JJ Part a Approved 5010 Errata Vendors
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Cloud Based Patient-Centered Ehealth Record
International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, vol 7 no 1 & 2, year 2015, http://www.iariajournals.org/life_sciences/ 30 A Cloud Based Patient-Centered eHealth Record Konstantinos Koumaditis, Leonidas Katelaris, and Marinos Themistocleous Department of Digital Systems University of Piraeus Piraeus, Greece e-mail: (konkoum,lkatelaris,mthemist)@unipi.gr Abstract - This research focuses on the Patient-Centered integrated view of citizens health status. The latter is reflected e-Health (PCEH) concept by introducing its importance in EHRs and Personal Health Records (PHRs), which are and demonstrating a multidisciplinary project that being enriched and exploited by different actors and combines advanced technologies. The project links stakeholders (i.e., health and care professionals, citizens, several aspects of PCEH functionality, such as: (a) nutrition experts, hospitals, etc.) in the health ecosystem. homecare telemedicine technologies, (b) e-prescribing, e- Three general PHR models have been proposed [7]: a) the referral, e-learning and (c) state-of-the-art technologies stand-alone model, b) Electronic Health Record (EHR) like cloud computing and Service Oriented Architecture system, and c) the integrated one, which is an interoperable (SOA), will lead to an innovative integrated e-health system providing linkage with a variety of patient platform that delivers many benefits to the society, the information sources, such as EHRs, home diagnostics, economy, the industry and the research community. This insurance claims etc. The main types of health information paper provides insights of the PCEH concept and the supported by PHRs are problem lists, procedures, major current stages of the project. In doing so, we aim to illnesses, provider lists, allergy data, home-monitored data, increase the awareness of this significant work and family history, social history and lifestyle, immunizations, disseminate the knowledge gained so far through our medications and laboratory tests [8, 9]. -
Software & Services
SOFTWARE & SERVICES Recognizing the software and service organizations that excelled in helping providers deliver better patient care PHYSICIAN PRACTICE SOLUTIONS BEST IN KLAS AMBULATORY EMR (1–10 PHYSICIANS) HOW DO VENDOR SOLUTIONS COMPARE? WHO IS KONFIDENCE SCORE TREND LEVEL 1. Cerner PowerChart Ambulatory BEST IN KLAS? 84.3 +13% üü 2. Amazing Charts 83.3 +4% üüü 3. SRSsoft EHR 81.0 -11% üü 4. athenahealth athenaClinicals 80.9 -7% üüü 5. Greenway PrimeSUITE Chart 79.1 -2% üüü HOW DO THEY SCORE? 6. Aprima EHR IN FIVE KEY PERFORMANCE CATEGORIES 78.2 -1% üüü 100 92.4 7. ADP AdvancedMD EHR +3% üüü 90 84.9 78.0 80.6 81.7 81.2 80 8. e-MDs Chart -13% üüü 70 74.0 60 AVG. SEGMENT MKT. 9. GE Healthcare Centricity Practice Solution EMR +1% üü PHYSICIAN PRACTICE PHYSICIAN 50 73.8 40 T10. eClinicalWorks EHR 73.4 -7% üüü 30 20 T10. Henry Schein MicroMD EMR 73.4 +4% üü 10 12. NextGen Healthcare EHR 0 65.1 -3% üüü SALES & FUNCTIONALITY GENERAL CONTRACTING & UPGRADES 13. Allscripts Professional EHR 64.7 -6% üüü SERVICE & IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT 14. McKesson Practice Partner -14% & TRAINING 48.0 üü 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 SEE HOW OTHER VENDOR SOLUTIONS SCORE AT KLASRESEARCH.COM HOW DO THE TOP THREE SOLUTIONS TREND? SOLUTIONS NOT RANKED PRELIMINARY DATA PRODUCTS CompuGroup Medical Enterprise EHR (HEHR)*..................71.0 MIE WebChart EMR* ............................................................75.7 MTBC EMR* .........................................................................82.1 Optum Physician EMR* ........................................................79.6 -
Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund
Quarterly Holdings Report for Fidelity® Total Market Index Fund May 31, 2021 STI-QTLY-0721 1.816022.116 Schedule of Investments May 31, 2021 (Unaudited) Showing Percentage of Net Assets Common Stocks – 99.3% Shares Value Shares Value COMMUNICATION SERVICES – 10.1% World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. Class A (b) 76,178 $ 4,253,780 Diversified Telecommunication Services – 1.1% Zynga, Inc. (a) 1,573,367 17,055,298 Alaska Communication Systems Group, Inc. 95,774 $ 317,970 1,211,987,366 Anterix, Inc. (a) (b) 16,962 838,941 Interactive Media & Services – 5.6% AT&T, Inc. 11,060,871 325,521,434 Alphabet, Inc.: ATN International, Inc. 17,036 805,292 Class A (a) 466,301 1,099,001,512 Bandwidth, Inc. (a) (b) 34,033 4,025,764 Class C (a) 446,972 1,077,899,796 Cincinnati Bell, Inc. (a) 84,225 1,297,065 ANGI Homeservices, Inc. Class A (a) 120,975 1,715,426 Cogent Communications Group, Inc. (b) 66,520 5,028,912 Autoweb, Inc. (a) (b) 6,653 19,028 Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. (a) 110,609 1,035,300 Bumble, Inc. 77,109 3,679,641 Globalstar, Inc. (a) (b) 1,067,098 1,707,357 CarGurus, Inc. Class A (a) 136,717 3,858,154 IDT Corp. Class B (a) (b) 31,682 914,343 Cars.com, Inc. (a) 110,752 1,618,087 Iridium Communications, Inc. (a) 186,035 7,108,397 DHI Group, Inc. (a) (b) 99,689 319,005 Liberty Global PLC: Eventbrite, Inc. (a) 114,588 2,326,136 Class A (a) 196,087 5,355,136 EverQuote, Inc. -
Healthcare Industry Highlight: Revenue Cycle Management
Industry Highlight: Revenue Cycle Management Q1 2019 RCM Overview Intelligent, Automated Workflow Patient Access Claims Management RCM intelligently automates the complex tasks of the front and back office, optimizing: Case Management ✓ Patient encounters and consolidation of REVENUE records Charges & CYCLE ✓ Participation in value-based programs to Reimbursement generate maximum revenue ✓ Claims management, accounts receivable and claim resubmission Clinical ✓ Medical practice workflow, reducing Documentation redundant staff effort Medical Coding Increasing complexity in medical coding and rising healthcare costs make RCM an essential tool to maintain cash flow and stay solvent 1 RCM Market Size and Outlook The global RCM market is projected to grow to $65.2BN by 2025 from $23.6BN in 2016, a nine-year CAGR of 12.0% Value of Global RCM Market ($USD in BN) $80 Facing tight margins, time-consuming 60 regulation and enormous waste in the healthcare system, medical practices 40 are looking for adaptable solutions to streamline workflow, generating 20 significant drive in the RCM market 0 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 $23.6BN $16.5BN 40% Value of global RCM market in Estimated hospital spend on Percentage of RCM end-user market 2016 external RCM by 2020 constituted by physicians’ offices 12.0% $6.7BN 3-5% CAGR through 2025 Annual provider spend on Hospitals’ lost revenues due RCM to RCM errors 2 Source: CMS NHE Projections , Grandview Research, MicroMarketMonitor, HFMA Inefficiencies RCM Can Help Solve Key Industry Trends: -
Healthcare It Industry Update │ Q3 2016
HEALTHCARE IT INDUSTRY UPDATE │ Q3 2016 www.harriswilliams.com Investment banking services are provided by Harris Williams LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member of FINRA and SIPC, and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd, which is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Harris Williams & Co. is a trade name under which Harris Williams LLC and Harris Williams & Co. Ltd conduct business. 0 HEALTHCARE IT INDUSTRY UPDATE | Q3 2016 HEALTHCARE IT PRACTICE OVERVIEW CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . WHAT WE’RE READING Harris Williams & Co. is pleased to present our review of Q3 Healthcare IT . KEY HEALTHCARE MACRO activity. This report provides commentary and analysis on current capital market INDICATORS trends and merger and acquisition dynamics within the Healthcare IT industry. PUBLIC MARKETS . PUBLIC COMPARABLES We hope you find this edition helpful and encourage you to contact us directly if . M&A ACTIVITY you would like to discuss our perspective on current industry trends and M&A . PRIVATE PLACEMENT ACTIVITY opportunities or our relevant industry experience. IPO ACTIVITY OUR PRACTICE CONTACTS Sam Hendler Harris Williams & Co. is a leading advisor to the Healthcare IT industry. Our global Managing Director practice includes professionals across the firm from Harris Williams & Co.’s [email protected] Technology, Media & Telecom Group and Healthcare & Life Sciences Group. +1 (617) 654-2117 Jeff Bistrong HW&Co. Healthcare IT Taxonomy Managing Director [email protected] +1 (617) 654-2102 . Patient-Facing Solutions Mike Wilkins . Care Delivery: Managing Director Operational Efficiency [email protected] +1 (415) 271-3411 . Care Delivery: Clinical / Acute Thierry Monjauze Managing Director . Care Delivery: [email protected] Clinical / Non-Acute +44 20 7518 8901 CARE DELIVERY EMPLOYERS ORGANIZATIONS PATIENTS . -
This Is the 19Th Annual Sohn Investment Conference. the First
This is the 19th Annual Sohn Investment Conference. The first time Ispoke here was in 2002. It is amazing how this great event has grown, and I am honored to be here. 1 2 A couple weeks ago, we wrote in our quarterly letter that we believe that a narrow group of cool kid stocks have disconnected from traditional valuations and formed a bubble. This got a lot of criticism. Half the critics thought we were talking our book, even though we didn’t name names. The other half were upset that we didn’t tell them which stocks we were short. Since we can’t seem to please anybody, I’ve decided to validate both criticisms. Today, I’m going to illustrate the bubble basket doing a deep dive into one of the companies, while not disclosing the others. This company is an excellent company with an excellent product, run by a well‐meaning and honest, though occasionally promotional CEO. The world may be a better place if it succeeds, and even though we are short, I am in no way rooting for it to fail. Its main problem is that it isn’t positioned to succeed the way the bulls hope, as the assumptions the bulls are making are not plausible. The stock is simply at the wrong price. It’s caught up in a bubble and could easily fall 80% or more from its recent peak. Let me introduce you to athenahealth. 3 I think athena deserves a smaller capitalization, and I’m not just referring to how it fails to capitalize the first letter of its name. -
PROPERTY RIGHTS and ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS by Jessica Carges
No. 17-37 Summer 2017 MERCATUS GRADUATE POLICY ESSAY PROPERTY RIGHTS AND ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS by Jessica Carges The opinions expressed in this Graduate Policy Essay are the author’s and do not represent official positions of the Mercatus Center or George Mason University. Abstract This is an analysis of the current assignment of property rights of electronic health records and patient medical data. The paper focuses on the adverse incentives created by the current structure of property rights and hypothesizes that giving patients and provers co-ownership of medical data will best address concerns about interoperability and privacy, and also result in a number of additional positive benefits. Next the paper describes ways to make stronger patient ownership a reality despite the presence of special interest groups incentivized to block access. The paper concludes with state policy level analysis examining New Hampshire – the only state to currently grant patient ownership over medical data and electronic health record. this paper finds that state governments can follow New Hampshire’s lead and extend co-property rights to patients and providers to improve interoperability and privacy outcomes. Author Bio Jessica Carges is a research associate with the State Fiscal Health Team at The Pew Charitable Trusts. She received an MA in economics from George Mason University, and is an alumna of the Mercatus MA Fellowship program. Jessica holds a BS in economics, also from George Mason University. Committee Members Bobbi Herzberg, Distinguished Senior Fellow, F.A. Hayek Program for Advanced Study in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Nicole Fisher, President, HHR Strategies, Inc. -
Vendor Functionality Matrix January 2017 an Independent Licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association
Vendor Functionality Matrix January 2017 An Independent Licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Readiness Validated Claims Transactions (5010) 837 Professional 837 Institutional Remit Transactions (5010) 835 Professional 835 Institutional Vendor Name Real-time Transactions (5010) 27x Proprietary Real-time Messages (5010) AB50 - Summary Plan Description AB80 - Social Security Number Request Ax20 Payment History Vendors with Electronic Connectivity 2K Medical Billing Systems 3 3 Capability to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama Allscripts 3 3 Anesthesia Business Consultants 3 3 3 Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama does not endorse any one vendor over the other. This AnviCare 3 3 matrix is merely a record of vendors that have Athenahealth 3 3 3 met the technical requirements for Blue Cross connectivity and information exchange. Automated Medical 3 3 3 Availity 3 3 3 For questions regarding electronic transactions listed in the table to the left, email your EDI Avid Anesthesiology Solutions 3 3 3 3 3 Services Representative at [email protected] AXIOM Systems Inc. 3 3 or telephone 205-220-6899. BrickMed, LLC 3 3 C&S Research Corporation 3 3 3 3 CBIZ MMP 3 3 Change Healthcare 3 3 3 3 3 3 Claim.MD 3 ClaimLogic 3 3 3 Claim Remedi 3 3 3 3 Clearwave Corporation 3 ClinixMIS 3 3 3 CompuGroup Medical 3 3 3 3 Compulink Business Systems, Inc. 3 3 3 Computer Engineered Solutions, Inc. 3 3 Computers Unlimited Cortex EDI 3 3 3 3 3 Cove MD Systems 3 3 3 CPU 3 3 1 of 4 Readiness Validated Claims Transactions (5010) 837 Professional 837 Institutional Remit Transactions (5010) 835 Professional 835 Institutional Vendor Name Real-time Transactions (5010) 27x Proprietary Real-time Messages (5010) AB50 - Summary Plan Description AB80 - Social Security Number Request Ax20 Payment History Creative Concepts in Communications 3 3 Custom Software Systems, Inc. -
Top 20 Ehr Software
TOP 20 EHR SOFTWARE C M CONVERTED MEDIA TOP 20 EHR SOFTWARE 1 AdvancedMD AdvancedEHR 11 Allscripts Allscripts Professional EHR 2 Cerner Cerner Ambulatory EHR 12 CareCloud CareCloud Charts 3 athenahealth athenahealth EHR 13 CureMD All in One EHR 4 Epic Epic EHR 14 Practice Velocity VelociDoc EHR Azalea Health 5 Practice Fusion Practice Fusion EHR 15 Azalea EHR Innovations 6 Kareo Kareo Clinical 16 ReLi Med Solutions ReLiMed EMR 7 Henry Schein MicroMD EMR 17 MedEZ MedEZ 8 drchrono drchrono EHR 18 iSALUS Healthcare OfficeEMR 9 NextGen Healthcare NextGen Healthcare EHR 19 ChartLogic ChartLogic EMR Modernizing 10 EMA 20 ICANotes ICANotes EHR Medicine C M CONVERTED MEDIA EHR IN PRACTICE HOW THESE RANKINGS WERE GENERATED This ranking was determined using a number of factors including industry standing, public opinion of software, social media presence, and available software features relevant to the needs of a small business. This ranking should serve as a rough estimate of software suitability, and more in-depth analysis can be taken below or by using our EHR software comparison. C M CONVERTED MEDIA SHORTLISTING EHR VENDORS CHECKLIST Research EHR employed by similar sized practices in 1 6 Produce an RFI document and send to vendor shortlist the same specialty Identify market leading solutions which offer some 2 7 Narrow shortlist based on RFI responses support in your specialty Leverage professional network for recommendations Compile requirements and business processes in an 3 8 based on their experience RFP document Narrow shortlist based -
Electronic Medical Record Ipad Application
University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-2013 Electronic Medical Record iPad Application Mischa Symmone Buckler [email protected] Dwayne Wiliam Flaherty [email protected] John Thomas Cotham [email protected] Mark Bellott [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Part of the Other Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Buckler, Mischa Symmone; Flaherty, Dwayne Wiliam; Cotham, John Thomas; and Bellott, Mark, "Electronic Medical Record iPad Application" (2013). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1627 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EECS 400 Final Report Team Ecuador Mark Bellott Mischa Buckler John Cotham Willie Flaherty 4/26/2013 Team Ecuador: TRx iPad Application Introduction TRx is an iPad application developed for Humanitarian Health International to assist them during medical missions to underserved areas. Story [Author: John Cotham] Humanitarian Health International (HHI) is a non-profit group of medical professionals that travels to underserved towns in South America. On these trips, they provide simple but life- changing surgeries (e.g., hernia, cataracts, cleft lip). With the TRx application, HHI is leveraging new technology to help provide better care on these trips. It will be an integral part of their medical operations--helping them process and communicate with patients, keep individual records, and track their trips. -
Athenahealth Master Services Agreement Third Party Terms
ATHENAHEALTH MASTER SERVICES AGREEMENT THIRD PARTY TERMS secrets. Client shall hold in confidence and take reasonable measures, but PART 1 - GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS. not less than the measures taken by Client to safeguard its own confidential The following Third Party Terms apply to all Athena sublicenses of information, to safeguard and prohibit access to, and copying or disclosure Third Party Items (as defined in the Athenahealth Master Services of, any and all confidential information and materials provided hereunder, Agreement) to Client pursuant to agreements that Athena has made with its including, but not limited to, confidential information in or about the Third third party licensors (“Third Party Licensors”): Party Items, any updates to any of them and any user manuals for them. A. Client will not modify the Third Party Items or the substance of the M. IN NO EVENT SHALL ATHENA OR A THIRD PARTY LICENSOR data contained therein. (OR ITS SUPPLIERS), OR THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, PARTNERS OR EMPLOYEES, BE LIABLE TO CLIENT OR ANY OTHER B. Except as authorized by the applicable Third Party Licensor or as PARTY FOR ANY CONSEQUENTIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, permitted under Part 2 herein, Client will not use any Third Party Item (or any EXEMPLARY, PUNITIVE, RELIANCE OR SPECIAL DAMAGES, OR ANY data derived from it) in a computer service business or in network, time- LOSS OF USE, DATA OR, BUSINESS, PROFITS, ARISING OUT OF OR IN sharing, multiple-CPU or multiple-user arrangements (including the Internet CONNECTION WITH (1) THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THE THIRD and Intranets), or link or interface them with any other equipment, software, PARTY ITEM; (2) THE INTERRUPTION OF BUSINESS, DELAY OR data, network or communications system except in and as part of INABILITY TO USE ANY THIRD PARTY ITEM, RELATED EQUIPMENT OR athenaNet®. -
Spring 2019 Medical Practice Management
SPRING 20CUSTOMER SUCCESS 19REPORT MEDICAL PRACTICE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE CATEGORY MEDICAL PRACTICE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE OVERVIEW Medical practice management software (PMS) is designed to assist medical offices of all sizes operate more efficiently. Mostly, small and medium-size practices utilize a PMS to manage daily administrative and financial functions, and integrate it with electronic medical records The capabilities of PMS include: entering and monitoring patients, storing patient demographics, scheduling patient appointments, handling charge capture, executing billing procedures, presenting insurance claims, processing payments from third parties, insurance providers, and patients, and producing reports for employees. Medical PMS can be used to store and maintain patient records as well as manage large data sets, including details of physicians and other health care providers, medical facilities, insurance companies, procedures, and ICD codes. 2 CUSTOMER SUCCESS Company Score is affected by the following: SCORING METHODOLOGY 1. Number of employees (based on social media and public resources) The FeaturedCustomers.com Customer 2. Vendor momentum based on web traffic and Success score is based on data from our search trends customer success content platform, social 3. Employee satisfaction and engagement presence, as well as additional data aggregated (based on social network ratings) from online sources and social media properties. 4. % traffic increase to your Customer Our ranking engine applies an algorithm to all of References the data collected to calculate the overall 5. Lower Funnel SEO Key Term Rankings Customer Success score. The overall Customer Success score is a weighted average based on 3 CUSTOMER SUCCESS AWARDS parts: Market Leader (90 - 100) Content Score is affected by the following: Vendor on FeaturedCustomers.com 1.