Is German Onshore Wind Power in Crisis? an Analysis of Growth Trends, Barriers and Expectations for a Renewable Energy Technology at an Advanced Stage of Diffusion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Is German Onshore Wind Power in Crisis? an Analysis of Growth Trends, Barriers and Expectations for a Renewable Energy Technology at an Advanced Stage of Diffusion A thesis submitted to the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy of Central European University in part fulfilment of the Degree of Master of Science Is German Onshore Wind Power in Crisis? An analysis of growth trends, barriers and expectations for a renewable energy technology at an advanced stage of diffusion CEU eTD Collection Jens HONNEN June 9, 2020 Budapest Erasmus Mundus Masters Course in Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management MESPOM This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the Master of Science degree awarded as a result of successful completion of the Erasmus Mundus Masters course in Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management (MESPOM) jointly operated by the University of the Aegean (Greece), Central European University (Hungary), Lund University (Sweden) and the University of Manchester (United Kingdom). CEU eTD Collection ii Notes on copyright and the ownership of intellectual property rights: (1) Copyright in text of this thesis rests with the Author. Copies (by any process) either in full, or of extracts, may be made only in accordance with instructions given by the Author and lodged in the Central European University Library. Details may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. Further copies (by any process) of copies made in accordance with such instructions may not be made without the permission (in writing) of the Author. (2) The ownership of any intellectual property rights which may be described in this thesis is vested in the Central European University, subject to any prior agreement to the contrary, and may not be made available for use by third parties without the written permission of the University, which will prescribe the terms and conditions of any such agreement. (3) For bibliographic and reference purposes this thesis should be referred to as: Honnen, J. 2020. Is German Onshore Wind Power in Crisis? An analysis of growth trends, barriers and expectations for a renewable energy technology at an advanced stage of diffusion. Master of Science thesis, Central European University, Budapest. Further information on the conditions under which disclosures and exploitation may take place is available from the Head of the Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy, Central European University. CEU eTD Collection iii Author’s declaration No portion of the work referred to in this thesis has been submitted in support of an application for another degree or qualification of this or any other university or other institute of learning. Jens HONNEN CEU eTD Collection iv CENTRAL EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY ABSTRACT OF THESIS submitted by Jens HONNEN for the degree of Master of Science and entitled: Is German Onshore Wind Power in Crisis? An analysis of growth trends, barriers and expectations for a renewable energy technology at an advanced stage of diffusion Month and Year of submission: June 2020. As renewable energy technologies diffuse, they move through distinct growth stages with qualitatively different underlying challenges. While most existing research has focused on the early stages, the more advanced stages are less well understood. This thesis bridges this gap through an analysis of the recent slowdown in growth of onshore wind power in Germany – a renewable energy technology struggling in its later growth stages. On the basis of growth modelling, interviews, content and data analysis, three research objectives are pursued: (1) determining whether growth of onshore wind power is in persistent decline in Germany, (2) analysing the industry’s growth expectations to explain the wide-spread perception of the slowdown as a crisis and (3) identifying the underlying barriers to growth. The results find the technology’s long-term growth to be nearly linear, with no evidence of acceleration nor decline. The recent slowdown is mainly understood as a temporary fluctuation following the recent switch from feed-in tariffs to auctions. The crisis narrative is explained by the industry’s past growth experiences, its recent struggles, the perceived growth potential and normative scenarios for onshore wind power’s role in Germany’s energy transition. Future growth is unlikely to exceed the long-term growth rate of 3 GW, being limited by land constraints, political, institutional and social opposition, clashes with conservation and administrative barriers. Immediate action is required for lifting growth to the rates required by Germany’s climate targets. Understanding the identified growth challenges will also be essential to facilitate growth of other renewables at advanced stages of growth. CEU eTD Collection Keywords: onshore wind power, Germany, energy transition, technology diffusion, growth stages, barriers, transition studies, challenges, renewable energy v Acknowledgements I want to thank my supervisor, Aleh Cherp, for his continued support throughout my work on this thesis and the programme. Thank you for your guidance, clarity and humour – and most importantly for introducing me to the fascinating field of energy research. To my other supervisors, Johannes Schmidt and Jessica Jewell, thank you for all the encouragement and advice. Also, a big thank you to Vadim Vinichenko for supporting me with the data analysis. I would also like to express my gratitude to all my interviewees for being so generous with your time and helping a complete stranger with his master’s thesis. Special thanks go out to Jürgen Quentin from the Fachagentur Windenergie an Land for providing indispensable advice throughout my thesis. Also, thank you, Robert, for helping me find some of these people. Finally, I would like to thank all the people that are dearest to me – my friends and family. Most importantly, thank you, Maren, for your patience and support, and for bearing with me throughout all these long and stressful days. Finally, as my MESPOM years are coming to an end, I would like to thank my instructors – especially Alex, Alan and Laszlo – for all the learning and inspiration. And, last but not least, thank you to my fellow MESPOMers for all the experiences we now share. As you will now set out into the world – getting office jobs or saving elephants – I would like to leave you with this quote: “I see too many people, including scientists, now accepting climate1 breakdown as a ‘sad but done deal.’ This is the frog talking from its pot of heating water. Well I say no. My kids say no! Rage, rage against the dying of the light. Do not go gentle into that good night.” – Peter Kalmus CEU eTD Collection 1 Feel free to exchange this with ‘ecological breakdown’ ;-) vi Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1 2. Background on Onshore Wind Power in Germany’s Energiewende ............ 5 2.1. History and role of onshore wind power in Germany ........................................... 5 2.2. Realising a wind farm in Germany: The process and the actors involved ............ 8 2.3. Onshore wind power in trouble: Barriers to realisation ....................................... 11 2.3.1. Germany’s slowdown in onshore wind power growth: What it means and how it is perceived ....... 11 2.3.2. In search of scientific explanations for the 2018/2019 slowdown .............................................. 13 2.3.3. Existing research on challenges for onshore wind power .............................................................. 16 3. Theory & Methods ....................................................................................... 22 3.1. Theoretical framework and methodology ........................................................... 22 3.1.1. Analytical framework for understanding the diffusion of onshore wind power in Germany .......... 22 3.1.2. Multi-stage analysis of the barriers to onshore wind power development ...................................... 23 3.2. Research methods ............................................................................................... 25 3.2.1. Modelling capacity growth ......................................................................................................... 25 3.2.2. Interviews ................................................................................................................................. 27 3.2.3. Content analysis ....................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.4. Supplementary data analysis and consolidation of results ........................................................... 34 4. Results .......................................................................................................... 37 4.1. Has growth of onshore wind power capacity slowed down? .............................. 37 4.2. Why are there expectations for faster capacity growth? ...................................... 38 4.2.1. Results from the interviews ........................................................................................................ 38 4.2.2. Results from content analysis ..................................................................................................... 41 4.3. Why does capacity not grow as fast as expected? ............................................... 43 CEU eTD Collection 4.3.1. Results from interview data ....................................................................................................... 43 4.3.2. Results from content analysis ....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Optimizing the Visual Impact of Onshore Wind Farms Upon the Landscapes – Comparing Recent Planning Approaches in China and Germany
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum Dissertation Submission to the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Faculty of Geosciences For the degree of Doctor of natural sciences (Dr. rer. nat) Submitted by: Jinjin Guan. MLA Date of the oral examination: 16.07.2020 Examiners Dr. Thomas Held Prof. Dr. Harald Zepp Prof. Dr. Guotai Yan Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friederich Prof. Dr. Harro Stolpe Keywords Onshore wind farm planning; landscape; landscape visual impact evaluation; energy transition; landscape visual perception; GIS; Germany; China. I Abstract In this thesis, an interdisciplinary Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation (LVIE) model has been established in order to solve the conflicts between onshore wind energy development and landscape protection. It aims to recognize, analyze, and evaluate the visual impact of onshore wind farms upon landscapes and put forward effective mitigation measures in planning procedures. Based on literature research and expert interviews, wind farm planning regimes, legislation, policies, planning procedures, and permission in Germany and China were compared with each other and evaluated concerning their respective advantages and disadvantages. Relevant theories of landscape evaluation have been researched and integrated into the LVIE model, including the landscape connotation, landscape aesthetics, visual perception, landscape functions, and existing evaluation methods. The evaluation principles, criteria, and quantitative indicators are appropriately organized in this model with a hierarchy structure. The potential factors that may influence the visual impact have been collected and categorized into three dimensions: landscape sensitivity, the visual impact of WTs, and viewer exposure. Detailed sub-indicators are also designed under these three topics for delicate evaluation. Required data are collected from official platforms and databases to ensure the reliability and repeatability of the evaluation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning for Wind Energy
    Planning for Wind Energy Suzanne Rynne, AICP , Larry Flowers, Eric Lantz, and Erica Heller, AICP , Editors American Planning Association Planning Advisory Service Report Number 566 Planning for Wind Energy is the result of a collaborative part- search intern at APA; Kirstin Kuenzi is a research intern at nership among the American Planning Association (APA), APA; Joe MacDonald, aicp, was program development se- the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), the nior associate at APA; Ann F. Dillemuth, aicp, is a research American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), and Clarion associate and co-editor of PAS Memo at APA. Associates. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department The authors thank the many other individuals who con- of Energy under award number DE-EE0000717, as part of tributed to or supported this project, particularly the plan- the 20% Wind by 2030: Overcoming the Challenges funding ners, elected officials, and other stakeholders from case- opportunity. study communities who participated in interviews, shared The report was developed under the auspices of the Green documents and images, and reviewed drafts of the case Communities Research Center, one of APA’s National studies. Special thanks also goes to the project partners Centers for Planning. The Center engages in research, policy, who reviewed the entire report and provided thoughtful outreach, and education that advance green communities edits and comments, as well as the scoping symposium through planning. For more information, visit www.plan- participants who worked with APA and project partners to ning.org/nationalcenters/green/index.htm. APA’s National develop the outline for the report: James Andrews, utilities Centers for Planning conduct policy-relevant research and specialist at the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission; education involving community health, natural and man- Jennifer Banks, offshore wind and siting specialist at AWEA; made hazards, and green communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan Van Aken Stephan Albani Katrin Albsteiger Peter Altmaier Luise Amtsberg Kerstin Andreae Niels Annen Ingrid Arndt-Brauer Rain
    Hans-Joachim Zimmer Hofäckerstraße 36 71364 Winnenden 07195/138575 07195/138574 E-Mail [email protected] H.-J. Zimmer, Hofäckerstraße 36, 71364 Winnenden Einschreiben mit Rückschein Verwaltungsgericht Berlin Kirchstraße 7 10557 Berlin 31. Mai 2017 In der Rechtssache Hans-Joachim Zimmer - Kläger - Hofäckerstraße 36 71364 Winnenden gegen Bundesrepublik Deutschland - Beklagte - Deutscher Bundestag Gemeinschaftlich vertreten durch die Abgeordneten Jan van Aken Stephan Albani Katrin Albsteiger Peter Altmaier Luise Amtsberg Kerstin Andreae Niels Annen Ingrid Arndt-Brauer Rainer Arnold Artur Auernhammer Heike Baehrens Annalena Baerbock Ulrike Bahr Bettina Bähr-Losse Dorothee Bär 2 Heinz-Joachim Barchmann Thomas Bareiß Katarina Barley Doris Barnett Klaus Barthel Norbert Barthle Matthias Bartke Sören Bartol Dietmar Bartsch Bärbel Bas Günter Baumann Marieluise Beck Volker Beck Uwe Beckmeyer Maik Beermann Herbert Behrens Manfred Behrens Veronika Bellmann Sybille Benning André Berghegger Christoph Bergner Ute Bertram Peter Beyer Steffen Bilger Karin Binder Lothar Binding Clemens Binninger Matthias Birkwald Peter Bleser Burkhard Blienert Heidrun Bluhm Maria Böhmer Wolfgang Bosbach Norbert Brackmann Klaus Brähmig Michael Brand Reinhard Brandl Helmut Brandt Franziska Brantner Willi Brase Ralf Brauksiepe Helge Braun 3 Heike Brehmer Ralph Brinkhaus Agnieszka Brugger Karl-Heinz Brunner Christine Buchholz Eva Bulling-Schröter Edelgard Bulmahn Marco Bülow Martin Burkert Cajus Julius Caesar Lars Castellucci Roland Claus Gitta Connemann Jürgen Coße Petra Crone
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Storage in the German Energy Transition
    Electricity Storage in the German Energy Transition Analysis of the storage required in the power market, ancillary services market and the distribution grid STUDY Electricity Storage in the German Energy Transition IMPRINT SUMMARY OF STUDY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Electricity Storage in the German Energy Transition We would like to thank the members of the consultative Analysis of the storage required in the power market, group for their input to the discussions The results and ancillary services market and distribution grid conclusions do not necessarily represent the opinion of the members of the group. Responsibility lies ex- Study BY clusively with Agora Energiewende and the research Agora Energiewende institutions involved. The following institutions were Rosenstrasse 2 | 10178 Berlin | Germany represented in the advisory group: 50Hertz Transmission GmbH | Bavarian Ministry of Project leaders: Economic Affairs and Media, Energy and Technology | Daniel Fürstenwerth Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft [email protected] e.V. (Federal Association of the German Energy and Lars Waldmann Water Industries) | Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz [email protected] Deutschland e.V.( German Federation for Environment Editor: and Nature Conservation) | Federal Ministry for Eco- Mara Marthe Kleiner nomic Affairs and Energy | Bundesverband Energie- speicher e.V. (Germany Energy Storage Association) | ANALYSIS BY Dena (German Energy Agency) | Deutsche Umwelthilfe Coordination of analysis, assumptions and
    [Show full text]
  • Vorstände Der Parlamentariergruppen in Der 18. Wahlperiode
    1 Vorstände der Parlamentariergruppen in der 18. Wahlperiode Deutsch-Ägyptische Parlamentariergruppe Vorsitz: Karin Maag (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Dr. h.c. Edelgard Bulmahn (SPD) stv. Vors.: Heike Hänsel (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Dr. Franziska Brantner (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Parlamentariergruppe Arabischsprachige Staaten des Nahen Ostens (Bahrain, Irak, Jemen, Jordanien, Katar, Kuwait, Libanon, Oman, Saudi Arabien, Syrien, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Arbeitsgruppe Palästina) Vorsitz: Michael Hennrich (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Gabriele Groneberg (SPD) stv. Vors.: Heidrun Bluhm (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Luise Amtsberg (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Parlamentariergruppe ASEAN (Brunei, Indonesien, Kambodscha, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippinen, Singapur, Thailand, Vietnam) Vorsitz: Dr. Thomas Gambke (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) stv. Vors.: Dr. Michael Fuchs (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Johann Saathoff (SPD) stv. Vors.: Caren Lay (DIE LINKE.) Deutsch-Australisch-Neuseeländische Parlamentariergruppe (Australien, Neuseeland, Ost-Timor) Vorsitz: Volkmar Klein(CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Rainer Spiering (SPD) stv. Vors.: Cornelia Möhring (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Anja Hajduk (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Deutsch-Baltische Parlamentariergruppe (Estland, Lettland, Litauen) Vorsitz: Alois Karl (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: René Röspel (SPD) stv. Vors.: Dr. Axel Troost (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Dr. Konstantin von Notz (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Deutsch-Belarussische Parlamentariergruppe Vorsitz: Oliver Kaczmarek (SPD) stv. Vors.: Dr. Johann Wadephul (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Andrej Hunko (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: N.N. (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) 2 Deutsch-Belgisch-Luxemburgische Parlamentariergruppe (Belgien, Luxemburg) Vorsitz: Patrick Schnieder (CDU/CSU) stv. Vors.: Dr. Daniela de Ridder (SPD) stv. Vors.: Katrin Werner (DIE LINKE.) stv. Vors.: Corinna Rüffer (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) Parlamentariergruppe Bosnien und Herzegowina Vorsitz: Marieluise Beck (BÜNDNIS 90/DIE GRÜNEN) stv.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore
    sustainability Article Factors Affecting the Community Acceptance of Onshore Wind Farms: A Case Study of the Zhongying Wind Farm in Eastern China Jinjin Guan * and Harald Zepp Institute of Geography, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 August 2020; Accepted: 21 August 2020; Published: 25 August 2020 Abstract: The conflict between wind energy expansion and local environmental protection has attracted attention from society and initiated a fierce discussion about the community acceptance of wind farms. There are various empirical studies on factors affecting the public acceptance of wind farms, but little concerning the correlation and significance of factors, especially in a close distance to the wind farms. This paper aims to identify, classify, and analyze the factors affecting community acceptance through literature review, questionnaire, variance analysis, and linear regression analysis. A total of 169 questionnaires was conducted in 17 villages around the Zhongying Wind Farm in Zhejiang Province, China. The factors are categorized into four groups: Location-related factors, demographic factors, environmental impact factors, and public participation factors. Through the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regression analysis, the outcome shows the universal rule of community acceptance under the Chinese social background. Finally, recommendations for improving wind farm planning procedures are put forward. Keywords: onshore wind farm; community acceptance; wind energy planning; environmental impact; public participation; analysis of variance (ANOVA); regression analysis 1. Introduction Wind energy is recognized as a major renewable energy source alternative. It helps reducing CO2 emission and mitigating climate change due to its high performance, wide resource distribution, and competitive prices.
    [Show full text]
  • Das Versprechen Einhalten!
    Das Versprechen einhalten! Aufruf zu einem fraktionsübergreifenden entwicklungspolitischen Konsens zur Erreichung des 0,7%-Ziels Das Versprechen der Industrienationen, 0,7 Prozent ihres Bruttonationaleinkommens mit den Ärmsten der Armen zu teilen und für Entwicklungszusammenarbeit und humanitäre Hilfe zur Verfügung zu stellen, ist mehr als 40 Jahre alt. Insbesondere die Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union haben dieses Versprechen bekräftigt und konkretisiert und sich 2005 selbst verpflichtet, das 0,7%-Ziel spätestens 2015 zu erreichen. Es wurden auch verbindliche Zwischenziele festgelegt. So hätte Deutschland zum Beispiel bis 2010 eine ODA-Quote von mindestens 0,51% erreichen sollen. Wir müssen zur Kenntnis nehmen, dass Deutschland dieses Zwischenziel nicht erreicht hat. Seitdem es das 0,7%-Ziel gibt, haben sich bisher alle Bundesregierungen zwar grundsätzlich dazu bekannt – aber nie die Finanzmittel in den Haushalt eingestellt, die dem Pfad zur Erreichung dieses Ziels entsprochen hätten. Gleiches gilt für die jetzige Bundesregierung. Vor dem Hintergrund der unbefriedigenden ODA-Bilanz aller bisherigen und der jetzigen Bundesregierungen rufen wir dazu auf, von gegenseitigen Schuldzuweisungen abzusehen und es künftig gemeinsam besser zu machen. Das Beispiel Großbritannien zeigt, dass es möglich ist, die Erreichung des 0,7%-Ziels aus den parteipolitischen Auseinandersetzungen herauszuholen und einen breiten entwicklungspolitischen Konsens im Parlament zu erzielen, der auch von der Mehrheit der Bevölkerung begrüßt wird. Trotz Wirtschafts-
    [Show full text]
  • Deutscher Bundestag
    Deutscher Bundestag 178. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Donnerstag, 10.Mai 2012 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 2 Beschlussempfehlung des Ausschusses für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit (16. Ausschuss) zu dem Antrag der Abgeordneten Frank Schwabe, Ingrid Arndt-Brauer, Dirk Becker, weiterer Abgeordneter und der Fraktion der SPD über Leitlinien für Tranzparenz und Umweltverträglichkeit bei der Förderung von unkonventionellem Erdgas - Drucksachen 17/7612 und 17/9450 - Abgegebene Stimmen insgesamt: 553 Nicht abgegebene Stimmen: 67 Ja-Stimmen: 301 Nein-Stimmen: 192 Enthaltungen: 60 Ungültige: 0 Berlin, den 10. Mai. 12 Beginn: 19:26 Ende: 19:29 Seite: 1 Seite: 1 CDU/CSU Ja Nein Enthaltung Ungült. Nicht abg.Name Ilse Aigner X Peter Altmaier X Peter Aumer X Dorothee Bär X Thomas Bareiß X Norbert Barthle X Günter Baumann X Ernst-Reinhard Beck (Reutlingen) X Manfred Behrens (Börde) X Veronika Bellmann X Dr. Christoph Bergner X Peter Beyer X Steffen Bilger X Clemens Binninger X Peter Bleser X Dr. Maria Böhmer X Wolfgang Börnsen (Bönstrup) X Wolfgang Bosbach X Norbert Brackmann X Klaus Brähmig X Michael Brand X Dr. Reinhard Brandl X Helmut Brandt X Dr. Ralf Brauksiepe X Dr. Helge Braun X Heike Brehmer X Ralph Brinkhaus X Cajus Caesar X Gitta Connemann X Alexander Dobrindt X Thomas Dörflinger X Marie-Luise Dött X Dr. Thomas Feist X Enak Ferlemann X Ingrid Fischbach X Hartwig Fischer (Göttingen) X Dirk Fischer (Hamburg) X Axel E. Fischer (Karlsruhe-Land) X Dr. Maria Flachsbarth X Klaus-Peter Flosbach X Herbert Frankenhauser X Dr. Hans-Peter Friedrich (Hof) X Michael Frieser X Erich G.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America Fy08 Activities Summary
    WIND POWERING AMERICA FY08 ACTIVITIES SUMMARY Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY08 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2008, there were more than 16,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 7,000 MW projected by year end, bringing the U.S. installed capacity to more than 23,000 MW by the end of 2008. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Twenty-two states now have more than 100 MW installed, compared to 17 at the end of 2007. We anticipate that four or five additional states will join the 100-MW club in 2009, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. Of course, the 20% Wind Energy by 2030 report (developed by AWEA, the U.S. Department of Energy, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and other stakeholders) indicates that 44 states may be in the 100-MW club by 2030, and 33 states will have more than 1,000 MW installed (at the end of 2008, there were six states in that category).
    [Show full text]
  • 07/2018 REFORM of the RENEWABLE ENERGY DIRECTIVE a Brake on the European Energy Transition?
    DISKURS 07/ 2018 Uwe Nestle REFORM OF THE RENEWABLE ENERGY DIRECTIVE A Brake On The European Energy Transition? WISO DISKURS 07/ 2018 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung The Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) is the oldest political foundation in Germany with a rich tradition dating back to its foundation in 1925. Today, it remains loyal to the legacy of its namesake and campaigns for the core ideas and values of social democracy: freedom, justice and solidarity. It has a close connection to social democracy and free trade unions. FES promotes the advancement of social democracy, in particular by: – Political educational work to strengthen civil society; – Think Tanks; – International cooperation with our international network of offices in more than 100 countries; – Support for talented young people; – Maintaining the collective memory of social democracy with archives, libraries and more. The Division for Economic and Social Policy The Division for Economic and Social Policy of the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung advises and informs politics and society in Germany about important current issues and policy making concerning social, economic and environmental developments. WISO Diskurs WISO Diskurs are detailed analyses examining political issues and questions, containing sound policy recommendations and contributing to scientifically based policy consultation. About the author Uwe Nestle is the founder of EnKliP (Energy and Climate Policy I Contracting). He served in the German Federal Environment Ministry for about ten years, working on the energy transition and in particular renewable energy. Responsible for this Publication at FES Dr. Philipp Fink is head of the sustainable structural policy working group and the climate, environment, energy and structural policy desk in the Division for Economic and Social Policy at Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
    [Show full text]
  • Maine Wind Energy Development Assessment
    MAINE WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT Report & Recommendations – 2012 Prepared by Governor’s Office of Energy Independence and Security March 2012 Acknowledgements The Office of Energy Independence and Security would like to thank all the contributing state agencies and their staff members who provided us with assistance and information, especially Mark Margerum at the Maine Department of Environmental Protection and Marcia Spencer-Famous and Samantha Horn-Olsen at the Land Use Regulation Commission. Jeff Marks, Deputy Director of the Governor’s Office of Energy Independence and Security (OEIS) served as the primary author and manager of the Maine Wind Energy Development Assessment. Special thanks to Hugh Coxe at the Land Use Regulation Commission for coordination of the Cumulative Visual Impact (CVI) study group and preparation of the CVI report. Coastal Enterprises, Inc. (CEI), Perkins Point Energy Consulting and Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. prepared the economic and energy information and data needed to permit the OEIS to formulate substantive recommendations based on the Maine Wind Assessment 2012, A Report (January 31, 2012). We appreciate the expertise and professional work performed by Stephen Cole (CEI), Stephen Ward (Perkins Point) and Robert Fagan (Synapse.). Michael Barden with the Governor’s Office of Energy Independence and Security assisted with the editing. Jon Doucette, Woodard & Curran designed the cover. We appreciate the candid advice, guidance and information provided by the organizations and individuals consulted by OEIS and those interviewed for the 2012 wind assessment and cited in Attachment 1 of the accompanying Maine Wind Assessment 2012, A Report. Kenneth C. Fletcher Director Governor’s Office of Energy Independence and Security 2 Table of contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Megatrends in the Global Energy Transition
    Megatrends in the global energy transition Legal notice Published by WWF Germany and LichtBlick SE November 2015 Author Gerd Rosenkranz Data verification Jürgen Quentin Coordination Viviane Raddatz/WWF Germany Corine Veithen/LichtBlick SE Edited by Gerd Rosenkranz, Jürgen Quentin, LichtBlick, WWF Germany Contact [email protected] [email protected] Design Thomas Schlembach/WWF Germany Infographics Anita Drbohlav/www.paneemadesign.com Production Maro Ballach/WWF Germany The leading renewable energy supplier LichtBlick and the conservation organisation WWF Germany are working together to speed up the energy transition in Germany. They pursue a common aim of inspiring people for change and of drawing attention to the enormous opportunities for a renewable energy future. www.energiewendebeschleunigen.de Introduction It was a surprising statement for an important summit: in Schloss Elmau, Bavaria at the beginning of June 2015, the G7 heads of state and government announced the global withdrawal from the carbon economy. As the century progresses, the world must learn to do without lignite, coal, oil and natural gas completely. In truth this aim is not only urgently needed in order to stem the dangers of climate change, but also achievable. The energy transition has become a massive global force, expansion of renewables is making progress worldwide faster than even the optimists believed a few years ago. This report provides wide-ranging evidence that the global conversion of the energy system has started and is currently accelerating rapidly. It shows that renewable energies – and solar energy in particular – have undergone an unparalleled development: from a niche technology rejected as being too expensive to a global competitor for fossil and nuclear power plants.
    [Show full text]