Journal of Educational Supervision Volume 2 | Issue 1 Article 5 2019 Tinker, Tailor, Supervisor, Spy: Lessons Learned from Distant Supervision Elizabeth Currin University of South Carolina,
[email protected] Stephanie Schroeder Pennsylvania State University,
[email protected] Elizabeth Bondy University of Florida,
[email protected] Brittney Castanheira University of Florida,
[email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/jes Part of the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons Recommended Citation Currin, E., Schroeder, S., Bondy, E., & Castanheira, B. (2019). Tinker, Tailor, Supervisor, Spy: Lessons Learned from Distant Supervision. Journal of Educational Supervision, 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.2.1.5 This Empirical Research is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Educational Supervision by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Empirical Research Tinker, Tailor, Supervisor, Journal of Educational Supervision 78 – 97 Volume 2, Issue 1, 2019 Spy: Lessons Learned from DOI: https://doi.org/10.31045/jes.2.1.5 https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/jes/ Distant Supervision Elizabeth Currin1, Stephanie Schroeder2, Elizabeth Bondy3, and Brittany Castanheira3 Abstract This study investigates the transition from a local to a distant model of clinical intern supervision at a large, public, research university. Interviews were conducted with supervisors who had participated in local and distant supervision to explore challenges and adaptations throughout the first year of the distant model. Aside from areas of consensus, such as difficulties with communication, observations, coaching, and seminar meetings, the supervisors revealed distinctly different responses to the expectation of carrying out the distant supervision model with fidelity.