DOCSLIB.ORG

{FREE} Animal Numbers Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{FREE} Animal Numbers Ebook ANIMAL NUMBERS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Thomas Flintham | 24 pages | 04 Jun 2015 | Scholastic | 9781407148076 | English | London, United Kingdom Animal Numbers PDF Book Invertebrate animals such as fruit flies and nematode worms are not covered by the Animals Scientific Procedures Act, All numbers for neurons except Caenorhabditis and Ciona , and all numbers for synapses except Ciona are estimations. This formula puts into consideration every aspect of the list and, also, it can deal with a broad set of data but only requires one copy of the data making very beneficial to the user of this formula. The most recent returns show that 28, procedures were conducted on animals in Not all animals have neurons; Trichoplax and sponges lack nerve cells altogether. This may in turn be a driving force for more sophisticated cognitive quantity estimation throughout evolution. Lab Anim Sci University of Maine. If suckling animals will be euthanized at or before weaning because they are of the wrong genotype or sex for the experiment, they should be included as animals held but not subject to experimental manipulation. It is obvious that such behaviour plays an important role in reproduction and therefore has a high adaptive value. Login or Register to save! Finally, they will trace the number word at the bottom of the farm animal counting worksheet preschool page too. Brain size Brain-to-body mass ratio Encephalization quotient Neuroscience and intelligence Number of neurons. Trying to estimate the numbers of animals used in research worldwide is difficult because many countries do not provide comprehensive statistics. Retrieved 9 December WormBook : 1— Therefore, a male beetle will always go for more females in order to maximise his mating opportunities. After a founder and first-generation offspring have been identified, mating is continued as brother x sister or backcross to a selected inbred to determine whether the transgene or targeted gene will transmit to later generations and can be made homozygous. These additional mice should be listed in the protocol as animals produced but not subjected to experimental manipulation. Determining which animals to include in the estimated number of animals in an animal-use protocol can be confusing to the investigator in the absence of IACUC-developed guidelines. Search Go! This model predicts that, in contests with multiple individuals on each side, chimpanzees in this population should be willing to enter a contest only if they outnumber the opposing side by a factor of at least 1. International estimates. It is essential and significant since it is unbiased compared to when selecting the list on your own since you can be biased related to the kind of animals you are conversant. J Reprod. The use of random animal generator has become one of the essential tools to many people including the new learners. Common bent-wing bat. Sea slug. As this new transgenic or targeted line expands from founder to first, second, and later generations, phenotypes associated with hemizygous or homozygous transgenic mice or heterozygote or homozygote targeted mice will become apparent. Animal Numbers Writer Remarkably, quorum sensing is not confined to bacteria — animals use it to get around, too. The existing selection pressures, whether imposed by the inanimate environment or by other animals, force populations of species to maintain or increase adaptive traits caused by specific genes. Pain in amphibians Pain in animals Pain in cephalopods Pain in crustaceans Pain in fish Pain in invertebrates. These figures are published annually in an annual report by the Home Office Northern Ireland counts separately and an annual report is produced by the Department of Health for Northern Ireland. Like many other animals, chickadees produce alarm calls when they detect a potential predator, such as a hawk, to warn their fellow chickadees. Bookmark this article. A naturally ovulating hybrid or outbred female mouse will usually yield more fertilized eggs or embryos. Share using Email. However, for bison, the most formidable prey, nine to 13 wolves are the best guarantor of success. Mostly, they grow and divide themselves to multiply. WormBook : 1— The opening of trade due to bilateral and multilateral trade negotiations is also expected to boost demand for U. This generator also provides a list of the animals chosen without any limit on the animals chosen. Why would animals crunch numbers in the first place? Domesticated pig. The following are two lists of animals ordered by the size of their nervous system. Biology Letters. You can also suggest whether the generator can provide duplicates to the selected animals from the list or not. Blue-and-yellow macaw. Not all animals have neurons; Trichoplax and sponges lack nerve cells altogether. Appendix B Estimating Animal Numbers. It is unlikely that every prospective female donor will mate at the appropriate time, conceive after mating, or respond to hormone injections. There are worksheets for numbers and number words each featuring a different farm animal to count. It is incredibly cognitively demanding, since the female cowbird needs to visit a nest over multiple days, remember the clutch size from one day to the next, evaluate the change in the number of eggs in the nest from a past visit to the present, assess the number of days that have passed, and then compare these values to make a decision to lay her egg or not. It has a special property that allows it to produce light through a process called bioluminescence, similar to how fireflies give off light. Australia used an estimated 9. Numerical cognition also plays a vital role when it comes to both navigation and developing efficient foraging strategies. Zeilmaker, GD ed. Brenner The mutation is maintained by intercross mating. Sulphur-crested cockatoo. Therefore, a male beetle will always go for more females in order to maximise his mating opportunities. Trends Cogn. The random animal generator will give you a free and fair list of animals. Visit NAP. The random animal generator will give the results with the name of the animal together with their images to give the clear picture of the animals selected. For more information, click here. Effective reproductive life of breeders. Megaphragma mymaripenne. If homozygous mutants experience significant mortality, multiplier must be modified accordingly. Fox, R. Retrieved 21 May Guidelines for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research offers a more in-depth treatment of concerns specific to these disciplines than any previous guide on animal care and use. Animal Numbers Reviews Through various market and animal research programs and reports, USDA has developed biotechnological methods and gathered data and statistics to demonstrate the great development of animal productivity in the United States and foreign markets. Alexandrine parakeet. This formula puts into consideration every aspect of the list and, also, it can deal with a broad set of data but only requires one copy of the data making very beneficial to the user of this formula. Neurons are the cells that transmit information in an animal 's nervous system so that it can sense stimuli from its environment and behave accordingly. Then they will trace large number with arrows to show how to properly form the number; now trace that number below the images. N equals estimated ratio of nontransgenic to transgenic animals to be weaned from original number of blastocysts. Dog Golden retriever. It turns out that processing numbers offers a significant benefit for survival, which is why this behavioural trait is present in many animal populations. Gustav, Fisher, Verlag. If suckling animals will be euthanized at or before weaning because they are of the wrong genotype or sex for the experiment, they should be included as animals held but not subject to experimental manipulation. Proportion infertile matings. January 10, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Therefore, a male beetle will always go for more females in order to maximise his mating opportunities. Witham eds. Animal identification systems provide the ability to identify disease control and eradication, disease surveillance and monitoring, emergency response to foreign animal diseases, regionalization, global trade, livestock production efficiency, consumer concerns over food safety, and emergency management programs. Dairy products range from cheese, fluid milks, yogurt, butter, and ice cream to dry or condensed milk and whey products, which are main ingredients in processed foods. Brief comparisons of number of whole brain neurons top and cerebral cortex neurons bottom among six mammals. Some of the other main generators, in this case, include; random countries generators, random word generator, random movie generator, random names generator, etc. Rangelands provide the principal source of forage for the cattle and sheep operations on thousands of American farms and ranches. Southern elephant seal. Donor females to produce desired number of naturally ovulated fertilized eggs or blastocysts. Festing, M. The cowbird is an astounding example of how far evolution has driven some species to stay in the business of passing on their genes. Rockefeller University Press. Zenker's fruit bat. Estimate as follows:. Eastern rock elephant shrew. The estimated number of animals that are kept for breeding purposes and not subjected to any experimental manipulations should be part of the animal- use protocol. Karger AG. Retrieved Each new transgenic or targeted mouse must be mated to a normal mouse to determine whether the transgene or targeted gene is incorporated into germ cells. In the creation of the list, you move to the custom list randomizer where you enter the animals you would love to randomize with each animal at a different line. A common number is potential founders for a single cDNA construct. Lionesses judge how many intruders they may be facing before approaching them Credit: Alamy. Animal Numbers Read Online If unusual sex ratio is known in advance, multiplier is modified accordingly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Elephant Brain in Numbers
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 12 June 2014 NEUROANATOMY doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00046 The elephant brain in numbers Suzana Herculano-Houzel 1,2*, Kamilla Avelino-de-Souza 1,2, Kleber Neves 1,2, Jairo Porfírio 1,2, Débora Messeder 1,2, Larissa Mattos Feijó 1,2, José Maldonado 3 and Paul R. Manger 4 1 Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2 Instituto Nacional de Neurociência Translacional, São Paulo, Brazil 3 MBF Bioscience, Inc., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 4 School of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa Edited by: What explains the superior cognitive abilities of the human brain compared to other, larger Patrick R. Hof, Mount Sinai School of brains? Here we investigate the possibility that the human brain has a larger number of Medicine, USA neurons than even larger brains by determining the cellular composition of the brain of Reviewed by: the African elephant. We find that the African elephant brain, which is about three times John M. Allman, Caltech, USA 9 Roger Lyons Reep, University of larger than the human brain, contains 257 billion (10 ) neurons, three times more than the Florida, USA average human brain; however, 97.5%of the neurons in the elephant brain (251 billion) are *Correspondence: found in the cerebellum. This makes the elephant an outlier in regard to the number of Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Centro de cerebellar neurons compared to other mammals, which might be related to sensorimotor Ciências da Saúde, Universidade specializations. In contrast, the elephant cerebral cortex, which has twice the mass of the Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rua Carlos Chagas Filho, 373 – sala human cerebral cortex, holds only 5.6 billion neurons, about one third of the number of F1-009, Ilha do Fundão 21941-902, neurons found in the human cerebral cortex.
    [Show full text]
  • How Welfare Biology and Commonsense May Help to Reduce Animal Suffering
    Ng, Yew-Kwang (2016) How welfare biology and commonsense may help to reduce animal suffering. Animal Sentience 7(1) DOI: 10.51291/2377-7478.1012 This article has appeared in the journal Animal Sentience, a peer-reviewed journal on animal cognition and feeling. It has been made open access, free for all, by WellBeing International and deposited in the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ng, Yew-Kwang (2016) How welfare biology and commonsense may help to reduce animal suffering. Animal Sentience 7(1) DOI: 10.51291/2377-7478.1012 Cover Page Footnote I am grateful to Dr. Timothy D. Hau of the University of Hong Kong for assistance. This article is available in Animal Sentience: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/ animsent/vol1/iss7/1 Animal Sentience 2016.007: Ng on Animal Suffering Call for Commentary: Animal Sentience publishes Open Peer Commentary on all accepted target articles. Target articles are peer-reviewed. Commentaries are editorially reviewed. There are submitted commentaries as well as invited commentaries. Commentaries appear as soon as they have been revised and accepted. Target article authors may respond to their commentaries individually or in a joint response to multiple commentaries. Instructions: http://animalstudiesrepository.org/animsent/guidelines.html How welfare biology and commonsense may help to reduce animal suffering Yew-Kwang Ng Division of Economics Nanyang Technological University Singapore Abstract: Welfare biology is the study of the welfare of living things. Welfare is net happiness (enjoyment minus suffering). Since this necessarily involves feelings, Dawkins (2014) has suggested that animal welfare science may face a paradox, because feelings are very difficult to study.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A
    s l a m m a y t T i M S N v I i A e G t A n i p E S r a A C a C E H n T M i THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity The Humane Society of the United State s/ World Society for the Protection of Animals 2009 1 1 1 2 0 A M , n o t s o g B r o . 1 a 0 s 2 u - e a t i p s u S w , t e e r t S h t u o S 9 8 THE CASE AGAINST Marine Mammals in Captivity Authors: Naomi A. Rose, E.C.M. Parsons, and Richard Farinato, 4th edition Editors: Naomi A. Rose and Debra Firmani, 4th edition ©2009 The Humane Society of the United States and the World Society for the Protection of Animals. All rights reserved. ©2008 The HSUS. All rights reserved. Printed on recycled paper, acid free and elemental chlorine free, with soy-based ink. Cover: ©iStockphoto.com/Ying Ying Wong Overview n the debate over marine mammals in captivity, the of the natural environment. The truth is that marine mammals have evolved physically and behaviorally to survive these rigors. public display industry maintains that marine mammal For example, nearly every kind of marine mammal, from sea lion Iexhibits serve a valuable conservation function, people to dolphin, travels large distances daily in a search for food. In learn important information from seeing live animals, and captivity, natural feeding and foraging patterns are completely lost.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Self-Control PNAS PLUS
    The evolution of self-control PNAS PLUS Evan L. MacLeana,1, Brian Harea,b, Charles L. Nunna, Elsa Addessic, Federica Amicid, Rindy C. Andersone, Filippo Aurelif,g, Joseph M. Bakerh,i, Amanda E. Baniaj, Allison M. Barnardk, Neeltje J. Boogertl, Elizabeth M. Brannonb,m, Emily E. Brayn, Joel Braya, Lauren J. N. Brentb,o, Judith M. Burkartp, Josep Calld, Jessica F. Cantlonk, Lucy G. Chekeq, Nicola S. Claytonq, Mikel M. Delgador, Louis J. DiVincentis, Kazuo Fujitat, Esther Herrmannd, Chihiro Hiramatsut, Lucia F. Jacobsr,u, Kerry E. Jordanv, Jennifer R. Laudew, Kristin L. Leimgruberx, Emily J. E. Messerl, Antonio C. de A. Mouray, Ljerka Ostojicq, Alejandra Picardz, Michael L. Platta,b,o,aa, Joshua M. Plotnikq,bb, Friederike Rangecc,dd, Simon M. Readeree, Rachna B. Reddyff, Aaron A. Sandelff, Laurie R. Santosx, Katrin Schumannd, Amanda M. Seedl, Kendra B. Sewalle, Rachael C. Shawq, Katie E. Slocombez, Yanjie Sugg, Ayaka Takimotot, Jingzhi Tana, Ruoting Taol, Carel P. van Schaikp, Zsófia Virányicc, Elisabetta Visalberghic, Jordan C. Wadew, Arii Watanabeq, Jane Widnessx, Julie K. Younghh, Thomas R. Zentallw, and Yini Zhaogg Departments of aEvolutionary Anthropology, aaNeurobiology, and mPsychology and Neuroscience, and bCenter for Cognitive Neuroscience, oDuke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708; cIstituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 00197 Rome, Italy; dDepartment of Developmental and Comparative Psychology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04103
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonality and Brain Size Are Negatively Associated in Frogs
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Seasonality and brain size are negatively associated in frogs: evidence for the expensive brain Received: 7 July 2017 Accepted: 20 November 2017 framework Published: xx xx xxxx Yi Luo1,2, Mao Jun Zhong1,2, Yan Huang1,2, Feng Li1,2, Wen Bo Liao1,2 & Alexander Kotrschal3 The challenges of seasonal environments are thought to contribute to brain evolution, but in which way is debated. According to the Cognitive Bufer Hypothesis (CBH) brain size should increase with seasonality, as the cognitive benefts of a larger brain should help overcoming periods of food scarcity via, for instance, increased behavioral fexibility. However, in line with the Expensive Brain Framework (EBF) brain size should decrease with seasonality because a smaller brain confers energetic benefts in periods of food scarcity. Empirical evidence is inconclusive and mostly limited to homoeothermic animals. Here we used phylogenetic comparative analyses to test the impact of seasonality on brain evolution across 30 species of anurans (frogs) experiencing a wide range of temperature and precipitation. Our results support the EBF because relative brain size and the size of the optic tectum were negatively correlated with variability in temperature. In contrast, we found no association between the variability in precipitation and the length of the dry season with either brain size or the sizes of other major brain regions. We suggest that seasonality-induced food scarcity resulting from higher variability in temperature constrains brain size evolution in anurans. Less seasonal environments may therefore facilitate the evolution of larger brains in poikilothermic animals. Brain size varies dramatically between species1 and the recent decades have uncovered a variety of factors that drive this evolution2–10.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Animals That Come to Mind: Eff Ects of Culture and Experience on Category Fluency
    Journal of Cognition and Culture 10 (2010) 205–220 brill.nl/jocc Naming the Animals that Come to Mind: Eff ects of Culture and Experience on Category Fluency Nathan Winkler-Rhoadesa, Douglas Medinb, Sandra R. Waxmanb, Jennie Woodringb,* and Norbert O. Rossc a Department of Psychology, William James Hall, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street Cambridge, MA 02138, USA b Department of Psychology, Swift Hall 102, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208-2710, USA c Department of Anthropology, Vanderbilt University, 124 Garland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235, USA * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Th is article considers the semantic structure of the animal category from a cross-cultural developmental perspective. Children and adults from three North American communities (urban majority culture, rural majority culture and rural Native American) were prompted to generate animal names, and the resulting lists were analyzed for their underlying dimensionality and for the typicality or salience of specifi c animal names. Th e semantic structure of the animal category appeared to be consistent across cultural groups, but the relative salience of animal kinds varied as a function of culture and fi rst-hand experience with the natural world. Th ese results provide evidence of a shared representation of animals across disparate cultures but also indicate a role for culture in shaping animal concepts. Keywords Categorization, development, cross-culture, Native American, folkbiology, name generation Introduction Universals and Cultural Specifi cs in Folkbiology A robust fi nding in folkbiological research is that across the world’s cultures, individuals categorize and name animals (as well as plants) in fundamentally similar ways (e.g., Berlin et al., 1973; Atran, 1990; Berlin, 1992; Malt, 1995; Coley et al., 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary History of Cetacean Brain and Body Size
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 11-2013 The Evolutionary History of Cetacean Brain and Body Size Stephen H. Montgomery University of Cambridge Jonathan H. Geisler New York Institute of Technology - Old Westbury Michael R. McGowen Wayne State University Charlotte Fox University of Cambridge Lori Marino Emory University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_vsm Part of the Animal Structures Commons, Animal Studies Commons, and the Veterinary Anatomy Commons Recommended Citation Montgomery, S. H., Geisler, J. H., McGowen, M. R., Fox, C., Marino, L., & Gatesy, J. (2013). The evolutionary history of cetacean brain and body size. Evolution, 67(11), 3339-3353. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Stephen H. Montgomery, Jonathan H. Geisler, Michael R. McGowen, Charlotte Fox, Lori Marino, and John Gatesy This article is available at WBI Studies Repository: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_vsm/14 The Evolutionary History of Cetacean Brain and Body Size Stephen H. Montgomery University of Cambridge Jonathan H. Geisler New York Institute of Technology Michael R. McGowen Wayne State University School of Medicine Charlotte Fox University of Cambridge Lori Marino Emory University John Gatesy University of California – Riverside KEYWORDS brain size, body size, cetaceans, dolphins, encephalization, evolution, macroevolution, whales ABSTRACT Cetaceans rival primates in brain size relative to body size and include species with the largest brains and biggest bodies to have ever evolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Commissioners
    BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ANDREW H. GREEN, THOMAS C. FIELDS, ROBERT J. DILLON, PETER B. SWEENY, Resigned, November, 1871. HENRY HILTON, (L 22d (I tL HENRY G. STEBBINS, Appointed 22d " L ( FREDERICK E. CHURCH, L (6 61 << ANDREW H. GREEN, ROBERT J. DILLON, THOMAS C. FIELDS, FREDERICK E. CHURCH, , HENRY G. STEBBINS, . Resigned, 28th May, 1872. FRED. LAW OLMSTED, . Appointed, " LL I( President. PETER B. SWEENY, . To 22d November, 1871. LL I1 HENRY G. STEBBINS, . From " Vice-President. HENRY HILTON, . To 22d November, 1871. (Vacancy.) From " L L LC Treasurer. HENRY HILTON, . To 22d November, 1871. LC I L HENRY G. STEBBINS, . From " Conzptroller of Accounts. GE0RG.E M. VAN NORT. President and Treasurer. HENRY G. STEBBINS, . To 28th May, 1872. Il FRED. LAW OLMSTED, . From " " Vice-President. ANDREW H. GREEN, . From 15th May, 1872. Clerk to the Board. E. P. BARKER, . From 30th January to 26th June. 1 F. W. WHITTEMORE, . From 26th June to 10th July. \, I Secretary. I F. W. WHITTEMORE, . Office constituted 10th July, 1872. 8 I CONTENTS. Change of Administration-Reduction of Force-Contraction of Fields of Labor-Liabilities, November, 1871-Involved Accounts-Funds raised for one class of work applied to another- Plans Suspended-Location of Buildings for orMetropolitan Museum of Art and American Mn- seum of Natural History. ............................................................. PAt Union Spuare-Modification of its Plan-Statistics of Use-Projected Improvements.. ........ PAGE 4 111.-THE CENTRALPARK : Its Cost-Indications of its Value-the Increased Value of Real Estate-Statement of Valuations of Real Estate adjoining the Park for a series of years-The Rate of Taxes for 1871.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Effects of Environment on Brain Size in Insects
    insects Review A Review of Effects of Environment on Brain Size in Insects Thomas Carle Faculty of Biology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan; [email protected] Simple Summary: What makes a big brain is fascinating since it is considered as a measure of intelligence. Above all, brain size is associated with body size. If species that have evolved with complex social behaviours possess relatively bigger brains than those deprived of such behaviours, this does not constitute the only factor affecting brain size. Other factors such as individual experience or surrounding environment also play roles in the size of the brain. In this review, I summarize the recent findings about the effects of environment on brain size in insects. I also discuss evidence about how the environment has an impact on sensory systems and influences brain size. Abstract: Brain size fascinates society as well as researchers since it is a measure often associated with intelligence and was used to define species with high “intellectual capabilities”. In general, brain size is correlated with body size. However, there are disparities in terms of relative brain size between species that may be explained by several factors such as the complexity of social behaviour, the ‘social brain hypothesis’, or learning and memory capabilities. These disparities are used to classify species according to an ‘encephalization quotient’. However, environment also has an important role on the development and evolution of brain size. In this review, I summarise the recent studies looking at the effects of environment on brain size in insects, and introduce the idea that the role of environment might be mediated through the relationship between olfaction and vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Modi Ed Formulas for Calculation of Encephalization Quotient in Dogs
    Modied Formulas for Calculation of Encephalization Quotient in Dogs Saganuwan Alhaji Saganuwan ( [email protected] ) Federal University of Agriculture Research note Keywords: German Shepherd, Allometry, Encephalization Quotient, Intelligence Posted Date: March 18th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-322274/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/8 Abstract Objective Dogs are a breed of animals that play important roles, ranging from security passing through companionship to models of research for application in humans. Intelligence is the key factor to success in life, most especially for dogs that are used for security purposes at the airports, seaports, public places, houses, schools and farms. However, it has been reported that there is correlation between intelligence, body weight, height and craniometry in human. In view of this, literatures on body weight, height and body surface areas of ten dogs were assessed with a view to determining their comparative level of intelligence. Results Findings revealed that dogs share brain common allometric relationships with human as shown by Encephalization Quotient (EQ)= Brain Mass/0.14 x Body weight0.528 as compared with Brain Mass /0.12 x Body Weight0.66 and Brain Mass (E)=kpβ, where p is the body weight,k=0.14 and β=0.528 which yielded better results as compared with the other formulas. Dogs with BSA, weight and height similar to that of human are the most intelligent. Doberman Pinscher is the most intelligent followed by German Shepherd, Labrador Retriever, Golden Retriever, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Primate Encephalization
    Provided for non-commercial research and educational use only. Not for reproduction, distribution or commercial use. This chapter was originally published in the book Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 195, published by Elsevier, and the attached copy is provided by Elsevier for the author's benefit and for the benefit of the author's institution, for non-commercial research and educational use including without limitation use in instruction at your institution, sending it to specific colleagues who know you, and providing a copy to your institution’s administrator. All other uses, reproduction and distribution, including without limitation commercial reprints, selling or licensing copies or access, or posting on open internet sites, your personal or institution’s website or repository, are prohibited. For exceptions, permission may be sought for such use through Elsevier's permissions site at: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissionusematerial From: Louis Lefebvre, Primate encephalization. In Michel A. Hofman, Dean Falk, editors: Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 195, Amsterdam: The Netherlands, 2012, pp. 393-412. ISBN: 978-0-444-53860-4 © Copyright 2012 Elsevier B.V. Elsevier Author's personal copy M. A. Hofman and D. Falk (Eds.) Progress in Brain Research, Vol. 195 ISSN: 0079-6123 Copyright Ó 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 19 Primate encephalization Louis Lefebvre* Department of Biology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada Abstract: Encephalization is a concept that implies an increase in brain or neocortex size
    [Show full text]
  • Does Diving Limit Brain Size in Cetaceans?
    WellBeing International WBI Studies Repository 4-2006 Does Diving Limit Brain Size in Cetaceans? Lori Marino Emory University Daniel Sol McGill University Kristen Toren Emory University Louis Lefebvre McGill University Follow this and additional works at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/acwp_vsm Part of the Animal Structures Commons, Animal Studies Commons, and the Veterinary Anatomy Commons Recommended Citation Marino, L., Sol, D., Toren, K., & Lefebvre, L. (2006). Does diving limit brain size in cetaceans?. Marine Mammal Science, 22(2), 413-425. This material is brought to you for free and open access by WellBeing International. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Does Diving Limit Brain Size in Cetaceans? Lori Marino,1,2 Daniel Sol,3,4 Kristen Toren,1 and Louis Lefebvre3 1 Emory University 2 Yeres Regional Primate Center 3 McGill University 4 Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona KEYWORDS brain size, diving, oxygenation, cetacean ABSTRACT We test the longstanding hypothesis, known as the dive constraint hypothesis, that the oxygenation demands of diving pose a constraint on aquatic mammal brain size.Using a sample of 23 cetacean species we examine the relationship among six different measures of relative brain size, body size, and maximum diving duration. Unlike previous tests we include body size as a covariate and perform independent contrast analyses to control for phylogeny. We show that diving does not limit brain size in cetaceans and therefore provide no support for the dive constraint hypothesis. Instead, body size is the main predictor of maximum diving duration in cetaceans.
    [Show full text]