DOCSLIB.ORG

Spin Networks and Quantum Gravity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CGPG Spin Networks and Quantum Gravity y Carlo Rovelli and Lee Smolin Department of Physics University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh Pa y Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry Department of Physics Pennsylvania State University University Park Pa and School of Natural Science Institute for Advanced Study Princeton NJ April Abstract We intro duce a new basis on the state space of nonp erturbative quantum gravity The states of this basis are linearly indep endent are well dened in b oth the lo op representation and the connection representation and are lab eled by a generalization of Penroses spin networks The new basis fully gr-qc/9505006 4 May 1995 reduces the spinor identities SU Mandelstam identities and simplies calculations in nonp erturbative quantum gravity In particular it allows a simple expression for the exact solutions of the Hamiltonian constraint WheelerDeWitt equation that have b een discovered in the lo op represen tation Since the states in this basis diagonalize op erators that represent the three geometry of space such as the area and volumes of arbitrary surfaces and regions these states provide a discrete picture of quantum geometry at the Planck scale y rovellivmscispittedu smolinphyspsuedu Intro duction The lo op representation is a formulation of quantum eld theory suit able when the degrees of freedom of the theory are given by a gauge eld or a connection This formulation has b een used in the context of contin uum and lattice gauge theory and it has found a particularly eective application in quantum gravity b ecause it allows a description of the dieomorphism invariant quantum states in terms of knot theory and at the same time b ecause it partially diagonalizes the quantum dynamics of the theory leading to the discovery of solutions of the dynamical constraints Recent results in quantum gravity based on the lo op representation include the construction of a nite physical Hamiltonian op erator for pure gravity and fermions the computation of the physical sp ectra of area and volume and the develop ement of a p erturbation scheme that may allow transition amplitudes to b e explicitely computed A mathematically rigorous formulation of quantum eld theories whose cong uration space is a space of connections inspired by the lo op representation has b een recently develop ed and the kinematics of the theory is now on a level of rigor comparable to that of constructive quantum eld theory This approach has also pro duced interesting mathematical spino s such as the construction of dieomorphism invariant generalised measures on spaces of connections and could b e relevant for a constructive eld theory approach to nonab elian YangMills theories Applications of the lo op representation however have b een burdened by complications arising from two technical nuisances The rst is given by the Mandelstam identities b ecause of which the lo op states are not indep endent and form an overcomplete basis The second is the presence of a certain sign n factor in the denition of the fundamental lo op op erators T for n This sign dep ends on the global connectivity of the lo ops on which the op erator acts and obstructs a simple lo cal graphical description of the op erators action In this work we describ e an elegant way to overcome b oth of these complications This comes from using a particular basis which we denote as spin network basis since it is related to the spin networks of Penrose The spin network basis has the following prop erties i It solves the Mandelstam identities n ii It allows a simple and entirely lo cal graphical calculus for the T op erators iii It diagonalises the area and volume op erators The spin network basis states b eing eigenstates of op erators that corresp ond to measurement of the physical geometry provide a physical picture of the three dimensional quantum geometry of space at the Planckscale level The main idea b ehind this construction long advo cated by R Loll is to identify a basis of indep endent lo op states in which the Mandelstam identities are completely reduced We achieve such a result by exploiting the fact that all irreducible representations of SU are built by symmetrized p owers of the fundamental representation We will show that in the lo op representation this translates into the fact that we can suitably antisym metrize all lo ops overlapping each other without lo osing generality More precisely the suitably antisymmetrized lo op states span but do not over span the kinematical state space of quantum gravity The indep endent basis states constructed in this way turn out to b e lab elled by Penroses spin networks and by a direct generalization of these A spin network is a graph whose links are colored by integers sat isfying simple relations at the intersections Roger Penrose intro duced spin networks in a context unrelated to the present one remarkably however his aim was to explore a quantum mechanical description of the geometry of space which is the same ambition that underlies the lo op representation construction The idea of using a spin network basis has app eared in other contexts in which holonomy of a connection plays a role including lattice gauge theory and top ological quantum eld theory The use of this basis in quantum gravity has b een suggested previously but its precise implementation had to await resolution of the sign diculties mentioned ab ove Here these diculties are solved by altering a sign in the relation b etween the graphical notation of a lo op and the corresp onding quantum state This mo died graphical notation for the lo op states allows us to reduce the lo op states to the indep endent ones by simply antisym metrizing overlapping lo ops The spinnetwork construction has already suggested several directions of investigation which are b eing pursued at the present time The fact that it diagonalizes the op erator that measures the volume of a spatial slice gives us a physical picture of a discrete quantum geometry and also makes the spin network basis useful for p erturbation expansions of the dynamics of general relativity as describ ed in It has also played a role in the mathematically rigorous investigations of refs Another intriguing suggestion is the p ossibility of considering q deformed spinnetworks on which we will comment in the conclusion The details of the application of the spin network basis to the diagonal ization of the volume and area op erators have b een describ ed in an earlier pap er The primary aim of this pap er is to give an intro duction to the spin network basis and to its use in nonp erturbative quantum gravity We emphasize the details of its construction at a level of detail and rigor that we hop e will b e useful for practical calculations in quantum gravity No claims are made of mathematical rigor for that we p oint the reader to the recent works by Baez and Thiemann where the spin network basis is put in a rigorous mathematical context Finally we note that in this pap er we work with SL C or SU spinors which are relevant for the application to quantum gravity but a spin network basis such as the one we describ e exists for all compact gauge groups This pap er is organized as follows In the next section we briey explain the two problems that motivate the use of the spin network basis This leads to section in which we provide the denition of spin network states in the lo op representation In section we describ e the spin network states as they app ear in the connection representation The pro of that the spin network states do form a basis of indep endent states may then b e given in section Following this in section we review the general structure of the transformation theory in the sense of Dirac b etween the lo op representa tion and the connection representation The use of the spin network basis considerably simplies the transformation theory as we show here Simi larly old results on the existence of solutions to the hamiltonian constraint and exact physical states of quantum gravity may b e expressed in a simpler way in terms of the spin network basis Its use makes it unnecessary to explicitly compute the extensions of characteristic states of nonintersecting 1 knots to intersecting lo ops as describ ed in Finally an imp ortant side result of the analysis ab ove is that it indicates how to mo dify the graphical calculus in lo op space in order to get rid of the annoying nonlo cality due to the dep endence on global ro oting The new notation that allows a fully lo cal calculus is dened in section The pap er closes with a brief summary of the results in section and with a short 1 These characteristic states were previously dened to b e equal to one on the knot class of a nonintersecting lo op zero on all other nonintersecting lo ops with an extension to the classes of intersecting lo ops dened by solving the Mandelstam identities Now they may b e succinctly describ ed as b eing equal to one on one element of the spin network basis and zero on all the others app endix in which we discuss the details of the construction of higher than trivalent vertices Denition of the problem The lo op representation is dened by the choice of a basis of bra states hj on the state space of the quantum eld theory These states are lab elled by lo ops By a lo op we mean here a set of a nite numb er of single lo ops 1 by a single lo op we mean a piecewise smo oth map from the circle S into the space manifold The lo op basis
Recommended publications
  • Covariant Phase Space for Gravity with Boundaries: Metric Vs Tetrad Formulations

    Covariant Phase Space for Gravity with Boundaries: Metric Vs Tetrad Formulations

    Covariant phase space for gravity with boundaries: metric vs tetrad formulations J. Fernando Barbero G.c,d Juan Margalef-Bentabola,c Valle Varob,c Eduardo J.S. Villaseñorb,c aInstitute for Gravitation and the Cosmos and Physics Department. Penn State University. PA 16802, USA. bDepartamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Avda. de la Universidad 30, 28911 Leganés, Spain. cGrupo de Teorías de Campos y Física Estadística. Instituto Gregorio Millán (UC3M). Unidad Asociada al Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Madrid, Spain. dInstituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano 123, 28006, Madrid, Spain E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: We use covariant phase space methods to study the metric and tetrad formula- tions of General Relativity in a manifold with boundary and compare the results obtained in both approaches. Proving their equivalence has been a long-lasting problem that we solve here by using the cohomological approach provided by the relative bicomplex framework. This setting provides a clean and ambiguity-free way to describe the solution spaces and associated symplectic structures. We also compute several relevant charges in both schemes and show that they are equivalent, as expected. arXiv:2103.06362v2 [gr-qc] 14 Jun 2021 Contents I Introduction1 II The geometric arena2 II.1 M as a space-time2 II.2 From M-vector fields to F-vector fields3 II.3 CPS-Algorithm4 IIIGeneral Relativity in terms of metrics5 IV General relativity in terms of tetrads8 V Metric vs Tetrad formulation 13 V.1 Space of solutions 13 V.2 Presymplectic structures 14 VI Conclusions 15 A Ancillary material 16 A.1 Mathematical background 16 A.2 Some computations in the metric case 19 A.3 Some tetrad computations 21 Bibliography 22 I Introduction Space-time boundaries play a prominent role in classical and quantum General Relativity (GR).
  • Open Dissertation-Final.Pdf

    Open Dissertation-Final.Pdf

    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School The Eberly College of Science CORRELATIONS IN QUANTUM GRAVITY AND COSMOLOGY A Dissertation in Physics by Bekir Baytas © 2018 Bekir Baytas Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2018 The dissertation of Bekir Baytas was reviewed and approved∗ by the following: Sarah Shandera Assistant Professor of Physics Dissertation Advisor, Chair of Committee Eugenio Bianchi Assistant Professor of Physics Martin Bojowald Professor of Physics Donghui Jeong Assistant Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics Nitin Samarth Professor of Physics Head of the Department of Physics ∗Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. ii Abstract We study what kind of implications and inferences one can deduce by studying correlations which are realized in various physical systems. In particular, this thesis focuses on specific correlations in systems that are considered in quantum gravity (loop quantum gravity) and cosmology. In loop quantum gravity, a spin-network basis state, nodes of the graph describe un-entangled quantum regions of space, quantum polyhedra. We introduce Bell- network states and study correlations of quantum polyhedra in a dipole, a pentagram and a generic graph. We find that vector geometries, structures with neighboring polyhedra having adjacent faces glued back-to-back, arise from Bell-network states. The results present show clearly the role that entanglement plays in the gluing of neighboring quantum regions of space. We introduce a discrete quantum spin system in which canonical effective methods for background independent theories of quantum gravity can be tested with promising results. In particular, features of interacting dynamics are analyzed with an emphasis on homogeneous configurations and the dynamical building- up and stability of long-range correlations.
  • Pos(Rio De Janeiro 2012)002 † ∗ Ashtekar@Gravity.Psu.Edu Speaker

    Pos(Rio De Janeiro 2012)002 † ∗ [email protected] Speaker

    Loop Quantum Gravity and the Very Early Universe PoS(Rio de Janeiro 2012)002 Abhay Ashtekar∗† Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry, Physics Department, Penn State, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] This brief overview is addressed to beginning researchers. It begins with a discussion of the distinguishing features of loop quantum gravity, then illustrates the type of issues that must be faced by any quantum gravity theory, and concludes with a brief summary of the status of these issues in loop quantum gravity. For concreteness the emphasis is on cosmology. Since several introductory as well as detailed reviews of loop quantum gravity are already available in the literature, the focus is on explaining the overall viewpoint and providing a short bibliography to introduce the interested reader to literature. 7th Conference Mathematical Methods in Physics - Londrina 2012, 16 to 20 April 2012 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ∗Speaker. †A footnote may follow. c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike Licence. http://pos.sissa.it/ Loop Quantum Gravity Abhay Ashtekar Loop quantum gravity (LQG) is a non-perturbative approach aimed at unifying general rela- tivity and quantum physics. Its distinguishing features are: i) Background independence, and, ii) Underlying unity of the mathematical framework used to describe gravity and the other three basic forces of nature. It is background independent in the sense that there are no background fields, not even a space-time metric. All fields —whether they represent matter constituents, or gauge fields that mediate fundamental forces between them, or space- time geometry itself— are treated on the same footing.
  • BEYOND SPACE and TIME the Secret Network of the Universe: How Quantum Geometry Might Complete Einstein’S Dream

    BEYOND SPACE and TIME the Secret Network of the Universe: How Quantum Geometry Might Complete Einstein’S Dream

    BEYOND SPACE AND TIME The secret network of the universe: How quantum geometry might complete Einstein’s dream By Rüdiger Vaas With the help of a few innocuous - albeit subtle and potent - equations, Abhay Ashtekar can escape the realm of ordinary space and time. The mathematics developed specifically for this purpose makes it possible to look behind the scenes of the apparent stage of all events - or better yet: to shed light on the very foundation of reality. What sounds like black magic, is actually incredibly hard physics. Were Albert Einstein alive today, it would have given him great pleasure. For the goal is to fulfil the big dream of a unified theory of gravity and the quantum world. With the new branch of science of quantum geometry, also called loop quantum gravity, Ashtekar has come close to fulfilling this dream - and tries thereby, in addition, to answer the ultimate questions of physics: the mysteries of the big bang and black holes. "On the Planck scale there is a precise, rich, and discrete structure,” says Ashtekar, professor of physics and Director of the Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry at Pennsylvania State University. The Planck scale is the smallest possible length scale with units of the order of 10-33 centimeters. That is 20 orders of magnitude smaller than what the world’s best particle accelerators can detect. At this scale, Einstein’s theory of general relativity fails. Its subject is the connection between space, time, matter and energy. But on the Planck scale it gives unreasonable values - absurd infinities and singularities.
  • Twistor Theory at Fifty: from Rspa.Royalsocietypublishing.Org Contour Integrals to Twistor Strings Michael Atiyah1,2, Maciej Dunajski3 and Lionel Review J

    Twistor Theory at Fifty: from Rspa.Royalsocietypublishing.Org Contour Integrals to Twistor Strings Michael Atiyah1,2, Maciej Dunajski3 and Lionel Review J

    Downloaded from http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on November 10, 2017 Twistor theory at fifty: from rspa.royalsocietypublishing.org contour integrals to twistor strings Michael Atiyah1,2, Maciej Dunajski3 and Lionel Review J. Mason4 Cite this article: Atiyah M, Dunajski M, Mason LJ. 2017 Twistor theory at fifty: from 1School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh, King’s Buildings, contour integrals to twistor strings. Proc. R. Edinburgh EH9 3JZ, UK Soc. A 473: 20170530. 2Trinity College Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Cambridge http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0530 CB21TQ,UK 3Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, Received: 1 August 2017 University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK Accepted: 8 September 2017 4The Mathematical Institute, Andrew Wiles Building, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK Subject Areas: MD, 0000-0002-6477-8319 mathematical physics, high-energy physics, geometry We review aspects of twistor theory, its aims and achievements spanning the last five decades. In Keywords: the twistor approach, space–time is secondary twistor theory, instantons, self-duality, with events being derived objects that correspond to integrable systems, twistor strings compact holomorphic curves in a complex threefold— the twistor space. After giving an elementary construction of this space, we demonstrate how Author for correspondence: solutions to linear and nonlinear equations of Maciej Dunajski mathematical physics—anti-self-duality equations e-mail: [email protected] on Yang–Mills or conformal curvature—can be encoded into twistor cohomology. These twistor correspondences yield explicit examples of Yang– Mills and gravitational instantons, which we review. They also underlie the twistor approach to integrability: the solitonic systems arise as symmetry reductions of anti-self-dual (ASD) Yang–Mills equations, and Einstein–Weyl dispersionless systems are reductions of ASD conformal equations.
  • The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) Vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity

    The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) Vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity

    The Pauli Exclusion Principle and SU(2) vs. SO(3) in Loop Quantum Gravity John Swain Department of Physics, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA email: [email protected] (Submitted for the Gravity Research Foundation Essay Competition, March 27, 2003) ABSTRACT Recent attempts to resolve the ambiguity in the loop quantum gravity description of the quantization of area has led to the idea that j =1edgesof spin-networks dominate in their contribution to black hole areas as opposed to j =1=2 which would naively be expected. This suggests that the true gauge group involved might be SO(3) rather than SU(2) with attendant difficulties. We argue that the assumption that a version of the Pauli principle is present in loop quantum gravity allows one to maintain SU(2) as the gauge group while still naturally achieving the desired suppression of spin-1/2 punctures. Areas come from j = 1 punctures rather than j =1=2 punctures for much the same reason that photons lead to macroscopic classically observable fields while electrons do not. 1 I. INTRODUCTION The recent successes of the approach to canonical quantum gravity using the Ashtekar variables have been numerous and significant. Among them are the proofs that area and volume operators have discrete spectra, and a derivation of black hole entropy up to an overall undetermined constant [1]. An excellent recent review leading directly to this paper is by Baez [2], and its influence on this introduction will be clear. The basic idea is that a basis for the solution of the quantum constraint equations is given by spin-network states, which are graphs whose edges carry representations j of SU(2).
  • Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics. Carlo Rovelli

    Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics. Carlo Rovelli

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PhilSci Archive Physics needs philosophy. Philosophy needs physics. Carlo Rovelli Extended version of a keynote talk at the XVIII UK-European Conference on the Foundation of Physics, given at the London School of Economics the 16 July 2016 Published on Foundations of Physics, 48, 481-491, 2018 Abstract Contrary to claims about the irrelevance of philosophy for science, I argue that philosophy has had, and still has, far more influence on physics than is commonly assumed. I maintain that the current anti-philosophical ideology has had damaging effects on the fertility of science. I also suggest that recent important empirical results, such as the detection of the Higgs particle and gravitational waves, and the failure to detect supersymmetry where many expected to find it, question the validity of certain philosophical assumptions common among theoretical physicists, inviting us to engage in a clearer philosophical reflection on scientific method. 1. Against Philosophy is the title of a chapter of a book by one of the great physicists of the last generation: Steven Weinberg, Nobel Prize winner and one of the architects of the Standard Model of elementary particle physicsi. Weinberg argues eloquently that philosophy is more damaging than helpful for physics—although it might provide some good ideas at times, it is often a straightjacket that physicists have to free themselves from. More radically, Stephen Hawking famously wrote that “philosophy is dead” because the big questions that used to be discussed by philosophers are now in the hands of physicistsii.
  • Loop Quantum Gravity: the First 25 Years Carlo Rovelli

    Loop Quantum Gravity: the First 25 Years Carlo Rovelli

    Loop quantum gravity: the first 25 years Carlo Rovelli To cite this version: Carlo Rovelli. Loop quantum gravity: the first 25 years. Classical and Quantum Gravity, IOP Publishing, 2011, 28 (15), pp.153002. 10.1088/0264-9381/28/15/153002. hal-00723006 HAL Id: hal-00723006 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00723006 Submitted on 7 Aug 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Loop quantum gravity: the first twenty five years Carlo Rovelli Centre de Physique Th´eorique de Luminy∗, Case 907, F-13288 Marseille, EU (Dated: January 27, 2011) I give a synthetic presentation of loop quantum gravity. I spell-out the aims of the theory and compare the results obtained with the initial hopes that motivated the early interest in this research direction. I give my own perspective on the status of the program and attempt of a critical evaluation of its successes and limits. I. INTRODUCTION The history of quantum gravity is full of great hopes later disappointed. I remember as a young student sitting in a major conference where a world-renowned physicists Loop gravity is not quite twenty-five years old, but announced that the final theory of quantum gravity and is getting close to such a venerable age: several basic everything had finally been found.
  • Laudatio for Professor Abhay Ashtekar

    Laudatio for Professor Abhay Ashtekar

    Laudatio for Professor Abhay Ashtekar Professor Ashtekar is a remarkable ¯gure in the ¯eld of Ein- stein's gravity. This being the Einstein Year and, moreover, the World Year of Physics, one can hardly think of anyone more ¯tting to be honoured for his research and his achievements { achievements that have influenced the most varied aspects of gravitational theory in a profound way. Prof. Ashtekar is the Eberly Professor of Physics and the Di- rector of the Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry at Penn State University in the United States. His research in gravitational theory is notable for its breadth, covering quantum gravity and generalizations of quantum mechanics, but also clas- sical general relativity, the mathematical theory of black holes and gravitational waves. Our view of the world has undergone many revisions in the past, two of which, arguably the most revolutionary, were ini- tiated by Einstein in his annus mirabilis, 1905. For one thing, the theory of special relativity turned our notion of space and time on its ear for speeds approaching that of light. At the same time, Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric e®ect heralded the coming of quantum theory. Many of the best minds in theo- retical physics, including Einstein himself, have been trying for years to ¯nd a uni¯ed theory of relativity and quantum theory. Such a theory, often called quantum gravity, could, for example, provide an explanation for the initial moments of our universe just after the big bang. Especially noteworthy is Prof. Ashtekar's work on the canon- ical quantization of gravitation, which is based upon a reformu- lation of Einstein's ¯eld equations that Ashtekar presented 1986.
  • MATTERS of GRAVITY, a Newsletter for the Gravity Community, Number 3

    MATTERS of GRAVITY, a Newsletter for the Gravity Community, Number 3

    MATTERS OF GRAVITY Number 3 Spring 1994 Table of Contents Editorial ................................................... ................... 2 Correspondents ................................................... ............ 2 Gravity news: Open Letter to gravitational physicists, Beverly Berger ........................ 3 A Missouri relativist in King Gustav’s Court, Clifford Will .................... 6 Gary Horowitz wins the Xanthopoulos award, Abhay Ashtekar ................ 9 Research briefs: Gamma-ray bursts and their possible cosmological implications, Peter Meszaros 12 Current activity and results in laboratory gravity, Riley Newman ............. 15 Update on representations of quantum gravity, Donald Marolf ................ 19 Ligo project report: December 1993, Rochus E. Vogt ......................... 23 Dark matter or new gravity?, Richard Hammond ............................. 25 Conference Reports: Gravitational waves from coalescing compact binaries, Curt Cutler ........... 28 Mach’s principle: from Newton’s bucket to quantum gravity, Dieter Brill ..... 31 Cornelius Lanczos international centenary conference, David Brown .......... 33 Third Midwest relativity conference, David Garfinkle ......................... 36 arXiv:gr-qc/9402002v1 1 Feb 1994 Editor: Jorge Pullin Center for Gravitational Physics and Geometry The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA 16802-6300 Fax: (814)863-9608 Phone (814)863-9597 Internet: [email protected] 1 Editorial Well, this newsletter is growing into its third year and third number with a lot of strength. In fact, maybe too much strength. Twelve articles and 37 (!) pages. In this number, apart from the ”traditional” research briefs and conference reports we also bring some news for the community, therefore starting to fulfill the original promise of bringing the gravity/relativity community closer together. As usual I am open to suggestions, criticisms and proposals for articles for the next issue, due September 1st. Many thanks to the authors and the correspondents who made this issue possible.
  • Spin Networks and Sl(2, C)-Character Varieties

    Spin Networks and Sl(2, C)-Character Varieties

    SPIN NETWORKS AND SL(2; C)-CHARACTER VARIETIES SEAN LAWTON AND ELISHA PETERSON Abstract. Denote the free group on 2 letters by F2 and the SL(2; C)-representation variety of F2 by R = Hom(F2; SL(2; C)). The group SL(2; C) acts on R by conjugation, and the ring of in- variants C[R]SL(2;C) is precisely the coordinate ring of the SL(2; C)- character variety of a three-holed sphere. We construct an iso- morphism between the coordinate ring C[SL(2; C)] and the ring of matrix coe±cients, providing an additive basis of C[R]SL(2;C). Our main results use a spin network description of this basis to give a strong symmetry within the basis, a graphical means of computing the product of two basis elements, and an algorithm for comput- ing the basis elements. This provides a concrete description of the regular functions on the SL(2; C)-character variety of F2 and a new proof of a classical result of Fricke, Klein, and Vogt. 1. Introduction The purpose of this work is to demonstrate the utility of a graph- ical calculus in the algebraic study of SL(2; C)-representations of the fundamental group of a surface of Euler characteristic -1. Let F2 be a rank 2 free group, the fundamental group of both the three-holed sphere and the one-holed torus. The set of representations R = Hom(F2; SL(2; C)) inherits the structure of an algebraic set from SL(2; C). The subset of representations that are completely reducible, denoted by Rss, have closed orbits under conjugation.
  • 150 Abhay Ashtekar

    150 Abhay Ashtekar

    ICTS PUBLIC LECTURE BIG BANG, BLACK HOLES AND GRAVITATIONAL WAVES Illustrations of Paradigm Shifts in Fundamental Science Big Bang, Black Holes and Gravitational Waves now appear as compelling – even obvious – consequences of general relativity. Therefore, it may seem surprising that none of these ideas were readily accepted. Not only was there considerable debate, but in fact leading figures were often arguing on what turned out to be the “wrong side” of history. These developments provide excellent lessons for younger researchers on how science un-folds. Paradigm shifts in science occur when younger researchers have the courage not to accept ideas merely because they are mainstream; patience to systematically develop novel avenues they deeply believe in; and maturity to accept that a variety of factors – not all logical or even science related – can drive or slow down scientific progress. ABHAY ASHTEKAR Pennsylvania State University Abhay Ashtekar is the Eberly Professor of Physics and the Director of the Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry at Pennsylvania State University. His research interests span different aspects of General Relativity, Quantum Gravity and Black Holes. The recipient of the Einstein Prize and the Senior Research Prize of the Humboldt Foundation, his work is widely recognized. He is an elected member of the US National Academy of Sciences, Elected Fellow of the American Association for Advancement of Science, American Physical Society and Honorary Fellow of the Indian Academy of Sciences, and has served as the president of International Society for General Relativity and Gravitation. 4 pm, 21 August, 2019 ICTS, Bengaluru Register online https://bit.ly/AbhayAshtekar BG Image – Frame from a simulation of the merger of two black holes and the resulting emission of gravitational radiation (colored fields).