A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2013 Recommendations by the Infectio

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2013 Recommendations by the Infectio Clinical Infectious Diseases Advance Access published July 10, 2013 IDSA GUIDELINES A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2013 Recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)a Ellen Jo Baron,1,2 J. Michael Miller,3 Melvin P. Weinstein,4 Sandra S. Richter,5 Peter H. Gilligan,6 Richard B. Thomson Jr.,7 Paul Bourbeau,8 Karen C. Carroll,9 Sue C. Kehl,10 W. Michael Dunne,11 Barbara Robinson-Dunn,12 Joseph D. Schwartzman,13 14 15 16 17 17 17 Kimberle C. Chapin, James W. Snyder, Betty A. Forbes, Robin Patel, Jon E. Rosenblatt, and Bobbi S. Pritt Downloaded from 1Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; 2Cepheid, R&D, Sunnyvale, California; 3Microbiology Technical Services, LLC, Dunwoody, Georgia; 4Department of Medicine and Pathology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey; 5Department of Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; 6Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7Department of Pathology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois; 8Scientific Affairs, BD Diagnostics, Sparks, Maryland; 9Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; 10Department of 11 Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; bioMerieux, Inc., Durham, North Carolina, and Department of Pathology and http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri; 12Department of Pathology, William Beaumont Hospital to Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan; 13Department of Pathology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire; 14Department of Pathology, Brown Alpert Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island; 15Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky; 16Department of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia; and 17Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota The critical role of the microbiology laboratory in infectious disease diagnosis calls for a close, positive working relationship between the physician and the microbiologists who provide enormous value to the health care team. This document, developed by both laboratory and clinical experts, provides information on which tests by guest on July 11, 2013 are valuable and in which contexts, and on tests that add little or no value for diagnostic decisions. Sections are divided into anatomic systems, including Bloodstream Infections and Infections of the Cardiovascular System, Central Nervous System Infections, Ocular Infections, Soft Tissue Infections of the Head and Neck, Upper Re- spiratory Infections, Lower Respiratory Tract infections, Infections of the Gastrointestinal Tract, Intraabdomi- nal Infections, Bone and Joint Infections, Urinary Tract Infections, Genital Infections, and Skin and Soft Tissue Infections; or into etiologic agent groups, including Tickborne Infections, Viral Syndromes, and Blood and Tissue Parasite Infections. Each section contains introductory concepts, a summary of key points, and de- tailed tables that list suspected agents; the most reliable tests to order; the samples (and volumes) to collect in order of preference; specimen transport devices, procedures, times, and temperatures; and detailed notes on specific issues regarding the test methods, such as when tests are likely to require a specialized laboratory or have prolonged turnaround times. There is redundancy among the tables and sections, as many agents and assay choices overlap. The document is intended to serve as a reference to guide physicians in choosing tests that will aid them to diagnose infectious diseases in their patients. Keywords. laboratory diagnosis; microbiology testing; specimen processing; physician-laboratory communica- tion; medical laboratories. Received 19 April 2013; accepted 22 April 2013. aAlthough accurate and authoritative, IDSA considers adherence to the recom- mendations in this guide to be voluntary, with the ultimate determination regarding Clinical Infectious Diseases their application to be made by the physician in the light of each patient's individual © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious circumstances. Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: Correspondence: Ellen Jo Baron, PhD, Cepheid, R&D, 1315 Chesapeake Terrace, [email protected]. Sunnyvale, CA 94089, USA ([email protected]). DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit278 Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Lab • CID • 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table Introduction-1. Transport Issues (General Guide)a Introduction Collection Device, Unlike other areas of the diagnostic laboratory, clinical microbi- Specimen Specimen Temperature, and ology is a science of interpretive judgment that is becoming Type Required Ideal Transport Time more complex, not less. Even with the advent of laboratory auto- Aerobic bacterial Tissue, fluid, aspirate Sterile container, RT, culture biopsy, etc immediately mation and the integration of genomics and proteomics in mi- Swab (2nd choice) – Swab transport crobiology, interpretation of results still depends on the quality flocked swabs are device, RT, 2 h of the specimens received for analysis. Prokaryotic microorgan- recommended isms, while genetically less complex than multicellular eukary- Aerobic and Tissue, fluid, aspirate, Sterile anaerobic anaerobic biopsy, etc container, RT, otes, are uniquely suited to adapt to environments where bacterial culture immediately antibiotics and host responses apply pressures that encourage Swab (2nd choice) – Anaerobic swab their survival. A laboratory instrument may or may not detect flocked swabs are transport device, effective RT, 2 h those mutations, so a specialist in microbiology is needed to facil- Fungus culture; Tissue, fluid, aspirate, Sterile container, RT, itate microbiology laboratory result interpretation. Clearly, all AFB culture biopsy, etc 2h microbes grow, multiply, and die very quickly. If any of those Swab (2nd choice) (for Swab transport events occur during specimen collection, transport, or storage, yeast and device, RT, 2 h superficial the results of analysis will be compromised and interpretation mycobacterial could be misleading. Therefore, attention to preanalytical speci- infections only) Downloaded from men management in microbiology is critical to accuracy. Virus culture Tissue, fluid, aspirate, Viral transport media, biopsy, etc on ice, immediately fi Physicians need con dence that the results provided by the Swab – flocked swabs Virus swab transport microbiology laboratory are accurate, significant, and clinically are recommended device, RT, 2 h relevant. Anything less is below the community standard of care. Suspected agent Refer to Centers for Disease Control and of bioterrorism Prevention website: http://emergency.cdc. http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ In order to provide that level of quality, however, the laboratory gov/documents/PPTResponse/ requires that all microbiology specimens be properly selected, col- table2specimenselection.pdf lected, and transported to optimize analysis and interpretation. Serology 5 mL serum Clot tube, RT, 2 h Because result interpretation in microbiology depends entirely on Antigen test As described in the Closed container, laboratory RT, 2 h the quality of the specimen submitted for analysis, specimen specimen collection management cannot be left to chance, and those that collect spec- manual imens for microbiologic analysis must be aware of what the phy- NAAT 5 mL plasma EDTA tube, RT, 2 h sician needs as well as what the laboratory needs, including Other specimen Closed container, by guest on July 11, 2013 RT, 2 h ensuring that specimens arrive at the laboratory for analysis as quickly as possible after collection (Introduction-Table 1). Abbreviations: NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; RT, Room Temperature. a Contact the microbiology laboratory regarding appropriate collection and At an elementary level, the physician needs answers to 3 very transport devices and procedures since transport media such as Cary-Blair or basic questions from the laboratory: Is my patient’s illness parasite preservative transport for stool specimens, boric acid for urines, caused by a microbe? If so, what is it? What is the susceptibility specialized containers for Mycobacterium tuberculosis are often critical for successful examination. The time from collection to transport listed will profile of the organism so therapy can be targeted? To meet optimize results; longer times may compromise results. those needs, the laboratory requires very different information. The microbiology laboratory needs a specimen that has been appropriately selected, collected, and transported to the labora- tory for analysis. Caught in the middle, between the physician interactions. Clearly, the best outcomes for patients are the and laboratory, are those who select and collect the specimen result of strong partnerships between the clinician and the lab- and who may not know or understand what the physician or oratorian specialist. This document illustrates this partnership the laboratory needs to do their work. Enhancing the quality of and emphasizes the importance of appropriate specimen man- the specimen is everyone’s job,
Recommended publications
  • Parinaud's Oculoglandular Syndrome
    Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Case Report Parinaud’s Oculoglandular Syndrome: A Case in an Adult with Flea-Borne Typhus and a Review M. Kevin Dixon 1, Christopher L. Dayton 2 and Gregory M. Anstead 3,4,* 1 Baylor Scott & White Clinic, 800 Scott & White Drive, College Station, TX 77845, USA; [email protected] 2 Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA; [email protected] 3 Medical Service, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA 4 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-210-567-4666; Fax: +1-210-567-4670 Received: 7 June 2020; Accepted: 24 July 2020; Published: 29 July 2020 Abstract: Parinaud’s oculoglandular syndrome (POGS) is defined as unilateral granulomatous conjunctivitis and facial lymphadenopathy. The aims of the current study are to describe a case of POGS with uveitis due to flea-borne typhus (FBT) and to present a diagnostic and therapeutic approach to POGS. The patient, a 38-year old man, presented with persistent unilateral eye pain, fever, rash, preauricular and submandibular lymphadenopathy, and laboratory findings of FBT: hyponatremia, elevated transaminase and lactate dehydrogenase levels, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia. His condition rapidly improved after starting doxycycline. Soon after hospitalization, he was diagnosed with uveitis, which responded to topical prednisolone. To derive a diagnostic and empiric therapeutic approach to POGS, we reviewed the cases of POGS from its various causes since 1976 to discern epidemiologic clues and determine successful diagnostic techniques and therapies; we found multiple cases due to cat scratch disease (CSD; due to Bartonella henselae) (twelve), tularemia (ten), sporotrichosis (three), Rickettsia conorii (three), R.
    [Show full text]
  • View Tickborne Diseases Sample Report
    1360 Bayport Ave, Ste B. San Carlos, CA 94070 1(866) 364-0963 | [email protected] | www. vibrant-wellness.com PATIENT PROVIDER NAME: DEMO REPORT GENDER: Male PRACTICE NAME: Vibrant IT4 Practice DATE OF BIRTH: 04/14/1998 AGE: 22 PROVIDER NAME: Demo Client, DDD (999994) ADDRESS: TEST STREET, TEST CITY, KY- 42437. ACCESSION ID: 2009220006 PHLEBOTOMIST: 607 SPECIMEN COLLECTION TIME: 09-21-2020 11:14 SPECIMEN RECEIVED TIME: 09-22-2020 05:14 FINAL REPORT TIME: 09-25-2020 15:56 FASTING: FASTING Your Vibrant Wellness TickBorne 2.0 panel results are enclosed. These results are intended to aid in the diagnosis of tickborne diseases by your healthcare provider. The Vibrant Tickborne Diseases panel tests for IgG and IgM antibodies for Borreliosis/Lyme disease as well as co-infection(s) and opportunistic infections with other tick-borne illnesses along with detection of DNA of the species causing these infections. The Vibrant Immunochip test is a semiquantitative assay that detects IgG and IgM antibodies in human serum. The PCR Test is a real-time PCR Assay designed for qualitative detection of infectious group- specific DNA in clinical samples. Interpretation of Report: The test results of antibody levels to the individual antigens are calculated by comparing the average intensity of the individual antibody to that of a reference population and cut-off chosen for each protein. Reference ranges have been established using a well characterized set of more than 300 serum samples and antibodies to specific bacteria tested. The results are displayed as In Control, Moderate, or High Risk.for each antigen tested.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable Diseases and Conditions
    KINGS COUNTY DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC HEALTH 330 CAMPUS DRIVE, HANFORD, CA 93230 REPORTABLE DISEASES AND CONDITIONS Title 17, California Code of Regulations, §2500, requires that known or suspected cases of any of the diseases or conditions listed below are to be reported to the local health jurisdiction within the specified time frame: REPORT IMMEDIATELY BY PHONE During Business Hours: (559) 852-2579 After Hours: (559) 852-2720 for Immediate Reportable Disease and Conditions Anthrax Escherichia coli: Shiga Toxin producing (STEC), Rabies (Specify Human or Animal) Botulism (Specify Infant, Foodborne, Wound, Other) including E. coli O157:H7 Scrombroid Fish Poisoning Brucellosis, Human Flavivirus Infection of Undetermined Species Shiga Toxin (Detected in Feces) Cholera Foodborne Disease (2 or More Cases) Smallpox (Variola) Ciguatera Fish Poisoning Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome Tularemia, human Dengue Virus Infection Influenza, Novel Strains, Human Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (Crimean-Congo, Ebola, Diphtheria Measles (Rubeola) Lassa, and Marburg Viruses) Domonic Acid Poisoning (Amnesic Shellfish Meningococcal Infections Yellow Fever Poisoning) Novel Virus Infection with Pandemic Potential Zika Virus Infection Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning Plague (Specify Human or Animal) Immediately report the occurrence of any unusual disease OR outbreaks of any disease. REPORT BY PHONE, FAX, MAIL WITHIN ONE (1) WORKING DAY Phone: (559) 852-2579 Fax: (559) 589-0482 Mail: 330 Campus Drive, Hanford 93230 Conditions may also be reported electronically via the California
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Case Definitions Infectious Disease
    Arizona Department of Health Services Case Definitions for Reportable Communicable Morbidities 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Definition of Terms Used in Case Classification .......................................................................................................... 6 Definition of Bi-national Case ............................................................................................................................................. 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ............................................... 7 AMEBIASIS ............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 ANTHRAX (β) ......................................................................................................................................................................... 9 ASEPTIC MENINGITIS (viral) ......................................................................................................................................... 11 BASIDIOBOLOMYCOSIS ................................................................................................................................................. 12 BOTULISM, FOODBORNE (β) ....................................................................................................................................... 13 BOTULISM, INFANT (β) ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases/Infections Chancroid
    Sexually Transmitted Diseases/Infections Chancroid Chancroid is a bacterial infection caused by Haemophilus ducreyi. It is spread by sexual contact and results in genital ulcers. Chancroid is a reportable genital ulcer condition that is rarely seen in North Carolina. When infection does occur, it is usually associated with sporadic outbreaks. Chancroid, as well as genital herpes and syphilis, is a risk factor in the transmission of HIV infection. Chancroid lesions may be difficult to distinguish from ulcers caused by genital herpes or syphilis. A physician must therefore diagnose the infection by excluding other diseases with similar symptoms. The combination of a painful genital ulcer and tender suppurative inguinal adenopathy suggests the diagnosis of chancroid. A probable diagnosis of chancroid, for both clinical and surveillance purposes, can be made if all of the following criteria are met: 1) the patient has one or more painful genital ulcers; 2) the patient has no evidence of T. pallidum infection by darkfield examination of ulcer exudate or by a serologic test for syphilis performed at least 7 days after onset of ulcers; 3) the clinical presentation, appearance of genital ulcers and, if present, regional lymphadenopathy are typical for chancroid; and 4) a test for HSV performed on the ulcer exudate is negative. A definitive diagnosis of chancroid requires the identification of H. ducreyi on special culture media that is not widely available from commercial sources; even when these media are used, sensitivity is less than 80 percent. No FDA- cleared PCR test for H. ducreyi is available in the United States, but such testing can be performed by clinical laboratories that have developed their own PCR test and have conducted a CLIA verification study.
    [Show full text]
  • Reportable Disease Surveillance in Virginia, 2013
    Reportable Disease Surveillance in Virginia, 2013 Marissa J. Levine, MD, MPH State Health Commissioner Report Production Team: Division of Surveillance and Investigation, Division of Disease Prevention, Division of Environmental Epidemiology, and Division of Immunization Virginia Department of Health Post Office Box 2448 Richmond, Virginia 23218 www.vdh.virginia.gov ACKNOWLEDGEMENT In addition to the employees of the work units listed below, the Office of Epidemiology would like to acknowledge the contributions of all those engaged in disease surveillance and control activities across the state throughout the year. We appreciate the commitment to public health of all epidemiology staff in local and district health departments and the Regional and Central Offices, as well as the conscientious work of nurses, environmental health specialists, infection preventionists, physicians, laboratory staff, and administrators. These persons report or manage disease surveillance data on an ongoing basis and diligently strive to control morbidity in Virginia. This report would not be possible without the efforts of all those who collect and follow up on morbidity reports. Divisions in the Virginia Department of Health Office of Epidemiology Disease Prevention Telephone: 804-864-7964 Environmental Epidemiology Telephone: 804-864-8182 Immunization Telephone: 804-864-8055 Surveillance and Investigation Telephone: 804-864-8141 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Introduction ......................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Know Your Abcs: a Quick Guide to Reportable Infectious Diseases in Ohio
    Know Your ABCs: A Quick Guide to Reportable Infectious Diseases in Ohio From the Ohio Administrative Code Chapter 3701-3; Effective August 1, 2019 Class A: Diseases of major public health concern because of the severity of disease or potential for epidemic spread – report immediately via telephone upon recognition that a case, a suspected case, or a positive laboratory result exists. • Anthrax • Measles • Rubella (not congenital) • Viral hemorrhagic fever • Botulism, foodborne • Meningococcal disease • Severe acute respiratory (VHF), including Ebola virus • Cholera • Middle East Respiratory syndrome (SARS) disease, Lassa fever, Marburg • Diphtheria Syndrome (MERS) • Smallpox hemorrhagic fever, and • Influenza A – novel virus • Plague • Tularemia Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic infection • Rabies, human fever Any unexpected pattern of cases, suspected cases, deaths or increased incidence of any other disease of major public health concern, because of the severity of disease or potential for epidemic spread, which may indicate a newly recognized infectious agent, outbreak, epidemic, related public health hazard or act of bioterrorism. Class B: Disease of public health concern needing timely response because of potential for epidemic spread – report by the end of the next business day after the existence of a case, a suspected case, or a positive laboratory result is known. • Amebiasis • Carbapenemase-producing • Hepatitis B (perinatal) • Salmonellosis • Arboviral neuroinvasive and carbapenem-resistant • Hepatitis C (non-perinatal) • Shigellosis
    [Show full text]
  • Pdfs/ Ommended That Initial Cultures Focus on Common Pathogens, Pscmanual/9Pscssicurrent.Pdf)
    Clinical Infectious Diseases IDSA GUIDELINE A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiologya J. Michael Miller,1 Matthew J. Binnicker,2 Sheldon Campbell,3 Karen C. Carroll,4 Kimberle C. Chapin,5 Peter H. Gilligan,6 Mark D. Gonzalez,7 Robert C. Jerris,7 Sue C. Kehl,8 Robin Patel,2 Bobbi S. Pritt,2 Sandra S. Richter,9 Barbara Robinson-Dunn,10 Joseph D. Schwartzman,11 James W. Snyder,12 Sam Telford III,13 Elitza S. Theel,2 Richard B. Thomson Jr,14 Melvin P. Weinstein,15 and Joseph D. Yao2 1Microbiology Technical Services, LLC, Dunwoody, Georgia; 2Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 3Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; 4Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; 5Department of Pathology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence; 6Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; 7Department of Pathology, Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta, Georgia; 8Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee; 9Department of Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio; 10Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan; 11Dartmouth- Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; 12Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville, Kentucky; 13Department of Infectious Disease and Global Health, Tufts University, North Grafton, Massachusetts; 14Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois; and 15Departments of Medicine and Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey Contents Introduction and Executive Summary I.
    [Show full text]
  • Principle of Infection
    23/09/56 Principle of Infection La-or Chompuk, M.D. Department of pathology Faculty of Medicine Infection • Definition: Invasion and multiplication of microorganisms in body tissues • No symptom, local cellular injury, localized symptom, dissemination • Mechanism; competitive metabolism, toxins, intracellular replication, immune response 1 23/09/56 Classification of infectious agents: - classification according to structure - classification according to pathogenesis - classification according to site of multiplication Classification according to structure - Prion - Fungi - Viruses - Protozoa, metazoa - Bacteria - Ectoparasite - Rickettsia, chlamydia, mycoplasma 2 23/09/56 Classification according to pathogenesis • Pathogenic agents; - Virulence: the degree of pathogenicity of a microorganism - Indicated by the severity of disease, the ability to invade tissue - high virulence - low virulence • Opportunistic infection Classification according to site of multiplication - obligate intracellular organisms; Prions, viruses, rickettsiae, chlamydia, some protozoa - facultative intracellular organism; Mycobacteria, Actinomyces, Pseudomonas spp. - extracellular organisms; mycoplasma, fungi, bacteria, metazoa 3 23/09/56 Pathogenesis of Infectious Disease -Host - Pathogen; organism or parasite that cause disease Host factors: 1. General factors; socioeconomic status, behavior pattern, occupational, and internal factors 2. Natural defense mechanism; skin and normal flora, respiratory tract and mucociliary mechanism, Hcl production in stomach, or
    [Show full text]
  • IS IT LYME DISEASE, Or TICK-BORNE RELAPSING FEVER?
    IS IT LYME DISEASE, or TICK-BORNE RELAPSING FEVER? Webinar Presented by Joseph J. Burrascano Jr. M.D. Joined by Jyotsna Shah PhD for the Q&A January 2020 Presenters Joseph J. Burrascano Jr. M.D. • Well-known pioneer in the field of tick-borne diseases, active since 1985 • Founding member of ILADS and ILADEF • Active in physician education on all aspects of tick-borne diseases Jyotsna Shah, PhD • President & Laboratory Director of IGeneX Clinical Laboratory • Over 40 Years of Research Experience in Immunology, Molecular Biology & Microbiology • Author of Multiple Publications & Holds More Than 20 Patents • Member of ILRAD as a Post-Doctoral Scientist • Started the First DNA Sequencing Laboratory in E. Africa 2 Poll Question Before we begin, we’d like to ask a poll question. Which one of these Borrelia causes Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever (TBRF)? a) B. mayonii b) B. turicatae c) B. burgdorferi d) B. andersonii e) B. garinii 3 Poll Question Before we begin, we’d like to ask a poll question. Which one of these Borrelia causes Tick-Borne Relapsing Fever (TBRF)? a) B. mayonii - Lyme b) B. turicatae - TBRF c) B. burgdorferi - Lyme d) B. andersonii - Lyme e) B. garinii – Lyme strain in Europe 4 What is TBRF? • Has been defined by clinical presentation • Has been defined by tick vector • Has been defined by genetics • Has been defined by serotype BUT • Each of these has exceptions and limitations! 5 Clinical Presentation of Classic TBRF • “Recurring febrile episodes that last ~3 days and are separated by afebrile periods of ~7 days duration.” • “Each febrile episode involves a “crisis.” During the “chill phase” of the crisis, patients develop very high fever (up to 106.7°F) and may become delirious, agitated, tachycardic and tachypneic.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpes Simplex Virus-Associated Dermatitis with Either High Or Normal Ige Responded Well to Antiviral Therapy: a Study of 787 Quick-Tzanck-Test-Positive Patients
    Article ID: WMC004846 ISSN 2046-1690 Herpes Simplex Virus-Associated Dermatitis with Either High or Normal IgE Responded Well to Antiviral Therapy: A Study of 787 Quick-Tzanck-Test-Positive Patients Peer review status: No Corresponding Author: Dr. Lily Hsiao, Vice president, Moriya Eye and Skin Clinic, 5-7-1, Mizukino, 302-0121 - Japan Submitting Author: Dr. Lily Hsiao, Vice president, Moriya Eye and Skin Clinic, 5-7-1, Mizukino, 302-0121 - Japan Article ID: WMC004846 Article Type: Original Articles Submitted on:20-Mar-2015, 07:33:49 AM GMT Published on: 20-Mar-2015, 07:34:27 AM GMT Article URL: http://www.webmedcentral.com/article_view/4846 Subject Categories:DERMATOLOGY Keywords:herpes simplex virus, quick Tzanck test, erythema multiforme, atopic dermatitis, intrinsic atopic dermatitis How to cite the article:Hsiao L. Herpes Simplex Virus-Associated Dermatitis with Either High or Normal IgE Responded Well to Antiviral Therapy: A Study of 787 Quick-Tzanck-Test-Positive Patients. WebmedCentral DERMATOLOGY 2015;6(3):WMC004846 Copyright: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Source(s) of Funding: None Competing Interests: None Additional Files: HSVADWMC15 WebmedCentral > Original Articles Page 1 of 33 WMC004846 Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 20-Mar-2015, 07:38:29 AM Herpes Simplex Virus-Associated Dermatitis with Either High or Normal IgE Responded Well to Antiviral Therapy: A Study of 787 Quick-Tzanck-Test-Positive Patients Author(s): Hsiao L Abstract Abbreviations Background: The overall age-adjusted 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections and Increased Risk of Co-Infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus
    REVIEW ARTICLE Sexually Transmitted Infections and Increased Risk of Co-infection with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Margaret R.H. Nusbaum, DO, MPH; Robin R. Wallace, MD; Lisa M. Slatt, MEd; Elin C. Kondrad, MD The incidence of trichomoniasis (Trichomonas vaginalis) Clinical Presentation in the United States is estimated at 5 million cases annu- Urethritis, Epididymitis, and Proctitis ally; chlamydia (Chlamydia trachomatis) at 3 million; gon- In men, STIs usually remain confined to the urethra. Symptoms orrhea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae), 650,000; and syphilis (Tre- of urethritis include urethral discharge, dysuria, or urethral ponema pallidum), 70,000. However, most sexually itching. The discharge of nongonococcal urethritis (NGU) is transmitted infections (STIs) are asymptomatic—con- often slight, and may not be apparent without massaging the tributing to underdiagnosis estimated at 50% or more. urethra. Discharge of NGU is usually minimal and gray, white, Diagnosis of an STI signals sexual health risk because an or mucoid rather than yellow. Discharge that is yellow and pre- STI facilitates the transmission and acquisition of other sent in greater volume most often signals infection with N STIs, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). gonorrhoeae. In fact, comorbid STIs increase patients’ susceptibility of Epididymitis presents as acute unilateral testicular pain acquiring and transmitting HIV by two- to fivefold. Sev- and swelling. Clinical findings include tenderness of the epi- eral studies have shown that aggressive STI prevention, didymis and ductus deferens, erythema and edema of the testing, and treatment reduces the transmission of HIV. overlying scrotal skin, urethral discharge, and dysuria. Swelling The authors discuss common clinical presentations, and tenderness may be localized or may extend to the entire screening, diagnosis, and treatment for trichomoniasis, epididymis and surrounding areas, making the epididymis less chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and herpes simplex virus.
    [Show full text]