DOCSLIB.ORG

B-54 Geology and Mineral Resources of the Paleozoic Area in Northwest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
B-54 Geology and Mineral Resources of the Paleozoic Area in Northwest Georgia State Division of Conservation DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY Garland Peyton, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bulletin Number 54 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE PALEOZOIC AREA IN NORTHWEST GEORGIA By Charles Butts Geologist, U. S. G. S. (Retired) and Benjamin Gildersleeve Geologist, TVA Published in Cooperation with the Tennessee Valley Authority ATLANTA 1948 Georgia State Division of Conservation DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY Garland Peyton, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Bulletin Number 54 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF THE PALEOZOIC AREA IN NORTHWEST GEORGIA By Charles Butts Geologist, U.S. G. S. (Retired) and Benjamin Gildersleeve Geologist, TVA Published in Cooperation with the Tennessee Valley Authority ATLANTA 1948 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Department of Mines, Mining and Geology Atlanta, November 8, 1947 To His Excellency, M. E. Thompson, Acting Governor Commissioner Ex-Officio, State Division of Conservation Sir: I have the honor to submit herewith Georgia Geological Survey Bulletin No. 54, "Geology and Mineral Resources of the Paleozoic Area in North­ west Georgia," by Charles Butts and Benjamin Gildersleeve. The publica­ tion of this bulletin at this time fills an urgent and long-felt need for an up-to-date treatise upon the geology and mineral resources in one of Georgia's most active commercial mining areas. The report contains a manuscript on the geology and stratigraphy, a companion manuscript on the economic minerals of the area, a mineral map and a geologic map, both of which are on a scale large enough to be of practical use. It is believed that this report will be received with universal approval and utilization by both geologists and industrialists. One unusual economic feature is the inclusion in the bulletin of complete chemical analyses made on representative samples of all the limestone in northwest Georgia. This will enable the industrialist to determine before­ hand the approximate location of the type of limestone for which he may have need in his manufacturing process. Another unusual feature of the report is the publication for the first time in a Georgia Geological Survey bulletin of a representative group of fossil plates and pictures. The manner of preparing and publishing this report is another example of the value of cooperation between a federal and a state agency. The Department of Mines, Mining and Geology did not have available the personnel or the facilities for doing the field work and preparing the bulletin and the maps alone. Due to a working agreement which has existed between this department and the Tennessee Valley Authority. we were able to obtain the cooperation of the Minerals Research Section of the Commerce Department of the 'I'ennessee Valley Authority. This cooperation included the revision of existing geologic manuscripts and maps, the preparation of the economic section of the report, the preparation of illustrations and fossil plates, and the publishing of the two large-scale maps referred to above. Without this cooperation, it would h<ive been utterly impracticable for this department to have undertaken such a ramified project alone. It is our belief that the publication of this excellent report at this time will serve to stimulate increased activity leading toward a more proper development and utilization of the mineral resources of northwest Georgia. Very respectfully yours, Garland Peyton, Director. IIJ CONTENTS Page Preface .................................................................................................................. 1 GEOLOGY OF THE PALEOZOIC AREA IN NORTHWEST GEORGIA, by Charles Butts........................................................................ 3 Introduction ................ .. .............. ....... ..... .... .............. .... ........................................ 3 Location and extent.......................................................................................... 3 Previous work .... ......... ........... .... ...... .......... .... .. ...... ...... .................... ................ 3 Physiography ......................................................................................................... 5 Stratigraphy ........................................................................................................ 7 Cambrian system .... ................ ..... ............ ......... ................................................ 8 Weisner quartzite ........................................................................................ 8 Shady dolomite .............................................................................................. 9 Rome formation ............................................................................................ 11 Conasauga formation .................................................................................. 14 Cambrian and Ordovician (U.S.G.S.) or Ozarkian and Canadian (of E. 0. Ulrich) ............................................................................ 16 Knox dolomite ................................................................................................ 16 Ordovician system ................................ ............ ............ ............ ............ ............ 18 "Chickamauga limestone" .......................................................................... 18 N ewala limestone .... ................................ ........ ........ .................. .................... 19 Hiatus ............................................................................................................ 22 Stones River group ........................................................................................ 22 Murfreesboro limestone .......................................................................... 22 Mosheim limestone ...................................................................................• 24 Lenoir (Ridley) limestone........................................................................ 25 Lebanon limestone .................................................................................... 26 Blount group ................................................................................................ 27 Holston marble .......................................................................................... 28 Athens shale ................................................................................. ~ ............ 28 Tellico formation ··········································'··········································· 29 Otto see (Sevier) shale.............................................................................. 29 Lowville-Moccasin limestone ...................................................................... 30 Trenton limestone ........................................................................................ 32 Maysville formation .................................................................................... 32 Silurian system ....... ......................... .... ............ ................ ........................ ........ 33 Sequatchie formation .................................................................................. 33 Red Mountain formation .............................................................................. 35 Devonian system ........ ......... ............... ........ .. .. ........ .............................. ........ .... 38 Armuchee chert ............................................................................................ 38 Chattanooga shale ........................................................................................ 39 Mississiopian system ........................................................................................ 41 Fort Payne chert............................................................................................ 42 "Bangor" limestone ................ .................... ........ .... .............. .......... .............. 45 St. Louis limestone........................................................................................ 45 Ste. Genevieve limestone.......................................................................... 46 Gasper limestone ...................................................................................... 46 Golconda limestone .................................................................................. 47 Hartselle sandstone ........................................................................... :....... 48 Bangor limestone (restricted) ................................................................ 48 Pennington shale ...................................................................................... 49 Floyd shale ............. ....... ....... ... .. .... ................ .... .... ........ .. .. ............................ 49 v CONTENTS- (Continued) Page Rockmart slate .............................................................................................. 52 Pennsylvanian system ...................................................................................... 54 Pottsville formation ..................................................................................... 54 Structure .................................................................................... :...•....................... 56 General statement ............................................................................................ 56 Details of structure ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fiscal Year 2015 Budget
    FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2015 BUDGET CITY OF MARIETTA, GEORGIA JULY 2014 – JUNE 2015 WILLIAM F. BRUTON, JR. CITY MANAGER SAM LADY FINANCE DIRECTOR LORI DUNCAN BUDGET MANAGER DIANE SELLITTO BUDGET ANALYST MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL R. Steve Tumlin, Jr. Mayor Stuart Fleming Griffin “Grif” L. Chalfant, Jr. Councilmember, Ward 1 Councilmember, Ward 2 Johnny Walker G.A. (Andy) Morris Councilmember, Ward 3 Councilmember, Ward 4 Rev. Anthony C. Coleman Michelle Cooper Kelly Philip M. Goldstein Councilmember, Ward 5 Councilmember, Ward 6 Councilmember, Ward 7 ii OFFICIALS Mayor and City Council R. Steve Tumlin, Jr. Mayor Stuart Fleming Ward 1 Griffin “Grif” L. Chalfant, Jr. Ward 2 Johnny Walker Ward 3 G. A. “Andy” Morris Ward 4 Rev. Anthony C. Coleman Ward 5 Michelle Cooper Kelly Ward 6 Philip M. Goldstein Ward 7 Board of Lights and Water R. Steve Tumlin, Jr., Mayor Chairperson G. A. “Andy” Morris, Councilmember Board Member Bruce E. Coyle Board Member Terry G. Lee Board Member Alice R. Summerour Board Member J. Brian Torras Board Member Michael G. Wilson Board Member City / BLW Administration William F. Bruton, Jr. City Manager / Acting BLW General Manager Pamela Allen Municipal Court Administrator Ronald Barrett Information Technology Director Shannon Barrett Assistant to the City Manager Shannon Barrett Acting Human Resources and Risk Mgmt. Director Thomas Bell Electrical Director Brian Binzer Development Services Director Richard Buss Parks, Recreation and Facilities Director Daniel Conn Public Works Director Barry Echols Utility Marketing Director Daniel Flynn Police Chief Jackie Gibbs Fire Chief Stephanie Guy City Clerk Douglas R. Haynie City Attorney Sam Lady Finance Director J.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Carboniferous Bryozoans from La Hermida, Spain
    Late Carboniferous bryozoans from La Hermida, Spain Andrej Ernst and Elke Minwegen Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51 (3), 2006: 569-588 Fifteen bryozoan species belonging to thirteen genera have been identified from an outcrop of the Picos de Europa Formation (Moscovian, Upper Carboniferous) at La Hermida in northern Spain. Three species and one genus are new Coscinium hermidensis sp. nov., Cystodictya pustulosa sp. nov., and Cystocladia hispanica gen. et sp. nov. Rhabdomesid bryozoans are the most diverse order with seven species, followed by cystoporids (four species), fenestellids (three species) and trepostomids (one species). Bryozoans with erect branched or reticulate colonies dominate in the studied assemblage; only two species possess encrusting colonies. Together with associated crinoids, the bryozoan assemblage indicates a subtidal environment below the zone of vigorous water movement. The La Hermida bryozoan fauna confirms the Upper Carboniferous age of the Picos de Europa Formation and allows various biogeographical interpretations. All previously known species of the genus Coscinium were reported from the Lower Permian of Russia. Clausotrypa monticola is known from the Lower Permian of Russia and Arctic as well as from the Upper Carboniferous of Carnic Alps (Austria). Rhabdomeson cf. propatulissimum and Penniretepora pseudotrilineata are known from the same level of Italian Carnic Alps. Streblotrypa (Streblascopora ) nikiforovae and Rhombocladia punctata are known from the Upper Carboniferous (Moscovian) of Ukraine. Fistulipora petaloida is known from Kasimovian Stage of Russian Plate. Several other species show connections with North America. Key words: Bryozoa, Cystoporida, Fenestellida, Carboniferous, Picos de Europa Formation, Spain. Andrej Ernst [email protected], Institut für Geowissenschaften, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Ludewig-Meyn-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Crinoids from Lower Mississippian Rocks in Southeastern Kentucky
    TWO NEW CRINOIDS FROM LOWER MISSISSIPPIAN ROCKS IN SOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY BY GEORGE M. EHLERS AND ROBERT V. KESLING Reprinted from JOURNAL OF PALEONTOLOGY Val. 37, No. 5, September, 1963 JOURNALOF PALEONTOLOGY,V. 37, NO. 5, P. 1028-1041, PLS. 133,134, 3 TEXT-FIGS., SEPTEMBER,1963 TWO NEW CRINOIDS FROM L20\'C7ERMISSISSIPPIAN ROCKS IN SOUTHEASTERN KENTUCKY GEORGE M. EHLERS AKD ROBERT V. ICESLING Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan .~BsTR.~~T-AII~~~~specimens collected many years ago bl- the senior author and his students near Mill Springs, Kentucky, are a new species of Agaricocrinzis and a new speries of Actino- crinites. Although only one specimen of each is known, it is well preserved. The new Agnrico- crinus bears a resemblance to A. ponderoszts Wood, and the new Actinocriniles to four species described by Miller & Gurley: A. spergenensis, A. botuztosz~s,A. gibsoni, and A. shnronensis. A preliminary survey of species assigned to Agaricocrinz~ssuggests that revision of the genus is overdue. Although the occurrence of the specimens leaves some doubt as to their stratigraphic posi- tion, we conclude that they both probably weathered from the Fort Payne formation and rolled down the slope onto the New Providence, where they were found. The sites where the crinoids were picked up are now deeply inundated by water impounded by the Wolf Creek dam on the Cumberland River. INTRODUCTION onto the New Providence, \$here they were OTH of the new crinoids described here are found. rZt present, both the New Providence B from Lower Mississippian rocks in the valley formation and the I~asalbeds of the Fort Payne of the Cumberland River in Wayne and Russell are underwater at the type locality of the new Counties, Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • May 9–13, 2017 Programming Schedule
    May 9–13, 2017 Programming Schedule *ALL SCHEDULES SUBJECT TO CHANGE* The FARMERS’ MARKET, WORKSHOPS, SEMINARS/PRESENTATIONS and OUTDOOR EXCURSION SIGN– UPS will take place at: LeConte Center at Pigeon Forge 2986 Teaster Lane Pigeon Forge, TN 37863 Wilderness Wildlife Week’s 2nd Appalachian Homecoming featuring storytelling, music, antique tractor show, non–profit picnic fundraiser and more will begin at 5 PM on Friday, May 12th at: Patriot Park 186 Old Mill Avenue Pigeon Forge, TN 37863 LeConte Center Hours Information Desk: Open Tuesday to Thursday, from 7 AM – 9 PM Information Desk: Open Friday, from 7 AM – 4:30 PM Information Desk: Open Saturday, from 7 AM – 8 PM Farmers’ Market Hours: Open Tuesday thru Saturday from 8:30 AM – 2:30 PM Pre–registration Desk: Open Tuesday thru Saturday from 8 AM – 3 PM Pre–registration for LIMITED! Sessions will take the morning of each day for that day’s sessions Vendor/Exhibit Hall: Open daily from 9 AM – 6 PM in LeConte Exhibit Hall *Note: Vendor Hall will close at 4 PM on Friday, May 12. Photography Exhibit opens Tuesday, May 9 from 2 PM to 6 PM. Hours for Wednesday, May 10 until Saturday, May 13 from 9 AM until 6 PM. Photography Exhibit Special Hours: Friday, May 12 from 9 AM until 4 PM. Education Stations located in LeConte Hall. 1 Tuesday, May 9 9 AM: Tuesday Outdoor Excursion Sign-ups – Greenbrier Hall A 9 – 10 AM: NEW! Guiding in the National Parks and Wilderness Areas of the United States: Chris Hoge – North 1 9 – 11 AM: NEW! LIMITED! Design Your Own Bird Greeting Cards: Louise Bales – North 3B Limit 10 Participants must preregister at Registration Table for all LIMITED! sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of Altenburg Quadrangle, Jackson County
    BEDROCK GEOLOGY OF ALTENBURG QUADRANGLE Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability William W. Shilts, Executive Director JACKSON COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND PERRY COUNTY, MISSOURI STATEMAP Altenburg-BG ILLINOIS STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY E. Donald McKay III, Interim Director Mary J. Seid, Joseph A. Devera, Allen L. Weedman, and Dewey H. Amos 2009 360 GEOLOGIC UNITS ) ) ) 14 Qal Alluvial deposits ) 13 18 Quaternary Pleistocene and Holocene 17 360 ) 15 360 16 14 0 36 ) 13 Qf Fan deposits ) Unconformity Qal ) & 350 tl Lower Tradewater Formation Atokan ) ) Pennsylvanian 360 ) &cv Caseyville Formation Morrowan 24 360 ) Unconformity ) 17 Upper Elviran undivided, Meu ) Waltersburg to top of Degonia 19 20 Qal 21 22 23 ) 24 ) Mv Vienna Limestone 360 o ) 3 Mts ) 350 Mts Tar Springs Sandstone ) 20 360 ) Mgd 360 30 ) Mgd Glen Dean Limestone ) 21 350 360 Mts 29 ) Qal Hardinsburg Sandstone and J N Mhg Chesterian ) Golconda Formations h Æ Qal Mav anc 28 27 Br ) N oJ 26 25 JN 85 N ) Cypress Sandstone through J Mcpc Dsl 500 Paint Creek Formation JN N ) J o Mts N 5 J s ) Dgt 600 J N 70 J N Mgd Yankeetown Formation s ) Myr Db 80 28 Æ and Renault Sandstone N J 29 N J N ) Sb J Mgd Mississippian o Dgt Ssc 25 Clines o N 25 Msg 27 ) Qal J 80 s 3 Mav Aux Vases Sandstone N J N Mts o MILL J MISSISSIPPI 34 ) Qal J N ) N J Dsl 35 N 26 J o N 25 J Mgd Mgd ) Msg Ste. Genevieve Limestone 500 o Db DITCH J 20 Mgd N N N ) J J o RIVER o N 600 J 80 N ) 10 o J Mav Æ Msl St.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Predictive Foraging Models for Gray Bats in Northwest Georgia and a Comparison of Two Acoustical Bat Survey Techniques
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2002 Spatial and predictive foraging models for gray bats in northwest Georgia and a comparison of two acoustical bat survey techniques Joshua Begg Johnson West Virginia University Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Johnson, Joshua Begg, "Spatial and predictive foraging models for gray bats in northwest Georgia and a comparison of two acoustical bat survey techniques" (2002). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 1476. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/1476 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SPATIAL AND PREDICTIVE FORAGING MODELS FOR GRAY BATS IN NORTHWEST GEORGIA AND A COMPARISON OF TWO ACOUSTICAL BAT SURVEY TECHNIQUES Joshua B. Johnson Thesis submitted to the College of Agriculture, Forestry, and Consumer Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Resources W.
    [Show full text]
  • IC-29 Geology and Ground Water Resources of Walker County, Georgia
    IC 29 GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 29 GEOLOGY AND GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF WALKER COUNTY, GEORGIA By Charles W. Cressler U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Geological Survey ATLANTA 1964 CONTENTS Page Abstract _______________________________________________ -··---------------------------- _____________________ ----------------·----- _____________ __________________________ __ 3 In trodu ction ------------------------------------------ ________________________________ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Purpose and scope ------------------------------"--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Previous inv es tigati o ns ____ _____ ________ _______ __________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 Geo Io gy _________________________________________________________________ --- ___________________ -- ___________ ------------- __________________ ---- _________________ ---- _______ 5 Ph ys i ogr a p hy ______________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------- __________________ -------------------------------- 5 Geo Io gi c his tory __________________________ _ __ ___ ___ _______ _____________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------- 5 Stratigraphy -·· __________________
    [Show full text]
  • May 8–12, 2018
    May 8–12, 2018 Event Program Schedule – Web Edition *NOTE 1: All schedules subject to change. *NOTE 2: For all outdoor excursions including hikes, bus trips and activities, please review the specific Outdoor Excursions Schedule for sign-ups and refer to the Outdoor Excursions Procedures and Rules. Tuesday, May 8 8 AM: LeConte Center at Pigeon Forge Main Entrance opens 9 – 10 AM: NEW! HERITAGE! Frontier Life: Women’s Role in Western Frontier Living in North Carolina (present-day East Tennessee) – Overmountain Victory Trail Association – Greenbriar Hall A 9 – 4 PM: Pre–registration for Tuesday, May 8 LIMITED Sessions – Preregistration Table 9:30 – 10:30 AM: Wildflowers of the Smokies – Jack Carman – North 3A 9:30 – 11:30 AM: All About Spin Fishing Great Smoky Mountains National Park Area Stocked Trout Streams, As Well As Local Smallmouth – Greg Ward – North 3B Join Greg as he discusses spin fishing techniques while relating his lifetime of fishing knowledge. 10 – 11 AM: NEW! All About Firewise in Pigeon Forge – Kevin Nunn and Matt Lovitt – North 1B Join Pigeon Forge Firefighters Kevin and Matt with the Tennessee Division of Forestry as they discuss the historical perspective of wildfires in East Tennessee, wildfire prevention in Pigeon Forge and recommendations relating to keeping your homes safe through Firewise practices. 10 – 11 AM: NEW! Wilderness Wildlife Week 48 Hour Film Race Registration and Kickoff – Greenbriar Hall C 10 – 6 PM: Wilderness Wildlife Week Digital Display Photography Contest and Special Displays opens – North 1A 10
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in The
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-K Chapter K Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through Southwestern and South-Central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER, ANITA G. HARRIS, and JOHN E. REPETSKI Stratigraphic framework of the Cambrian and Ordovician sequence in part of the central Appalachian basin and the structure of underlying block-faulted basement rocks U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839 EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Ryder, Robert T. Stratigraphic framework of Cambrian and Ordovician rocks in the central Appalachian Basin from Medina County, Ohio, through southwestern and south-central Pennsylvania to Hampshire County, West Virginia / by Robert T. Ryder, Anita C. Harris, and John E. Repetski. p. cm. (Evolution of sedimentary basins Appalachian Basin ; ch. K) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839-K) Includes bibliographical references. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1839-K 1. Geology, Stratigraphic Cambrian.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia's Mountain Treasure Areas - 2018
    Georgia's Mountain Treasure Areas - 2018 In previous Mountain Total Name Cluster Treasures Acres County Trails Hidden Creek Armuchee yes 6,429 Gordon None Johns Mountain Armuchee partially 8,451 Walker, Chattooga, Floyd Pinhoti, Keown Falls, Dry Creek Rocky Face Armuchee partially 8,624 Whitfield, Walker Pinhoti Rabun Bald Chattooga Watershed yes 17,814 Rabun Bartram, Three Forks, Pinnacle Ellicott Rock Extension Chattooga Watershed partially 3,969 Rabun None Rock Gorge Chattooga Watershed yes 3,881 Rabun Foothills Three Forks Chattooga Watershed yes 6,075 Rabun Three forks Five Falls Chattooga Watershed yes 7,488 Rabun Water Gauge, Raven Rcok Thrifts Ferry Chattooga Watershed yes 5,976 Rabun Bartram, Chattooga River Big Shoals Chattooga Watershed partially 5,635 Rabun Bartram, Willis Knob Horse Grassy Mountain Cohutta yes 9,746 Murray Windy Gap, Rocky Flats, Milma Creek Mountaintown Cohutta yes 15,604 Gimer, Fannin Benton MacKaye, Pinhoti, Bear Creek Cohutta Extensions Cohutta partially 5,239 Fannin, Murray Benton MacKaye, Pinhoti,South Fork, Horseshoe Bend Emery Creek Cohutta yes 4,277 Murray Emory Creek Buzzard Knob Northern Blue Ridge yes 9,612 Rabun, Towns None Kelly Ridge Northern Blue Ridge yes 10,408 Rabun, Towns AT Patterson Gap Northern Blue Ridge yes 5,591 Rabun None Southern Nantahala Extensions Northern Blue Ridge yes 7,200 Towns, Rabun None Andrews Cove Northern Blue Ridge partially 4,706 White, Towns AT, Andrews Cove, Rocky Mountain Brasstown Extension Northern Blue Ridge partially 5,087 Towns, Union Miller Trek High Shoals
    [Show full text]
  • Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: United Kingdom
    Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: United Kingdom September 2015 Independent Statistics & Analysis U.S. Department of Energy www.eia.gov Washington, DC 20585 September 2015 This report was prepared by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy. By law, EIA’s data, analyses, and forecasts are independent of approval by any other officer or employee of the United States Government. The views in this report therefore should not be construed as representing those of the Department of Energy or other Federal agencies. U.S. Energy Information Administration | Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources i September 2015 Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Resource categories ................................................................................................................................. 3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Key exclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 6 United Kingdom…………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………………......XI-1
    [Show full text]
  • Wyse Jackson, Patrick N., 2011. a Transatlantic Bryozoological Spat
    Paper in: Patrick N. Wyse Jackson & Mary E. Spencer Jones (eds) (2011) Annals of Bryozoology 3: aspects of the history of research on bryozoans. International Bryozoology Association, Dublin, pp. viii+225. A BRYOZOOLOGICAL SPAT: E.O. ULRICH & G.R. VINE 219 A transatlantic bryozoological spat: Edward Oscar Ulrich (1857–1944) versus George Robert Vine (1825–1893) Patrick N. Wyse Jackson Department of Geology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland Ever since the commencement of scientific publication the views of the authors have been available to others to agree with or to find fault with. Without scientific debate it is unlikely that major scientific advancements could have been made. The differences of opinion of a number of scientific combatants have in the past led to long-term animosities. In the field of geology and palaeontology there are a number of well-known instances: James Hutton produced an abstract of his ideas on the history of the Earth in 1785, but was stung into publishing his full-length Theory of the Earth in 1795 following criticism leveled at him by various opponents including the Irishman and chemist Richard Kirwan (McIntyre 1997, Wyse Jackson 1998). The two close-friends and stratigraphers Adam Sedgwick and Roderick Impey Murchison, who together named the Devonian in 1839, ultimately fell-out when the latter’s Silurian encroached on the former’s Cambrian successions (Secord 1986). During the so-called ‘Bone-wars’, that raged in the United States during the late-nineteenth century, Edward Drinker Cope and Othniel Charles Marsh argued over the reconstructions and significance of many dinosaur specimens that each had discovered (Shor 1974, Jaffe 2000).
    [Show full text]