DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional and Property Analysis Lower Wisconsin State Riverway

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional and Property Analysis Lower Wisconsin State Riverway Regional and Property Analysis Lower Wisconsin State Riverway March 2014 Cover photo by Brad Hutnik (back of front cover) The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and function under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. This publication is available in alternative format (large print, Braille, audio tape, etc.) upon request. Please contact the Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Facilities and Lands at (608) 266-2135 for more information. Pub-LF- 080 2014 Table of Contents I) Introduction and Overview ........................................................................... 1 Purpose of Regional and Property Analysis ................................................................. 1 Introduction to the Property and Region ....................................................................... 1 Background and Property History ................................................................................ 4 Riverway Protection and Aesthetic regulations ............................................................ 6 II) THE REGIONAL CONTEXT ............................................................... 8 Social-economic Environment ...................................................................................... 8 Regional Population Centers and Transportation ............................................................. 8 Land Use ............................................................................................................................ 9 Land Values ........................................................................................................................ 9 Land Development ............................................................................................................. 9 Population ........................................................................................................................ 10 Economic Context ............................................................................................................ 13 Recreation ........................................................................................................................ 13 Biological Resources and Ecological Capability ........................................................ 15 Regional Ecological Context ............................................................................................ 15 Natural Communities ....................................................................................................... 17 Rare Species ..................................................................................................................... 17 Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ............................................................. 17 Other Works Highlighting the Ecological Importance of the LWSR ............................... 19 III. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS ............................... 21 Boundary and Ownership ........................................................................................... 21 Topography, Geology, and Soils ................................................................................ 21 Geology and Glacial History ........................................................................................... 21 Soils .................................................................................................................................. 22 i The River and Other Water Resources ............................................................................. 23 Ecological Changes in Recent History ....................................................................... 25 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................... 25 Fire ................................................................................................................................... 26 Hydrologic Changes ......................................................................................................... 26 Vegetation and Natural Communities of the LWSR and Opportunities to Conserve Them ..................................................................................................................................... 27 Dry Upland Forests .......................................................................................................... 27 Southern Mesic Forests .................................................................................................... 28 Southern Dry-mesic Forests ............................................................................................. 29 Southern Dry Forests ....................................................................................................... 29 Pine Relicts ....................................................................................................................... 30 Floodplain Forests ........................................................................................................... 30 Oak Openings and Oak Woodlands ................................................................................. 30 Barrens Natural Communities ......................................................................................... 31 Prairies ............................................................................................................................. 31 Rare Vascular Plants ....................................................................................................... 32 Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation .............................................................. 32 Ecological Connections ................................................................................................... 32 Migration Corridor .......................................................................................................... 32 Older Forests / Old-Growth Forests ................................................................................ 33 Floodplain Forests ........................................................................................................... 33 Aquatic Features .............................................................................................................. 34 Open Wetlands ................................................................................................................. 35 Oak Openings, Oak Woodlands, Prairies, and Barrens .................................................. 35 Mesic Forest Rare Plant Conservation ............................................................................ 37 Exceptional Site-specific Opportunities for Natural Community Conservation .............. 38 Wildlife of the LWSR ................................................................................................. 41 ii Mammals .......................................................................................................................... 41 Birds ................................................................................................................................. 41 Fish ................................................................................................................................... 42 Mussels and other Aquatic Invertebrates ......................................................................... 43 Reptiles and Amphibians .................................................................................................. 44 Terrestrial Invertebrates .................................................................................................. 45 Management Opportunities for Rare Wildlife Species ..................................................... 45 Threats to the Biodiversity of the LWSR .......................................................................... 55 Future Biological Inventory, Monitoring, and Research Needs ...................................... 55 Cultural History of the LWSR .................................................................................... 57 Recreational Use and Facilities of the LWSR ............................................................ 58 Boating and sandbar camping: ........................................................................................ 58 Fishing: ............................................................................................................................ 58 Sunbathing and Swimming: .............................................................................................. 59 Equestrian Use: ................................................................................................................ 59 Hiking and Cross-country Skiing: .................................................................................... 59 Picnicing: ......................................................................................................................... 60 Special Events: ................................................................................................................. 60 Historic sites: ................................................................................................................... 60 Hunting ............................................................................................................................. 60 Birding and Wildlife Viewing: ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Prairie Ecological Landscape
    Chapter 23 Western Prairie Ecological Landscape Where to Find the Publication The Ecological Landscapes of Wisconsin publication is available online, in CD format, and in limited quantities as a hard copy. Individual chapters are available for download in PDF format through the Wisconsin DNR website (http://dnr.wi.gov/, keyword “landscapes”). The introductory chapters (Part 1) and supporting materials (Part 3) should be downloaded along with individual ecological landscape chapters in Part 2 to aid in understanding and using the ecological landscape chapters. In addition to containing the full chapter of each ecological landscape, the website highlights key information such as the ecological landscape at a glance, Species of Greatest Conservation Need, natural community management opportunities, general management opportunities, and ecological landscape and Landtype Association maps (Appendix K of each ecological landscape chapter). These web pages are meant to be dynamic and were designed to work in close association with materials from the Wisconsin Wildlife Action Plan as well as with information on Wisconsin’s natural communities from the Wisconsin Natural Heritage Inventory Program. If you have a need for a CD or paper copy of this book, you may request one from Dreux Watermolen, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707. Photos (L to R): Prothonotary Warbler, photo by John and Karen Hollingsworth, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; prairie ragwort, photo by Dick Bauer; Loggerhead Shrike, photo by Dave Menke; yellow gentian, photo by June Dobberpuhl; Blue-winged Teal, photo by Jack Bartholmai. Suggested Citation Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2015. The ecological landscapes of Wisconsin: An assessment of ecological resources and a guide to planning sustainable management.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Proventriculus of Immature Anisoptera (Odonata) with Reference to Its Use in Taxonomy
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1955 The rP oventriculus of Immature Anisoptera (Odonata) With Reference to Itsuse in Taxonomy. Alice Howard Ferguson Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Ferguson, Alice Howard, "The rP oventriculus of Immature Anisoptera (Odonata) With Reference to Itsuse in Taxonomy." (1955). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 103. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/103 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PROTENTRICULUS OF IMMATURE ANISOPTERA (ODONATA) WITH REFERENCE TO ITS USE IN TAXONOMY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Zoology, Physiology, and Entomology Alice Howard Ferguson B. S., Southern Methodist University, 193& M. S., Southern Methodist University, I9U0 June, 1955 EXAMINATION AND THESIS REPORT Candidate: Miss Alice Ferguson Major Field: Entomology Title of Thesis: The Proventriculus of Immature Anisoptera (Odonata) with Reference to its Use in Taxonomy Approved: Major Professor and Chairman Deanpf-tfio Graduate School EXAMINING COMMITTEE: m 1.1 ^ ----------------------------- jJ------- --- 7 ------ Date of Examination: May6 , 195$ PiKC t U R D C N ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I want to express ny appreciation to the members of ny committee, especially to J.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Oklahoma Odonata
    Libellula comanche Calvert, 1907 - Comanche Skimmer Useful regional references: Libellula composita (Hagen, 1873) - Bleached Skimmer A Checklist of Libellula croceipennis Selys, 1868 - Neon Skimmer —Dragonflies and damselflies of the West by Dennis Paulson (2009) Libellula cyanea Fabricius, 1775 - Spangled Skimmer and Dragonflies and damselflies of the East by Dennis Paulson (2011) Oklahoma Odonata Libellula flavida Rambur, 1842 - Yellow-sided Skimmer Princeton University Press. Libellula incesta Hagen, 1861 - Slaty Skimmer —Damselflies of Texas: A Field Guide by John C. Abbott (2011) and (Dragonflies and Damselflies) Libellula luctuosa Burmeister, 1839 - Widow Skimmer Dragonflies of Texas: A Field Guide by John C. Abbott (2015) University of Texas Press. Libellula nodisticta Hagen, 1861 - Hoary Skimmer Libellula pulchella Drury, 1773 - Twelve-spotted Skimmer —Oklahoma Odonata Project: https://biosurvey.ou.edu/smith/Oklahoma_Odonata.html Libellula saturata Uhler, 1857 - Flame Skimmer Compiled by Brenda D. Smith — Smith BD, Patten MA (2020) Dragonflies at a Biogeographical Libellula semifasciata Burmeister, 1839 - Painted Skimmer Crossroads: The Odonata of Oklahoma and Complexities Beyond its & Michael A. Patten Libellula vibrans Fabricius, 1793 - Great Blue Skimmer Borders. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. Macrodiplax balteata (Hagen, 1861) - Marl Pennant Miathyria marcella (Selys, 1856) - Hyacinth Glider Oklahoma Biological Survey, Micrathyria hagenii Kirby, 1890 - Thornbush Dasher Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • MN Odonata Gazette Fall 2008
    Fall 2008 MINNESOTA ODONATA Volume 1, Issue 3 GAZETTE Minnesota Odonata Survey Project, 10704 Prescott Ct., Burnsville, MN 55337 www.mndragonfly.org [email protected] 952-894-8185 Kurt Mead Coordinator Dianne Rowse Interim Coordinator The 2008 Dragonfly Workshops a Success! MOSP offered numerous workshops throughout Also, there were a few common dragonflies Minnesota in 2008. Kurt Mead led some early- that had not been previously recorded in season trainings for MN Department of Natural some of the counties, such as the Wandering Resources employees; unfortunately, not very Glider, Blue Dasher and Common Pondhawk. many odonates attended on these cool days. Dianne Rowse led five summer workshops, If you have 2008 Minnesota odonate with 58 participants and 37 new county record specimens or photos on a disk, please label species collected. Here are the details: and send these to me by December 5, to *June 14 at Prairie Wetlands Learning Center, the address above. Fergus Falls, Otter Tail County - 3 new records *June 21 at Lebanon Hills Visitor Center, Plan to attend a workshop next summer Eagan, Dakota County - 6 new records to refresh your skills and learn from other *June 28 at Quarry Hill Nature Center, odonate enthusiasts. The annual Rochester, Olmsted County - 8 new records MN Dragonfly Gathering is already scheduled *July 11-13, the annual MN Dragonfly for July 17-19, 2009, at Shalom Hill Farm Gathering, at the Audubon Center of the Retreat Center near Windom, in Cottonwood North Woods, Sandstone, Pine County - 15 County (southwest MN). new records *Aug. 9 at Sherburne National Wildlife Refuge, The 2009 Summer Calendar will be posted Zimmerman, Sherburne County- 5 new records this winter at the MOSP website: Many of the county records are damselflies, www.mndragonfly.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Dragonflies of A( Nisoptera) Arkansas George L
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 31 Article 17 1977 Dragonflies of A( nisoptera) Arkansas George L. Harp Arkansas State University John D. Rickett University of Arkansas at Little Rock Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Entomology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Harp, George L. and Rickett, John D. (1977) "Dragonflies of (Anisoptera) Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 31 , Article 17. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol31/iss1/17 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 31 [1977], Art. 17 The Dragonflies (Anisoptera) of Arkansas GEORGE L.HARP Division of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University State University, Arkansas 72467 JOHND. RICKETT Department of Biology, University of Arkansas at LittleRock LittleRock, Arkansas 72204 ABSTRACT Previous publications have recorded 69 species of dragonflies for Arkansas. Three of these are deleted, but state records for 21 new species are reported herein, bringing the list to 87 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Variation in a Restricted-Range Endemic Dragonfly Gomphurus Ozarkensis (Odonata: Gomphidae), with Description of a New Subspecies
    J. Insect Biodiversity 013 (2): 015–026 ISSN 2538-1318 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/jib J. Insect Biodiversity Copyright © 2019 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2147-7612 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.12976/jib/2019.13.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1EDFA307-DBE4-4C91-AC62-02845C7AA214 Geographic variation in a restricted-range endemic dragonfly Gomphurus ozarkensis (Odonata: Gomphidae), with description of a new subspecies MICHAEL A. PATTEN1, ALEXANDRA A. BARNARD1,2 & BRENDA D. SMITH1 1Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA 2Current affiliation: Math and Sciences Division, National Park College, Hot Springs, Arkansas 71913, USA *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The geographic distribution of Gomphurus ozarkensis (Westfall, 1975), a species described to science only four decades ago, is confined to a four-state area in the central United States: southeastern Kansas, eastern Oklahoma, western and northern Arkansas, and southern Missouri. Its small range has led some to classify it a species of conservation concern. We examined geographic variation in the species, which despite its small range exists in three distinct subpopulations: one in the Ouachita Mountains of western Arkansas and southeastern Oklahoma; one on the Ozark Plateau of northeastern Oklahoma, south- eastern-most Kansas, southern Missouri, and northern Arkansas; and one in the Osage/Flint hills of southeastern Kansas and northeastern Oklahoma. Clinal variation is evident in the extent of yellow on the terminal abdominal segments and the extent to which certain thoracic stripes are fused. A population in a separate watershed basin in the southern Osage Hills of Okla- homa is taxonomically distinct, with some phenotypic characters tending toward G.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurocordulia (Platycordulia) Xanthosoma (Williamson) in Texas (Odonata: Libellulidae: Corduliinae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 9 Number 1 - Spring 1976 Number 1 - Spring 1976 Article 4 April 1976 Neurocordulia (Platycordulia) Xanthosoma (Williamson) in Texas (Odonata: Libellulidae: Corduliinae) Curtis E. Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Curtis E. 1976. "Neurocordulia (Platycordulia) Xanthosoma (Williamson) in Texas (Odonata: Libellulidae: Corduliinae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 9 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol9/iss1/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Williams: <i>Neurocordulia (Platycordulia) Xanthosoma</i> (Williamson) in T THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST NEUROCORDULIA (PLA TYCORDULIA) XANTHOSOMA (WILLIAMSON) IN TEXAS (ODONATA: LIBELLLII-I DAE: CORDULIINAE) Curtis E. Williams1 The rarity of a species is usually judged by the number of specimens in collections, both private and institutional, and the number of places where it has been found or seen. On this basis, Neurocordulia xanthosoma (Williamson) is rare. Its crepuscular habits, its brown coloration, and its habitat requirements, coupled with the habits of most collectors, have been its protection. Nevertheless, because of its apparent special requirements and man's modification of, and encroachment on, its environment, it may soon be a species of the past. It was first collected in 1907, when Oklahoma was still Indian Territory, near Wister, now of Le Flore County, by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverine Clubtail,Stylurus Amnicola
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Riverine Clubtail Stylurus amnicola Boreal population Great Lakes Plains population Prairie population in Canada Boreal population - DATA DEFICIENT Great Lakes Plains population - ENDANGERED Prairie population - DATA DEFICIENT 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Riverine Clubtail Stylurus amnicola in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiv + 60 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Robert Foster and Allan Harris for writing the status report on Riverine Clubtail, Stylurus amnicola, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Dr. Paul Catling, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Arthropods Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Gomphe riverain (Stylurus amnicola) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Riverine Clubtail — Provided by report writer. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2013. Catalogue No. CW69-14/662-2013E-PDF ISBN 978-1-100-22135-9 Recycled paper COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2012 Common name Riverine Clubtail - Boreal population Scientific name Stylurus amnicola Status Data Deficient Reason for designation The isolated population of this dragonfly has been found on tributaries of the Gatineau and Ottawa rivers, and near Quebec City (it was first discovered near Hull).
    [Show full text]
  • Three New State Records of Odonata from Ohio, with Additional County Records Ohio Historical Society, 1985 Velma Avenue, Columbu
    Ohio Biological Survey Notes 2: 25-33, 1999. © Ohio Biological Survey Three New State Records of Odonata from Ohio, with Additional County Records ROBERT C. GLOTZHOBER Ohio Historical Society, 1985 Velma Avenue, Columbus, Oh 43211 Abstract. Since 1995 the members of the Ohio Odonata Survey have newly recorded three dragonfly species to the state list: Lanthus vernalis, Neurocordulia molesta, and Somatochlora incurvata. In addition, survey workers have collected a total of 712 new county records. The total Odonata species and subspecies in Ohio now numbers 159. History and Acknowledgements The Ohio Odonata Survey was initiated in 1991 and supported in part with funds from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife’s income tax check-off funds with additional assistance from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the Ohio Biological Survey, and the Crane Hollow Foundation. The mostly volunteer members of the survey donated substantial amounts of time and expertise. Many of the volunteers who have found new county records appear in Table 1 along with other individuals whose records were shared. A complete list of survey volunteers will appear in the appendix to a future publication. Several members of the Ohio Odonata Survey deserve special mention here. Thirteen members helped found the survey and/ or later joined the steering committee. These individuals made major contributions in helping to identify potential survey locations, summarizing characteristics of “targeted species” to assist survey volunteers, and identifying specimens collected by non-professional volunteers. These members include: Robert W. Alrutz, John Bater, Eric G. Chapman, Stephen W. Chordas III, Bernie Counts, Susan Heady, David McShaffrey, Dwight L.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 ___C O N Te N T S ~
    10 NSECTS THE NEWSJOURNAL OF THE TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS' ASSOCIATION VOLUME 5, NUMBER 2 JANUARY 2000 C_o_n_te_n_t_s_~ ___ Letters 1 Notes From The Editor's Desk 1 Notable InsectSightings 2 Upcoming Programs 3 TEA Response to the FWCA 4 1999 Student Symposiim Abstracts 6 Dragonflies of Ontario Recent additions and species to watch for by Paul Catling 7 Announcements 13 1999 Algonquin Park Butterfly Counts by Colin Jones 12 Proposal re: Ontario Butterfly Altas byQuimby Hess 17 Meeting and Field Trip Reports 18 1999 Durham Region Butterfly Counts by James Kamstra 20 1999 Toronto Centre Butterfly Count by Garth Riley 21 Some Historical Highlights re: Records on Ontario Lepidoptera by Quimby Hess : 23 Monarch Notes byDon Davis 24 Entomophilia .Inside Back Cover Front Cover illustration: Libel/ula quadrimaculata after the final molt, pp. 53 in R. Imes, The Practical Entomologist, Quarto Publishing, 1992. Issue Date: January 12, 2000 ISSN: 1203-3995 Ontario Insects Letters ~ Re: Notes from the Editor's Desk, 01 endeavor. With the new Fish and In any case, if I haven't been clear so Vol 5(1), Sept. 1999 Wildlife Conservation Act, it is now far in this letter, put me on the side of possible for us to examine our attitudes those who feel that releasing captive­ Dear Ms. Carney, and examine how they should change. reared butterflies out of territory is iII­ Your editorial makes a positive link Much as the last 60 years of birding has considered and dangerous to the between a captive-reared lpopulation of seen an enormous change in attitude environment, as well as non­ Giant Swallowtails, their successful (no one goes bird watching with a gun productive.
    [Show full text]