DOCSLIB.ORG

Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan 2019 – 2028 (This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank.)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan 2019 – 2028 (This Page Is Intentionally Left Blank.) Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan 2019 – 2028 (This page is intentionally left blank.) Ten Year Power Plant Site Plan 2019-2028 Submitted To: Florida Public Service Commission April 2019 (This page is intentionally left blank.) Table of Contents List of Figures and Tables............................................................................................................ iii List of Schedules ........................................................................................................................... v Overview of the Document ........................................................................................................... 1 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter I. Description of Existing Resources .......................................................................... 15 A. FPL-Owned Resources ..................................................................................... 16 B. Capacity and Energy Power Purchases ......................................................... 20 C. Demand Side Management (DSM) .................................................................... 24 Chapter II. Forecast of Electric Power Demand ....................................................................... 27 A. Overview of the Load Forecasting Process .......... …………………………….29 B. Comparison of FPL’s Current and Previous Load Forecasts ....................... 30 C. Long-Term Sales Forecasts ............................................................................. 31 D. Net Energy for Load (NEL) ............................................................................... 35 E. System Peak Forecasts .................................................................................... 36 F. Hourly Load Forecast ....................................................................................... 38 G. Uncertainty ......................................................................................................... 38 H. DSM ..................................................................................................................... 39 Chapter III. Projection of Incremental Resource Additions .................................................... 49 A. FPL’s Resource Planning ................................................................................. 51 B. Projected Incremental Resource Changes in the Resource Plan ................. 60 C. Discussion of the Projected Resource Plan and Issues Impacting FPL’s Resource Planning Work…………………… ..................................................... 61 D. Demand Side Management (DSM) ................................................................... 67 E. Transmission Plan ............................................................................................. 70 F. Renewable Resources and Storage Technology ............................................ 98 G. FPL’s Fuel Mix and Fuel Price Forecasts ...................................................... 106 Chapter IV. Environmental and Land Use Information ......................................................... 183 A. Protection of the Environment ...................................................................... 185 B. FPL’s Environmental Policy ........................................................................... 186 C. Environmental Management .......................................................................... 188 D. Environmental Assurance Program .............................................................. 188 E. Environmental Communication and Facilitation ......................................... 189 F. Preferred and Potential Sites ......................................................................... 190 Preferred Sites.................................................................................................. 190 1. Preferred Site # 1 – Babcock Preserve Solar Energy Center, Charlotte County .................................................................................... 191 2. Preferred Site # 2 – Blue Heron Solar Energy Center, Hendry County ..................................................................................................... 192 Florida Power & Light Company i 3. Preferred Site # 3 – Cattle Ranch Solar Energy Center, DeSoto County ...................................................................................................... 193 4. Preferred Site # 4 – Northern Preserve Solar Energy Center, Baker County ..................................................................................................... 194 5. Preferred Site # 5 – Sweetbay Solar Energy Center, Martin County. 195 6. Preferred Site # 6 – Twin Lakes Solar Energy Center, Putnam County ..................................................................................................... 196 7. Preferred Site # 7 – Echo River Solar Energy Center, Suwannee County ..................................................................................................... 197 8. Preferred Site # 8 – Hibiscus Solar Energy Center, Palm Beach County ...................................................................................................... 198 9. Preferred Site # 9 – Okeechobee Solar Energy Center, Okeechobee County ..................................................................................................... 199 10. Preferred Site # 10 – Southfork Solar Energy Center, Manatee County ..................................................................................................... 200 11. Preferred Site # 11 – Egret Solar Energy Center, Baker County ...... 201 12. Preferred Site # 12 – Lakeside Solar Energy Center, Okeechobee County ..................................................................................................... 202 13. Preferred Site # 13 – Magnolia Springs Solar Energy Center, Clay County ..................................................................................................... 203 14. Preferred Site # 14 – Pelican Solar Energy Center, St. Lucie County …… ............................................................................................. 204 15. Preferred Site # 15 – Rodeo Solar Energy Center, DeSoto County . 205 16. Preferred Site # 16 – Discovery Solar Energy Center, Brevard County….. ............................................................................................... 206 17. Preferred Site # 17 – Manatee County Site, Manatee County ........... 207 18. Preferred Site # 18 – Nassau Solar Energy Center, Nassau County ..................................................................................................... 208 19. Preferred Site # 19 – Orange Blossom Solar Energy Center, Indian River County ............................................................................... 209 20. Preferred Site # 20 – Palm Bay Solar Energy Center, Brevard County ..................................................................................................... 210 21. Preferred Site # 21 – Putnam County Site, Putnam County ............. 211 22. Preferred Site # 22 – Sabal Palm Solar Energy Center, Palm Beach County ..................................................................................................... 212 23. Preferred Site # 23 – Trailside Solar Energy Center, St. Johns County ..................................................................................................... 213 24. Preferred Site # 24 – Union Springs Solar Energy Center, Union County ..................................................................................................... 214 25. Preferred Site # 25 – Battery Storage, Manatee County ..................... 215 26. Preferred Site # 26 – Lauderdale Modernization (Dania Beach Clean Energy Center Unit 7), Broward County .............................................. 216 27. Preferred Site # 27 – Turkey Point Plant, Miami-Dade County .......... 217 Potential Sites .................................................................................................. 218 28. Potential Site # 1 – Hendry County ...................................................... 218 29. Potential Site # 2 – Martin County ........................................................ 219 30. Potential Site # 3 – Miami-Dade County............................................... 220 31. Potential Site # 4 – Okeechobee County ............................................. 221 Environmental Land and Use Information: Supplemental Information...... 222 Chapter V. Other Planning Assumptions and Information ................................................... 345 Florida Power & Light Company ii List of Figures, Tables, and Maps Table ES-1 Projected Capacity & Firm Purchase Power Changes ................................... 14 Figure I.A.1 FPL Generating Resources by Location (as of December 31, 2018) ............ 17 Table I.A.1 Capacity Resource by Unit Type (as of December 31, 2018) ....................... 18 Figure I.A.2 FPL Substation & Transmission System Configuration ................................ 19 Table I.B.1 Purchase Power Resources by Contract (as of December 31, 2018) ........... 21 Table I.B.2 FPL’s Firm Purchased Power Summer MW ................................................... 22 Table I.B.3 FPL’s Firm Purchased Power Winter MW ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solar Power in Florida
    Solar Power in Florida September 20, 2016 Shelly Whitworth Renewable Program Manager Tampa Electric Company Background: Florida’s Regulatory Environment • Scope of comprehensive regulation of investor-owned electric utilities by the Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) – Rates – Reliability – Territorial boundaries – Quality of service – Conservation/DSM – Safety • PW Ventures Decision (1988) – Florida Supreme Court clarified that only electric utilities are allowed to sell electricity at retail – The sale of electricity to a single retail customer makes the provider a public utility subject to FPSC regulation – Court ruled that sales of electricity outside the FPSC’s jurisdiction would lead to uneconomic duplication of facilities • Duke Energy Decision (2000) – Florida Supreme Court rules that non-utility entities could not access the State of Florida’s power plant siting process – The court clarified that the Power Plant Siting Act and the Florida Energy Efficiency and Conservation Act were not intended to authorize the determination of need for a power plant with output that is not fully committed to serving retail load • Relevance to solar: 3rd party sales of power at retail are prohibited in Florida Solar Potential Florida is called the “Sunshine State” • Solar Energy Industries Association ranks Florida 3rd for rooftop solar potential • NREL ranks Florida 8th for rooftop solar potential and 9th for overall solar energy potential • Florida has lots of sunshine, but lots of clouds, too, unlike southwestern states Policies Favoring
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Transcript
    1 1 BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 2 DOCKET NO. UNDOCKETED 3 In the Matter of 4 RENEWABLE PORTFOLIO STANDARD (RPS). 5 ___________________________________/ 6 7 ELECTRONIC VERSIONS OF THIS TRANSCRIPT ARE 8 A CONVENIENCE COPY ONLY AND ARE NOT THE OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF THE HEARING. 9 THE .PDF VERSION INCLUDES PREFILED TESTIMONY. 10 11 12 PROCEEDINGS: WORKSHOP 13 14 BEFORE: CHAIRMAN MATTHEW M. CARTER, II COMMISSIONER LISA POLAK EDGAR 15 COMMISSIONER KATRINA J. McMURRIAN COMMISSIONER NANCY ARGENZIANO 16 COMMISSIONER NATHAN A. SKOP 17 DATE: Friday, July 11, 2008 18 19 TIME: Commenced at 9:30 a.m. Concluded at 3:17 p.m. 20 21 PLACE: Betty Easley Conference Center Joseph P. Cresse Hearing Room 148 22 4075 Esplanade Way Tallahassee, Florida 23 24 REPORTED BY: MARY ALLEN NEEL, RPR, FPR 25 2 1 I N D E X 2 PAGE 3 OPENING REMARKS BY CHAIRMAN CARTER 3 4 DISCUSSION OF 2008 AMENDMENTS TO 366.92, F.S. 7 5 PRESENTATIONS BY INTERESTED PARTIES: 6 STEVE ADAMS, Florida Energy and Climate Commission 12 CHRISTY HERIG, Solar Electric Power Association 14 7 CHRISTOPHER MAINGOT, Solar Coalition 30 MICHAEL DOBSON, FREPA 35 8 MARK SINCLAIR, Clean Energy Group 45 GUS CEPERO, Florida Crystals 60 9 CLAY BETHEA, Buckeye Florida 71 MICHELLE CURTIS, Buckeye Florida 76 10 JOHN WILSON, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy 92 ERIC DRAPER, Audobon of Florida 103 11 MIKE BRANCH, Smurfit-Stone Forest Resources 116 VICKI GORDON KAUFMAN, for Wheelabrator 120 12 RENE SILVA, Florida Power & Light 128 BILL ASHBURN, Tampa Electric Company 131 13 BOB McGEE, Gulf Power Company 134 BOB NIEKUM, Progress Energy Florida 143 14 DISCUSSION OF DRAFT DATA REQUEST 148 15 PUBLIC COMMENT: 16 MIKE TWOMEY, for AARP 152 17 ROY RATNER, Atlas Solar Innovations 158 JOE TRESHLER, Covanta Energy 164 18 DISCUSSION OF SCHEDULING, POST-WORKSHOP 167 19 COMMENTS, AND PROCEDURAL MATTERS 20 CLOSING REMARKS BY THE COMMISSIONERS 171 21 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER 181 22 23 24 25 3 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 CHAIRMAN CARTER: Good morning to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Hb 2417, Hd2 Neil Abercrombie Governor Department of Business, Richard C
    HB 2417, HD2 NEIL ABERCROMBIE GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, RICHARD C. LIM ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM DIRECTOR MARY ALICE EVANS DEPUTY DIRECTOR No.1 Capitol District Building, 250 South Hotel Street, 5th Floor, Honolulu, Hawail96813 Telephone: (808) 586-2355 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2359, Honolulu, Hawaii 96804 Fax: (808) 586-2377 Web site: www.hawaii.gov/dbedt Statement of REVISED 3/20/12 RICHARD C. LIM Director Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism before the SENATE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:50PM State Capitol, Senate Conference Room 225 in consideration of HB2417 HD 2 Proposed SDI RELATING TO RENEWABLE ENERGY. Chair Gabbard, Vice English, and Members of the Committee. The Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism (DBEDT) opposes HB2417 Proposed SD 1, which removes the Renewable Energy Technology System Tax Credit cap and changes the incentive structure for utility scale systems to a ten year production credit. DBEDT supports the HD2 version of this measure and requests that version be passed instead. The proposed SD 1 is likely to increase costs to the State and create conditions for a spike in short-term growth that may not be in the best long-term interests of the State. Assuming that solar capacity follows recent trends and doubles to 70 MW in 2012 for non-utility scale projects, and that an additional 67 MW of utility scale projects are completed within the next several years, the proposed SDI would cost the State roughly $597 million. This scenario
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Local Permitting on the Cost of Solar Power
    The Impact of Local Permitting on the Cost of Solar Power How a federal effort to simplify processes can make solar affordable for 50% of American homes January 2011 Endorsed by: Alteris Renewables Namaste Solar Sullivan Solar Power American Solar Electric PetersenDean Sun Chariot Solar Acro Energy Real Goods Solar Sunetric Corbin Solar REC Solar Sunlight Solar Energy Greenspring Energy RevoluSun SunTrek Solar groSolar Sierra Club Trinity Solar HelioPower SolarTech Verengo Solar Plus Mainstream Energy SolSource The Vote Solar Initiative Mercury Solar Systems The full report is available as a free download at www.sunrunhome.com/permitting. Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 1 Note from SunRun ......................................................................................... 2 The impact of local permitting on the cost of solar power ............................. 3 Local permitting costs $2,516 per installation ............................................ 6 Streamlined permitting will benefit jurisdictions ......................................... 7 Launching the Residential Solar Permitting Initiative ................................... 9 The prize: grid parity for more than half of American homes .................... 11 Appendix ..................................................................................................... 12 Appendix A: Methodology ......................................................................... 13 Appendix B: Data .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Your State Make Electricity? by NADJA POPOVICH DEC
    How Does Your State Make Electricity? By NADJA POPOVICH DEC. 24, 2018 America isn’t making electricity the way it did two decades ago: Natural gas has edged out coal as the country’s leading generation source … … and renewables like wind and solar have made small yet speedy gains. But, each state has its own story. In Nevada, natural gas surpassed coal as the top source of electricity generation in 2005, earlier than in many other states. Coal’s role in the state’s power mix has continued to decline since then. In Iowa, wind power has taken off over the past decade. It now makes up nearly 40 percent of the electricity produced in the state. But in West Virginia, coal still fuels nearly allelectricity generation. Overall, fossil fuels still dominate electricity generation in the United States. But the shift from coal to natural gas has helped to lower carbon dioxide emissions and other pollution. Last year, coal was the main source of electricity generation for 18 states, down from 32 states in 2001. But experts warn that a shift to natural gas alone won’t be enough to curb emissions and avoid dangerous global warming. “Switching from coal to gas is a fine thing to do in the short run, but it’s not a solution in the longer run,” said Severin Borenstein, Director of the Energy Institute at the University of California, Berkeley’s Haas School of Business. “Gas still produces a lot of greenhouse gases. We can’t stay on gas and solve this problem. Ultimately we’re going to have to go to much lower or zero-carbon sources.” We charted every state’s electricity generation mix between 2001 and 2017 using data from the United States Energy Information Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Barriers to Distributed Generation Solar in the Sunshine State
    POLITICAL BARRIERS TO DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SOLAR IN THE SUNSHINE STATE by Debra Taylor A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Wilkes Honors College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science in Environmental Science Wilkes Honors College of Florida Atlantic University Jupiter, FL August 2017 POLITICAL BARRIERS TO DISTRIBUTED GENERATION SOLAR IN THE SUNSHINE STATE by Debra Taylor This thesis was prepared under the direction of the candidate’s thesis advisor, Dr. William O’Brien, and has been approved by the members of her supervisory committee. It was submitted to the faculty of The Honors College and was accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Environmental Sciences. SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: ____________________________ Dr. William O’Brien ____________________________ Dr. Kanybek Nur-tegin ____________________________ Dean Dr. Ellen Goldey, Wilkes Honors College __________ Date ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I’d to thank my academic/thesis/life advisor, Dr. William O’Brien. Without his assistance, encouragement and dedicated involvement in every step of this process, this paper would never have been accomplished. I would like to thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for your patience, support and understanding over these past two years. I would also like to sincerely thank Dr. Wairimũ Njambi, who challenged me to keep pushing through every obstacle, assuring me that the struggle is both the process and the reward. Your mentorship and inspirational teaching style made my experience at the Honors College truly unforgettable. I am forever grateful for your kindness and encouragement. A special thank you to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Ten-Year Site Plans of Florida’S Electric Utilities
    APPENDIX A REVIEW OF THE 2016 TEN-YEAR SITE PLANS OF FLORIDA’S ELECTRIC UTILITIES NOVEMBER 2016 Ten-Year Site Plan Comments State Agencies Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission- General Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission- Gulf Department of Environmental Protection Regional Planning Councils Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Water Management Districts Southwest Florida Water Management District St. Johns Water Management District Local Governments Charlotte County Environmental Groups Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Sierra Club 1 2 June 21, 2016 Moniaishi Mtenga Division of Engineering Public Service Commission Florida Fish 2540 Shumard Oak Boulevard and Wildlife Tallahassee, FL 32399-0850 Conservation [email protected] Commission Commissioners RE: 2016 Ten-Year Power Plant Site Plans Brian Yablonski Chairman Tallahassee Dear Mr. Mtenga: Aliese P. “Liesa” Priddy Vice Chairman Immokalee Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) staff has reviewed the 2016 Ten- Ronald M. Bergeron Year Power Plant Site Plans submitted to the Public Service Commission (PSC). We will be Fort Lauderdale providing comments on the Gulf Power Company (GULF) Ten-Year Site Plan in a subsequent Richard Hanas letter. However, we are submitting this letter to notify you that we have reviewed the following Oviedo plans and have no comments regarding fish and wildlife resources: Bo Rivard Panama City Charles W. Roberts III Gainesville Regional Utilities (GRU) Tallahassee Orlando Utilities Commission (OUC) Robert A. Spottswood City of Tallahassee Utilities (TAL) Key West Jacksonville Energy Authority (JEA) Florida Municipal Power Agency (FMPA) Florida Power and Light Company (FPL) Executive Staff Seminole Electric Cooperative (SEC) Nick Wiley Executive Director Lakeland Electric (LAK) Eric Sutton Tampa Electric Company (TECO) Assistant Executive Director Duke Energy Florida (DEF) Jennifer Fitzwater Chief of Staff We appreciate the opportunity to review the Ten-Year Site Plans, as provided by the PSC.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrating Solar Power Clean Power on Demand 24/7 Concentrating Solar Power: Clean Power on Demand 24/7
    CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER CLEAN POWER ON DEMAND 24/7 CONCENTRATING SOLAR POWER: CLEAN POWER ON DEMAND 24/7 © 2020 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank 1818 H Street NW | Washington DC 20433 | USA 202-473-1000 | www.worldbank.org This work is a product of the staff of the World Bank with external contributions. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this work do not necessarily reflect the views of the World Bank, its Board of Executive Directors, or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries Rights and Permissions The material in this work is subject to copyright. Because the World Bank encourages dissemination of its knowledge, this work may be reproduced, in whole or in part, for non-commercial purposes as long as full attribution to this work is given. Any queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to World Bank Publications, World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA; fax: 202-522-2625; [email protected]. All images remain the sole property of their source and may not be used for any purpose without written permission from the source. Attribution—Please cite the work as follows: World Bank. 2021. Concentrating Solar Power: Clean Power on Demand 24/7.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Warming Solutions That Work Cutting-Edge Efforts to Curb Global Warming Pollution and the Lessons They Hold for America
    Global Warming Solutions that Work Cutting-Edge Efforts to Curb Global Warming Pollution and the Lessons they Hold for America Global Warming Solutions that Work Cutting-Edge Efforts to Curb Global Warming Pollution and the Lessons they Hold for America Environment America Research & Policy Center Tony Dutzik, Joshua Hoen, Timothy Telleen-Lawton, Sarah Payne Frontier Group Matthew Davis, Emily Figdor, Rob Sargent Environment America Research & Policy Center June 2008 Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Douglas Foy, President, Serrafix Corporation; Dave Hewitt of the New Buildings Institute; and Steven Nadel of the American Council for an Energy- Efficient Economy for their review and insightful comments. Thanks also to the many individuals who provided information or insights on the case studies presented here. Finally, thanks to Susan Rakov, Travis Madsen and Elizabeth Ridlington of Frontier Group for their editorial assistance. Environment America Research & Policy Center wishes to thank the Energy Foundation, the John Merck Fund, the Joyce Mertz Gilmore Foundation and the Oak Foundation for making this project possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Environment America Research & Policy Center. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. Copyright 2008 Environment America Research & Policy Center In 2007, Environment America Research & Policy Center became the new home of U.S. PIRG Education Fund’s environmental work, focusing exclusively on improving the quality of our environment and our lives. Drawing on more than 30 years of experience, our pro- fessional staff combines independent research, practical ideas and broad-based educational campaigns to help set the policy agenda, frame the public debate, and win real results for our environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Companies Website Biomass Algal Biomass Organization Aventine Renewable Energy, Inc
    Renewable Energy Companies Website Biomass Algal Biomass Organization http://www.algaebiomass.org/ Aventine Renewable Energy, Inc. http://www.aventinerei.com/ Biomass Engineering UK http://www.biomassengineeringboilers.co.uk/ Caletta http://www.calettarenewable.com/ CRIMSON Renewable Energy http://www.crimsonrenewable.com/ DTE Biomass Energy http://www.dtebe.com/ ESI Inc. of Tennesse http://www.esitenn.com/ Ensyn http://www.ensyn.com/ General Biomass http://www.generalbiomass.com/ Georgia Biomass http://www.gabiomass.com/ Golden Renewable Energy LLC http://www.goldenrenewable.com/ Nexterra http://www.nexterra.ca/ Renewable Energy Group, Inc http://www.regfuel.com/ U.S. Department of Energy Biomass Program http://energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/downloads/us- department-energy-biomass-program Energy Efficiency Enerquip http://www.enerquip.com/ Fluor http://www.fluor.com/Pages/default.aspx GoGreenSolar.com http://www.gogreensolar.com/ Green Mountain Energy Company http://www.greenmountain.com/ Grundfos Direct Sensors https://us.grundfos.com/ Iberdrola Renewables https://www.iberdrola.com/label/renewable- energy Johnson Controls http://www.johnsoncontrols.com/ KACO new energy, Inc. http://www.kaco-newenergy.com/ NV Energy https://www.nvenergy.com/ Rittal Corporation http://www.rittal.com/us-en/content/en/start/ Rotork http://www.rotork.com/en/ Schneider Electric http://www.schneider-electric.com/ww/en/ Tigo Energy http://www.tigoenergy.com/ Waste Management http://www.wm.com/index.jsp Viznenergy Inc. http://www.viznenergy.com Geothermal Altren http://www.altren.net/ Alternative Earth Resources Inc. http://www.alternative- earth.com/s/Home.asp Ambient Technologies, Inc. http://ambienttech.com/ Chena Power http://www.chenapower.com/ Florida Heat Pump http://www.fhp-mfg.com/ Geothermal Energy Association http://www.geo-energy.org/ Geothermal Resources Council http://www.geothermal.org/ Gradient Resources http://www.gradient.com/ Ormat Technologies Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Solar Projects.Xlsx
    Utility‐Scale Solar Projects in the United States Operating, Under Construction, or Under Development Updated January 17, 2012 Overview This list is for informational purposes only, reflecting projects and completed milestones in the public domain. The information in this list was gathered from public announcements of solar projects in the form of company press releases, news releases, and, in some cases, conversations with individual developers. It is not a comprehensive list of all utility‐scale solar projects under development. This list may be missing smaller projects that are not publicly announced. Particularly, many smaller projects located outside of California that are built on a short time‐scale may be underrepresented on this list. Also, SEIA does not guarantee that every identified project will be built. Like any other industry, market conditions may impact project economics and timelines. SEIA will remove a project if it is publicly announced that it has been cancelled. SEIA actively promotes public policy that minimizes regulatory uncertainty and encourages the accelerated deployment of utility‐scale solar power. This list includes ground‐mounted utility‐scale solar power plants larger than 1 MW that directly feed into the transmission grid. This list does not include large "behind the meter" projects that only serve on‐site load. One exception to this is large projects on military bases that only serve the base (see, for example, Nellis Air Force Base). While utility‐scale solar is a large and growing segment of the U.S. solar industry, cumulative installations for residential and non‐residential (commercial, non‐profit and government) solar total 841 MW and 1,634 MW, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Florida Jobs Project
    Florida Jobs Project A Guide to Creating Advanced Energy Jobs MARCH 2016 AMERICAN JOBS PROJECT A Letter from the American Jobs Project It’s no secret that America’s middle class is in crisis; indeed, “the hollowing out of the middle class” has become a well-worn phrase, causing politicians to rail, bloggers to rage, and citizens to reel. Polls consistently reveal that jobs and the economy are at or near the top of citizen concerns.¹ Over the last few decades, the loss of middle-income jobs in America has been due largely to the global shift in manufacturing (“tradable jobs”) to emerging economies.² Of the millions of jobs lost during the recession, most were good paying, middle-class jobs.³ Unfortunately, many of the jobs created during the recovery have been in low-skill, low-paying occupations.⁴ These trends are not going to reverse themselves. Leadership is needed, but the gridlocked U.S. Congress has failed in recent years to adopt robust policies to stoke middle-class jobs in America. In President George W. Bush’s autobiography, Decision Points, the former president recounts a conversation he had with the then-President of China, Hu Jintao. “What keeps you up at night?” President Bush asked President Hu as an ice-breaker. As we can easily guess, what kept President Bush up at night was worry about terrorism. Hu Jintao’s response was telling: what kept him up at night was, “creating 25 million new jobs a year” for his people.⁵ Is it possible to create good-paying American jobs in today’s global economy? And what if the solutions did not involve Congress at all? What if there were creative middle-class job creation strategies being developed and tested in the laboratories of democracy -- the states and cities? The American Jobs Project seeks to answer these questions and provide a research-based roadmap for action for state and local leaders who are kept up at night trying to figure out how to create jobs for the people they serve.
    [Show full text]