Morales 1 Written for CLA 393 (Honors Thesis Writing) Submitted
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Morales 1 Written for CLA 393 (Honors Thesis Writing) Submitted to the Undergraduate Writing Colloquium in the category of Humanities The Ponderous, Portentous Prick: Sociopolitical Invective in the Mamurra Poems of Catullus Mario G. Morales Class of 2011, B.A. History/Classics Morales 2 Analysis of Invective in the Mamurra Poems Nowhere is the sociopolitical dimension of Catullan poetry more present than in the poems attacking Mamurra, or, as Catullus eventually settles on calling him, Mentula. By all accounts a capable officer historically, Mamurra becomes a contrapositional figure to the speaker of the poems, whether that speaker is Catullus himself or a persona created in order to reinforce the invective character of the poems. The hyperbolic rhetoric used to describe his sexual, financial, and literary exploits further caricatures him, making him a near-farcical exaggeration of the quintessential vir – the ambitious and efficient man every good Roman aspired to be. This makes him the absolute opposite of Catullus, or at least of the Catullan persona, whose literary, intellectual, and moral concerns set him against the traditional idea of Roman virility. The obvious question to settle, then, is who Mamurra was in the first place. He was a member of the Roman equestrian class, hailing from Formiae, a town along the Appian Way and the site of Cicero's assassination in 43.1 In being of noble birth and a Roman citizen, he already presented an opposite figure to Catullus, who hailed from Transpadane Gaul, a province that would not acquire full Roman status until 49. Furthermore, the province was also known for a high percentage of settlers from Hellenized central Italy. Wiseman suggests that this Greek influence, combined with the traditional morality of rural communities, heavily influenced Catullus' poetry, not simply in his choice to adopt Hellenized forms but in the moral values he espouses through his invective.2 Since Catullus served as a staff officer to Memmius Piso, however, he must have at least obtained or received Roman citizenship, probably through his 1 Green, Peter. The Poems of Catullus: A Bilingual Edition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2005. p. 289. 2 Wiseman, T.P. Catullus and His World: a Reappraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985. pp. 110- 111. Morales 3 father's service as a magistrate in Verona.3 During his career, Mamurra served as an engineer to two of the triumvirs, first to Pompey during the Mithridatic War (66), then to Julius Caesar, both in Spain (61) and Gaul (58). During the latter campaign, he was made Caesar's praefectus fabrum (i.e., chief engineer) and performed efficiently enough to build a 1,500-foot bridge across the Rhine in ten days.4 His efficiency in service resulted in his amassing enough wealth to scandalize Cicero,5 though in Catullus he is most commonly portrayed as the decoctor Formianus – that is, the “bankrupt from Formiae”6 – in contrast to his general image of a wealthy young officer. Once again, this stands in direct opposition to Catullus, who, despite his service on Memmius Piso's staff in Bithynia, was apparently unable to acquire any impressive wealth,7 and who, unless emancipated from his father, would have been in potestate and thus living in Rome on an allowance.8 While Catullus seems to have resigned himself to poverty, such as in his humorous invitation to Fabullus in 13, he paints Mamurra as an insatiable machine, seeking only wealth that he then hastens to disintegrate. As Fordyce notes, however, Caesar was unlikely to have appointed such a spendthrift to serve as his chief engineer. The fact that Mamurra served as praefectus fabrum, particularly during a campaign like Caesar's conquest of Gaul, thus suggests that Catullus' 3 Konstan, David. "The Contemporary Political Context." A Companion to Catullus. Ed. Marilyn B. Skinner. Chichester: Blackwell, 2011. p. 72. 4 Green, p. 296. 5 Cic., Att. 7.7.6.: “Annorum enim decem imperium et ita latum placet? Placet igitur etiam me expulsum […] et Labieni divitiae et Mamurrae placent et Balbi horti et Tusculanum.” (“Do the ten years of command please [me], or that it was so borne? Then it pleases me to be exiled […] and the riches of Labienus and Mamurra please me, and the gardens of Balbus and his Tusculanian [estate].” Cited in Green, p. 296; Konstan, p. 74. 6 Catul. 41.4, 43.5. 7 Catul. 10.8-13. 8 Green, p. 2. Morales 4 depiction of the man is, at best, biased.9 At worst, it would have been bald hypocrisy: while Catullus righteously lobs invective verses at Mamurra for attempting to enrich himself through campaigning, he had before attacked Memmius Piso, his own superior, for preventing him from doing exactly that.10 It is hard to believe that Catullus would have been incognizant of the dissonance. Fordyce suggests that Catullus most likely took offense not to Mamurra's actual conduct or his political alignment with Caesar and Pompey. Rather, Mamurra attracted the poet's ire “by cutting a figure in society in Rome and in Cisalpine Gaul,” the latter of which becomes the provincia mentioned in 43.6.11 In other words, what Catullus found objectionable was Mamurra's own social persona, and refined his own persona in order to counter it. The poems that attack him, whether addressed to him or to his various relations, emphasize the contrasts between their author and their target. The Catullan portrait of Mamurra paints him as an undiluted appetite with no thought for the consequences of his licentiousness. He is relentless in his pursuit of wealth and sex, both markers of masculine power among Roman men involved in politics. Thus, to Catullus, he became much more than “a pretentious upstart,”12 though that may certainly have been the basis of the character who appears in the poems. He becomes instead an absurd, near- comedic exaggeration of the Roman vir. Catullus' barbs, written in the voice of a man demonstrably a failure in the same sort of endeavors, thus serve to mock this hyperbolic figure as an example of ambition gone wild. Catullus first mentions Mamurra in poem 29, as part of a longer iambic work usually 9 Fordyce, C.J. Catullus: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961. p. 160. 10 Fordyce, ibid. 11 Fordyce, ibid. 12 Fordyce, ibid. Morales 5 thought to be addressed to Caesar and Pompey. Quis hoc potest videre, quis potest pati, nisi impudicus et vorax et aleo, Mamurram habere quod Comata Gallia habebat ante et ultima Britannia? cinaede Romule haec videbis et feres? et ille nunc superbus et superfluens perambulabit omnium cubilia, ut albulus columbus aut Adoneus? cinaede Romule, haec videbis et feres? es impudicus et vorax et aleo. eone nomine, imperator unice, fuisti in ultima occidentis insula, ut ista vestra diffututa mentula ducenties comesset aut trecenties? quid est alid sinistra liberalitas? parum expatrauit an parum (h)elluatus est? paterna prima lancinata sunt bona, secunda praeda Pontica, inde tertia Hibera, quam scit amnis aurifer Tagus: nunc Galliae timetur et Britanniae. quid hunc malum fouetis? aut quid hic potest nisi uncta devorare patrimonia? eone nomine urbis o piissimi, socer generque, perdidistis omnia? Who can see this, who can suffer it, unless he were shameless, voracious, a gambler, that Mamurra holds what Transalpine Gaul and faraway Britain had before? Faggot Romulus, will you see this and put up with it? Now he, haughty and overflowing, will pass around the marriage beds of all, like some little white dove or Adoneus? Faggot Romulus, will you see this and put up with it? You are shameless, and voracious, and a gambler. Was this why, O generalissimo, you were in the world's westernmost island, so this thoroughly-fucked-out prick of yours would eat two hundred or three hundred times? What is it if not improper generosity? Has he not gobbled enough or gone through enough? First he tore his inheritance to pieces, then the booty of Pontus, from there, third the Spanish treasure, as the gold-bearing river Tagus knows. Now he is feared in Gaul and Britain. Why do you cherish this evil man? What can he do except swallow oiled patrimonies? Was this why, you holier-than-thou citizens, father-in-law, son-in-law, destroyed everything? Written in a style reminiscent of Archilochean iambics, particularly at its opening, 29 is Morales 6 one of the more direct invective pieces in the Catullan corpus. Moreover, as the first poem to make any mention of Mamurra in the corpus, 29 serves as an introduction both to him specifically and to Catullus' more explicitly political poetry in general, and establishes Mamurra as the dominant character among those that populate this thematic division of his work.13 Elements first essayed in this poem recur throughout the later corpus. First, the word mentula will become directly associated with Mamurra in the epigrams. Second, the theme of Mamurra as an unstoppable appetite, always in pursuit of sex or treasure and careless of the cost he incurs in acquiring them, will appear in two different sets of poems. Mamurra's profligate habits14 lead Catullus to nickname him “bankrupt from Formiae” in poems 41 and 43, hurled at his mistress, Ameana. Much later in the published order of the corpus, when he is first addressed by the nickname Mentula, he is attacked for his adulterous habits,15 for his lack of poetic skill,16 and for the contrast between the wealth of his property and his inability to properly exploit it.17 The stark language of vituperation Catullus utilizes in this poem is difficult to overstate. First, and most obviously, Mamurra's relentless desire for money and land cast as an unfavorable reflection upon Caesar, to say the least.