DOCSLIB.ORG

Bending of Starlight by the Sun

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bending of Starlight by the Sun Bending of Starlight by the Sun By Donald Wortzman ([email protected]) In 1911, Einstein’s first prediction to verify general relativity was the bending of starlight as it passes near a massive object, like the sun. Bending was the same as the Newtonian model might have predicted for a light particle. Because it is not possible to see starlight while the sun is so bright, he suggested that the test be run during a solar eclipse. In 1912, efforts to test his prediction were prevented by cloudy weather at the observation site. In the 1916 paper on general relativity, Einstein also discovered that his 1911 calculation for the bending of light by the sun was off by a factor of two, making the bending of light 1.745 seconds of arc for starlight just grazing the sun. After another failed attempt, in 1919, Sir Arthur Eddington on an island off the coast of Africa and another group in Brazil confirmed Einstein’s prediction. When announced, this prediction captured the imagination of the world and Einstein became an instant celebrity. Had the first attempt in 1912 to make this measurement not been called off by weather, Einstein’s prediction then would have been wrong. One could only wonder what effect that might have had on Einstein’s popularity. GRAVITATIONAL EFFECT ON LIGHT Photons moving in a gravitational field laterally to a massive body, are subject to two distinct, but related deflection mechanisms. (See the following figure) If viewed as a particle having a mass of value E/c 2 where E=h ν, it will experience a gravitational force downward orthogonal to it’s lateral motion, similar to all other matter, resulting in a deflection angle of 2GM/c 2R. This is the deflection mechanism that the equivalence principle addresses. However, because gravity ‘pulls’ towards a point at the center of mass, there is also a horizontal gravitational component, which squeezes its wavefronts together. The force is greater for photons closer to the massive body, making the wavelength shorter and the front velocity larger. The bottom of the front compresses more than the top, moving faster, and producing bending towards the gravitational source. The bending causes an additional deflection angle numerically equal to 2GM/c 2R, making the total deflection 4GM/c 2R, as also predicted by general relativity. An analytical explanation is contained in the next section. For those that don’t accept that photons in motion are affected by gravity, in Einstein's book, “Relativity”, when discussing the bending of light skimming the sun, he writes, “…according to the theory, half of this deflection is produced by the Newtonian field of attraction of the sun, and the other half by the geometrical modification ('curvature') of space caused by the sun.” For those that still not convinced, the analysis could just as easily apply to other neutral sub-atomic particles traveling arbitrarily close to the speed of light, for example, neutrinos, in which some flavors are thought to have a non-zero rest mass. Also, because the gravitational mass and the inertial mass are numerically the same, the bending of the particle’s trajectory is the same independent of the mass value, and even would be the same as for photons. The fact that bending of a neutrino beam can’t be readily measured is irrelevant. GRAVITATIONAL EFFECT ON LIGHT CALCULATION As mentioned, there are two gravitational mechanisms that bend starlight. Imagine a stream of photons nominally moving horizontally at velocity “c” along the x- axis, skimming the sun and heading towards Earth. The Sun’s gravitational force can be separated into two components acting on the photon stream, one vertical and the other horizontal. Each causes the stream to bend. However, correction terms to the nominal paths are so small that they can be approximated without regard to the small changes of the nominal path. Figure – Gravitational Deflection of Light The vertical component deflects the stream downward toward the Sun as it heads towards earth. For simplicity, only the second half from the point of tangency to the Sun, onward to Earth need be considered. The section from the star to the sun is the mirror image, doubling the result. (See above diagram – Upper left)) The gravitational vertical acceleration component on each photon, treated as a particle, is: 2 (1) a y = [F g/m] [cos θ] = [GMm/mr ] [cos θ] where: r 2 = [x 2+R 2] and: R is the distance from the sun’s center to the closest point of the photon stream. and: a y is vertical acceleration component and: m is the imputed mass (hf/c 2) of a photon in flight and: θ is the angle between r and the vertical y direction and: G is the gravitational constant and: M is the mass of the sun The velocity in the vertical direction is the integral of acceleration over time: 2 2 (2) v y = ∫ a y dt = ∫GM/[x +R ] * [cos θ]dt where: [cos θ] = R/[x 2+R 2]1/2 and: dt = [dx][dt/dx] = dx/c Collecting terms: 2 2 -3/2 (3) v y = GMR/c ∫[x +R ] * dx The angular deflection is: 2 2 2 -3/2 (4) α y = vy/c = GMR/c ∫[x +R ] * dx Integrating: 2 2 2 1/2 (5) α y = GM/c * x/R[x +R ] Evaluating between minus infinity (star) and plus infinity (earth): 2 2 2 (6) α earth = GM/Rc + GM/Rc = 2GM/Rc If gravity pulled vertically and not to a point, this would be the total deflection, but that is not the case. As a “wave,” the photons are spread out comprising a wave front, and moving perpendicular to the front. Even though the signal speed of light doesn’t change, work is done, changing the frequency, and the energy of the photons accordingly. (See above diagram – Upper right) Consequently, to derive the expression: 2 2 (7) E x = ∫ F x dx = ∫GMm/[x +R ] * [sin θ]dx where: [sin θ] = x/[x 2+R 2]1/2 and: E x is the change in photon’s energy and: λx is the change in photon’s wavelegnth Substituting and collecting terms: 2 2 -3/2 (8) E x = GMm/ ∫x[x +R ] * dx The fractional change in energy: 2 2 2 2 -3/2 (9) u x = E x/E = E x/mc = GMm/mc ∫x[x +R ] * dx Integrating and recognizing that the ratio of energy is approximately proportional to the ratio of wavelength: 2 2 2 -1/2 (10) u x = λx/λ = [GM/c ] [x +R ] Evaluating between the star and tangent to the Sun: 2 (11) u s-e = -[GM/Rc ] The wavelegnth gradient is : 2 2 (12) ∆ ux/∆R = GM/R c But from the mid point it is only half as much: 2 2 (13) ∆ ux/∆R = GM/2R c Notice that this differential is extremely small, but even such a small difference in the compression still causes considerable bending toward the increased front velocity, for example the compressed wave fronts. This phenomenon can be observed in other situations. For example, even small non-uniform shrinkage in a wood plank bends it greatly. For small deflections, the bending can be approximated by a right triangle, where the hypotenuse represents the mid-point photon path, the long side the compressed bottom path, and the small side the deflection. Applying Pythagoras’ theorem, the deflection is: (14) β = − GM/c 2 [1 2 – (1 - 1/2R 2)2]1/2 = [1- 1- 2/R 2]1/2 Droping the R 4 term & doubling to account for the star to the sun: (15) β = 2GM/Rc 2 Finally, since each deflection is small, the total angular deflection can be approximated by the sum of the deflection due to its particle and wave behaviors: See preceding diagram – Lower illustration) (16) δ = α + β = 4GM/Rc 2 If the bending contributions are compared, it is apparent that while both cause the same total bending, the profile for each is different. Particle bending is greatest while the ray is just grazing the sun. On the other hand, the wave contribution is less there, but larger off to each side. This is different from general relativity where both bending components are maximized near the center of mass. Ironically, Einstein’s ubiquitous elevator would exhibit particle bending, with an insignificant wave contribution, resulting in about half as much as general relativity predicts, but the same amount as accelerating in outer space would cause. This is because general relativity’s predicted space distortion is also greatest at the point of tangency to the sun, where gravity is strongest, and would be expected to maximize in the elevator. Nevertheless, for the entire trip from the star to earth, both deflection contributions complement each other, together deflecting more uniformly than each one separately. Consequently, acceleration and gravity do not cause the same amount of deflection, because for acceleration, the wave component is missing. In the elevator, the bending would be the same for both, but for the wrong reason. Interestingly, when Einstein, in 1911, originally proposed the equivalence principle, he predicted that light would bend, and proposed that it could be verified during the next eclipse of the sun. The calculation he presented used the wave property, not Newtonian reasoning, apparently assuming that both the wave and particle arguments were not separate and distinct, but just different views of the same phenomena. Consequently, he predicted half the deflection that was ultimately measured. Fortunately, for him, he corrected his prediction when he proposed general relativity in 1916, before the famous eclipse of the sun experiment was finally performed.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • College of San Mateo Observatory Stellar Spectra Catalog ______
    College of San Mateo Observatory Stellar Spectra Catalog SGS Spectrograph Spectra taken from CSM observatory using SBIG Self Guiding Spectrograph (SGS) ___________________________________________________ A work in progress compiled by faculty, staff, and students. Stellar Spectroscopy Stars are divided into different spectral types, which result from varying atomic-level activity on the star, due to its surface temperature. In spectroscopy, we measure this activity via a spectrograph/CCD combination, attached to a moderately sized telescope. The resultant data are converted to graphical format for further analysis. The main spectral types are characterized by the letters O,B,A,F,G,K, & M. Stars of O type are the hottest, as well as the rarest. Stars of M type are the coolest, and by far, the most abundant. Each spectral type is also divided into ten subtypes, ranging from 0 to 9, further delineating temperature differences. Type Temperature Color O 30,000 - 60,000 K Blue B 10,000 - 30,000 K Blue-white A 7,500 - 10,000 K White F 6,000 - 7,500 K Yellow-white G 5,000 - 6,000 K Yellow K 3,500 - 5,000 K Yellow-orange M >3,500 K Red Class Spectral Lines O -Weak neutral and ionized Helium, weak Hydrogen, a relatively smooth continuum with very few absorption lines B -Weak neutral Helium, stronger Hydrogen, an otherwise relatively smooth continuum A -No Helium, very strong Hydrogen, weak CaII, the continuum is less smooth because of weak ionized metal lines F -Strong Hydrogen, strong CaII, weak NaI, G-band, the continuum is rougher because of many ionized metal lines G -Weaker Hydrogen, strong CaII, stronger NaI, many ionized and neutral metals, G-band is present K -Very weak Hydrogen, strong CaII, strong NaI and many metals G- band is present M -Strong TiO molecular bands, strongest NaI, weak CaII very weak Hydrogen absorption.
    [Show full text]
  • Binary Star Modeling: a Computational Approach
    TCNJ JOURNAL OF STUDENT SCHOLARSHIP VOLUME XIV APRIL 2012 BINARY STAR MODELING: A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH Author: Daniel Silano Faculty Sponsor: R. J. Pfeiffer, Department of Physics ABSTRACT This paper illustrates the equations and computational logic involved in writing BinaryFactory, a program I developed in Spring 2011 in collaboration with Dr. R. J. Pfeiffer, professor of physics at The College of New Jersey. This paper outlines computational methods required to design a computer model which can show an animation and generate an accurate light curve of an eclipsing binary star system. The final result is a light curve fit to any star system using BinaryFactory. An example is given for the eclipsing binary star system TU Muscae. Good agreement with observational data was obtained using parameters obtained from literature published by others. INTRODUCTION This project started as a proposal for a simple animation of two stars orbiting one another in C++. I found that although there was software that generated simple animations of binary star orbits and generated light curves, the commercial software was prohibitively expensive or not very user friendly. As I progressed from solving the orbits to generating the Roche surface to generating a light curve, I learned much about computational physics. There were many trials along the way; this paper aims to explain to the reader how a computational model of binary stars is made, as well as how to avoid pitfalls I encountered while writing BinaryFactory. Binary Factory was written in C++ using the free C++ libraries, OpenGL, GLUT, and GLUI. A basis for writing a model similar to BinaryFactory in any language will be presented, with a light curve fit for the eclipsing binary star system TU Muscae in the final secion.
    [Show full text]
  • De-Coding Starlight (Grades 5-8)
    Teacher's Guide to Chandra X-ray Observatory From Pixels to Images: De-Coding Starlight (Grades 5-8) Background and Purpose In an effort to learn more about black holes, pulsars, supernovas, and other high-energy astronomical events, NASA launched the Chandra X-ray Observatory in 1999. Chandra is the largest space telescope ever launched and detects "invisible" X-ray radiation, which is often the only way that scientists can pinpoint and understand high-energy events in our universe. Computer aided data collection and processing is an essential facet to astronomical research using space- and ground-based telescopes. Every 8 hours, Chandra downloads millions of pieces of information to Earth. To control, process, and analyze this flood of numbers, scientists rely on computers, not only to do calculations, but also to change numbers into pictures. The final results of these analyses are wonderful and exciting images that expand understanding of the universe for not only scientists, but also decision-makers and the general public. Although computers are used extensively, scientists and programmers go through painstaking calibration and validation processes to ensure that computers produce technically correct images. As Dr. Neil Comins so eloquently states1, “These images create an impression of the glamour of science in the public mind that is not entirely realistic. The process of transforming [i.e., by using computers] most telescope data into accurate and meaningful images is long, involved, unglamorous, and exacting. Make a mistake in one of dozens of parameters or steps in the analysis and you will get inaccurate results.” The process of making the computer-generated images from X-ray data collected by Chandra involves the use of "false color." X-rays cannot be seen by human eyes, and therefore, have no "color." Visual representation of X-ray data, as well as radio, infrared, ultraviolet, and gamma, involves the use of "false color" techniques, where colors in the image represent intensity, energy, temperature, or another property of the radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Eclipsing Binary Star in Constellation of Taurus “WY Tau” Avery Mcchristian Advisor: Dr Shaukat Goderya
    Astronomy at Tarleton State University: A study of Eclipsing Binary Star (WY TAU) in the constellation of Taurus the Bull Avery McChristian Advisor: Dr Shaukat Goderya Types of Eclipsing Binary What is a Binary Star Stars Observation and Analysis A binary star is a stellar system consisting of two stars which The data on “WY TAU” was gathered in November and orbit around a common point, called the center of mass. The December of 2006 using Tarleton State’s observatory. two stars are gravitationally bound to each other. It has been Contact 1,008 images were collected over nine nights. The estimated that more than half of all stars in our galaxy are images were taken under two different filters; 507 were binary stars. Binary stars play a vital role in our taken using a Visual band pass filter and 501 were understanding of the evolution and physics of stars. When taken using a Blue band pass filter. Using “Astronomical studied they can provide important data on the mass of each Image Processing for Windows” software we were able individual star. It is possible to obtain this information only if Semi Detached to extract the Julian date and magnitude from the raw both spectroscopic and photometric study of the system is images. We then used excel to convert time, or Julian performed. Spectroscopic study enables the determination of date, into phase and magnitude into intensity. Using the absolute parameters of the binary system. phase and intensity figures we were able to construct the observed light curve. Upon inspection of the light curve we realized the period and epoch needed Detached corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • RECOLORING the UNIVERSE
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration 2 De-Coding Starlight Activity: From Pixels to Images RECOLORING the UNIVERSE The Scenario You have discovered a new supernova remnant using NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory. The Director of NASA Deep Space Research has requested a report of your results. Unfortunately, your computer crashed fatally while you were creating an image of the supernova remnant from the numerical data. To fix this, you will create, by hand, an image of the supernova remnant. To create the image, you will use “raw” data from the Chandra satellite. You have tables of the data, but unfortunately don’t have all of it on paper so you will have to recalculate some values. In addition to the graph, you will prepare a written explanation of your discovery and answer a few questions. www.nasa.gov chandra.si.edu COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS: Calculations Your mission is to turn numbers into a picture. Before you can make the image, you will need to make some calculations. 1 The raw data for the destroyed “pixels” (grid squares containing a value and color) are listed in Table 1. Before making the image, you will need to fill in the last column of Table 1 by calculating average X-ray intensity for each pixel. After you have determined average pixel values for the destroyed pixels, write the numerical values in the proper box (pixel) of the attached grid. Many of the pixel values are already on the grid, but you have to fill in the blank pixels. This is the grid in which you will draw the image Coloring the Image Complete the following steps in coloring the image.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsleiter I
    + THE NEWSLEITER I VOLUME IV NO. 1 1981 THE OLIVER CHALLENGE T he Monterey I nstitute for Research in Ast ronomy will soon become an important center for stellar astronorny due in large part to the determination of its staff and the generous st^pport of many individuals and companies. Thanks to donations of equipment, f oundation grants, and personal contributions, M IRA now possesses a telescope and instrumentat ion. With a use permit for Chews Ridge in the Los Padres National Forest, MIRA has access to one of the finest sites for optical astronorny in North America. But, one component of MIRA's observatory is still missing: the observatory building. ln December 1980, Dr. Bbrnard M. Oliver, recently retired Vice-President for Research and Development at Hewlett- Packard, pledged a personal challenge grant of $200,000 for the construction of M IRA's observatory building. For every dollar contributed to the building fund between now and the end of the year, Dr. oliver will donate a matching dollar. The matching of ttre Oliver Challenge by MIRA's Friends will be a maior step toward the construction of the observatory building on Chews Ridge. A native Californian educated at Stanford and the California lnstitute of Technology, Dr. oliver's interest in M IRA dates back several years. tast June, he visited Monterey to give a lecture m the 'Search for Extraterrestrial I ntelligence' to the Friends of MIRA. At that time, he visited the MIRA shop to assess the staf f 's work on the Ret icon Spect rophotqmeter and related instrumentation.
    [Show full text]
  • PREFACE Symposium 177 of the International Astronomical Union
    PREFACE Symposium 177 of the International Astronomical Union was held in late May of 1996 in the coastal city of Antalya, Turkey. It was attended by 142 scientists from 32 countries. The purpose of the symposium was to discuss the causes and effects of the composition changes that often occur in the atmospheres of cool, evolved stars such as the carbon stars in the course of their evolution. This volume includes the full texts of papers presented orally and one-page abstracts of the poster contributions. The chemical composition of a star's observable surface layers depends not only upon the composition of the interstellar medium from which it formed, but in many cases also upon the star's own history. Consequently, spectroscopic studies of starlight can tell us much about a star's origin, the path it followed as it evolved, and the physical processes of the interior which brought about the composition changes and made them visible on the surface. Furthermore, evolved stars are often surrounded by detectable shells of their own making, and the compositions of these shells provide additional clues concerning the star's evolutionary history. It was Henry Norris Russell who showed in 1934 that the gross spectro- scopic differences between the molecular spectra of carbon stars and M stars could be explained as due to a simple reversal of the abundances of oxygen and carbon. It was also realized early on that the interstellar medium is nowhere carbon-rich, and that changes in chemical composition must be the result of nuclear reactions that take place in the hot interiors of stars, not in their atmospheres.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to JRASC Volumes 61-90 (PDF)
    THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA GENERAL INDEX to the JOURNAL 1967–1996 Volumes 61 to 90 inclusive (including the NATIONAL NEWSLETTER, NATIONAL NEWSLETTER/BULLETIN, and BULLETIN) Compiled by Beverly Miskolczi and David Turner* * Editor of the Journal 1994–2000 Layout and Production by David Lane Published by and Copyright 2002 by The Royal Astronomical Society of Canada 136 Dupont Street Toronto, Ontario, M5R 1V2 Canada www.rasc.ca — [email protected] Table of Contents Preface ....................................................................................2 Volume Number Reference ...................................................3 Subject Index Reference ........................................................4 Subject Index ..........................................................................7 Author Index ..................................................................... 121 Abstracts of Papers Presented at Annual Meetings of the National Committee for Canada of the I.A.U. (1967–1970) and Canadian Astronomical Society (1971–1996) .......................................................................168 Abstracts of Papers Presented at the Annual General Assembly of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada (1969–1996) ...........................................................207 JRASC Index (1967-1996) Page 1 PREFACE The last cumulative Index to the Journal, published in 1971, was compiled by Ruth J. Northcott and assembled for publication by Helen Sawyer Hogg. It included all articles published in the Journal during the interval 1932–1966, Volumes 26–60. In the intervening years the Journal has undergone a variety of changes. In 1970 the National Newsletter was published along with the Journal, being bound with the regular pages of the Journal. In 1978 the National Newsletter was physically separated but still included with the Journal, and in 1989 it became simply the Newsletter/Bulletin and in 1991 the Bulletin. That continued until the eventual merger of the two publications into the new Journal in 1997.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Magnetic Fields and Diffuse Radio Emission in Abell 3667 and Other Rich Southern Clusters of Galaxies
    LI b. s'o Detection of Magnetic Fields and Diffuse Radio Emission in Abell 3667 and other Rich Southern Clusters of Galaxies Melanie J ohnst on-Hollitt Department of Physics & Mathematical Physics tlniversity of Adelaide A thesis subm'itted'in fulfi'Iment of the requ'irements for the degree of Doctor of Ph'ilosophA July 2003 @) 2003 Melanie Johnston-Hollitt Statement of OriginalitY This thesis is the result of work undertaken between 1998 and 2002in the Astrophysics Group in the Department of Physics and Mathematical Physics at the University of Adelaide and the csIRo Australia Telescope National Facility. 843 MHz data from the Molonglo Observatory Synthesis Telescope and R-band CCD imaging of 43667 were kindly provicled by Dr Dick Hunstead and the Astrophysics Department at the University of Sydney' 20 and 13cm ATCA data for the northwest region of 43667 taken by Röttgering et al. (1gg7) were obtained from the ATNF archive and re-analysed in conjunction with new data presented here for the southern region' The MTRTAD software package was used for the data reduction and analysis of ATCA data, while programs from the KARMA suite were used for visualisation. The AJPS software package was used for the reduction and analysis of VLA data. The 2clfdr software suite was used for the initial reduction of the 43667 spectroscopic data, and I am grateful to the 2dF Galaxy redshift team for allowing the use of their spectral templates. Radio spectral analysis of the diffuse radio emission in 43667 was performed using the SyNAGE+1 package in collaboration with Matteo Murgia of the IRA, Bologna, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Energy and Very High-Energy Gamma-Ray Emission from the Magnetar SGR 1900+14 Neighbourhood B
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. SGR1900_14 c ESO 2020 September 15, 2020 High-energy and very high-energy gamma-ray emission from the magnetar SGR 1900+14 neighbourhood B. Hnatyk, R. Hnatyk, V. Zhdanov, and V.Voitsekhovskyi Astronomical Observatory of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 3 Observatorna str. Kyiv, 04053, Ukraine e-mail: [email protected] Received date / Accepted date ABSTRACT Context. Magnetar wind nebulae (MWNe), created by new-born millisecond magnetars, and magnetar giant flares are PeVatron candidates and even potential sources of ultra high energy (E > 1018 eV) cosmic rays (UHECRs). Nonthermal high-energy (HE, E > 100 MeV) and very high-energy (VHE, E > 100 GeV) γ-ray emission from magnetars’ neighbourhoods should be a promising signature of acceleration processes. Aims. We investigate a possibility of explaining HE and VHE γ-ray emission from the vicinity of the magnetar SGR 1900+14 by cosmic rays accelerated in a Supernova remnant of a magnetar-related Supernova and/or in a MWN. Methods. Simulation of the observed HE (the extended Fermi-LAT source 4FGL J1908.6+0915e) and VHE (the extended H.E.S.S. source candidate HOTS J1907+091 and the point-like HAWC TeV source 3HWC J1907+085) γ-ray emission, spatially coincident with the magnetar SGR 1900+14, was carried out in the framework of hadronic (pp collisions with a subsequent pion decay) and leptonic (inverse Compton scattering of low energy background photons by ultrarelativistic electrons) models. Results. We show that under reasonable assumptions about parameters of the circumstellar medium the observed γ-ray emission of Fermi-LAT 4FGL J1908.6+0915e, H.E.S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Written in the Stars
    THE NOBEL PRIZE IN PHYSICS 2011 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC Written in the stars “Some say the world will end in fre; , 1920 Some say in ice…”* What is the fate of the Universe? Probably it will end in ice if we are to believe this year’s Nobel Laureates. Fire and Ice Fire They have carefully studied several dozen exploding stars, called supernovae, in faraway galaxies and have concluded that the expansion of the Universe is speeding up. *Robert Frost, *Robert Frost, The discovery came as a complete surprise even to the Nobel Laureates themselves. What they saw would be like throwing a ball up in the air, and instead of having it come back down, watching as it disappears more and more rapidly into the sky, as if gravity could not manage to reverse the ball’s trajectory. Something simi- lar seemed to be happening across the entire Universe. dark energy gravitation galaxy supernova acceleration acceleration big bang decreases increases universe percent 100 80 matter 60 40 dark matter 20 dark energy 0 14 billion 5 billion present years ago years ago Figure 1. The world is growing. The expansion of the Universe began with the Big Bang 14 billion years ago, but slowed down during the frst several billion years. Eventually it started to accelerate. The acceleration is believed to be driven by dark energy, which in the begin- ning constituted only a small part of the Universe. But as matter got diluted by the expansion, the dark energy became more dominant. The growing rate of the expansion implies that the Universe is being pushed apart by an unknown form of energy embedded in the fabric of space.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Stars Stars Analyzing Starlight Star
    30.1 Characteristics of Stars Stars Characteristics of Stars · star = ball of gas that emits light Section 30.1 · fueled by nuclear fusion · vary in color Analyzing Starlight Star Characteristics · spectrographs - device that separates light into · composition different wavelengths (colors) most common element - hydrogen · each star produces a unique spectrum (series of second most common - helium colors and lines) · temperature · a star's spectrum tells us blue = hottest elements present (composition) yellow (ex. sun) surface temperature red = coolest how fast the star is moving · size and mass toward or away from Earth dwarf, medium, and giant Solar spectrum 1 How do scientists determine the 2 What color are the warmest stars? composition and temperature of stars? A yellow A by taking samples from the star's surface B blue B by analyzing the vibrations that the star emits C white C through magnetic testing D red by analyzing the spectra of the light that a D star emits 30.1 Characteristics of Stars Stellar Motion · apparent motion visible to the unaided eye caused by Earth's rotation appear to move counter-clockwise around Polaris (the North Star) different stars appear in different seasons Red Shift = star moving away circumpolar stars - always visible in the night sky · actual rotate on an axis revolve around another star move away from or toward our solar system · Doppler effect shifting wavelengths of light emitted by a light source moving toward or away from an observer Blue shift = star moving toward blue shift = moving toward
    [Show full text]