DOCSLIB.ORG

Author Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Author Index Author Index Aarons. L. 655, 672 Adrian. E.D .. Matthews. R. Allum. 1.H.1.. see Dichgans. Aarons. L.. Halasz. H.K .. Ri­ 555. 566 1. 788. 791. 798 sen. A.H. 444. 483 Agamy, G .. see May. 1.G. Allyn. M.R .. see Festinger, Aarons. L.. see Riesen. A.H. lOS. 139 L. 563. 567 444.486 Ahr. P .. see Pasnak. R. 497, Alpern. M. 195.210.340. Abadi, R .. see Kulikowski. 519 350. 630. 632, 634. 648 1.1. 22. 37 Ahrens. R. 441. 483. 597. Alpern. M .. Rushton. Aborn. see Rubenstein 613 600,605 W.A.H. 632, 648 Abramov. r., see Valois. R.L. Ainsworth. W.A. 174 Altman, 1., see Bayer. S.A. de 6,36 Aitkin. L.M., see Moore. 912.913 Abramson, A.S .. Lisker, L. D.R. 378, 432 Amblard. Cremieux 788 362, 368. 371 Aiu. P .. see Dayton. G.O., Amblard. B .. see Flandrin. Abramson. A.S .. see Lisker. lr. 317.324.352 1.M. 423.429 L. 362. 367, 373 Akimoto. C .. see Mizuno, N. Ambler, S .. see Haggard, Ackroyd, C. Humphrey. 786. 802 M.P. 163,175 N.K., Warrington, E.K. Akishige, Y. 708 Ambrose, 1.A. 596. 605 381,427.494,517.540. Albert, D.G .. see lng, M. Amelang. W .. see Ewert. 1.­ 545 470, 485 P. 269,284 Acuna, C, see Mountcastle, Albert, M.L.. Bear, D. 721, Ames, A. 708 V.B. 901,917 726 Ames. A., Ogle, K.N., Glid­ Adair, E.R., Stevens. 1.C. Albrecht, D.G., see Valois, don, G.H. 202, 210 Marks. L.E. 854.872 R.L. de 13, 36 Ames. A., Proctor, CA. 551, Adam, 1., Ring, M. 584. Albus, K. 387. 397, 427 554. 566 588 Alexander. K.R. 632, 648 Ames, E.W .. Silfen, C.K. Adam, 1.. see Gibb, M. 584. Allen. D.B., see Leppmann, 331,350 589 P.K. 110,139 Ames, E.W .. see Brennan. Adams, G., see Brackbill. Y. Allan. L.G., Kristofferson, W. 328,351 358, 372 A.B. 714, 726 Ames, E.W., see Koopman, Adams. 1.E .. see Marg. E. Allen, G.D. 725, 726 P. 596, 607 207, 212 Allen, M.W. van, see Benton, Ames, E.W., see Saayman, Adams, P., see Wallach. H. A.L. 602, 603, 605. 892, G. 326.355 688, 689, 711 913 Ames. E.W .. see Silfen, CK. Adams. R.D., Collins. G.H .. Alley. K .. Baker. R., Simp­ 326. 327. 355 Victor. M. 908. 913 son. 1.r. 786. 795 Andermann, F., see Wilkins, Adams, W.B. 299,307 Alley, K.E., see Simpson. AJ. 888. 919 Adamson, R. 718, 726 1.r. 786, 803 Anderson. DJ., see Schnei­ Addams, R. 68, 93 Allport, D.A. 712, 724. der, L.W. 784.803 Ades, A.E. lSI. 174. 370. 727 Anderson. L.D. 594. 605 371.372 Allum, 1., see Mauritz, K.H. Anderson. P., see Mitchell. Adey, M., see Bernstein, r.H. 788. 802 D.E. 391, 392,432 647, 649 Allum. 1.H.l., Graf, W., Andre-Thomas 787. 795 Adorjani. C, see Denney. D. Dichgans, 1., Schmidt. Andrew. G .. Harlow. H.F. 787, 797 CL. 781, 783. 784, 795 280.283 922 Author Index Andrews, D.P. 23, 35 Arwas, J., see Holmes, V. Bach Y Rita, P. 340, 351, Andrews, H.C. 30, 31,35 621, 623, 625 515,517 Andrews, M.H., Brown, Aschan, G., Bergstedt, M. Bach Y Rita, P., see White, D.R. 533, 545 780, 795 B. W. 496, 506, 507, 515, Angelergues, R., see Hecaen, Aschenbrenner, C.M. 219, 517, 519 H. 600, 601, 606 254 Backlund, F., see Johansson, Anker, R.L., Cragg, B.G. Aslin, R.M., Salapatek, P. G. 706, 707, 710 381,427 325, 351 Backmund, H., see Poppel, Annis, R.C., Frost, B.J. 327, Aslin, R.N., see Banks, M.S. E. 719, 729 333,351,412,427 401,427,470,473,483 Baer, K.E. von 713, 727 Annis, R.C., Frost, B.J. 542, Assai, G. 603, 605 Bagrash, F.M. 20,35 545 Atkinson, J., see Campbell, Bagrash, F.M., Thomas, J.P., Anohkin, P.K. 322, 351 F.W. 23,36, 118, 119, Shimamura, K:K. 19.20, Anooshian, L.J., see Warren, 136 35 D.H. 501,519 Atkinson, J., see Harris, L. Bailey, P.J. 151, 174 Anstis, St. 779, 795 392, 430 Bailey, PJ., Dorman, M.F., Anstis, S.M. 640, 648, 657, Atkinson, J., see Rauschecker, Summerfield, A.Q. 157, 666, 667, 670, 671, 672 J.PJ. 118, 140 174 Anstis, S.M., Gregory, R.L. Attneave, F. 532, 545 Bailey, P.J., see Summerfield, 106, 135, 658, 672 Attneave. F .. Arnoult. M.D. A.Q. 160,161,162,178 Anstis. S.M., Harris, J.P. 532, 533, 545 Baker, E., see Blumstein, 117, 135 Attneave, P., Benson, B. 517 S.E. 892,910 Anstis, S.M., Moulden, B.P. Atkinson, J. 23, 35 Baker, F.H .. Grigg, P., Noor­ 659, 672 Atkinson. J., Braddick, 0., den, G.K. von 393, 397, Anstis, S.M., Rogers, B.J. Braddick. F. 392. 427 398, 400, 427 640,648,670, 671,672 Atkinson, J., Campbell, Baker, F.H., see Poggio, Anstis, S.M., see Blakemore F.W. 18. 34, 35 G.F. 133, 134, 140 671 Atkinson. J., Campbell, F.W., Baker, J., Gibson, A., Anstis, S.M., see Mayhew, Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L. Glickstein, M., Stein. J. J.E.W. 117,120,125, 30,35. 118, 135 786, 795 134,135,139 Atkinson. J .. Campbell, F.W., Baker, K.E., see Graham, Anstis. S.M., see Rogers, Francis, M.R. 34, 35 C.H. 188, 189,211,707, B.J. 671,673 Aubert, H. 705, 708, 795, 709 Apelle, S. 467, 483 809, 839 Baker, R., see Alley, K. 786, Appelle, S. 542, 545 Auerbach, E., see Yinon, U. 795 Applebaum, T., see Foley, 390, 397. 436 Baker, R.G., Precht, W .. Lli­ J.M. 188, 193,200,203, Augenstine, L.G. 720. 727 nas, R. 786, 795 211 August, R.V. 871,872 Baldrighi, G., see Baumgar­ Aptaker, P., see May, J.G. Augustinus 713, 727 ten, R.J. von 835, 836, 129,139 Auerbach, E., Coriell, A.S. 837,839 Arbit, J., see Drachman, 634,648 Baldrighi, G., see Shillinger. D.A. 910, 914 Awaya, S., Miyake, Y., Imai­ G.L., Jr. 836, 837, Armington, J.c., see Barnet, zaki, Y., Shiose, Y., Kan­ 844 A.B. 321,351 da, T., Komuno, K. 473, Bales, J.F., Follansbee, G.L. Armstrong, H.G. 793, 795 483 574,589 Armstrong-James, M. 379, Awaya, S., Miyake, Y., Imai­ Ballinger, E.R. 834, 839 427 zumi, Y., Shiose, Y., Kan­ Bamber, D., see Festinger, Arnold, F., Biichele, W., da, T., Komuro. K. 389, L. 447,484 Brandt, Th. 794, 795 400, 427 Banks, M.S., Aslin, R.N .. Arnold, F., see Brandt, Th. Axel, R. 717, 727 Letson, R.D. 401,427, 765, 791, 792, 796 Axelrod, S. 493, 495, 510, 470,473,483 Arnoult, M.D. 764, 765, 795, 517 Banks, M.S., Salapatek, P. 826,839 Azuma, H. 585, 588 392, 427 Arnoult, M.D., see Attneave, Banks, W.P., Kane, D.A. F. 532, 533, 545 657. 659, 665, 672 Aronson, E., see Lee, D.N. Bach, L.. Seefelder, R. 319, Bappert. J. 190. 210 772. 788. 801, 826, 843 351 Barber, T.X. 871. 872 Author Index 923 Barber. T.X .. see Forgione. Barron. R. W .. Pittinger. J. B. Bechtoldt. H.P .. see Carmon. A.G. 851. 872 741. 749 A. 235,254 Bard. P .. see Tyler. D.B. Barron. R. W., see Gibson. Beck, L Gibson, 1.J. 539, 792. 804 E.J. 746, 749 546 Barg. CF .. see Zweibelson. Barry, L.. see Fraiberg. S. Beckh, H.J.A. von 834,839 I. 510.519 513,517 Becker. B.B .. see Eriksen. Barkow. B .. see Harris. CS. Bartley. S.H. 708 C W. 635. 649 112.131. 138 Bartley. S.H .. see Graybie1. Beckwith. Fr. 0 .. see Kenne­ Barlow. H.B. 4.35, 260. 283, A. 833. 841 dy. R.S. 792. 800 427,439.483, 535. 541. Bartle). S.H .. see Schneider. Bednall. see Forster. K.I. 545, 555.566 CW. 812.844 617 Barlow. H. B .. Blakemore. C. Bartoll. S .. Birns. B .. Ronch. Beecher. H.K. 852. 853. 858. Pettigre\\'.1.D. 207.210, J. 323.351 867.872 223. 241. 254, 3R 1. 405. Bartoshuk. A.K. 359.372 Beecher. H.K .. see Smith. 406. 427, 526. 546 Basbaum, A.!" \Vall. P.O. G.M. 852,853.859.874 Barlo\\'. H.B .. Brindley. G.S. 379.427 Beers. D. 456. 483 120, 135 Basler 707 Bekes). G. von 557.566 Barlo\\. H.B .. Fitz Hugh. R .. Battersby. \V.S .. see Teuber. Belcher. 1.. see Bernstein. Kumer. S.W. 555.506 H.-L. 881. 905. 919 I.H. 647.649 Barlo\\. H.B .. Hill. R.M. 70. Bauer. 1.. see Held. R. 760. Bell. H.H .. Lappin. 1.S. 640. 72.93,659.663.665.672. 773. 774. 775. 776. 777. 648 779. 795 800, 817. 842 Bell. H.H .. see Lappin. 1.S. Barlo\\'. H.B .. Hill. R.M .. Le­ Bauer. R. 781. 795 90. 94, 640. 651, 668. 670. \ick. \\'.R. 76.93 Bauermeister. M. 809. 839 672. 673 Barlo\\'. H. B .. Levick. W. R. Bauermeister. M .. Werner. Bell. R.Q .. see Haaf. R.A. 87. 88. 93, ~61. ~62. 483, H .. Wapner. S. 810.839 327. 353. 596. 606 659.072 Baumgarten. v .. et al. 762 Beller, H.K .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Art Perception * David Cycleback
    Art Perception * David Cycleback Art Perception by David Cycleback An introduction to understanding art and aesthetic perception, covering key psychological, cognitive science, physiological and philosophical concepts. Center for Artifact Studies: cycleback.com email: [email protected] Hamerweit Books ISBN : 978-1-312-11749-5 © 2014 david rudd cycleback This book can be purchased in print (paperback) at amazon and Barnes and Noble 1 Art Perception * David Cycleback Fans feel a connection to cartoon characters, seeing them as if they’re living beings, following their lives, laughing at their jokes, feeling good when good things happen to them and bad when bad things happen. A kid can feel closer to a cartoon character than a living, breathing next door neighbor. 2 Art Perception * David Cycleback Many feel a human-to-human connection to the figure in this Modigliani painting even though it is not physically human in many ways. 3 Art Perception * David Cycleback Authentic Colors? 1800s Harper's Woodcuts, or woodcut prints from the magazine Harper's Weekly, are popularly collected today. The images show nineteenth century life, including celebrities, sports, US Presidents, war, high society, nature and street life. Though originally black and white, some of the prints have been hand colored over the years. As age is important to collectors, prints that were colored in the 1800s are more valuable than those colored recently. The problem is that modern ideas lead collectors to misdate the coloring. Due to their notions about the old fashioned Victorian era, most people assume that vintage 1800s coloring will be subtle, soft, pallid and conservative.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Illusion - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Optical illusion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Try Beta Log in / create account article discussion edit this page history [Hide] Wikipedia is there when you need it — now it needs you. $0.6M USD $7.5M USD Donate Now navigation Optical illusion Main page From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Contents Featured content This article is about visual perception. See Optical Illusion (album) for Current events information about the Time Requiem album. Random article An optical illusion (also called a visual illusion) is characterized by search visually perceived images that differ from objective reality. The information gathered by the eye is processed in the brain to give a percept that does not tally with a physical measurement of the stimulus source. There are three main types: literal optical illusions that create images that are interaction different from the objects that make them, physiological ones that are the An optical illusion. The square A About Wikipedia effects on the eyes and brain of excessive stimulation of a specific type is exactly the same shade of grey Community portal (brightness, tilt, color, movement), and cognitive illusions where the eye as square B. See Same color Recent changes and brain make unconscious inferences. illusion Contact Wikipedia Donate to Wikipedia Contents [hide] Help 1 Physiological illusions toolbox 2 Cognitive illusions 3 Explanation of cognitive illusions What links here 3.1 Perceptual organization Related changes 3.2 Depth and motion perception Upload file Special pages 3.3 Color and brightness
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Rendering of Impossible Figures
    Modeling and Rendering of Impossible Figures TAI-PANG WU The Chinese University of Hong Kong CHI-WING FU Nanyang Technological University SAI-KIT YEUNG The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology JIAYA JIA The Chinese University of Hong Kong and CHI-KEUNG TANG The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 13 This article introduces an optimization approach for modeling and rendering impossible figures. Our solution is inspired by how modeling artists construct physical 3D models to produce a valid 2D view of an impossible figure. Given a set of 3D locally possible parts of the figure, our algorithm automatically optimizes a view-dependent 3D model, subject to the necessary 3D constraints for rendering the impossible figure at the desired novel viewpoint. A linear and constrained least-squares solution to the optimization problem is derived, thereby allowing an efficient computation and rendering new views of impossible figures at interactive rates. Once the optimized model is available, a variety of compelling rendering effects can be applied to the impossible figure. Categories and Subject Descriptors: I.3.3 [Computer Graphics]: Picture/Image Generation; I.4.8 [Image Processing and Computer Vision]: Scene Analysis; J.5 [Computer Applications]: Arts and Humanities General Terms: Algorithms, Human Factors Additional Key Words and Phrases: Modeling and rendering, human perception, impossible figure, nonphotorealistic rendering ACM Reference Format: Wu, T.-P., Fu, C.-W., Yeung, S.-K., Jia, J., and Tang, C.-K. 2010. Modeling and rendering of impossible figures. ACM Trans. Graph. 29, 2, Article 13 (March 2010), 15 pages. DOI = 10.1145/1731047.1731051 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1731047.1731051 1.
    [Show full text]
  • First Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Proceedings of the Symposium on Aviation Psychology (Columbus, Ohio, April 21 and 22, 1981)
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 219 236 SE 038 287 AUTHOR Jensen, R. S. TITLE First Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Proceedings of the Symposium on Aviation Psychology (Columbus, Ohio, April 21 and 22, 1981). INSTITUTION Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Aviation Psychology Lab. SPONS AGENCY .Battelle Memorial Iftst., Columbus, Ohio. Columbus Labs.; National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Mountain View, Calif. Ames Research Center. REPORT NO APL-TR-1-81 PUB DATE Apr 81 NOTE 419p.; Also sponsored by the Association of Aviation Psychologists. EDRS PRICE- MF01/PC17 Plus Postage: DESCRIPTORS *Aerospace Education; *Aircraft Pilots; Aviation Technology; *Flight Training; Higher Education; *Human Factors Engineering; *Performance Factors; *Psychology; Visual Perception IDENTIFIERS *Aviation Psychology ABSTRACT This volume contains five complete manuscripts and two abstracts presented, and three papers submitted but not presented, at this symposium on aviation psychology. The objective of the sympo4um was to critically examine the ympact of high technology on the role, responsibility, authority, and performance of human operators in modern aircraft and air traffic control systems. Papers are grouped by the following subject area categoOes: 1) cockpit monitoring concepts; 2) cockpit information systems; 3) pilot judgment; 4) vision and visual perception; 5) crew workload, coordination, and complement; 6) pilot selection; 7) pilot training; and 8) performance assessment. (Author/JN) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** U S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION NATIONAL INSTITUTE Or EDUCATION E D, A T,(AAI HE,),;PL_S EN,(-1-4 TECHNICAL REPORT: APL-1-81 I ni u,n uun, i1.I Ir 1 11 1 I +, \If -1st First Symposium onAviation Psychology skgil 21 and 22, 1981 The Aviation Psychology Laboratory The Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio Convener: R.
    [Show full text]
  • Object Perception As Bayesian Inference
    UCLA Department of Statistics Papers Title Object Perception as Bayesian Inference Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9q6553kr Authors Kersten, Daniel Mamassian, Pascal Yuille, Alan L Publication Date 2004 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Object Perception as Bayesian Inference 1 Object Perception as Bayesian Inference Daniel Kersten Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota Pascal Mamassian Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow Alan Yuille Departments of Statistics and Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles KEYWORDS: shape, material, depth, perception, vision, neural, psychophysics, fMRI, com- puter vision ABSTRACT: We perceive the shapes and material properties of objects quickly and reliably despite the complexity and objective ambiguities of natural images. Typical images are highly complex because they consist of many objects embedded in background clutter. Moreover, the image features of an object are extremely variable and ambiguous due to the effects of projection, occlusion, background clutter, and illumination. The very success of everyday vision implies neural mechanisms, yet to be understood, that discount irrelevant information and organize ambiguous or \noisy" local image features into objects and surfaces. Recent work in Bayesian theories of visual perception has shown how complexity may be managed and ambiguity resolved through the task-dependent, probabilistic integration of prior object knowledge with image features. CONTENTS OBJECT
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Illusions Fascinate Us, Challenging
    Visual Neuroscience Optical Illusions ptical illusions fascinate us, challenging our • Luminance and contrast default notion that what we see is real. They • Motion Odemonstrate that all our perception is illusion, in • Geometric or angle illusions a sense – incoming sensory information is interpreted, • 3D interpretation: size constancy and impossible yielding the internal representation of the world. figures Therefore, after our eyes have filtered the visual input we • Cognitive/Gestalt effects need sound judgement of information in order to create • Colour our inner reality: “Your senses then you’ll have to trust, / and show examples of the first four. Many more examples of They’ll let you see what’s true and just, / Should reason illusions can be found at <http://www.michaelbach.de/ot>. Professor Michael Bach directs 8 keep your mind awake”. the Section Visual Function / What is an optical illusion? “I know it when I see one” Electrophysiology in the Dept. of could not be farther off the track – as the best illusions Ophthalmology, University of are the ones where a discrepancy from reality is not ‘seen’ Freiburg, Germany. His main interest is vision research, he pro- until one uses other modalities (eg. touch) or instru- vides a routine clinical service in ments (rulers, light metres). And even when we know ophthalmic electrodiagnostics and that we are subject to an optical illusion, most illusory is President of the International percepts still persist – a phenomenon called cognitive Society for Clinical Electro- physiology of Vision (ISCEV). impenetrability.15 As Gregory9 aptly stated it “it is surpris- Figure 1: The Hermann grid on the left with ingly hard to define ‘illusion’ in a satisfactory way”.
    [Show full text]
  • 0136 CUB Cartone#2.Indd
    When the major exhibition titled The Responsive Eye Vasarely opened at the New York Museum of Modern Art in 1965, and the ‘Op Art’ it made Optical Art famous almost overnight. The limelight was stolen by two Europeans: Josef Albers, who continued Phenomenon the legacy of the Bauhaus in his art, and Victor Vasarely. Both men were represented at the show with six works each. But márton orosz whereas Albers, oft neglected by the critics, was turned into the black sheep of the movement by contemporary art history writing,2 for Vasarely, who was just reaching the peak of his career, the show served as a launch pad to fame. The Responsive Eye was intended to take stock of the ‘…here comes Op Art!’1 latest endeavours in Optical Art. William C. Seitz, curator of victor vasarely, the exhibition, wove his concept not around the spectacle 18 April 1964 of the artworks, but around the very act of seeing. The discursive space generated between the work and the viewer became the theme of the show. The exhibits Seitz selected were all created in accordance with the so-called ‘effective theory’, as opposed to works driven by the ‘genetic aesthetic’ that conveyed the experiences of the artist in the form of a creative act, such as action painting, which recorded the dialogue between the artwork and the artist. Seitz formulated a new style category for ‘effective’ works that required the active participation of the viewer, which he called ‘perceptual abstraction’,3 borrowing a term coined by the art critic and psychologist Rudolf Arnheim.4 The exhibition catalogue made it clear that the ‘Eye’ in the title was not identical with the organ of sight – it meant more than an internal optical device that responds to environmental stimuli.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the 51St Annual Conference of the Italian Society of Neurology
    Neurological Sciences (2020) 41 (Suppl 1):S1–S347 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04753-3 ABSTRACTS Abstracts of the 51st Annual Conference of the Italian Society of Neurology CASE REPORTS References: - L. Mandigers et al. A case report of iatrogenic deterioration of yet LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES RHOMBENCEPHALITIS: A undiagnosed Rhombencephalitis; always be careful with corticoids. CHALLENGING DIAGNOSIS -BMC Clinical Pathology (2018);27;18:15 - Décard BF et al. Listeria rhombencephalitis mimicking a demyelin- S. M. Angelocola, M. Acciarri, R. Angeloni, P. Cardinali, F. Forconesi, I. ating event in an immunocompetent young patient. Multiple Paolino, E. Pucci Sclerosis (2017) Jan;23(1):123-125 - Bartt R. et al. Listeria and atypical presentations of Listeria in the Neurology Unit, "A. Murri" Hospital (Fermo) central nervous system. Semin Neurol. (2000);20(3):361-73 Neurolisteriosis may manifest in humans as meningitis, meningoen- cephalitis, and rhombencephalitis. Compared to other pathogens, PAINLESS WINGED SCAPULA AS THE ONSET OF A VERNET Listeria Monocytogenes (Lm) has a brainstem predilection. Contrary SYNDROME: A CASE REPORT to the more common meningitis, Lm rhombencephalitis occurs rarely and mostly in healthy and immunocompetent people. We describe the S. M. Angelocola, M. Acciarri, R. Angeloni, P. Cardinali, F. Forconesi, I. case of a 71-year-old immunocompetent woman previously in good Paolino, E. Pucci health.Aboutaweekbeforehospitaladmission,thepatientexperienced nausea, vomiting and diarrhea. Subsequently, dysarthria associated Neurology Unit, "A. Murri" Hospital (Fermo) with mild binocular diplopia appeared. At the time of admission, neu- rological examination showed dysarthria and right sixth and seventh “ ” “ ” cranial nerve palsy. The meningeal irritation signs were negative and The Jugular Foramen Syndrome (JFS) or Vernet syndrome (VS) body temperature was 36°C.
    [Show full text]
  • OBJECT PERCEPTION AS BAYESIAN INFERENCE Daniel
    17 Dec 2003 9:0 AR AR207-PS55-10.tex AR207-PS55-10.sgm LaTeX2e(2002/01/18) P1: GCE 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005 Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2004. 55:271–304 doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142005 Copyright c 2004 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved First published online as a Review in Advance on October 6, 2003 OBJECT PERCEPTION AS BAYESIAN INFERENCE Daniel Kersten Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455; email: [email protected] Pascal Mamassian Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QB, Scotland Alan Yuille Departments of Statistics and Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095-1554 Key Words shape, material, depth, vision, neural, psychophysics, fMRI, computer vision ■ Abstract We perceive the shapes and material properties of objects quickly and reliably despite the complexity and objective ambiguities of natural images. Typical im- ages are highly complex because they consist of many objects embedded in background clutter. Moreover, the image features of an object are extremely variable and ambiguous owing to the effects of projection, occlusion, background clutter, and illumination. The very success of everyday vision implies neural mechanisms, yet to be understood, that discount irrelevant information and organize ambiguous or noisy local image features into objects and surfaces. Recent work in Bayesian theories of visual perception has shown how complexity may be managed and ambiguity resolved through the task- dependent,
    [Show full text]