DOCSLIB.ORG

50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–10 Edition) § 226.212

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–10 Edition) § 226.212 § 226.212 50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–10 Edition) [70 FR 52536, Sept. 2, 2005] are included in paragraphs (i) through (u) of this section, and these descrip- § 226.212 Critical habitat for 13 tions are the definitive source for de- Evolutionarily Significant Units termining the critical habitat bound- (ESUs) of salmon and steelhead aries. General location maps are pro- (Oncorhynchus spp.) in Washington, Oregon and Idaho. vided at the end of each ESU descrip- tion (paragraphs (i) through (u) of this Critical habitat is designated in the section) and are provided for general following states and counties for the guidance purposes only, and not as a following ESUs as described in para- definitive source for determining crit- graph (a) of this section, and as further ical habitat boundaries. described in paragraphs (b) through (g) (a) Critical habitat is designated for of this section. The textual descrip- the following ESUs in the following tions of critical habitat for each ESU states and counties: ESU StateÐCounties (1) Puget Sound chinook salmon ................................................ WAÐClallam, Jefferson, King, Mason, Pierce, Skagit, Snoho- mish, Thurston, and Whatcom. (2) Lower Columbia River chinook salmon ................................. (i) ORÐClackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Hood River, and Mult- nomah. (ii) WAÐClark, Cowlitz, Klickitat, Lewis, Pacific, Skamania, and Wahkiakum. (3) Upper Willamette River chinook salmon ............................... (i) ORÐBenton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Lane, Linn, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, and Yamhill. (ii) WAÐClark, Cowlitz, Pacific, and Wahkiakum. (4) Upper Columbia River spring-run chinook salmon ................ (i) ORÐClatsop, Columbia, Gilliam, Hood River, Morrow, Mult- nomah, Sherman, Umatilla, and Wasco. (ii) WAÐBenton, Chelan, Clark, Cowlitz, Douglas, Franklin, Grant, Kittitas, Klickitat, Okanogan, Pacific, Skamania, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Yakima. (5) Hood Canal summer-run chum salmon ................................. WAÐClallam, Jefferson, Kitsap, and Mason. (6) Columbia River chum salmon ................................................ (i) ORÐClatsop, Columbia, Hood River, and Multnomah. (ii) WAÐClark, Cowlitz, Klickitat, Lewis, Pacific, Skamania, and Wahkiakum. (7) Ozette Lake sockeye salmon ................................................ WAÐClallam. (8) Upper Columbia River steelhead ........................................... (i) ORÐClatsop, Columbia, Gilliam, Hood River, Morrow, Mult- nomah, Umatilla, and Wasco. (ii) WAÐAdams, Benton, Chelan, Clark, Cowlitz, Douglas, Franklin, Grant, Kittitas, Klickitat, Okanogan, Pacific, Skamania, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Yakima. (9) Snake River Basin steelhead ................................................ (i) IDÐAdams, Blaine, Clearwater, Custer, Idaho, Latah, Lemhi, Lewis, Nez Perce, and Valley. (ii) ORÐClatsop, Columbia, Gilliam, Hood River, Morrow, Mult- nomah, Sherman, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, and Wasco. (iii) WAÐAsotin, Benton, Clark, Columbia, Cowlitz, Franklin, Garfield, Klickitat, Pacific, Skamania, Walla Walla, Wahkiakum, and Whitman. (10) Middle Columbia River steelhead ........................................ (i) ORÐClatsop, Columbia, Crook, Gilliam, Grant, Hood River, Jefferson, Morrow, Multnomah, Sherman, Umatilla, Union, Wallowa, Wasco, and Wheeler. (ii) WAÐBenton, Clark, Cowlitz, Columbia, Franklin, King, Kittitas, Klickitat, Lewis, Pacific, Pierce, Skamania, Wahkiakum, Walla Walla, and Yakima. (11) Lower Columbia River steelhead ......................................... (i) ORÐClackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Hood River, Marion, and Multnomah. (ii) WAÐClark, Cowlitz, Klickitat, Lewis, Pacific, Skamania, and Wahkiakum. (12) Upper Willamette River steelhead ....................................... (i) ORÐBenton, Clackamas, Clatsop, Columbia, Linn, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Tillamook, Washington, and Yamhill. (ii) WAÐClark, Cowlitz, Pacific, and Wahkiakum. (13) Oregon Coast coho salmon ................................................. ORÐBenton, Clatsop, Columbia, Coos, Curry, Douglas, Lane, Oregon Lincoln, Polk, Tillamook, Washington, and Yamhill. (b) Critical habitat boundaries. Critical by the ordinary high-water line (33 habitat includes the stream channels CFR 319.11). In areas where ordinary within the designated stream reaches, high-water line has not been defined, and includes a lateral extent as defined the lateral extent will be defined by 462 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:01 Jan 05, 2011 Jkt 220227 PO 00000 Frm 00472 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\50\220227.XXX ofr150 PsN: PC150 National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.212 the bankfull elevation. Bankfull ele- (iii) Juvenile and adult forage, in- vation is the level at which water be- cluding aquatic invertebrates and gins to leave the channel and move fishes, supporting growth and matura- into the floodplain and is reached at a tion. discharge which generally has a recur- (5) Nearshore marine areas free of ob- rence interval of 1 to 2 years on the an- struction and excessive predation with: nual flood series. Critical habitat in (i) Water quality and quantity condi- lake areas is defined by the perimeter tions and forage, including aquatic in- of the water body as displayed on vertebrates and fishes, supporting standard 1:24,000 scale topographic growth and maturation; and maps or the elevation of ordinary high (ii) Natural cover such as submerged water, whichever is greater. In estua- and overhanging large wood, aquatic rine and nearshore marine areas crit- vegetation, large rocks and boulders, ical habitat includes areas contiguous and side channels. with the shoreline from the line of ex- (6) Offshore marine areas with water treme high water out to a depth no quality conditions and forage, includ- greater than 30 meters relative to ing aquatic invertebrates and fishes, mean lower low water. supporting growth and maturation. (c) Primary constituent elements. With- (d) Exclusion of Indian lands. Critical in these areas, the primary constituent habitat does not include habitat areas elements essential for the conservation on Indian lands. The Indian lands spe- of these ESUs are those sites and habi- cifically excluded from critical habitat tat components that support one or are those defined in the Secretarial more life stages, including: Order, including: (1) Freshwater spawning sites with (1) Lands held in trust by the United water quantity and quality conditions States for the benefit of any Indian and substrate supporting spawning, in- tribe; cubation and larval development; (2) Land held in trust by the United (2) Freshwater rearing sites with: States for any Indian Tribe or indi- (i) Water quantity and floodplain vidual subject to restrictions by the connectivity to form and maintain United States against alienation; physical habitat conditions and sup- (3) Fee lands, either within or outside port juvenile growth and mobility; the reservation boundaries, owned by (ii) Water quality and forage sup- the tribal government; and porting juvenile development; and (4) Fee lands within the reservation (iii) Natural cover such as shade, sub- boundaries owned by individual Indi- merged and overhanging large wood, ans. log jams and beaver dams, aquatic (e) Land owned or controlled by the De- vegetation, large rocks and boulders, partment of Defense. Critical habitat side channels, and undercut banks. does not include any areas subject to (3) Freshwater migration corridors an approved Integrated Natural Re- free of obstruction and excessive preda- source Management Plan or associated tion with water quantity and quality with Department of Defense easements conditions and natural cover such as or right-of-ways. In areas within Navy submerged and overhanging large security zones identified at 33 CFR 334 wood, aquatic vegetation, large rocks that are outside the areas described and boulders, side channels, and under- above, critical habitat is only des- cut banks supporting juvenile and ignated within a narrow nearshore zone adult mobility and survival; from the line of extreme high tide (4) Estuarine areas free of obstruc- down to the line of mean lower low tion and excessive predation with: water. The specific sites addressed in- (i) Water quality, water quantity, clude: and salinity conditions supporting ju- (1) Naval Submarine Base, Bangor; venile and adult physiological transi- (2) Naval Undersea Warfare Center, tions between fresh- and saltwater; Keyport; (ii) Natural cover such as submerged (3) Naval Ordnance Center, Port and overhanging large wood, aquatic Hadlock (Indian Island); vegetation, large rocks and boulders, (4) Naval Radio Station, Jim Creek; side channels; and (5) Naval Fuel Depot, Manchester; 463 VerDate Mar<15>2010 11:01 Jan 05, 2011 Jkt 220227 PO 00000 Frm 00473 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\50\220227.XXX ofr150 PsN: PC150 § 226.212 50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–10 Edition) (6) Naval Air Station Whidbey Island; areas defined in the following sub- (7) Naval Air Station, Everett; basins: (8) Bremerton Naval Hospital; (1) Nooksack Subbasin 17110004—(i) (9) Fort Lewis (Army); Upper North Fork Nooksack River Water- (10) Pier 23 (Army); shed 1711000401. Outlet(s) = North Fork (11) Yakima Training Center (Army); Nooksack River (Lat 48.9055, Long (12) Puget Sound Naval Shipyard; –121.9886) upstream to endpoint(s) in: (13) Naval Submarine Base Bangor se- Boyd Creek (48.8998, –121.8640); Canyon curity zone; Creek (48.9366, –121.9451); Cascade Creek (14) Strait of Juan de Fuca naval air- (48.8996, –121.8621); Cornell Creek to-surface weapon range, restricted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mohawk River Watershed – HUC-12
    ID Number Name of Mohawk Watershed 1 Switz Kill 2 Flat Creek 3 Headwaters West Creek 4 Kayaderosseras Creek 5 Little Schoharie Creek 6 Headwaters Mohawk River 7 Headwaters Cayadutta Creek 8 Lansing Kill 9 North Creek 10 Little West Kill 11 Irish Creek 12 Auries Creek 13 Panther Creek 14 Hinckley Reservoir 15 Nowadaga Creek 16 Wheelers Creek 17 Middle Canajoharie Creek 18 Honnedaga 19 Roberts Creek 20 Headwaters Otsquago Creek 21 Mill Creek 22 Lewis Creek 23 Upper East Canada Creek 24 Shakers Creek 25 King Creek 26 Crane Creek 27 South Chuctanunda Creek 28 Middle Sprite Creek 29 Crum Creek 30 Upper Canajoharie Creek 31 Manor Kill 32 Vly Brook 33 West Kill 34 Headwaters Batavia Kill 35 Headwaters Flat Creek 36 Sterling Creek 37 Lower Ninemile Creek 38 Moyer Creek 39 Sixmile Creek 40 Cincinnati Creek 41 Reall Creek 42 Fourmile Brook 43 Poentic Kill 44 Wilsey Creek 45 Lower East Canada Creek 46 Middle Ninemile Creek 47 Gooseberry Creek 48 Mother Creek 49 Mud Creek 50 North Chuctanunda Creek 51 Wharton Hollow Creek 52 Wells Creek 53 Sandsea Kill 54 Middle East Canada Creek 55 Beaver Brook 56 Ferguson Creek 57 West Creek 58 Fort Plain 59 Ox Kill 60 Huntersfield Creek 61 Platter Kill 62 Headwaters Oriskany Creek 63 West Kill 64 Headwaters South Branch West Canada Creek 65 Fly Creek 66 Headwaters Alplaus Kill 67 Punch Kill 68 Schenevus Creek 69 Deans Creek 70 Evas Kill 71 Cripplebush Creek 72 Zimmerman Creek 73 Big Brook 74 North Creek 75 Upper Ninemile Creek 76 Yatesville Creek 77 Concklin Brook 78 Peck Lake-Caroga Creek 79 Metcalf Brook 80 Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Seymour Fitch and Elizabeth Hoyt
    The Descendants of Seymour Fitch and Elizabeth Hoyt of New Canaan, Connecticut A CONTRIBUTION TO THE EARLY HISTORY OF WALTON, NEW YORK by EDWARD FITCH Clinton, Ne,v York 1939 From WALTON QUADRANGLE, U. S. Geological Survey. CONTENTS Page PREFACE 5 INTRODUCTORY Seymour Fitch 7 The Settlement in Walton 8 The Catskill Turnpike 10 An Alternative Route 10 Thaddeus Hoyt of Walton 11 The First Homes 13 The Elizabeth Fitch Sampler 15 -Characterization 15 GENEALOGICAL RECORD Seymour Fitch, II 19 Lindall Fitch 29 Ezra Fitch 36 Nathaniel Fitch 37 Asa Fitch 50 Hannah Fitch (Benedict) 88 GENEALOGICAL CHARTS 89 WORKS OF REFERENCE 103 • • • m 2. s~"" ...QI.., ~\,; • :s; ~~ ...u, ~ • .::::,.~f===·======·~• • I • • • • • EU.:;QPAS T'Jc. • ~ ••• 'I I ... • • • MAP OF WALTON in 1842 Courtesy of the Walton Reporter PREFACE The first impulse to the completion of this work came from seeing a brief family record kept by Mary Esther (White) Weed, late of \Valton, N. Y., which showed in tabu­ lar forn1 the six children of Seymour Fitch and Elizabeth Hoyt, with their children. That simple record has been grad­ ually elaborated. The greatest single c~ntribution was made by Elizabeth (More) Cumming, late of Deposit, N. Y., who in 1934 put into my hands the material about the family of her grand­ mother, Elizabeth Betts (Fitch) Alverson. That material has been used as she furnished it, ,vith a few later additions. Others who have been helpful by providing family records in written form are: Miss Susan E. Wakeman, Brooklyn, N. Y.; Mrs. Olive (Green) Gallentine, late of Morrison, Ill; Miss Emma Brisack, Binghamton, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications
    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
    [Show full text]
  • Summit County, CO PERMITS ISSUED for the Period 1/1/2001
    3/29/2012 Summit County, CO Page 1 9:10:02AM PERMITS ISSUED For the Period 1/1/2001 thru 12/31/2001 Permit Number Permit Type Site Address Application Date Subtype Parcel Number Issue Date Status of Permit Subdivision Name Valuation Total Fees Fees Paid B00-0019 SFR 271 Elk Cir 154 412,243.10 3,017.10 3,017.10 01/25/2000 NONE 2095-2240-08-024 02/26/2001 FINAL NEW OLD KEYSTONE GOLF COURSE Contact Type Contact Name Contact Address Phone Number CONTRACTOR MCCREREY & ROBERTS PO BOX 1082, FRISCO, CO 80443 (970) 668-0686 OWNER MCCREREY AND ROBERT PO BOX 1092, FRISCO, CO 80443 (000) 668-0686 B00-0121 SFR 80 Black Diamond Trl 1291 182,249.10 1,458.00 1,458.00 04/14/2000 NONE 2097-1430-06-001 05/16/2001 FINAL WILDERNEST #2 Contact Type Contact Name Contact Address Phone Number CONTRACTOR SUMMIT HOMES DEVELO PO BOX 5265, FRISCO, CO 80443 OWNER PROSPECTOR VILLAGE LLPO BOX 5265, FRISCO, CO 80443 (000) 668-1590 B00-0142 SFR 70 Black Diamond Trl 1291 205,067.00 1,640.53 1,640.53 04/19/2000 NONE 2097-1430-06-001 05/16/2001 FINAL WILDERNEST #2 Contact Type Contact Name Contact Address Phone Number CONTRACTOR SUMMIT HOMES DEVELO PO BOX 5265, FRISCO, CO 80443 OWNER PROSPECTOR VILLAGE LLPO BOX 5265, FRISCO, CO 80443 (000) 668-1590 B00-0143 SFR 70 Black Diamond Trl 1291 157,656.80 1,261.25 1,261.25 04/19/2000 NONE 2097-1430-06-001 05/16/2001 FINAL WILDERNEST #2 Contact Type Contact Name Contact Address Phone Number CONTRACTOR SUMMIT HOMES DEVELO PO BOX 5265, FRISCO, CO 80443 OWNER PROSPECTOR VILLAGE LLPO BOX 5265, FRISCO, CO 80443 (000) 668-1590 B00-0144
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Upper Columbia River Basins Critical Habitat Unit
    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 10. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Upper Columbia River Basins Critical Habitat Unit 10.1 Methow River Critical Habitat Subunit ....................................................................... 325 10.2. Chelan River Critical Habitat Subunit ......................................................................... 337 10.3. Entiat River Critical Habitat Subunit ........................................................................... 341 10.4. Wenatchee River Critical Habitat Subunit ................................................................... 345 323 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 10 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 10. Upper Columbia River Basins Critical Habitat Unit The Upper Columbia River Basins CHU includes the entire drainages of three CHSUs in central and north-central Washington on the east slopes of the Cascade Range and east of the Columbia River between Wenatchee, Washington, and the Okanogan River drainage: (1) Wenatchee River CHSU in Chelan County; (2) Entiat River CHSU in Chelan County; and (3) Methow River CHSU in Okanogan County. The Upper Columbia River Basins CHU also includes the Lake Chelan and Okanogan basins which historically provided spawning and rearing and FMO habitat and currently the Chelan Basin is essential and provides for FMO habitat to support migratory bull trout in this CHU. No critical habitat is proposed in the Okanogan River at this time. Bull trout have been recently observed in the Okanogan River near Osoyoos Lake, but it is unclear if it is essential habitat and what role this drainage may play in recovery. A total of 1,074.9 km (667.9 mi) of streams and 1,033.2 ha (2,553.1 ac) of lake surface area in this CHU are proposed as critical habitat to provide for spawning and rearing, FMO habitat to support three core areas essential for conservation and recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the CHELAN 30-MINUTE by 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON by R
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1661 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CHELAN 30-MINUTE BY 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R. W. Tabor, V. A. Frizzell, Jr., J. T. Whetten, R. B. Waitt, D. A. Swanson, G. R. Byerly, D. B. Booth, M. J. Hetherington, and R. E. Zartman INTRODUCTION Bedrock of the Chelan 1:100,000 quadrangle displays a long and varied geologic history (fig. 1). Pioneer geologic work in the quadrangle began with Bailey Willis (1887, 1903) and I. C. Russell (1893, 1900). A. C. Waters (1930, 1932, 1938) made the first definitive geologic studies in the area (fig. 2). He mapped and described the metamorphic rocks and the lavas of the Columbia River Basalt Group in the vicinity of Chelan as well as the arkoses within the Chiwaukum graben (fig. 1). B. M. Page (1939a, b) detailed much of the structure and petrology of the metamorphic and igneous rocks in the Chiwaukum Mountains, further described the arkoses, and, for the first time, defined the alpine glacial stages in the area. C. L. Willis (1950, 1953) was the first to recognize the Chiwaukum graben, one of the more significant structural features of the region. The pre-Tertiary schists and gneisses are continuous with rocks to the north included in the Skagit Metamorphic Suite of Misch (1966, p. 102-103). Peter Misch and his students established a framework of North Cascade metamorphic geology which underlies much of our construct, especially in the western part of the quadrangle. Our work began in 1975 and was essentially completed in 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012-2017: Metro North East
    Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17: Metro North East Region A new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours © Copyright State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the Office of Environment and Heritage and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS) is part of the Office of Environment and Heritage. Throughout this strategy, references to NPWS should be taken to mean NPWS carrying out functions on behalf of the Director General of the Department of Premier and Cabinet, and the Minister for the Environment. For further information contact: Metro North East Region Metropolitan and Mountains Branch National Parks and Wildlife Service Office of Environment and Heritage PO Box 3031 Asquith NSW 2077 Phone: (02) 9457 8900 Report pollution and environmental incidents Environment Line: 131 555 (NSW only) or [email protected] See also www.environment.nsw.gov.au/pollution Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 PO Box A290, Sydney South, NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Phone: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978 1 74293 625 3 OEH 2012/0374 August 2013 This plan may be cited as: OEH 2012, Regional Pest Management Strategy 2012–17, Metro North East Region: a new approach for reducing impacts on native species and park neighbours, Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney.
    [Show full text]
  • Lane Cove National Park
    Draft Plan of Management Lane Cove National Park Lane Cove National Park Draft Plan of Management NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service September 2012 Acknowledgements The NPWS acknowledges that this park is in the traditional country of the Guringai and Darug peoples. This plan of management was prepared by staff of the Lane Cove Area of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), part of the Office of Environment and Heritage, Department of Premier and Cabinet. FRONT COVER: The Lane Cove River at the boatshed, NPWS For additional information or any inquiries about this park or this plan of management, contact the NPWS Lane Cove Area Office, Lady Game Drive, Chatswood West 2067 or by phone on (02) 8448 0400. Disclaimer: This publication is for discussion and comment only. Publication indicates the proposals are under consideration and are open for public discussion. Any statements made in this draft publication are made in good faith and do not render the NPWS liable for any loss or damage. Provisions in the final management plan may not be the same as those in this draft plan. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 © Copyright State of NSW and the Office of Environment and Heritage NSW: Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment. ISBN 978 1 74293 733 5 OEH 2012/0588 Printed on recycled paper INVITATION TO COMMENT The National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW Act) requires that a plan of management be prepared that outlines how an area will be managed by the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS).
    [Show full text]
  • Epping to Thornleigh Third Track Environmental Impact Statement
    Epping to Thornleigh Third Track Environmental Impact Statement 14. Surface and groundwater This chapter considers the potential impacts of the ETTT proposal on surface and groundwater including water quality. 14.1 Existing conditions 14.1.1 Surface water and drainage The proposal site is located predominantly within the upstream areas of the Byles and Zig Zag Creek catchments, and downstream of the Upper Devlins Creek catchment. Surface waterways within the vicinity of the proposal site include Devlins Creek, Byles Creek, Zig Zag Creek and a number of smaller unnamed overland flow paths. These creeks are shown on Figure 14.1 except Zig Zag Creek which is located just to the north of the figure extent. The external catchments between Epping Station and Pennant Hills Road generally drain from the western side of the corridor to the eastern side, towards Devlins Creek and Byles Creek. These creeks discharge to the Lane Cove River. North of Pennant Hills Station, the catchment falls from the eastern to the western side towards Zig Zag Creek, which discharges into Berowra Creek. The ETTT proposal would pass through undulating terrain, with Devlins Creek the only major watercourse crossing the corridor. Flooding of the creek is unlikely to impact the existing rail corridor, as the creek is located more than 20 metres below the corridor level. No works are proposed in Devlins Creek. There are currently 19 drainage culverts which convey surface water across the railway corridor. Due to the construction of the third track, 14 of these culverts would be required to be extended. 14.1.2 Surface water quality Water quality monitoring is undertaken at a number of locations within the Hornsby LGA, and the results are provided in Council’s Annual Water Quality Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of Washington - Northwest Quadrant
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF WASHINGTON - NORTHWEST QUADRANT by JOE D. DRAGOVICH, ROBERT L. LOGAN, HENRY W. SCHASSE, TIMOTHY J. WALSH, WILLIAM S. LINGLEY, JR., DAVID K . NORMAN, WENDY J. GERSTEL, THOMAS J. LAPEN, J. ERIC SCHUSTER, AND KAREN D. MEYERS WASHINGTON DIVISION Of GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGIC MAP GM-50 2002 •• WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENTOF 4 r Natural Resources Doug Sutherland· Commissioner of Pubhc Lands Division ol Geology and Earth Resources Ron Telssera, Slate Geologist WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES Ron Teissere, State Geologist David K. Norman, Assistant State Geologist GEOLOGIC MAP OF WASHINGTON­ NORTHWEST QUADRANT by Joe D. Dragovich, Robert L. Logan, Henry W. Schasse, Timothy J. Walsh, William S. Lingley, Jr., David K. Norman, Wendy J. Gerstel, Thomas J. Lapen, J. Eric Schuster, and Karen D. Meyers This publication is dedicated to Rowland W. Tabor, U.S. Geological Survey, retired, in recognition and appreciation of his fundamental contributions to geologic mapping and geologic understanding in the Cascade Range and Olympic Mountains. WASHINGTON DIVISION OF GEOLOGY AND EARTH RESOURCES GEOLOGIC MAP GM-50 2002 Envelope photo: View to the northeast from Hurricane Ridge in the Olympic Mountains across the eastern Strait of Juan de Fuca to the northern Cascade Range. The Dungeness River lowland, capped by late Pleistocene glacial sedi­ ments, is in the center foreground. Holocene Dungeness Spit is in the lower left foreground. Fidalgo Island and Mount Erie, composed of Jurassic intrusive and Jurassic to Cretaceous sedimentary rocks of the Fidalgo Complex, are visible as the first high point of land directly across the strait from Dungeness Spit.
    [Show full text]
  • Example SSO XML Instance Document
    Example SSO XML Instance Document Alabama Department of Environment Management P.O. Box 301463 Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1463 Tel: (334) 279-3049 Fax: (334) 271-7950 email: [email protected] ADEM Example SSO XML Instance Document Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2 SSO XML Template File ............................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Download Facility Specific “Blank” SSO XML Template File from E2 ................................................................. 4 2.2 Generate SSO XML Template from SSO Schema .............................................................................................. 4 3 SSO XML File Population ......................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Meta Data Section ................................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Receiver Data Section ......................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Facility Identification Section ................................................................................................................................ 8 3.4 Report Identification
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H7878
    H7878 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE July 17, 2007 center even exists. We don’t know if it The Acting CHAIRMAN. Pursuant to modifications committed to conference: even exists, if it’s created by this ear- clause 6 of rule XVIII, further pro- Messrs. Reyes, Cramer, and Hoekstra. mark. ceedings on the amendment offered by From the Committee on Science and Tech- Concurrent Technology has been the the gentleman from Arizona will be nology, for consideration of secs. 703, 1301, recipient of millions upon millions of 1464, 1467, and 1507 of the Senate amendment, postponed. and modifications committed to conference: dollars over the years. The executives Mr. VISCLOSKY. Mr. Chairman, I Messrs. Gordon of Tennessee, Wu, and in Concurrent Technology contribute move that the Committee do now rise. Gingrey. handsomely to Members of Congress. The motion was agreed to. From the Committee on Transportation So it receives a lot of earmarks. It Accordingly, the Committee rose; and Infrastructure, for consideration of Ti- seems to be an earmark incubator of and the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. tles I–III, sec. 1002, and Title XI of the House some type, an earmark that begets DAVIS of Illinois) having assumed the bill, and secs. 202, 301, Title IV, secs. 801–803, 807, 901, 1001, 1002, 1101–1103, 1422–1424, 1426, more earmarks. chair, Mr. TIERNEY, Chairman of the And yet we have the report that 1427, 1429, 1430, 1433, 1436–1438, 1441, 1443, 1444, Committee of the Whole House on the 1446, 1449, 1464, 1473, 1503, and 1605 of the Sen- comes with the bill that doesn’t even state of the Union, reported that that mention Concurrent Technology.
    [Show full text]