DOCSLIB.ORG

DOE Quadrennial Energy Review 1.2, Electricity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DOE Quadrennial Energy Review 1.2, Electricity DOE Quadrennial Energy Review 1.2, Electricity: Generation to End Use – Stakeholder Meeting #6: Atlanta, Georgia on May 24, 2016 Written Statement of Doug Esamann - Duke Energy Opening Statement Duke Energy appreciates the opportunity to participate in the May 24, 2016 Quadrennial Energy Review (QER) 1.2 stakeholder meeting. I am Doug Esamann, Executive Vice President of Duke Energy with responsibility for our regulated utilities in Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky and Florida. In addition, my organization also supports the company’s grid solutions and modernization initiatives, many of which are topics of discussion in the QER. I welcome the opportunity to provide Duke Energy’s perspective during the May 24th Panel 1 discussion and in these written comments related to: “Bulk Power Generation and Transmission: How Can We Plan, Build, and Operate the Appropriate Amount for Future Needs?” This written statement expands on the Panel 1 discussion. It also offers suggestions in areas that DOE is addressing in its QER 1.2 effort, such as policy, legislation and research and development areas that we believe would be helpful to an energy industry in transition. Below is an outline of the written statement: • Executive Summary • Duke Energy Corporation Information • Duke Energy’s Road Ahead: o Transform the Customer Experience o Modernize the Power Grid o Generate Cleaner Energy o Engage Employees and Stakeholders • Duke Energy Examples of Solutions to Address our Challenges • Duke Energy’s Recommendations regarding: o Policy o Legislation o Research and Development • Attachments: o Attachment A - Presentation Slides o Attachment B - Duke Energy Storage Projects 1 Executive Summary • Duke Energy Corporation is one of the largest electric power holding companies in the United States (U.S.). • The supply of reliable, affordable electricity is critical to the economic vitality of our communities and states as well as our overall quality of life. For that reason, and because of the grid utilized to deliver our product to customers, the relationship and interactions of utilities and their customers have been highly regulated. In that regulated world, emphasis has been placed on reliability of supply, least cost options, an obligation to serve all customers, the need to treat all customers equally and fairly and the receipt of a fair rate of return by investors. The electric utility industry takes a long term view and utilities are generally not rewarded for risk taking. Policy issues find their way into the business via statutory and administrative requirements, incentives and penalties. • But the changing expectations of customers, emerging technologies and new energy economics are requiring the electric utility industry to rethink its business after operating under traditional cost-of-service regulation for more than a century. • Duke Energy has recently formulated a new strategy for our regulated business (e.g. our retail service states), which we call the Road Ahead, that will lead the way to cleaner, smarter energy solutions that customers value. Duke Energy’s Road Ahead strategy has four elements: transform the customer experience; modernize the power grid; generate cleaner energy; and engage employees and stakeholders. • Duke Energy is preparing our generation portfolio for a cleaner energy future and more flexible operations. Duke Energy has retired 40 coal units and invested in cleaner natural gas generation and renewables. These modernization efforts began more than a decade ago and will continue for years to come. As a result, Duke Energy’s generation from coal has decreased from about 58% in 2005 to about 35% in 2015 and has reduced overall carbon dioxide emissions by more than 28% in that same time period. • Diversity of generation sources will continue to play a critical role in meeting the future needs of our customers. While renewables and natural gas will be an increasing part of our generation portfolio, there will also be a need for generation resources and smart grid technologies that can complement the variable nature of renewable resources. • Duke Energy is ensuring that throughout this transformation, we remain committed to providing value to our customers while maintaining a focus on safety, reliability, affordability and environmental stewardship. Duke Energy is a recognized leader in safety and led the industry in safety in 2015. Duke Energy’s rates are lower than the national averages in all six states we serve and we have a reliability rate of 99.98 percent. • Duke Energy believes that the greatest value we can deliver to our customers in our regulated states results from the vertically integrated utility model which allows Duke Energy to optimize the complete value chain from power generation to delivery and service to our customers. Therefore, federal policies should support regional differences as well as not favor particular business models, but understand the value the different models provide for their customers in the various regions. 2 About Duke Energy Duke Energy is one of the largest electric power holding companies in the United States. Its regulated utility operations serve approximately 7.4 million electric customers located in six states in the Southeast and Midwest, representing a population of approximately 24 million people. Its Commercial Portfolio and International business segments own and operate diverse power generation assets in North America and Latin America, including a growing portfolio of renewable energy assets in the United States. Headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., Duke Energy is a S&P 100 Stock Index company traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DUK. More information about the company is available at duke-energy.com. Duke Energy’s Road Ahead Duke Energy has recently formulated a new strategy for our regulated business, which we call the Road Ahead. Duke Energy’s Road Ahead vision is to lead the way to cleaner, smarter energy solutions that customers value. Duke Energy believes that the greatest value we can deliver to our customers in our regulated states results from the vertically integrated utility model which allows Duke Energy to optimize the complete value chain from power generation to delivery and service to our customers. It is critically important that federal policy accommodates the varying business models that are providing value to our customers across the many different environments in the U.S. Duke Energy’s Road Ahead strategy has four elements: transform the customer experience; modernize the power grid; generate cleaner energy; and engage employees and stakeholders. These areas of focus are described at a high level below. Transform the Customer Experience At Duke Energy, customers are at the center of everything we do and we are working hard every day to meet our customers’ changing expectations. Our customers not only want affordable and reliable power but they also want the following: more ways to manage their accounts and their energy use; more ways to interact/communicate with the company; and more options and value opportunities through innovative program offerings. Some examples of the choice, control and convenience our customers want include the following: • Large commercial customers increasingly want renewable energy to meet their corporate sustainability goals. • Cities and towns are requesting customized services such as help with microgrids, smart city services, or renewable energy. • Some residential customers want rooftop solar to generate their own energy. • Residential customers increasingly want to manage their energy use through connected devices like iPhones and Nest Learning Thermostats, as well as through web-based platforms. • Customers also expect Duke Energy to provide service offerings based on their unique needs and individual preferences: frequent updates during outages, bill alerts, as well as the ability to 3 connect or change their service remotely, alternative rate plans and the ability to choose their own monthly payment date that is convenient for the individual customer. Duke Energy is continuing to develop solutions that meet these changing expectations. We’re communicating with customers in ways they prefer, such as through social media channels, two-way texting for outage reporting and high-usage notifications. Customers want to be able to better manage their energy usage and Duke Energy has responded by offering such programs. Modernize the Power Grid Our customers expect their lights to work at the flip of a switch; they expect to be well-informed about power outages when they do occur and the duration of those outages to be minimized. They also seek the ability to readily connect their rooftop solar panels and battery systems to the grid. In order to meet our customers’ modern expectations, we are investing to modernize the power grid. We are making targeted investments in technologies that improve our customers’ energy experience. We are investing in smart meters to provide more customer access to usage information. We are investing in self-healing and other grid automation technologies to make power outages increasingly rare and enable faster service restoration. As more renewables are added to the power system, the variable nature of renewable generation places new demands on the grid, including its need to support a two-way flow of energy on a system designed for single directional power flow. Through our power grid modernization efforts, Duke Energy is preparing for the integration and optimization of these clean and distributed energy resources. Batteries play an important part in overcoming these new challenges and we are working to realize where we can extract the greatest customer value that battery storage has to offer. From a wind farm in Texas to a microgrid in North Carolina, we are investing in battery projects around the country to learn more about how and where battery technology can deliver more value to our customers. [See Attachment B for a summary of Duke Energy’s work in the energy storage space.] Based on this previous work, Duke Energy has recently announced its shift away from simply piloting battery technology to the commercial installation of energy storage technology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solar Power in Florida
    Solar Power in Florida September 20, 2016 Shelly Whitworth Renewable Program Manager Tampa Electric Company Background: Florida’s Regulatory Environment • Scope of comprehensive regulation of investor-owned electric utilities by the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) – Rates – Reliability – Territorial boundaries – Quality of service – Conservation/DSM – Safety • PW Ventures Decision (1988) – Florida Supreme Court clarified that only electric utilities are allowed to sell electricity at retail – The sale of electricity to a single retail customer makes the provider a public utility subject to FPSC regulation – Court ruled that sales of electricity outside the FPSC’s jurisdiction would lead to uneconomic duplication of facilities • Duke Energy Decision (2000) – Florida Supreme Court rules that non-utility entities could not access the State of Florida’s power plant siting process – The court clarified that the Power Plant Siting Act and the Florida Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act were not intended to authorize the determination of need for a power plant with output that is not fully committed to serving retail load • Relevance to solar: 3rd party sales of power at retail are prohibited in Florida Solar Potential Florida is called the “Sunshine State” • Solar Energy Industries Association ranks Florida 3rd for rooftop solar potential • NREL ranks Florida 8th for rooftop solar potential and 9th for overall solar energy potential • Florida has lots of sunshine, but lots of clouds, too, unlike southwestern states Policies Favoring
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Transcript
    1 1 BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 2 DOCKET NO. UNDOCKETED 3 In the Matter of 4 RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD (RPS). 5 ___________________________________/ 6 7 ELECTRONIC VERSIONS OF THIS TRANSCRIPT ARE 8 A CONVENIENCE COPY ONLY AND ARE NOT THE OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING. 9 THE .PDF VERSION INCLUDES PREFILED TESTIMONY. 10 11 12 PROCEEDINGS: WORKSHOP 13 14 BEFORE: CHAIRMAN MATTHEW M. CARTER, II COMMISSIONER LISA POLAK EDGAR 15 COMMISSIONER KATRINA J. McMURRIAN COMMISSIONER NANCY ARGENZIANO 16 COMMISSIONER NATHAN A. SKOP 17 DATE: Friday, July 11, 2008 18 19 TIME: Commenced at 9:30 a.m. Concluded at 3:17 p.m. 20 21 PLACE: Betty Easley Conference Center Joseph P. Cresse Hearing Room 148 22 4075 Esplanade Way Tallahassee, Florida 23 24 REPORTED BY: MARY ALLEN NEEL, RPR, FPR 25 2 1 I N D E X 2 PAGE 3 OPENING REMARKS BY CHAIRMAN CARTER 3 4 DISCUSSION OF 2008 AMENDMENTS TO 366.92, F.S. 7 5 PRESENTATIONS BY INTERESTED PARTIES: 6 STEVE ADAMS, Florida Energy and Climate Commission 12 CHRISTY HERIG, Solar Electric Power Association 14 7 CHRISTOPHER MAINGOT, Solar Coalition 30 MICHAEL DOBSON, FREPA 35 8 MARK SINCLAIR, Clean Energy Group 45 GUS CEPERO, Florida Crystals 60 9 CLAY BETHEA, Buckeye Florida 71 MICHELLE CURTIS, Buckeye Florida 76 10 JOHN WILSON, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy 92 ERIC DRAPER, Audobon of Florida 103 11 MIKE BRANCH, Smurfit-Stone Forest Resources 116 VICKI GORDON KAUFMAN, for Wheelabrator 120 12 RENE SILVA, Florida Power & Light 128 BILL ASHBURN, Tampa Electric Company 131 13 BOB McGEE, Gulf Power Company 134 BOB NIEKUM, Progress Energy Florida 143 14 DISCUSSION OF DRAFT DATA REQUEST 148 15 PUBLIC COMMENT: 16 MIKE TWOMEY, for AARP 152 17 ROY RATNER, Atlas Solar Innovations 158 JOE TRESHLER, Covanta Energy 164 18 DISCUSSION OF SCHEDULING, POST-WORKSHOP 167 19 COMMENTS, AND PROCEDURAL MATTERS 20 CLOSING REMARKS BY THE COMMISSIONERS 171 21 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 181 22 23 24 25 3 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 CHAIRMAN CARTER: Good morning to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Hb 2417, Hd2 Neil Abercrombie Governor Department of Business, Richard C
    HB 2417, HD2 NEIL ABERCROMBIE GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, RICHARD C. LIM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM DIRECTOR MARY ALICE EVANS DEPUTY DIRECTOR No.1 Capitol District Building, 250 South Hotel Street, 5th Floor, Honolulu, Hawail96813 Telephone: (808) 586-2355 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2359, Honolulu, Hawaii 96804 Fax: (808) 586-2377 Web site: www.hawaii.gov/dbedt Statement of REVISED 3/20/12 RICHARD C. LIM Director Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism before the SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:50PM State Capitol, Senate Conference Room 225 in consideration of HB2417 HD 2 Proposed SDI RELATING TO RENEWABLE ENERGY. Chair Gabbard, Vice English, and Members of the Committee. The Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) opposes HB2417 Proposed SD 1, which removes the Renewable Energy Technology System Tax Credit cap and changes the incentive structure for utility scale systems to a ten year production credit. DBEDT supports the HD2 version of this measure and requests that version be passed instead. The proposed SD 1 is likely to increase costs to the State and create conditions for a spike in short-term growth that may not be in the best long-term interests of the State. Assuming that solar capacity follows recent trends and doubles to 70 MW in 2012 for non-utility scale projects, and that an additional 67 MW of utility scale projects are completed within the next several years, the proposed SDI would cost the State roughly $597 million. This scenario
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Local Permitting on the Cost of Solar Power
    The Impact of Local Permitting on the Cost of Solar Power How a federal effort to simplify processes can make solar affordable for 50% of American homes January 2011 Endorsed by: Alteris Renewables Namaste Solar Sullivan Solar Power American Solar Electric PetersenDean Sun Chariot Solar Acro Energy Real Goods Solar Sunetric Corbin Solar REC Solar Sunlight Solar Energy Greenspring Energy RevoluSun SunTrek Solar groSolar Sierra Club Trinity Solar HelioPower SolarTech Verengo Solar Plus Mainstream Energy SolSource The Vote Solar Initiative Mercury Solar Systems The full report is available as a free download at www.sunrunhome.com/permitting. Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 1 Note from SunRun ......................................................................................... 2 The impact of local permitting on the cost of solar power ............................. 3 Local permitting costs $2,516 per installation ............................................ 6 Streamlined permitting will benefit jurisdictions ......................................... 7 Launching the Residential Solar Permitting Initiative ................................... 9 The prize: grid parity for more than half of American homes .................... 11 Appendix ..................................................................................................... 12 Appendix A: Methodology ......................................................................... 13 Appendix B: Data .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Your State Make Electricity? by NADJA POPOVICH DEC
    How Does Your State Make Electricity? By NADJA POPOVICH DEC. 24, 2018 America isn’t making electricity the way it did two decades ago: Natural gas has edged out coal as the country’s leading generation source … … and renewables like wind and solar have made small yet speedy gains. But, each state has its own story. In Nevada, natural gas surpassed coal as the top source of electricity generation in 2005, earlier than in many other states. Coal’s role in the state’s power mix has continued to decline since then. In Iowa, wind power has taken off over the past decade. It now makes up nearly 40 percent of the electricity produced in the state. But in West Virginia, coal still fuels nearly allelectricity generation. Overall, fossil fuels still dominate electricity generation in the United States. But the shift from coal to natural gas has helped to lower carbon dioxide emissions and other pollution. Last year, coal was the main source of electricity generation for 18 states, down from 32 states in 2001. But experts warn that a shift to natural gas alone won’t be enough to curb emissions and avoid dangerous global warming. “Switching from coal to gas is a fine thing to do in the short run, but it’s not a solution in the longer run,” said Severin Borenstein, Director of the Energy Institute at the University of California, Berkeley’s Haas School of Business. “Gas still produces a lot of greenhouse gases. We can’t stay on gas and solve this problem. Ultimately we’re going to have to go to much lower or zero-carbon sources.” We charted every state’s electricity generation mix between 2001 and 2017 using data from the United States Energy Information Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan 2019 – 2028 (This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank.)
    Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan 2019 – 2028 (This page is intentionally left blank.) Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan 2019-2028 Submitted To: Florida Public Service Commission April 2019 (This page is intentionally left blank.) Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables............................................................................................................ iii List of Schedules ........................................................................................................................... v Overview of the Document ........................................................................................................... 1 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter I. Description of Existing Resources .......................................................................... 15 A. FPL-Owned Resources ..................................................................................... 16 B. Capacity and Energy Power Purchases ......................................................... 20 C. Demand Side Management (DSM) .................................................................... 24 Chapter II. Forecast of Electric Power Demand ....................................................................... 27 A. Overview of the Load Forecasting Process .......... …………………………….29
    [Show full text]
  • Political Barriers to Distributed Generation Solar in the Sunshine State
    POLITICAL BARRIERS TO DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SOLAR IN THE SUNSHINE STATE by Debra Taylor A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, FL August 2017 POLITICAL BARRIERS TO DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SOLAR IN THE SUNSHINE STATE by Debra Taylor This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Dr. William O’Brien, and has been approved by the members of her supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Environmental Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ____________________________ Dr. William O’Brien ____________________________ Dr. Kanybek Nur-tegin ____________________________ Dean Dr. Ellen Goldey, Wilkes Honors College __________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I’d to thank my academic/thesis/life advisor, Dr. William O’Brien. Without his assistance, encouragement and dedicated involvement in every step of this process, this paper would never have been accomplished. I would like to thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for your patience, support and understanding over these past two years. I would also like to sincerely thank Dr. Wairimũ Njambi, who challenged me to keep pushing through every obstacle, assuring me that the struggle is both the process and the reward. Your mentorship and inspirational teaching style made my experience at the Honors College truly unforgettable. I am forever grateful for your kindness and encouragement. A special thank you to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Ten-Year Site Plans of Florida’S Electric Utilities
    APPENDIX A REVIEW OF THE 2016 TEN-YEAR SITE PLANS OF FLORIDA’S ELECTRIC UTILITIES NOVEMBER 2016 Ten-Year Site Plan Comments State Agencies Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission- General Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission- Gulf Department of Environmental Protection Regional Planning Councils Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Water Management Districts Southwest Florida Water Management District St. Johns Water Management District Local Governments Charlotte County Environmental Groups Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Sierra Club 1 2 June 21, 2016 Moniaishi Mtenga Division of Engineering Public Service Commission Florida Fish 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard and Wildlife Tallahassee, FL 32399-0850 Conservation [email protected] Commission Commissioners RE: 2016 Ten-Year Power Plant Site Plans Brian Yablonski Chairman Tallahassee Dear Mr. Mtenga: Aliese P. “Liesa” Priddy Vice Chairman Immokalee Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) staff has reviewed the 2016 Ten- Ronald M. Bergeron Year Power Plant Site Plans submitted to the Public Service Commission (PSC). We will be Fort Lauderdale providing comments on the Gulf Power Company (GULF) Ten-Year Site Plan in a subsequent Richard Hanas letter. However, we are submitting this letter to notify you that we have reviewed the following Oviedo plans and have no comments regarding fish and wildlife resources: Bo Rivard Panama City Charles W. Roberts III Gainesville Regional Utilities (GRU) Tallahassee Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC) Robert A. Spottswood City of Tallahassee Utilities (TAL) Key West Jacksonville Energy Authority (JEA) Florida Municipal Power Agency (FMPA) Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) Executive Staff Seminole Electric Cooperative (SEC) Nick Wiley Executive Director Lakeland Electric (LAK) Eric Sutton Tampa Electric Company (TECO) Assistant Executive Director Duke Energy Florida (DEF) Jennifer Fitzwater Chief of Staff We appreciate the opportunity to review the Ten-Year Site Plans, as provided by the PSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrating Solar Power Clean Power on Demand 24/7 Concentrating Solar Power: Clean Power on Demand 24/7
    CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER CLEAN POWER ON DEMAND 24/7 CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER: CLEAN POWER ON DEMAND 24/7 © 2020 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW | Washington DC 20433 | USA 202-473-1000 | www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of the World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because the World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for non-commercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; [email protected]. All images remain the sole property of their source and may not be used for any purpose without written permission from the source. Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank. 2021. Concentrating Solar Power: Clean Power on Demand 24/7.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Warming Solutions That Work Cutting-Edge Efforts to Curb Global Warming Pollution and the Lessons They Hold for America
    Global Warming Solutions that Work Cutting-Edge Efforts to Curb Global Warming Pollution and the Lessons they Hold for America Global Warming Solutions that Work Cutting-Edge Efforts to Curb Global Warming Pollution and the Lessons they Hold for America Environment America Research & Policy Center Tony Dutzik, Joshua Hoen, Timothy Telleen-Lawton, Sarah Payne Frontier Group Matthew Davis, Emily Figdor, Rob Sargent Environment America Research & Policy Center June 2008 Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Douglas Foy, President, Serrafix Corporation; Dave Hewitt of the New Buildings Institute; and Steven Nadel of the American Council for an Energy- Efficient Economy for their review and insightful comments. Thanks also to the many individuals who provided information or insights on the case studies presented here. Finally, thanks to Susan Rakov, Travis Madsen and Elizabeth Ridlington of Frontier Group for their editorial assistance. Environment America Research & Policy Center wishes to thank the Energy Foundation, the John Merck Fund, the Joyce Mertz Gilmore Foundation and the Oak Foundation for making this project possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Environment America Research & Policy Center. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. Copyright 2008 Environment America Research & Policy Center In 2007, Environment America Research & Policy Center became the new home of U.S. PIRG Education Fund’s environmental work, focusing exclusively on improving the quality of our environment and our lives. Drawing on more than 30 years of experience, our pro- fessional staff combines independent research, practical ideas and broad-based educational campaigns to help set the policy agenda, frame the public debate, and win real results for our environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Companies Website Biomass Algal Biomass Organization Aventine Renewable Energy, Inc
    Renewable Energy Companies Website Biomass Algal Biomass Organization http://www.algaebiomass.org/ Aventine Renewable Energy, Inc. http://www.aventinerei.com/ Biomass Engineering UK http://www.biomassengineeringboilers.co.uk/ Caletta http://www.calettarenewable.com/ CRIMSON Renewable Energy http://www.crimsonrenewable.com/ DTE Biomass Energy http://www.dtebe.com/ ESI Inc. of Tennesse http://www.esitenn.com/ Ensyn http://www.ensyn.com/ General Biomass http://www.generalbiomass.com/ Georgia Biomass http://www.gabiomass.com/ Golden Renewable Energy LLC http://www.goldenrenewable.com/ Nexterra http://www.nexterra.ca/ Renewable Energy Group, Inc http://www.regfuel.com/ U.S. Department of Energy Biomass Program http://energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/downloads/us- department-energy-biomass-program Energy Efficiency Enerquip http://www.enerquip.com/ Fluor http://www.fluor.com/Pages/default.aspx GoGreenSolar.com http://www.gogreensolar.com/ Green Mountain Energy Company http://www.greenmountain.com/ Grundfos Direct Sensors https://us.grundfos.com/ Iberdrola Renewables https://www.iberdrola.com/label/renewable- energy Johnson Controls http://www.johnsoncontrols.com/ KACO new energy, Inc. http://www.kaco-newenergy.com/ NV Energy https://www.nvenergy.com/ Rittal Corporation http://www.rittal.com/us-en/content/en/start/ Rotork http://www.rotork.com/en/ Schneider Electric http://www.schneider-electric.com/ww/en/ Tigo Energy http://www.tigoenergy.com/ Waste Management http://www.wm.com/index.jsp Viznenergy Inc. http://www.viznenergy.com Geothermal Altren http://www.altren.net/ Alternative Earth Resources Inc. http://www.alternative- earth.com/s/Home.asp Ambient Technologies, Inc. http://ambienttech.com/ Chena Power http://www.chenapower.com/ Florida Heat Pump http://www.fhp-mfg.com/ Geothermal Energy Association http://www.geo-energy.org/ Geothermal Resources Council http://www.geothermal.org/ Gradient Resources http://www.gradient.com/ Ormat Technologies Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Solar Projects.Xlsx
    Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the United States Operating, Under Construction, or Under Development Updated January 17, 2012 Overview This list is for informational purposes only, reflecting projects and completed milestones in the public domain. The information in this list was gathered from public announcements of solar projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with individual developers. It is not a comprehensive list of all utility‐scale solar projects under development. This list may be missing smaller projects that are not publicly announced. Particularly, many smaller projects located outside of California that are built on a short time‐scale may be underrepresented on this list. Also, SEIA does not guarantee that every identified project will be built. Like any other industry, market conditions may impact project economics and timelines. SEIA will remove a project if it is publicly announced that it has been cancelled. SEIA actively promotes public policy that minimizes regulatory uncertainty and encourages the accelerated deployment of utility‐scale solar power. This list includes ground‐mounted utility‐scale solar power plants larger than 1 MW that directly feed into the transmission grid. This list does not include large "behind the meter" projects that only serve on‐site load. One exception to this is large projects on military bases that only serve the base (see, for example, Nellis Air Force Base). While utility‐scale solar is a large and growing segment of the U.S. solar industry, cumulative installations for residential and non‐residential (commercial, non‐profit and government) solar total 841 MW and 1,634 MW, respectively.
    [Show full text]