DOCSLIB.ORG

World Journals and Law Reviews a Wealth of Legal Knowledge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
World Journals and Law Reviews a Wealth of Legal Knowledge WORLD JOURNALS AND LAW REVIEWS A WEALTH OF LEGAL KNOWLEDGE 0980211B World Journals.indd 1 28/02/2013 12:55 CUSTOMER SUPPORT Westlaw International is dedicated to helping you get the most out of your subscription. Our legally qualified customer support and account management teams are here to help. Whether it’s integrating Westlaw International into your organisation, providing demonstrations or full training, we have the people to deliver the solutions you need. And should you require technical help, subscription information or if you feel you would benefit from faster, more targeted searches, we provide help 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, simply call the relevant number listed below. Country Toll-Free Number Belgium 0800 79971 Denmark 00 800 09378529 France 00 800 09378529 Finland 800 09378529 Germany 00 800 09378529 Ireland 00 800 09378529 Israel 00 800 09378529 Italy 800 787705 Netherlands 0 800 0220347 Norway 00 800 09378529 Spain 00 800 09378529 Sweden 00 800 09378529 United Kingdom 00 44 207 449 1110* or 800 0028 2200 *This number is not toll free. If your country is not listed please visit: www.westlawinternational.com/contact.htm for your toll-free number, or alternatively email: [email protected] CONTINUALLY UPDATED 0980211B World Journals.indd 2 28/02/2013 12:55 INTUITIVE TECHNOLOGY Used in over 60 countries, Westlaw International is built on a vast global library of some of the world’s best legal, news and business information. Access content from providers such as Sweet & Maxwell, Sweet & Maxwell Asia, Ellis Publications, Carswell and Westlaw. Increase the speed and efficiency of research, so that you can dedicate more of your time to your clients. World Journals and Law Reviews is a multi-base subscription to a huge resource of journals and law reviews from numerous jurisdictions around the world. Featuring over 1000 leading international journals and law reviews from across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Africa and Canada plus US journals and law reviews, this subscription gives you access to a wealth of legal content. All content is conveniently indexed and summarised to save you time. ABOUT THIS GUIDE To help you navigate the service easily and find the information you need quickly, this guide details the content available in alphabetical order together with CONTINUALLY the identifier code. UPDATED 0980211B World Journals.indd 3 28/02/2013 12:55 WORLD JOURNALS AND LAW REVIEWS B continued BERKBLJ Berkeley Business Law Journal BERKJAA Berkeley Journal of African-American Law and Policy A BERKJCL Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law Sign On Database BERKJELL Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law ACTEC ACTEC Law Journal BERKJGLJ Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law, and Justice ADMLJAMU Administrative Law Journal of the American University BERKJIL Berkeley Journal of International Law ADVOC Advocate BERKLARLJ Berkeley La Raza Law Journal ADVOCTX Advocate (Texas) BERKTLJ Berkeley Technology Law Journal AFJICL African Journal of International and Comparative Law BEVHBAJ Beverly Hills Bar Association Journal AFLR Air Force Law Review BFELJ Buffalo Environmental Law Journal AFRPTR Reporter-Air Force JAG Journal BFHRLR Buffalo Human Rights Law Review AHTHL Annals of Health Law BFIPLJ Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal AHTHLAD Annals of Health Law Advance Directive BFJGLSP Buffalo Journal of Gender Law and Social Policy AIPLAQJ AIPLA Quarterly Journal BFLR Buffalo Law Review AJLS African Journal of Legal Studies BFPILJ Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal AK-JLR Alaska Journals and Law Reviews BJMEIL Berkeley Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Law AKLR Alaska Law Review BKNJCFCL Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial, and Commercial Law AKRONLR Akron Law Review BKNJIL Brooklyn Journal of International Law AKRONTJ Akron Tax Journal BKNLR Brooklyn Law Review AL-JLR Alabama Journals and Law Reviews BLACKS Black’s Law Dictionary ALBGLR Albany Government Law Review BLRLR Baylor Law Review ALBLEOJ Albany Law Environmental Outlook Journal BTR British Tax Review ALBLJST Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology BTREP Business Torts Reporter ALBLR Albany Law Review BUILJ Boston University International Law Journal ALCRCLLR Alabama Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review BUJSTL Boston University Journal of Science and Technology Law ALLAW Alabama Lawyer BULR Boston University Law Review ALLR Alabama Law Review BUPILJ Boston University Public Interest Law Journal AMARLR Ave Maria Law Review BUSLINTL Business Law International AMBKRIJ American Bankruptcy Institute Journal BUSPRAC Busy Practitioner AMBKRILR American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review BYUELJ Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal AMBKRLJ American Bankruptcy Law Journal BYUILMR Brigham Young University International Law and AMBLJ American Business Law Journal Management Review AMCRLR American Criminal Law Review BYUJPL BYU Journal of Public Law AMINDLR American Indian Law Review BYULR Brigham Young University Law Review AMJCL American Journal of Comparative Law C AMJCRL American Journal of Criminal Law Sign On Database AMJIL American Journal of International Law CA-JLR California Journals and Law Reviews AMJJUR American Journal of Jurisprudence CABKRJ California Bankruptcy Journal AMJLH American Journal of Legal History CALR California Law Review AMJLM American Journal of Law and Medicine CALRC California Law Review Circuit AMJTA American Journal of Trial Advocacy CAMLJ Cambridge Law Journal AMJTP American Journal of Tax Policy CAMPBLR Campbell Law Review AMRIARB American Review of International Arbitration CANJFL Canadian Journal of Family Law AMUBUSLBR Business Law Brief (American University) CANJLJUR Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence AMUILR American University International Law Review CANJLS Canadian Journal of Law and Society AMUJGSPL American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and the Law CANJLT Canadian Journal of Law and Technology AMULELF American University Labor and Employment Law Forum CAPDEFJ Capital Defense Journal AMULR American University Law Review CAPULR Capital University Law Review ANIMALL Animal Law CARCLR Carbon and Climate Law Review ANNSICL Annual Survey of International and Comparative Law CARLR California Regulatory Law Reporter APLPJ Asian Pacific Law and Policy Journal CATHULR Catholic University Law Review APPALJL Appalachian Journal of Law CATOSCTR Cato Supreme Court Review APPNRLJ Appalachian Natural Resources Law Journal CAWILJ California Western International Law Journal AR-JLR Arkansas Journals and Law Reviews CAWLR California Western Law Review ARLAW Arkansas Lawyer CBAR CBA Record ARLN Arkansas Law Notes CDZAELJ Cardozo Arts and Entertainment Law Journal ARLR Arkansas Law Review CDZJCR Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution ARMLAW Army Lawyer CDZJICL Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law ASAMLJ Asian American Law Journal CDZJLG Cardozo Journal of Law and Gender ASILPROC American Society of International Law Proceedings CDZLR Cardozo Law Review ASJWTO Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy CDZPLPEJ Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal ASPAMLJ Asian Pacific American Law Journal CHAMP Champion ASPATORE Aspatore CHAPLR Chapman Law Review ASPER Asper Review of International Business and Trade Law CHARLLR Charlotte Law Review ASPLBL Aspatore Line-by-Line CHARLR Charleston Law Review ATLAWUP Al Tamimi Law Update CHIJIL Chicago Journal of International Law AZ-JLR Arizona Journals and Law Reviews CHIKJICL Chicago-Kent Journal of International and Comparative Law AZATT Arizona Attorney CHIKJIP Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property AZJELP Arizona Journal of Environmental Policy CHIKLR Chicago-Kent Law Review AZJICL Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law CHILATLR Chicana/o-Latina/o Law Review AZLR Arizona Law Review CHINESEJIL Chinese Journal of International Law AZSLJ Arizona State Law Journal CHINYILA Chinese (Taiwan) Yearbook of International Law and Affairs B CITYL CITYLAW Sign On Database CITYLAND CityLand BARRYLR Barry Law Review CJAUCL Competition: The Journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition BBJ Boston Bar Journal Law Section of the State Bar of California BBMN Bench and Bar of Minnesota CJQ Civil Justice Quarterly BCEALR Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review CLEAR Canadian Legal Education Annual Review BCICLR Boston College International and Comparative Law Review CLFORUM Criminal Law Forum BCIPTF Boston College Intellectual Property and Technology Forum CLINICLR Clinical Law Review BCLR Boston College Law Review CLLPJ Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal BCLRESUP Boston College of Law Review E-Supplement CLMBLR Columbia Business Law Review BCTWLJ Boston Journal of Law and Social Justice CLMHRLR Columbia Human Rights Law Review CLMJAL Columbia Journal of Asian Law 0980211B World Journals.indd 4 28/02/2013 12:55 C continued DRAKELR Drake Law Review CLMJEEL Columbia Journal of East European Law D continued CLMJEL Columbia Journal of Environmental Law DREXLR Drexel Law Review CLMJEURL Columbia Journal of European Law DRJ Dispute Resolution Journal CLMJLA Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts DUKCLPPS Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy Sidebar CLMJLSP Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems DUKECLPP Duke Journal of Constitutional Law and Public Policy CLMJRL Columbia Journal of Race and Law DUKEJCIL Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law CLMJTL Columbia Journal of Transnational Law DUKEJGLP Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy CLMLR Columbia Law Review DUKELJ
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Publications for Gregory Tolhurst 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
    Publications for Gregory Tolhurst 2019 High Court of Australia. Journal of Contract Law, 32(3), 203- Pearson, G., Peden, E., Tolhurst, G., Paterson, J., McCracken, 230. S., McNaughton, A., Catterwell, R., Silink, A. (2019). Atkinson, S., Tolhurst, G., Hossain, L. (2015). The Dichotomy Commercial Law: Commentary & Materials - 4th Edition. of Decision Sciences in Information Assurance, Privacy, and Sydney: Thomson Lawbook Co. (Thomson Reuters). Security Applications in Law and Joint Ventures. International 2018 Journal on Advances in Security, 8(3&4), 141-152. <a href="http://www.iariajournals.org/security/sec_v8_n34_2015_p Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2018). Two models for aged.pdf">[More Information]</a> discharge of a contract by repudiation. Cambridge Law Journal, Carter, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). The Modern Meaning of Joint 77(1), 97-123. <a Venture Terms. In Tony Damian, J.W. Carter (Eds.), Before href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197317000836">[More You Tie the Knot: Commercial issues in joint venture law, (pp. Information]</a> 75-122). Australia: Ross Parsons Centre of Commercial, 2017 Corporate and Taxation Law. Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2017). An Assimilated McCracken, S., Stumbles, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). Title Transfer Approach to Discharge for Breach of Contract by Delay. Collateral Arrangements under the Personal Property Securities Cambridge Law Journal, 76(1), 63-86. <a Act 2009 (Cth): Paper I Setting the Scene. Journal of Contract href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197316000830">[More Law, 33(1), 1-19. Information]</a> McCracken, S., Stumbles, J., Tolhurst, G. (2015). Title Transfer Carter, J., Courtney, W., Tolhurst, G. (2017). Assessment of Collateral Arrangements under the Personal Property Securities Contractual Penalties: Dunlop Deflated.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Examination of Alternative Dispute Resolution
    International Journal of Research and Review Vol.7; Issue: 11; November 2020 Website: www.ijrrjournal.com Review Paper E-ISSN: 2349-9788; P-ISSN: 2454-2237 Critical Examination of Alternative Dispute Resolution Isaac Olaitan Okeya Management Consultant Liverpool UK, Former Dean Faculty of Management Sciences, College of Technology, Esa Oke, Nigeria and Former Controller Owena Bank Plc. Nigeria. ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION It has been observed from survey This research work will centre on, among report that most people desire from our many other things, matters which broadly modern justice system, is to avoid going to affect “Alternative Dispute Resolution.” trial. Most problems associated with Alternative disputes resolution, is popularly litigation include illiteracy of the law and known to be called ADR, has been noted to have embraced different methods of resolving the legal system due to its complicated different disputes, although it is commonly language and quaint procedures, and the ill viewed as a form of assisted negotiations with a faith in the court‟s fairness or its efficiency 2 central objective of dispute resolution: as a means of resolving disputes. Also, this alternative to traditional processes used by the is associated with factors such as high costs, law. Therefore, ADR is more of a consensual the endless delays, the tottering heaps of process, that is, it requires consent from the papers which take over their lives; therefore, parties involved, and its outcome are non- litigants seem to prefer a simpler approach: binding, so as such the dispute might not have a process conducted in plain language, been resolved. based on common sense, and geared to Prior to the development of Alternative dispute getting problems sorted out around a table resolution, disputes are often resolved by courts through litigation process, and in most times, rather in the hot atmosphere of the court room.3 justice is not served.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Journals: Submissions and Ranking Feedback to Stephanie Miller Explanation Ranking Methodology Combined Score Impact- Factor Currency-Factor
    Law Journals: Submissions and Ranking Feedback to Stephanie Miller Explanation Ranking methodology Combined score Impact- factor Currency-factor All Subjects For Editorial R Co CaC Information I Jn C an mb se os A Select left, then All Countries F ls F English non- k . s t English 20 Multi Sep B 11 Jnl-name words arate then General Specialized older surveys C Check create Student-edited Peer-edited Refereed spreadsheet To submit Print Online-only articles to law journals Ranked Non-ranked Submit clear Submit via Rank (e.g. 15,17-25) LexOpus 0.33 ImpF-Weight (0..1) Combi Rank Journal ned 04- 11 1 Harvard Law Review 100 2 Columbia Law Review 85.8 3 The Yale Law Journal 80.3 4 Stanford Law Review 79.3 5 Michigan Law Review 69.5 6 California Law Review 67.2 7 University of Pennsylvania Law 66.6 Review 8 Texas Law Review 66.2 9 Virginia Law Review 65.6 10 Minnesota Law Review 63.9 11 UCLA Law Review 63.4 12 The Georgetown Law Journal 62.8 13 New York University Law 62.7 Review 14 Cornell Law Review 59.8 15 Northwestern University Law 59.7 Review 16 Fordham Law Review 59.5 17 Notre Dame Law Review 56.1 18 Vanderbilt Law Review 51.6 18 William and Mary Law Review 51.6 20 The University of Chicago Law 48.9 Review 21 Iowa Law Review 48.4 22 Boston University Law Review 47.2 23 Duke Law Journal 46.3 24 North Carolina Law Review 41 25 Emory Law Journal 40.7 26 Southern California Law 40.2 Review 27 Cardozo Law Review 39.6 28 Boston College Law Review 38.1 28 The George Washington Law 38.1 Review 30 UC Davis Law Review 36.9 31 Hastings Law Journal
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Contract Policy: Do We Mean What We Say?
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Central Archive at the University of Reading R E S E A R C H P A P E R S July 2002 Volume 4, Number 12 Construction contract policy: do we mean what we say? Will Hughes University of Reading, UK Yasuyoshi Maeda Penta Ocean Construction, Tokyo, Japan © RICS Foundation Aims and scope of The RICS Foundation Mike Hoxley Anglia Polytechnic University July 2002 the RICS Foundation Research Paper Electronic Reference PS0412 Research Paper Series David Lewis Harper Adams University Series College Published by Editor Colin Lizieri RICS Foundation The aim of the RICS Dr Les Ruddock University of Reading 12 Great George Street Foundation Paper series is to School of Construction & Jorge Lopes London SW1P 3AD, UK provide an outlet for the Property Management Instituto Politecnico de results of research and University of Salford Broganca The views expressed by the development in any area Salford John MacFarlane author(s) are not necessarily relevant to the surveying Lancs M5 4WT University of Western Sydney those of the RICS Foundation. profession. Papers range from United Kingdom David Mackmin Neither the author(s), the fundamental research work Sheffield Hallam University RICS Foundation nor the through to innovative Tel: +44 (0)161 295 4208 Nick Millard publisher accept any liability practical applications of new Fax: +44 (0)161 295 5011 Bruton Knowles for any action arising from the and interesting ideas. Papers Email: l. r u d d o c k @ s a l f o r d . a c .
    [Show full text]
  • FALL 2009 Vented the Idea of Democracy
    TULANEUNIVERSITYLAWSCHOOL TULANE VOL. 27–NO. 2 LAWYER F A L L 2 0 0 9 TAKING THE LAW THISISSUE IN THEI RHANDS ALETTERFROMINTERIM DEANSTEPHENGRIFFIN TULANELAWSTUDENTS I CLASSICALATHENIAN ANCESTRYOFAMERICAN ACTINTHEPUBLICINTEREST FREEDOMOFSPEECH I HONORROLLOFDONORS STEPHENGRIFFIN INTERIMDEAN LAURENVERGONA EDITORANDEXECUTIVEASSISTANTTOTHEINTERIMDEAN ELLENJ.BRIERRE DIRECTOROFALUMNIAFFAIRS TA NA C O M A N ARTDIRECTIONANDDESIGN SHARONFREEMAN DESIGNANDPRODUCTION CONTRIBUTORS LINDSAY ELLIS KATHRYN HOBGOOD NICKMARINELLO M A RY M O U TO N TULANELAWSCHOOLHONORROLLOFDONORS N E W WAV E S TA F F Donor lists originate from the Tulane University Office of Development. HOLMESRACKLEFF Lists are cataloged in compliance with the Tulane University Style Guide, using a standard format which reflects name preferences defined in the RYA N R I V E T university-wide donor database, unless a particular donation requires FRANSIMON specific donors’ preferences. TULANEDEVELOPMENT TULANE LAW CLINIC CONTRIBUTORS LIZBETHTURNER NICOLEDEPIETRO BRADVOGEL MICHAELHARRINGTON KEITHWERHAN ANDREWROMERO TULANELAWYER is published by the PHOTOGRAPHY Tulane Law School and is sent to the school’s JIM BLANCHARD, illustration, pages 3, 49, 63; CLAUDIA L. BULLARD, page alumni, faculty, staff and friends. 39; PAULA BURCH-CELENTANO/Tulane University Publications, inside cover, pages 2, 8, 12, 32, 48, 50, 53, 62; FEDERAL LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CENTER COMMITTEE, page 42; GLOBAL ENERGY GROUP LTD., page 10; JACKSON HILL, Tulane University is an Affirmative Action/Equal pages 24–25; BÍCH LIÊN, page 40 bottom;THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR Employment Opportunity institution. RESEARCH ON WOMEN, page 38; TRACIEMORRISSCHAEFER/Tulane University Publications, pages 44–45, 57; ANDREWSEIDEL, page 11; SINGAPORE PRESS HOLDINGS LTD., page 40 top; TULANE PUBLIC RELATIONS, page 47, outer back cover;EUGENIAUHL, pages 1, 26–28, 31, 33;TOM VARISCO, page 51; LAUREN VERGONA, pages 6, 7, 45–46; WALEWSKA M.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Adr Techniques in Public
    International Journal of Science, Environment ISSN 2278-3687 (O) and Technology, Vol. 6, No 5, 2017, 3121 – 3131 2277-663X (P) IMPLEMENTATION OF ADR TECHNIQUES IN PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN NIGERIA Falilat Olubunmi Idowu1 and Anthony Akinlola Hungbo2 1Quantity Surveying Department, Yaba College of Technology, Lagos, Nigeria E-mail: [email protected] (*Corresponding Author) Abstract: Disputes in the construction industry have been attributed to several factors and categorized in various ways by many researchers. Despite the considerable amount of knowledge accumulated by many researchers on dispute causation and management, disputes still continue to prevail in the construction industry and cause disharmony in the construction process with significant costs. This study aims at assessing the implementation of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) techniques in the Nigerian public construction projects. An extensive literature review and questionnaire survey was carried out in order to achieve the aim of the study. The causes of disputes on public construction projects were identified and the ADR techniques that are effective in resolving disputes on public construction projects were also examined. The study found variation to the scope of work as the leading cause of disputes and adjudication as the ADR technique that brings about a final resolution of disputes on public construction projects. It was also revealed that public clients do not define the scope of work adequately before embarking on construction projects. However, the study recommends that adequate attention be given to clients’ requirements so as to define the scope of work accurately before embarking on public construction projects. Keywords: ADR, construction industry, dispute resolution, public client.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 10 (2013) | ISSN 1932-1821 (Print) 1932-1996 (Online) DOI 10.5195/Taxreview.2013.18 |
    Volume 10 (2013) | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2013.18 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. This journal is published by the University Library System of the University of Pittsburgh as part of its D-Scribe Digital Publishing Program, and is cosponsored by the University of Pittsburgh Press. PITTSBURGH TAX REVIEW Volume 10 Spring 2013 Issue 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLES WHEN ARE DAMAGES TAX FREE?: THE ELUSIVE MEANING OF “PHYSICAL INJURY” Ronald H. Jensen ................................................................... 87 ENTRY-LEVEL ENTREPRENEURS AND THE CHOICE-OF-ENTITY CHALLENGE Emily Ann Satterthwaite ...................................................... 139 NOTE AVOIDING DELEGATION DOCTRINE CHALLENGES TO INTERNET SALES TAX LEGISLATION: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE MAIN STREET FAIRNESS ACT Michael J. Bouey ................................................................. 203 Pitt Tax Review | ISSN 1932-1821 (print) 1932-1996 (online) DOI 10.5195/taxreview.2013.18 | http://taxreview.law.pitt.edu i PITTSBURGH TAX REVIEW Volume 10 Spring 2013 Issue 2 2012 – 2013 EDITORIAL BOARD Senior Editors Michael J. Bouey Editor-in-Chief James Flannery Mirit Eyal-Cohen Anthony C. Infanti Faculty Editor Chief Faculty Editor Faculty Editor Sarah Martin John W. Kettering Executive Editor Production Editor Saheli Chakrabarty Ryan P. Hinsey Jeremiah Vandermark Notes Editor Articles Editors Jennifer Saint-Preux Sarah J. Ratzkin Research Editor Bluebook Editor Managing Editors Ashley Hileman Brian Fraile Sam Pangas Max Slater Kelly Smith Associate Editors Becky Armady Sung Un Kim Sean M. O’Rourke Patrick Carew Frank Kimmel Emily Osgood Jamie L. Davis Sarah Knerr Ryan Perlson Katelyn M.
    [Show full text]
  • NYCLA CONSTRUCTION LAW JOURNAL a Publication of the NYCLA Construction Law Committee Volume III, Issue II FALL 2013
    NYCLA CONSTRUCTION LAW JOURNAL A publication of the NYCLA Construction Law Committee Volume III, Issue II FALL 2013 Letter From the Co-Chair I N S I D E “New York Stands Alone” ARTICLES Dear Colleagues, there are many things that are quintessential New York: Broadway; Bagels; the Statue of Liberty (sorry New Jersey); and, although you Top Ten Construction Contract Provisions To Be Negotiated With the probably don’t know this, I doubt you will be surprised Owner Pg. 2 By Frank A. Hess, Esq. and Richard S. Robinson, Esq. to hear that New York is also home to the only McDonald’s with three levels of seating. The Liability of An Owner, Contractor or Subcontractor Under Article However, it might surprise you to learn that New 3-A of the Lien Law May Last Long Than You Think Pg. 9 York is the only State in the Union with a so-called By Michael Silverstein, Esq. “scaffold law” which imposes strict liability on owners Frequently Asked Questions on Construction and Construction Law and contractors for gravity related injuries (in fact, the By Robert S. Peckar, Esq, and Michael S. Zicherman, Esq. Pg. 11 “scaffold law” is the only area of civil liability law in New York which does not contain a comparative Protection of Neighboring Property During Construction Pg. 15 negligence standard). New York has held this By Brian G. Lustbader, Esq. distinction since Illinois repealed its scaffold law in 1995. All other States which have historically enacted a When The Federal Government’s Hard-Line Claim Negotiations Are scaffold law had repealed their statutes by the 1940’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of “The Law of Judicial Precedent.”
    BOOK REVIEW CRAFTING PRECEDENT THE LAW OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT. By Bryan A. Garner et al. St. Paul, Minn.: Thomson Reuters. 2016. Pp. xxvi, 910. $49.95. Reviewed by Paul J. Watford, Richard C. Chen, and Marco Basile How does the law of judicial precedent work in practice? That is the question at the heart of The Law of Judicial Precedent, the first treatise on the subject in more than 100 years. The treatise sets aside more theoretical and familiar questions about whether and why earlier decisions (especially wrong ones) should bind courts in new cases.1 In- stead, it offers an exhaustive how-to guide for practicing lawyers and judges: how to identify relevant precedents, how to weigh them, and how to interpret them. In short, how to apply precedents to new cases. The treatise’s thirteen authors include representatives from several of the federal circuit courts, justices from two state supreme courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court’s newest member, Justice Neil Gorsuch.2 Their coauthor and the project’s fountainhead, Bryan Garner, is the editor of Black’s Law Dictionary and one of the country’s leading authorities on legal writing and reasoning.3 The treatise is not a compendium of chap- ters written separately by these authors and loosely tied to a common ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Associate Professor of Law, University of Maine School of Law; Law Clerk to the Honorable Paul J. Watford, 2012–2013. Law Clerk to the Honorable Paul J. Watford, 2016–2017. In many chambers, judges work closely with their law clerks to resolve cases and draft opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • SAMPLE Content Directory
    SAMPLE Nearly 1,300 Journals Content Directory Participating! http://heinonline.org Please Note: This is a list of ALL content available in our two main library modules through the HeinOnline interface. Due to the various subscription packages available, access to this content may vary. TABLE OF CONTENTS: Law Journal Library ..................................................................................................................................... pp. 1-25 Legal Classics Library................................................................................................................................. pp. 26-56 LAW JOURNAL LIBRARY VOLUMES YEARS Acta Juridica 1958-2003 1958-2003 Acta Universitatis Lucian Blaga 2001-2005 2001-2005 Adelaide Law Review 1-24 1960-2003 Administrative Law Journal of the American University† 1-10 1987-1996 Administrative Law Review (ABA) 1-57 1949-2005 Advocate: A Weekly Law Journal† 1-2 1888-1890 African Human Rights Law Journal 1-3 2001-2003 African Journal of Legal Studies 1 2004-2005 Air Force Law Review 1-58 1959-2006 Air Law Review † 1-12 1930-1941 Akron Law Review 1-38 1967-2005 Akron Tax Journal 1-21 1983-2006 Alabama Law Journal (Birmingham) † 1-5 1925-1930 Alabama Law Journal (Montgomery) † 1-4 1882-1885 Alabama Law Review *JUST UPDATED* 1-57 1948-2006 Alaska Law Review 1-22 1984-2005 Albany Law Environmental Outlook Journal 1-10 1995-2005 Albany Law Journal † 1-70 1870-1909 Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology 1-15 1991-2005 Albany Law Review 1-69 1931-2006 Alberta Law Quarterly
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a List of Journals That You Can Submit Articles to Through Expresso, Scholastica, Or Both Services
    This is a list of journals that you can submit articles to through ExpressO, Scholastica, or both services. Our ExpressO account provides institutional access to the service and does not charge for each submission made. Our institutional account through Scholastica charges for each individual submission that is made. Therefore, you may not submit articles to a journal through Scholastica if that journal also accepts submissions through ExpressO. The use of Scholastica must be restricted to those journals that only accept submissions through that service. For your convenience, the journals that you may submit to using Scholastica are highlighted in yellow. ExpressO should be utilized to submit articles to the other journals listed. Journal ExpressO Scholastica ACTEC Law Journal X X Access to Justice Journal X Acta Iuridica Olomucensia (Palacky Univ. Czech Rep.) X Adelaide Law Review X X Administrative Issues Journal: Connecting Education, Practice, & Research X Administrative Law Review (American University) X X Air Force Law Review X Akron Intellectual Property Journal X Akron Law Review X X Akron Tax Journal X Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review X Alabama Law Review X Alaska Law Review (Duke University) X X Albany Government Law Review X X Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology X Albany Law Review X X Albany Law Review, New York Appeals X American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review X American Business Law Journal X X American Criminal Law Review (Georgetown University) X X American Indian Law Journal X X American Indian
    [Show full text]
  • Mediating Construction Disputes: an Evaluation of Existing Practice
    KC Jacket.qxd:KKL mediation Jacket 5/2/10 12:09 Page 1 Much more has been written about the theory of Mediating Construction Disputes: mediation, and its proper place in the avoidance and resolution of disputes in construction, than about its actual use. Mediating Construction Disputes: An Evaluation of Existing Practice is the full report of research conducted in 2006-2008 by the Centre of Construction Law & Dispute Resolution at King's College London, collaborating with the Technology and Construction Court at three centres. It combines hard - and sometimes surprising - detail about its practice, from Centre of Construction questionnaires completed by those actually involved in TCC litigation, with a summary of the existing Law & Dispute Resolution knowledge about mediation in the common law world of Existing Practice An Evaluation and about its relation to other formal and informal methods of dealing with construction disputes. Mediating Construction Disputes: An Evaluation of Existing Practice Gould, King & Britton Nicholas Gould, Claire King & Philip Britton Centre of Construction Law & Dispute Resolution Mediating Construction Disputes: An Evaluation of Existing Practice It is not the facts which we can put our fingers on which concern us but the sum of those facts; it is not the data we want but the essence of the data. John Cheever, Journals, London, Vintage Books (2010) 163 Nicholas Gould, Claire King & Philip Britton ABOUT THE AUTHORS Nicholas Gould BSc LLM FRICS FCIArb MCIOB Nicholas is a partner at Fenwick Elliott LLP, the UK’s largest specialist construction and engineering solicitors. He advises on, drafts, negotiates and settles construction documents, and provides strategic contract and dispute avoidance advice.
    [Show full text]