DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix I: Community Impact Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix I: Community Impact Assessment Appendix I: Community Impact Assessment and EJ Analysis Community Impact Assessment and Environmental Justice Analysis Technical Report Sherman Minton Renewal Project Indiana Department of Transportation April 10, 2020 Des. No. 1702255 Appendix I: Community Impact Assessment I 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ES. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................... 6 ES.1 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................... 7 ES.2 Public Perception.....................................................................................................10 ES.3 Existing Traffic Conditions .........................................................................................10 ES.4 Proposed Action and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Options ..........................................11 ES.5 Project Study Area and Timeline ................................................................................14 ES.6 CIA and EJ Methodologies .........................................................................................15 ES.7 Public Involvement Effort and EJ Outreach ..................................................................17 ES.8 Community Profiles and Demographics .......................................................................18 ES.9 CIA and EJ Impacts ...................................................................................................21 ES.10 CIA/EJ Findings and MOT Recommendations ...............................................................29 1. Project Purpose and Need ................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project Overview ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Need ............................................................................................................ 4 1.3 Project Purpose .......................................................................................................10 2. Sherman Minton Bridge and Public Perception ...................................................................11 2.1 Emergency Temporary Closure - Public Experience .......................................................12 2.2 Emergency Temporary Closure - Contributing Factors ...................................................13 2.3 What Is Different Now ..............................................................................................13 2.4 Existing Traffic Conditions .........................................................................................16 3. Proposed Action and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT).............................................................19 3.1 Project Study area and Timeline.................................................................................19 3.2 Proposed Action ......................................................................................................19 3.3 Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Options ........................................................................22 4. CIA and EJ Methodologies................................................................................................25 4.1 Regulatory Framework .............................................................................................26 4.2 CIA Methodology .....................................................................................................26 4.3 EJ Analysis Methodology...........................................................................................27 4.3.1 Determining the Presence of EJ Populations and Establishing EJ Areas of Concern .........28 4.3.2 Environmental Justice Outreach Plan.......................................................................31 4.3.3 Determining the Applicability of “Disproportionally High and Adverse Effects” ..............32 5 Public Involvement Effort and EJ Outreach .........................................................................33 5.1 Public Outreach Efforts .............................................................................................33 5.2 General Public Involvement Feedback.........................................................................34 5.3 EJ outreach Feedback ...............................................................................................36 i Des. No. 1702255 Appendix I: Community Impact Assessment I 2 6 Community Profiles ........................................................................................................37 6.1 General Population and Demographic Characteristics ...................................................38 6.2 Floyd County, IN ......................................................................................................46 6.2.1 New Albany .........................................................................................................46 6.3 Clark County, IN.......................................................................................................47 6.3.1 Clarksville, IN .......................................................................................................47 6.3.2 Jeffersonville, IN...................................................................................................48 6.4 Louisville and Jefferson County, KY .............................................................................50 6.5 EJ-Specific Demographics In Project Study Area............................................................53 7. CIA and EJ Impacts ..........................................................................................................59 7.1 Traffic, Diversions, congestion, and Travel Time ...........................................................60 7.1.1 Systemwide Traffic and Diversions ..........................................................................62 7.1.2 Systemwide Congestion.........................................................................................68 7.1.2 Local Streets ........................................................................................................79 7.1.2.1 Local Access to the Interstate .............................................................................79 7.1.2.2 Local Congestion ...............................................................................................83 7.1.3 Trip Travel Distance and Time.................................................................................87 7.1.4 Traffic, Diversions, Congestion, and Travel Time Findings ...........................................88 7.2 Transit and Rideshare ...............................................................................................89 7.2.1 Effects on TARC Routes .........................................................................................89 7.2.2 Effects on TARC Riders ..........................................................................................95 7.2.3 Transit and Rideshare Summary..............................................................................96 7.3 Economic Impacts ....................................................................................................97 7.3.1 Total User Costs for Through-Trips and Local Trips by MOT Duration............................97 7.3.2 Comparison of Local Trip Costs for Non-EJ and EJ Populations .....................................98 7.3.3 Economic Impacts to Local Businesses ................................................................... 100 7.3.4 Economic Impacts - Summary............................................................................... 101 7.4 Social Impacts ....................................................................................................... 103 7.4.1 Access and Mobility ............................................................................................ 103 7.4.2 Community Cohesion .......................................................................................... 104 7.4.3 Quality of Life .................................................................................................... 105 7.4.3.1 Air Quality...................................................................................................... 105 7.4.3.2 Noise Impacts................................................................................................. 107 7.4.4 Special Populations ............................................................................................. 110 7.4.5 Social Impacts Summary ...................................................................................... 110 7.5 Safety factors ........................................................................................................ 111 7.5.1 Safety Factors Summary ...................................................................................... 112 7.6 EJ Findings and MOT Recommendations ................................................................... 113 ii Des. No. 1702255 Appendix I: Community Impact Assessment I 3 7.6.1 Environmental Justice Findings ............................................................................. 113 7.6.2 Overall MOT Option Recommendations ................................................................. 116 7.6.3 Preferred Alternative Recommended MOT............................................................. 117 8. Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Measures..........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Top 10 Bridges by State.Xlsx
    Top 10 Most Traveled U.S. Structurally Deficient Bridges by State, 2015 2015 Year Daily State State County Type of Bridge Location Status in 2014 Status in 2013 Built Crossings Rank 1 Alabama Jefferson 1970 136,580 Urban Interstate I65 over U.S.11,RR&City Streets at I65 2nd Ave. to 2nd Ave.No Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 2 Alabama Mobile 1964 87,610 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Halls Mill Creek at 2.2 mi E US 90 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 3 Alabama Jefferson 1972 77,385 Urban Interstate I-59/20 over US 31,RRs&City Streets at Bham Civic Center Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 4 Alabama Mobile 1966 73,630 Urban Interstate I-10 WB & EB over Southern Drain Canal at 3.3 mi E Jct SR 163 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 5 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over D Olive Stream at 1.5 mi E Jct US 90 & I-10 Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 6 Alabama Baldwin 1969 53,560 Rural Interstate I-10 over Joe S Branch at 0.2 mi E US 90 Not Deficient Not Deficient 7 Alabama Jefferson 1968 41,990 Urban Interstate I 59/20 over Arron Aronov Drive at I 59 & Arron Aronov Dr. Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 8 Alabama Mobile 1964 41,490 Rural Interstate I-10 over Warren Creek at 3.2 mi E Miss St Line Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 9 Alabama Jefferson 1936 39,620 Urban other principal arterial US 78 over Village Ck & Frisco RR at US 78 & Village Creek Structurally Deficient Structurally Deficient 10 Alabama Mobile 1967 37,980 Urban Interstate
    [Show full text]
  • Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide
    Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide A Complete Compendium Of RV Dump Stations Across The USA Publiished By: Covenant Publishing LLC 1201 N Orange St. Suite 7003 Wilmington, DE 19801 Copyrighted Material Copyright 2010 Covenant Publishing. All rights reserved worldwide. Ultimate RV Dump Station Guide Page 2 Contents New Mexico ............................................................... 87 New York .................................................................... 89 Introduction ................................................................. 3 North Carolina ........................................................... 91 Alabama ........................................................................ 5 North Dakota ............................................................. 93 Alaska ............................................................................ 8 Ohio ............................................................................ 95 Arizona ......................................................................... 9 Oklahoma ................................................................... 98 Arkansas ..................................................................... 13 Oregon ...................................................................... 100 California .................................................................... 15 Pennsylvania ............................................................ 104 Colorado ..................................................................... 23 Rhode Island ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Maintenance Painting on the I-64 Riverside Expressway in Louisville
    ResearchReport KTC-00-10 KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CENTER CollegeofEngineering EXPERIMENTALMAINTENANCEPAINTING ONTHEI-64RIVERSIDEEXPRESSWAY INLOUISVILLE UNIVERSITYOFKENTUCKY UniversityofKentucky CollegeofEngineering KENTUCKYTRANSPORTATIONCENTER OurMission Weprovideservicestothetransportationcommunity throughresearch,technologytransferandeducation. Wecreateandparticipateinpartnershipstopromote safeandeffectivetransportationsystems. WeValue... Teamwork--ListeningandCommunicating,AlongwithCourtesyandRespectforOthers HonestyandEthicalBehavior DeliveringtheHighestQualityProductsandServices ContinuousImprovementinAllThatWeDo Formoreinformationoracompletepublicationlist,contactusat: KentuckyTransportationCenter 176RaymondBuilding UniversityofKentucky Lexington,Kentucky40506-0281 (859)257-4513 (859)257-1815(FAX) 1-800-432-0719 www.engr.uky.edu/ktc [email protected] TheUniversityofKentuckyisanEqualOpportunityOrganization Research Report KTC-00-10 EXPERIMENTAL MAINTENANCE PAINTING ON THE I-64 RIVERSIDE EXPRESSWAY IN LOUISVILLE By Theodore Hopwood II Associate Engineer, Research Bobby Meade Research Investigator And Sudhir Palle Engineer Associate Senior, Research Kentucky Transportation Center College of Engineering University of Kentucky Lexington, Kentucky In cooperation with Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Commonwealth of Kentucky And The Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents
    [Show full text]
  • September 1936 Volume Xx Published Quarterly by The
    SEPTEMBER 1936 VOLUME XX NUMBER 1 PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN MMHIttllin*|MIMH«IHIIMHIHIIHIHnilllllHH«MIIHIIIIMIHMIHMIIIIMIMMUMHIIMIIHMH»MHMUMMIHItllH»HHIIMMI THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WISCONSIN is a state- aided corporation whose function is the cultivation and en- couragement of the historical interests of the State. To this end it invites your cooperation; membership is open to all, whether residents of Wisconsin or elsewhere. The dues of annual mem- bers are three dollars, payable in advance; of life members, thirty dollars, payable once only. Subject to certain exceptions, mem- bers receive the publications of the Society, the cost of producing which far exceeds the membership fee. This is rendered possible by reason of the aid accorded the Society by the State. Of the work and ideals of the Society this magazine affords, it is be- lieved, a fair example. With limited means, much has already been accomplished; with ampler funds more might be achieved. So far as is known, not a penny entrusted to the Society has ever been lost or misapplied. Property may be willed to the Society in entire confidence that any trust it assumes will be scrupulously executed. »tiiitiiinimiiiMHimiiiiii»iiMiiitiintiniiimiiiiimiii»»MmiiMm«iiMiiii timii iiiiiiiiiiiimitmimiimmimiiii THE WISCONSIN MAGAZINE OF HISTORY is published quarterly by the Society, at 116 E. Main St., Evansville, Wisconsin, in September, Decem- ber, March, and June, and is distributed to its members and exchanges; others who so desire may receive it for the annual subscription of three dollars, payable in advance; single numbers may be had for seventy-five cents.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Awards & Achievements
    100 North Senate Avenue PHONE: (317) 232-5533 Michael R. Pence, Governor Room N758 FAX: (317) 232-5118 Karl B. Browning, Commissioner Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 2013 Awards & Achievements American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) of Indiana Engineering Excellence Awards The American Council of Engineering Companies of Indiana recognizes outstanding engineering achievements based on uniqueness and originality, technical complexity, social and economic value, and public awareness. Award Year: 2013 – Grand Project Award – National Recognition Award Recipient: INDOT’s Sherman Minton Bridge Project Description: The Sherman Minton Bridge, which carries Interstate 64 over the Ohio River between southern Indiana and Louisville, Kentucky, reopened to traffic Feb. 17 after emergency repairs were completed two months sooner than originally estimated and 12 days ahead of the most recent scheduled target date. American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA), Indiana Chapter 2013 Excellence in Concrete Pavement Award The ACPA Annual Awards for Excellence in Concrete Pavement are designed to honor quality concrete pavements constructed in the United States and Canada each year. The awards program encourages high-quality workmanship in every concrete pavement project and serves as a forum for sharing information about highly successful projects. Award Year: 2013 Recipient: INDOT Project Description: I-69 New Construction, Section 3, Contract 8 & 9, Daviess County; SR 25 Delphi to Lafayette, Tippecanoe & Carroll Counties; Maplecrest Road Extension, Allen County American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) National Recognition Award Award Year: 2013 Recipient: INDOT’s Sherman Minton Bridge Project Description: The Sherman Minton Bridge, which carries Interstate 64 over the Ohio River between southern Indiana and Louisville, Kentucky, reopened to traffic Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • E-News and Updates December 15Th, 2016
    December 15th, 2016 E-News and Updates HERI RYANT AMILTON ISTRICT OUNCILWOMAN C B H , D 5 C Louisville selected to receive $29.5 million HUD grant to jumpstart Russell revitalization Louisville is receiving a $29.5 million implementation grant through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Choice Neighborhoods Initiative program. The federal funding is expected to leverage more than $200 million in private, foundation, nonprofit and public dollars to fully implement ‘Vision Russell’, a comprehensive transformation plan for the neighborhood, starting with a phased deconstruction and redevelopment of the Cheri Bryant Hamilton Beecher Terrace public housing site. Vision Russell was developed over the past District 5 Councilwoman two years by Louisville Metro Government, the Louisville Metro Housing 601 West Jefferson Street Authority (LMHA) and community residents, agencies and leaders. City Hall, 3rd Floor Louisville, KY 40202 Vision Russell efforts will focus on several key components in transforming (502) 574-1105 the neighborhood, including: E-mail: Tearing down and redeveloping Beecher Terrace into a sustainable, [email protected] multi-generational, mixed-income, mixed-use development; Myra Friend-Ellis Developing one-for-one, off-site replacement housing for Beecher Terrace Legislative Assistant residents in their neighborhoods of choice; (502) 574-3905 Increasing safety and security; E-mail: Re-creating strong retail and service centers within the neighborhood; [email protected] Improving educational and health outcomes for Beecher Terrace and Fax: (502) 574-2560 Russell households; Improving community connectivity Written By: Sherman H. Smith Jr For more information please contact [email protected] Tim Barry at 502-569-3420 or by email at [email protected] Web address: http://www.louisvilleky.gov/ district 5 Please feel free to copy any of this information for use at your meetings or in your newsletters.
    [Show full text]
  • NHS Listing by Route Number
    01-JUL-21 National Highway System (NHS) Page: 1 XORP HIS PROD Primary Routes PL_NHS Route Begin End Route County Description MilePnt MilePnt Length FC R_U ------------ ------------ ---------------------------------------- -------- -------- --------- ------------ ----- KY 1 Carter From I-64 to KY 9 11.502 12.009 .507 Princ Art Urban ************ --------- sum .507 KY 4 Fayette From US 27 (Nicholasville Road) via New .000 9.324 9.324 Expressway Urban Circle Road to KY 922 (Newtown Pike) Fayette From KY 922 (Newtown Pike) via New 9.324 14.843 5.519 Princ Art Urban Circle Road to US 25 (Richmond Road) Fayette From US 25 (Richmond Road) via New 14.843 19.283 4.440 Expressway Urban Circle Road to US 27 (Nicholasville Road) ************ --------- sum 19.283 KY 7 Letcher From KY 15 to KY 15 13.497 14.157 .660 Princ Art Rural ************ --------- sum .660 KY 8 -NC Kenton From Crescent Avenue to Garrard Street 6.434 7.414 .980 Princ Art Urban ************ --------- sum .980 KY 8 Campbell From Kenton County line to US 27 North .000 .683 .683 Princ Art Urban Greenup From KY 8 Spur to US 23 at the south 2.000 3.023 1.023 Princ Art Rural limits of the U.S. Grant Bridge Kenton From 4th Street to Campbell County line 6.434 7.662 1.228 Princ Art Urban ************ --------- sum 2.934 KY 8X Campbell US 27 to I-471 .000 .513 .513 Princ Art Urban ************ --------- sum .513 KY 8S Greenup From KY 8 via Carl Perkins Bridge to .000 .610 .610 Princ Art Rural north limits of the bridge structure ************ --------- sum .610 KY 9 Bracken From Mason County
    [Show full text]
  • 317-234-8926 [email protected]
    Scott.A.Milkey From: Clift, Mckenzie C Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 6:04 PM To: Lloyd, Matthew;Hodgin, Stephanie Subject: RE: transcrip Attachments: Governor, Rafael Interview Transcription.docx Yes - see attached. McKenzie Clift Communications Specialist Office of Governor Michael R. Pence Office: 317-234-8926 [email protected] From: Lloyd, Matthew Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 6:00 PM To: Hodgin, Stephanie <[email protected]>; Clift, Mckenzie C <[email protected]> Subject: transcrip Can you send me script from Rafael interview? Transcription This Week Interview with Governor Mike Pence – Airing 10/18 Rafael Sanchez, RTV 6: Governor Mike Pence: Governor, thank you for joining us. Rafael Sanchez, RTV 6:You bet. You announced a major road program which you say will not, in any way, raiGovernorse taxes. Mike How Pence:is that possible? Well, it’s a real testament to the strong, fiscal responsibility that Indiana’s demonstrated in recent years. Look, we have one of the strongest balance sheets in the country. We have a growing economy. We have record employment in the state of Indiana and the lowest unemployment rate in the Midwest. That’s all created an environment where, in the end of the last fiscal year, we actually ended up with near record reserves in the bank. So, as we were looking at the priorities of the coming session and the General Assembly, I knew it would be possible for us to invest in the kind of preservation of our infrastructure, of roads and bridges, across the state of Indiana. By leveraging our fiscal strength without having to raise taxes on Hoosier motorists and taxpayers.Rafael Sanchez, RTV 6: We’re talking about $1 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2025 Transportation Improvement Program
    ADOPTED TDB FY 2020 - FY 2025 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN Metropolitan Planning Area DRAFT The Kentuckiana Regional Planning & Development Agency is the federally designated Metropolitan Planning Organization for a five-county region in two states: Clark and Floyd counties in Indiana; and Bullitt, Jefferson, and Oldham counties in Kentucky. FUNDING DISCLAIMER | This report has been prepared in cooperation with or with financial assistance from all or several of the following public entities: Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration, Kentucky Transportation Cabinet, Indiana Department of Transportation, Transit Authority of River City, and local governments in the KIPDA region. This financial assistance notwithstanding, the contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the funding agencies. Accuracy of the information presented herein is the responsibility of the Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency, based upon project information submitted by sponsoring agencies. 11520 Commonwealth Drive Louisville, KY 40299 TITLE VI COMPLIANCE | KIPDA fully complies with Title VI of the Civil DRAFTRights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, Executive Order 12898 on Environmental Justice, and related nondiscrimination 502.266.6144 statutes and regulations in all programs and activities. KIPDA’s website, www.kipda.org, may be translated into multiple languages. Publications 502.266.5047 FAX and other public documents can be made available in alternative 800.962.8408 IN TDD languages and formats, if requested. KIPDA public meetings are always held in ADA-accessible facilities, and in transit-accessible locations when 800.648.6056 KY TDD possible. Auxiliary services can be provided to individuals who submit a request at least seven days prior to a public meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • MAASTO Annual Report
    DRAFT i A letter from the president Greetings — I am pleased to present this 2017 annual report highlighting the achievements and innovations by our member states over the past year. The 10 states that comprise MAASTO are accomplishing some truly impressive things that will further elevate the prominent role we play in supporting our nation’s economy and enhancing the quality of life for citizens who call our region home. One thing is clear — as technology rapidly advances and the need deepens for identifying creative solutions for new and old problems alike, it is more important than ever that we work together to share best practices and inspire innovation. In that spirit, 43 individuals from across the region met in Chicago this spring for a summit on intermodal freight with an ultimate goal of strengthening the Midwest economy and improving the mobility of goods and people. A lot of discussion centered on opportunities for collabora - tion, as well as leveraging emerging technology and harmonizing regulations that vary by state and therefore affect freight movement. An overview of the summit begins on page 4. This report also highlights MAASTO’s effort to improve freight network safety and efficiency by providing truckers, dispatchers and their companies with real-time parking information. This is America’s first multistate effort of its kind. I am confident you will be impressed with the progress this partnership has achieved over the past year. We have a lot to be proud of and clearly can achieve great things together. Experiencing that level of partnership has been one of the most rewarding aspects of my role as MAASTO president.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisville Metro Council
    Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Louisville Metro Recommended Executive Budget Greg Fischer, Mayor Ellen Hesen, Deputy Mayor Metro Council District 1 Jessica Green District 2 Barbara Shanklin District 3 Keisha Dorsey District 4 Barbara Sexton Smith District 5 Donna L. Purvis District 6 David James District 7 Paula McCraney District 8 Brandon Coan District 9 Bill Hollander District 10 Pat Mulvihill District 11 Kevin Kramer District 12 Rick Blackwell District 13 Mark H. Fox District 14 Cindi Fowler District 15 Kevin Triplett District 16 Scott Reed District 17 Markus Winkler District 18 Marilyn Parker District 19 Anthony Piagentini District 20 Stuart Benson District 21 Nicole George District 22 Robin Engel District 23 James Peden District 24 Madonna Flood District 25 David Yates District 26 Brent Ackerson https://louisvilleky.gov/ i This Page Left Intentionally Blank ii https://louisvilleky.gov/ OFFICE OF THE MAYOR LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY GREG FISCHER MAYOR April 23, 2020 Dear fellow Louisvillians and Metro Council Members: The FY21 Recommended Budget is the 10th and, in many ways, most difficult budget proposal that I’ve had to present to you as our city, commonwealth, country, and planet struggle with the devastating COVID-19 pandemic. Its health and economic impacts are staggering in scope and still developing as I present this proposal. And the true impact is further complicated by an evolving federal response for providing relief to different segments of our community, economy, and Louisville Metro Government. Given the number of unknown factors, I thought it prudent to present a continuation budget, knowing that we will undoubtedly need to revise it to achieve a structurally balanced and fiscally responsible plan that represents our city values.
    [Show full text]
  • E-ZPASS TRANSPONDERS RECOMMENDED for MOTORCYCLES Tolling Is Expected to Begin Late This Year
    Contact: Mindy Peterson RiverLink spokesperson 502.595.8704, [email protected] E-ZPASS TRANSPONDERS RECOMMENDED FOR MOTORCYCLES Tolling is expected to begin late this year LOUISVILLE, Ky. (Sept. 9, 2016) – Motorcyclists who have been waiting to open RiverLink accounts have a recommendation on which transponder to use. It’s recommended that motorcyclists use a RiverLink E-ZPass transponder, and purchase a transponder holder that works best for their motorcycle and needs. Several options can be found through third-party vendors with an online search. The RiverLink E-ZPass transponder is $15 per transponder. It’s a one-time cost for the life of the transponder, with the battery expected to last at least seven years. The RiverLink E-ZPass transponder can be moved from vehicle to vehicle registered to a single account. It can also be used in all 16 E-ZPass states, primarily located in the Northeast corridor. With a transponder, the toll for motorcycles is $2 per crossing, the rate for passenger vehicles. Opening an Account RiverLink is the new, all-electronic tolling system making the Louisville – Southern Indiana Ohio River Bridges Project possible. There are no toll booths, no coin machines, no lines and no stopping. Initial toll rates range from $2-$12. The lowest toll rates are for drivers with transponders. Drivers must set up a prepaid account to get a transponder. Drivers can open a personal account online at www.RiverLink.com, by phone at 855-RIV-LINK or in person at one of two RiverLink customer service centers. The customer service centers are located at 400 East Main Street in Louisville and 103 Quartermaster Court in Jeffersonville.
    [Show full text]