DOCSLIB.ORG

Appointing Masters Other Judicial Adjuncts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appointing Masters Other Judicial Adjuncts APPOINTING MASTERS AND OTHER JUDICIAL ADJUNCTS A Benchbook for Judges and Lawyers 2020 Edition APPOINTING MASTERS AND OTHER JUDICIAL ADJUNCTS A Benchbook for Judges and Lawyers Table of Contents Acknowledgements Introduction Section 1: Types of Appointments 1.1 Settlement Master 1.2 Discovery Master 1.3 Privilege Review Master 1.4 Electronic Discovery Master 1.5 Coordinating Master 1.6 Trial Master 1.7 Expert Advisor 1.8 Technology Master 1.9 Monitor 1.10 Class Action Master 1.11 Claims Administrator 1.12 Auditor/Accountant 1.13 Receiver 1.14 Criminal Case Master 1.15 Conference Judicial Adjunct 1.16 Ethics Master 1.17 Supreme Court Master 1.18 Appellate Master 1.19 Specialized Masters Section 2. Appointment Orders 2.1 Order of Appointment 2.2 Checklist of Provisions 2.3 Contents of Order 2.4 Sample Form Master Model 2.5 Affidavit of Masters Section 3. Ethical Issues and Practical Concerns 3.1 Sources of Ethical Rules for Judicial Adjuncts 3.2 Basic Ethical Rules for Judicial Adjuncts Rule 1: Dignity and Integrity of the Court Rule 2: Competence and Diligence Rule 3: Propriety Rule 4: Neutrality/Absence of Conflict or Appearance of Conflict Rule 5: Disqualification Rule 6: Confidentiality Rule 7: Compensation/Time-keeping/Gifts and Favors 3.3 Checklist: Ethical Rules to Consider for Specific Circumstances Section 4. Managing the Unmanageable: Special Masters—A Special Solution An Article on the ABA Guidelines and Report for the Appointment and Use of Special Masters in Federal and State Civil Litigation Section 5. Table of State Court Provisions Governing Judicial Adjuncts Section 6. Articles, Books, Websites, and Literature About Masters Appendices Appendix 1 Sample Master Appointment Orders Appendix 2 ABA Guidelines/Report for Special Masters in Civil Litigation Appendix 3 Fed. R. Civ. P. 53 Appendix 4 28 U.S.C. § 455 Disqualification of Judge Appendix 5 Model Rule of Professional Conduct Rule 1.12 Appendix 6 Code of Conduct for United States Judges Appendix 7 Code of Conduct for Judicial Employees Appendix 8 The Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes Appendix 9 Forum Code of Conduct for Arbitrators Appendix 10 JAMS Arbitrators Ethics Guidelines © 2006-2020 by the Academy of Court-Appointed Masters. ISBN 0-9786438-0-1 Permission to reprint is granted to all attorneys, judges, and court personnel for professional use and to all accredited education institutions for education purposes. All other persons and entities may reprint only with written permission. Contact [email protected] or [email protected] (952.906.9700) Acknowledgements Many professionals contributed to the development of this book. We first acknowledge the federal and state court judges and magistrates who pioneered the use of masters and who presently appoint them to serve in many cases. The following judges and magistrates have been leaders in the use of masters: Michael J. Davis, Paul L. Friedman, Ronald Hedges, Lamar Pickard, Sam C. Pointer, Jr., Manuel Real, Lee Rosenthal, Barbara Jacobs Rothstein, Shira Scheindlin, and Jack B. Weinstein. Other important contributors include Sol Schreiber, Frances McGovern, and Kenneth R. Feinberg, who have each served as special masters in many groundbreaking cases and who have given generously of their time to teach and write about special master work. This book was originally written by several members of the publications committee of the Academy of Court-Appointed Masters (ACAM). The authors and editors included: Roger Haydock, David Cohen, Martin Quinn, and Randi Ilyse Roth. Cynthia Gilbertson and Ann Pagel Newman provided editing assistance. Other members of the initial ACAM publications committee included: David Ferleger, Mike Frascogna, Rick Grauer, Greg Miller, Gale “Pete” Peterson, and Clarence Sundram. Subsequent editions were revised and edited by members of the Publication Committee including Roger Haydock, Cary Ichter, David Tenner, David Cohen, and Howard Marsee. Additional ACAM masters contributed to the development of this book including A.J. Nichols and members of the Board of Directors: Martin Quinn, Lewis Remele, Richard Levie, David Herr, Margaret Farrell, Francis McGovern, Patrick Juneau, John Upchurch, and Sherry Wetsch. Staff and students of the Mitchell Hamline College of Law and the Mitchell Hamline Journal of Law and Practice also contributed to this edition, including Neal Axton, Mary Ann Archer, Cal Bonde, Andrew Haugen, Nathan Swanson, Ann Gennell, and Jessica Martin. The first National Conference for Special Masters was held in October 2004 at the William Mitchell College of Law, with assistance from the Federal Judicial Center and the Forum. That conference led to the creation of ACAM and subsequently to the development of this book. 1 Academy of Court---Appointed Masters Introduction This book provides invaluable information to judges and lawyers regarding the best use of masters. Our civil justice system needs the services that judicial adjuncts can provide courts, parties, and the public. This benchbook explains how masters can be used to fulfill our mission to provide a just, speedy, and inexpensive determination for all disputes. This reference book is designed to help federal and state court judges and lawyers: (1) decide whether and when to appoint a master; (2) draft effective appointment orders; and (3) anticipate and effectively address ethical issues and practical concerns that arise in master work. These materials may also be helpful to prospective judicial adjuncts and to parties considering whether to request the appointment of an adjunct. Sections of this book comprise an invaluable resource regarding master practice. These sections include a summary of Federal Rule 53 and the rules or statutes authorizing masters and judicial adjuncts in every state. Another section includes a description of legal articles and literature on masters. These unique resources are timely updated and provide a comprehensive research source. All courts have the power to appoint a master or other type of judicial adjunct to assist with civil and criminal cases. Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the appointment of masters in federal court. In state courts, various procedural rules or state statutes empower judges to obtain assistance. State court judicial officers may be designated as special masters, masters, referees, commissioners, magistrates, or another name for a judicial adjunct. Many federal and state court judges use masters, and more will do so in the future. Because of their substantial caseloads, many judges and magistrate judges do not have sufficient time for the tasks inherent in the administration of complex, multi-party, and class action cases. Judges need to conserve and preserve their time to rule on pretrial matters and to try cases. And, with demanding dockets and diminishing court budgets, judges are looking for places to turn for help. Judicial adjuncts can provide courts, parties, and lawyers with essential services without tapping into court resources. Masters can act as mediators and settle civil and criminal cases away from the courthouse; they can monitor discovery and resolve time-consuming disputes; they can help with the growing burden on courts caused by electronically stored information (ESI) discovery problems; they can be assigned trial duties; they can testify as expert witnesses, especially in cases involving technical and specialized issues; they can help coordinate multi-party, multi- jurisdictional, and multi-district litigation (MDL) cases; they can administer settlement claims; and they can monitor compliance with a court order or settlement agreement; they can serve in criminal cases. 2 An adjunct can markedly reduce the burden on a judge, the judge’s staff, and the court’s administrative staff. Parties and lawyers recognize that the appointment of a master can save them substantial fees and costs, and can lead to a much quicker resolution of their disputes. Judges who use professional and experienced masters know how valuable they can be to case handling and resolution. Section 1 of this book summarizes the various roles judicial adjuncts can serve. Section 2 covers appointment orders. It explains the rules that govern appointment orders and provides a detailed checklist of items to include in an appointment order and includes a checklist. Section 3 covers ethical issues and practical concerns. It explains the sources of authority for ethics rules that govern judicial adjuncts, gives an overview of the rules, and provides a checklist for judges to review with their adjuncts early in the appointment. The checklists provided in Sections 2 and 3 focuses on key issues in the appointment process. Although the checklists are tailored to federal rules, they are also relevant in state courts because of the substantial similarity between state and federal rules, and because the same practical issues will arise in all jurisdictions. Section 4 includes an article about the newly established ABA Guidelines for the Appointment and Use of Special Masters in Federal and State Litigation. The Guidelines and the Report appear in Appendix 2. Section 5 details provisions of Federal Rule 53 and the respective rules and statutes empowering masters and judicial adjuncts for every state. These provisions permit comparative reviews among various procedural and substantive master regulations. Section 6 contains citations and concise descriptions of articles, books, websites, and literature about the use of masters. Finally, several appendices provide sample appointment orders, Federal Rule 53 with Comments, and codes of professional conduct The goal of the Academy of Court-Appointed Masters (ACAM) is to assist the courts in providing all parties with a fair, affordable, and speedy resolution of litigation. ACAM members are available to serve as masters and as other types of judicial adjuncts. ACAM’s website provides information about the Academy and links to contact information and credentials for our members: http://www.courtappointedmasters.org. ACAM is very pleased to provide judges and lawyers with this book. We hope that you find it to be a practical, easy-to-use reference.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Masters in the Supreme Court's Original Jurisdiction Cases Anne-Marie C
    University of Minnesota Law School Scholarship Repository Minnesota Law Review 2002 Lurking in the Shadows of Judicial Process: Special Masters in the Supreme Court's Original Jurisdiction Cases Anne-Marie C. Carstens Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Carstens, Anne-Marie C., "Lurking in the Shadows of Judicial Process: Special Masters in the Supreme Court's Original Jurisdiction Cases" (2002). Minnesota Law Review. 846. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mlr/846 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Minnesota Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Minnesota Law Review collection by an authorized administrator of the Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lurking in the Shadows of Judicial Process: Special Masters in the Supreme Court's Original Jurisdiction Cases t Anne-Marie C. Carstens INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 626 I. THE COURT'S ORIGINAL JURISDICTION, IN PERSPECTIVE ............................................. 631 A. The OriginalJurisdiction Clause .................. 631 B. Cases Arising under the Original JurisdictionClause ...................................... 638 II. CALLED TO WORK: THE SPECIAL MASTERS' ROLE IN ORIGINAL JURISDICTION LITIGATION .......... 641 A. The Emergence of the Special Master ............. 641 B. The Identity of the Special Master .................. 644 C. The Master Proceedings .............................. 653 III. THE MASTER AT WORK: NEW JERSEY V. NEW YORK ..................................................... 658 A. The History of the Ellis Island Dispute ............ 658 B. The Special Master's Role in New Jersey v. New York ............................ 662 C. The Court's Decision in New Jersey v. New York ................................................... 666 IV. THE MASTER PREDICAMENT ................................ 668 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Littleworth Webbook.Book
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Arthur L. Littleworth WATER LAW ATTORNEY AND RIVERSIDE CIVIC LEADER With an introduction by Robert B. Maddow An Interview Conducted by Germaine LaBerge and Ruth Langridge in 2002-2004 Copyright © 2005 by The Regents of the University of California Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral history is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ************************************ All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Arthur L. Littleworth, dated March 10, 2004. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculating Fees of Special Masters David I
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 1985 Calculating Fees of Special Masters David I. Levine UC Hastings College of the Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Civil Law Commons Recommended Citation David I. Levine, Calculating Fees of Special Masters, 37 Hastings L.J. 141 (1985). Available at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship/405 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Faculty Publications UC Hastings College of the Law Library Levine David Author: David I. Levine Source: Hastings Law Journal Citation: 37 Hastings L.J. 141 (1985). Title: Calculating Fees of Special Masters Originally published in HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL. This article is reprinted with permission from HASTINGS LAW JOURNAL and University of California, Hastings College of the Law. Calculating Fees of Special Masters By DAVID I. LEVINE* Appointments of special masters1 have received a significant amount of attention in the academic literature. Judges have experimented with the use of special masters in the management of all phases of complex cases, including pretrial and discovery,2 settlement, 3 and particularly the creation and implementation of a court's remedial plan4 in institutional * Associate Professor of Law, University of California, Hastings College of the Law. A.B. 1974, University of Michigan; J.D. 1978, University of Pennsylvania. I am grateful for the diligent research assistance of Mary Catherine M.
    [Show full text]
  • DAVID R. COHEN Cleveland, Ohio 44122 Attorney at Law Telephone: 216.831.0001 Facsimile: 866.357.3535 [email protected]
    24400 Chagrin Boulevard Reflections Bldg., Suite 300 DAVID R. COHEN Cleveland, Ohio 44122 Attorney at Law Telephone: 216.831.0001 Facsimile: 866.357.3535 [email protected] Dear Colleague: Please find attached a copy of the most recent edition of APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTERS AND OTHER JUDICIAL ADJUNCTS: A BENCHBOOK FOR JUDGES AND LAWYERS, published by the Academy of Court-Appointed Masters. This PDF file is designed for double-sided printing and three-hole punching, if you care to make hard copies for easy reference. As a charter member and President Emeritus of ACAM and also Co-Chair of the Publications Committee, I helped to write and edit this BENCHBOOK. I hope you find it useful. Please feel free to forward this copy to others. If you have any questions or suggestions regarding the BENCHBOOK, please let me know. Sincerely, David R. Cohen [email protected] 2 APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTERS AND OTHER JUDICIAL ADJUNCTS A Benchbook for Judges and Lawyers JANUARY 2013 Edition APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTERS AND OTHER JUDICIAL ADJUNCTS A Benchbook for Judges and Lawyers Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 2 Section 1. Types of Appointments......................................................................................... 4 1.1 Settlement Master ...........................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]