Uncorrected Proof

Inﬂuence of chemical fertilizers on arsenic mobilization in the alluvial Bengal delta plain: a critical review

Md. Shajedul Islam and M. G. Mostafa* Institute of Environmental Science, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Arsenic contamination of alluvial aquifers of the Bengal delta plain causes a serious threat to human health for over 75 million people. The study aimed to explore the impacts of chemical fertilizer on arsenic mobilization in the sedimentary deposition of the alluvial Bengal delta plain. It selected ten comparatively higher affected Districts and the least affected two Divisions as a referral study site. The countrywide pooled concentration of arsenic in groundwater was 109.75 μg/L (52.59, 166.91) at a 95% conﬁdence interval, which was double the national

guideline value (50 μg/L). The analysis results showed a strong positive correlation (r 0.5) of arsenic with NO3,NH4,PO4,SO4, Ca, and K,

where a portion of those species originated from fertilizer leaching into groundwater. The results showed that PO4 played a signiﬁcant inﬂu-

ence in arsenic mobilization, but the role of NO3,SO4, and NH4 was not clear at certain lithological conditions. It also showed that clay, peat, silt-clay, and rich microbial community with sufﬁciently organic carbon loaded soils could lead to an increase in arsenic mobilization. Finally, the study observed that the overall lithological conditions are the main reason for the high arsenic load in the study area.

Key words: aquifer sediment, arsenic mobilization, Bengal delta plain, fertilizer leaching, lithology, redox reaction

HIGHLIGHTS

• The groundwater of the Bengal delta basin is highly contaminated with arsenic.

• Arsenic signiﬁcantly correlated with originated fertilizer species: NO3,NH4,PO4,SO4, Ca, and K. • Clayey, peaty, and silt-clay soil with heavy microbial and organic matters enhanced the arsenic mobilization by fertilizers leaching. • Lithological conditions are the major reasons for arsenic toxicity in groundwater.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Downloaded from http://iwaponline.com/aqua/article-pdf/doi/10.2166/aqua.2021.043/929355/jws2021043.pdf?guestAccessKey=3101e41b-c033-4c5c-a3a1-55da9dd403ae by guest on 23 September 2021 Uncorrected Proof

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 2

GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION Two Himalayan rivers, the Ganges and Brahmaputra, fall into the Bay of Bengal as a collective river transporting the largest sediment load. These rivers join in the central part of Bangladesh, with one more non-Himalayan River, the Meghna, which has created the largest delta in the world known as the Bengal delta. The Ganges–Brahmaputra River systems carry the largest sediment load in the world, about 80% of which is transported during the four rainy months (Goodbred & Kuehl 2000). More than 200 rivers and streams run through Bangladesh, with a mean annual discharge of water of about 38,000 m3/s (Haque et al. 2016), carrying over 2.4 109 MT of sediments every year before discharging into the Bay of Bengal (Talchabhadel et al. 2018). The huge alluvial sediment is carried away and deposited in basin areas and ﬁnally creates a large arable region in the world. Now this region has become the largest arsenic-affected area of the world. Bangladesh is a densely populated (2,890/mile2, positioned tenth in the world) and agrarian country in the world. Almost 90% of its lands are cultivable and 55% of the inhabitants are engaged directly in the agricultural sector (BBS 2019). Pre- sently, the application of chemical fertilizers has risen above 1,000% compared to the 1950s and has become a great threat to the environment and human health (Faruq 2018). The hydraulic conductivity of the deltaic alluvial and sandy land is sufﬁciently high and the residual portion of fertilizers can easily penetrate the topsoil by leaching. For this reason,

it can be assumed that through various chemical conversions, some water quality parameters such as pH, NO3,NO2,

PO4,NH4, K, Ca, etc. may increase in the sub-surface water. Several studies have shown that those parameters could inﬂu- ence the release of arsenic from arsenic-rich sediment in aquifers (Anawar et al. 2003; Uddin & Kurosawa 2010; Kurosawa et al. 2013). The groundwater resource is the key factor for agricultural production in this fertile delta basin. There are 97% rural and 85% of urban people who directly use raw groundwater for drinking and other household purposes in Bangladesh (Mostafa et al. 2017; BBS 2018; MICS-B 2018). But this resource is under increasing threat from over-exploitation, population growth,

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 3

rapid urbanization, and pollution from industries, domestic, and agricultural sources. Arsenic pollution is one of Bangladesh’s most severe environmental problems. According to the WHO, about 35–77 million people were regularly exposed to arsenic (50 μg/L) via drinking groundwater, and that was marked as the largest mass poisoning in history (Flanagan et al. 2012; Radfard et al. 2019; Saleh et al. 2019). The major source of arsenic in Bangladesh is geogenic since it is contained in the sediments of the shallow Holocene aquifers of the Ganges delta basin (Ravenscroft et al. 2005). Millions of shallow tube-wells were drilled in this zone to supply drinking water, but the water was contaminated with a higher concentration of arsenic. Arsenic causes harm to the human body with various carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic problems. So far, approximately 40 thousand arsenicosis patients have been identiﬁed in Bangladesh (Johnston & Motaleb 2007). Several studies have been conducted on groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh and neighboring West Bengal of India (Acharyya et al. 2000; Ravenscroft et al. 2001; UNICEF 2001; Chakraborti et al. 2010; CSISA-MI 2015; MICS-B 2018; World Bank Group 2019). Numerous studies, not only in Bangladesh but also in other Asian countries, have been conducted, including China (Sun 2004; Jiang et al. 2019; Sanjrani et al. 2019), India (Paul et al. 2015; Chandrashekhar et al. 2016; Shaji et al. 2020; Alsubih et al. 2021), Vietnam (Glodowska et al. 2020), and Japan (Hossain et al. 2016; Vongphuthone et al. 2017), where arsenic contamination in the environment reached an alarming position. However, the results have not produced the mitigation of arsenic poisoning. The mechanisms through which arsenic is released from soil or sediment into groundwater are still unknown and debatable. There are some hypotheses about the common mechanism of arsenic release in groundwater, i.e., the oxidation of arsenic-rich pyrite in the sediment, the reduction of iron oxo-hydroxide (FeOOH), and desorbed arsenic from the sediment particles, and the ion exchange of adsorbed arsenic with phosphate from fertilizers. The bacterial activity in sediment was considered a driving factor to create reducing the environment in anoxic groundwater through oxidation of dissolved organic matter to the above mechanisms (Wang & Mulligan 2006). Further, soil conditions,

pH, Eh, NO3,HCO3,SO4, and NH4 of sediment and groundwater are considered to be inﬂuencing factors along with the above concept. Acharyya et al. (1999, 2000); Anawar et al. (2003), and Brömssen et al. (2014) reported that agricultural fertilizers may encourage arsenic mobilization by ion-exchange with P and N bearing ions resulting from fertilizers. According to

the lab experiments of Uddin & Kurosawa (2010) and Mahin et al. (2008), the NO3 and PO4 concentrations in sediment and groundwater were high in an arsenic-affected area in Bangladesh, and the source of these ions would be inorganic fertilizers. The mode of incidence and mobility of arsenic in sedimentary aquifers may be controlled by a complex interaction of micro- bially facilitated reactions and hydro-geochemical processes sensitive to site-speciﬁc hydrology and sediment type, as well as anthropogenic activities, such as application of chemical manure. Several studies were conducted in the last few decades but failed to explore a clear concept on the mechanisms of arsenic mobilization in the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna (GBM) delta aquifers and the role of chemical fertilizer in mobilization are not yet clearly understood. Hence, critical review studies are imperative to explore the geochemical mechanism controlling arsenic mobilization in the Bengal delta area. The study aimed to investigate the impact of chemical fertilizer on arsenic mobilization in the sedimentary deposition of the GBM delta system.

Hypothesis The application of chemical fertilizer is the major anthropogenic cause of arsenic contamination in groundwater of the Bengal delta plain (BDP).

Research questions 1. What is the country and District wise pooled concentration of arsenic in groundwater and what Districts are highly affected or relatively less affected? 2. How is the correlation of arsenic concentration with pH, nitrate, ammonium, phosphate, sulfate, calcium, and potassium in groundwater and how is their presence in the aquifer system due to the use of chemical fertilizer? 3. What is the role of those parameters in the mechanism of arsenic mobilization at certain lithological conditions? 4. Whether the chemical fertilizer is the main anthropogenic cause of high arsenic concentration in groundwater?

METHODS OF INVESTIGATION AND DATA SOURCE The mechanisms and inﬂuencing factors of arsenic mobilization from sediment to groundwater have been investigated worldwide since the 1980s, but a signiﬁcant difference of those mechanisms between the papers before 2012 and after that time was

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 4

observed. Thus, reviewed papers were divided into two groups: before and after 2012. Initially, the study identiﬁed over 150 published papers on arsenic contamination in aquifers but ﬁnally included 60 articles, 42 are before 2012 and 18 are after 2012. Here, the study follows the PRISMA statement (Moher et al. 2009) for every event of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Bangladesh has 19 administrative Districts (old). The study pooled the district-wise value/concentration of pH, NO3,NH4,

PO4,SO4, Ca, and K of groundwater from secondary data and the pooled values of those parameters are included in Table 1. The study assumed that these ion concentrations were increased by inorganic fertilizer leaching and inﬂuenced the arsenic dissolution process in groundwater aquifers along with the geological processes. At the same time, the District-wise concentration of arsenic is shown in Table 1. It shows the build-up of correlation/association between those parameters with arsenic concentration. Also, the study selected the ten most arsenic-affected Districts out of a total of 64 (new), and their soil physiography with other necessary data is shown later. Subsequently, Table 1 acts as referral material to ﬁnd out the actual mechanism of arsenic mobilization in sediment and/or water body of the BDP. As well, the two least affected Divisions, Raj- shahi and Rangpur of Bangladesh are considered in the research hypothesis. For any statistical measurement in this study, XLSTAT and SPSS software was applied.

Study area: geomorphology, hydrology, and water type Tropical monsoon is a vital climatic feature of the BDP and has humic meteorological conditions. Average yearly rainfall is lowest in the north-west (1,430 mm) and increases both to the south-east (2,745 mm) and the north-east (4,178 mm). Despite the heavy rainfall, about 90% of river ﬂows in Bangladesh originate in India, Nepal, and China, and those create a widespread ﬂoodplain. The Bengal delta, situated in Bangladesh, is the largest alluvial sedimentary basement of the world. It is typically made up of tertiary and quaternary deposits (Goodbred & Kuehl 2000). Sediment deposited on the Ganges–Brahmaputra river has created one of the largest deltas in the world (Mukherjee et al. 2001). The minerals of these areas are dominated

by detritus quartz and feldspar; and the main mineralization processes are Fe(OH)3 reduction, silicate weathering, and mixing with salty water (Mukherjee et al. 2009). The country has promising hydrogeologic conditions and tropical monsoon weather indicates potential storage of groundwater in aquifers. The unconsolidated near-surface Pleistocene to recent estuarine and fluvial sediments underlying most of the country usually form productive aquifers and deep semi-contracted to the uncontracted fluvial-deltaic deposit of Miocene age to the recent forms of many aquifers. The floodplains of the active/inactive delta plain and the major rivers of the GBM delta complex occupy 82% of the country (Figure 1)(BGS-DPHE 2001). The existing sub-surface geological studies indicate that the bulk of the good aquifers occur between 25 and 130 m depth but the upper portion of this layer is at high risk for arsenic contamination. The Pleistocene aquifers are typically free of arsenic, but this is not true for the Holocene aquifers, which are rich in arsenic concentration. The highest arsenic was detected in those Holocene aquifers, which are roughly 3,000 years old (Dowling et al. 2002). The water of the upper Holocene aquifers is nearly 100 years old and holds less arsenic concentration. However, the Holocene deposits are not homogenous and steady and are characterized by gaps and holes allowing the vertical extension of arsenic contamination (BGS-DPHE 2001). This explains the marked depth-dependence of the arsenic concentration. The maximum concentrations are found at 20–55 m, which correspond to young and shallow aquifers and the depth of aquifers is not enough to measure for waters being free of arsenic. In general, deeper aquifers (.120 m) produce groundwater with arsenic levels below the WHO standard of 10 μg/L (Bhattacharya et al. 2000). Arsenic is transported to the BDP by the phases adsorbed on suspended particulates because of the oxidation of primary arsenic-sulfide minerals. It is typically adsorbed and co-precipitated with secondary Fe, Mn, and Al, solid phases in the form of arsenic (þ5) and finally deposited in the delta depending on the topography of the basin (Nickson et al. 1998, 2000). One of the problems met in Bangladesh is the extreme inconsistency in the groundwater arsenic content between boreholes only 100 m away from each other (van Geen et al. 2011).

FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN BANGLADESH Based on chemical fertilizer consumption in the agricultural sector, Bangladesh is placed 18th out of 86 of the most worldwide consumer countries and 7th out of 32 Asian consumer countries (Index-mundi 2020). Fertilizer consumption (% of fertilizer production) in Bangladesh was 392.38 from 2016 to 2002. Its highest value over the past 14 years was 476.95 in 2015, while its lowest value was 121.21 in 2002. On the other hand, 175 kg/hectare chemical fertilizer was used in 2002 and this amount increased by 300 kg/hectare in 2016, but worldwide fertilizer consumption decreased by 2% during this same period (Figure 2)(WB 2017). The description of the most used fertilizers in Bangladesh is presented in Table 2.

Pooled concentration/value in the shallow aquifer Sl. Name of a No. District As (μg/L) pH NO3 (mg/L) NH4 (mg/L) PO4 (mg/L) SO4 (mg/L) Ca (mg/L) K (mg/L) Source

1 Dhaka 35.72 7.2 1.95 0.12 1.56 6.33 72.60 2.95 Alam et al. (2019); Mazeda et al. (2018) 2 Faridpur 141.34 7.53 3.98 – 1.92 5.27 103.8 5.01 Bodrud-doza et al. (2016); Islam et al. (2017a) 3 Mymensingh 31.76 8.19 0.06 0.96 0.16 0.16 41.2 2.36 Shahidullah et al. (2000); Nizam et al. (2016) 4 Narayanganj 178.12 6.9 4.71 1.05 3.55 8.9 68.0 3.58 Sarker & Zaman (2003); UNICEF-BBS (2009) norce Proof Uncorrected 5 Tangail 57.88 7.29 5.34 – 1.90 5.94 31.04 1.49 Proshad et al. (2017); Ahmed et al. (2021) 6 Pabna 102.11 6.94 7.77 – 5.86 2.95 75.0 7.30 Sarkar & Hassan (2006); Hossain et al. (2010) 7 Bogra 19.30 7.3 1.12 – 0.22 1.50 48.0 3.04 Shamsad (2010); Islam et al. (2017b) 8 Rangpur 18.30 7.5 1.10 0.09 0.38 1.90 12.6 2.10 Saha et al. (2019); UNICEF-BBS (2009) AQUA 9 Rajshahi 55.62 6.91 2.80 0.33 1.83 1.17 78.54 2.22 Mostafa et al. (2017); Rahman et al. (2017) –

10 Dinujpur 12.43 7.4 0.92 0.35 1.55 24.22 1.11 Islam et al. (2016); Bhuiyan et al. (2015) —

11 Chittagong 12.30 7.51 0.39 – 4.34 5.56 72.33 2.89 Mojumder & Islam (1995); Ahmed et al. 5 0, No 00 Vol Society and Ecosystems Infrastructure, Water (2010) 12 Comilla 359.76 7.1 4.50 9.29 8.14 5.34 111.6 9.52 Prodip et al. (2016); Brömssen et al. (2014) 13 Noakhali 362.38 7.2 3.91 2.80 3.50 5.39 72.00 10.90 Bhuiyan et al. (2010); Ahmed et al. (2010) 14 Sylhet 38.49 7.1 3.10 – 0.30 2.90 7.10 2.30 Islam et al. (2017c); UNICEF-BBS (2009) 15 Jessor 73.21 7.4 1.80 4.25 0.60 2.80 93.0 3.00 Uddin & Kurosawa (2010); Shaibur et al. (2012) 16 Khulna 156.40 7.5 6.20 – 4.98 10.25 101.0 17.0 Islam et al. (2017d) 17 Kushtia 83.55 7.5 3.10 5.71 5.05 3.19 88.50 5.50 Hossain et al. (2013); Islam & Mostafa (2021a, 2021b) 18 Barishal 333.10 7.58 4.23 – 5.3 46.86 44 9.46 Sukhen et al. (2017); UNICEF-BBS (2009) 19 Patuakhali 13.54 7.42 4.12 – 0.9 1.20 14.0 3.01 Islam et al. (2017e); UNICEF-BBS (2009)

aRef. DPHE/BGS/DFID (2000); Chakrabarti et al. (2010); CSISA-MI (2015); MICS-B (2018); and World Bank Group (2019).

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 6

Figure 1 | Map of the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna (GBM) plain.

Some raw materials of fertilizer production contain arsenic minerals, and those types of fertilizer contribute to the arsenic in the soil, which then leaches to groundwater. For example, phosphate fertilizers are possible sources of arsenic. The concentration of arsenic in the fertilizer will vary with the source rock for phosphate to produce the fertilizer. The arsenic content of phosphate fertilizer, widely used by farmers in Bangladesh, ranges from 2.42 to 6.79 mg/kg (Mahin et al. 2008; Uddin & Kurosawa 2010). Campos (2002) reported that NPK fertilizer carries 6.12 + 0.04 mg/kg arsenic. Thus, chemical methods contribute to arsenic in the soil system as well as in the groundwater body. Chemical fertilizers that contain toxic pollutants or species leach through the soils and enter into groundwater and can increase the arsenic mobilization in aquifers (Table 2).

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 7

Figure 2 | Rate of the world and nationwide chemical fertilizer consumption.

Table 2 | Descriptions of mostly used chemical fertilizer in Bangladesh (Gowariker et al. 2009; Jones 2012; Rajani 2019)

Fertilizer class Type Example Chemical formula Probably released ions

þ Single nutrient Nitrogenous Urea NH2CONH2 H ,NH4, NO3

Ammonium nitrate NH4NO3 NH4,NO3

Calcium nitrate Ca(NO3)2 Ca, NO3 þ Phosphorus Single super phosphate, SSP Ca(H2PO4)2;14–18% P2O5 Ca, PO4,H

Gypsum CaSO4.2H2O Ca, SO4 þ Triple superphosphate Ca(H2PO4)2.H2O; 43–48% P2O5 Ca, PO4,H Potassium Muriate of potash (MoP) 95–99% KCl K, Cl Lime Lime, milk of magnesia, soda lime Cao, Ca(OH)2, soda Ca, Na, OH þ Multi-nutrient NP Mono-ammonium phosphate, MAP NH4H2PO4 NH4,PO4,H þ Di-ammonium phosphate, DAP (NH4)2HPO4 NH4,PO4,H þ NPK Ratio: 10-10-10 or 16-4-8 N þ K2O þ P2O5 NO3,NO2,K ,PO4,NH4

DISTRIBUTION OF ARSENIC IN BANGLADESH’S GROUNDWATER Arsenic, a category-1 carcinogenic element (Driscoll et al. 2000), occurs naturally in groundwater supplies through all parts of south-east Asia. About 25% of water wells of shallow aquifers in the Ganges basin of Bangladesh and West Bengal of India are severely contaminated by naturally occurring arsenic (Ravenscroft 2007a, 2007b). It was ﬁrst recognized as a thought-provoking problem in Bangladesh in the 1990s. The arsenic concentration in most of the areas exceeded the maximum level of 10 μg/L suggested by the WHO. Over 75 million people, from 59 out of 64 Districts, were thought to be at risk of drinking water contaminated by arsenic in Bangladesh (Saﬁuddin 2011). Every year, an assessed 43,000 people are affected by arsenic poisoning in the country (Jahan 2016). The authority has taken several steps and made strategies to try to address the calamity. Nevertheless, a countrywide movement and social mobilization activities by the government and NGOs to raise consciousness and knowledge levels among the public remain far below expectations. Several studies have been conducted in Southeast Asia and other countries of the world, including Bangladesh, but arsenic mobilization towards groundwater aquifers is not well understood. The complete scenario of the countrywide arsenic level of groundwater is summarized in Table 3.

MOBILITY OF ARSENIC IN BENGAL BASIN AQUIFER The mobility of arsenic in soils to groundwater depends on several factors including soil mineralogy, redox potential, pH, Eh, and the presence of other components that compete with arsenic for soil retention sites. Arsenic contamination in aquifers

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 8

Table 3 | Statistics of the arsenic calamity in Bangladesh (Ref: Aggarwal et al. 2000; Fazal et al. 2001; Faruque 2006; MICS-B/BBS/UNICEF 2009; Chakraborti et al. 2010)

Basic data Value Percentage (%)

Area of Bangladesh 147,570 km2 – The population of Bangladesh (June 2019) 165.6 million – Number of Districts in Bangladesh (new) 64 – WHO arsenic potable water standard 10 μg/L – Bangladesh arsenic potable water standard 50 μg/L – Number of Districts surveyed 64 100 Number of Districts having arsenic above 50 μg/L in groundwater 59 92.2 Total area of affected 59 Districts 126,134 km2 85.5 Total population at risk .80 million .48 Potentially exposed population .35 million .21 Total number of patients suffering from arsenicosis .38,000 – The total number of patients who died 10 – Heavy contaminated districts: Chandpur (90%), Monshiganj (83%), Gopalganj (79%), Madaripur (69%), Noakhali (69%), Satkhira (67%), Comilla (65%), Faridpur (65%), Shariatpur (65%), Bagerhat (60%), and Meherpur (60%) Least affected districts: Thakurgaon, Dinajpur, Panchagarh, Nilphamari, Natore, Lalmonirhat, Patuakhali, and Barguna

can arise both naturally and anthropogenically and the method of the mechanism of arsenic mobilization be completely regional. This contamination in Bangladesh arises because of an unfortunate combination of four natural aspects: a source of arsenic (arsenic present in the aquifer sediment), adsorption of arsenic (adsorbed with metal in sediment), mobilization (arsenic release from the sediment to neighboring water), and transport (arsenic circulating in the groundwater) (Ravenscroft et al. 2005; Mostafa et al. 2010). In Bangladesh, two prevailing hypotheses expressing the mobilization of arsenic into groundwater are the oxidation of pyrite and the reduction of metal oxy-hydroxide (Mostafa et al. 2011). A study performed in Bangladesh showed a decline in groundwater level at 0.1–0.5 m year 1, indicating a reduction of the storage in aquifer resulting from the unsustainable withdrawal of groundwater for both irrigation and domestic use (Zahid 2015). The over-extraction of groundwater and extensive application of inorganic fertilizer and arsenic-rich pesticides were the main suspects for the anthropogenic cause of arsenic contamination in Bangladesh, but recent investigations strongly oppose this thought by respecting the facts that are discussed below. 1. Oxidation of pyrite: Several studies conducted in the last two decades illustrated that iron-pyrite and arsenopyrite in the þ þ aquifer sediments oxidized to As3 and As5 , and were released into the groundwater aquifer (Chowdhury et al. 1999; Mazumdar 2000; Nickson et al. 2000; Mukherjee & Bhattacharya 2001; Ravenscroft et al. 2001; Hasan et al. 2007; Das et al. 2015). Furthermore, the oxidation might have occurred due to the entry of atmospheric oxygen into the aquifers during groundwater extraction through deep and shallow tube-wells.

þ þ ! þ 2 þ þ FeS O2 H2O Fe(OH)3 SO4 H

þ 3þ þ ! 2þ þ 2 þ þ þ : FeAsS Fe H2O Fe SO4 H H3AsO4(aq )

The rationality of this hypothesis has been keenly criticized by researchers since the groundwater in this region is: (i) anoxic

type, with negligible dissolved oxygen, (ii) near-neutral pH or moderate alkaline, (iii) categorized by low SO4 concentrations

with no relationship to arsenic, and (iv) characterized by very low concentration of NO3 (Ravenscroft et al. 2001; Pal et al. 2009). This mechanism was postponed at that time, and the following processes demonstrated later. 2. FeOOH reduction: Bacterial metabolism of dissolved organic matter in the sub-surface leading to anoxic conditions, thus leading to reduction of lepidocrocite mineral, FeO(OH), and then resulting in the release of adsorbed arsenic into the groundwater (McArthur et al. 2004; Swartz et al. 2004; Harvey et al. 2005).

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 9

3. Redox process: Arsenic is released by the reductive dissolution of arsenic-rich FeO(OH), and this is a redox process that

occurs after microbial oxidation of organic matter has consumed DO, NO3, and NH4 (as the nutrient of microorganisms) (Zheng et al. 2004; Harvey et al. 2006; Mukherjee et al. 2006; Pal et al. 2009). 4. Ion exchange: Arsenate anion adsorbed to aquifer minerals is being displaced into the aqueous medium by a competitive exchange of phosphate anion resulting in arsenic contamination in groundwater (Mahin et al. 2008; Anawar et al. 2013; Shankar et al. 2014). The above mechanisms of 2, 3, and 4 were established after the 2000s. According to recently published papers, the availability of dissolved organic matter, sufﬁcient microbial community, an abundance of highly positive charge baring metal- minerals, high phosphate loads, and low Eh with moderately high pH in sediment or aquifer are the major criteria to boost arsenic concentration in a shallow groundwater system. Rather than anthropogenic causes, it is assumed that the geogenic condition is a major cause for arsenic mobilization in the study regions. Leached chemical species such as nitrate, phosphate, and ammonium, which originate from inorganic fertilizer, can affect the above mechanisms 2, 3, and 4. Also, due to the application of fertilizer, pH and Eh may change indirectly in sediment. How the arsenic adsorption-desorption mechanisms in the Bengal delta aquifer are affected by chemical fertilizers are critically discussed in the next sections.

DISCUSSION About 85% of irrigation and drinking water is being extracted from shallow aquifers in Bangladesh (DPHE 2017). These aquifers mainly consist of clayey, silt-clay, or sandy sediment. Several studies have conﬁrmed that aquifers enriched in Fe-, Mn-,

Al-oxides, PO4,NH4, and NO3 with organic matter and deposited in the middle part of shallow aquifers contain moderately high concentrations of arsenic, whereas the sediments of deep aquifers contain a low level of arsenic (Nath et al. 2008; Anawar et al. 2011; Uddin et al. 2011; Mohammadi et al. 2020). Among the total 64 administrative Districts (new) of Ban- gladesh, over 60% of groundwater samples of ten Districts exceed the national arsenic standard concentration of 50 μg/L (Table 3), and those Districts are considered as reference sites of the present study. These study sites represent three of five major geological units of the GBM delta: young Holocene terrace, fluvial flood plain, and delta plain (BBS 2018). The soil physiography and land types of most of the vulnerable areas are of relatively young sediment formation (∼3,000 years old) and these follow the order clayey . silt-clay . silt-loam, and most of the areas are river basins with a low-lying area having clay-muddy land (Table 4). Thus, it can be seen that high arsenic levels in groundwater or sediment are often associated with geologically young sediments (Holocene aquifer) and flat low-lying zones where groundwater flow is slow. Such conditions favor the reductive dissolution of iron oxides and/or desorption of arsenic from metal oxides associated with sediments. Several components are leached into the soil through the decomposition of chemical fertilizers. For this reason, the

concentration of NO3,NH4,PO4,SO4, Ca, and K in shallow groundwater is found in elevated levels because of fertilizers used in agriculture to increase crop yields. In Bangladesh, silt-clay, clayey, peaty-clay, and peat sediments are mainly located within 10–15 m of the surface, followed by sandy sediment going deeper. This part of the soil layer is typically important to desorption of arsenic and around this layer the impacting factors are applying their actions (Uddin & Kurosawa 2010). Stollenwerk et al. (2007), Mahin et al. (2008), Uddin & Kurosawa (2010), and Anawar et al. (2011) have shown by their experiments conducted in a separate region of the country that the N and P containing ions generated from nitrogen and phosphate fertilizer accumulate mainly in peat or clayey zone of the soil. They also found the concentration of arsenic in this part of the soil proﬁle is signiﬁcantly higher, and the arsenic loads are strongly correlated with those ions. The present study and previous reports (e.g., Sutton et al. 2009) show that the groundwater in the upper aquifers of the

Holocene delta is characterized by high levels of As, Fe, PO4,NH4,NO3, K, total organic carbon with a high pH, EC, and low value of Eh, whereas the deeper aquifers in the Pleistocene terrace deposits are characterized by a low level of

arsenic, dissolved carbon, NH4, Fe, and PO4, along with a relatively low pH and EC. Like the present study, many prior investigations have noticed similar occurrences of high and low arsenic concentrations in groundwater depending on the depth of the aquifer and the redox conditions in the different areas of Bangladesh (Harvey et al. 2006; Van Geen et al. 2011). Arsenic was inversely correlated with Eh values in the upper aquifer, whereas no relationship was found in the deeper aquifer (Zheng et al. 2004; McArthur 2018). The results suggested that arsenic mobilization was linked to the improvement of reducing conditions.

Here, the study developed a linear correlation matrix of arsenic with such parameters as pH, NO3,NH4,PO4,SO4, Ca, and K in shallow aquifer water of Bangladesh, and this is shown in Table 5. The results indicated that the values of the correlation

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 10

Table 4 | Ten most arsenic-affected Districts (new) of Bangladesh with soil properties and other necessary data (Table constructed from the report of BBS 2018)

% Samples exceed Net Most vulnerable the national standard Sub-soil nature Cultivable irrigated Sl.No Districts of arsenica Physiographic unit Soil physiography/Land type (acidic/alkaline) land area (%) land (%)

1 Chandpur 90 Lower Meghna Clayey – 20%; Silt-loam – Neutral, pH up 61.95 61.30 river floodplain 73%; Other – 7% to 7.1 2 Monshiganj 83 Meghna estuarine Clayey – 21%; Silt-clay – Neutral, pH up 57.66 57.47 floodplain 33%; Silt-loam – 24%; to 7.2 Other – 22% 3 Gopalganj 79 Gopalganj- Clayey – 82%; Other – Alkaline, pH 57.58 64.46 Khulna Bill 18% up to 7.7 4 Madaripur 69 Meghna estuarine Clayey – 21%; Loamy – Alkaline, pH 61.15 45.42 floodplain 33%; Silt-loam – 24%; up to 7.7 Other – 22% 5 Noakhali 69 Meghna estuarine Silt-loam – 45%; Other – Alkaline, pH 37.10 32.84 floodplain 55% up to 7.6 6 Satkhira 67 Gangues tidal Clayey – 18%; Silt-loam – Alkaline, pH 41.68 61.78 floodplain 78%; Other – 4% up to 7.9 7 Comilla 65 Meghna estuarine Clayey – 21%; Loamy – Neutral, pH up 65.88 76.54 floodplain 33%; Silt-loam – 24%; to 7.2 Other – 22% 8 Faridpur 65 Low Gangues Clayey – 31%; Silt-clay – Alkaline, pH 65.68 53.29 River 29%; Silt-loam – 13%; up to 7.7 floodplain Other – 27% 9 Shariatpur 65 Low Gangues Clayey – 31%; Silt-clay – Alkaline, pH 51.38 32.34 River 29%; Silt-loam – 13%; up to 7.7 floodplain Other – 27% 10 Bagerhat 60 Gangues tidal Clayey – 18%; Silt-loam – Neutral/ 29.35 21.99 floodplain 78%; Other – 4% alkaline, pH up to 7.5

aRef. DPHE/BGS/DFID (2000); Chakrabarti et al. (2010); CSISA-MI (2015); MICS-B (2018); and World Bank Group (2019).

Table 5 | Correlation matrix of variables with countrywide arsenic concentration

Parameters As pH NO3 PO4 SO4 Ca K

As 1 pH 0.1801 1

NO3 0.4798 0.4756 1

PO4 0.6899 0.2528 0.5937 1

SO4 0.5528 0.1177 0.2455 0.3921 1 Ca 0.4448 0.1603 0.2925 0.6117 0.0078 1 K 0.7089 0.0147 0.5859 0.6904 0.4051 0.528 1

Bold numbers indicate a strong correlation with each other.

coefficient (r) are about 0.5 or higher, and the concentration of these ions is strongly correlated with arsenic at p ¼ ,0.05, except for the pH. As well, an inter-component correlation was measured among the eight different variables through the principal component analysis (PCA) method (Table 6). The result showed a total variance of 65.35% and 17.159% for PC1 and PC2, respectively, with an Eigenvalue .1, as determined by two PCs of R-mode. The positive and negative values in PCA clarified that the water samples were affected or unaffected by the presence of extracted loads on a specific

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 11

Table 6 | Principal component (two components extracted) loadings of the variables (sorted by size)

Variables PCA1 PCA2

PO4 0.934 0.132

NO3 0.919 0.338 As 0.913 0.234 K 0.827 0.350 Ca 0.759 0.088

NH4 0.743 0.559

SO4 0.666 0.559 pH 0.649 0.656 %Variance 65.350 17.159 %Cumulative 65.350 82.509 Eigenvalue 5.228 1.373

Bold numbers indicate strong loading.

constituent. Except for the pH, PO4,NO3, As, K, Ca, and NH4 showed a strong association (bold font) with PC1. However,

only NH4 and pH are strongly loaded for PC2. Again, this result conﬁrmed the strong association among these parameters that revealed the inter-dependency with each other. Hence, the study assumed that the above-mentioned ions were respon- sible for the desorption of excess arsenic from its minerals into groundwater. However, various factors such as Fe, Al, and Mn load along with Eh, organic carbon, and microbial activities in the sediment can affect this process and are discussed earlier. The mechanism of inﬂuencing the above parameters (generated through fertilizer leaching) on arsenic dissolution is discussed below.

Arsenic vs phosphorus

Arsenic mobility in groundwater is a function of P concentration. The pooled concentration of PO4 in a countrywide shallow

aquifer is shown in Table 1. A strong positive correlation (r ¼ 0.69; p ¼ ,0.05 at 95% CI) between arsenic and PO4 was observed according to Figure 3. Nonetheless, the actual r value is greater than this observed value because some portion

of free PO4 in groundwater can be settled out by metal-PO4 precipitation, but did not occur for arsenic. Campos (2002) and Anawar et al. (2011) conducted studies in a region of Brazil and Bangladesh, respectively, and they also found the

same correlation between arsenic and PO4 in the groundwater. Under certain conditions (high pH and/or low iron and

Eh), it may increase arsenic solubility in soils contaminated with P-containing fertilizers because of competitive PO4-AsO4

exchange (Roberts et al. 2004; Tyrovola et al. 2006). An experimental study has shown that a 0.1M KH2PO4 solution can leach as much as 150 mg/kg of arsenic from Fe-coated sediments (Loeppert et al. 2002). Most likely, arsenic (þ5) was des- 2 orbed from the surfaces of the Fe coatings and replaced by the sorption of HPO4 or H2PO4 . The elemental P and As are placed in the same group of the periodic table, and these have similar electronic conﬁguration and properties. Besides, phosphates and arsenates showed almost a similar physicochemical behavior in soils. These two ions compete for sorption sites on the sediment or soil granules. Phosphate may signiﬁcantly reduce the adsorption of arsenic because it typically presents

greater concentrations than arsenates. Also, the charge density of PO4 is higher than arsenate and for this reason, PO4 has a greater attraction to highly positive Fe, Al, and/or Mn ions. Thus, it can easily replace the adsorbed arsenate from these metal mineral/ore surfaces. Manning & Goldberg (1997) stated that phosphorus and arsenic adsorption envelopes

exhibited a similar adsorption at pH 5.0 on kaolinite minerals and failed suddenly at pH . 6.5. The transport of PO4 in the sub-surface probably depends on the physical and chemical conditions and depth of the aquifer (Stollenwerk et al.

2007). For instance, higher pH in groundwater causes decreased sorption of PO4 on aquifer sediments. Reza et al. (2010)

and Uddin & Kurosawa (2010) conﬁrmed that if PO4 was coming from fertilizers, its concentration decreased as the soil

depth increased. The capacity of the sub-surface soils to adsorb PO4 applied as fertilizers depends, in part, on the PO4 load applied (Uddin & Kurosawa 2010). From the above discussion, it may be concluded that in the ten most arsenic-affected Districts of Bangladesh, phosphates fertilizer may be one of the major causes of heavy arsenic loads in groundwater. It is not the only cause but also depends on

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 12

Figure 3 | Scattered plot of pH, NO3,NH4,PO4,SO4, and K with arsenic concentration.

local soil characteristics. If the soil is peaty, muddy, or clayey, then it can retain the phosphates, otherwise not. Sandy soil cannot adsorb this ion. This argument was supported by several reports (Reza et al. 2010; Uddin & Kurosawa 2010). The soils of the other two Divisions, Rajshahi and Rangpur of Bangladesh, are sandy/sandy-loam (Table 7). Despite relatively more application of chemical fertilizer in both these divisions, they are much less affected by arsenic. In these areas, phosphate-fertilizer did not accumulate to the upper layer of the soil and cannot participate in the process of arsenic mobilization. Reza et al. (2010) also created a plot with r ¼ 0.7, p , 0.05 for the same GBM ﬂoodplain areas, which means high arsenic concentrations are associated with the higher range of phosphate concentration. Phosphorus is able to replace arsenic in soils and sediments, and thus the groundwater of the areas can have a higher possibility of contamination with arsenic. Another report showed that phosphate-fertilizer uses lower amounts in the ten highly arsenic-affected Districts of Bangladesh (BBS 2018). Therefore, it can be said that the geogenic conditions are the primary and vital cause of arsenic contamination in the groundwater of the Bengal delta plain rather than phosphate concentration.

Arsenic vs nitrogen It is well known that nitrate may be engaged in numerous microbe-mediated anoxic redox reactions in arsenic-rich soils and aquifers. Nitrate can reduce into nitrite and then ammonium, which coupled with the oxidations of several electron donors such as Fe(þ2), As(þ3), sulﬁde, lactate, pyruvate, acetate, and other organic/inorganic materials (Jiang et al. 2013; Zhang

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 13

Table 7 | Comparable dataset of the ten most prevalent Districts and Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions

Pooled value

Samples exceed the Rate of % Area of Soil national Cultivable Net inorganic Mean Mean the physiography/ standard of Sub-soil land area irrigated fertilizer uses soil DOC soil Eh Location country Land type arsenic nature (%) land (%) (%) (mg/L) (V)

Ten most prevalent 16.62 Clayey/silt- Over 70% Neutral- 53.46 52.33 87 4.63 þ0.16 Districts (see clay/silt- alkaline, Table 5) loam pH: 7.1– 7.9 Rajshahi and 23.14 Loamy/sandy- Below 10% Acidic- 72.12 58.21 113 2.19 þ0.34 Rangpur loam/silt- neutral, Divisions loam pH: 4.5– (consisting of 16 7.2 Districts)

et al. 2017). The desorption of arsenic from FeO(OH) mineral in soil or sediment, nitrate, nitrite, and ammonium has a complex, complicated, and debatable functioning capacity. Some influencing factors such as organic matter, microbial community, soil profile, pH, and Eh also affect the efficiency of the functioning capacity of these ions. Nitrate and ammonium may accumulate in subsoil by the leaching of nitrogen-rich fertilizer through various chemical decomposition. Like phos-

phate, the pooled concentration of both these ions is signiﬁcantly correlated (NO3: r ¼ 0.48, and NH4: r ¼ 0.71 at p , 0.05; 95% CI) with arsenic in groundwater of the Bengal delta plain (Figure 3). Nickson et al. (2000), Kiyoshi et al. (2008), Kurosawa et al. (2008, 2013), and Uddin & Kurosawa (2010) carried out their investigations in separate regions of Bangla-

desh and found a positive correlation of NO3,NH4, and pH with arsenic in groundwater, but the relationships among them

were not easy to understand. They assumed that a rise in the NO3 and NH4 concentration enhances microbial activity through the consumption of dissolved oxygen and then arsenic was released from FeO(OH)-rich sediments to the surround-

ing water body in a reducing condition. In this procedure, the NO3 and NH4 acted as a nutrient for microbes and the þ þ groundwater became a reducing environment. This reducing condition of the Fe (Fe3 to Fe2 ) was boosted by microbial metabolism of sedimentary organic matter and makes arsenic mobilization easier. This assumption may support the ﬁndings

of the present study that found the signiﬁcantly positive correlation of both NO3 and NH4 with arsenic in the countrywide groundwater samples. They have also identiﬁed the source of these ions in groundwater mainly as N-fertilizer, based on the δ15N analysis. Therefore, the application of N-fertilizer appears to have a positive effect on the arsenic concentration in

groundwater. Uddin & Kurosawa (2010) stated that the deposition of NH4 in peat/peat-clay sediment of shallow aquifer

(10–15 m) was higher than deep aquifer like PO4. They measured up to 60% organic matter in the shallow layer and assumed that this large amount of organic carbon may be able to raise the total nitrogen. Also, in the peaty-clay layer, organic matter can oxidize in the presence of micro-organisms and serve electrons which are received by nitrate to produce nitrite ion and

then NH4 with N2 by the complete redox process. This combined amount of NH4 may enhance the arsenic release in sediment.

In the recent past, several studies established the different rules of NO3 and NH4 to the mobilization of arsenic in soil or water bodies by their experiments (Smith et al. 2017; Park et al. 2018; Shakya & Ghosh 2019; Yao et al. 2019; Zhu et al. 2020). The result of these investigations differs from the above mechanism. Mayorga et al. (2013) stated that the arsenic in water samples of Spain decreased along with the increase in nitrate concentrations and assumed that the increased use of nitrogenous fertilizer and pig manure in agricultural activities increased the nitrate content in groundwater, which would favor the precipitation of FeO(OH) and arsenic adsorption. As well, Smith et al. (2017) reported that the accumulation of nitrate in anoxic groundwater improved bacterial mediated processes in the aquifer that ultimately result in arsenic immobil-

ization. Another study illustrated that the NO3 concentration increase in groundwater results in a decrease in the total arsenic concentration through adsorption of arsenic and iron sulﬁde precipitation (Shakya & Ghosh 2019), although, there was a ﬁxed amount of metal-oxyhydroxides (MOOH) yielded following the nitrate additions, which resulted in an increased arsenic level like those measured in the groundwater before nitrate addition. The nitrate itself was removed in the process, being

reduced ﬁrst to N2O gas and then to N2 gas.

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 14

Figure 4 | Adsorption of arsenic through the redox reaction between Fe(þ2) and NO3 .

Kurosawa et al. (2013) and Smith et al. (2017) stated that NO3 became a progressively abundant potential electron acceptor for the oxidation of Fe(þ2) in an aquifer, but this redox pair has not been well characterized inside subsoil settings. To explore this reaction and its implications for redox-sensitive aquifer contamination, Smith et al. (2017) led an in-situ ﬁeld study in contaminated groundwater on Cape Cod Bay (USA) with variables Fe(þ2), phosphate, nitrate, arsenic(þ3), and arsenic(þ5) containing groundwater. The experimental results showed that Fe(þ2) oxidized to Fe(þ3) and released an electron that was

accepted by NO3 and reduced to N2O followed by N2. Both Fe(þ2) and NO3 steadily decreased in the aquifer and, finally, Fe(þ3) would be precipitated as FeO(OH) in sediment (Figure 4). Arsenic (þ3 and þ5) could be adsorbed on the surface of FeO(OH). The study revealed that nitrate-dependent Fe(þ2) oxidation at anoxic conditions can occur in groundwater, and this process can affect the mobility of other species, e.g., arsenic and phosphate not directly involved in the redox reaction. This mechanism indicates that nitrate can reduce the arsenic in the groundwater system, i.e., it is inversely correlated to arsenic in the groundwater system, but in this process, bacterial activity plays a vital role in the reductive environment that does not consider the above process. Recently, the impacts of nitrate on the bacterial catalyzed reductive dissolution of arsenic in contaminated aquifer soils have been investigated by many researchers (Chen et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2017; Shakya et al. 2018; Li et al. 2019; Shakya & Ghosh 2019; Vishvas et al. 2020). The common findings from those studies indicated that due to inhibition of the bacterial arsenate respiring activity, nitrate/nitrite dramatically inhibits the microbe-catalyzed reductive dissolution of arsenic and iron in the arsenic-contaminated soils. The above investigators found that nitrate could significantly resist the genetic factor of the reductase protein in respiring bacterium cells of microbial. Throughout the microbial reactions,

Fe(þ3)/nitrate/arsenic(þ5) reduced to Fe(þ2)/nitrogen/arsenic(þ3), and ﬁnally, organic matter oxidized to CO2 or bicarbon- o 3 ate (Figure 5) with favorable ΔG values. These studies showed that the arsenic adsorbed either as arsenite (AsO4 )or 3 arsenate (AsO3 ) in the surface of FeO(OH). It formed through nitrite-driven Fe(þ2) oxidation by microorganisms under nitrate-reducing conditions and, ﬁnally, these ions precipitated in sediment. In this connection, Zhu et al. (2020) showed that denitrifying bacteria could facilitate the reduction of aqueous arsenic (þ3) and/or As(þ5) through indirect Fe(þ2) oxidation in the solid-phase surface of FeOOH-mineral under certain lithological conditions. The denitrifying bacteria could be found in peaty and clayey/muddy soil. Figure 4 represents the above mechanism of arsenic dissolution through microbial

activity under the NO3 , Fe(þ2) redox environment.

Thus, NO3 and NH4 would act as a nutrient to microbes that enhanced the potentiality of microbes to participate in the above redox reactions as catalysts. Again, it also summarized that nitrate is involved in multi-dependent microbial mediated anoxic redox reactions in the arsenic-laden soil/sediments and aquifers in which the arsenic dissolution process was inhibited signiﬁcantly. The effects of these reactions on the arsenic mobilization from the mineral phase are complicated and poorly understood so far. Therefore, the function of nitrogen-fertilizers to arsenic contamination in aquifers of BDB is not acknowl- edged, and a further thorough study would be needed.

Arsenic vs sulfate

As with other inﬂuencing factors, SO4 signiﬁcantly correlated with countrywide arsenic concentration (r ¼ 0.55 at p , 0.05; 95% CI). It acts as a weak electron acceptor (DGo ¼47.6 kJ/mole acetate), which accepts an electron from organic materials

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 15

Figure 5 | Fate and occurrence of arsenic in the aquifer through microbial activities and overall bio-reaction of iron, nitrate, arsenate, and sulfate reducers.

and forms sulfide then it adds to Fe(þ2) and As(þ3) (Figure 5). Finally, the sulfate is removed by co-precipitation of sulfide of þ arsenic with sulfide of iron (Altun et al. 2014; Shakya & Ghosh 2019). Like NO3,SO4 reduction generates H and high

acidity retards the formation of arseno-sulﬁde precipitation (Henke 2009). But then, SO4 has an insigniﬁcant contribution to the countrywide arsenic dissolution process in groundwater.

Arsenic vs pH

Urea (NH2CONH2) fertilizer is the major source of nitrogen of all types of agricultural activities, and it may increase the acidity (lower pH) in soil. Like other results of various studies, Figure 3 show the slightly negative correlation between arsenic and pH. However, experiments indicated that high pH values of the groundwater might also favor the arsenic desorption processes. The sorption of arsenic to metal was usually pH-dependent (Mostafa & Hoinkis 2012; McArthur 2018), and As(þ5) tends to be strongly sorbent with metal oxo-hydroxide minerals at near-neutral to acidic pH situations. At alkaline pH, mineral surfaces become negatively charged, hence promoting arsenic desorption (O’Shea et al. 2007). The experiment

of Smedley & Kinniburgh (2002) and Romero et al. (2004) showed that the existence of PO4 and HCO3 in a solution with increasing pH could change the nonlinear adsorption isotherm of arsenic, and thus affect its mobilization in groundwater. þ The processes that may result from varying pH are H uptake by mineral or rock dissolution and ion-exchange reactions. As well, the weathering of carbonate minerals may occur by reducing pH, which may, in turn, mobilize arsenic that had arrived at the carbonate lattices at higher pH (Romero et al. 2004). Most studies showed that in oxidizing systems pH is posi- tively correlated with dissolved arsenic.

Arsenic vs K and Ca Some metals such as K and Ca were released and accumulate in sub-soil or groundwater from inorganic fertilizer. Potassium could release from MP fertilizer, which has been excessively used in Bangladesh. A strong positive correlation (Figure 3) was observed between arsenic and K in Bangladesh’s shallow groundwater. Thus, the study expected that K has no participation in the arsenic dissolution mechanism in the sediment or water phase. We cannot ﬁnd any literature about this matter and it demands future research.

The above discussion proves that the function of NO3,SO4, and NH4 in arsenic release to groundwater depends on several factors and conditions. Recent investigations have reported the negative impact of those ions on arsenic mobilization in sediment and/or aquifer water, but countrywide data on those components of groundwater have strongly positive relations with the arsenic concentrations. Some researchers also stated that the role of these ions fully depends on the local lithological

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 16

Table 8 | Role of mobilizing agents with arsenic in aquifers of the ten most affected Districts and the least affected Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions

Mobilizing agent Most affected ten Districts (see Table 5) Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions (least affected 16 Districts)

FeOOH Arsenic is desorbed due to the dissolution of Fe and Mn Arsenic is released from sediments due to direct hydroxide minerals in groundwater mediated by bacteria desorption of arsenic or precipitation of FeOOH under a reducing environment

Phosphate, Higher arsenic is associated with higher PO4 in groundwater Higher arsenic is associated with lower PO4 in PO4 groundwater, so PO4 may not play a role in arsenic release from sediments Organic Arsenic shows a positive and significant correlation with the Arsenic shows no correlation with the fluorescence materials fluorescence intensity of humic substances in groundwater intensity of humic substances in groundwater pH Arsenic shows no correlation with pH Arsenic shows a positive and significant correlation with pH

conditions. In the case of PO4, pH, Ca, and K show the expected correlation with the arsenic dissolution rate, but the causes of an excess concentration of arsenic in the most affected areas in which both the cultivable land and application of chemical fertilizers are relatively lower than the other less affected areas of Bangladesh are not clear (Table 7). Thus, it is assumed that chemical fertilizer leaching is not the major (or any) cause of groundwater arsenic contamination. Other drivers may be controlling the action of fertilizer-borne inﬂuencing factors. This phenomenon will be clear if the situation of the most arsenic- affected areas with the least affected areas of Bangladesh is compared.

Comparative studies between low- and high arsenic-affected areas in BDP Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions are in the northwest of the country and have very fertile cropland relative to other regions of Bangladesh. There is 72% of total land cultivable, of which, nearly about 30% is triple cropped area. Almost all cultivable lands are loamy, sandy, or sandy-loam whereas clayey or silt-clay formation is not found in either division (Reza et al. 2010). The sub-soil of these regions is neutral to extremely acidic with a pH of 7.2–4.5. The consumption of urea, phosphate, and potash fertilizers in both divisions are the highest in the country (MSUK 2010). The irrigable area of the Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions is 85% out of total cultivable land. These areas’ soils contain fewer organic matters, and Eh values of soil are relatively high. Both these areas are free from any arsenic contamination, although the chemical manure consumption rate is very high (Reza et al. 2010). In these areas, except for the heavy application of fertilizer, other factors such as soil pH, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and Eh, which are the main drivers of arsenic dissolution, favor less arsenic contamination. Comparative information between the ten highly arsenic prevalence Districts and relatively safer two Divisions of Bangladesh is listed in Table 7 (MSUK 2010; Reza et al. 2010; BBS 2019). Some investigators think that water levels are drawn down by heavy water mining allowing the atmospheric oxygen to enter the aquifer, which may accelerate the release of arsenic by oxic-oxidation of pyrites (Roychowdhury et al. 2008). How- ever, the credibility of this observation is not acceptable for the Rajshahi and Rangpur Divisions. The irrigation activities are very common in both areas in the dry period, with the groundwater level signiﬁcantly declined due to over-exploitation of water (Zahid 2015; Hasan et al. 2020). Nickson et al. (2000), Nath et al. (2008), and Reza et al. (2010) described the relative function of mobilizing agents in the most and least affected areas of Bangladesh which are included brieﬂyinTable 8. This

table shows that, in the least affected areas, the lower concentration of arsenic does not depend on PO4, dissolved organics, and alkalinity of soil and arsenic released from the soil with low concentration due to direct desorption of arsenic or precipitation of FeO(OH). In the case of the ten most affected Districts, the reversed result was observed. It seemed that the main cause of this reversed result is the variation of soil physiography, i.e., fully geogenic, not anthropogenic.

CONCLUSIONS The review identiﬁed two major anthropogenic causes of arsenic contamination in groundwater along with the geogenic cause. These are over-use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides; and over-exploitation of groundwater. The exact cause of arsenic dissolution in an aquifer is very complex and doubtful. The study explained the possible mechanisms and causes

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 17

of arsenic mobilization in groundwater. The analysis results showed that the ten most arsenic-affected Districts of Bangladesh have less agrarian and irrigable land and use relatively less quantity of chemical fertilizers. The land of these areas consisted of clayey, peaty, silt-clay types of soil. Conversely, the northern part of the country with a negligible arsenic concentration in groundwater has the opposite situation of the highly affected areas. The investigation indicated that the anthropogenic causes were not considered for arsenic contamination in the Bengal basin area, whereas soil/sediment physiography was the major cause of the contamination. Hence, the study summarized the ﬁndings as follows: 1. The countrywide pooled concentration of arsenic was 109.75 (52.59, 166.91) μg/L at 95% CI with a standard deviation of +118.56, which was greater than double the national standard (50 μg/L).

2. The concentrations of arsenic were signiﬁcantly correlated with NO3,NH4,PO4,SO4, Ca, and K in nationwide groundwater, and these components may be released from chemical fertilizer leaching.

3. The role of PO4 in arsenic mobilization was understandable but not in the case of NO3,SO4, and NH4 at certain lithological conditions. 4. The fertilizer leaching could affect the arsenic mobilization in groundwater if lithological conditions are clayey, peaty, silt- clay in nature, and have a rich microbial community with sufﬁciently organic carbon load. 5. The main anthropogenic cause of high arsenic concentration in groundwater of the BDP was not caused by using chemical fertilizers in this area, but it is geogenic. 6. The overall lithological conditions are the main reason for the high arsenic load in groundwater in the basin area, and the anthropogenic source is insigniﬁcant in the study areas.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

REFERENCES

Acharyya, S., Chakraborty, P., Lahiri, S., Raymahashay, B., Guha, S. & Bhowmik, A. 1999 Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges Delta. Nature 401, 545. doi:10.1038/44052. Acharyya, S. K., Lahiri, S., Raymahashay, B. C. & Bhowmik, A. 2000 Arsenic toxicity of groundwater in parts of the Bengal basin in India and Bangladesh: the role of quaternary stratigraphy and Holocene sea-level fluctuation. Environmental Geology 39 (10), 1127–1137. doi:10. 1007/s002540000107. Aggarwal, P. K., Basu, A. R., Poreda, R., Kulkarni, K. M., Froehlich, K., Tarafdar, S. A., Ali, M., Ahmed, N., Hussain, A., Rahman, M. & Ahmed, S. R. 2000 A report on isotope hydrology of groundwater in Bangladesh: implications for characterization and mitigation of arsenic in groundwater. In: Work Performed Within an IAEA-TC Project (No. BGD/8/016). IAEA, Vienna, Austria, p. 61. Ahmed, M., Haque, M., Ahsan, M., Siraj, S., Bhuiyan, H., Bhattacharjee, S. & Islam, S. 2010 Physicochemical assessment of surface and groundwater quality of the Greater Chittagong Region of Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Analytical and Environmental Chemistry 11 (2), 1–11. Ahmed, F. T., Khan, A. H. N., Khan, R., Saha, S. K., Alam, M. F., Dafader, N. C., Sultana, S., Elius, I. B. & Al Mamum, S. 2021 Characterization of arsenic contaminated groundwater from central Bangladesh: irrigation feasibility and preliminary health risks assessment. Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management 15, 100433. Alam, M. S., Han, B., Al-Mizan & Pichtel, J. 2019 Assessment of soil and groundwater contamination at a former Tannery district in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environmental Geochemical Health 42, 1905–1920. doi:10.1007/s10653-019-00457-6. Alsubih, M., El Morabet, R., Khan, R. A., Khan, N. A., Khan, M.-u., Ahmed, S., Qadir, A. & Changani, F. 2021 Occurrence and health risk assessment of arsenic and heavy metals in groundwater of three industrial areas in Delhi, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-15062-3. Altun, M., Sahinkaya, E., Durukan, I., Bektas, S. & Komnitsas, K. 2014 Arsenic removal in a sulfidogenic fixed-bed column bioreactor. Journal of Hazardous Materials 269,31–37. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.11.047. Anawar, H. M., Akai, J., Mihaljevič, M., Sikder, A. M., Ahmed, G., Tareq, S. M. & Rahman, M. M. 2011 Arsenic contamination in groundwater of Bangladesh: perspectives on geochemical, microbial and anthropogenic issues. Water 3 (4), 1050–1076. doi:10.3390/ w3041050. Anawar, H., Akai, J., Komaki, K., Terao, H., Yoshioka, T., Ishizuka, T., Safiullah, S. & Kato, K. 2003 Geochemical occurrence of arsenic in groundwater of Bangladesh: sources and mobilization processes. Journal of Geochemical Exploration 77 (2–3), 109–131. doi:10.1016/ S0375-6742(02)00273-X. Anawar, H. M., Tareq, S. M. & Ahmed, G. 2013 Is organic matter a source or redox driver or both for arsenic release in groundwater? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 58–60,49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2013.04.009.

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 18

BBS 2018 Annual Report. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, People’s Republic of Bangladesh. BBS 2019 Annual Report. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, People’s Republic of Bangladesh. BGS-DPHE 2001 Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Bangladesh. Technical Report, WC/00/19. British Geological Survey (BGS), Keyworth, UK. Bhattacharya, P., Jacks, G., Larsson, M., Leiss, A., Bhattacharyya, R., Chatterjee, D. & von Brcimssen, M. 2000 Suitability of low-cost remediation techniques for the amendment of high-arsenic groundwater in West Bengal and Bangladesh. In: Abstract, International Workshop on Control of Arsenic Concentration in Groundwater PHED, Calcutta, India. Bhuiyan, M. A. H., Bodrud-Doza, M., Islam, A. R. M. T., Rakib, M. A., Rahman, M. S. & Ramanathan, A. L. 2010 Assessment of groundwater quality of Lakshimpur district of Bangladesh using water quality indices, geostatistical methods, and multivariate analysis. Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (1020), 1–23. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5823-y. Bhuiyan, M. A. H., Ganyaglo, S. & Suzuki, S. 2015 Reconnaissance on the suitability of the available water resources for irrigation in Thakurgaon District of northwestern Bangladesh. Applied Water Science 5, 229–239. doi:10.1007/s13201-014-0184-8. Bodrud-Doza, M., Islam, A. R. M. T., Ahmed, F., Das, S., Saha, N. & Rahman, M. S. 2016 Characterization of groundwater quality using water evaluation indices, multivariate statistics and geostatistics in central Bangladesh. Water Science 30,19–40. doi:10.1016/j.wsj. 2016.05.001. Brömssen, M. V., Markussen, L., Bhattacharya, P., Ahmed, K. M., Hossain, M., Jacks, G., Sracek, O., Thunvik, R., Hasan, M. A., Islam, M. M. & Rahman, M. M. 2014 Hydrogeological investigation for assessment of the sustainability of low-arsenic aquifers as a safe drinking water source in regions with high-arsenic groundwater in Matlab, southeastern Bangladesh. Journal of Hydrology 518 (part C), 373–392. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.055. Campos, V. 2002 Arsenic in groundwater affected by phosphate fertilizers at Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environmental Geology 42,83–87. doi:10. 1007/s00254-002-0540-0. Chakraborti, D., Rahman, M. M., Das, B., Murrill, M., Dey, S. & Chandra, M. S. 2010 Status of groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh: a 14-year study report. Water Research 44 (19), 5789–5802. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.051. Chandrashekhar, A. K., Chandrasekharam, D. & Farooq, S. H. 2016 Contamination and mobilization of arsenic in the soil and groundwater and its influence on the irrigated crops, Manipur Valley, India. Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (142), 1–15. doi:10.1007/s12665-015- 5008-0. Chen, J., Yoshinaga, M., Garbinski, L. D. & Rosen, B. P. 2016 Synergistic interaction of glyceraldehydes-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and ArsJ, a novel organ arsenical efflux permease, confers arsenate resistance. Molecular Microbiology 100 (6), 945–953. doi:10.1111/mmi.13371. Chowdhury, T. R., Basu, G. K., Mandal, B. K., Samanta, G., Chowdhury, U. K., Chanda, C. R., Lodh, D., Lal Roy, S. L., Saha, K. C., Roy, S., Kabir, S., Quamruzzaman, Q. & Chakraborti, D. 1999 Arsenic poisoning in the Ganges delta. Nature 401, 545–546. doi:10.1038/44056. CSISA-MI 2015 Groundwater management in Bangladesh: An analysis of problems and opportunities. Central System Initiative for South Asia – Mechanization and Irrigation, USAID, Research Report No. 2. Dhaka. doi:10.13140/2.1.2381.9040 Das, K., Roy, D. & Mostafa, M. G. 2015 Sustainable management for arsenic (As) free safe drinking water in Bangladesh: a review. Journal of Petroleum and Environmental Biotechnology 6, 228. doi:10.4172/2157-7463.1000228. Dowling, C. B., Robert, J. P., Asish, R. B., Scott, L. P. & Pradeep, K. A. 2002 Geochemical study of arsenic release mechanisms in the Bengal Basin groundwater. Water Resources Research 38 (9), 1–18. doi:10.1029/2001WR000968. DPHE 2017 Department of Public Health Engineering. Government of Bangladesh. Driscoll, K. E., Costa, D. L., Hatch, G., Henderson, R., Oberdorster, G., Salem, H. & Schlesinger, R. B. 2000 Intratracheal instillation as an exposure technique for the evaluation of respiratory tract toxicity: uses and limitations. Toxicology Science 55 (1), 24–35. doi:10.1093/ toxsci/55.1.24. Faruq, A. N. 2018 Agriculture and pesticide consumption in Bangladesh (conference paper). In: Conference on Effluent Control and Waste Disposal in Pesticide Industry – with Especial Agenda on – Integrated Pest Management with Special Emphasis on Bio-Pesticide Component, Bogor, Indonesia. Faruque, H. M. 2006 Arsenic contamination in Bangladesh-an overview. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 113 (1–4), 1–16. doi:10. 1016/j.agee.2005.08.034. Fazal, M. A., Kawachi, T. & Ichion, E. 2001 Validity of the latest research findings on causes of groundwater Arseni contamination in Bangladesh. Water International 26 (2), 380–389. doi:10.1080/02508060108686930. Flanagan, S. V., Johnstan, R. B. & Zheng, Y. 2012 Arsenic in tube well water in Bangladesh: health and economic impacts and implementations for arsenic mitigation. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 90, 839–846. doi:10.2471/BLT.11.101253. Glodowska, M., Stopelli, E., Schneider, M., Rathi, B., Straub, D., Lightfoot, A., Kipfer, R., Berg, M., Jetten, M., Kleindienst, S. & Kappler, A. 2020 Arsenic mobilization by anaerobic iron-dependent methane oxidation. Communications Earth and Environment 1 (42), 1–7. doi:10.1038/s43247-020-00037-y. Goodbred, S. & Kuehl, S. 2000 The significance of large sediment supply, active tectonism, and eustasy on margin sequence development: Late Quaternary stratigraphy and evolution of the Ganges-Brahmaputra delta. Sedimentary Geology 133 (3–4), 227–248. doi:10.1016/ S0037-0738(00)00041-5. Gowariker, V., Krishnamurthy, V. N., Gowariker, S., Dhanorkar, M. & Paranjape, K. 2009 The Fertilizer Encyclopedia. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA. ISBN 978-0-470-41034-9. doi:10.1002/9780470431771.

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 19

Haque, A., Sumaiya, S. & Rahman, M. 2016 Flow distribution and sediment transport mechanism in the estuarine systems of Ganges- Brahmaputra-Meghna delta. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development 7 (1), 22–30. doi:10.7763/IJESD.2016. V7.735. Harvey, C. F., Ashfaque, K. N., Yu, W., Badruzzaman, A. B. M., Ali, M. A., Oates, P. M., Michael, H. A., Neumann, R. B., Beckie, R., Islam, S. & Ahmed, F. 2006 Groundwater dynamics and arsenic contamination in Bangladesh. Chemical Geology 228 (1), 112–136. doi:10.1016/ j.chemgeo.2005.11.025. Harvey, C. F., Swartz, C. H., Badruzzaman, A. B. M., Keon-Blute, N., Yu, W., Ali, M. A., Jay, J., Beckie, R., Niedan, V., Brabander, D., Oates, P. M., Ashfaque, K. N., Islam, S., Hemond, H. F. & Ahmed, M. F. 2005 Groundwater arsenic contamination on the Ganges delta: biogeochemistry, hydrology, human perturbations, and human suffering on a large scale. Comptes Rendus Geoscience 337 (1–2), 285–296. doi:10.1016/j.crte.2004.10.015. Hasan, M. A., Ahmed, K. M., Sracek, O., Bhattacharya, P., Bromssen, M. V. & Broms, S. 2007 Arsenic in shallow groundwater of Bangladesh: investigations from three different physiographic settings. Hydrogeology Journal 15, 1507–1522. doi:10.1007/s10040-007-0203-z. Hasan, M. R., Matin, I. & Mostafa, M. G. 2020 Assessment of specific yield and storage capacity of groundwater using borehole log. Journal of Environment and Earth Sciences 10 (8), 12–22. doi: 10.7176/JEES/10-8-02. Henke, K. R. 2009 Arsenic in natural environments. In: Arsenic: Environmental Chemistry, Health Threats and Waste Treatment (Henke, K., ed.). Wiley, Chichester, UK, pp. 69–235. doi:10.1002/9780470741122.ch3. Hossain, G., Howladar, M., Nessa, L., Ahmed, S. & Quamruzzaman, C. 2010 Hydrochemistry and classification of groundwater resources of Ishwardi Municipal Area, Pabna District, Bangladesh. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 28, 671–679. Doi:10.1007/s10706-010- 9326-4. Hossain, M. G., Selim, R. A. H. M., Lutfun-Nessa, M. & Ahmed, S. 2013 Factor and cluster analysis of water quality data of the groundwater wells of Kushtia, Bangladesh: implication for arsenic enrichment and mobilization. Journal of the Geological Society of India 81, 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0048-0. Hossain, S., Hosono, T., Ide, K., Matsunaga, M. & Shimada, J. 2016 Redox processes and occurrence of arsenic in a volcanic aquifer system of Kumamoto Area, Japan. Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (740), 1–19. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5557-x. Index-mundi 2020 Fertilizer Consumption (Kilograms per Hectare of Arable Land) - Country Ranking. Available from: https://www. indexmundi.com/ Islam, K., Rahman, M. S., Ali, M. H. & Hossain, A. F. M. A. 2016 Evolution of the aquifers system and groundwater quality of the north-west district of Bangladesh for development potential. BRAG University Journal XI (2), 85–100. Islam, T. A. R. M., Shen, S., Bodrud-Doza, M. & Rahman, M. S. 2017a Assessing irrigation water quality in Faridpur district of Bangladesh using several indices and statistical approaches. Arab Journal of Geoscience 10,1–25. doi:10.1007/s12517-017-3199-2. Islam, A. R. M., Shuanghe, S., Muhammed, H., Bodrud-Doza, M., Khin, M. & Habib, M. 2017b Assessing groundwater quality and its sustainability in Joypurhat district of Bangladesh using GIS and multivariate statistical approaches. Environment Development and Sustainability 19,1–25. doi:10.1007/s10668-017-9971-3. Islam, A. R. M., Nasir, A., Bodrud-Doza, M. & Ronghao, C. 2017c Characterizing groundwater quality ranks for drinking purposes in Sylhet district, Bangladesh, using entropy method, spatial autocorrelation index, and geostatistics. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24 (34), 26350–26374. http://doi:10.1007/s11356-017-0254-1. Islam, S. M. D. U., Bhuiyan, M. A. H., Rume, T. & Azam, G. 2017d Hydrogeochemical investigation of groundwater in shallow coastal aquifer of Khulna District, Bangladesh. Applied Water Science 7, 4219–4236. doi:10.1007/s13201-017-0533-5. Islam, S. M.-U., Majumder, R. K., Uddin, M. J., Khalil, M. I. & Alam, M. F. 2017e Hydrochemical characteristics and quality assessment of groundwater in Patuakhali district, southern coastal region of Bangladesh. Exposure and Health 9 (1), 43–60. Islam, M. S. & Mostafa, M. G. 2021a Hydro-geochemical evaluation of groundwater for irrigation within the Ganges River basin areas of Bangladesh. Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-161359/v1. Islam, M. S. & Mostafa, M. G. 2021b Groundwater suitability for irrigated agriculture in alluvial Bengal delta plain: a review. International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences 10 (2), 156–170. doi.10.11591/ijaas.v10.i2.pp156-170. Jahan, H. 2016 Arsenic in Bangladesh: How to Protect 20 Million from the World’s Largest Poisoning. The Guardian. Available from: https:// www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2016/oct/18/arsenic-contamination-poisoning-bangladesh-solutions Jiang, S., Lee, J.-H., Kim, D., Kanaly, R. A., Kim, M.-G. & Hur, H.-G. 2013 Differential arsenic mobilization from As-bearing ferrihydrite by iron-respiring Shewanella strains with different arsenic-reducing activities. Environmental Science & Technology 47 (15), 8616–8623. doi.10.1021/es400534z. Jiang, Z., Li, P., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Wei, D., Yuan, C. & Wang, H. 2019 Arsenic mobilization in a high arsenic groundwater revealed by metagenomic and Geochip analyses. Scientific Reports 9, 12972. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-49365-w. Johnston, R. B. & Motaleb, H. S. 2007 Arsenic mitigation in Bangladesh: national screening data and case studies in three upazilas. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A 42 (12), 1889–1896. doi:10.1080/10934520701567155. Jones Jr., J. B. 2012 Inorganic Chemical Fertilisers and Their Properties in Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility Manual, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. ISBN 978-1-4398-1609-7. Kiyoshi, E., Kazuhiko, T., Masakazu, J., Jahiruddin, M., Moslehuddin, A. Z. M. & Rahman, M. Z. 2008 Variation in arsenic concentration relative to ammonium nitrogen and oxidation reduction potential in surface and groundwater. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 39, 1467–1475. doi:10.1080/00103620802004318.

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 20

Kurosawa, K., Egashira, K., Tani, M., Jahiruddin, M., Moslehuddin, A. Z. & Rahman, Z. M. 2008 Groundwater-soil-crop relationship with respect to arsenic contamination in farming villages of Bangladesh–a preliminary study. Environmental Pollution 156 (2), 563–565. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.02.009. Kurosawa, K., Egashira, K. & Tani, M. 2013 Relationship of arsenic concentration with ammonium-nitrogen concentration, oxidation reduction potential and pH of groundwater in arsenic-contaminated areas in Asia. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 58– 60,85–88. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2013.04.016. Li, Y., Min, X., Ke, Y., Fei, J., Liu, D. & Tang, C. 2019 Immobilization potential and immobilization mechanism of arsenic in cemented paste backfill. Minerals Engineering 138, 101–107. doi.10.1016/J.MINENG.2019.04.041. Loeppert, R., Jain, A., El-Haleem, M. & Biswas, B. 2002 Quantity and speciation of arsenic in soils by chemical extraction. ACS Symposium Series 835,42–56. doi:10.1021/bk-2003-0835.ch004. Mahin, T., Ngai, T., Murcott, S. & Mondal, M. 2008 Importance of evaluating phosphate levels in tube-wells in high arsenic areas of Asia. In: 33rd WEDC International Conference, Accra, Ghana. Manning, B. & Goldberg, S. 1997 Modeling competitive adsorption of arsenate with phosphate and molybdate on oxide minerals. Soil Science Society of America Journal 31 (1), 121–131. doi:10.2136/sssaj1996.03615995006000010020x. Mayorga, P., Gardini, A., Anawar, H. & García-Sánchez, A. 2013 Temporal variation of arsenic and nitrate content in groundwater of the Duero River Basin (Spain). Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Parts A/B/C 58–60,22–27. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2013.04.001. Mazeda, I., Bashar, K., Ahmed, N. & Rasul, R. 2018 Hydrogeologic characteristics and groundwater potentiality of lower aquifer of Singair Upazila, Manikganj District, Bangladesh. Journal of Bangladesh Academy of Science 42 (1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v42i1. 37830. Mazumder, D. N., Haque, R., Ghosh, N., De, B. K., Santra, A., Chakraborti, D. & Smith, A. H. 2000 Arsenic in drinking water and the prevalence of respiratory effects in West Bengal, India. International Journal of Epidemiology 29 (6), 1047–1052. doi:10.1093/ije/29.6. 1047. McArthur, J. M. 2018 Arsenic in groundwater. In: Groundwater Development and Management: Issues and Challenges in South Asia (Sikdar, P. K., ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. and Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, pp. 297–308. McArthur, J. M., Banerjee, D. M., Hudson-Edwards, K. A., Mishra, R., Purohit, R., Ravenscroft, P., Cronin, A., Howarth, R. J., Chatterjee, A., Talukder, T., Lowry, D., Houghton, S. & Chadha, D. K. 2004 Natural organic matter in sedimentary basins and its relation to arsenic in anoxic groundwater: the example of West Bengal and its worldwide implications. Applied Geochemistry 19, 1255–1293. doi:10.1016/j. apgeochem.2004.02.001. MICS-B 2018 Water Quality Thematic Report: 2012–2013, Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey, UNICEF, and Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Bangladesh. MICS-B/BBS/UNICEF 2009 Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Bangladesh. Mohammadi, A. A., Zarei, A., Esmaeilzadeh, M., Taghavi, M., Yousefi, M., Yousefi, Z., Sedighi, F. & Javan, S. 2020 Assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risks assessment in soils around an industrial zone in Neyshabur, Iran. Biological Trace Element Research 195, 343–352. doi:10.1007/s12011-019-01816-1. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. & Altman, D. G. 2009 PRISMA group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6 (7), e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. Mojumder, S. M. M. H. & Islam, M. S. 1995 A study on water quality parameters of surface and groundwater of Chittagong and Cox’s Bazar town, Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of an International Workshop on Coastal Aquaculture and Environmental Management,Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Mostafa, M. G. & Hoinkis, J. 2012 Nanoparticles adsorbent for arsenic removal from drinking water: a review. International Journal of Environmental Science, Management and Engineering Research 1 (1), 20–31. Mostafa, M. G., Chen, Y.-H., Jean, J.-S., Liu, C.-C. & Teng, H. 2010 Adsorption and desorption properties of arsenate onto nano-sized iron oxide-coated quartz. Water Science and Technology 62 (2), 378–386. doi:10.2166/wst.2010.288. Mostafa, M. G., Chen, Y.-H., Jean, J.-S., Liu, C.-C. & Lee, Y.-C. 2011 Kinetics and mechanism of arsenate removal by nanosized iron oxide- coated perlite. Journal of Hazardous Materials 187 (1–3), 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.117. Mostafa, M. G., Uddin, S. M. H. & Haque, A. B. M. H. 2017 Assessment of hydro-geochemistry and groundwater quality of Rajshahi City in Bangladesh. Applied Water Sciences 7, 4663–4671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-017-0629y. MSUK 2010 Manab shakti unnayan (NGO), Annual report-2010, Bangladesh. Mukherjee, A. & Bhattacharya, P. 2001 Arsenic in groundwater in the Bengal Delta Plain: Slow poisoning in Bangladesh. Environmental Reviews 9 (3). doi:10.1139/er-9-3-189. Mukherjee, A., Sengupta, M., Hossain, M., Ahamed, S., Das, B., Nayak, B., Lodh, D., Rahman, M. M. & Chakraborti, D. 2006 Arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 24 (2), 142–163. Mukherjee, A., Bhattacharya, P., Shi, F., Fryar, A. E., Mukherjee, Xie, Z.-M., Jacks, A. B. G. & Bundschuh, J. 2009 Chemical evolution in the high arsenic groundwater of the Huhhot basin (Inner Mongolia, PR China) and its difference from the western Bengal basin (India). Applied Geochemistry 24 (10), 1835–1851. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.06.005.

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 21

Nath, B., Stüben, D. & Mallik, S. B. 2008 Mobility of arsenic in West Bengal aquifers conducting low and high groundwater arsenic. Part I: comparative hydrochemical and hydrogeological characteristics. Applied Geochemistry 23 (5), 977–995. doi.10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007. 11.016. Nickson, R. T., McArthur, J. M., Burgess, W. G., Ahrned, K. M., Ravenscroft, P. & Rahaman, M. 1998 Arsenic poisoning of Bangladesh groundwater. Nature 395, 338. doi:10.1038/26387. Nickson, R. T., McArthur, J. M., Ravcnscroft, P., Burgess, W. G. & Ahrrcd, K. M. 2000 Mechanism of arsenic release to groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal. Applied Geochemistry l5 (4), 403–413. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(99)00086-4. Nizam, M. U., Zaman, M. W., Rahman, M. M. & Islam, M. S. 2016 Quality status of groundwater in some selected villages of Bhaluka Upazila in Bangladesh for drinking, irrigation and livestock consumption. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University 12 (2), 313–319. doi:10. 3329/jbau.v12i2.28690. O’Shea, B., Jankowski, J. & Sammut, J. 2007 The source of naturally occurring arsenic in a coastal sand aquifer of eastern Australia. Science of the Total Environment 379 (2–3), 151–166. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.07.040. Pal, A., Chowdhury, U., Mondal, D., Das, B., Nayak, B., Ghosh, A., Maity, S. & Chakraborti, D. 2009 Arsenic burden from cooked rice in the populations of arsenic affected and nonaffected areas and Kolkata City in West-Bengal, India. Environmental Science and Technology 43, 3349–3355. doi:10.1021/es803414j. Park, S., Lee, J. H., Shin, T. J., Hur, H. G. & Kim, M. G. 2018 Adsorption and incorporation of arsenic to biogenic Lepidocrocite formed in the presence of ferrous iron during denitrification by Paracoccus denitrificans. Environmental Science and Technology 52 (17), 9983–9991. doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b02101. Paul, D., Kazy, S. K., Gupta, A. K., Pal, T. & Sar, P. 2015 Diversity, metabolic properties and arsenic mobilization potential of indigenous bacteria in arsenic contaminated groundwater of West Bengal, India. PLoS ONE 10 (3), e0118735. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118735. Prodip, K. R., Roy, B. & Roy, B. C. 2016 Assessment of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes in Comilla District of Bangladesh. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 6 (7), 52–59. Available from: https://ijsrp.org/ Proshad, R., Kormoker, T., Islam, M., Saha, B., Hossain, M. R., Prince, M. & Khan, M. 2017 An apportionment of arsenic and iron contamination of tube-well groundwater with possible health risk in Bangladesh. Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health 5, 117–123. doi:10.12691/jephh-5-3-7. Radfard, M., Yunesian, M., Nabizadeh, R., Biglari, H., Nazmara, S., Hadi, M., Yousefi, N., Yousefi, M., Abbasnia, A. & Mahvi, A. H. 2019 Drinking water quality and arsenic health risk assessment in Sistan and Baluchestan, Southeastern Province, Iran. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 25 (4), 949–965. doi.10.1080/10807039.2018.1458210. Rahman, M. A. T. M. T., Saadat, A. H. M., Islam, M. S., Al-Mansur, M. A. & Ahmed, S. 2017 Groundwater characterization and selection of suitable water type for irrigation in the western region of Bangladesh. Applied Water Science 7, 233–243. doi:10.1007/s13201-014- 0239-x. Rajani, A. V. 2019 Fertilizers composition and application. In: Conference: PG Seminar. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16323.55849. Ravenscroft, P. 2007a Predicting the global distribution of natural arsenic contamination of groundwater. In: Symposium on Arsenic: The Geography of A Global Problem. Royal Geographical Society, London, UK. Ravenscroft, P. 2007b Predicting the Global Extent of Arsenic Pollution of Groundwater and its Potential Impact on Human Health. Report for UNICEF, New York, USA. Ravenscroft, P., McArthur, J. M. & Hoque, B. A. 2001 Geochemical and palaeohydrological controls on pollution of groundwater by arsenic. In: Arsenic Exposure and Health Effects, IV (Chappell, W. R., Abernathy, C. O. & Calderon, R., eds). Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford, UK, pp. 53–77. Ravenscroft, P., Burgess, W. G., Ahmed, K. M., Burren, M. & Perrin, J. 2005 Arsenic in groundwater of the Bengal Basin, Bangladesh: distribution, field relations and hydrogeological setting. Hydrogeology Journal 13, 727–751. doi:10.1007/s10040-003-0314-0. Reza, A. H. M., Selim, J., Jiin-Shuh, Y., Huai-Jen, L., Ming-Kuo, W., Brian, L., Liu, C.-C., Lee, J.-F. & Luo, S. D. 2010 Occurrence of arsenic in core sediments and groundwater in the Chapai-Nawabganj District, northwestern Bangladesh. Water Research 44 (6), 2021–2037. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.12.006. Roberts, L., Hug, S., Ruettimann, T., Billah, M. M. K. & Rahman, M. 2004 Arsenic removal with iron(II) and iron(III) in waters with high silicate and phosphate concentrations. Environmental Science and Technology 38, 307–315. doi:10.1021/es0343205. Romero, F., Armienta, M. & Carrillo-Chávez, A. 2004 Arsenic sorption by carbonate-rich aquifer material, a control on arsenic mobility at Zimapen, Mexico. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 47 (1), 1–13. doi:10.1007/s00244-004-3009-1. Safiuddin, M. 2011 Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh: a review. International Journal of Physical Science 6 (30), 6791–6800. doi:10.5897/IJPS11.1300. Saha, S., Reza, A. H. M. S. & Roy, M. K. 2019 Hydrochemical evaluation of groundwater quality of the Tista floodplain, Rangpur, Bangladesh. Applied Water Science 9, 198. doi:10.1007/s13201-019-1085-7. Saleh, H. N., Panahande, M., Yousefi, M., Asghari, F. B., Conti, G. O., Talaee, E. & Mohammadi, A. A. 2019 Carcinogenic and non- carcinogenic risk assessment of heavy metals in groundwater wells in Neyshabur Plain, Iran. Biological Trace Element Research 190, 251–261. doi:10.1007/s12011-018-1516-6. Sanjrani, M. A., Zhou, B., Zhao, H., ain-Bhutto, S. U. & Muneer, A. S. 2019 Arsenic contaminated groundwater in China and its treatment options, a review. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 17 (2), 1655–1683. doi.10.15666/aeer/1702_16551683.

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 22

Sarkar, A. A. & Hassan, A. A. 2006 Water quality assessment of a groundwater basin in Bangladesh for irrigation use. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 9, 1677–1684. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2006.1677.1684. Sarker, B. & Zaman, M. W. 2003 Extent of pollution assessment in drinking water supplies of Narayanganj District in Bangladesh. Journal of Biological Sciences 3 (10), 854–863. http://doi:10.3923/jbs.2003.854.863. Shahidullah, S. M., Hakim, M. A., Alam, M. S. & Shamsuddoha, A. T. M. 2000 Assessment of groundwater quality in a selected area of Bangladesh. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 3 (2), 246–249. doi:10.3923/pjbs.2000.246.249. Shaibur, M., Anzum, H., Rana, M. & Khan, M. 2012 Assessment of supplied water quality at Jessore Municipality (Pourashava), Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Environmental Research 10,69–87. Shaji, E., Santosh, M., Sarath, K. V., Prakash, P., Deepchand, V. & Divya, B. V. 2020 Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a global synopsis with focus on the Indian Peninsula. Geoscience Frontiers 12 (3). doi.10.1016/j.gsf.2020.08.015. Shakya, A. K. & Ghosh, P. K. 2019 Simultaneous removal of arsenic, iron and nitrate in an attached growth bioreactor to meet drinking water standards: importance of sulphate and empty bed contact time. Journal of Cleaner Production 186, 1011–1020. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2018.03.139. Shakya, A. K., Rajput, P. & Ghosh, P. K. 2018 Investigation on stability and leaching characteristics of mixtures of biogenic arseno-sulphide and iron sulphide formed under reduced conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 353, 320–328. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.031. Shamsad, S. 2010 Assessment of irrigation water quality of Bogra District in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 34 (4). doi:10.3329/bjar.v34i4.5836. Shankar, S., Shikha, S. & Shanker, U. 2014 Arsenic contamination of groundwater: a review of sources, prevalence, health risks, and strategies for mitigation. The Scientific World Journal 304524,1–18. doi:10.1155/2014/304524. Smedley, P. L. & Kinniburgh, D. G. 2002 A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Applied Geochemistry 17 (5), 517–568. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5. Smith, R., Kent, D., Repert, D. & Böhlke, J. K. 2017 Anoxic nitrate reduction coupled with iron oxidation and attenuation of dissolved arsenic and phosphate in a sand and gravel aquifer. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 196, 102–120. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2016.09.025. Stollenwerk, K., Breit, G., Welch, A., Yount, J., Whitney, J., Foster, A., Uddin, M. N., Majumder, R. K. & Ahmed, N. 2007 Arsenic attenuation by oxidized aquifer sediments in Bangladesh. Science of the Total Environment 379 (2–3), 133–150. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.11.029. Sukhen, G., Rahman, A., Fuad, M., Dhiman, R. & Rahim, M. 2017 Groundwater quality assessment of Barishal city corporation in Bangladesh. Barisal University Journal 1 (4), 339–350. Sun, G. 2004 Arsenic contamination and arsenicosis in China. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 198 (3), 268–271. doi.10.1016/j.taap. 2003.10.017. Sutton, N. B., van der Kraan, G. M., van Loosdrecht, M. C., Muyzer, G., Bruining, J. & Schotting, R. J. 2009 Characterization of geochemical constituents and bacterial populations associated with As mobilization in deep and shallow tube wells in Bangladesh. Water Research 43 (6), 1720–1730. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.01.006. Swartz, C., Blute, N., Badruzzaman, A., Ali, A., Brabander, D., Jay, J., Besancon, J., Islam, S., Hemond, H. F. & Harvey, C. F. 2004 Mobility of arsenic in a Bangladesh aquifer: inferences from geochemical profiles, leaching data, and mineralogical characterization. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 69, 4539–4557. doi.10.1016/j.gca.2004.04.020. Talchabhadel, R., Nakagawa, H. & Kawaike, K. 2018 Sediment management in tidal river: a case study of East Beel Khuksia, Bangladesh. In: E3S Web of Conferences 40:02050. doi.10.1051/e3sconf/20184002050. Tyrovola, K., Nikolaidis, N., Veranis, N., Kallithrakas, N. & Koulouridakis, P. 2006 Arsenic removal from geothermal waters with zero-valent iron-Effect of temperature, phosphate and nitrate. Water Research 40 (12), 2375–2386. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.006. Uddin, S. & Kurosawa, K. 2010 Relationship of Carbon-Arsenic-Nitrogen in sediment with respect to arsenic release in groundwater in Bangladesh – a preliminary study. In Proceedings of International Conference on Environmental Aspects of Bangladesh (ICEAB10), Japan. Uddin, S. M. H., Mostafa, M. G. & Haque, A. B. M. H. 2011 Evaluation of groundwater quality and its suitability for drinking purpose in Rajshahi City, Bangladesh. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply 11 (5), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2011.079. UNICEF 2001 Arsenic Mitigation in Bangladesh. Available from: http://www.unicef.org/Arsenic UNICEF-BBS 2009 Bangladesh National Drinking Water Quality Survey. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics and UNICEF. van Geen, A., Ahmed, K., Akita, Y., Alam, M., Culligan, P., Feighery, J., Ferguson, A. S., Knappett, P., Layton, A. C., Mailloux, B. J., McKay, L. D., Mey, J. L., Serre, M. L., Streatfield, P. K., Wu, J. & Yunus, M. 2011 Fecal contamination of shallow tube-wells in Bangladesh inversely related to arsenic. Environmental Science and Technology 45 (4), 1199–1205. doi:10.1021/es103192b. Vishvas, H., Pankaj, C. & Anil, K. S. 2020 Arsenic toxicity: adverse effect and recent advance in microbes mediated bioremediation. Chapter 4. In: Microorganisms for Sustainable Environment and Health (Chowdhary, P., Raj, A., Verma, D. & Akhter, Y., eds), pp. 53–80. http:// 10.1016/B978-0-12-819001-2.00004-8 Vongphuthone, B., Kobayashi, M. & Igarashi, T. 2017 Factors affecting arsenic content of unconsolidated sediments and its mobilization in the Ishikari Plain, Hokkaido, Japan. Environmental Earth Sciences 76 (19), 645. doi10.1007/s12665-017-6993-y. Wang, S. & Mulligan, C. N. 2006 Occurrence of arsenic contamination in Canada: sources, behavior and distribution. Science of the Total Environment 366 (2–3), 701–721. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.005. WB 2017 Fertilizer Consumption-Kilograms Per Hectare of Arable Land. World Bank-IBRD-IDA. Available from: https://data.worldbank. org/indicator/AG.CON.FERT.ZS

AQUA — Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society Vol 00 No 0, 23

World Bank Group 2019 Multi-hazard groundwater risks to the drinking water supply in Bangladesh: challenges to achieving the sustainable development goals. Report No. WPS8922, Policy Research Working Paper, 8922, 3. Available from: http://documents.worldbank.org/ curated/en/ Yao, L., Min, X., Ke, Y., Wang, Y., Liang, Y. & Yan, X. 2019 Release behaviors of arsenic and heavy metals from arsenic sulﬁde sludge during simulated storage. Minerals 9 (2), 1–16. doi:10.3390/min9020130. Zahid, A. 2015 Groundwater Management Aspects in Bangladesh. Technical Report, Center for Water and Environment, Bangladesh Water Development Board. Zhang, L., Qin, X., Tang, J., Liu, W. & Yang, H. 2017 Review of arsenic geochemical characteristics and its signiﬁcance on arsenic pollution studies in karst groundwater, Southwest China. Applied Geochemistry 77,80–88. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2016.05.014. Zheng, Y., Stute, M., van Geen, A., Gavrieli, I., Dhar, R. & Simpson, H. J. 2004 Redox control of arsenic mobilization in Bangladesh groundwater. Applied Geochemistry 19 (2), 201–214. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2003.09.007. Zhu, F., Yang, M., Luo, Z., Hu, G.-R. & Yan, Y. 2020 Bioaccumulation and biotransformation of arsenic in Leptolyngbya boryana. Environmental Science & Pollution Research 27, 29993–30000. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-09294-y.

First received 16 February 2021; accepted in revised form 4 August 2021. Available online 2 September 2021

Downloaded from http://iwaponline.com/aqua/article-pdf/doi/10.2166/aqua.2021.043/929355/jws2021043.pdf?guestAccessKey=3101e41b-c033-4c5c-a3a1-55da9dd403ae by guest on 23 September 2021