Possibility of a Great Earthquake in the Tokai District, Central Japan
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
J. Phys. Earth, 25, Suppl., S 219-S 230, 1977 POSSIBILITY OF A GREAT EARTHQUAKE IN THE TOKAI DISTRICT, CENTRAL JAPAN Tokuji UTSU Departmentof EarthSciences, Faculty of Science, Nagoya University, Nagoya,Japan (ReceivedMarch 25, 1977) The Tokai districthas been consideredto be one of the probablesites of great interplateearthquakes in the near future.This idea isbased on the time seriesof historicalgreat earthquakes and the fairlyhigh rateof crustalmovement observed in thisregion for more than 80 years. The lastgreat earthquake was the Ansei earthquakeof 1854 (M=8.4). The westernhalf of the sourceregion of thisearth- quake rupturedagain in the 1944 Tonankai earthquake,but the easternhalf, i.e., theTokai district,remain unrupturedfor 122 years.The recurrencetime intervalof greatearthquakes in thisregion estimated from historicalearthquakes, topograph- icaland geologicalevidences, observed strain rates, the rateof plateconvergence, etc.varies from 120 yearsto more than 600 years. There are severalobservations which may suggestthat thisregion has alreadybeen in the long-termprecursory stage.However, itis questionable that these observations represent real precursors to the futureTokai earthquake. It seems possiblethat the next greatearthquake will occur south of the Izu Peninsula and will release the strain in the Tokai dis- trict. In any case, the Tokai district should be watched carefully for every con- ceivable precursors in order to make a successful prediction. 1. Introduction In the pastseveral years, the possibilityof a greatinterplate earthquake in the Tokai districthas been much discussedby Japanese earth scientists.The Tokai districtis a southern coastalregion of centralJapan (ShizuokaPrefecture and its vicinity)near thenorthern tip of the PhilippineSea plate(Fig. 1, rightbottom). In 1969,the Coordinating Committee forEarthquake Prediction,Japan (CCEP, Prof.T. Hagiwara, chairman) designatedthis region as 'theregion of specifiedobservation' for the follwing reasons. (1)Japan's history shows repeatedoccurrences of great earthquakesin thisregion. The lastone was theAnsei earthquakeof 1854 (M=8.4). (2)The analysisof two triangulationsurveys in 1886-87 and 1954-56 indicatesthat thisregion has been compressedconsiderably to the northwest(HARADA and IZAWA, 1969). This result,together with fairlyrapid subsidence of thewest coastof Suruga Bay observedsince 1889 (GEOGRAPHICAL SURVEY INSTITUTE,1970), seems to indicate the accumulationof considerableamount of strainin thisregion, which must be releasedby the futureTokai earthquake(MOGI, 1970). In 1973,the problem of the Tokai earthquakereceived much public attention through newspaperreports of the researchesby ANDO (1975a),RIKITAKE (1974),and S 219 S 220 T. UTSU others.In the background,there was a factthat the Nemuro-oki earthquakeof June 17, 1973 (M=7.4) occurredjust within one of the regionsof specifiedobservation designatedby the CCEP in 1970. The reasonsfor the designationwere very similar to the case of the Tokai district.In 1974,the CCEP upgraded the Tokai districtto 'theregion of intensifiedobservation .' In 1976,documents reportingthe effects of theAnsei earthquake along the coast of Suruga Bay were found by chance (EARTHQUAKE RESEARCH INSTITUTE,1977). The documents indicatethat the rupturezone of the Ansei earthquakeextended to the northernend of Suruga Bay (HATORI, 1976;ISHIBASHI, 1976). The importance of thisfact pointed out by Ishibashishocked the local people. The anomalous uplift in the Izu Peninsulasince 1975 (e.g.,TSUMURA, 1977)has alsobeen watched in re- lationto theTokai earthquake.Near theend of 1976,the GeodeticCouncil of Japan (Prof.T. Nagata, chairman) recommended the intensificationof various kinds of observationsand surveysin the Tokai districtto the government of Japan. The recommendation alsoincludes rapid collection of data by a monitoringcenter on the 24-hr basisand organizationof a specialcommittee forevaluating anomalous phenomena which may be short-termprecursors to the Tokai earthquake. This paper reviews the main informationand studiesin connectionwith the predictionof the Tokai earthquakeavailable as of January, 1977. The materials presentedto theCCEP's subcommitteefor the Tokai district(Prof. T. Asada, chair- man) were very usefulin preparingthis paper. 2. Tectonic Situation There is general agreement that the northern part of the Philippine Sea plate moving to the northwest relative to the Eurasia plate underthrusts at the Nankai trough. The great earthquakes along the Nankai trough are caused by the rebound of the compressed crust of the Japanese Islands (FITCH and SCHOLZ, 1971; KANAMORI, 1972; ANDO, 1975a, b). Near its eastern end, the Nankai trough bends to the north and enters into Suruga Bay. This part of the trough is sometimes called the Suruga trough. To the east, the Sagami trough defines the boundary of the two plates. The plate boundary is obscured between the Suruga and Sagami troughs. Collision of the Izu Peninsula with Honshu Island forms a zone of deformation around Mt. Fuji. The relative motion of the Philippine Sea plate to the Eurasia plate has been discussed by SENO (1976). According to his calculation, the pole of the relative motion is located at 45.3±3.7°N, 150.2±5.5°E near the southern Kurile Islands. The convergence rate at the Tokai district is about 3cm/yeat. ANDO (1975b) con- structed geodetic models for the fault dislocation of the 1944 Tonankai, 1854 Ansei, and 1707 Hoei earthquakes. The estimated dislocation for the 1944 and 1854 earth- quakes is 4m, and for the 1707 earthquake 8m. If the average dislocation is 4m at the Tokai district, the recurrence time will be about 130years. Since the part of the Philippine Sea plate near the Tokai district is not a simple oceanic plate, the pattern of the plate consumption may be complicated. As explained Possibility of a Great Earthquake in the Tokai District, Central Japan S 221 in the next section,source regions of some great earthquakes near the Tokai district seem to extend beyond the Nankai trough. Tectonic lineshave been assumed south of the Izu Peninsula as indicatedby broken linesin Fig.1 (rightbottom) along which thrust faultingmay take place (ISHIBASHI,1976; AOKI, 1977). However, no direct geophysical or geologicalevidence has been found to support such a hypothesis of multiple plateboundaries. 3. HistoricalEarthquakes Source regions(rupture zones) of largehistorical earthquakes along the Nankai and Sagami troughsare shown in Fig. 1. Except forthe 1923, 1944,and 1946 earth- quakes,the sourceregions have been estimatedfrom the descriptionof macroseismic effects,land deformations,and tsunamisin the historicalrecords. For olderevents, Fig.1. Historicalearthquakes along the Nankai and Sagami troughs,and volcaniceruptions probably related to them. Map scale,1:15,000,000. S 222 T. UTSU the delineationof the sourceregions is more speculativedue to fewerhistorical ma- terials.The years of greatearthquakes having magnitude 8 or more are indicated by largenumerals. There are 14 greatearthquakes occurring in nine epochslabeled [1],[2],..., [9]. Medium numerals in dashed ellipsesrepresent the approximate positionof earthquakesof magnitude 7 to 7.5. The dashed ellipsein epoch [9]indi- catesthe probable source region of the Tokai earthquakenow generallyassumed (e.g.,ISHIBASHI, 1976). Itis seen that the westernhalf of the sourceregion of the 1854 earthquakerup- turedagain in the 1944 earthquake,but the easternhalf remains unruptured for 122 years. The faultingof the 1707 earthquakealso extended into Suruga Bay, since Cape Omaezaki upheaved by about 1m at the time of the earthquake.However, it isnot certainthat the faultingreached the northernend of Suruga Bay as in thecase of the 1854 earthquake. It seems unlikelythat the source regionsof the 1605 Keicho and 1498 Meio earthquakescovered the Suruga Bay area. The shakingwas not so strongand no evidence of land deformationwas reportedin the Tokai district.However, the tsunamiswere very strongalong the Tokai coast. The tsunamiswere alsovery high in the Sagami Bay area and the Boso Peninsula. Hachijo Islandwas attackedby largetsunamis after the both earthquakes.Hachijo volcanoerupted 9 months after the 1605 earthquake.The othereruptions of Hachijo known in thehistory occurred in 1487, 1518,and 1522-23. These were fairlyclose to the 1498 earthquake. The 1605 earthquakehas been consideredto be two eventsoccurring simultaneously off Nankaido and offthe Boso Peninsula.However, the strongtsunami along the Tokai coastsuggests a possibilitythat the faultslipped slowly off the Tokai district.The sourceregion of the 1498 earthquakeshown in Fig.1 isthe one proposedby HATORI (1976).By studyingthe remainsof ancientboring shells, FUKUTOMI (1934,1938) inferredthat the southern Izu Peninsulaand Niijimaand ShikineIslands uplifted by a few metersseveral hundred years ago. The uplift maycorrespond to the 1498or 1605 earthquake. Itis likely that the faulting of the 1096Eicho earthquakeextended into Suruga Bay,because the tsunami was strongon thebay coast,though no materialsindicating theuplift of the coasthave been found. No directinformation is available indicating that the rupturezones of the 887 and 684 earthquakesreached to the Tokai district.The 887 earthquakewas a very big one, and itwas accompanied by a largeearthquake near Nagano (about 150km north of Mt. Fuji)on the same day. The largeeruptions of Mt. Fuji occurred in 1707, one and half months afterthe greatearthquake, and in 800-01 and 864-66. These eventsare marked in Fig. 1. Only three