Marine Animal Entanglements in Mussel Aquaculture Gear Documented Cases from Mussel Farming Regions of the World Including First-Hand Accounts from Iceland

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Marine Animal Entanglements in Mussel Aquaculture Gear Documented Cases from Mussel Farming Regions of the World Including First-Hand Accounts from Iceland Master‘s thesis Marine animal entanglements in mussel aquaculture gear Documented cases from mussel farming regions of the world including first-hand accounts from Iceland Madeline Olivia Young Advisors: Halldór P. Halldórsson and Scott Lindell University of Akureyri Faculty of Business and Science University Centre of the Westfjords Master of Resource Management: Coastal and Marine Management Ísafjörður, May 2015 Supervisory Committee Advisors: Halldór P. Halldórsson, Ph.D. Scott Lindell, MSc. Reader: Áslaug Ásgeirsdóttir, Ph.D. Program Director: Dagný Arnarsdóttir, MSc. Madeline Olivia Young Marine animal entanglements in mussel aquaculture gear: Documented cases from mussel farming regions of the world including first-hand accounts from Iceland 45 ECTS thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of a Master of Resource Management degree in Coastal and Marine Management at the University Centre of the Westfjords, Suðurgata 12, 400 Ísafjörður, Iceland Degree accredited by the University of Akureyri, Faculty of Business and Science, Borgir, 600 Akureyri, Iceland Copyright © 2015 Madeline Olivia Young All rights reserved Printing: Háskólaprent, Reykjavík, May 2015 Declaration I hereby confirm that I am the sole author of this thesis and it is a product of my own academic research. ___________________________________ Student‘s name Abstract Mussel aquaculture utilizes various ropes in the water column that may pose an entanglement risk to cetaceans and sea turtles. In contrast to fishing gear, however, there are far fewer documented entanglement cases in mussel aquaculture gear. With that being said, there has been little data collected on this issue to date. Due to the growing demand for aquaculture and potential expansion into offshore areas, interactions with cetaceans and sea turtles are likely to continue and even increase into the future. In Iceland, the mussel aquaculture industry is currently small and largely experimental, but there is potential for expansion. The development of a successful management plan is dependent on understanding what type and part of the gear poses the greatest entanglement risk, as well as the location and timing of events in relation to cetacean feeding and migration patterns. The objective of this thesis is to lay the foundation for future studies regarding cetacean and sea turtle entanglements in mussel aquaculture gear. Documented entanglement cases were collected from mussel farming regions of the world via media outlets, academic articles, secondary sources, and informal interviews. Primary data collection was then undertaken in Iceland using online surveys and semi-structured interviews with mussel operators. In total, seven entanglement reports were collected, including four baleen whales, one harbour porpoise, and two leatherback turtles. A majority of cases involved mussel spat collecting ropes, which suggests this part of the gear may pose the greatest entanglement risk. Two entanglement reports were from Iceland, where there is likely proximity between cetacean distributions and mussel farming sites. Summer spat collection also coincides with the highest densities of cetaceans in Icelandic waters. Management suggestions for Iceland may include the implementation of a reporting system for entanglements in aquaculture gear and studies looking into areas where spat collection can occur with low likelihood of encountering cetaceans. Keywords: Cetaceans, entanglement, Iceland, mussel aquaculture, mussel farming, sea turtles. This thesis is dedicated to Oliver, Lisa, Alex, and Lucy. Table of Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................................... xi List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... xiii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ xv 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 17 1.1 Research ................................................................................................................. 18 1.1.1 Objective ...................................................................................................... 18 1.1.2 Research questions ....................................................................................... 18 1.1.3 Methods ........................................................................................................ 19 1.1.4 Scope ............................................................................................................ 19 1.2 Thesis organization ................................................................................................ 20 2 Literature overview ...................................................................................................... 21 2.1 Aquaculture ............................................................................................................ 21 2.2 Mussel aquaculture ................................................................................................ 21 2.2.1 Global production ........................................................................................ 22 2.2.2 Mussel aquaculture techniques and gear ...................................................... 22 2.2.3 Mussel farming in Iceland ........................................................................... 27 2.3 Marine megafauna interactions .............................................................................. 31 2.3.1 Species groups discussed ............................................................................. 31 2.3.2 Interactions with aquaculture ....................................................................... 33 2.3.3 Entanglement ............................................................................................... 34 2.3.4 Entanglement reports of cetaceans and sea turtles in mussel gear ............... 41 2.3.5 Changing species distributions and abundances .......................................... 45 2.4 Management and mitigation .................................................................................. 46 2.4.1 Fishing gear vs. aquaculture gear ................................................................. 47 2.4.2 Fixed fisheries .............................................................................................. 48 2.4.3 Shellfish aquaculture .................................................................................... 52 2.5 Cetaceans in Icelandic waters ................................................................................ 54 2.5.1 Species abundances and distributions .......................................................... 55 2.5.2 Bycatch ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5.3 Attitudes towards cetaceans in Iceland ........................................................ 63 3 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 65 3.1 Surveys and interviews .......................................................................................... 67 3.1.1 Selection of participants ............................................................................... 67 3.1.2 Survey design ............................................................................................... 67 3.1.3 Survey limitations ........................................................................................ 70 3.1.4 Interview design and process ....................................................................... 71 3.1.5 Interview limitations .................................................................................... 72 3.2 Site locations .......................................................................................................... 73 ix 4 Results ............................................................................................................................. 75 4.1 Surveys ................................................................................................................... 75 4.2 Interviews ............................................................................................................... 80 4.3 Site locations ........................................................................................................... 84 5 Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 85 5.1 Summary of entanglement reports .......................................................................... 85 5.2 Iceland .................................................................................................................... 86 6 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................... 91 7 Future research and management recommendations ................................................ 92 References ........................................................................................................................... 95 Appendix A: Online survey ............................................................................................. 105 Appendix B: Interview guides ........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Impacts of Ocean Acidification on Marine Shelled Molluscs
    Mar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00227-013-2219-3 ORIGINAL PAPER Impacts of ocean acidification on marine shelled molluscs Fre´de´ric Gazeau • Laura M. Parker • Steeve Comeau • Jean-Pierre Gattuso • Wayne A. O’Connor • Sophie Martin • Hans-Otto Po¨rtner • Pauline M. Ross Received: 18 January 2013 / Accepted: 15 March 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract Over the next century, elevated quantities of ecosystem services including habitat structure for benthic atmospheric CO2 are expected to penetrate into the oceans, organisms, water purification and a food source for other causing a reduction in pH (-0.3/-0.4 pH unit in the organisms. The effects of ocean acidification on the growth surface ocean) and in the concentration of carbonate ions and shell production by juvenile and adult shelled molluscs (so-called ocean acidification). Of growing concern are the are variable among species and even within the same impacts that this will have on marine and estuarine species, precluding the drawing of a general picture. This organisms and ecosystems. Marine shelled molluscs, which is, however, not the case for pteropods, with all species colonized a large latitudinal gradient and can be found tested so far, being negatively impacted by ocean acidifi- from intertidal to deep-sea habitats, are economically cation. The blood of shelled molluscs may exhibit lower and ecologically important species providing essential pH with consequences for several physiological processes (e.g. respiration, excretion, etc.) and, in some cases, increased mortality in the long term. While fertilization Communicated by S. Dupont. may remain unaffected by elevated pCO2, embryonic and Fre´de´ric Gazeau and Laura M.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Mussels (Mytilus Edulis Spp.) As Sentinel Organisms in Coastal Pollution Monitoring: a Review
    Accepted Manuscript Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: A review Jonny Beyer, Norman W. Green, Steven Brooks, Ian J. Allan, Anders Ruus, Tânia Gomes, Inger Lise N. Bråte, Merete Schøyen PII: S0141-1136(17)30266-0 DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.07.024 Reference: MERE 4356 To appear in: Marine Environmental Research Received Date: 20 April 2017 Revised Date: 28 July 2017 Accepted Date: 31 July 2017 Please cite this article as: Beyer, J., Green, N.W., Brooks, S., Allan, I.J., Ruus, A., Gomes, Tâ., Bråte, I.L.N., Schøyen, M., Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: A review, Marine Environmental Research (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2017.07.024. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution 2 monitoring: A review 3 Jonny Beyer a,*, Norman W. Green a, Steven Brooks a, Ian J. Allan a, Anders Ruus a,b , Tânia Gomes a, 4 Inger Lise N. Bråte a, Merete Schøyen a 5 a Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadalléen 21, NO-0349 Oslo, Norway 6 b University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway 7 *Corresponding author: Norwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Gaustadallèen 21, NO-0349 OSLO, 8 Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Gayanazoo 76(2) 2012.Indd
    Gayana 76(2): 167-172, 2012. Comunicación breve ISSN 0717-652X Erroneous identifi cation of the mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck 1819) as the specie, Mytilus chilensis (Hupe 1854) in the Bay of Concepcion, Chile Identifi cación errónea del mejillón, Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck 1819) como la especie, Mytilus chilensis (Hupe 1854) en la Bahía de Concepción, Chile EDUARDO TARIFEÑO1*, RICARDO GALLEGUILLOS2, ALEJANDRA LLANOS-RIVERA3, DANIEL A RRIAGADA1, SANDRA FERRADA2,4, CRISTIAN B. CANALES-AGUIRRE2,4 AND MARITZA SEGUEL2 1Grupo I&D ProMytilus-UdeC, Departamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanografía. Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile. 2Laboratorio de Genética y Acuicultura, Departamento de Oceanografía Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanografía. Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile. 3Unidad de Biotecnología Marina y Acuicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanografía. Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile. 4Programa de Doctorado en Sistemática y Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Oceanografía. Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile. *E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT This communication informs that presence of the Chilean mussel, Mytilus chilensis (Hupe 1854) in the coast of the Bay of Concepcion (Chile) reported in the scientifi c literature is an erroneous identifi cation, being Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck 1819) the right species. RESUMEN Esta comunicación informa que la presencia de Mytilus chilensis (Hupe 1854) citada en la literatura científi ca para la costa de la Bahía de Concepción (Chile) no es correcta, siendo Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck 1819) la identifi cación taxonómica válida. The increasing interest to carry out mussel farming in the to the mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lamarck 1819) coasts of the Gulf of Arauco and Bay of Concepcion (Central with local name of “choro araucano” in Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Histopathological Survey of the Mussel Mytilus Chilensis
    Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research E-ISSN: 0718-560X [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Chile Cremonte, Florencia; Puebla, Claudia; Tillería, Jorge; Videla, Viviana Histopathological survey of the mussel Mytilus chilensis (Mytilidae) and the clam Gari solida (Psammobiidae) from southern Chile Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, vol. 43, núm. 1, 2015, pp. 248-254 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Valparaíso, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=175036979021 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 43(1): 248-254, 2015Histopathological survey of Mytilus chilensis and Gari solida 248 1 DOI: 10.3856/vol43-issue1-fulltext-21 Short Communication Histopathological survey of the mussel Mytilus chilensis (Mytilidae) and the clam Gari solida (Psammobiidae) from southern Chile Florencia Cremonte1, Claudia Puebla2, Jorge Tillería3 &Viviana Videla3 1Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET) Boulevard Brown 2915, U9120ACF Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina 2Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Arturo Prat, Ejército 443, Puerto Montt, Chile 3Fundación Chinquihue, Camino a Chinquihue Km 12, Puerto Montt, Chile Corresponding author: Florencia Cremonte ([email protected])
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Approaches to Delimit Genetic Lineages of the Mytilus Complex of South America: How Many Species Are There?
    Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1–12, 2015. PHYLOGENETIC APPROACHES TO DELIMIT GENETIC LINEAGES OF THE MYTILUS COMPLEX OF SOUTH AMERICA: HOW MANY SPECIES ARE THERE? MARCELA P. ASTORGA,1* LEYLA CARDENAS2 AND JAIME VARGAS1 1Instituto de Acuicultura, Universidad Austral de Chile, P.O. 1327, Puerto Mont, Chile; 2Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile ABSTRACT The aim of the present work is to increase the general knowledge about an economically important mussel species in Chile. Species of Mytilus are present in the southern cone of South America; however, there is still some controversy about species identification of samples from this area. The study herein presented attempts to: (1) corroborate the phylogenetic hypothesis defined for the Mytilus edulis species complex including taxa from a worldwide distribution; (2) evaluate the possible presence of the species Mytilus trossulus along the Chilean coast and determine if M. trossulus hybridizes with the local species; and (3) provide detailed data collected along the Chilean coast to help define the taxonomic status of Mytilus in South America. To this end, exhaustive sampling was conducted; Mytilus was collected from the Chilean coast and from the coasts of Argentina and Uruguay. Phylogenetic analysis and genetic divergence estimators were used to compare 426 Cytochrome oxidase I mitochondrial gene sequences and 190 16S RNA sequences of Mytilus species sampled from around the world. Following this, the time of divergence between northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere clades of Mytilus species was estimated. In addition, neither M. trossulus nor any associated hybrids were found along the Chilean coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in Sperm Ultrastructure Between Mytilus Chilensis and Mytilus Galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): Could Be Used As a Taxonomic Trait?
    Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 42(1): 172-179, 2014 Sperm ultrastructure in blue mussels 172 1 DOI: 103856/vol42-issue1-fulltext-14 Research Article Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait? Pablo A. Oyarzún1,2, Jorge E. Toro1, Orlando Garrido1, Carolina Briones3 & Ricardo Guiñez3 1Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas (ICML), Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Austral de Chile, Independencia 641, Valdivia, Chile 2Programa de Doctorado en Biología Marina, Universidad Austral de Chile Independencia 641, Valdivia, Chile 3Instituto de Ciencias Naturales "Alexander von Humboldt", Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Angamos 601, Antofagasta, Chile ABSTRACT. The sperm ultrastructure has been used to solve several systematic and phylogenetic problems in marine invertebrates. The sperm ultrastructure of the Chilean mussel Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis corresponds to the ect-aquasperm type. Sperm from both taxa measured 55-60 µm between head (acrosome + nucleus), midpiece (only 5 mitochondria) and the flagellum which in its end piece has a smaller diameter tail. The differences between both taxa are clearly shown, in the structure of the acrosome and nucleus. Therefore, according to our results and those reported in the literature, we indicate that Chilean native mussel sperm is different from other species of the Mytilus complex (M. trossulus, M. galloprovincialis and M. edulis). These differences in sperm ultrastructure found in M. chilensis, are another trait that can be used to validate the taxonomic status of the species. Differences in sperm morphology are related with reproductive isolation, and probably will be useful to understand future data on speciation.
    [Show full text]
  • Allozymic Variation and Differentiation in the Chilean Blue Mussel, Mytilus Chilensis, Along Its Natural Distribution
    Genetics and Molecular Biology, 29, 1, 174-179 (2006) Copyright by the Brazilian Society of Genetics. Printed in Brazil www.sbg.org.br Short Communication Allozymic variation and differentiation in the chilean blue mussel, Mytilus chilensis, along its natural distribution Jorge E. Toro, Grace C. Castro, Johana A. Ojeda and Ana M. Vergara Universidad Austral de Chile, Instituto de Biología Marina “Dr. Jürgen Winter”, Valdivia, Chile. Abstract Genetic differentiation in the Chilean blue mussel Mytilus chilensis (Hupé 1854) was investigated based on the varia- tion in the allozyme frequencies of Pgm, Gpi, Icd, Me, Gsr, Lap and Pep in eight samples collected along 1800 km from Arauco (VIII Region) to Punta Arenas (XII Region). Despite the large geographic separations, values of Neis un- biased genetic distance, D (0.004-0.048) and standardised genetic variation among populations, Fst (0.011-0.055) were small. The levels of gene flow (Nm = 8) found in this study prevent the effect of differentiation among popula- tions by genetic drift. This findings indicate that its long-lived planktotrophic larvae provides this species with consid- erable dispersal ability throughout its range which is favoured by the ocean currents along the chilean coast. In terms of management of the M. chilensis fishery, the results provide no evidence for discrete stocks, with the possible ex- ception of the Punta Arenas population. Considering the intensive aquaculture activities with this species the present study provide preliminary data which can be used as a baseline for further characterization and /or monitoring these mussel populations. Key words: allozyme, Mytilus chilensis, population genetics, gene flow, Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Challenge Test for the Blue Mussel, Mytilus Edulis
    Faculty of Bioscience Engineering Academic Period 2011 – 2012 Development of a Challenge Test for the Blue Mussel, Mytilus edulis Vyshal Delahaut Promotor: Dr. ir. Nancy Nevejan Tutor: Ph.D Mieke Eggermont Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the academic degree of Master of Science in Aquaculture Copyright The author and promotor give permission to put this thesis to disposal for consultation and to copy parts of it for personal use. Any other use falls under the limitations of copyright, in particular the obligation to explicitly mention the source when citing parts out of this thesis. Date: Nancy Nevejan Mieke Eggermont Vyshal Delahaut Acknowledgements In de eerste plaats wil ik mijn ouders bedanken. Ze hebben mij altijd gesteund tijdens mijn studies en me steeds geholpen als het nodig was. Then, I want to thank my promotor of this thesis, Nancy Nevejan for securing the supply of my test animals, sharing her knowledge about the topic and correcting my written report. I am also grateful to Mieke for guiding me through the experiments, and especially for her encouraging words and jokes when things were more complicated. I also want to thank Tom Defoird for his very good suggestions during the experiments. In addition, his help and advises regarding the PCRs was very instructive, and I did learn many valuable things from him. I am also thankful to Geert Vandewiele for his instructions about the PCR and related procedures, but also for his good company when I was working in the lab. I also want to thank Tom Baelemans for all the work he did for me during my experiments, but also for his jokes and the nice chats I had with him.
    [Show full text]
  • Histopathological Survey of the Mussel Mytilus Chilensis (Mytilidae) and the Clam Gari Solida (Psammobiidae) from Southern Chile
    Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 43(1): 248-254, 2015Histopathological survey of Mytilus chilensis and Gari solida 248 1 DOI: 10.3856/vol43-issue1-fulltext-21 Short Communication Histopathological survey of the mussel Mytilus chilensis (Mytilidae) and the clam Gari solida (Psammobiidae) from southern Chile Florencia Cremonte1, Claudia Puebla2, Jorge Tillería3 &Viviana Videla3 1Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET) Boulevard Brown 2915, U9120ACF Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina 2Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Arturo Prat, Ejército 443, Puerto Montt, Chile 3Fundación Chinquihue, Camino a Chinquihue Km 12, Puerto Montt, Chile Corresponding author: Florencia Cremonte ([email protected]) ABSTRACT. A total of 175 specimens of mussels, Mytilus chilensis (Mytilidae), and 56 specimens of clams, Gari solida (Psammobiidae), were collected in natural beds and culture sites of southern Chile. Juvenile mussel specimens (3 cm of maximum length) were free of parasites and diseases, whilst the commercial sized populations was parasitized by intracellular inclusions of bacteria-like organisms in the digestive gland epithelium and in the gills, by ciliates in the gills, turbellarians similar to Paravortex (Rhabocoela) in the intestine lumen and copepods attached to the gills. In addition, the disseminated neoplasia disease was also present although in low prevalences. In the clam, G. solida, prokariotic inclusions were found in the digestive gland epithelium and bacteria-like organisms in the gills, often encapsulated by haemocytes; oocysts containing up to 8 sporozoites similar to Nematopsis (Apicomplexa) in the connective tissue, causing haemocytic infiltration when the intensity of infection was high; ciliates belonging to two different species (one of them similar to Trichodina) inhabiting the gills; and a turbellarian similar to Paravortex in the lumen of digestive system without apparent host reaction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newsletter of the IUCN/SSC Mollusc Specialist Group Species Survival Commission • IUCN - the World Conservation Union
    ISSN 0958-5079 Tentacle No. 12—January 2004 The Newsletter of the IUCN/SSC Mollusc Specialist Group Species Survival Commission • IUCN - The World Conservation Union TENTACLE UNITAS MALACOLOGICA Editorial With but days to go before the deadline, I thought this was going to be a very thin issue of Tentacle. Then my e-mail filled up with contributions; and what a diverse variety of mollusks (alien species, slug control). Many issues are linked contributions! Tentacle started out (in 1989) with a distinct to the threats faced by mollusks and there is no good reason to focus on Partulid tree snails—and the same illustration of one exclude them from a newsletter such as this. So I encourage still adorns the first page of this issue as it did that first issue. anyone with anything relevant to mollusc conservation, even That first issue also included articles on other Pacific island in a broad sense, to send me an article, however short. snails, on freshwater bivalves, and on marine mollusks. Tentacle continues to include sections on all these groups, but Don’t wait until I put out a request for new material (usually has expanded to include news of all kinds of mollusks and via the MOLLUSCA listserver). Send me something now, and from almost every corner of the world—in this issue, from six continents! In this issue: Mollusks, especially land and freshwater mollusks, are one of IUCN and SSC News the most threatened groups of organisms on earth—look out Internet resources: lists and websites for a forthcoming article in BioScience authored by Chuck Meetings 2004-2005 Lydeard and a number of IUCN Mollusc Specialist Group News: Black carp escapes to the wild, Flying snails and the members—yet they remain in dire need of increased Xerces Society, New Conchological Society publication, New conservation effort, which of course means increased mollusk systematics book, Golden apple snail CD-ROM allocation of funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Differences in Sperm Ultrastructure Between Mytilus
    Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research E-ISSN: 0718-560X [email protected] Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Chile Oyarzún, Pablo A.; Toro, Jorge E.; Garrido, Orlando; Briones, Carolina; Guiñez, Ricardo Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait? Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, vol. 42, núm. 1, marzo, 2014, pp. 172-179 Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso Valparaiso, Chile Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=175030002014 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res., 42(1): 172-179, 2014 Sperm ultrastructure in blue mussels 172 1 DOI: 103856/vol42-issue1-fulltext-14 Research Article Differences in sperm ultrastructure between Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mytilidae): could be used as a taxonomic trait? Pablo A. Oyarzún1,2, Jorge E. Toro1, Orlando Garrido1, Carolina Briones3 & Ricardo Guiñez3 1Instituto de Ciencias Marinas y Limnológicas (ICML), Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Austral de Chile, Independencia 641, Valdivia, Chile 2Programa de Doctorado en Biología Marina, Universidad Austral de Chile Independencia 641, Valdivia, Chile 3Instituto de Ciencias Naturales "Alexander von Humboldt", Facultad de Ciencias del Mar y de Recursos Biológicos, Universidad de Antofagasta, Angamos 601, Antofagasta, Chile ABSTRACT. The sperm ultrastructure has been used to solve several systematic and phylogenetic problems in marine invertebrates. The sperm ultrastructure of the Chilean mussel Mytilus chilensis and Mytilus galloprovincialis corresponds to the ect-aquasperm type.
    [Show full text]
  • Maintenance, Survival and Behaviour of Green Mussel Mytilus
    www.ijapbc.com IJAPBC – Vol. 6(1), Jan - Mar, 2017 ISSN: 2277 - 4688 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN PHARMACY, BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY Research Article Maintenance, survival and behaviour of Green mussel Mytilus viridis - A Rare mollusk of Gujarat coast in laboratory conditions M. R. Patel1, M. B. Patel2 and K. A. Pithawala2.* 1Department of Chemistry, Gujarat Arts and Science College, Ellis bridge, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India - 380006. 2Department of Biology, Gujarat Arts and Science College, Ellis bridge, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India - 380006. ABSTRACT Dwarka (22°25’N, 69°04’E) and Mocha (21°20’N, 69°53’E) situated on the coast of Gujarat are two spots where green mussel Mytilus viridis is located. This is a rare mollusk as only few splattered colonies are seen. The colony of Mytilus located at Dwarka is very old and consists of very adult animals more than 10-20 years. Also these are located upstream in the mouth of river Gomti. The bed is rocky as well as muddy and estuarine type, whereas the mocha spot is rocky, sandy and purely marine. The animals are located at distance of 10-50 meters from the lowest tide mark. The animals are of different age and size distribution ranging from spat of 1cm size to 10cm largest specimen. Since Dwarka and Mocha are different locations and ecology of both spots being different the animals belonging to same species do differ. But these animals can be maintained under laboratory conditions together as well as separately without showing much difference in their behavior. The animals could survive under laboratory condition for more than 5 months.
    [Show full text]