Part 1 Detailed Breakdown of Contact Information of the Survey and Calculation of Overall Response Rate

Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 1 Calculation of overall response rate Overall Response Rate = Successful cases Successful cases + Incomplete cases + Refusal cases by eligible respondents ^ + Refusal cases by prorated-eligible respondents*

= 1,020 1,020 + 35 + 4 +479[(1,020 + 35 + 4) / (1,020+ 35 + 4 + 302)]

= 71.2%

^ Including “household-level refusal” and “known respondent refusal”. *Figure obtained by prorata.

Table 2 Detailed breakdown of contact information of the survey

Frequency Percentage Respondents’ ineligibility confirmed 1,110 22.0 Fax/ data line 73 1.4 Invalid number 564 11.2 Call-forwarding/ mobile/ pager number 17 0.3 Non-residential number 64 1.3 Special technological difficulties 90 1.8 No eligible respondents 302 6.0

Respondents’ eligibility not confirmed 1,862 36.9 Line busy 119 2.4 No answer 1,038 20.6 Answering device 20 0.4 Call-blocking 129 2.6 Language problem 75 1.5 Interview terminated before the screening question 479 9.5 Others 2 0.0

Respondents’ eligibility confirmed, but failed to complete the interview 1,049 20.8 Household-level refusal 3 0.1 Known respondent refusal 1 0.0 Appointment date beyond the fieldwork period 1,006 20.0 Partial interview 35 0.7 Miscellaneous 4 0.1

Successful cases 1,020 20.2

Total 5,041 100.0

AppendixII-1 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Part 2 General Questions

Table 3a If the Legislative Council elections were to be held tomorrow, and you had the right to vote, which candidate or list would you vote for？(Interviewers read out the names of candidates who would stand for elections, A11 and A12. The random order of the names would be displayed on the computer. Only one answer is allowed. )

Frequency Percentage Leung Yiu Chung of NWS 58 11.7 Selina Chow of LP 51 10.2 Lee Wing Tat of DP 45 9.0 Tam Yiu Chung of DAB 45 8.9 Any list from the pro-democracy camp 43 8.7 Lee Cheuk Yan of HKCTU 40 8.1 Albert Ho of DP 37 7.4 Albert Chan of pro-democracy camp 22 4.5 Any list from the pro-China camp 7 1.4 Tang Siu Tong of DAB 6 1.1 Cheung Yin Tung of DP 1 0.3 Cheung Hok Ming of HYK 1 0.1 Cast blank votes / Elect nobody 17 3.3 Won’t vote 29 5.9

Not yet decide/Don’t know/Hard to say 98 19.6 Total 501 100.0 Missing 6

AppendixII-2 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 3b 【Excluding those respondents answered “Depend on the overall team-up and will not vote for a specific candidate”, “Cast blank votes / Elect nobody” and “Not yet decide/Don’t know/Hard to say”】 If the Legislative Council elections were to be held tomorrow, and you had the right to vote, which candidate or list would you vote for？(Interviewers read out the names of candidates who would stand for elections, A11 and A12. The random order of the names would be displayed on the computer. Only one answer is allowed. )

Frequency Percentage Leung Yiu Chung of NWS 58 16.4 Selina Chow of LP 51 14.3 Lee Wing Tat of DP 45 12.6 Tam Yiu Chung of DAB 45 12.5 Any list from the pro-democracy camp 43 12.2 Lee Cheuk Yan of HKCTU 40 11.3 Albert Ho of DP 37 10.4 Albert Chan of pro-democracy camp 22 6.3 Any list from the pro-China camp 7 1.9 Tang Siu Tong of DAB 6 1.6 Cheung Yin Tung of DP 1 0.4 Cheung Hok Ming of HYK 1 0.2 Total 357 100.0 Missing 6

AppendixII-3 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 4 Hypothetical joint vote share (1st choice) attained by potential candidates after teaming up any two. Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM APD APC LYC 26.8% 29.0% 16.8% 27.7% 22.7% 30.7% 28.9% 18.0% 16.6% 28.6% 18.3% AH 26.8% 23.0% 10.8% 21.7% 16.7% 24.7% 22.9% 12.0% 10.6% 22.6% 12.3% LWT 29.0% 23.0% 13.0% 23.9% 18.9% 26.9% 25.1% 14.2% 12.8% 24.8% 14.5% CYT 16.8% 10.8% 13.0% 11.7% 6.7% 14.7% 12.9% 2.0% 0.6% 12.6% 2.3% LCK 27.7% 21.7% 23.9% 11.7% 17.6% 25.6% 23.8% 12.9% 11.5% 23.5% 13.2% AC 22.7% 16.7% 18.9% 6.7% 17.6% 20.6% 18.8% 7.9% 6.5% 18.5% 8.2% SC 30.7% 24.7% 26.9% 14.7% 25.6% 20.6% 26.8% 15.9% 14.5% 26.5% 16.2% TYC 28.9% 22.9% 25.1% 12.9% 23.8% 18.8% 26.8% 14.1% 12.7% 24.7% 14.4% TST 18.0% 12.0% 14.2% 2.0% 12.9% 7.9% 15.9% 14.1% 1.8% 13.8% 3.5% CHM 16.6% 10.6% 12.8% 0.6% 11.5% 6.5% 14.5% 12.7% 1.8% 12.4% 2.1%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 28.6% 22.6% 24.8% 12.6% 23.5% 18.5% 26.5% 24.7% 13.8% 12.4% 14.1% APC 18.3% 12.3% 14.5% 2.3% 13.2% 8.2% 16.2% 14.4% 3.5% 2.1% 14.1%

Initials: [A1] Leung Yiu Chung of NWS LYC [A2] Albert Ho of DP AH [A3] Lee Wing Tat of DP LWT [A4] Cheung Yin Tung of DP CYT [A5] Lee Cheuk Yan of HKCTU LCK [A6] Albert Chan of pro-democracy camp AC [A7] Selina Chow of LP SC [A8] Tam Yiu Chung of DAB TYC [A9] Tang Siu Tong of DAB TST [A10] Cheung Hok Ming of HYK CHM [A11] Any list from the pro-democracy camp APD [A12] Any list from the pro-China camp APC

* This table is for rough reference only. It must be stated that, the calculation of the joint vote share was based on a mere summation of individual vote shares obtained by each candidate or list within a team. In real-life situations, some of the team-ups may be quite unlikely. Also, while people’s voting behaviours are highly unpredicatable, the summation of individual vote shares obtained by each candidate or list within a team may not necessarily reflect the joint vote shares of those candidates or lists after the team-ups.

AppendixII-4 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 5 Vote share obtained by each candidate if the respondents’ first choice dropped out from elections. Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 17.9% 19.3% 16.2% 19.5% 17.5% 18.6% 18.3% 16.5% 16.3% AH 11.2% 14.2% 10.6% 13.6% 11.3% 11.8% 11.9% 10.5% 10.4% LWT 15.0% 14.8% 12.6% 14.2% 14.1% 13.9% 13.7% 12.8% 12.6% CYT 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 17.0% 13.4% 13.1% 11.2% 11.8% 12.1% 11.6% 11.6% 11.2% AC 7.2% 7.7% 8.0% 6.2% 7.4% 8.0% 7.0% 6.3% 6.2% SC 19.0% 15.6% 15.3% 14.3% 14.7% 15.2% 17.4% 14.5% 14.3% TYC 13.5% 12.8% 12.8% 12.6% 13.3% 13.5% 17.8% 13.1% 12.6% TST 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.8% 4.7% 2.0% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 12.7% 13.6% 13.1% 12.0% 12.7% 12.1% 13.0% 12.5% 12.2% 12.1% APC 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.3% 2.0% 2.0%

First choice Second choice * Reading method: This table’s horizontal-axis and vertical-axis indicate the respondents’ first choices and second choices respectively, while the shaded area indicates the absence of a specific candidate or a list. In other words, the first column of this table shows the vote shares obtained by other candidates if Leung Yiu Chung dropped out. (For example, Albert Ho would obtain 11.2% of vote share and Lee Wing Tat would obtain 15.0% of vote share, etc.).

AppendixII-5 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 6 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Leung Yiu Chung and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC AH 14.9% 11.5% 17.0% 12.8% 12.8% 13.0% 11.4% 11.2% LWT 18.3% 14.9% 18.8% 16.9% 17.4% 16.4% 15.2% 15.0% CYT 0.3% 0.3% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 19.5% 19.1% 17.0% 18.0% 19.5% 17.9% 17.5% 17.0% AC 9.3% 8.8% 7.2% 10.4% 9.5% 8.2% 7.3% 7.2% SC 20.6% 18.6% 19.0% 19.9% 20.3% 23.3% 19.2% 19.0% TYC 13.7% 12.5% 13.5% 15.2% 14.5% 21.0% 14.0% 13.5% TST 1.7% 1.6% 2.0% 2.1% 2.0% 3.0% 4.8% 2.0% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 14.2% 12.5% 12.6% 13.7% 12.8% 13.7% 13.3% 12.8% 12.7% APC 2.0% 11.4% 2.0% 2.1% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% 2.0%

* Reading method: The table’s shaded area indicates the absence of a specific candidate or a list. For example, the second column of this table shows the vote shares obtained by other candidates if both Leung Yiu Chung and Albert Ho dropped out. (For example, Lee Wing Tat would obtain 18.3% of vote share and Cheung Yin Tung would obtain 0.3% of vote share, etc.).

AppendixII-6 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 7 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Albert Ho and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 22.0% 17.8% 22.7% 20.1% 20.4% 20.2% 18.1% 17.9% AH LWT 18.3% 14.7% 18.4% 17.0% 17.7% 16.1% 14.9% 14.8% CYT 0.3% 1.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 19.5% 15.9% 13.6% 14.1% 15.0% 14.0% 13.8% 13.4% AC 9.3% 11.0% 7.6% 9.8% 9.6% 8.6% 7.8% 7.7% SC 20.6% 17.4% 15.6% 16.4% 16.7% 19.0% 15.8% 15.6% TYC 13.7% 13.0% 12.7% 13.8% 13.8% 18.0% 13.2% 12.8% TST 1.7% 1.7% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.8% 4.8% 2.0% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 14.2% 14.8% 13.6% 14.4% 13.8% 14.7% 14.3% 13.8% 13.6% APC 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% 2.0%

AppendixII-7 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 8 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Lee Wing Tat and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 22.0% 19.3% 23.2% 21.3% 21.8% 21.5% 19.5% 19.3% AH 14.9% 14.4% 18.3% 16.1% 16.7% 15.9% 14.4% 14.2% LWT CYT 0.3% 1.7% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 19.1% 15.9% 13.0% 14.1% 14.3% 13.9% 13.5% 13.1% AC 8.8% 11.0% 7.9% 9.7% 10.4% 8.8% 8.0% 8.0% SC 18.6% 17.4% 15.3% 16.3% 16.4% 18.6% 15.5% 15.3% TYC 12.5% 13.0% 12.7% 13.5% 13.8% 17.9% 13.2% 12.8% TST 1.6% 1.7% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.8% 4.7% 2.0% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 12.5% 14.8% 13.0% 14.3% 13.5% 14.0% 13.6% 13.2% 13.1% APC 11.4% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% 2.0%

AppendixII-8 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 9 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Cheung Yin Tung and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 17.8% 19.3% 19.5% 17.4% 18.6% 18.3% 16.5% 16.2% AH 11.5% 14.4% 13.8% 11.5% 12.1% 12.2% 10.8% 10.6% LWT 14.9% 14.7% 14.1% 14.0% 13.9% 13.6% 12.8% 12.6% CYT LCK 17.0% 13.6% 13.0% 11.8% 12.1% 11.6% 11.6% 11.2% AC 7.2% 7.6% 7.9% 7.3% 8.0% 7.0% 6.3% 6.2% SC 19.0% 15.6% 15.3% 14.7% 15.2% 17.4% 14.5% 14.3% TYC 13.5% 12.7% 12.7% 13.3% 13.5% 17.7% 13.1% 12.6% TST 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.3% 2.2% 2.1% 4.9% 2.2% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 12.6% 13.6% 13.0% 12.7% 12.1% 13.0% 12.5% 12.2% 12.0% APC 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.3% 2.0% 2.0%

AppendixII-9 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 10 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Lee Cheuk Yan and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 22.7% 23.2% 19.5% 21.4% 22.1% 21.8% 19.8% 19.5% AH 17.0% 18.3% 13.8% 14.6% 15.2% 15.3% 13.8% 13.6% LWT 18.8% 18.4% 14.1% 16.3% 15.8% 15.3% 14.7% 14.2% CYT 0.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK AC 10.4% 9.8% 9.7% 7.3% 9.3% 8.3% 7.5% 7.4% SC 19.9% 16.4% 16.3% 14.7% 15.7% 18.0% 14.9% 14.7% TYC 15.2% 13.8% 13.5% 13.3% 14.3% 18.8% 13.8% 13.3% TST 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 2.3% 2.3% 2.1% 5.0% 2.3% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 13.7% 14.4% 14.3% 12.7% 12.9% 13.7% 13.3% 12.9% 12.7% APC 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% 2.0%

AppendixII-10 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 11 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Albert Chan and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 20.1% 21.3% 17.4% 21.4% 20.2% 20.0% 17.9% 17.5% AH 12.8% 16.1% 11.5% 14.6% 13.0% 12.9% 11.4% 11.3% LWT 16.9% 17.0% 14.0% 16.3% 15.7% 15.6% 14.2% 14.1% CYT 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 18.0% 14.1% 14.1% 11.8% 13.0% 12.4% 12.3% 11.8% AC SC 20.3% 16.7% 16.4% 15.2% 15.7% 18.5% 15.4% 15.2% TYC 14.5% 13.8% 13.8% 13.5% 14.3% 19.3% 14.0% 13.5% TST 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.2% 2.3% 2.1% 5.0% 2.3% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.6% 0.3% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 12.8% 13.8% 13.5% 12.1% 12.9% 13.3% 12.6% 12.3% 12.1% APC 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0% 2.0%

AppendixII-11 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 12 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Selina Chow and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 20.4% 21.8% 18.6% 22.1% 20.2% 22.3% 18.9% 18.6% AH 12.8% 16.7% 12.1% 15.2% 13.0% 14.2% 12.0% 11.8% LWT 17.4% 17.7% 13.9% 15.8% 15.7% 15.8% 14.1% 13.9% CYT 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 19.5% 15.0% 14.3% 12.1% 13.0% 13.5% 12.6% 12.1% AC 9.5% 9.6% 10.4% 8.0% 9.3% 9.4% 8.1% 8.0% SC TYC 21.0% 18.0% 17.9% 17.7% 18.8% 19.3% 18.3% 17.8% TST 3.0% 1.8% 1.8% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 6.8% 2.1% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.6% 0.6% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 13.7% 14.7% 14.0% 13.0% 13.7% 13.3% 14.2% 13.2% 13.0% APC 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.9% 2.4% 2.4%

AppendixII-12 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 13 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Tam Yiu Chung and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 20.2% 21.5% 18.3% 21.8% 20.0% 22.3% 18.8% 18.3% AH 13.0% 15.9% 12.2% 15.3% 12.9% 14.2% 12.2% 11.9% LWT 16.4% 16.1% 13.6% 15.3% 15.6% 15.8% 14.0% 13.7% CYT 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 17.9% 14.0% 13.9% 11.6% 12.4% 13.5% 12.5% 11.6% AC 8.2% 8.6% 8.8% 7.0% 8.3% 9.4% 7.1% 7.0% SC 23.3% 19.0% 18.6% 17.4% 18.0% 18.5% 19.6% 17.4% TYC TST 4.8% 4.8% 4.7% 4.9% 5.0% 5.0% 6.8% 4.9% CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.6% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 13.3% 14.3% 13.6% 12.5% 13.3% 12.6% 14.2% 12.8% 12.5% APC 2.4% 2.4% 2.4% 2.3% 2.4% 2.4% 2.9% 2.4% 2.3%

AppendixII-13 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 14 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Tang Siu Tong and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 18.1% 19.5% 16.5% 19.8% 17.9% 18.9% 18.8% 16.4% AH 11.4% 14.4% 10.8% 13.8% 11.4% 12.0% 12.2% 10.5% LWT 15.2% 14.9% 12.8% 14.7% 14.2% 14.1% 14.0% 13.3% CYT 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 17.5% 13.8% 13.5% 11.6% 12.3% 12.6% 12.5% 11.6% AC 7.3% 7.8% 8.0% 6.3% 7.5% 8.1% 7.1% 6.2% SC 19.2% 15.8% 15.5% 14.5% 14.9% 15.4% 19.6% 14.4% TYC 14.0% 13.2% 13.2% 13.1% 13.8% 14.0% 18.3% 13.3% TST CHM 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3%

New Territories West West New Territories APD 12.8% 13.8% 13.2% 12.2% 12.9% 12.3% 13.2% 12.8% 12.1% APC 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4% 2.0%

AppendixII-14 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 15 Vote share obtained by each candidate if two of them dropped out from elections (Cheung Hok Ming and another one dropped out). Candidate / List LYC AH LWT CYT LCK AC SC TYC TST CHM LYC 17.9% 19.3% 16.2% 19.5% 17.5% 18.6% 18.3% 16.4% AH 11.2% 14.2% 10.6% 13.6% 11.3% 11.8% 11.9% 10.5% LWT 15.0% 14.8% 12.6% 14.2% 14.1% 13.9% 13.7% 13.3% CYT 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% LCK 17.0% 13.4% 13.1% 11.2% 11.8% 12.1% 11.6% 11.6% AC 7.2% 7.7% 8.0% 6.2% 7.4% 8.0% 7.0% 6.2% SC 19.0% 15.6% 15.3% 14.3% 14.7% 15.2% 17.4% 14.4% TYC 13.5% 12.8% 12.8% 12.6% 13.3% 13.5% 17.8% 13.3% TST 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.2% 2.3% 2.3% 2.1% 4.9% CHM

New Territories West West New Territories APD 12.7% 13.6% 13.1% 12.0% 12.7% 12.1% 13.0% 12.5% 12.1% APC 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.4% 2.3% 2.0%

AppendixII-15 Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 16 If [choice in Q1] dropped out from elections, which one of them above would you vote for？(Interviewer can remind the respondents of names of remaining candidates or parties. Only one answer is allowed.)

Percentage of Percentage of respondents total sample Frequency （Base=306）（Base=507） Leung Yiu Chung of NWS 39 12.9 7.8 Lee Cheuk Yan of HKCTU 37 12.2 7.3 Albert Ho of DP 37 12.0 7.3 Selina Chow of LP 35 11.6 7.0 Lee Wing Tat of DP 28 9.0 5.4 Albert Chan of pro-democracy camp 24 7.8 4.7 Tam Yiu Chung of DAB 23 7.5 4.6 Tang Siu Tong of DAB 13 4.3 2.6 Any list from the pro-democracy camp 11 3.8 2.3 Any list from the pro-China camp 2 0.6 0.4 Depend on the overall team-up and will not 3 1.0 0.6 vote for a specific candidate Cast blank votes / Elect nobody 7 2.1 1.3 Won’t vote 22 7.1 4.3 Not yet decide/Don’t know/Hard to say 25 8.0 4.8 Total 306 100.0 Missing 1

AppendixII-16

Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 17 If [choice in Q2] dropped out from elections, which one of them above would you vote for？(Interviewer can remind the respondents of names of remaining 8 candidates. Only one answer is allowed.)

Percentage of Percentage of respondents total sample Frequency （Base=233）（Base=507） Lee Wing Tat of DP 32 13.6 6.3 Lee Cheuk Yan of HKCTU 23 9.9 4.5 Albert Chan of pro-democracy camp 22 9.2 4.3 Albert Ho of DP 20 8.5 3.9 Leung Yiu Chung of NWS 19 8.1 3.7 Selina Chow of LP 15 6.5 3.0 Tam Yiu Chung of DAB 12 5.0 2.3 Tang Siu Tong of DAB 9 4.0 1.8 Cheung Yin Tung of DP 6 2.7 1.2 Any list from the pro-democracy camp 3 1.1 0.5 Cheung Hok Ming of HYK 2 1.0 0.5 Any list from the pro-China camp 0 0.2 0.1 Depend on the overall team-up and will not 5 2.2 1.0 vote for a specific candidate Cast blank votes / Elect nobody 7 3.1 1.4 Won’t vote 38 16.3 7.5 Not yet decide/Don’t know/Hard to say 20 8.6 3.9 Total 233 100.0 Missing 3

AppendixII-17

Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 18 If [Interviewer to read out the first five choices ascendingly] and some independent candidates took part in the election in your district, which parties or candidates you would never support? (Multiple answers are allowed, interviewers to probe if there are any other answers)

Percentage of responses （Base: 542 responses out Percentage of of 507 respondents Frequency respondents）（Base=467） DAB 143 26.4 30.7 DP 93 17.1 19.9 HYK 43 8.0 9.2 LP 31 5.6 6.6 HKCTU 17 3.1 3.6 NWS 10 1.8 2.1 No party affiliation / Independent 11 2.1 2.5 Support nobody 24 4.4 5.1 Not yet decide / Don’t know / Hard to say 142 26.2 30.5 Won’t answer hypothetical question / 29 5.3 6.2 Actual situation is different

Total 542 100.0 Missing 40

Table 19 [Only ask those who supported Democratic Party or pro-democracy camp in Q1-Q3] If Democratic Party and pro-democracy camp took part in the election in one list, would you vote for this list?

Percentage of Percentage of respondents total sample Frequency （Base=274）（Base=507） Yes 156 56.9 30.8 No 57 20.7 11.2

Not yet decide/Don’t know/Hard to say 62 22.5 12.2 Total 274 100.0 Missing 6

AppendixII-18

Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 20 Will you vote for a list, no matter you like or dislike the candidates on the list, for the purpose of supporting the camp which appeals to you?

Frequency Percentage Yes 79 33.9 No 141 60.2

Not yet decide/Don’t know/Hard to say 14 5.9 Total 235 100.0

Missing 0

Table 21 If the camp you support gave out some instructions to the electorates on the allocation of votes, such as casting your vote to another list belonging to the same camp according to your ID card number or birthday, would you follow?

Frequency Percentage Yes 37 15.9 No 172 73.3

Not yet decide/Don’t know/Hard to say 26 10.9 Total 235 100.0 Missing 0

Table 22 Are you a registered voter?

Frequency Percentage Yes (including those who have just registered) 408 80.6 No 98 19.4

Total 507 100.0 Missing 0

AppendixII-19

Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 23 【Only for registered voters】 When did you register as a voter？【Deduced from the year, input exact number】

Percentage of Percentage of respondents total sample Frequency （Base=406）（Base=507） This year, 2004, which means no more than 1 year 31 ) 7.7 ) 6.2 ) Last year, 2003, which means no more than 2 years 23 ) 5.6 ) 4.5 ) No more than 3 years 15 ) 3.6 ) 2.9 ) No more than 4 years 21 ) 90 5.1 ) 22.1 4.1 ) 17.7 4 years or above 115 28.2 22.6 Forgotten 202 49.7 39.9 Total 406 100.0 Missing 2

Table 24 【Only for registered voters】Did you vote in the District Council Election last November?

Percentage of Percentage of respondents total sample Frequency （Base=408）（Base=507） Yes 231 56.6 45.6 No: because the councillors were automatically elected 26 ) 6.3 ) 5.1 ) No: can vote but has not voted 110 ) 26.9 ) 21.6 ) No: not yet registered at that time 32 ) 168 7.8 ) 41.0 6.3 ) 33.0

Forgotten 10 2.4 1.9 Total 408 100.0 Missing 0

AppendixII-20

Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 25 【Only for registered voters】Have you ever voted in the past Council elections in different tiers?

Percentage of Percentage of respondents total sample Frequency （Base= 408）（Base=507） Yes 331 81.2 65.4 No: not yet registered at that time 39 ) 9.6 ) 7.7 ) No: can vote but has not voted 31 ) 70 7.5 ) 17.1 6.0 ) 13.7

Forgotten 7 1.8 1.4 Total 408 100.0 Missing 0

Table 26 【Only for registered voters】 Will you vote in the coming Legislative Council Election in September？

Percentage of Percentage of respondents total sample Frequency （Base=408）（Base=507） Definitely yes 222 ) 54.4 ) 43.8 ) Most likely yes 95 ) 317 23.3 ) 77.6 18.7 ) 62.5

Most likely no 10 ) 2.5 ) 2.1 ) Definitely no 15 ) 26 3.7 ) 6.2 3.0 ) 5.0 Not yet decide/Don’t know/Hard 66 16.1 13.0 to say Total 408 100.0 Missing 0

Table 27 Did you participate in the July 1 rally last year？

Frequency Percentage Yes 74 14.6 No 432 85.4

Total 506 100.0 Missing 1

AppendixII-21

Public Opinion Programme, the University of Hong Kong 2004 LegCo Direct Election: Survery on Individual Constituency【NT West】 Frequency Table

Table 28 Did you participate in the January 1 rally？

Frequency Percentage Yes 19 3.9 No 485 96.1

Total 505 100.0 Missing 2

Table 29 Did you participate in the July 1 rally this year？

Frequency Percentage Yes 46 9.2 No 458 90.8

Total 504 100.0 Missing 3

AppendixII-22