DOCSLIB.ORG

MI5 Accused of Covering up Sexual Abuse at Boys’ Home”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MI5 Accused of Covering up Sexual Abuse at Boys’ Home” Networked Knowledge Media Reports Networked Knowledge Abuse Cases Homepage This page setup by Dr Robert N Moles [Underlining where it occurs is for editorial emphasis] On 16 February 2015 Vikram Dodd and Richard Norton-Taylor of The Guardian reported “MI5 accused of covering up sexual abuse at boys’ home” Court case to address alleged cover-up of British state involvement at the Kincora children’s home in Northern Ireland. Gary Hoy, an alleged victim at the Kincora home, says the security services should not be allowed to hide the facts. MI5 is facing allegations it was complicit in the sexual abuse of children, the high court in Northern Ireland will hear on Tuesday. Victims of the abuse are taking legal action to force a full independent inquiry with the power to compel witnesses to testify and the security service to hand over documents. The case, in Belfast, is the first in court over the alleged cover-up of British state involvement at the Kincora children’s home in Northern Ireland in the 1970s. It is also the first of the recent sex abuse cases allegedly tying in the British state directly. Victims allege that the cover-up over Kincora has lasted decades. The victims want the claims of state collusion investigated by an inquiry with full powers, such as the one set up into other sex abuse scandals chaired by the New Zealand judge Lowell Goddard. Amnesty International branded Kincora “one of the biggest scandals of our age” and backed the victims’ calls for an inquiry with full powers: “There are longstanding claims that MI5 blocked one or more police investigations into Kincora in the 1970s in order to protect its own intelligence-gathering operation, a terrible indictment which raises the spectre of countless vulnerable boys having faced further years of brutal abuse. “It’s only Justice Goddard’s inquiry that will be able to ensure that evidence doesn’t remain hidden in Whitehall filing cabinets and that even senior politicians will have to attend the inquiry.” Children are alleged to have suffered sustained sexual abuse after being taken from the east Belfast children’s home, run by a member of a Protestant paramilitary organisation, to be offered to men. Lawyers for the victims will argue in court that “there is credible evidence (and it is therefore arguable) that the security forces and security services were aware of the abuse, permitted it to continue and colluded in protecting the individuals involved from investigation or prosecution”, according to papers lodged with the Belfast high court. One alleged victim, Gary Hoy, said in a sworn affidavit seen by the Guardian: “If we had had a proper inquiry in the 1980s then I wouldn’t have to relive this again today. MI5 and MI6 cannot be allowed to hide things, and I believe everything needs to be brought out into the open. I find it heart-wrenching that there were security men could have been behind the abuse or involved in it … Because they were in positions of authority or supposed to be protecting the state they get away with it.” Hoy was placed in Kincora with his younger brother in the 1970s. He says the abuse left him broken as an adult. At the court case this week, lawyers for Hoy will state that “he (and other individuals) suffered abuse whilst in the care of Kincora boys’ home which would come within the definition of torture, or inhuman or degrading treatment as defined under article 3 of the ECHR [European convention on human rights]”. Two former British military officials say a full inquiry with proper powers should take place. One says MI5 was complicit in the abuses; another says he reported it to MI5 but no action was taken. Colin Wallace, a former army information officer in Northern Ireland, said: “There is now irrefutable evidence that previous inquiries were deliberately engineered or manipulated to mislead parliament by concealing the role of government agencies in covering up the abuses.” The demand for an inquiry with full powers was supported last week by parliament’s home affairs committee. The government wants the allegations covered by a different inquiry which lacks the powers to compel MI5 to hand over documents and cannot compel witnesses to testify. The government’s preferred option will not fund lawyers for the victims. Three men were jailed for their part in abuse at Kincora in 1981, but attempts to establish the truth about British state involvement have been blocked. It has persistently been alleged that William McGrath, Kincora’s housemaster and the leader of an extreme evangelical Protestant group called Tara, was an informant for British intelligence. McGrath was jailed for sexual offences in 1981 and is now dead. There have been limited inquiries into Kincora, but officers of the former Royal Ulster Constabulary, army intelligence officers, a former Northern Ireland ombudsman, and the judges conducting those earlier inquiries all said the truth about what went on there – and why it was allowed to continue for so many years – had been suppressed. RUC officers were repeatedly refused permission in the 1980s to interview a senior MI5 official about the affair. The Home Office, the government department responsible for MI5, declined to say if any intelligence official had ever even been questioned about the claims. It also declined to confirm or deny if the allegations of MI5 complicity in the abuse of children were true or a maligning of the security service’s reputation. A Home Office spokesperson said: “The government is cooperating fully with all investigations into allegations relating to the Kincora boys’ home. It is not appropriate to comment further while these investigations are under way.” In his affidavit, Hoy said: “Joe Mains, who was jailed for offences in the 1980s, he had a room in a [portable building]. His door was always closed, and I remember well-dressed men used to go in with children and the door was locked. Joe Mains took me to a house in Four Winds and abused me, and a man called Semple [also convicted] took me to a house in the Fortwilliam area and abused me.” Lawyers acting for Hoy and other alleged victims want judges to declare the government’s planned inquiry is inadequate. They are seeking leave to judicially review the government’s decision. The allegations of security service complicity in the abuses at Kincora have been reported by news organisations in Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic for decades. Kevin Winters, the solicitor for Hoy and other victims of Kincora, said they viewed the government’s proposed inquiry as offering little hope of delivering the justice they had waited so long for: “They see this as a continuation of the cover-up that has existed for decades. They deserve full closure and justice.” The allegations of British state complicity in the abuse of children initially appeared to be a conspiracy theory. But detectives who investigated Kincora in the 1980s said at least one Tory MP visited the home at the time boys were being sexually abused there. Brian Gemmell, a former army intelligence officer, has said he was warned off his investigations into Kincora by an MI5 officer. Among the first to accuse the Ministry of Defence and MI5 of a cover-up was the former army information officer Wallace, who was himself the victim of dirty tricks, and subsequently left the MoD. In 1980, as more people began to take notice of his claims about Kincora, Wallace was arrested and convicted of manslaughter. He spent six years in jail amid suggestions he had been framed. His conviction for manslaughter was quashed in 1996 in the light of fresh forensic evidence and shortcomings at his trial. In 1990, Margaret Thatcher was forced to admit that her government had deceived parliament and the public about Wallace’s role. An independent investigation by David Calcutt QC had found that members of MI5 had interfered with disciplinary proceedings against Wallace. As a result, Wallace was awarded £30,000 compensation. He told the Guardian: “Surely some action must be taken against those whose actions deliberately perpetuated the cover-up of the abuses and thus prolonged the suffering of the victims unnecessarily.” The chair of the current inquiry, Sir Anthony Hart, has asked all UK government departments and agencies to provide him with every file they held on Kincora. A spokesperson for the inquiry declined to elaborate when asked what response Hart had made to his demand. However, Theresa May, the home secretary, has told Hart and the Northern Ireland secretary, Theresa Villiers, that “all officials, government departments and agencies will give their fullest cooperation”. This, she added in a letter seen by the Guardian, “includes the security service [MI5] and the Ministry of Defence”. May said that if necessary she would place the Kincora allegations into the hands of the England and Wales child sexual abuse panel inquiry under Judge Goddard. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/feb/15/mi5-kincora-childrens-home-northwen- ireland-sexual-abuse?CMP=share_btn_fb .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilson, MI5 and the Rise of Thatcher Covert Operations in British Politics 1974-1978 Foreword
    • Forward by Kevin McNamara MP • An Outline of the Contents • Preparing the ground • Military manoeuvres • Rumours of coups • The 'private armies' of 1974 re-examined • The National Association for Freedom • Destabilising the Wilson government 1974-76 • Marketing the dirt • Psy ops in Northern Ireland • The central role of MI5 • Conclusions • Appendix 1: ISC, FWF, IRD • Appendix 2: the Pinay Circle • Appendix 3: FARI & INTERDOC • Appendix 4: the Conflict Between MI5 and MI6 in Northern Ireland • Appendix 5: TARA • Appendix 6: Examples of political psy ops targets 1973/4 - non Army origin • Appendix 7 John Colin Wallace 1968-76 • Appendix 8: Biographies • Bibliography Introduction This is issue 11 of The Lobster, a magazine about parapolitics and intelligence activities. Details of subscription rates and previous issues are at the back. This is an atypical issue consisting of just one essay and various appendices which has been researched, written, typed, printed etc by the two of us in less than four months. Its shortcomings should be seen in that light. Brutally summarised, our thesis is this. Mrs Thatcher (and 'Thatcherism') grew out of a right-wing network in this country with extensive links to the military-intelligence establishment. Her rise to power was the climax of a long campaign by this network which included a protracted destabilisation campaign against the Liberal and Labour Parties - chiefly the Labour Party - during 1974-6. We are not offering a conspiracy theory about the rise of Mrs Thatcher, but we do think that the outlines of a concerted campaign to discredit the other parties, to engineer a right-wing leader of the Tory Party, and then a right-wing government, is visible.
    [Show full text]
  • How New Is New Loyalism?
    HOW NEW IS NEW LOYALISM? CATHERINE MCGLYNN EUROPEAN STUDIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD SALFORD, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page 1 Chapter One Hypothesis and Methodology Page 6 Chapter Two Literature Review: Unionism, Loyalism, Page 18 New Loyalism Chapter Three A Civic Loyalism? Page 50 Chapter Four The Roots of New Loyalism 1966-1982 Page 110 Chapter Five New Loyalism and the Peace Process Page 168 Chapter Six New Loyalism and the Progressive Page 205 Unionist Party Chapter Seven Conclusion: How New is New Loyalism? Page 279 Bibliography Page 294 ABBREVIATONS CLMC Combined Loyalist Military Command DENI Department of Education for Northern Ireland DUP Democratic Unionist Party IOO Independent Orange Order IRA Irish Republican Army LAW Loyalist Association of Workers LVF Loyalist Volunteer Force NICRA Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association NIHE Northern Ireland Housing Executive NILP Northern Ireland Labour Party PUP Progressive Unionist Party RHC Red Hand Commandos RHD Red Hand Defenders SDLP Social Democratic and Labour Party UDA Ulster Defence Association UDP Ulster Democratic Party UDLP Ulster Democratic and Loyalist Party UFF Ulster Freedom Fighters UUP Ulster Unionist Party UUUC United Ulster Unionist Council UWC Ulster Workers' Council UVF Ulster Volunteer Force VPP Volunteer Political Party ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my PhD supervisor, Jonathan Tonge for all his support during my time at Salford University. I am also grateful to all the staff at the Northern Irish Political collection at the Linen Hall Library in Belfast for their help and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Covert Action
    • 'Privatising' covert action: the case of the Unification Church • Wallace on Pincher on Wallace • Western Goals (UK) • Publications: • Books: The Dirty War and The SAS in Ireland : • The Terrorism Industry • Miscellaneous Publications Lobster is Robin Ramsay (0482 447558) and Steven Dorril (0484 681388). All written correspondence should be sent to Lobster 214 Westbourne Avenune, Hull, HU5 3JB. UK Lobster receives no subsidy other than the occasional generosity of its readers. Contributors to this Lobster are • Jeffrey Bale, who used to edit Maximum Rock and Roll and is currently finishing a PhD at the University of California; • Mike Hughes, who is a Leeds-based free-lance journalist and researcher; • David Teacher, a translator, researcher, author of a study of Tolstoy, and Lobster's European correspondent; • and Colin Wallace, who is in management eduacation. The photograph on the front cover is the copyright of the Unificationm Church and has been lifted from Covert Action Information Bulletin Previous Lobsters • 9, 10, 13, 14 are £1.25 each (UK); $3.00 (US/Canada); £2.00 (Europe, Australia, New Zealand) • 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 are £2.25 each (UK); $4.50 (US/Canada); £3.50 (Europe, Australia, New Zealand) • 19 is £4.50 (UK); $9.00 (US/Canada); £3.50 (Europe, Australasia) • The Special Issue is £5.50 (UK); $10.00 (US/Canada); £6.50 (Europe, Australasia) These prices incude postage -- airmail to overseas. NB. Outside the UK please send either International Money Orders, or cheques drawn on UK banks or cash. Orders to Lobster 214 Westbourne Avenune, Hull, HU5 3JB. UK 'Privatising' covert action: the case of the Unification Church Jeffrey M.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume I Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons Dated 15 June 2010 for The
    Report of the Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 15 June 2010 for the Report of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry The Rt Hon The Lord Saville of Newdigate (Chairman) Bloody Sunday Inquiry – Volume I Bloody Sunday Inquiry – Volume The Hon William Hoyt OC The Hon John Toohey AC Volume I Outline Table of Contents General Introduction Glossary Principal Conclusions and Overall Assessment Published by TSO (The Stationery Office) and available from: Online The Background to Bloody www.tsoshop.co.uk Mail, Telephone, Fax & E-mail Sunday TSO PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN Telephone orders/General enquiries: 0870 600 5522 Order through the Parliamentary Hotline Lo-Call: 0845 7 023474 Fax orders: 0870 600 5533 E-mail: [email protected] Textphone: 0870 240 3701 The Parliamentary Bookshop 12 Bridge Street, Parliament Square, London SW1A 2JX This volume is accompanied by a DVD containing the full Telephone orders/General enquiries: 020 7219 3890 Fax orders: 020 7219 3866 text of the report Email: [email protected] Internet: www.bookshop.parliament.uk TSO@Blackwell and other Accredited Agents Customers can also order publications from £572.00 TSO Ireland 10 volumes 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD not sold Telephone: 028 9023 8451 Fax: 028 9023 5401 HC29-I separately Return to an Address of the Honourable the House of Commons dated 15 June 2010 for the Report of the Bloody Sunday Inquiry The Rt Hon The Lord Saville of Newdigate (Chairman) The Hon William Hoyt OC The Hon John Toohey AC Ordered by the House of Commons
    [Show full text]
  • Witness Statement of Clifford Smyth
    KIN-4506 KIN-4507 KIN-4508 KIN-4509 230 block on an Army Intelligence officer from learning more ArrnRwono about McGrath and Kincora prevented the information from being passed on to the police ' ' ' and as we now know Everyone in Northern Ireland - people of all religions and there was a reason for wishing to keep the lid on Kincora' people the twenty-seven There has never been an enquiry into the political associ- of none - has suffered through ations of McGrath, to determine just who in British years of bloody conflict, whether bereavement, injury, the job Intelligence knew what about Tara, McGrath and his loss of a or an insult from strangers in a bar in Spain. dimmed. nefarious activities. Those who suffered in Kincora for the All have had their lives curtailed, their horizons intense that sake of a security operation deserve to hear the truth' For too many the suffering has been so They should not be regarded as expendable in order to the human heart can hardly cope with it. Against the protect those in authority who knew what was going on background of that grief and pain, the grim and mysteri- but did nothing. Those charged with protecting the ous figure of William McGrath is not Just an enigma but integrity of the state should be accountable for their an irony. actions and the government owes it to those abused in Here was a man who lived in the shadows, who shunned Kincora to make them accountable. In reality, there's more the light of day, who told his closest associates that he chance of my playing for Manchester United before the preferred to 'remain a backroom boy'.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gay View on Kincora Author(S): Sean Mcgouran Source: Fortnight, No
    Fortnight Publications Ltd. A Gay View on Kincora Author(s): Sean McGouran Source: Fortnight, No. 204 (May, 1984), p. 12 Published by: Fortnight Publications Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25547464 . Accessed: 31/03/2013 13:20 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Fortnight Publications Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Fortnight. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 86.174.204.174 on Sun, 31 Mar 2013 13:20:10 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions POLITICS - A GAYVIEW I EEC Election non-transferable the negative aspect, the continued from 11 failure to transfer, can also affect the out ON KINCORA page come of the election. Sean McGouran The rolling back of the progress made The significant factor in this analysis is by the DUP until 1981 has not received as that despite outward competition OUP/ much attention as the DUP voters transfer between the GAY PEOPLE have watched the of theKincora nationalist/repub heavily growth indutry lican the went to with fascinated horror. A number of sordid and petty crimes rivalry. But the DUP share of two parties: 80% of DUP transfers perpetrated against teenaged adults have been presented as vote has declined from 26.6% in 1981 to the OUP and 76% of OUP transfers went atrocities on a with par Bloody Sunday, Bloody Friday and every 23.0% in 1982, to 20.0% in 1983.
    [Show full text]
  • Collusion in the South Armagh / Mid Ulster Area in the Mid-1970'S
    Collusion in the South Armagh / Mid Ulster Area in the mid-1970's Collusion in the South Armagh / Mid Ulster Area in the mid- 1970's ● Silverbridge and Collusion in S. Armagh ● 'Permutations of the Same Gang'/List of Attacks ● List of Victims In 1998 the Pat Finucane Centre was approached by the families of three men who were killed in a Loyalist gun and bomb attack on Donnelly's Bar, Silverbridge on 19 December 1975. These families were seeking closure. In order to do so, they needed to know how much truth there was to rumours that have circulated in their area that collusion was suspected between Loyalist paramilitaries and members of the security forces in the attack in which they had lost their loved ones. Preliminary research pointed to the likelihood that there had indeed been collusion with members of the UVF in this case. Subsequently, a former RUC officer from the area approached the centre and his views about the allegations were heard. Furthermore, a Chief Superintendent currently serving at RUC headquarters agreed to a meeting with representatives of the PFC and members of the Silverbridge families. This meeting proved to be very significant. The Chief Superintendent was the investigating officer in the aftermath of the attack. The officer openly believed there had been collusion in the case - he stated that the perpetrators included one RUC Reservist and two UDR men, and the rest were Loyalist paramilitaries from the Portadown area. He stated that the families were unlikely to get justice in terms of prosecutions at this stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Whistle Blower
    38 REVIEWS Settling Old Scores The Cameron Diaries by Clyde government and economic manage­ Cameron claims that his aim in con­ Cameron. Allen and Unwin, 1990. ment did not help - nor did Gough stantly undermining Whitlam's Whitlam's insistence on standards far leadership - sometimes openly, often Hardback, rrp $49.95. Reviewed by more rigorous than those adopted by not - was based on a genuine convic­ Mungo MacCallum. any national government before or tion that Whitlam had become an ir­ since - but, after all, it was not the revocable liability for the party. The difficulty with Clyde government which perverted the Political rehabilitation was impossible Cameron's diaries is deciding composition of the Senate, or which and therefore amputation was the how much of them to believe. blocked Supply, or dismissed itself. only option. He glosses over the fact that, at the start of 1976, no one else - This is not because Cameron in­ not his favoured candidate Lionel dulges in fantasies or memory Bowen, not Bill Hayden, not even Bob lapses, as might have been the Hawke if a seat could have been found case had Sir William McMahon for him - wanted to take over the ever found a publisher for his leadership. There was simply no alter­ native to Whitlam. memoirs; it is because a large part of Cameron's reminiscence Cameron, however, refused to accept consists of gloating accounts of the inevitable, and spent the next two how he was able to deceive and years working against Whitlam. In mislead his colleagues. It is the this way his "genuine conviction" be- f-fulfillircame a self-fulfillingf-fulfillircame prophecy.
    [Show full text]
  • Psyops) Springs Directly from My Appreciation of the Wider Problems of Media Power That Were Inculcated in Me After I Found the Media Group in the Summer of 1985
    Citation for published version: Miller, D 2015, Sociology, propaganda and psychological operations. in M Dawson, B Fowler, D Miller & A Smith (eds), Stretching the Sociological Imagination: Essays in Honour of John Eldridge. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, U. K., pp. 163-188. Publication date: 2015 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication Reproduced with permission of Palgrave Macmillan'. This extract is taken from the author's original manuscript and has not been edited. The definitive, published, version of record is available here: http://www.palgrave.com/page/detail/stretching-the-sociological-imagination- matt-dawson/?isb=9781137493637 University of Bath Alternative formats If you require this document in an alternative format, please contact: [email protected] General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 9 Sociology, Propaganda and Psychological Operations David Miller Sociology has less to say about propaganda than it should and much less than it used to. Why is this? Can anything be done about it? Answering the first question is tricky but I will review some of the evidence. Amongst this is the fact that sociological attention has been diverted from propaganda in part by a successful (propaganda?) campaign to create alternatives to the term propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • American Irish Newsletter the Ri Ish American Community Collections
    Sacred Heart University DigitalCommons@SHU American Irish Newsletter The rI ish American Community Collections 8-1990 American Irish Newsletter - August 1990 American Ireland Education Foundation - PEC Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/irish_ainews Part of the European Languages and Societies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation American Ireland Education Foundation - PEC, "American Irish Newsletter - August 1990" (1990). American Irish Newsletter. Paper 137. http://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/irish_ainews/137 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the The rI ish American Community Collections at DigitalCommons@SHU. It has been accepted for inclusion in American Irish Newsletter by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@SHU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AMERICAN IRISH NEWSLETTER AMERICAN Irish Political Education Committee Volume 15, Number 8 August 1990 NEWS BITS by Kathy Regan (excerpts from ih& Andersonstown News, June 9, 1990) SPECIAL REPORT: PEC DELEGATION’S VISIT TO NORTHERN IRELAND “CONFERENCE TACKLES THE CHILL FACTOR” Sec American Delegation Visits Northern Ireland on page 4 On Saturday, June 9 representatives from oflicial government ATTENTION ALL MEMBERS — You are requested to bodies, trade unions, and politicai parties united in the after­ reproduce and distribute this report to as many people as noon session of the IS BELFAST WORKING conference to possible, including:
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Role of the Government in the Provision of Evidence to the Inquiry
    4. THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENT IN THE PROVISION OF EVIDENCE TO THE INQUIRY 4.1 Introduction and Summary of Submissions 4.1.1 The vast bulk of the documentary evidence received by the Inquiry has been provided by the Government. Apart from being the custodian of official documents, the Government is under a legal obligation by virtue of Article 2 of the European Convention to do everything in its power to ensure that the Inquiry into deaths and injuries caused by its servants and agents is both independent and effective. It is readily acknowledged that the Government has declared its willingness to cooperate fully with the Inquiry and to disclose all relevant material. It has supplied the Tribunal with a very substantial and wide-ranging body of information and documentation. The material provided includes documents that purport to be contemporaneous as well as documents that have been recently created. 4.1.2 However, the Tribunal has to evaluate this information and, as part of this process, it is obliged to determine whether it has indeed been given all the relevant available material and whether the material that has been provided is reliable. It also has to be satisfied that it is genuine. 4.1.3 In this context, we submit that: the Government (including in particular the MOD) and its agencies (including in particular the Security Service, Secret Intelligence Service and the RUC / PSNI) should be regarded as having a potential interest in protecting their former servants and agents, including in particular soldiers, civil servants, politicians and others involved either directly or indirectly in the events leading up to Bloody Sunday, the events on the day itself and relevant events thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Scraps of Empire
    1 SCRAPS OF EMPIRE Time did nothing to make the notion of uniting Ulster and Eire one whit more attractive to the Protestants of Ulster. Comparatively speaking, the Irish Republic was an economic flop. All the way up to 1970, it had the highest jobless rate in western Europe. Its GNP grew slower over the long term than any other country in Europe. Its income per head was the fourth lowest in Europe in the 1960s ... its house-building rate the lowest by far.1 Ulster wasn’t exactly the Taiwan of the western world itself. It took a Depression to teach it the prime lesson: diversify. You stick to the linen trade, and when the demand for linen goes down, the whole economy tumbles into a heap. But after World War II, Ulster coaxed light and heavy industry into the province. They offered financial grants and giveaways and tax advantages. 1 Patrick Riddell, Fire Over Ulster (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1970), 184-85. 2 By the end of the ‘60s, Ulster led the world in making man-made fibers. It was one of the great centers for the textile industry. You could find all the great firms that made synthetics with their factories in Ulster... Imperial Chemical Industries Courtaulds Du Pont Monsanto British Enkalon Hoechst The biggest single shipbuilding yard was in Ulster. ... the biggest graving-dock in the world, too.2 It wasn’t all smoking chimneys, granted. The Ulstermen made themselves into the best livestock farmers in the United Kingdom. All the same, Ulster employed just one worker in ten; in the Republic, it stayed at one in three.3 2 Patrick Riddell, Fire Over Ulster (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1970), 203.
    [Show full text]