DOCSLIB.ORG

SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 SR 16, Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3, Congestion Study FINAL December 28, 2018 Olympic Region Planning P. O. Box 47440 Olympia, WA 98504-7440 SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 This page intentionally left blank. SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 Washington State Department of Transportation Olympic Region Tumwater, Washington SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study Project Limits: SR 16 MP 8.0 to 29.1 SR 3 MP 30.4 to 38.9 SR 304 MP 0.0 to 1.6 December 2018 John Wynands, P.E. Regional Administrator Dennis Engel, P.E. Olympic Region Multimodal Planning Manager SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 This page intentionally left blank. SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 Title VI Notice to Public It is the Washington State Department of Transportation’s (WSDOT) policy to assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise discriminated against under any of its federally funded programs and activities. Any person who believes his/her Title VI protection has been violated, may file a complaint with WSDOT’s Office of Equal Opportunity (OEO). For additional information regarding Title VI complaint procedures and/or information regarding our non- discrimination obligations, please contact OEO’s Title VI Coordinator at (360) 705-7082. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information This material can be made available in an alternate format by emailing the Office of Equal Opportunity at [email protected] or by calling toll free, 855-362-4ADA (4232). Persons who are deaf or hard of hearing may make a request by calling the Washington State Relay at 711. Notificación de Titulo VI al Público Es la póliza de el Departamento de Transportes del Estado de Washington de asegurar que ninguna persona sea excluida de participación o sea negado los beneficios, o sea discriminado bajo cualquiera de sus programas y actividades financiado con fondos federales sobre la base de raza, color, origen nacional o sexo, como proveído por el Título VI de el Acto de Derechos Civiles de 1964. Cualquier persona que cree que sus protecciones de Titulo VI han sido violadas, puede hacer una queja con la Oficina de Igualdad de Oportunidades (OEO). Para información adicional con respecto a procedimientos de quejas de Titulo VI y/o información con respecto a nuestras obligaciones sin discriminación, por favor de comunicarse con el Coordinador de Titulo VI de la OEO (360) 705-7082. Información del Acta Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Este material es disponible en un formato alternativa. Envié su petición por correo electrónico al equipo de OEO en [email protected] o llamando gratis, 855- 362-4ADA (4232). Personas sordas o con problemas de audición pueden solicitar llamando el relé de estado de Washington al 711. Notice to Public i SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 This page intentionally left blank. ii SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 This page intentionally left blank. iv SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................. ix Participating Agencies and Individuals ............................................................................. xi Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... xiii Study Approach ........................................................................................................ xiv Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Vision .................................................................................................... 2 Chapter 2 Public and Stakeholder Involvement/Outreach ........................................... 9 2.1 Public and Stakeholder Engagement Process .................................................. 9 2.2 Public Input ..................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 3 Transportation Performance Gap Summary .............................................. 13 3.1 Existing Mainline Transportation Facilities ...................................................... 16 3.2 Existing Traffic Forecasting Model .................................................................. 24 3.3 Existing Operating Conditions ......................................................................... 27 3.4 Future Traffic Forecasting Model .................................................................... 39 3.5 Future Operating Conditions ........................................................................... 41 Chapter 4 Strategy Package Development and Evaluation ....................................... 49 4.1 Approach to Development of Solutions and Strategy Packages ..................... 49 4.2 Initial Screening of Solutions ........................................................................... 50 4.3 Secondary Screening of Solutions .................................................................. 51 4.4 Evaluation of Strategy Packages .................................................................... 53 4.5 Refinement of Strategy Packages ................................................................... 54 4.6 Summary of Recommended Strategy Packages and Solutions ..................... 55 Chapter 5 Recommended Packages and Solutions ................................................... 59 5.1 Corridor Performance with Recommended Solutions ..................................... 59 5.2 Sub-Area Recommendations and Performance ............................................. 65 5.3 Recommended Solution Investment Summary ............................................... 78 5.4 Prioritization and Ranking of Solutions ........................................................... 79 Chapter 6 Conclusion and Next Steps ......................................................................... 83 Acronyms and Abbreviations v SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 6.1 Practical Solutions Next Steps Towards Implementation of Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 83 6.2 Moving Forward .............................................................................................. 84 Chapter 7 References .................................................................................................... 87 Appendices A Recommended Solutions by Sub-Area Table B Needs Statement Approach and Needs Statement, Technical Memorandum, Final, March 2017 C Study Focus Group Members D Summary of Community Engagement and Public Opinion Survey E Study Open House Summary and Materials F Traffic Analysis Methods and Assumptions, Technical Memorandum, Final, February 2017 G Data Collection Methods, Technical Memorandum, Final, December 2017 H Existing Traffic Operations Analysis, Technical Memorandum, Final, December 2017 I Traffic Forecasting Model Review and Implementation Plan, Technical Memorandum, Final, April 2017 J Travel Demand Forecasting, Technical Memorandum, Final, March 2018 K Future Baseline Traffic Operations Analysis, Technical Memorandum, Draft, May 2018 L Summary of Evaluation and Analysis Procedures, Technical Memorandum, Final, September 2018 M Evaluation of Strategy Packages, Technical Memorandum, Draft, June 2018 N Summary of Recommended Solutions, Technical Memorandum, Draft, November 2018 O Planning Level Cost Estimates for Recommended Solutions P Prioritization of Recommended Solutions, Technical Memorandum, Draft, October 2018 Tables Table 1-1. Study Goals, Performance Measures, and Metrics ................................................................. 4 Table 1-2. SR 16 TNB to SR 3, Congestion Study: Strategy Definitions .................................................. 7 Table 2-1. Executive Committee Meeting Dates and Topics .................................................................. 10 Table 2-2. Technical Advisory Group Meeting Dates and Topics ........................................................... 10 Table 3-1. Study Area Intersections........................................................................................................ 13 Table 3-2. Land Use Categories for SR 16 Visum Corridor Model ......................................................... 26 Table 3-3. Peak Direction Corridor Travel Times – Peak Hour ............................................................... 31 Table 3-4. Observed Crash Data Summary by Sub-area (2012-2016) .................................................. 38 Table 3-5. Existing and Future Travel Times .......................................................................................... 44 Table 4-1. Strategy Categories ............................................................................................................... 49 Table 4-2. Recommended Solutions by Sub-area .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2021 WSTC Tolling Report and Tacoma Narrows Bridge Loan Update
    2021 WSTC TOLLING REPORT & TACOMA NARROWS BRIDGE LOAN UPDATE January 2021 2021 WSTC TOLLING REPORT & TACOMA NARROWS BRIDGE LOAN UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 4 SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge 7 2020 Commission Action 7 2021 Anticipated Commission Action 7 SR 99 Tunnel 8 2020 Commission Action 8 2021 Anticipated Commission Action 8 SR 520 Bridge 9 2020 Commission Action 9 2021 Anticipated Commission Action 9 I-405 Express Toll Lanes & SR 167 HOT Lanes 10 2020 Commission Action 10 2021 Anticipated Commission Action 11 I-405 Express Toll Lanes & SR 167 HOT Lanes Low Income Tolling Program Study 11 Toll Policy & Planning 12 Toll Policy Consistency 12 Planning for Future Performance & Operations 12 Looking Forward To Future Tolled Facilities 13 2021 Tolling Recommendations 14 Summary of Current Toll Rates and Revenues by Facility 16 2021 Tacoma Narrows Bridge Loan Update 17 2019-21 Biennium Loan Estimates 17 2021-23 Biennium Loan Estimates 18 Comparison of Total Loan Estimates: FY 2019 – FY 2030 18 TNB Loan Repayment Estimates 19 2021 Loan Update: Details & Assumptions 20 Factors Contributing to Loan Estimate Analysis 20 Financial Model Assumptions 21 P age 3 2021 WSTC TOLLING REPORT & TACOMA NARROWS BRIDGE LOAN UPDATE INTRODUCTION As the State Tolling Authority, the Washington State Transportation Commission (Commission) sets toll rates and polices for all tolled facilities statewide, which currently include: the SR 520 Bridge, the SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge, the I-405 express toll lanes (ETLs), the SR 167 HOT lanes, and the SR 99 Tunnel.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Aesthetics in Suspension Bridges
    History and Aesthetics in Suspension Bridges 1 6-01 john a roebling_150dpi.jpg Today we trace the evolution of steel bridge design from its first American innovator, JA Roebling up through 1930’s New York In the 30’s in New York, despite hard economic times, many huge structures were erected 2 6-02 empire state building_150dpi.jpg The Empire State Building, tallest in the world About which more later 3 6-03 george washington bridge_150dpi.jpg The GW Bridge, longest suspension span by a factor of two, and 4 6-04 bayonne bridge_150dpi.jpg The Bayonne Bridge, longest arch span in the world, barely surpassing the Sydney Harbor Bridge 5 6-05 othmar ammann_150dpi.jpg These last two were both designed by Othmar H. Ammann, the greatest bridge artist to use steel as his material Ammann was born in Bern, graduated 1902 from ETH and 1904 to USA. Worked from 1912-23 for Lindenthal He would study under Karl Ritter protégé of Carl Cullmann The Swiss were uniquely able to mediate the scientific rigor of the germans with the design elegance of the French 6 6-06 hell gate and triborough bridges_150dpi.jpg The story of Ammann and the GWB begins with Gustav Lindenthal, the dean of American bridge engineers Ammann had cut his teeth as design assistant to Gustav Lindenthal at the Hellgate Bridge The last great bridge of the railroad bridges. From here on the great bridges would carry road traffic rather than trains Here we see two bridges, Hellgate and Triborough, on which Ammann would work, but not express his aesthetic vision 7 6-08 gustav lindenthal_150dpi.jpg Hellgate designer Lindnethal Born in Brunn in Austria, now Brno in the Czech Republic Designed a bridge at Pittsburgh, a lenticular truss to replace Roebling’s Smithfield St.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 -- Puget Sound, Washington
    514 Puget Sound, Washington Volume 7 WK50/2011 123° 122°30' 18428 SKAGIT BAY STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA S A R A T O 18423 G A D A M DUNGENESS BAY I P 18464 R A A L S T S Y A G Port Townsend I E N L E T 18443 SEQUIM BAY 18473 DISCOVERY BAY 48° 48° 18471 D Everett N U O S 18444 N O I S S E S S O P 18458 18446 Y 18477 A 18447 B B L O A B K A Seattle W E D W A S H I N ELLIOTT BAY G 18445 T O L Bremerton Port Orchard N A N 18450 A 18452 C 47° 47° 30' 18449 30' D O O E A H S 18476 T P 18474 A S S A G E T E L N 18453 I E S C COMMENCEMENT BAY A A C R R I N L E Shelton T Tacoma 18457 Puyallup BUDD INLET Olympia 47° 18456 47° General Index of Chart Coverage in Chapter 13 (see catalog for complete coverage) 123° 122°30' WK50/2011 Chapter 13 Puget Sound, Washington 515 Puget Sound, Washington (1) This chapter describes Puget Sound and its nu- (6) Other services offered by the Marine Exchange in- merous inlets, bays, and passages, and the waters of clude a daily newsletter about future marine traffic in Hood Canal, Lake Union, and Lake Washington. Also the Puget Sound area, communication services, and a discussed are the ports of Seattle, Tacoma, Everett, and variety of coordinative and statistical information.
    [Show full text]
  • 4. the Wedge Historic District
    THE WEDGE HISTORIC DISTRICT From the National Register Nomination Summary Paragraph Tacoma, Washington lies on the banks of Commencement Bay, where the Puyallup River flows into Puget Sound. The city is 30 miles south of Seattle, north of Interstate 5, and 30 miles north of the capital city, Olympia. To the west, a suspension bridge, the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, connects the city to the Kitsap peninsula. Through the community, a main railroad line runs south to California and north to Canada, with another line crossing the Cascades into eastern Washington. The Tacoma “Wedge Neighborhood,” named for its wedge shape, is located between 6th Ave and Division Ave. from South M Street to its tip at Sprague Avenue. The Wedge lies within Tacoma's Central Addition (1884), Ainsworth Addition (1889) and New Tacoma and shares a similar history to that of the North Slope Historic District, which is north of the Wedge Neighborhood across Division Avenue, and is listed on the Tacoma, Washington and National Registers of Historic Places. LOCATION AND SETTING The Wedge Neighborhood is bounded by Division Avenue to the north and 6th Avenue to the south, both arterials that serve to distinguish the Wedge from its surrounding neighborhoods. To the east is Martin Luther King Jr. Way, another arterial, just outside of the district. The district boundary is established by the thoroughly modern MultiCare Hospital campus to the East. The development of the hospital coincides with the borders of the underlying zoning, which is Hospital Medical, the borders of which run along a jagged path north and south from approximately Division to Sixth Ave, alternating between S M St and the alley between S M St and S L St.
    [Show full text]
  • National Film Registry Titles Listed by Release Date
    National Film Registry Titles 1989-2017: Listed by Year of Release Year Year Title Released Inducted Newark Athlete 1891 2010 Blacksmith Scene 1893 1995 Dickson Experimental Sound Film 1894-1895 2003 Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze 1894 2015 The Kiss 1896 1999 Rip Van Winkle 1896 1995 Corbett-Fitzsimmons Title Fight 1897 2012 Demolishing and Building Up the Star Theatre 1901 2002 President McKinley Inauguration Footage 1901 2000 The Great Train Robbery 1903 1990 Life of an American Fireman 1903 2016 Westinghouse Works 1904 1904 1998 Interior New York Subway, 14th Street to 42nd Street 1905 2017 Dream of a Rarebit Fiend 1906 2015 San Francisco Earthquake and Fire, April 18, 1906 1906 2005 A Trip Down Market Street 1906 2010 A Corner in Wheat 1909 1994 Lady Helen’s Escapade 1909 2004 Princess Nicotine; or, The Smoke Fairy 1909 2003 Jeffries-Johnson World’s Championship Boxing Contest 1910 2005 White Fawn’s Devotion 1910 2008 Little Nemo 1911 2009 The Cry of the Children 1912 2011 A Cure for Pokeritis 1912 2011 From the Manger to the Cross 1912 1998 The Land Beyond the Sunset 1912 2000 Musketeers of Pig Alley 1912 2016 Bert Williams Lime Kiln Club Field Day 1913 2014 The Evidence of the Film 1913 2001 Matrimony’s Speed Limit 1913 2003 Preservation of the Sign Language 1913 2010 Traffic in Souls 1913 2006 The Bargain 1914 2010 The Exploits of Elaine 1914 1994 Gertie The Dinosaur 1914 1991 In the Land of the Head Hunters 1914 1999 Mabel’s Blunder 1914 2009 1 National Film Registry Titles 1989-2017: Listed by Year of Release Year Year
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Places Continuation Sheet NOV """8 Ma \ \
    .------------ I I~;e NPS Form 10-900 4M~~rOO24~18 (OCt. 1990) RECIEIVED United Slates Department of the Interior National Park Service .. • NOV National Register of Historic Places ·8. Registration Form INTERAGENCY RESOURCES DIVISION This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties a d distrietMMOO~I',SfOWJlQS,mplete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Fonn (National Register Bulletin lGA). Co pleJ;e88Cb item bV marlcing "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter onfycateqories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10.,9OOa).Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name __ dT"'a"cc<,o"m!lla... N""'a"'r"'r-'Ol:!w>:;sLBQ.r"-"'i"dOjq"'e'- ------------------- other names/site number _ 2. Location street & number Spann ina the Tae oma Narrows o not for publication city or town Tacoma o vicinity state Wash; ngton code ~ county _-"PCJ.j.eecIr:cC.eec- code Jl5..3..- zip code _ 3. Slate/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the NationaJ Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this IX] nomination o request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • VKP Visitorguide-24X27-Side1.Pdf
    FREE FREE MAP Kitsap Peninsula MAP DESTINATIONS & ATTRACTIONS Visitors Guide INSIDE INSIDE Enjoy a variety of activities and attractions like a tour of the Suquamish Museum, located near the Chief Seattle grave site, that tell the story of local Native Americans Welcome and their contribution to the region’s history and culture. to the Kitsap Peninsula! The beautiful Kitsap Peninsula is located directly across Gardens, Galleries & Museums Naval & Military History Getting Around the Region from Seattle offering visitors easy access to the www.VisitKitsap.com/gardens & Memorials www.VisitKitsap.com/transportation Natural Side of Puget Sound. Hop aboard a famous www.VisitKitsap.com/arts-and-culture visitkitsap.com/military-historic-sites- www.VisitKitsap.com/plan-your-event www.VisitKitsap.com/international-visitors WA State Ferry or travel across the impressive Tacaoma Visitors will find many places and events that veterans-memorials The Kitsap Peninsula is conveniently located Narrows Bridge and in minutes you will be enjoying miles offer insights about the region’s rich and diverse There are many historic sites, memorials and directly across from Seattle and Tacoma and a short of shoreline, wide-open spaces and fresh air. Explore history, culture, arts and love of the natural museums that pay respect to Kitsap’s remarkable distance from the Seattle-Tacoma International waterfront communities lined with shops, art galleries, environment. You’ll find a few locations listed in Naval, military and maritime history. Some sites the City & Community section in this guide and many more choices date back to the Spanish-American War. Others honor fallen soldiers Airport. One of the most scenic ways to travel to the Kitsap Peninsula eateries and attractions.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did It Fail?
    Why Did It Fail? David W. Fowler The University of Texas at Austin CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar Ausn, Texas Why do structures fail? • Many reasons: – Design (45 to 55%) – Construction (20 to 30% – Materials (15 to 20%) – Administrative (10%) – Maintenance (5 to 10%) CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 2 Ausn, Texas Specific Causes 1. Ignorance/incompetence/inexperience 2. Blunders, errors, and omissions 3. Lack of supervision within organization 4. Lack of communication or continuity 5. Lack of coordination 6. Overemphasis on the bottom line (saving money) 7. Administrative deficiencies 8. Maintenance CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 3 Ausn, Texas Role of Forensic Engineer • Determine the cause of failure • Persuasively communicate his findings to the client and/or appropriate judicial venue • And in some cases, recommend corrections or repairs CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 4 Ausn, Texas We should learn from failures • History is one of our greatest teachers • Some our greatest lessons have come from failures • Unfortunately, the cause of many failures are sealed by agreement of the involved party and the public never learns some very important lessons • University of Maryland experience CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 5 Ausn, Texas Let’s look at some failures… • Tacoma Narrows Bridge Failure: Fowler • Big Dig Ceiling Panel Failure: Fowler • Case Study of Foundation Failure: Chancey CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 6 Ausn, Texas TacomaTacoma NarrowsNarrows BridgeBridge • The most famous bridge failure in the U.S. • It was originally opened to traffic July 1, 1940. • It collapsed four months later, November 7, 1940, at 11:00 am. • It had been exhibiting signs of aerolastic flutter since it opened.
    [Show full text]
  • Toll Bridge Authority 1937-1977
    Guide to the Records of the Office of the Secretary of State Division of Archives and Records Management Olympia, Washington April 2004 1 Guide to the Records of the Washington State Toll Bridge Authority 1937 - 1977 Compiled by Kathleen Waugh Office of the Secretary of State Division of Archives and Records Management Olympia, Washington April 2004 2 INDEX History of Toll Bridge Authority . page 5 Scope and Content . page 8 Note on Arrangement . page 8 Toll Bridge Authority Subject Files . page 9 Files on Individual Bridges . page 13 History of Tacoma Narrows Bridge . page 37 Tunnels . page 63 Tacoma-Seattle-Everett Toll Road . page 64 3 4 TOLL BRIDGE AUTHORITY The Toll Bridge Authority was created by the Legislature in 1937. The state wanted to improve transportation routes by building bridges but had been hampered by restrictions regarding bonding in Article VIII of the state constitution. Therefore the Toll Bridge Authority was given the power to issue revenue bonds which were not limited by Article VIII. It was to select, fund, build and operate bridges which would probably not win approval in a statewide levy. The revenues from the operation of the bridges would pay off the bonds. The membership of the Authority originally consisted of the Governor, the State Auditor, the Director of the Public Service Commission, the Director of Highways, and the Director of the Department of Finance, Budget and Business. By the time the Authority was dissolved in 1977, the membership consisted of the Governor, two members of the State Highway Commission appointed by the Commission, and two other members appointed by the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    / U'^ NPS Form 10-900 OMBNo. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See Instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each Kern by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the Instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property lacoma Marrows tsnage . Ru i ns historic name (jallopmg Cjertie——————— other names/site number 2. Location street & number Jbiignway lo over me lacoma rslarrows not for publication city, town lacoma D vicinity state Washington code WA county rierce code zip code 98406 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property CH private D building(s) Contributing Noncontributing d public-local D district _ buildings CKpublic-State [Kite sites [H public-Federal CH structure structures ED object objects n £ Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A________________ listed in the National Register 0 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1 966, as amended, I hereby certify that this d nomination CD request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the Natio&al Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018
    SR 16 Tacoma Narrows Bridge to SR 3 Congestion Study – December 2018 Executive Summary The purpose of the State Route 16, Tacoma Narrows Bridge to State Route 3, Congestion Study is to identify corridor strategies and solutions to address congestion and traffic operational issues on State Route (SR) 16 between the Tacoma Narrows Bridge (TNB) and SR 3, and along SR 3 between the City of Bremerton and Bremerton Airport, including the SR 16/SR 3 interchange at Gorst. Interchanges on both corridors have high levels of congestion during peak travel times. SR 16 provides access from Tacoma and the surrounding area to the Olympic Peninsula and the cities of Gig Harbor, Port Orchard, and Bremerton. Commuter traffic originating in the study area uses SR 16 and the TNB to reach employment in the Tacoma area and other south Puget Sound destinations. At the north end of the corridor is the Naval Base Kitsap-Bremerton. The Navy attracts commuter traffic from throughout the study area. The SR 16 TNB to SR 3 Congestion Study is a Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Connecting Washington funded project. The project was guided by the WSDOT, an Executive Committee, and Technical Advisory Group representing local jurisdictions and transportation agencies in the corridor. Participants are listed in the preceding pages. A Gorst Planning Study was initiated in 2015 by the Kitsap Regional Coordinating Council, using the WSDOT Practical Solutions approach to evaluate potential solutions to improve mobility issues in the Gorst vicinity; SR 3/SR 16 between Bremerton and Port Orchard. There is significant local concern about traffic in the Gorst area.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Planning Framework
    Appendix G: Trail Planning Framework APPENDIX G: T RAIL P LANNING F RAMEWORK Trail Planning Framework Multiple planning documents and regulations guide growth and development in Pierce County. State, county, city and local planning efforts create layers of goals and policies. To prevent contradiction or conflict, this appendix provides an overview of planning efforts that relate to the Pierce County Regional Trails Plan (PCRTP). Washington State Trails Plan The State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) is responsible for the Washington State Trails Plan. Accepted by the National Park Service in 1991, the Plan is an element of the Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Planning (SCORP) program. The Plan establishes a number of trail related goals and identifies different trail users. Specific goals related to the Pierce County Regional Trails Plan include: Develop new trails and paths in city and county jurisdictions; Connect trail systems and populated areas via trails and paths; and Increase the miles of trail available in semi-primitive and other remote settings. Trail Settings The Washington State Trails Plan classifies trails by the setting that trail users prefer, which can range from primitive to urban. These trail settings can be restricted or designed for one specific use, or they may be designed for different types of uses (a multi-use trail). The State also identifies water trails as a distinctive trail type. As defined in the State Trail Plan, trail settings include: . Primitive. The most remote parts of the forest where you will meet few if any people. Access is by cross-country travel or by trails. No motorized use is allowed.
    [Show full text]