DOCSLIB.ORG

Interacting Dark Energy and Modified Gravity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interacting Dark Energy and Modified Gravity Late-Time Acceleration: Interacting Dark Energy and Modified Gravity by Timothy Clemson This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Portsmouth. September 23, 2013 Abstract In 1998 astronomical observations of distant stars exploding at the ends of their lives led to the discovery that the expansion of the Universe is acceler- ating. This is likely to be caused by an intrinsic part of Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity known as the cosmological constant, but naturalness issues and the need to improve observational tests have motivated the study of alternative models of the Universe. The research in this thesis is part of ongoing efforts to pin down the cause of late-time acceleration by better understanding these alternatives and their signatures in cosmological obser- vations. One such alternative is known as interacting dark energy and would be caused by additional matter in the Universe, as yet unknown to particle physics. This would interact with another unknown particle called dark matter that has been part of the standard model of cosmology since the 1970’s. The first part of this thesis contains a review of works on interacting dark energy and investigates a particular version of the model which had not been studied in detail before, placing recent observational constraints on its parameters. Another alternative to the cosmological constant is known as modified gravity, where General Relativity is extended by the addition of new degrees of freedom. Theories of modified gravity are mathematically related to some models of interacting dark energy and can appear very similar in cosmological observations. The second part of this thesis investigates the extent to which the two can be distinguished using current observational data. i Table of Contents Abstract i Declaration ix Acknowledgements x Dissemination xi Abbreviations xii Definitions and Notation xiii 1 Perspectives on ΛCDM 1 1.1 TheCosmologicalConstant . 2 1.1.1 History . 3 1.1.2 The place of Λ in GR . 4 1.1.3 Problems . 4 1.2 Observations............................ 6 1.2.1 CMBandBAO ...................... 7 1.2.2 SNIa and H0 ....................... 8 1.2.3 Otherprobes ....................... 9 1.3 AlternativestoΛCDM ...................... 11 1.3.1 Darkenergy........................ 11 1.3.2 Modified gravity . 13 1.3.3 Other possibilities . 14 ii 2 Cosmological Perturbations 15 2.1 PerturbingtheMetric ...................... 15 2.2 GaugeTransformation . 19 2.3 Gauge-Invariant Variables . 21 2.4 Observables ............................ 23 2.5 DynamicsoftheMetric. .. .. 24 2.6 SpecificGaugeChoices . .. .. 26 2.6.1 Synchronous........................ 26 2.6.2 Newtonian . 27 2.7 Dynamicsofthefluid....................... 29 3 IDE in the literature 32 3.1 AnOverviewofIDE ....................... 32 3.2 HistoricalContext ........................ 34 3.3 Interactions Proportional to ψ˙ .................. 36 3.3.1 Early works . 37 3.3.2 Laterworks ........................ 40 3.3.3 Particle theory . 42 3.3.4 Massive neutrinos . 44 3.3.5 Halo collapse . 45 3.3.6 Simulations . 46 3.4 Interactions Proportional to .................. 49 H 3.4.1 Constant coupling . 50 3.4.2 Variable coupling . 51 3.4.3 Observations . 52 3.4.4 Clusters . 54 3.4.5 Applications . 55 3.4.6 Theory........................... 56 3.5 InteractionsProportionaltoΓ . 58 3.5.1 IntroducingtheΓmodel . 58 3.5.2 First constraints . 59 3.5.3 Instabilities . 60 iii 3.5.4 Generalisation . 60 3.5.5 Classification . 62 3.5.6 Quadratic couplings . 63 3.5.7 Improvedconstraints . 64 3.6 OtherFormsofCouplings . 64 3.6.1 Motivatedbytheory . 64 3.6.2 Designedforapurpose . 65 3.7 Parameterisations of Interactions . 66 3.7.1 The ξ parameterisation. 67 3.7.2 The ǫ parameterisation. 68 3.7.3 Other forms of parameterisation . 69 3.8 OtherWorks............................ 69 3.8.1 Reconstruction of the coupling . 69 3.8.2 Particle theory . 70 3.8.3 Vacuumdecay....................... 71 3.9 Discussion............................. 71 4 Constraining a Model of Interacting Dark Energy 74 4.1 ModelDevelopment........................ 74 4.1.1 IDEinthebackground . 75 4.1.2 IDE in the perturbations . 76 4.1.3 Initial conditions . 82 4.2 CodingfortheModel....................... 83 4.2.1 Modifying CAMB . 83 4.2.2 Maple checks . 84 4.2.3 CosmoMC......................... 84 4.2.4 Using the SCIAMA supercomputer . 87 4.3 Analysis .............................. 88 4.3.1 Effects on the CMB and matter power spectra . 88 4.3.2 Likelihood analysis . 90 4.3.3 Analysis of the best-fit models . 94 4.3.4 Growthofstructure. 98 iv 4.4 Conclusions ............................ 101 5 Mathematically Equivalent Models of Interacting Dark En- ergy and Modified Gravity 104 5.1 ConformalEquivalence . 104 5.2 HistoricalContext ........................ 105 5.3 TheDualMG/IDEDescriptions. 105 5.3.1 Field equations . 107 5.3.2 Scalar field equations of motion . 109 5.3.3 Metric perturbations . 111 5.3.4 Coupling terms . 115 5.3.5 Growthequations.. .. 116 5.4 DirectComparison ........................ 117 6 The Distinguishability of Interacting Dark Energy from Mod- ified Gravity 120 6.1 Introduction............................ 120 6.1.1 Distinguishing DE and MG . 121 6.1.2 Distinguishing IDE and MG . 121 6.1.3 The IDE and MG models . 122 6.2 IDE/DGP............................. 123 6.2.1 Matching . 124 6.2.2 Comparison . 125 6.2.3 Distinguishability . 127 6.3 IDE/STT ............................. 129 6.3.1 Matching . 130 6.3.2 Comparison . 132 6.3.3 Distinguishability . 134 6.4 Conclusions ............................ 136 7 Conclusions 137 Bibliography 140 v List of Tables 3.1 Observational constraints on the direction of energy transfer fromaselectionofIDEworks . 72 4.1 Cosmological parameters of the median and best-fit samples from CosmoMC for Q Γρ IDE models with w 1 and ∝ x ≥ − Γ 0. ............................... 89 ≥ 4.2 Cosmological parameters of the median and best-fit samples from CosmoMC for w = 1 and when the entire parameter − space is considered for the Q Γρ IDEmodel ........ 93 ∝ x vi List of Figures 4.1 Comparison of δ from CAMB and Maple for a Q Γρ IDE c ∝ x model ............................... 85 4.2 Comparison of ρ from CAMB and Maple for a Q Γρ IDE x ∝ x model ............................... 86 4.3 CMB power spectra for an illustrative selection of Q Γρ ∝ x IDEmodels ............................ 88 4.4 Total matter power spectra for an illustrative selection of Q ∝ Γρx IDEmodels.......................... 90 4.5 Marginalised probability distributions for Q Γρ IDE mod- ∝ x els with w> 1 and Γ 0.................... 91 − ≥ 4.6 Marginalised probability distributions for Q Γρ IDE mod- ∝ x els over the entire w Γparameterspace. 92 − 4.7 Marginalised probability distributions for Q Γρ IDE mod- ∝ x els over the entire w Ω parameterspace. 92 − m 4.8 Distributions of accepted steps in the MCMC chains for Q ∝ Γρx IDEmodels.......................... 94 4.9 CMB power spectra for best-fit Q Γρ IDE models . 96 ∝ x 4.10 Total matter power spectra for best-fit Q Γρ IDE models . 97 ∝ x 4.11 Normalised growth rates for ΛCDM and best-fit Q Γρ IDE ∝ x models............................... 98 4.12 Effective dark energy equation of state for best-fit Q Γρ ∝ x IDEmodels ............................ 99 vii 4.13 Effective Hubble parameter and effective Newton constant for best-fit Q Γρ IDEmodels................... 101 ∝ x 5.1 Evolution of quantities in equivalent IDE and MG models . 119 6.1 Evolution of the density perturbation and the density param- etersformatchedDGP/IDEmodels. 126 6.2 Solutions of Ω′ in the matched IDE/DGP setup . 127 6.3 Evolution of the sum of the metric potentials and the EG pa- rameterformatchedDGP/IDEmodels . 128 6.4 Results in the µ Σ plane for the matched DGP/IDE models 129 − 6.5 Solutions of ψ′2 and Ω′ in the IDE/STT setup . 131 ′ ′ 6.6 ψ and Ω limits on Ωi as a function of ω for the IDE/STT system............................... 132 6.7 Evolution of the density perturbation and the density param- etersformatchedSTT/IDEmodels . 133 6.8 Evolution of the sum of the metric potentials and the EG pa- rameter for matched STT/IDE models . 134 6.9 Results in the µ Σ plane for the matched STT/IDE models . 135 − viii Declaration Whilst registered as a candidate for the above degree, I have not been regis- tered for any other research award. The results and conclusions embodied in this thesis are the work of the named candidate and have not been submitted for any other academic award. Word count: Approximately 32,000 words. ix Acknowledgements My thanks go to Kazuya and Gong-Bo for giving their time during my PhD, Roy for his insight into the model and to Rachael and my parents for sup- porting me during my write-up. x Dissemination Interacting Dark Energy – constraints and degeneracies Timothy Clemson, Kazuya Koyama, Gong-Bo Zhao, Roy Maartens and Jussi Valiviita. Physical Review D, volume 85, (2012), 043007. arXiv:1109.6234 [astro-ph.CO] The Distinguishability of Interacting Dark Energy from Modified Gravity Timothy Clemson and Kazuya Koyama. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, volume 1301, (2013), 010. arXiv:1209.2618 [astro-ph.CO] Presentations September 2011 Interacting Dark Energy, UKCosmo, ICG. July 2012 Interacting Dark Energy and Modified Gravity, Thirteenth Marcel Grossmann Meeting, Stockholm. xi Abbreviations General Relativity GR Dark Energy DE Interacting Dark Energy IDE Dark Matter DM Cold Dark Matter CDM Modified Gravity MG Scalar-Tensor Theory STT Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Facts and Ideas in Modern Cosmology
    FACTS AND IDEAS IN MODERN COSMOLOGY Yu. V. Baryshev(1,2) F. Sylos Labini(3,4) M. Montuori(4,5) L. Pietronero(4) 1 (1) Astronomical Institute of St. Petersburg University, St. Petersburg 198904, Russia (2) Scientific-Educational Union ”Earth & Universe”, St. Petersburg, Russia (3) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Bologna, Italy (4) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Roma ” La Sapienza” P.le A. Moro 2, I-00185 Roma, Italy. (5) Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Cosenza, Italy Accepted for publication in Vistas In astronomy Vol.38 Part.4, 1994 Abstract A review of the principles of observational testing of cosmological theories is given with a special emphasis on the distinction between observational facts and theoretical hypotheses. A classification of modern cosmological theories and possible observational tests for these theories is presented. The main rival cosmological models are analyzed from the point of view of observational testing of their initial hypothesis. A comparison of modern observational data with theoretical predictions is presented. In particular we discuss in detail the validity of the two basic assumptions of modern cosmology that are the Cosmological Principle and the Expanding Space Paradigm. It is found that classical paradigms need to be reanalyzed and that it is necessary to develop crucial cosmological tests to discriminate alternative theories. arXiv:astro-ph/9503074v1 20 Mar 1995 1 INTRODUCTION Cosmology as a part of physics is an experimental science. For this reason all reasonable relations in cosmology must have an experimental confirmation. The fast growth of observational data in the last two decades now has made possible the comparison between observable quantities and theoretical predictions.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMARY. Part I: the Fractal 5D Organic Universe. I. the Fractal Universe, Its 5D Metric
    SUMMARY. Part I: The Fractal 5D Organic Universe. I. The fractal Universe, its 5D Metric. II. Leibniz vs. Newton: Vital, Topologic Space. Its 3±¡ Dimotions. III. Absolute relativity. S=T. The Galilean Paradox. IV. The 5 Postulates of Non-Euclidean, Non-Aristotelian, vital topology V. Cyclical time. Its 3 ages=states of matter. Worldcycles of existence. VI. The Stientific method. Planes of Formal Stiences :¡logic, existential Algebra Part II: Astrophysics. ∆+4,3 scales: Cosmology & Astrophysics: Scalar big-bangs. Galatoms. Hyper-universe. I. Falsifications of the cosmic big-bang. Æntropic man: Science is culture. II. The little bang. III. The ages of the galaxy . IV The ‘Galatom’: Scalar Unification of the 5 forces as Dimotions of the galaxy. V. The ‘Galacell’: A galactic organism. Its symmetries of scale and topologies in space. VI. Light Stars, its topologic, organic parts. VII. Black stars. Thermodynamics of black holes. ∆-4,3 scales: Quantum physics. Comments on the right model. I. Broglie’s theory. 1 5TH DIMENSION METRIC AND THE NESTED UNIVERSE. When we google the 5th dimension one gets surprised by the quantity of speculative answers to a question, which is no longer pseudo- science, but has been for two decades a field of research in systems sciences rather than physics (: no, the answers of google, considering the fifth dimension the upper-self etc. seem to be very popular, but are to 5D science more like a medium in earlier XX c. talking about the 4th dimension as astrological awareness, for lack of understanding of Einstein’s metric functions of the 4th dimension). This is the key word that differentiates pseudo-science from a proper scientific description of a dimension of space-time, the existence of a metric function that describes a dimension and allows to travel through it.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1811.09674V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph]
    Does fractal Universe describe a complete cosmic scenario ? Dipanjana Das1∗, Sourav Dutta2†, Abdulla Al Mamon1‡, and Subenoy Chakraborty1§ 1Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata-700032, West Bengal, India 2 Department of Pure Mathematics, Ballygunge Science College, 35, Ballygunge Circular Rd, Ballygunge, Kolkata, West Bengal 700019 The present work deals with evolution of the fractal model of the Universe in the background of homogeneous and isotropic FLRW space–time geometry. The cosmic substrum is taken as perfect fluid with barotropic equation of state. A general prescription for the deceleration parameter is determined and it is examined whether the deceleration parameter may have more than one transition during the evolution of the fractal Universe for monomial form of the fractal function as a function of the scale factor. Finally, the model has been examined by making comparison with the observed data. Keywords: Fractal Universe, Cosmic Scenario, Deceleration Parameter. I. INTRODUCTION The homogeneous and isotropic FLRW (Friedmann Lemaitre Robertson Walker) model without the Lambda term in standard relativistic cosmology has been put in a big question mark for the last two decades due to a series of observational evidences ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]). However, there are various attempts to go arXiv:1811.09674v1 [physics.gen-ph] 15 Nov 2018 beyond the simple hypothesis of homogeneity and isotropy and to include the effect of spatial inhomogeneities in the metric. These observational data are interpreted in the framework of the Friedmann solutions of the Einstein field equations and it is found that there should be an acceleration.
    [Show full text]
  • D:\Documents and Settings\JF\De
    Detecting Fractal Dimensions Via Primordial Gravitational Wave Astronomy. J.Foukzon1, A.A.Potapov2,S.A. Podosenov3,E.R.Men’kova2. 1Israel Institute of Technology. 2IRE RAS, 3All-Russian Scientific-Research Institute for Optical and Physical Measurements. Abstract Lower fractal dimensionality of the early Universe at higher energies is an theoretical possibility as recently pointed out in [1].Gravitational-wave experiments with interferometers and with resonant masses can search for stochastic backgrounds of gravitational waves of cosmological origin.In this paper using cosmological models with fractional action and Calcagni approach to cosmology in fractal spacetime [18], we will examine a number of theoretical aspects of the searches fractal dimensionality from a stochastic fractal background of GWs. Content I.Introduction. II.Spacetimes with non-integer dimensions. II.1.Gegeometric formalism with the fractional Caputo derivative. II.2.Einstein Equations on Fractional Manifolds. II.3.Fractional Spacetimes and Black Holes.Fractional deformations of the Schwarzschild spacetime. II.4.Fractional deformations of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime. III.Cosmological models with fractional action functional. III.1.Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmology with a fractional time dimensions. III.2.3 dimensional fractal universe.The vacuum case. III.3.3 dimensional fractal universe.The radiation-dominated epoch. III.4.3 dimensional fractal universe.The inflationary epoch. III.5.3 dimensional Universe. Cosmological models of scalar field with fractional action. 1 IV. Crossover from low dimensional to 3 1-dimensional universe. IV.1.Mureika and Stojkovic crossover from 2 1-to3 1-dimensional universe. IV.2.Crossover from 3 -to3 1-dimensional universe using -FRW cosmology. IV.3.Crossover from Df Dt1 -to3 1-dimensional universe using G.Colgany cosmology.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical Properties of Dark Energy Models in Fractal Universe
    S S symmetry Article Dynamical Properties of Dark Energy Models in Fractal Universe Muhammad Umair Shahzad 1, Ayesha Iqbal 2 and Abdul Jawad 3* 1 CAMS, Business School, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan; [email protected] 2 Department of Mathematics, Govt. College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan; [email protected] 3 Department of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Lahore-Campus, Lahore 54000, Pakistan; [email protected] or [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 July 2019 ; Accepted: 9 September 2019 ; Published: 16 September 2019 Abstract: In this paper, we consider the flat FRW spacetime filled with interacting dark energy and dark matter in fractal universe. We work with the three models of dark energy named as Tsallis, Renyi and Sharma–Mittal. We investigate different cosmological implications such as equation of state parameter, squared speed of sound, deceleration parameter, statefinder parameters, we f f − we´ f f (where prime indicates the derivative with respect to ln a, and a is cosmic scale factor) plane and Om diagnostic. We explore these parameters graphically to study the evolving universe. We compare the consistency of dark energy models with the accelerating universe observational data. All three models are stable in fractal universe and support accelerated expansion of the universe. Keywords: Cosmological Parameters; Dark Energy Models; Fractal Universe 1. Introduction The presence of networks of voids and structures in distribution of galaxies in space is one of the remarkable findings in the last two decades. The earlier pervasive examination of galaxy distribution with focus only on angular coordinates was unable to locate such high scale structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Holographic Tachyon in Fractal Geometry
    Mathematical and Computational Applications Article Holographic Tachyon in Fractal Geometry Mustafa Salti * and Oktay Aydogdu Department of Physics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Mersin University, Mersin 33343, Turkey; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +90-324-367-0001/4618 Academic Editor: Mehmet Pakdemirli Received: 18 February 2016; Accepted: 25 May 2016; Published: 31 May 2016 Abstract: The search of a logical quantum gravity theory is one of the noteworthy issues in modern theoretical physics. It is known that most of the quantum gravity theories describe our universe as a dimensional flow. From this point of view, one can investigate whether and how these attractive properties are related with the ultraviolet-divergence problem. These important points motivated us to discuss the reconstruction of a scalar field problem in the fractal theory which is a well-known quantum theory of gravity. Making use of time-like fractal model and considering the holographic description of galactic dark energy, we implement a correspondence between the tachyon model of galactic dark energy effect and holographic energy. Such a connection gives us an opportunity to redefine the fractal dynamics of selected scalar field representation by considering the time-evolution of holographic energy. Keywords: holographic dark energy; accelerated expansion; fractal geometry 1. Introduction The recent galactic observations (type Ia supernovae (SNe-Ia) [1], Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) [2], Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDS) [3], X-Ray [4], Planck-2013 [5]) give very important evidence that indicate that the universe appears to be expanding at an increasing rate. It is commonly accepted that this mysterious behavior comes from the existence of exotic dark components: 26.8 percent dark matter and 68.3 percent dark energy [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Plato, and the Fractal Geometry of the Universe
    Plato, and the Fractal Geometry of the Universe Student Name: Nico Heidari Tari Student Number: 430060 Supervisor: Harrie de Swart Erasmus School of Philosophy Erasmus University Rotterdam Bachelor’s Thesis June, 2018 1 Table of contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 Section I: the Fibonacci Sequence ............................................................................................. 6 Section II: Definition of a Fractal ............................................................................................ 18 Section III: Fractals in the World ............................................................................................. 24 Section IV: Fractals in the Universe......................................................................................... 33 Section V: Fractal Cosmology ................................................................................................. 40 Section VI: Plato and Spinoza .................................................................................................. 56 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 62 List of References ..................................................................................................................... 66 2 Introduction Ever since the dawn of humanity, people have wondered about the nature of the universe. This was
    [Show full text]
  • Spectral Action Models of Gravity on Packed Swiss Cheese Cosmology
    SPECTRAL ACTION MODELS OF GRAVITY ON PACKED SWISS CHEESE COSMOLOGY ADAM BALL AND MATILDE MARCOLLI Abstract. We present a model of (modified) gravity on spacetimes with fractal structure based on packing of spheres, which are (Euclidean) variants of the Packed Swiss Cheese Cosmology models. As the action functional for gravity we consider the spectral action of noncommutative geometry, and we compute its expansion on a space obtained as an Apollonian packing of 3-dimensional spheres inside a 4-dimensional ball. Using information from the zeta function of the Dirac operator of the spectral triple, we show that the leading terms in the asymptotic expansion of the spectral action consist of a zeta regularization of the divergent sum of the leading terms of the spectral actions of the individual spheres in the packing, which accounts for the contribution of the points 1 and 3 in the dimension spectrum (as in the case of a 3-sphere). There is an additional term coming from the residue at the additional point in the real dimension spectrum that corresponds to the packing constant, as well as a series of fluctuations coming from log-periodic oscillations, created by the points of the dimension spectrum that are off the real line. These terms detect the fractality of the residue set of the sphere packing. We show that the presence of fractality influences the shape of the slow-roll potential for inflation, obtained from the spectral action. We also discuss the effect of truncating the fractal structure at a certain scale related to the energy scale in the spectral action.
    [Show full text]
  • 50. the Infinite Fractal Universe (June 2005)
    First Crisis in Cosmology Conference (CCC-I), June 23-25, 2005, Monção, Portugal The Infinite Fractal Universe Robert L. Oldershaw Geology Dept. Amherst College, Amherst, MA 01002 [email protected] With regard to cosmology, we live at a very privileged time. When we read about exciting and revolutionary paradigm changes, in which our most fundamental ideas about nature undergo radical revisions, the drama usually has taken place well before we were born. Today, however, we have the rare opportunity of witnessing at first hand a profound transformation in our understanding of how the Universe is structured. This ongoing change of cosmological paradigms from a “small” finite cosmos to an infinite fractal cosmos began about two decades ago and is in full swing at present. The short version of what is happening goes like this. For about 50 years the Big Bang model of the Universe has provided an excellent explanation for the basic cosmological observations: a very large-scale expansion, an approximately uniform background of microwave radiation and a unique set of abundances for the atomic elements. However, there were some technical problems with this model, such as an acausal beginning of spacetime, a lack of magnetic monopoles, an unexpectedly high degree of uniformity, and an enigmatic knife-edge balance between the open and closed states. Then in the early 1980s Alan Guth showed how these and other problems with the Big Bang model could be solved in one fell swoop with the Inflationary Scenario1, which postulated a very brief period of ultra-rapid expansion shortly after the Big Bang.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Fractal Structure of the Universe
    On the Fractal Structure of the Universe P V Gruji´c§ and V D Pankovi´c† § Institute of Physics, P.O. Box 57, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia † Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, 21000 Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovi´ca 4, Serbia PACS. 98.65.-r, 98.65.Dx, 98.80.Es Short title: Fractal cosmos Abstract. Despite the observational evidence that the Universe appears hierar- chically structured up to a distance of at least 30 Mpc/h (and possibly up to 100 Mpc/h), the fractal paradigm has not yet been recognized by the majority of cos- mologists today. In this work we provide a brief overview of the recent observational and theoretical advances relevant to the question of the global cosmic structure and present some simple calculations which indicate how the hierarchical structure may pass over to the homogeneous Universe at very large scale. We show that the fractal structure may be derived from the moderately nonuniform matter distribution. We address a number of epistemological questions relevant to a general outlook of the Cosmos at large too. arXiv:0907.2127v1 [physics.gen-ph] 13 Jul 2009 1 Introduction Hierarchical models of the Universe appear as old as the cosmology. The first attempt to describe an infinite cosmos was made by Anaxagoras, who conceived the world built according to the principle: everything contains everything (see, e.g. [1]), what is tantamount to assuming that each part of the physical world resembles the entire cosmos. This idea was taken up by a number of European cosmologists, from Kant to the present day ones (see, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Tests and Problems of the Standard Model in Cosmology
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 1 February 2017 doi:10.20944/preprints201702.0002.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Foundations of Physics 2017, 47, , 711-768; doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0073-8 Tests and Problems of the Standard Model in Cosmology Mart´ınL´opez-Corredoira Abstract The main foundations of the standard ΛCDM model of cosmology are that: 1) The redshifts of the galaxies are due to the expansion of the Uni- verse plus peculiar motions; 2) The cosmic microwave background radiation and its anisotropies derive from the high energy primordial Universe when matter and radiation became decoupled; 3) The abundance pattern of the light elements is explained in terms of primordial nucleosynthesis; and 4) The formation and evolution of galaxies can be explained only in terms of gravi- tation within a inflation+dark matter+dark energy scenario. Numerous tests have been carried out on these ideas and, although the standard model works pretty well in fitting many observations, there are also many data that present apparent caveats to be understood with it. In this paper, I offer a review of these tests and problems, as well as some examples of alternative models. Keywords Cosmology · Observational cosmology · Origin, formation, and abundances of the elements · dark matter · dark energy · superclusters and large-scale structure of the Universe PACS 98.80.-k · 98.80.E · 98.80.Ft · 95.35.+d · 95.36.+x · 98.65.Dx Mathematics Subject Classification (2000) 85A40 · 85-03 1 Introduction There is a dearth of discussion about possible wrong statements in the foun- dations of standard cosmology (the \Big Bang" hypothesis in the present-day version of ΛCDM, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • An Astrophysical Peek Into Einstein's Static Universe: No Dark Energy
    International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2011, 1, 183-199 doi:10.4236/ijaa.2011.14024 Published Online December 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ijaa) An Astrophysical Peek into Einstein’s Static Universe: No Dark Energy Abhas Mitra Theoretical Astrophysics Section, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India E-mail: [email protected] Received June 26, 2011; revised August 28, 2011; accepted September 13, 2011 Abstract It is shown that in order that the fluid pressure and acceleration are uniform and finite in Einstein’s Static Universe (ESU), , the cosmological constant, is zero. being a fundamental constant, should be the same everywhere including the Friedman model. Independent proofs show that it must be so. Accordingly, the supposed acceleration of the universe and the attendant concept of a “Dark Energy” (DE) could be an illusion; an artifact of explaining cosmological observations in terms of an oversimplified model which is fundamentally inappropriate. Indeed observations show that the actual universe is lumpy and inhomogeneous at the largest scales. Further in order that there is no preferred centre, such an inhomogeneity might be ex- pressed in terms of infinite hierarchial fractals. Also, the recent finding that the Friedman model intrinsically corresponds to zero pressure (and hence zero temperature) in accordance with the fact that an ideal Hubble flow implies no collision, no randomness (Mitra, Astrophys. Sp. Sc., 333,351, 2011) too shows that the Friedman model cannot represent the real universe having pressure, temperature and radiation. Dark Energy might also be an artifact of the neglect of dust absorption of distant Type 1a supernovae coupled with likely evolution of supernovae luminosities or imprecise calibration of cosmic distance ladders or other systemetic errors (White, Rep.
    [Show full text]