Manhattanisms Gallery Guide # Sh Arin G M O Vem En T @Storefrontnyc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
@storefrontnyc #sharingmovement Gallery Guide #manhattanisms Sharing July 15 — Models — September 2, Manhattanisms 2016 We are experiencing the emergence of a culture that is marked by a return to, redefinition, and expansion of the notion of the commons. The increasing complexity and interconnectedness of globalization is reorienting us away from trends that have emphasized individuation and singular development, and toward new forms of collectivity. Over the last decade, emerging technologies and economies have affected aspects of our everyday life, from the way we work and travel, to how we think about shelter and social engagement. How will the sharing movement of today affect the way we inhabit and build the cities of tomorrow? Manhattan, one of the most dense and iconic places in the world, has been a laboratory for many visions of urbanism. Sharing Models: Manhattanisms invites 30 international architects to produce models of their own visions for the city’s future. The models, each a section of Manhattan, establish analytical, conceptual, and physical frameworks for inhabiting and constructing urban space and the public sphere. Together, they present a composite figure; a territory that is simultaneously fictional and real, and one that opens a window to new perceptions of the city’s shared assets. MODELS AND DRAWINGS 01 — Future Firm 15 — T+E+A+M Where the Borough Ends Rummage 02 — The Open Workshop 16 — MODU Peer-to-Pier Living Outside the Dome 03 — June-14 Meyer-Grohbrügge & 17 — ODA Chermayeff Sharing is Caring(?) freud unlimited, again 18 — SITU Studio 04 — Matilde Cassani | Caterina Section 581 Spadonia 19 — RICA* | Iñaqui Carnicero + Fort Tyron Park center Lorena Del Río for rituals The Golden Loop 05 — Pedro&Juana 20 — Asymptote Architecture ShaMBuF [Sharing Marring Deep_Future Bubble Flaring] Manhattan Sky_Lattice 06 — MAIO 21 — Atelier Manferdini SHARING METABOLISM The Sixth Burrow A Speculative Policy for Manhattan 22 — Archi-Tectonics UN_CRAMMING: Re-Visiting 07 — LEVENBETTS the Midtown Rezoning GAME ON! 23 — nARCHITECTS 08 — Tatiana Bilbao Estudio + Key Party: City as Home Rodolfo Díaz Cervantes Magnetic Fields 24 — SO – IL Noah’s Ark 09 — FOAM Interfacing Absorption 25 — Leong Leong A City for the Newer Age 10 — Manuel Herz Architects City of Things 26 — Dror New Rock: Terra Era 11 — TEN Arquitectos Geology/Topography/ 27 — Bureau V Territory/Density NOZI OH 12 — Huff + Gooden Architects 28 — Höweler + Yoon Spook or Architecture and Reserve Buoyancy Imitation of Life 29 — Urban Agency 13 — Büro Koray Duman Super-urbia New Babylon 2.0 30 — Renato Rizzi/IUAV 14 — SCHAUM/SHIEH InvisibHole Beyond The Totems GALLERY PLAN 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 02 04 06 08 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 FACADE INSTALLATIONS As part of Sharing Models: Manhattanisms, five artists have been invited to produce stencils that ask us to reflect upon the sharing movement. The facade of Storefront will be transformed into a canvas that presents one artist’s work each week throughout the duration of the show. The first 100 visitors to Storefront’s gallery space will receive a stencil of the work being shown. Participating artists include Curtis Kulig, John Giorno, Lawrence Weiner, Sebastian ErraZuriz, and Shantell Martin. Jul. 14 — Curtis Kulig We Love We Share Jul. 28 — John Giorno Sit On My Heart And Laugh Aug. 4 — Lawrence Weiner MY HOUSE IS YOUR HOUSE YOUR HOUSE IS MY HOUSE WHEN YOU SHIT ON THE FLOOR IT GETS ON YOUR FEET Aug. 11 — Sebastian ErraZuriz Something Worth Sharing Aug. 18 — Shantell Martin Share 01 Where the Borough Ends Where the Borough Ends — Future Firm Sharing Models: Manhattanisms, 2016. Storefront for Art and Architecture. In 1939, when the Bronx Borough Manhattan’s northern edge has been President, James Lyons, planted a flag shaped and reshaped, cataloging New on Manhattan’s Marble Hill and deemed it York’s evolving ambitions in its changing “Bronx Sudetenland,” referring to the Nazi forms. The waterway has been recon- annexation of regions of Czechoslovakia, figured from swirling eddies in the 17th he may have exaggerated the degree of century, before settlement by Europeans; conflict. Nonetheless, this moment marks to the wadeable Spuyten Duyvil Creek; one of many episodes in the conflicted to the severing of the landmass by the history of Manhattan’s northern border, a Harlem Ship Canal in 1895; and finally, to line bounded by the east-west waterway the filling-in of the river north of Marble that separates the borough from the Hill in 1915. mainland. However, this so-called “natural” border is far from static. Over centuries, 01 T—@FutureFirm Future Firm Where the Borough Ends investigates and city services, including the fire this liminal zone at Manhattan’s northern department, police department, and EMS, edge, including its episodic reconfigu- all hail from the Bronx. ration. It renders visible the paradox of how we think about natural landmarks Beyond New York, consider for example, as fixed demarcations—a Chinese the recurring border disputes resulting word for “border” still comprises the from the shifting of the Rio Grande at character for “river”—when they, in fact, the Mexican-US border, resulting in both are transformed at the same speed as arbitration and re-channeling of the river. urban change. Instead of showing a single Or the shifting of the Sham Chun River iteration of Manhattan’s northern edge, between Hong Kong and Shenzhen, which this sand-and-water model represents once—when its course was corrected to infinite possibilities for the divide. Viewers respond to flooding—also allocated more get their hands dirty and shape the territory to the S.A.R. collectively. These terrain between the two boroughs by are symptoms of a long shift from the molding the model’s scale landscape. An perception of landforms and waterways overlaid projection responds in live-time, as immutable wilderness, toward the extending Manhattan’s grid south and the contemporary understanding of urban Bronx’s urbanism north. Data points on and landscape edges to be perpetually the model’s sides serve as reference for changing, bureaucratically-defined, and historical datums of elevation, water level, up for reconsideration. Today, a group and average housing prices. called “The Great and Glorious Grand Army of The Bronx” performatively Where the Borough Ends aims to provoke re-enact Lyons’ flag planting annually, broader questions about how political- defending against what they consider ly-configured landscape forms often Manhattan’s “spoiled ramblings of the result in “shared” liminal territories of effete bourgeois.” both conflict and coordination. Currently, Marble Hill—the vestigial neighborhood on the North American mainland but legislatively remaining in Manhattan— represents a “shared” territory that is the urban legacy of the fluctuating border. Marble Hill residents vote for the offices of Manhattan Assemblyman, City Councilman, and Borough President, and are called for Manhattan jury duty, yet their school board representatives 02 Peer-to-Pier Peer-to-Pier — The Open Workshop Sharing Models: Manhattanisms, 2016. Storefront for Art and Architecture. If sharing requires a common collective difference into the grid itself. By not realm, it also necessitates difference in assimilating into the grid, Broadway that each person or constituency offers instead creates a series of public spaces a unique resource to be shared. At the from the anomalous parcels it forms as core of sharing, we find Hannah Arendt’s it crosses the grid. Similarly, in the far definition of human plurality as a dialec- northern reaches of Manhattan, Inwood is tical condition between our collective one of the few neighborhoods that have and individual desires. Nowhere else is not assimilated into the collective grid. this relationship so clearly depicted as in With few access points, it sits in isolation. the grid of Manhattan—which provides a Curiously, its urban grid ascribes to collective armature that enables unique Broadway’s trajectory, eliminating expression. While this difference is difference, and therefore the production typically situated in the interior of the of parcels that resist commodification. block, the avenue of Broadway inserts 02 I—@theopenworkshop The Open Workshop Topography and infrastructure have while animals are able to roam freely. At subdivided Inwood into three islands: the scale of the city, we propose that Inwood Hill Park; a series of consistent newly programmed subway cars leverage housing blocks; and a parking/mainte- the network of connectivity throughout nance train yard for the New York City the boroughs. From shared art galleries, Subway. Within this compressed swatch, libraries, markets, and gyms, the subway we see three distinct and critical pieces can distribute programs to particu- of Manhattan: its relationship with and larly underserved communities. While romanticisation of nature, its typological the train yard currently separates the development of domestic space, and its neighborhood from the Harlem River as lifeblood, the subway. a parking lot for subway cars, it can now provide Inwood with a wide selection of Our proposal recognizes that sharing amenities not being used by the larger is also a dialectic condition, requiring city. Trapped between the park and train clear delineation between the public yard is a series of housing blocks that and the private as well as the collective primarily consist of the letter-types “H,” and the individual. Furthermore, we “T,” “C,” and “I.” By addressing these contend that sharing emerges at different typologies from within the domestic scales of association—from the territory environment, we can alter over sixty of the island of Manhattan, the neigh- percent of the housing on the site. borhood, and domestic spaces. Our Renegotiating the public/private realm proposal begins by creating a common within these types, we have eliminated neighborhood datum of access, which private restrooms, kitchens, and living is aligned with the collective grid of rooms, and have consolidated larger Manhattan.