DOCSLIB.ORG

Visual Impact Assessment Proposed Eskom Ocgt Power Plant Additional Units, Mossel Bay

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Visual Impact Assessment Proposed Eskom Ocgt Power Plant Additional Units, Mossel Bay VISUALIMPACTASSESSMENT OCGTPOWERPLANT ADDITIONALUNITS MosselBayMunicipality February2007 Documentpreparedonbehalfof NinhamShand 65YorkStreet George VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED ESKOM OCGT POWER PLANT ADDITIONAL UNITS, MOSSEL BAY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................3 2 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................6 3 TERMS OF REFERENCE ...................................................................................................6 3.1 DEA&DP GUIDELINE INVOLVING VISUAL AND AESTHETIC SPECIALISTS IN EIA PROCESS ......7 4 METHODOLOGY.................................................................................................................8 4.1 PUBLIC COMMENT......................................................................................................8 4.1.1 Raising of Key Issues (public input).......................................................................8 4.2 VISUAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (VRM)...............................................................8 4.2.1 Visual Inventory .....................................................................................................9 4.2.2 Contrast Rating......................................................................................................9 4.2.3 VRM Class Objectives .........................................................................................10 4.2.4 Impact assessment..............................................................................................11 4.2.5 Potential Management Actions ............................................................................11 4.3 PLANNING POLICY RESEARCH...............................................................................12 4.3.1 Factors from Mossel Bay Spatial Development Framework ................................12 4.3.2 Factors from Western Cape Provincial Spatial Development Framework ...........13 5 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE MOSSEL BAY AREA ..............................................14 5.1 LOCALITY ..................................................................................................................14 5.1.1 Sense of History ..................................................................................................15 5.1.2 Sense of Nature...................................................................................................16 5.1.3 Sense of Limits ....................................................................................................16 5.1.4 Sense of Place.....................................................................................................16 6 RESULTS ..........................................................................................................................18 6.1 VISUAL INVENTORY .................................................................................................18 6.1.1 Viewshed Analysis...............................................................................................18 6.1.2 Photographs from Site .........................................................................................19 6.1.3 Observation Points ..............................................................................................20 6.1.4 Property Character ..............................................................................................23 6.2 PHYSIOGRAPHIC RATING UNITS ............................................................................24 6.2.1 Assessment of Classes Table..............................................................................25 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTION.................................................................................................26 7.1 PROPOSED PROJECT ..............................................................................................26 7.2 ALTERNATIVES .........................................................................................................29 7.2.1 Alternative 1: Proposed three additional OCGT units ..........................................29 7.2.2 Alternative 2: No Go Option.................................................................................30 7.3 PHOTO MONTAGE ....................................................................................................30 7.4 CONTRAST RATING..................................................................................................33 7.4.1 Contrast Rating Summary Table..........................................................................33 7.4.2 Contrast Rating Discussion..................................................................................34 7.4.3 Impact Assessment .............................................................................................34 7.5 RECOMMENDATIONS AND MITIGATIONS ..............................................................36 7.5.1 The OCGT Plant and Associated Infrastructure...................................................36 7.5.2 Controlling Future Development ..........................................................................38 8 APPENDICES....................................................................................................................39 8.1 APPENDIX A...............................................................................................................39 8.2 APPENDIX B...............................................................................................................42 8.2.2 Contrast Rating Tables ........................................................................................46 VRM AFRICA Page 1 of 48 February 2007 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED ESKOM OCGT POWER PLANT ADDITIONAL UNITS, MOSSEL BAY TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1. Topographical Landuse Map.....................................................................................14 Figure 2. Site Location Map .....................................................................................................15 Figure 3. Viewshed Map on 50 000 Topographic Map.............................................................18 Figure 4. Observation Points....................................................................................................20 Figure 5. Additional Units Layout Map......................................................................................26 Figure 6. 3D Model of existing Atlantis site development.........................................................28 Figure 7. Proposed Unit size and Generic Plan .......................................................................29 VRM AFRICA Page 2 of 48 February 2007 VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSED ESKOM OCGT POWER PLANT ADDITIONAL UNITS, MOSSEL BAY 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY VRM AFRICA CC VRM Africa CC is a Visual Impact Study and Mapping organisation located in George, Western Cape. We make use of the well-documented visual impact analysis methodology developed by the Bureau of Land Management in the USA in order to accurately and objectively quantify visual impact. For this purpose we make extensive use of GIS and 3D modelling technology. Over the last 3 years VRM Africa CC has been involved with over 40 Visual Impact Assessments (VIA) throughout the country. The majority have been based in the Western Cape ensuring we have extensive practical experience assessing projects in terms of the planning policies stipulated by the DEA&DP Guidelines and the Western Cape PSDF. For this project input regarding the mitigations and recommendations was gained from Liesel Stokes of Brink, Stokes, Mhkize (BSM), registered Landscape Architects. Terms of Reference VRM Africa was tasked by Ninham Shand with assessing the significance of the Visual Impact of the proposed development of three additional units at the Mossel Bay OCGT power plant, Portion 1 of Farm Patrysfontein, Number 228, using the criteria stipulated in the terms of reference. (See full terms of reference on page 6). In order to comply with Visual Resource Management requirements it is necessary to take into account all the relevant planning documentation and guidelines pertaining to this area. The Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning’s (DEA&DP) “Guideline for involving Visual and Aesthetic Specialists in EIA processes” identifies visual triggers which are used to define the scope and extent of a Visual Impact Assessment. An initial visit to the property was undertaken and the following potential ‘triggers’ were identified which would require further investigation. o Areas of proclaimed heritage sites of scenic routes o Areas with intact wilderness qualities, or pristine ecosystems, o Areas with a recognised special character or sense of place, o Areas of important tourism or recreation value, o Areas with important vistas or scenic corridors, o Areas with visually prominent ridgelines or skylines, o A significant change to the fabric and character of the area, o Possible visual intrusion in the landscape1 Methodology The VRM methodology is a systematic process developed by the United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to measure contrast in order to analyse the potential visual impact of proposed projects and activities. The basic philosophy underlying the system is: The degree to which a management activity affects the visual quality of a landscape depends on the visual contrast created between a project and the existing landscape. The VRM
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast
    Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast Phase 2 Report: Eden District Municipality Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Modelling Final May 2010 REPORT TITLE : Phase 2 Report: Eden District Municipality Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Modelling CLIENT : Provincial Government of the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Strategic Environmental Management PROJECT : Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast AUTHORS : D. Blake N. Chimboza REPORT STATUS : Final REPORT NUMBER : 769/2/1/2010 DATE : May 2010 APPROVED FOR : S. Imrie D. Blake Project Manager Task Leader This report is to be referred to in bibliographies as: Umvoto Africa. (2010). Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Assessment for a Select Disaster Prone Area Along the Western Cape Coast. Phase 2 Report: Eden District Municipality Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Modelling. Prepared by Umvoto Africa (Pty) Ltd for the Provincial Government of the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning: Strategic Environmental Management (May 2010). Phase 2: Eden DM Sea Level Rise and Flood Risk Modelling 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Umvoto Africa (Pty) Ltd was appointed by the Western Cape Department of Environmental Affairs and Development Planning (DEA&DP): Strategic Environmental Management division to undertake a sea level rise and flood risk assessment for a select disaster prone area along the Western Cape coast, namely the portion of coastline covered by the Eden District (DM) Municipality, from Witsand to Nature’s Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications
    APPLICATIONS PUBLICATIONS AREAS BUSINESS NAMES AUGUST 2021 02 09 16 23 30 INC Observatory, Rondebosch East, Lansdowne, Newlands, Rondebosch, Rosebank, Mowbray, Bishopscourt, Southern Suburbs Tatler Claremont, Sybrand Park, Kenilworth, Pinelands, Kenwyn, BP Rosemead / PnP Express Rosemead Grocer's Wine 26 Salt River, Woodstock, University Estate, Walmer Estate, Fernwood, Harfield, Black River Park Hazendal, Kewtown, Bridgetown, Silvertown, Rylands, Newfields, Gatesville, Primrose Park, Surrey Estate, Heideveld, Athlone News Shoprite Liquorshop Vangate 25 Pinati, Athlone, Bonteheuwel, Lansdowne, Crawford, Sherwood Park, Bokmakierie, Manenberg, Hanover Park, Vanguard Deloitte Cape Town Bantry Bay, Camps Bay, Clifton, De Waterkant, Gardens, Green Point, Mouille Point, Oranjezicht, Schotsche Kloof, Cape Town Wine & Spirits Emporium Atlantic Sun 26 Sea Point, Tamboerskloof, Three Anchor Bay, Vredehoek, V & A Marina Accommodation Devilspeak, Zonnebloem, Fresnaye, Bakoven Truman and Orange Bergvliet, Diep River, Tokai, Meadowridge, Frogmore Estate, Southfield, Flintdale Estate, Plumstead, Constantia, Wynberg, Kirstenhof, Westlake, Steenberg Golf Estate, Constantia Village, Checkers Liquorshop Westlake Constantiaberg Bulletin 26 Silverhurst, Nova Constantia, Dreyersdal, Tussendal, John Collins Wines Kreupelbosch, Walloon Estate, Retreat, Orchard Village, Golf Links Estate Blouberg, Table View, Milnerton, Edgemead, Bothasig, Tygerhof, Sanddrift, Richwood, Blouberg Strand, Milnerton Ridge, Summer Greens, Melkbosstrand, Flamingo Vlei, TableTalk Duynefontein,
    [Show full text]
  • Sitting of the Western Cape Liquor Board, Knysna
    SITTING OF THE WESTERN CAPE LIQUOR BOARD, 13 SEPTEMBER 2006, KNYSNA No. WCP Name of Premises District Current Holder Licence Type Prospective Rep. Remarks Holder 031591 RUMOURS STRAND PAUL JOHANNES REST S113 JOHANNES D M APPROVED COFFEE BAR & RUDOLPH JAKOBUS ELLIS HOOGENHOUT TAKEOUT 031597 THE POST HOUSE HERMANUS CHRISTO MARITZ REST S113 HOWARD D M APPROVED RESTAURANT CLOETE CHARLES SIMS- HOOGENHOUT HANDCOCK 032140 BUSH PUB KUILS RIVER NICO LUCAS SPEC. LIC. S113 LIEZEL ALFIE CROUS APPROVED (ON-CONS) VAN LILL 031918 TRAUMEREI PAARL CORPCLO 797 CC REST S113 ZAUBERTHAFT D M APPROVED (FRANSCHHOEK) STARLIGHT HOOGENHOUT CAFÉ CC 031112 CERES INDOOR CERES CERES INDOOR SPEC. LIC. S113 ROSANNE RAUCH VAN APPROVED SPORTS PUB DATE: 20-08-2004 SPORTS PUB CC (ON-CONS) LOUW VUUREN ATTORNEYS 030773 CAFÉ AMNESIA WYNBERG GILLIAN VAN SPEC. LIC. S113 TERENCE LAURENCE APPROVED RHEEDE VAN (ON-CONS) JOHANNES NATHAN OUDTSHOORN ALDRICK 032903 LACOMIA KUILS RIVER DECORAMIX REST S113 IMANDI ALFIE CROUS APPROVED ESPRESSO BAR & FLOOR COVERING TRADING 71 CC RESTAURANT CC 031071 ATLANTIC MALMESBURY GERALD BRIAN REST S113 CENTRAL D M APPROVED COFFEE CLUB TAYLOR ROUTE HOOGENHOUT TRADING 174 CC 033014 GUIDO’S KNYSNA RUDI POTGIETER REST S113 V & G FOODS CC D M APPROVED RESTAURANT HOOGENHOUT 028124 ST ELMO’S THE CAPE 3RD WAVE REST S113 HENQUE SALVATORE APPROVED RESTAURANT & TECHNOLOGIES 3207 CC CARMINE PIZZAWAY, CC PUGLIA GARDENS ATTORNEYS 029632 DELFT LIQUOR BELLVILLE JOAO AVELINO LIQUOR S113 PEDRO JOSE B.A. JEURSEN APPROVED STORE ALVES FERREIRA STORE PINTO REIMAO 030165
    [Show full text]
  • June 2019 Monthly Report
    June 2019 Monthly Report The June monthly report makes for a lot of interesting reading with many activities taking place that kept the Rangers on their toes. The report provides the usual monthly compliance statistics including the discovery of snares, followed by a report back on the Voortrekkers annual visit, activities surround alien plant control and fuel load reduction, maintenance and some interesting wildlife highlights from the month. This report then details an alien biomass expo the Rangers attended, the very intriguing washout of a rare beaked whale and the Conservancy’s involvement therein, a conversation piece on Haworthia conservation and the release of a lesser Flamingo. The report is then concluded with the Capped Wheatear which features as this month’s monthly species profile. Plough snails enjoying their jellyfish feast. ‘If we knew how many species we’ve already eradicated, we might be more motivated to protect those that still survive. This is especially relevant to the large animals of the oceans.’ – Yuval Noah Harari 2 JUNE 2019 Compliance Management Marine Living Resources Act During June, a total of 24 recreational fishing, spearfishing and bait collecting permits were checked by Taylor, Kei and Daniel. Of the 24 permits checked, 6 people (25%) failed to produce a valid permit and were issued a verbal warning. Snares On the 3rd of June the Rangers came across some very rudimentary snares whilst checking some of the woodcutting operations on Fransmanshoek. Old packing strapping was used to create snares and were found tied to the base of bushes with a simple noose knot made at the other end.
    [Show full text]
  • National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West to Britstown
    STAATSKOERANT, 15 OKTOBER 2010 NO.33630 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT No. 904 15 October 2010 THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LIMITED Registration No: 98109584106 DECLARATION AMENDMENT OF NATIONAL ROAD N12 SECTION 6 AMENDMENT OF DECLARATION No. 631 OF 2005 By virtue of section 40(1)(b) of the South African National Roads Agency Limited and the National Roads Act, 1998 (Act NO.7 of 1998), I hereby amend Declaration No. 631 of 2005, by substituting the descriptive section of the route from Victoria West up to Britstown, with the subjoined sheets 1 to 27 of Plan No. P727/08. (National Road N12 Section 6: Victoria West - Britstown) VI ~/ o8 ~I ~ ~ ... ... CD +' +' f->< >< >< lli.S..E..I VICTORIA WEST / Ul ~ '-l Ul ;Ii; o o -// m y 250 »JJ z _-i ERF 2614 U1 iii,..:.. "- \D o lL. C\J a­ Q:: lL. _<n lLJ ~ Q:: OJ olLJ lL. m ~ Q:: Q) lLJ JJ N12/5 lL. ~ fj- Q:: ~ I\J a DECLARATION VICTORIA lLJ ... ... .... PLAN No. P745/09 +' a REM 550 +' :£ >< y -/7 0 >< WEST >< 25 Vel von stel die podreserwe voor von 'n gedeelte Z Die Suid Afrikoonse Nosionole Podogentskop 8eperk Die figuur getoon Sheet 1 of 27 a represents the rood reserve of 0 portion ~:~:~:~: ~ :~: ~:~:~:~:~:~ The figure shown w The South African Notional Roods Agency Limited ........... von Nosionole Roete Seksie 6 Plan w :.:-:-:-:.:.:-:.:-:-:.: N12 OJ of Notional Route Section P727108 w a D.O.9.A • U1 01 o II') g 01' ICTORIA0' z "­ o o (i: WEST \V II> ..... REM ERF 9~5 II') w ...
    [Show full text]
  • 2020/21 Final Integrated Development Plan
    2020/21 FINAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN Contact Details: Head office: 32 Church Street Ladismith 6655 Tel Number: 028 551 1023 Fax: 028 551 1766 Email: [email protected] Website: www.kannaland.gov.za Satellite Offices: Calitzdorp 044 213 3312 Zoar 028 561 1332 Van Wyksdorp 028 581 2354 Page | 1 Strategic Policy Context Vision Statement: The environment influences one’s choice – in this respect, the choice of a working place and residence. It is up to the leaders of this Municipality to create that ideal environment that would not only make those already here to want to remain here, but also to retain and draw the highly skilled ones who would eventually make Kannaland and the Municipality a great place. The mission is to promote: sustainable growth > sustainable human settlements > a healthy community > development and maintenance of infrastructure > increase in opportunities for growth and jobs through: Community Compliance participation Capacity development for service delivery Good Governance Well-maintained municipal infrastructure Effective Inter Relations Effectiveffective disaster management practicese IDP Effective IDP Quality service delivery through a fully functional Municipality Page | 2 Our core values are: Dignity > Respect >Trust > Integrity > Honesty > Diligence Kannaland Re-branding its Corporate Identity: The Municipality in collaboration with the Western Cape Provincial Government have redesign the logo of Kannaland. Through consultation sessions in the four wards conducting by Western Cape Department of Local Government, the community requested the following in terms of the change of logo: • Logo depicting diversity through colour and imagery • Kannaplant to remain • Recommended new – free – fonts • Include the use of Red • Develop slogan speaking to inclusivity • Resultant criteria for design: • Workability, Geometric Unique The new logo will be transformed as below: Mountain Silluette Kannaplant Wine Route The final logo was developed in terms of the characteristics as per requested by the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Telkom Workshop with the Portfolio Committee on Communications in Parliament
    Telkom Workshop with the Portfolio Committee on Communications in Parliament 06 – 07 October 2004 Terms of Reference The Portfolio Committee on Communications has requested Telkom to present on the technical and regulatory aspects of its business 2 Introducing the Telkom Delegation • Nkenke Kekana Group Executive – Regulatory & Public Policy • Benitto Lekalakala Executive – Parliament, Policy & Legislation • Wally Broeders Executive – Integrated Network Planning • Jack Tlokana Senior Specialist – RC: Advanced Technology • Graham Keet Senior Specialist – RC: Special Markets • Josephine Mabotja Senior Specialist – Competition Law & Economics • Izaak Coetzee Senior Specialist - Regulatory Economics • Nozicelo Ngcobo Senior Specialist – Research and Strategy • Keso Mbali Senior Specialist - Multi-media and Convergence • Maphelo Mvunelwa Specialist – Parliamentary Liaison 3 Agenda items • Overview of the Current • Interconnection Regulatory Environment • Carrier Pre-Selection • Overview of the Expected Regulatory Environment • Number Portability • Telkom Licences • Network Planning and Management • Numbering Plans • Square Kilometre Array (SKA) • COA/CAM • Convergence 4 Overview of the Current Regulatory Environment in South Africa International Telecommunications Reform • Early 1990’s - end of telecommunications natural monopoly across the world as administered by governments • Economic and technological developments necessitated a review of the treatment of telecommunications • WTO, ITU, EU and other international bodies reassessed the increasing
    [Show full text]
  • Directorate: Planning & Integrated Services:– Enquiries
    DIRECTORATE: PLANNING & INTEGRATED SERVICES:– ENQUIRIES GENERAL ENQUIRIES General enquiries from the public Ms Helené Bailey ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..5073 TOWN PLANNING Enquiries regarding rezoning, departures, subdivisions, consent uses, relaxation of building lines, zoning certificates and removal of restrictive conditions Mr B Ndwandwe ..................................................................................................................................................................5077 Ms O Louw ...........................................................................................................................................................................5074 Intern ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………6290 Enquiries regarding amendment of structure plan, amendment of urban edge, SDF, flood lines, availability of municipal properties and erven Mr J Roux …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….5071 Enquiries regarding application forms, erven sizes, erven dimensions, locality plans, SG-diagrams, maps (Office hours: 08H00-13H00 and 14H00-15H00) Ms D Truter 5075 Ms D Seconds 5247 Ms L Koen 5166 BUILDING CONTROL – SUBMISSION OF BUILDING PLANS (Office hours: 08H00-13H00 and 14H00-15H00) Enquiries regarding application forms, demolition permits, submission of building plans, copies of building plans Ms D Seconds 5247 Ms L Koen 5166 Ms D Truter 5075 BUILDING CONTROL – PROGRESS AND APPROVAL OF BUILDING PLANS Progress of submitted building plans (Enquiries from 7:45 to 10:00)
    [Show full text]
  • Danabaai on the Cape South Coast (Figure 1)
    Archaeological Impact Assessment with comment on Palaeontology by Dr John Almond Proposed Moquini Beach Hotel, Erf 14796, Mossel Bay, Eden, Western Province prepared for Mr. Dale Holder Cape Environmental Assessment Practitioners (Cape EAPrac) PO Box 2070, George, 6530, Tel: 044 874 0365, Fax: 044 874 0432 [email protected] by Centre for Heritage and Archaeological Resource Management cc Peter Nilssen, CHARM, PO Box 176, Great Brak River, 6525 044 620 4936 | 0827835896 | [email protected] | www.carm.co.za Company No. CK 2006\133900\23 23 May 2010 VAT No. 4240230989 Executive Summary In accordance with the National Heritage Resources Act (Act 25 of 1999), an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) was conducted for the above-named project on 18 May 2010. Apart from a pipeline and disused road running through the property, the sediments in the study area appear relatively undisturbed. The area along and immediately adjacent to the disused road is vegetated by a mix of indigenous and exotic species with rooikrans dominating. Aside this swathe, coastal Fynbos covering the remainder of the property is in pristine condition. Archaeological investigation was restricted by dense, impenetrable vegetation cover, but a large part of the proposed development footprint was accessible on foot and open to archaeological inspection and assessment. Two very ephemeral scatters of marine shell were recorded, but due to context and make-up, the age of their deposition is uncertain. A recent poacher’s heap of Alikreukel (Olicroc) shells casts further doubt as to the archaeological origins of the afore-mentioned occurrences. No further archaeological or tangible heritage related resources were identified in the study area, but it is possible that such materials occur under dense vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Seakeys Monitoring Working Group Workshop Report
    SeaKeys Monitoring Working Group Workshop Report By: Dr. Lara Atkinson1, Dr. Kerry Sink2, Ms. Hannah Raven1and Ms. Mari‐Lise Franken2 Maps by: Heather Terrapon2 August 2016 1 South African Environmental Observation Network, Egagasini, Cape Town 2 South African National Biodiversity Institute, Kirstenbosch, Cape Town SeaKeys Monitoring Working Group Workshop Report Workshop held 11th November 2015, SANBI Colophon room Table of Contents SEAKEYS PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................ 1 MONITORING WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................. 2 A) PRESENTATIONS FROM WORKSHOP PARTICIPANTS: .............................................................................. 3 LARGE MOORING ARRAYS ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 ALGOA BAY SENTINEL SITE ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 INTEGRATED ECOSYSTEM PROGRAMME ........................................................................................................................................... 7 WASTE WATER OUTFALL MONITORING ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mossel Bay Municipality Idp Budget & Pms Representative Forum 20 May 2021
    MOSSEL BAY MUNICIPALITY IDP BUDGET & PMS REPRESENTATIVE FORUM 20 MAY 2021 DRAFT IDP & BUDGETPUBLIC CONSULTATION • NO PHYSICAL PUBLIC MEETINGS: Limit risk of spreading Covid19 • INPUT SUBMISSION: DUE 30 APRIL 2021 • Email to [email protected] (IDP Related) OR [email protected] (Budget related) • Hand deliver written submissions to 101 Marsh Street • Post to: Private Bag X29, Mossel Bay, 6500 • Facebook live ward based Schedule: FACEBOOK LIVE: IDP & BUDGET CONSULTATION SCHEDULE DATE: APRIL 2021 DAY TIME WARD 07 Wednesday 18:00 6 & 8 08 Thursday 18:00 7 12 Monday 18:00 9 13 Tuesday 18:00 10 14 Wednesday 18:00 11 15 Thursday 18:00 12 19 Monday 18:00 13 20 Tuesday 18:00 14 21 Wednesday 18:00 1,2, & 3 22 Thursday 18:00 4 & 5 2020/2021 MID TERM PERFORMANCE Municipal Financial Corporate Community Planning and Infrastructure Manager Services Services Services Economic Services Development BUDGET OVERVIEW 2021-2022 BUDGET [VALUE] [PERCENTAGE] [VALUE] [PERCENTAGE] Operating Capital 2020-2021 Adj 2021-2022 % Increase / % of Total BUDGET BUDGET (Decrease) R 1 289 617 231 R 1 363 936 094 5.8 85.0 R 252 928 080 R 241 084 372 -4.7 15.0 R 1 542 545 311 R 1 605 020 466 4.1 100.0 21/22 MTREF DRAFT CAPITAL BUDGET – PER SOURCE FUNDING SOURCE 2021/2022 % of TOTAL BUDGET Capital Replacement Reserve (Internal) R 122 566 591 50.8% Municipal Infrastructure Grant R 21 980 000 9.1% Development of Sport & Recreation R 265 217 0.1% Facility Grant Integrated National Electrification R 8 718 261 3.6% Programme Department of Human Settlement R 53 913 043 22.4%
    [Show full text]
  • LADISMITH Tel : (028) 551 8000 6655 Fax : (028) 551 1766
    KANNALAND MUNICIPALITY FIFTH FINAL INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (IDP) REVIEW 2016/17 PO Box 30 P.O. Box [email protected] LADISMITH Tel : (028) 551 8000 6655 Fax : (028) 551 1766 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE __________________________________________________________________________ 16 Foreword Executive Mayor ____________________________________________________________ 22 Foreword by the Municipal Manager ____________________________________________________ 23 CHAPTER 1 ________________________________________________________________________ 25 1 Introduction _____________________________________________________________________ 25 1.1 Background __________________________________________________________________ 25 1.2 Role and purpose of Integrated Development Plan ___________________________________ 26 1.3 Kannaland IDP’s strategic alignment with National, Provincial and District Government ______ 26 1.4 Mandate ____________________________________________________________________ 28 1.4.1 The Millennium Developmental Goals _________________________________________ 28 1.4.2 National Development Plan (NDP) –Vision for 2030 _______________________________ 29 1.4.3 National Government Outcomes _____________________________________________ 29 1.4.4 Provincial Strategic Objectives _______________________________________________ 30 1.4.5 Eden District Municipality’s Strategic Goals _____________________________________ 31 1.4.6 Kannaland Municipality’s Key Performance Areas (Strategic Objectives) ______________ 31 1.5 Kannaland IDP Process _________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]