World Journals and Law Reviews a Wealth of Legal Knowledge
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Publications for Gregory Tolhurst 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Publications for Gregory Tolhurst 2019 High Court of Australia. Journal of Contract Law, 32(3), 203- Pearson, G., Peden, E., Tolhurst, G., Paterson, J., McCracken, 230. S., McNaughton, A., Catterwell, R., Silink, A. (2019). Atkinson, S., Tolhurst, G., Hossain, L. (2015). The Dichotomy Commercial Law: Commentary & Materials - 4th Edition. of Decision Sciences in Information Assurance, Privacy, and Sydney: Thomson Lawbook Co. (Thomson Reuters). Security Applications in Law and Joint Ventures. International 2018 Journal on Advances in Security, 8(3&4), 141-152. <a href="http://www.iariajournals.org/security/sec_v8_n34_2015_p Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2018). Two models for aged.pdf">[More Information]</a> discharge of a contract by repudiation. Cambridge Law Journal, Carter, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). The Modern Meaning of Joint 77(1), 97-123. <a Venture Terms. In Tony Damian, J.W. Carter (Eds.), Before href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000836">[More You Tie the Knot: Commercial issues in joint venture law, (pp. Information]</a> 75-122). Australia: Ross Parsons Centre of Commercial, 2017 Corporate and Taxation Law. Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2017). An Assimilated McCracken, S., Stumbles, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). Title Transfer Approach to Discharge for Breach of Contract by Delay. Collateral Arrangements under the Personal Property Securities Cambridge Law Journal, 76(1), 63-86. <a Act 2009 (Cth): Paper I Setting the Scene. Journal of Contract href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197316000830">[More Law, 33(1), 1-19. Information]</a> McCracken, S., Stumbles, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). Title Transfer Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2017). Assessment of Collateral Arrangements under the Personal Property Securities Contractual Penalties: Dunlop Deflated. -
Critical Examination of Alternative Dispute Resolution
International Journal of Research and Review Vol.7; Issue: 11; November 2020 Website: www.ijrrjournal.com Review Paper E-ISSN: 2349-9788; P-ISSN: 2454-2237 Critical Examination of Alternative Dispute Resolution Isaac Olaitan Okeya Management Consultant Liverpool UK, Former Dean Faculty of Management Sciences, College of Technology, Esa Oke, Nigeria and Former Controller Owena Bank Plc. Nigeria. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION It has been observed from survey This research work will centre on, among report that most people desire from our many other things, matters which broadly modern justice system, is to avoid going to affect “Alternative Dispute Resolution.” trial. Most problems associated with Alternative disputes resolution, is popularly litigation include illiteracy of the law and known to be called ADR, has been noted to have embraced different methods of resolving the legal system due to its complicated different disputes, although it is commonly language and quaint procedures, and the ill viewed as a form of assisted negotiations with a faith in the court‟s fairness or its efficiency 2 central objective of dispute resolution: as a means of resolving disputes. Also, this alternative to traditional processes used by the is associated with factors such as high costs, law. Therefore, ADR is more of a consensual the endless delays, the tottering heaps of process, that is, it requires consent from the papers which take over their lives; therefore, parties involved, and its outcome are non- litigants seem to prefer a simpler approach: binding, so as such the dispute might not have a process conducted in plain language, been resolved. based on common sense, and geared to Prior to the development of Alternative dispute getting problems sorted out around a table resolution, disputes are often resolved by courts through litigation process, and in most times, rather in the hot atmosphere of the court room.3 justice is not served. -
Law Journals: Submissions and Ranking Feedback to Stephanie Miller Explanation Ranking Methodology Combined Score Impact- Factor Currency-Factor
Law Journals: Submissions and Ranking Feedback to Stephanie Miller Explanation Ranking methodology Combined score Impact- factor Currency-factor All Subjects For Editorial R Co CaC Information I Jn C an mb se os A Select left, then All Countries F ls F English non- k . s t English 20 Multi Sep B 11 Jnl-name words arate then General Specialized older surveys C Check create Student-edited Peer-edited Refereed spreadsheet To submit Print Online-only articles to law journals Ranked Non-ranked Submit clear Submit via Rank (e.g. 15,17-25) LexOpus 0.33 ImpF-Weight (0..1) Combi Rank Journal ned 04- 11 1 Harvard Law Review 100 2 Columbia Law Review 85.8 3 The Yale Law Journal 80.3 4 Stanford Law Review 79.3 5 Michigan Law Review 69.5 6 California Law Review 67.2 7 University of Pennsylvania Law 66.6 Review 8 Texas Law Review 66.2 9 Virginia Law Review 65.6 10 Minnesota Law Review 63.9 11 UCLA Law Review 63.4 12 The Georgetown Law Journal 62.8 13 New York University Law 62.7 Review 14 Cornell Law Review 59.8 15 Northwestern University Law 59.7 Review 16 Fordham Law Review 59.5 17 Notre Dame Law Review 56.1 18 Vanderbilt Law Review 51.6 18 William and Mary Law Review 51.6 20 The University of Chicago Law 48.9 Review 21 Iowa Law Review 48.4 22 Boston University Law Review 47.2 23 Duke Law Journal 46.3 24 North Carolina Law Review 41 25 Emory Law Journal 40.7 26 Southern California Law 40.2 Review 27 Cardozo Law Review 39.6 28 Boston College Law Review 38.1 28 The George Washington Law 38.1 Review 30 UC Davis Law Review 36.9 31 Hastings Law Journal -
Construction Contract Policy: Do We Mean What We Say?
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Central Archive at the University of Reading R E S E A R C H P A P E R S July 2002 Volume 4, Number 12 Construction contract policy: do we mean what we say? Will Hughes University of Reading, UK Yasuyoshi Maeda Penta Ocean Construction, Tokyo, Japan © RICS Foundation Aims and scope of The RICS Foundation Mike Hoxley Anglia Polytechnic University July 2002 the RICS Foundation Research Paper Electronic Reference PS0412 Research Paper Series David Lewis Harper Adams University Series College Published by Editor Colin Lizieri RICS Foundation The aim of the RICS Dr Les Ruddock University of Reading 12 Great George Street Foundation Paper series is to School of Construction & Jorge Lopes London SW1P 3AD, UK provide an outlet for the Property Management Instituto Politecnico de results of research and University of Salford Broganca The views expressed by the development in any area Salford John MacFarlane author(s) are not necessarily relevant to the surveying Lancs M5 4WT University of Western Sydney those of the RICS Foundation. profession. Papers range from United Kingdom David Mackmin Neither the author(s), the fundamental research work Sheffield Hallam University RICS Foundation nor the through to innovative Tel: +44 (0)161 295 4208 Nick Millard publisher accept any liability practical applications of new Fax: +44 (0)161 295 5011 Bruton Knowles for any action arising from the and interesting ideas. Papers Email: l. r u d d o c k @ s a l f o r d . a c . -
FALL 2009 Vented the Idea of Democracy
TULANEUNIVERSITYLAWSCHOOL TULANE VOL. 27–NO. 2 LAWYER F A L L 2 0 0 9 TAKING THE LAW THISISSUE IN THEI RHANDS ALETTERFROMINTERIM DEANSTEPHENGRIFFIN TULANELAWSTUDENTS I CLASSICALATHENIAN ANCESTRYOFAMERICAN ACTINTHEPUBLICINTEREST FREEDOMOFSPEECH I HONORROLLOFDONORS STEPHENGRIFFIN INTERIMDEAN LAURENVERGONA EDITORANDEXECUTIVEASSISTANTTOTHEINTERIMDEAN ELLENJ.BRIERRE DIRECTOROFALUMNIAFFAIRS TA NA C O M A N ARTDIRECTIONANDDESIGN SHARONFREEMAN DESIGNANDPRODUCTION CONTRIBUTORS LINDSAY ELLIS KATHRYN HOBGOOD NICKMARINELLO M A RY M O U TO N TULANELAWSCHOOLHONORROLLOFDONORS N E W WAV E S TA F F Donor lists originate from the Tulane University Office of Development. HOLMESRACKLEFF Lists are cataloged in compliance with the Tulane University Style Guide, using a standard format which reflects name preferences defined in the RYA N R I V E T university-wide donor database, unless a particular donation requires FRANSIMON specific donors’ preferences. TULANEDEVELOPMENT TULANE LAW CLINIC CONTRIBUTORS LIZBETHTURNER NICOLEDEPIETRO BRADVOGEL MICHAELHARRINGTON KEITHWERHAN ANDREWROMERO TULANELAWYER is published by the PHOTOGRAPHY Tulane Law School and is sent to the school’s JIM BLANCHARD, illustration, pages 3, 49, 63; CLAUDIA L. BULLARD, page alumni, faculty, staff and friends. 39; PAULA BURCH-CELENTANO/Tulane University Publications, inside cover, pages 2, 8, 12, 32, 48, 50, 53, 62; FEDERAL LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CENTER COMMITTEE, page 42; GLOBAL ENERGY GROUP LTD., page 10; JACKSON HILL, Tulane University is an Affirmative Action/Equal pages 24–25; BÍCH LIÊN, page 40 bottom;THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR Employment Opportunity institution. RESEARCH ON WOMEN, page 38; TRACIEMORRISSCHAEFER/Tulane University Publications, pages 44–45, 57; ANDREWSEIDEL, page 11; SINGAPORE PRESS HOLDINGS LTD., page 40 top; TULANE PUBLIC RELATIONS, page 47, outer back cover;EUGENIAUHL, pages 1, 26–28, 31, 33;TOM VARISCO, page 51; LAUREN VERGONA, pages 6, 7, 45–46; WALEWSKA M. -
Implementation of Adr Techniques in Public
International Journal of Science, Environment ISSN 2278-3687 (O) and Technology, Vol. 6, No 5, 2017, 3121 – 3131 2277-663X (P) IMPLEMENTATION OF ADR TECHNIQUES IN PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN NIGERIA Falilat Olubunmi Idowu1 and Anthony Akinlola Hungbo2 1Quantity Surveying Department, Yaba College of Technology, Lagos, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected] (*Corresponding Author) Abstract: Disputes in the construction industry have been attributed to several factors and categorized in various ways by many researchers. Despite the considerable amount of knowledge accumulated by many researchers on dispute causation and management, disputes still continue to prevail in the construction industry and cause disharmony in the construction process with significant costs. This study aims at assessing the implementation of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) techniques in the Nigerian public construction projects. An extensive literature review and questionnaire survey was carried out in order to achieve the aim of the study. The causes of disputes on public construction projects were identified and the ADR techniques that are effective in resolving disputes on public construction projects were also examined. The study found variation to the scope of work as the leading cause of disputes and adjudication as the ADR technique that brings about a final resolution of disputes on public construction projects. It was also revealed that public clients do not define the scope of work adequately before embarking on construction projects. However, the study recommends that adequate attention be given to clients’ requirements so as to define the scope of work accurately before embarking on public construction projects. Keywords: ADR, construction industry, dispute resolution, public client. -
Volume 10 (2013) | ISSN 1932-1821 (Print) 1932-1996 (Online) DOI 10.5195/Taxreview.2013.18 |
Volume 10 (2013) | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2013.18 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program, and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. PITTSBURGH TAX REVIEW Volume 10 Spring 2013 Issue 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLES WHEN ARE DAMAGES TAX FREE?: THE ELUSIVE MEANING OF “PHYSICAL INJURY” Ronald H. Jensen ................................................................... 87 ENTRY-LEVEL ENTREPRENEURS AND THE CHOICE-OF-ENTITY CHALLENGE Emily Ann Satterthwaite ...................................................... 139 NOTE AVOIDING DELEGATION DOCTRINE CHALLENGES TO INTERNET SALES TAX LEGISLATION: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE MAIN STREET FAIRNESS ACT Michael J. Bouey ................................................................. 203 Pitt Tax Review | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2013.18 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu i PITTSBURGH TAX REVIEW Volume 10 Spring 2013 Issue 2 2012 – 2013 EDITORIAL BOARD Senior Editors Michael J. Bouey Editor-in-Chief James Flannery Mirit Eyal-Cohen Anthony C. Infanti Faculty Editor Chief Faculty Editor Faculty Editor Sarah Martin John W. Kettering Executive Editor Production Editor Saheli Chakrabarty Ryan P. Hinsey Jeremiah Vandermark Notes Editor Articles Editors Jennifer Saint-Preux Sarah J. Ratzkin Research Editor Bluebook Editor Managing Editors Ashley Hileman Brian Fraile Sam Pangas Max Slater Kelly Smith Associate Editors Becky Armady Sung Un Kim Sean M. O’Rourke Patrick Carew Frank Kimmel Emily Osgood Jamie L. Davis Sarah Knerr Ryan Perlson Katelyn M. -
NYCLA CONSTRUCTION LAW JOURNAL a Publication of the NYCLA Construction Law Committee Volume III, Issue II FALL 2013
NYCLA CONSTRUCTION LAW JOURNAL A publication of the NYCLA Construction Law Committee Volume III, Issue II FALL 2013 Letter From the Co-Chair I N S I D E “New York Stands Alone” ARTICLES Dear Colleagues, there are many things that are quintessential New York: Broadway; Bagels; the Statue of Liberty (sorry New Jersey); and, although you Top Ten Construction Contract Provisions To Be Negotiated With the probably don’t know this, I doubt you will be surprised Owner Pg. 2 By Frank A. Hess, Esq. and Richard S. Robinson, Esq. to hear that New York is also home to the only McDonald’s with three levels of seating. The Liability of An Owner, Contractor or Subcontractor Under Article However, it might surprise you to learn that New 3-A of the Lien Law May Last Long Than You Think Pg. 9 York is the only State in the Union with a so-called By Michael Silverstein, Esq. “scaffold law” which imposes strict liability on owners Frequently Asked Questions on Construction and Construction Law and contractors for gravity related injuries (in fact, the By Robert S. Peckar, Esq, and Michael S. Zicherman, Esq. Pg. 11 “scaffold law” is the only area of civil liability law in New York which does not contain a comparative Protection of Neighboring Property During Construction Pg. 15 negligence standard). New York has held this By Brian G. Lustbader, Esq. distinction since Illinois repealed its scaffold law in 1995. All other States which have historically enacted a When The Federal Government’s Hard-Line Claim Negotiations Are scaffold law had repealed their statutes by the 1940’s. -
Review of “The Law of Judicial Precedent.”
BOOK REVIEW CRAFTING PRECEDENT THE LAW OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT. By Bryan A. Garner et al. St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson Reuters. 2016. Pp. xxvi, 910. $49.95. Reviewed by Paul J. Watford, Richard C. Chen, and Marco Basile How does the law of judicial precedent work in practice? That is the question at the heart of The Law of Judicial Precedent, the first treatise on the subject in more than 100 years. The treatise sets aside more theoretical and familiar questions about whether and why earlier decisions (especially wrong ones) should bind courts in new cases.1 In- stead, it offers an exhaustive how-to guide for practicing lawyers and judges: how to identify relevant precedents, how to weigh them, and how to interpret them. In short, how to apply precedents to new cases. The treatise’s thirteen authors include representatives from several of the federal circuit courts, justices from two state supreme courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s newest member, Justice Neil Gorsuch.2 Their coauthor and the project’s fountainhead, Bryan Garner, is the editor of Black’s Law Dictionary and one of the country’s leading authorities on legal writing and reasoning.3 The treatise is not a compendium of chap- ters written separately by these authors and loosely tied to a common ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Associate Professor of Law, University of Maine School of Law; Law Clerk to the Honorable Paul J. Watford, 2012–2013. Law Clerk to the Honorable Paul J. Watford, 2016–2017. In many chambers, judges work closely with their law clerks to resolve cases and draft opinions. -
SAMPLE Content Directory
SAMPLE Nearly 1,300 Journals Content Directory Participating! http://heinonline.org Please Note: This is a list of ALL content available in our two main library modules through the HeinOnline interface. Due to the various subscription packages available, access to this content may vary. TABLE OF CONTENTS: Law Journal Library ..................................................................................................................................... pp. 1-25 Legal Classics Library................................................................................................................................. pp. 26-56 LAW JOURNAL LIBRARY VOLUMES YEARS Acta Juridica 1958-2003 1958-2003 Acta Universitatis Lucian Blaga 2001-2005 2001-2005 Adelaide Law Review 1-24 1960-2003 Administrative Law Journal of the American University† 1-10 1987-1996 Administrative Law Review (ABA) 1-57 1949-2005 Advocate: A Weekly Law Journal† 1-2 1888-1890 African Human Rights Law Journal 1-3 2001-2003 African Journal of Legal Studies 1 2004-2005 Air Force Law Review 1-58 1959-2006 Air Law Review † 1-12 1930-1941 Akron Law Review 1-38 1967-2005 Akron Tax Journal 1-21 1983-2006 Alabama Law Journal (Birmingham) † 1-5 1925-1930 Alabama Law Journal (Montgomery) † 1-4 1882-1885 Alabama Law Review *JUST UPDATED* 1-57 1948-2006 Alaska Law Review 1-22 1984-2005 Albany Law Environmental Outlook Journal 1-10 1995-2005 Albany Law Journal † 1-70 1870-1909 Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 1-15 1991-2005 Albany Law Review 1-69 1931-2006 Alberta Law Quarterly -
This Is a List of Journals That You Can Submit Articles to Through Expresso, Scholastica, Or Both Services
This is a list of journals that you can submit articles to through ExpressO, Scholastica, or both services. Our ExpressO account provides institutional access to the service and does not charge for each submission made. Our institutional account through Scholastica charges for each individual submission that is made. Therefore, you may not submit articles to a journal through Scholastica if that journal also accepts submissions through ExpressO. The use of Scholastica must be restricted to those journals that only accept submissions through that service. For your convenience, the journals that you may submit to using Scholastica are highlighted in yellow. ExpressO should be utilized to submit articles to the other journals listed. Journal ExpressO Scholastica ACTEC Law Journal X X Access to Justice Journal X Acta Iuridica Olomucensia (Palacky Univ. Czech Rep.) X Adelaide Law Review X X Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, & Research X Administrative Law Review (American University) X X Air Force Law Review X Akron Intellectual Property Journal X Akron Law Review X X Akron Tax Journal X Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review X Alabama Law Review X Alaska Law Review (Duke University) X X Albany Government Law Review X X Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology X Albany Law Review X X Albany Law Review, New York Appeals X American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review X American Business Law Journal X X American Criminal Law Review (Georgetown University) X X American Indian Law Journal X X American Indian -
Mediating Construction Disputes: an Evaluation of Existing Practice
KC Jacket.qxd:KKL mediation Jacket 5/2/10 12:09 Page 1 Much more has been written about the theory of Mediating Construction Disputes: mediation, and its proper place in the avoidance and resolution of disputes in construction, than about its actual use. Mediating Construction Disputes: An Evaluation of Existing Practice is the full report of research conducted in 2006-2008 by the Centre of Construction Law & Dispute Resolution at King's College London, collaborating with the Technology and Construction Court at three centres. It combines hard - and sometimes surprising - detail about its practice, from Centre of Construction questionnaires completed by those actually involved in TCC litigation, with a summary of the existing Law & Dispute Resolution knowledge about mediation in the common law world of Existing Practice An Evaluation and about its relation to other formal and informal methods of dealing with construction disputes. Mediating Construction Disputes: An Evaluation of Existing Practice Gould, King & Britton Nicholas Gould, Claire King & Philip Britton Centre of Construction Law & Dispute Resolution Mediating Construction Disputes: An Evaluation of Existing Practice It is not the facts which we can put our fingers on which concern us but the sum of those facts; it is not the data we want but the essence of the data. John Cheever, Journals, London, Vintage Books (2010) 163 Nicholas Gould, Claire King & Philip Britton ABOUT THE AUTHORS Nicholas Gould BSc LLM FRICS FCIArb MCIOB Nicholas is a partner at Fenwick Elliott LLP, the UK’s largest specialist construction and engineering solicitors. He advises on, drafts, negotiates and settles construction documents, and provides strategic contract and dispute avoidance advice.