of its second term, and after receiving over a million public comments in support of protecting national forest roadless areas, the Clinton Administration promulgated a regulation (a.k.a. “the Roadless Rule”) to protect the Inadequacies of Administrative remaining unprotected wildlands (greater than 5,000 acres in size) in the National Forest System from road building and logging. At the time, Clinton’s Forest Service Protections chief Mike Dombeck asked rhetorically: here is “government protection,” and then there is government protection. Mere public ownership — especially if managed by the Bureau of Is it worth one-quarter of 1 percent of our nation’s timber supply or a fraction of a Land Management — affords land little real or permanent protection. fraction of our oil and gas to protect 58.5 million acres of wild and unfragmented land T National forests enjoy somewhat more protection than BLM lands, but in perpetuity?2 to fully protect, conserve and restore federal forests often requires a combination of Wilderness designation and additional appropriate congressional Dombeck’s remarks echoed those of a Forest Service scientist from an earlier era.
    [Show full text]
  • New to Newport Guide
    New to Newport Guide Welcome! We’re happy to have you join the Hatfield student community! To help you settle in and answer some burning questions, we’ve prepared a brief explainer on the slightly-quirky town of Newport and the people that live here. By HSO grad students Updated 9/2020 Yaquina Head Lighthouse (Image courtesy of Hillary Thalmann) Table of Contents Getting Settled In at HMSC ................................................................................................................... 3 Grad School in the time of COVID-19 ................................................................................................. 6 Hatfield Student Organization ........................................................................................................... 6 Guin Library Resources ......................................................................................................................... 7 Racial Justice Resources at HMSC ...................................................................................................... 9 HMSC Green Team, Recycling, and Fresh Food Options ............................................................ 10 Commuting from Newport ................................................................................................................. 13 Housing .................................................................................................................................................... 14 Healthcare on the Coast .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 98-328-June 26, 1984
    98 STAT. 272 PUBLIC LAW 98-328-JUNE 26, 1984 Public Law 98-328 98th Congress An Act June 26, 1984 To designate certain national forest system and other lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System, and for other purposes. [H.R. 1149] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Oregon United States ofAmerica in Congress assembled, That this Act may Wilderness Act be referred to as the "Oregon Wilderness Act of 1984". of 1984. National SEc. 2. (a) The Congress finds that- Wilderness (1) many areas of undeveloped National Forest System land in Preservation the State of Oregon possess outstanding natural characteristics System. which give them high value as wilderness and will, if properly National Forest preserved, contribute as an enduring resource of wilderness for System. the ben~fit of the American people; (2) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation (RARE II) of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have identified areas which, on the basis of their landform, ecosystem, associated wildlife, and location, will help to fulfill the National Forest System's share of a quality National Wilderness Preservation System; and (3) the Department of Agriculture's second roadless area review and evaluation of National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon and the related congressional review of such lands have also identified areas which do not possess outstand­ ing wilderness attributes or which possess outstanding energy, mineral, timber, grazing, dispersed recreation and other values and which should not now be designated as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System but should be avail­ able for nonwilderness multiple uses under the land manage­ ment planning process and other applicable laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State
    Table 7 - National Wilderness Areas by State * Unit is in two or more States ** Acres estimated pending final boundary determination + Special Area that is part of a proclaimed National Forest State National Wilderness Area NFS Other Total Unit Name Acreage Acreage Acreage Alabama Cheaha Wilderness Talladega National Forest 7,400 0 7,400 Dugger Mountain Wilderness** Talladega National Forest 9,048 0 9,048 Sipsey Wilderness William B. Bankhead National Forest 25,770 83 25,853 Alabama Totals 42,218 83 42,301 Alaska Chuck River Wilderness 74,876 520 75,396 Coronation Island Wilderness Tongass National Forest 19,118 0 19,118 Endicott River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 98,396 0 98,396 Karta River Wilderness Tongass National Forest 39,917 7 39,924 Kootznoowoo Wilderness Tongass National Forest 979,079 21,741 1,000,820 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 654 654 Kuiu Wilderness Tongass National Forest 60,183 15 60,198 Maurille Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 4,814 0 4,814 Misty Fiords National Monument Wilderness Tongass National Forest 2,144,010 235 2,144,245 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Petersburg Creek-Duncan Salt Chuck Wilderness Tongass National Forest 46,758 0 46,758 Pleasant/Lemusurier/Inian Islands Wilderness Tongass National Forest 23,083 41 23,124 FS-administered, outside NFS bdy 0 15 15 Russell Fjord Wilderness Tongass National Forest 348,626 63 348,689 South Baranof Wilderness Tongass National Forest 315,833 0 315,833 South Etolin Wilderness Tongass National Forest 82,593 834 83,427 Refresh Date: 10/14/2017
    [Show full text]
  • South Central Coast Section of Oregon Chart 3
    Human Use and Management Chart Series South Central Coast Section of Oregon Chart 3 124°50'W 124°45'W 124°40'W 124°35'W 124°30'W 124°25'W 124°20'W 124°15'W 124°10'W 124°5'W 124°0'W 123°55'W 123°50'W 5 -7 -7 5 Alsea Bay - 1 0 0 -1 00 - 50 Alsea River -75 0 -5 Waldport 0 N 50 ' - y r 5 2 5 a ° 7 0 d - 34 4 -5 n 4 u 0 o -5 B N a ' e 0 - - 5 7 S 2 7 7 5 - l ° - 5 5 7 a 4 7 5 - i r 4 5 o t 7 i - r r e T -75 -75 0 0 5 5 - -100 - - 5 75 -12 0 -10 Smelt Sands -7 A17 5 Perpetua Bank N ' 0 2 ° Yachats 4 Yachats Marine Garden 4 -1 0 0 N ' 5 5 - 1 7 2 ° - 5 4 -75 4 Yachats Ocean Rd State Wayside Cape Perpetua Lincoln County - - Cape Perpetua Marine Garden 10 1 -75 0 0 00 0 -1 -10 5 0 7 -100 - 0 Neptune State Park 0 Neptune 1 - Intertidal Research Reserve State Park -10 0 5 -7 - 1 0 - 1 0 -75 0 - -10 0 10 0 0 0 0 -1 Strawberry Hill 0 0 1 Cummins Creek Wilderness - Lane County - 1 0 Bob Creek 0 -100 -1 00 N ' 5 5 1 7 ° - -1 00 4 4 -75 5 7 - N - -100 7 ' 5 0 5 1 Stonefield Beach State Park ° 7 - 4 4 A18 - 125 - -100 125 5 -7 Rock Creek Wilderness -125 -125 5 -100 7 - -75 N ' 0 d -12 1 n 5 ° u 4 o 4 R - -1 r 0 a 0 e Devil's Elbow State Park N ' Carl G Washburne Memorial Y 5 ° 0 - 1 5 4 -125 - State Park 0 4 -125 0 - 125 -125 -125 -125 Sea Lion Point 0 0 -1 5 - - 12 1 1 - - 2 12 5 2 5 5 -12 5 - 12 5 5 2 0 A19 1 0 - 1 - -1 00 -125 A20 -1 25 Sutton Lake ACEC -125 N ' 5 ° - - 4 1 1 0 4 0 0 0 -125 Sutton Lake N ' d 0 n ° Marsh Preserve u 4 o 4 36 R - - r 1 a 2 125 e 5 5 - Y 2 -1 -125 0 0 1 - -1 25 5 -12 126 d n u o R - r a e 126 Y - Heceta Valley 1 2 Siuslaw
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysomphalina Grossula (Pers.) Norvell, Redhead & Ammirati
    S3 - 44 Chrysomphalina grossula (Pers.) Norvell, Redhead & Ammirati ROD name Chrysomphalina grossula Family Tricholomataceae Morphological Habit mushroom Description: CAP 2-35 (-60) mm broad, convex to plano-convex with incurved margin when young, becoming convexo-umbilicate to uplifted with age, moist, hygrophanous, striate, smooth, initially yellow to brown or green-yellow, becoming pale green-yellow with age or even off-white, color of margin yellow to green-yellow; with age the entire cap almost white. GILLS strongly decurrent, initially ending at the same point on the stem apex, arcuate, thickened in age and often intervenous, edges even, yellow to green- yellow becoming slightly paler to off-white on exposure or with age. STEM central, 5-40 (-55) mm long, more or less equal 1.5-7 mm at apex, usually hollow in mature specimens, more or less smooth but may appear minutely pubescent, yellow or green-yellow. ODOR AND TASTE not distinct. PILEIPELLIS of thin-walled, smooth, nongelatinized, compactly parallel to subparallel hyphae. BASIDIA 33-48 x 5-8 µm, cylindrical to narrowly clavate, (2-) 4 spored. STERIGMATA 3-7.4 (10) µm long. CYSTIDIA absent. CLAMP CONNECTIONS absent. SPORES ellipsoid to subellipsoid 6-9.5 x 3.7-5.5 (-6) µm, with conspicuous obtuse apiculus and rounded apex, hyaline, smooth, thin walled, inamyloid, spore print white. Distinguishing Features: Chrysomphalina grossula is a small, green-yellow mushroom with brown or green-yellow, moist, initially convex then uplifted-umbilicate caps, with yellow to green-yellow, strongly decurrent, widely separated thickened gills, and slightly paler hollow stems. Chrysomphalina grossula is similar in size and habit to Omphalina ericetorum.
    [Show full text]
  • Eg-Or-Index-170722.05.Pdf
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Burns Paiute Tribal Reservation G-6 Siletz Reservation B-4 Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Reservation B-3 Umatilla Indian Reservation G-2 Fort McDermitt Indian Reservation H-9,10 Warm Springs Indian Reservation D-3,4 Ankeny National Wildlife Refuge B-4 Basket Slough National Wildlife Refuge B-4 Badger Creek Wilderness D-3 Bear Valley National Wildlife Refuge D-9 9 Menagerie Wilderness C-5 Middle Santiam Wilderness C-4 Mill Creek Wilderness E-4,5 Black Canyon Wilderness F-5 Monument Rock Wilderness G-5 Boulder Creek Wilderness C-7 Mount Hood National Forest C-4 to D-2 Bridge Creek Wilderness E-5 Mount Hood Wilderness D-3 Bull of the Woods Wilderness C,D-4 Mount Jefferson Wilderness D-4,5 Cascade-Siskiyou National Monument C-9,10 Mount Thielsen Wilderness C,D-7 Clackamas Wilderness C-3 to D-4 Mount Washington Wilderness D-5 Cold Springs National Wildlife Refuge F-2 Mountain Lakes Wilderness C-9 Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area Newberry National Volcanic Monument D-6 C-2 to E-2 North Fork John Day Wilderness G-3,4 Columbia White Tailed Deer National Wildlife North Fork Umatilla Wilderness G-2 Refuge B-1 Ochoco National Forest E-4 to F-6 Copper Salmon Wilderness A-8 Olallie Scenic Area D-4 Crater Lake National Park C-7,8 Opal Creek Scenic Recreation Area C-4 Crooked River National Grassland D-4 to E-5 Opal Creek Wilderness C-4 Cummins Creek Wilderness A,B-5 Oregon Badlands Wilderness D-5 to E-6 Deschutes National Forest C-7 to D-4 Oregon Cascades Recreation Area C,D-7 Diamond Craters Natural Area F-7 to G-8 Oregon
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed-Scale Vegetation Patterns in a Late-Successional Forest Landscape in the Oregon Coast Range
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michael C. Wimberly for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest Science presented on May 14, 1999. Title: Watershed-Scale Vegetation Patterns in a Late-Successional Forest Landscape in the Oregon Coast Range. Signature redactedfor privacy. Abstract approved: Thomas A. Spies Knowledge about vegetation patterns and ecological processes in unmanaged, late- successional watersheds is needed to provide a foundation for forest management strategies aimed at conserving native biodiversity. I examined influences of environmental variability and disturbance history on forest structure and composition in the Cummins Creek Wilderness, located on the central Oregon coast. Climatic and topographic variables explained the majority of hilislope community composition, while fire history explained most of the variability in hilislope forest structure. Forest structure and composition in riparianareas was related to a climatic gradient as well as position in the stream network. The abundance of two fire-sensitive species, Tsuga heterophylla (western hemlock) and Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce), decreased with distance from old-growth patches, possibly reflectinga seed dispersal gradient that occurred following fires 80 to 140 yearsago. I developed predictive maps of understory conifer patterns using remote sensing, aerial photographs, digital elevation models and streammaps. I predicted P. sitchensis regeneration based on distance from the coast and topography, and T heterophylla regeneration based on crown size,
    [Show full text]