DOCSLIB.ORG

Selected Southeastern Ohio River Tributaries, 2015 Athens, Gallia, Meigs and Washington Counties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Selected Southeastern Ohio River Tributaries, 2015 Athens, Gallia, Meigs and Washington Counties Biological and Water Quality Study of Selected Southeastern Ohio River Tributaries, 2015 Athens, Gallia, Meigs and Washington Counties Ohio EPA Technical Report AMS/2015-SHADE-2 Division of Surface Water Assessment and Modeling Section August 2019 TMDL DEVELOPMENT | AMS/2015-SHADE-2 Biological and Water Quality Study of Selected Southeastern Ohio River Tributaries August 2019 Biological and Water Quality Study of Selected Southeastern Ohio River Tributaries, 2015 (Little Hocking River, Shade River, Kyger Creek, Champaign Creek) Athens, Gallia, Meigs and Washington Counties, Ohio August 2019 Ohio EPA Report AMS/2015-SHADE-2 Prepared by: State of Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Surface Water Lazarus Government Center 50 West Town Street, Suite 700 P.O. Box 1049 Columbus, Ohio 43216-1049 Division of Surface Water Southeast District Office 2195 Front St. Logan, Ohio 43138 Ecological Assessment Section Groveport Field Office 4675 Homer Ohio Lane Groveport, Ohio 43125 Mike DeWine, Governor State of Ohio Laurie A. Stevenson, Director Ohio Environmental Protection Agency AMS/2015-SHADE-2 Biological and Water Quality Study of Selected Southeastern Ohio River Tributaries August 2019 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ v Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Status of Non-Aquatic Life Uses ............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Campaign Creek, Little Campaign Creek, White Oak Creek and Little White Oak Creek [050302020902] .................. 4 Kyger Creek and Little Kyger Creek [050302020901] .......................................................................................................................... 4 Georges Creek [050302020209] ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Forest Run and Bowman Run [050302020805] ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Yellowbush Creek and Johns Run [050302020804] .............................................................................................................................. 5 Oldtown Creek [050302020803] .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Groundhog Creek [050302020802] .............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Forked Run [050302020404]........................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Shade River [050302020304] .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 East Branch Shade River and Dog Hollow Run [050302020303 & 050302020302] .............................................................. 6 Horse Cave Creek [050302020301] .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 West Branch Shade River [050302020205 & 050302020201] and Kingsbury Creek [050302020202] ...................... 6 Middle Branch Shade River [050302020203 & 050302020204] including Pratts Fork and Long Run ......................... 6 Little Hocking River and Tributaries [050302020103, 050302020104 & 050302020105] ............................................... 7 Dunfee Run [050302020106] and Mile Run [050302020102] ......................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Study Area Description ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 16 Location and Scope .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 Beneficial Uses ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Ecoregion, Geology and Soils ............................................................................................................................................................................... 16 Land Cover ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Little Hocking River and Ohio River Tributaries Watershed .......................................................................................................... 18 Shade River and Ohio River Tributaries Watershed ........................................................................................................................... 18 Campaign Creek and Kyger Creek watershed ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Watershed Groups .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18 Results ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 Chemical, Habitat and Biological Assessment .............................................................................................................................................. 22 Pollution Loadings .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 Surface Water Quality ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Physical Habitat Quality for Aquatic Life - Western Tributaries ................................................................................................... 41 Biological Quality – Fish Assemblages ....................................................................................................................................................... 47 Biological Quality – Macroinvertebrate Assemblages ........................................................................................................................ 54 Trends in Biological Community Indices .................................................................................................................................................. 63 Recreation Use ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 67 Sediment ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 70 Point Source and Nonpoint Source Impacts ................................................................................................................................................. 72 Spills .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 74 NPDES Facilities in the Little Hocking River watershed .................................................................................................................... 74 NPDES Facilities in the Shade River watershed .................................................................................................................................... 76 AMS/2015-SHADE-2 Biological and Water Quality Study of Selected Southeastern Ohio River Tributaries August 2019 NPDES Facilities in the Campaign
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ground Water Pollution Potential of Washington County, Ohio
    GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, OHIO BY MICHAEL P. ANGLE, JOSH JONAK, AND DAVE WALKER GROUND WATER POLLUTION POTENTIAL REPORT NO. 55 OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER WATER RESOURCES SECTION 2002 ABSTRACT A ground water pollution potential map of Washington County has been prepared using the DRASTIC mapping process. The DRASTIC system consists of two major elements: the designation of mappable units, termed hydrogeologic settings, and the superposition of a relative rating system for pollution potential. Hydrogeologic settings incorporate hydrogeologic factors that control ground water movement and occurrence including depth to water, net recharge, aquifer media, soil media, topography, impact of the vadose zone media, and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. These factors, which form the acronym DRASTIC, are incorporated into a relative ranking scheme that uses a combination of weights and ratings to produce a numerical value called the ground water pollution potential index. Hydrogeologic settings are combined with the pollution potential indexes to create units that can be graphically displayed on a map. Ground water pollution potential analysis in Washington County resulted in a map with symbols and colors, which illustrate areas of varying ground water pollution potential indexes ranging from 56 to 187. Washington County lies within the Nonglaciated Central hydrogeologic setting. The buried valley underlying the present Muskingum River and Ohio River basins contain sand and gravel outwash which are capable of yielding up to 500 gallons per minute (gpm) from properly designed, large diameter wells. Smaller tributaries contain only thin, fine-grained alluvial/lacustrine deposits commonly yielding less than 5 gpm.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene History of a Part of the Hocking River Valley, Ohio1
    PLEISTOCENE HISTORY OF A PART OF THE HOCKING RIVER VALLEY, OHIO1 WILLIAM M. MERRILL Department of Geology, University of Illinois, Urbana Drainage modifications caused by glaciation in the Ohio River basin have been the subjects of numerous papers since late in the nineteenth century. Tight (1900, 1903) and Leverett (1902) were the first to present a coordinated picture of the pre-glacial drainage and the successive changes that occurred as a result of the several glacial advances into Ohio. Many shorter papers, by the same and other OHIO writers, were published before and after these volumes. More recently, Stout and Lamb (1938) and Stout, Ver Steeg, and Lamb (1943) presented summaries of the drainage history of Ohio. These are based in part upon Tight's work but also introduce many new facts and give a more detailed account of the sequence of Published by permission of the Chief, Division of Geological Survey, Ohio Department of Natural Resources. THE OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 53(3): 143, May, 1953. 144 WILLIAM M. MERRILL Vol. LIII drainage changes and their causal factors. The bulletin published by Stout, et al. (1943, pp. 98-106), includes a comprehensive bibliography of the literature through 1942. Evidence for four major stages of drainage with intervening glacial stages has been recognized in Ohio by Stout, et al. (1938; 1943). These stages have been summarized in columns 1-4, table 1. According to these writers (1938, pp. 66, 73, 76, 81; 1943, pp. 63, 83, 87, 96), all of the stages are represented in the Hocking Valley. The Hocking Valley chronology and the evidence presented by Stout and his co-workers for the several stages in Hocking County are included in columns 5-9, table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Year Permit Compliance Report for Corridor D WAS-50-4.40 (PID 23565)
    Fourth Year Permit Compliance Report For Corridor D WAS-50-4.40 (PID 23565) Fourth Year Monitoring Davis Creek Relocations USACE Permit: UN Trib Davis Creek-200400265 Prepared by 1980 West Broad Street Columbus, Ohio 43223 January, 2012 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Methods………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 2 Fourth Year Monitoring Results…………….………………………………………………………………….. 3 QHEI and HHEI……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Water Quality and Hydrology………………………………………………………………………… 3 Native Vegetation………..………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Table 1. QHEI and HHEI scores……………………………………………………………………….. 5 Table 2. Water Quality……………………………………………………………………………………. 5 Permit Compliance Summary and Contingency Plan..……………………………………………….. 6 Davis Creek and its Unnamed Tributary…………………………………………………………. 6 Conservation Easement East Branch Little Hocking River…………………………..….. 6 Conservation Easement Unnamed Tributary Goss Fork…………………………………. 7 Literature Cited…………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 Appendix A: Figures Figure 1. Corridor D Interchange Location Map (USGS Topographic) Figure 2. Corridor D Interchange Location Map (Aerial) Figure 3. Conservation Easement Unnamed Tributary Goss Fork (USGS Topographic) Figure 4. As built drawings for stream relocations after construction Figure 5. Stream relocations as surveyed in 2010. Figure 6. Vegetation Map showing Community Types Figure 7. 2011 Aerial Photograph of the Relocated Portions of Davis Creek and the Unnamed Tributary to Davis Creek Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • A HISTORY of BELPRE Washington County, Ohio
    A HISTORY OF BELPRE Washington County, Ohio -By- C. E. DICKINSON, D. D. Formerly Pastor of Congregational Church Author of the History of the First Congregational Church Marietta, Ohio PUBUIBHID FOR THB AUTHOR BY GLOBE PRINTING & BINDING COMPANY PARKRRSBURG. WEST VIRGINIA Copyrighted in 1920 by C. E. DICKINSON DEDICATED To the Belpre Historical Society with the hope that it will increase its efficiency and keep alive the interest of the people in the prosperity of their own community. FOREWORD The history of a township bears a similar relation to the history of a nation that the biography of an indi­ vidual bears to the record of human affairs. Occasionally an individual accomplishes a work which becomes an essential and abiding influence in the history of the world. Such persons however are rare, although a considerable number represent events which are important in the minds of relatives and friends. The story of only a few townships represents great historic events, but ac­ counts of the transactions in many localities are of im­ portance to the present and future residents of the place. Belpre township is only a small spot on the map of Ohio and a smaller speck on the map of the United* States. Neither is this locality celebrated for the transaction of many events of world-wide importance; at the same time the early history of Belpre exerted an influence on the well being of the State which makes an interesting stqpy for the descendants of the pioneers and other residents of the township. Within a very few months of the arrival of the first settlers at Mariettapfchey began to look for the most favorable places to locate jtheir homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Ohio Trail
    Along The Ohio Trail A Short History of Ohio Lands Dear Ohioan, Meet Simon, your trail guide through Ohio’s history! As the 17th state in the Union, Ohio has a unique history that I hope you will find interesting and worth exploring. As you read Along the Ohio Trail, you will learn about Ohio’s geography, what the first Ohioan’s were like, how Ohio was discovered, and other fun facts that made Ohio the place you call home. Enjoy the adventure in learning more about our great state! Sincerely, Keith Faber Ohio Auditor of State Along the Ohio Trail Table of Contents page Ohio Geography . .1 Prehistoric Ohio . .8 Native Americans, Explorers, and Traders . .17 Ohio Land Claims 1770-1785 . .27 The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 . .37 Settling the Ohio Lands 1787-1800 . .42 Ohio Statehood 1800-1812 . .61 Ohio and the Nation 1800-1900 . .73 Ohio’s Lands Today . .81 The Origin of Ohio’s County Names . .82 Bibliography . .85 Glossary . .86 Additional Reading . .88 Did you know that Ohio is Hi! I’m Simon and almost the same distance I’ll be your trail across as it is up and down guide as we learn (about 200 miles)? Our about the land we call Ohio. state is shaped in an unusual way. Some people think it looks like a flag waving in the wind. Others say it looks like a heart. The shape is mostly caused by the Ohio River on the east and south and Lake Erie in the north. It is the 35th largest state in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Settlement of Late Woodland and Late
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL SETTLEMENT OF LATE WOODLAND AND LATE PREHISTORIC TRIBAL COMMUNITIES IN THE HOCKING RIVER WATERSHED, OHIO A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Joseph E. Wakeman August 2003 This thesis entitled ARCHAEOLOGICAL SETTLEMENT OF LATE WOODLAND AND LATE PREHISTORIC TRIBAL COMMUNITIES IN THE HOCKING RIVER WATERSHED, OHIO BY JOSEPH E. WAKEMAN has been approved for the Program of Environmental Studies and the College of Arts and Sciences Elliot Abrams Professor of Sociology and Anthropology Leslie A. Flemming Dean, College of Arts and Sciences WAKEMAN, JOSEPH E. M.S. August 2003. Environmental Archaeology Archaeological Settlement of Late Woodland and Late Prehistoric Tribal Communities in the Hocking River Watershed, Ohio ( 72 pp.) Director of Thesis: Elliot Abrams Abstract The settlement patterns of prehistoric communities in the Hocking valley is poorly understood at best. Specifically, the Late Woodland (LW) (ca. A.D. 400 – A.D. 1000) and the Late Prehistoric (LP) (ca. A.D. 1000 – A.D. 1450) time periods present interesting questions regarding settlement. These two periods include significant changes in food subsistence, landscape utilization and population increases. Furthermore, it is unclear as to which established archaeological taxonomic units apply to these prehistoric tribal communities in the Hocking valley, if any. This study utilizes the extensive OAI electronic inventory to identify settlement patterns of these time periods in the Hocking River Watershed. The results indicate that landform selection for habitation by these prehistoric communities does change over time. The data suggest that environmental constraint, population increases and subsistence changes dictate the selection of landforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluvial Sediment in Hocking River Subwatershed 1 (North Branch Hunters Run), Ohio
    Fluvial Sediment in Hocking River Subwatershed 1 (North Branch Hunters Run), Ohio GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1798-1 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service Fluvial Sediment in Hocking River Subwatershed 1 (North Branch Hunters Run), Ohio By RUSSELL F. FLINT SEDIMENTATION IN SMALL DRAINAGE BASINS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1798-1 Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 71-190388 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 30 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-2153 CONTENTS Page Abstract __________________ U Introduction __________ -- 1 Acknowledgments ___ __ 2 Description of the area __ - 3 Elevations and slopes __ ________ 4 Soils and land use ___________ 4 Geology ___________________ 4 Climate __________________ 5 Hydraulic structures _____________ 5 Runoff _________________________________ __ 9 Fluvial sediment ________________ 12 Suspended sediment _____________ 13 Deposited sediment ___________ 19 Sediment yield ______________ 19 Trap efficiency of reservoir 1 _____________ - 21 Conclusions _____________________________________ 21 References _______________________________-- 22 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Map of Hocking River subwatershed 1 (North Branch Hunters Run) __________________________ 13 2-6. Photographs showing 2. Upstream face of detention structure . 6 3. Reservoir 1 ______ 6 4. Minor floodwater-retarding structure R3 7 5. Minor sediment-control structure S4 7 6. Outflow conduit of reservoir 1.___ 13 7. Trilinear diagram showing percentage of sand, silt, and clay in suspended-sediment samples of inflow and out­ flow, reservoir 1 ___________-_____ 15 TABLES Page TABLE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Basin Descriptions and Flow Characteristics of Ohio Streams
    Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water BASIN DESCRIPTIONS AND FLOW CHARACTERISTICS OF OHIO STREAMS By Michael C. Schiefer, Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Bulletin 47 Columbus, Ohio 2002 Robert Taft, Governor Samuel Speck, Director CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………… 1 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………. 2 Purpose and Scope ……………………………………………………………. 2 Previous Studies……………………………………………………………….. 2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………… 3 Factors Determining Regimen of Flow………………………………………………... 4 Weather and Climate…………………………………………………………… 4 Basin Characteristics...………………………………………………………… 6 Physiology…….………………………………………………………… 6 Geology………………………………………………………………... 12 Soils and Natural Vegetation ..………………………………………… 15 Land Use...……………………………………………………………. 23 Water Development……………………………………………………. 26 Estimates and Comparisons of Flow Characteristics………………………………….. 28 Mean Annual Runoff…………………………………………………………... 28 Base Flow……………………………………………………………………… 29 Flow Duration…………………………………………………………………. 30 Frequency of Flow Events…………………………………………………….. 31 Descriptions of Basins and Characteristics of Flow…………………………………… 34 Lake Erie Basin………………………………………………………………………… 35 Maumee River Basin…………………………………………………………… 36 Portage River and Sandusky River Basins…………………………………….. 49 Lake Erie Tributaries between Sandusky River and Cuyahoga River…………. 58 Cuyahoga River Basin………………………………………………………….. 68 Lake Erie Tributaries East of the Cuyahoga River…………………………….. 77 Ohio River Basin………………………………………………………………………. 84
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands in Teays-Stage Valleys in Extreme Southeastern Ohio: Formation and Flora
    ~ Symposium on Wetlands of th'e Unglaclated Appalachian Region West Virginia University, Margantown, W.Va., May 26-28, 1982 Wetlands in Teays-stage Valleys in Extreme Southeastern Ohio: Formation and Flora David ., M. Spooner 1 Ohio Department of Natural Resources Fountain Square, Building F Columbus, Ohio 43224 ABSTRACT. A vegetational survey was conducted of Ohio wetlands within an area drained by the preglacial Marietta River (the main tributary of the Teays River in southeastern Ohio) and I along other tributaries of the Teays River to the east of the present-day Scioto River and south of the Marietta River drainage. These wetlands are underlain by a variety of poorly drained sediments, including pre-Illinoian lake silts, Wisconsin lake silts, Wisconsin glacial outwash, and recent alluvium. A number of rare Ohio species occur in these wetlands. They include I Potamogeton pulcher, Potamogeton tennesseensis, Sagittaria australis, Carex debilis var. debilis, Carex straminea, Wo(f(ia papu/({era, P/atanthera peramoena, Hypericum tubu/osum, Viola lanceo/ata, Viola primu/({o/ia, HO/lonia in/lata, Gratio/a virginiana, Gratiola viscidu/a var shortii and Utriculariagibba. In Ohio, none of thesewetlandsexist in their natural state. ~ They have become wetter in recent years due to beaver activity. This beaver activity is creating J open habitats that may be favorable to the increase of many of the rare species. The wetlandsare also subject to a variety of destructive influences, including filling, draining, and pollution from adjacent strip mines. All of the communities in these wetlands are secondary. J INTRODUCTION Natural Resources, Division of Natural Areas and Preserves, 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • SUNDAY CREEK WATERSHED Generated by Non-Point Source Monitoring System
    2008 NPS REPORT SUNDAY CREEK WATERSHED Generated by Non-Point Source Monitoring System www.watersheddata.com • The Sunday Creek Watershed Group emerged from local residents’ concerns for the health of the Sunday Creek. Currently, we are a project of Rural Action. The Sunday Creek Watershed group office is located on 69 High St. Glouster Ohio 45732. The phone number is 740-767- 2225 and our web page is http://www.sunday- creek.org. Our most active partners are: Ohio Department of Natural Resources the divisions of Mineral Resource Management and Soil and Water Conservation; Ohio Environmental Pro- tection Agency; Office of Surface Mining; Ohio University; ILGARD; Hocking College; Trimble and Miller School District; Rural Action’s Envi- ronmental Learning Program and Sustainable Forestry; Local Village Councils; Local Township Trustees; Little Cities of Black Diamonds; Buck- eye Trail Group; Moose Lodge; Wayne National Forest; Burr Oak State Park. • Our mission statement, as adopted by the Sunday Creek Watershed Group in 2000; “The Sunday Creek Watershed Group is commit- ted to restoring and preserving water quality through community interaction, conservation, and education; in pursuit of a healthy ecosys- tem capable of supporting bio-diversity and recreation.” • The Sunday Creek Watershed is located in the Appalachian foothills, in the unglaciated part of Ohio. It is mostly rural with many small vil- lages throughout, and the majority of the land is privately owned. The Sunday creek watershed starts in the East Branch, north of Rendville and the West Branch at Shawnee. The creek follows SR 13 through Corning, Glouster, Millfield and it goes into the Hocking River right in Chaunc- ey.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bulleted/Pictorial History of Ohio University
    A Bulleted/Pictorial History of Ohio University Dr. Robert L. Williams II (BSME OU 1984), Professor Mechanical Engineering, Ohio University © 2020 Dr. Bob Productions [email protected] www.ohio.edu/mechanical-faculty/williams Ohio University’s Cutler Hall, 1818, National Historical Landmark ohio.edu/athens/bldgs/cutler Ohio University’s College Edifice flanked by East and West Wings circa 1840 (current Cutler Hall flanked by Wilson and McGuffey Halls) ohiohistorycentral.org 2 Ohio University History, Dr. Bob Table of Contents 1. GENERAL OHIO UNIVERSITY HISTORY .................................................................................. 3 1.1 1700S ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 1800S ................................................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 1900S ............................................................................................................................................... 13 1.4 2000S ............................................................................................................................................... 42 1.5 OHIO UNIVERSITY PRESIDENTS ........................................................................................................ 44 2. OHIO UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING COLLEGE HISTORY .................................................. 50 2.1 OHIO UNIVERSITY ENGINEERING HISTORY,
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Habitat Structure and the Distribution of Rare and Common Darters in Ohio
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2011 An Evaluation of Habitat Structure and the Distribution of Rare and Common Darters in Ohio Erin Lee Kingdom Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Biology Commons Repository Citation Kingdom, Erin Lee, "An Evaluation of Habitat Structure and the Distribution of Rare and Common Darters in Ohio" (2011). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 466. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/466 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EVALUATION OF HABITAT STRUCTURE AND THE DISTRIBUTION OF RARE AND COMMON DARTERS IN OHIO A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science By ERIN LEE KINGDOM B.S., Wright State University, 2004 2011 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES June 20, 2011 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Erin L. Kingdom ENTITLED An Evaluation of Habitat Structure and the Distribution of Rare and Common Darters in Ohio BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Science Yvonne Vadeboncoeur, Ph.D. Thesis Director David Goldstein, Ph. D. Department Chair of Biological Sciences Committee on Final Examination Yvonne Vadeboncoeur, Ph.D. James Runkle, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]