DOCSLIB.ORG

Rainy River Basin Information Document – 2001 Page Ii Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rainy River Basin Information Document – 2001 Page Ii Table of Contents Rainy River Basin Information Document December 2001 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Rainy River Basin Information Document Table of Contents Section 1 - Minnesota Water Planning Framework I. Water Planning and Management Framework in Minnesota..................................................I-1 A. County Water Plans and Watershed Management Organization Plans...............I-1 B. Major Watershed Plans .........................................................................................I-2 1. Funding Watershed Planning and Management.............................................I-3 2. Other Watershed-Based Programs .................................................................I-3 a. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Watershed Management Initiative................................................................................I-3 b. Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) .........................................................I-3 C. Basin Plans ............................................................................................................I-4 D. Minnesota Watermarks - Gauging the Flow of Progress 2000 - 2010..................I-5 E. Minnesota Nonpoint Source (NPS) Water Pollution Management Program Plan ........................................................................................................................I-5 II. Rainy River Basin Specific Efforts ...........................................................................................I-6 A. Basin Level Planning Activities ..............................................................................I-6 B. Local and Minor Watershed Planning Activities ....................................................I-6 III. How Basin Planning and Management Can Help to Improve Water Management in the Rainy River Basin...............................................................................................................I-6 IV. Preliminary Process to Develop the Rainy River Basin Plan ..................................................I-7 A. Objectives ..............................................................................................................I-7 B. Process Overview ..................................................................................................I-7 C. Planning Committee Mission .................................................................................I-8 V. Commonly Used Acronyms ...................................................................................................I-10 Section 2 - Description of the Rainy River Basin Subsection 1 - Rainy River Basin Overview .................................................................................II-1 I. Ecological Classification Systems (ECS) - Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) ......................................................................................................................................II-2 A. Classes in the Rainy River Basin..........................................................................II-3 1. Laurentian Mixed Forest Province..................................................................II-3 2. Plant Communities..........................................................................................II-3 3. Forest Canopy.................................................................................................II-3 4. Shrub Layers...................................................................................................II-4 5. Groundlayer.....................................................................................................II-4 B. Biomes in the Rainy River Basin ..........................................................................II-4 1. Border Lakes ...................................................................................................II-4 a. Landforms .................................................................................................II-5 b. Bedrock Geology.......................................................................................II-5 c. Soils...........................................................................................................II-5 Rainy River Basin Information Document – 2001 Page ii Table of Contents d. Climate ......................................................................................................II-5 e. Hydrology ..................................................................................................II-5 f. Presettlement Vegetation..........................................................................II-5 g. Present Vegetation and Land Use............................................................II-6 h. Natural Disturbance ..................................................................................II-6 2. Laurentian Highlands ......................................................................................II-6 a. Landforms .................................................................................................II-6 b. Bedrock Geology.......................................................................................II-6 c. Soils...........................................................................................................II-7 d. Climate ......................................................................................................II-7 e. Hydrology ..................................................................................................II-7 f. Presettlement Vegetation..........................................................................II-7 g. Present Vegetation and Land Use............................................................II-7 h. Natural Disturbance ..................................................................................II-7 3. Nashwauk Uplands .........................................................................................II-8 a. Landforms .................................................................................................II-8 b. Bedrock Geology.......................................................................................II-8 c. Soils...........................................................................................................II-8 d. Climate ......................................................................................................II-8 e. Hydrology ..................................................................................................II-9 f. Presettlement Vegetation..........................................................................II-9 g. Present Vegetation and Land Use............................................................II-9 h. Natural Disturbance ..................................................................................II-9 4. Little Fork - Vermilion Uplands........................................................................II-9 a. Landforms .................................................................................................II-9 b. Bedrock Geology.......................................................................................II-9 c. Soils.........................................................................................................II-10 d. Climate ....................................................................................................II-10 e. Hydrology ................................................................................................II-10 f. Presettlement Vegetation........................................................................II-10 g. Present Vegetation and Land Use..........................................................II-10 h. Natural Disturbance ................................................................................II-10 5. St. Louis Moraines ........................................................................................II-11 a. Landforms ...............................................................................................II-11 b. Bedrock Geology.....................................................................................II-11 c. Soils.........................................................................................................II-11 d. Climate ....................................................................................................II-11 e. Hydrology ................................................................................................II-11 f. Presettlement Vegetation........................................................................II-12 g. Present Vegetation and Land Use..........................................................II-12 h. Natural Disturbance ................................................................................II-12 6. Chippewa Plains ...........................................................................................II-12 a. Landforms ...............................................................................................II-12 b. Bedrock Geology.....................................................................................II-12 c. Soils.........................................................................................................II-13 d. Climate ....................................................................................................II-13 e. Hydrology ................................................................................................II-13 f. Presettlement Vegetation........................................................................II-13
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Superior South Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report
    Summary Monitoring and Assessment Lake Superior-South Watershed Why is it The undeveloped nature of the Lake Superior-South Watershed, along Minnesota’s North Shore within the Lake Superior Basin, is undoubtedly a key reason for the high important? water quality found in most parts of the watershed. This watershed covers 624 square miles of St. Louis and Lake counties, with nearly half of the land under state ownership (42%). Almost 90% is forested. The watershed is home to several small cities and supports diverse species of wildlife and fish populations. It contains 1,067 miles of streams of which 800 are designated as coldwater. Its immaculate waters produce some of the state’s highest-quality stream trout fisheries. The watershed is a valuable resource for drinking water, habitat for aquatic life, recreational opportunities and timber production. Key issues Overall, water quality conditions are good and can be attributed to the forest and wetlands that dominate the watershed’s land cover. Many stream segments have exceptional biological, chemical, and physical characteristics and should be considered for additional protections to preserve their high quality. The top five stream resources include: McCarthy Creek, Unnamed Creek (West Branch Little Knife River), Gooseberry River, Stewart River and Captain Jacobson Creek. Problem areas do occur but are typically limited to the lower reaches of streams where stressors from land use practices may accumulate. Impairments are likely a function of both natural and human-caused stressors. Historical and recent forest cover changes, along with urban/industrial development, draining of wetlands and damming of streams are likely stressors affecting biological communities within the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Statutes 2020, Chapter 85
    1​ MINNESOTA STATUTES 2020​ 85.011​ CHAPTER 85​ DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION​ STATE PARKS, RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES​ 85.06​ SCHOOLHOUSES IN CERTAIN STATE PARKS.​ 85.011​ CONFIRMATION OF CREATION AND​ 85.20​ VIOLATIONS OF RULES; LITTERING; PENALTIES.​ ESTABLISHMENT OF STATE PARKS, STATE​ 85.205​ RECEPTACLES FOR RECYCLING.​ RECREATION AREAS, AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.21​ STATE OPERATION OF PARK, MONUMENT,​ 85.0115​ NOTICE OF ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS.​ RECREATION AREA AND WAYSIDE FACILITIES;​ 85.012​ STATE PARKS.​ LICENSE NOT REQUIRED.​ 85.013​ STATE RECREATION AREAS AND WAYSIDES.​ 85.22​ STATE PARKS WORKING CAPITAL ACCOUNT.​ 85.014​ PRIOR LAWS NOT ALTERED; REVISOR'S DUTIES.​ 85.23​ COOPERATIVE LEASES OF AGRICULTURAL​ 85.0145​ ACQUIRING LAND FOR FACILITIES.​ LANDS.​ 85.0146​ CUYUNA COUNTRY STATE RECREATION AREA;​ 85.32​ STATE WATER TRAILS.​ CITIZENS ADVISORY COUNCIL.​ 85.33​ ST. CROIX WILD RIVER AREA; LIMITATIONS ON​ STATE TRAILS​ POWER BOATING.​ 85.015​ STATE TRAILS.​ 85.34​ FORT SNELLING LEASE.​ 85.0155​ LAKE SUPERIOR WATER TRAIL.​ TRAIL PASSES​ 85.0156​ MISSISSIPPI WHITEWATER TRAIL.​ 85.40​ DEFINITIONS.​ 85.016​ BICYCLE TRAIL PROGRAM.​ 85.41​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI PASSES.​ 85.017​ TRAIL REGISTRY.​ 85.42​ USER FEE; VALIDITY.​ 85.018​ TRAIL USE; VEHICLES REGULATED, RESTRICTED.​ 85.43​ DISPOSITION OF RECEIPTS; PURPOSE.​ ADMINISTRATION​ 85.44​ CROSS-COUNTRY-SKI TRAIL GRANT-IN-AID​ 85.019​ LOCAL RECREATION GRANTS.​ PROGRAM.​ 85.021​ ACQUIRING LAND; MINNESOTA VALLEY TRAIL.​ 85.45​ PENALTIES.​ 85.04​ ENFORCEMENT DIVISION EMPLOYEES.​ 85.46​ HORSE
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi 1.Ai
    A STATE WATER TRAIL GUIDE TO THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER HenryHennrry O.O BjoringBjorBjoring WMAWWMMA Lake BuenaBuena VistaVistata State ForestForo est 3939 g g g g g LEGEND g ake L on on TurtleTurtle RiverRiver L L CampsiteCampsite Lake Bemidji State Park she Vehicle Permit Required imu 8989 P Carry-in Access Campground Drinking Water Hospital 2020 2020 TurtleTurtle RiRiverver Tu CSAHCSAH # 200 Landing r y tle Water Access Watercraft Campsite r Dam River Mile 71 da n ou Big RiceRice Outfitter Safe Refuge Interpretive Center Rapids er LakeLake Northwoods n B RiverRiv y Safe Refuge is shelter with atio r Dock Point of Interest v access to a telephone r Little Bass e es Rest Area Picnic Area Fish Hatchery Lavinia Lake unda n R Lake Bemidji t Bo a Northernmost point of i d es Caution Areas r the Mississippi River o Fishing Pier In 2 F Designated e Stump Lake k Cameron Park al a Big LakeLake Public Land KitchiKitchi LLakeake tion Grass Stump Lake 1280 Indian Reservation BoundaryLeech Lake Grant Mississippi River L 197 a Diamond Lake ke 1275 Daniel Lake WMA Point Park Boundary National Forest Chippewa 12 Interstate HighwayU.S. Highway State Highway County Road Bemidji 12 R Andrusia (N) 19 39 01234miles Co. Rd. 12 W.M.A. = Wildlife Management Area paddling across the lake is not recommended; if submerged pilings at access, you must do so, stay closer to the shore. North stay in marked channel Swenson Knutson Dam Rec. Area 0 1234kilometers S.N.A. = Scientific and Natural Area reek Portage Right • 297 yards Island Point Lake Grant C numerous log jams Nymore Beach 33 paddlers are advised to respect exist in this section Little Missis Township Bridge 11 the power of the wind on a large Lake lake and stay away from the river level L R Mississippi Headwaters gauge Irving ake Andrusia center.
    [Show full text]
  • What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H
    A publication oF the Superior Hiking TrAil AssoCiation SUmmEr 2019 What the “Trail Eyes” Pros Taught Us About the SHT P H o im Malzhan iS the trail operations director T o for our sister trail organization the ice Age B y Fr Trail Alliance in Wisconsin. Doing business as esh T “Trail Eyes,” Tim was one of four entities the SHTA Tr hired in the fall of 2018 to evaluate and recom- ac mend renewal strategies for what we have dubbed k S mE D “The Big Bad Five,” those sections of the SHT most damaged from heavy use and old age (or both). i A Though all four evaluators—malzhan, Critical Connections Ecological Services (Jason and Amy Husveth), the north Country Trail Association, and (Continued on page 2) What the “Trail Eyes” Taught Us About the SHT (continued from cover) Great Lakes Trail Builders (Wil- lie Bittner)—did what we asked (provide specific prescriptions for the Big Bad Five), their ex- pert observations gave us much more: they shed light on the en- tire Superior Hiking Trail. In other words, what they saw on the Split Rock River loop, or the sections from Britton Peak to Oberg Mountain and Oberg to the Lutsen ski complex, or the proposed reroute of the SHT north of Gooseberry Falls State Park, were microcosms of bigger, more systemic issues with the SHT. ❚ “keep people on the Trail and water off of it.” This suc- cinct wisdom comes from Matt no bridge is not the only problem at the Split rock river loop.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Status, Distribution, and Trends of Mixedwoods in the Northern United States1 Lance A
    881 ARTICLE Contemporary status, distribution, and trends of mixedwoods in the northern United States1 Lance A. Vickers, Benjamin O. Knapp, John M. Kabrick, Laura S. Kenefic, Anthony W. D’Amato, Christel C. Kern, David A. MacLean, Patricia Raymond, Kenneth L. Clark, Daniel C. Dey, and Nicole S. Rogers Abstract: As interest in managing and maintaining mixedwood forests in the northern United States (US) grows, so does the importance of understanding their abundance and distribution. We analyzed Forest Inventory and Analysis data for insights into mixedwood forests spanning 24 northern US states from Maine south to Maryland and westward to Kansas and North Dakota. Mixedwoods, i.e., forests with both hardwoods and softwoods present but neither exceeding 75%–80% of composition, comprise more than 19 million hectares and more than one-quarter of the northern US forest. They are most common in the Adirondack – New England, Laurentian, and Northeast ecological provinces but also occur elsewhere in hardwood-dominated ecological provinces. These mixtures are common even within forest types nominally categorized as either hardwood or softwood. The most common hardwoods within those mixtures were species of Quercus and Acer,and the most common softwoods were species of Pinus, Tsuga,andJuniperus. Although mixedwoods exhibited stability in total area during our analysis period, hardwood saplings were prominent, suggesting widespread potential for eventual shifts to hardwood dominance in the absence of disturbances that favor regeneration of the softwood component. Our analyses sug- gest that while most mixedwood plots remained mixedwoods, harvesting commonly shifts mixedwoods to either hard- wood- or softwood-dominated cover types, but more specific information is needed to understand the causes of these shifts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cass Lake 04-0030-00 BELTRAMI COUNTY
    Cass Lake 04-0030-00 BELTRAMI COUNTY Lake Water Quality Summary Cass Lake is located at the city of Cass Lake, MN, and spans both Cass and Beltrami Counties. It covers 15,958 acres and is the 8th largest lake in Minnesota in terms of surface area. Cass Lake has four inlets and one outlet, which classify it as a drainage lake. Water enters Cass Lake from the Mississippi River, Kitchi Lake, Pike Bay, and a ground-fed stream in the northeast. The Mississippi River enters and exits Cass Lake. Cass Lake water levels are affected by the operation of two dams on the Mississippi River. Otter Tail Power Company operates a dam upstream, just below Stump Lake. At the Cass Lake outlet is Knutson Dam, owned and operated by the U.S. Forest Service. A Superfund cleanup site exists on Pike Bay near the south side of Cass Lake. Water quality data have been collected on Cass Lake at various sites from 1979-2015 (Tables 2 & 3). These data show that the lake is mesotrophic (TSI = 44) with moderately clear water conditions most of the summer and excellent recreational opportunities. Cass Lake does not have an association. Its water quality is managed by the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe Division of Resource Management. Table 1. Cass Lake location and key physical characteristics. Location Data Physical Characteristics MN Lake ID: 04-0030-00 Surface area (acres): 15,958.26 County: Beltrami Littoral area (acres): 7,597.73 Ecoregion: Northern Lakes and Forests % Littoral area: 47.61 Major Drainage Basin: Mississippi R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campground Host Volunteer Program
    CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM THE CAMPGROUND HOST VOLUNTEER PROGRAM MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 1 CAMPGROUND HOST PROGRAM DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION Introduction This packet is designed to give you the information necessary to apply for a campground host position. Applications will be accepted all year but must be received at least 30 days in advance of the time you wish to serve as a host. Please send completed applications to the park manager for the park or forest campground in which you are interested. Addresses are listed at the back of this brochure. General questions and inquiries may be directed to: Campground Host Coordinator DNR-Parks and Recreation 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4039 651-259-5607 [email protected] Principal Duties and Responsibilities During the period from May to October, the volunteer serves as a "live in" host at a state park or state forest campground for at least a four-week period. The primary responsibility is to assist campers by answering questions and explaining campground rules in a cheerful and helpful manner. Campground Host volunteers should be familiar with state park and forest campground rules and should become familiar with local points of interest and the location where local services can be obtained. Volunteers perform light maintenance work around the campground such as litter pickup, sweeping, stocking supplies in toilet buildings and making emergency minor repairs when possible. Campground Host volunteers may be requested to assist in the naturalist program by posting and distributing schedules, publicizing programs or helping with programs. Volunteers will set an example by being model campers, practicing good housekeeping at all times in and around the host site, and by observing all rules.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota State Parks.Pdf
    Table of Contents 1. Afton State Park 4 2. Banning State Park 6 3. Bear Head Lake State Park 8 4. Beaver Creek Valley State Park 10 5. Big Bog State Park 12 6. Big Stone Lake State Park 14 7. Blue Mounds State Park 16 8. Buffalo River State Park 18 9. Camden State Park 20 10. Carley State Park 22 11. Cascade River State Park 24 12. Charles A. Lindbergh State Park 26 13. Crow Wing State Park 28 14. Cuyuna Country State Park 30 15. Father Hennepin State Park 32 16. Flandrau State Park 34 17. Forestville/Mystery Cave State Park 36 18. Fort Ridgely State Park 38 19. Fort Snelling State Park 40 20. Franz Jevne State Park 42 21. Frontenac State Park 44 22. George H. Crosby Manitou State Park 46 23. Glacial Lakes State Park 48 24. Glendalough State Park 50 25. Gooseberry Falls State Park 52 26. Grand Portage State Park 54 27. Great River Bluffs State Park 56 28. Hayes Lake State Park 58 29. Hill Annex Mine State Park 60 30. Interstate State Park 62 31. Itasca State Park 64 32. Jay Cooke State Park 66 33. John A. Latsch State Park 68 34. Judge C.R. Magney State Park 70 1 35. Kilen Woods State Park 72 36. Lac qui Parle State Park 74 37. Lake Bemidji State Park 76 38. Lake Bronson State Park 78 39. Lake Carlos State Park 80 40. Lake Louise State Park 82 41. Lake Maria State Park 84 42. Lake Shetek State Park 86 43.
    [Show full text]
  • Map 2, Lake Superior State Water Trail from Knife River to Split Rock
    ROUTE DESCRIPTION - River miles 26 to 60 (34 miles) (0.0 at Minnesota Entrance – Duluth Lift Bridge). 48.0 Private resort. [47° 07.135' N / 91° 30.265' W] 57.7 Little Two Harbors at Split Rock Lighthouse State Park. Access to park and lighthouse, a MAP 2 - Knife River to Split Rock Lighthouse State Park 51.0 Gooseberry Falls State Park and Gooseberry Minnesota Historic Site. Trailer access, parking, River. Carry-in access, parking, campground, 2 campground, picnic area and trails. 26.5 Knife River Marina. Access at launch area. watercraft campsites (available on a first-come, [47° 11.865' N / 91° 22.620' W] Parking, toilets. [46° 56.705' N / 91° 46.950' W] first-served basis), picnic area and trails. [47° 08.560' N / 91° 27.500' W] 59.0 Gold Rock Point. Wreck of the Madeira, driven 26.6 Knife River Beach. Carry-in access, rest area, ashore in 1905, lies scattered on the bottom in parking, toilet. Sand and pebble beach. 53.0 Thompson Beach. Four watercraft campsites 10 to 100' of water with portions clearly visible [46° 56.785' N / 91° 46.845' W] and rest area, toilet. No fires. First-come, in calm water. A popular recreational diving site, first-served. [47° 09.480' N / 91° 26.230' W] please be alert to divers in the water. Rest area 30.2 Private resort. Rocky Beach. on small beach nearby. No facilities. [46° 59.025' N / 91° 44.170' W] 53.8 Twin Points. Rest area, trailer access, parking. [47° 12.410' N / 91° 21.520' W] No camping permitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Shipping Study
    UNCLASSIFIED Great Lakes Shipping Study This page intentionally left blank. National Protection and Programs Directorate Integrated Analysis Task Force Homeland Infrastructure Threat and Risk Analysis Center January 13, 2014 UNCLASSIFIED Executive Summary The Great Lakes St. Lawrence Seaway (GLSLS) system is a vast, interconnected series of navigable waterways, with intersecting modes of transportation and landscapes. The enormity and importance of the GLSLS system cannot be overstated as the region is critically dependent upon it; therefore, it is vital to understand the nature of the system, the industries that rely upon it, its economic impact, and major commodities that flow through the GLSLS. This study provides an overview of the GLSLS system, focusing on geography, system infrastructure, economic and employment data derived from the GLSLS, and detailed analysis of three key commodities: iron ore, steel, and refined petroleum products. The GLSLS, which borders eight states and spans 2,300 miles, comprises Lake Superior, Lakes Michigan and Huron, Lake Erie, Montreal-Lake Ontario, and the Saint Lawrence Seaway, as well as the channels that connect these navigable sections. U.S. and Canadian companies and industries rely on the GLSLS for low-cost, long-distance transportation of raw materials and finished goods. In 2010, U.S. and Canadian companies that depend on the GLSLS for moving cargo reported revenues of over $30 billion, more than half of which was generated in the United States. The GLSLS is also responsible for the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs, providing direct employment for mariners, many types of port employees, and support positions within the companies, as well as creating indirect jobs that result from the spending power of the previously mentioned workers.
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Impacts of Climate Change on Vulnerability of Brook Trout in Lake Superior’S Tributary Streams of Minnesota
    Assessing Impacts of Climate Change on Vulnerability of Brook Trout in Lake Superior’s Tributary Streams of Minnesota Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth William Herb, St. Anthony Falls Laboratory, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis Meijun Cai, Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth Report to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, upon completion of contract # MN DNR/1229G WO 47578 Natural Resources Research Institute technical report number NRRI/TR-2013/05 1 Executive Summary Water temperature is generally considered one of the primary physical habitat parameter determining the suitability of stream habitat for fish species, with effects on the mortality, metabolism, growth, behavior, and reproduction of individuals. In this study we assessed the potential threats of climate change on stream temperatures and flow regimes in Lake Superior tributary streams in Minnesota, USA. The study included deterministic models for stream flow and temperature of three study streams (Amity Creek, Baptism River, Knife River), and regional (empirical) models for specific flow and temperature parameters to give better spatial coverage of the region. Information on stream flow, stream temperature, and land cover was used to develop a brook trout presence/absence model to understand the current pattern of distribution of brook trout and predict future distributions under future climate. The hydrology of north shore streams is mainly driven by air temperature and precipitation. Historical air temperatures in the region have a significant upward trend, particularly since 1980. Global climate model (GCM) outputs project a continued increasing trend in air temperature, with an increase in mean annual air temperature of 2 to 3 °C by 2089.
    [Show full text]