DOCSLIB.ORG

Legisbrief a QUICK LOOK Rnto TMPORTANT TSSUES of the DAY NCSL JUN Zott I Vol.25, No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Legisbrief a QUICK LOOK Rnto TMPORTANT TSSUES of the DAY NCSL JUN Zott I Vol.25, No I NaTToNAL CoNFERENCE of SrRre LEctsLATURES llillt/l\ LegisBrief A QUICK LOOK rNTO TMPORTANT TSSUES OF THE DAY NCSL JUN zott I vol.25, No. 23 timiting BiU Introductions BY BRENDA ERICKSON For example, Colorado changed its introduction limit in 1984 and again Lawmakers' desire to pass or improve in 1988. A legislative body also may state laws, combined with limited time decide that bill introduction limits in session, result in a too-many-bills- do not work for it. For example, the and-not-enough-time challenge in Hawaii Senate, Michigan Senate and many statehouses across the country House, New fersey Senate and Gen- each year, So what do state legislatures eral Assembly, and Washington House do? They experiment with ways to tried using them, but subsequently curb the amount of legislation entering eliminated the practice. into the process. Some chambers use Exceptions or "safety valves" may be a direct approach. They limit the num- created for required legislation or ber of bills that an individual legislator emergency situations. For example: may request or introduce. Supporters believe introduction limits . LeBlslative leaders may be able help reduce the number of bills enter- to introduce more bills than ing the legislative process and allow other legislators. more time to process substantive . Limits may not apply to certain legislation. Others disagree and say bills or resolutions, such as these limits restrict members' rights appropriation bills or local bills. to propose bills and carry out their legislative resp onsibilities. The rule establishing the limit may be suspended. State Action . A limit may be exceeded with At least 24 of the nation's 99 approval by a special committee, chambers impose some sort of bill such as a Delayed Bills introduction limit. Such limits are not Committee. new however. In several chambers, they've been in place for decades. For Bill introduction limits also may serve example, North Dakota's limits may another purpose. Some are designed have been imposed as early as the to encourage early bill preparation- 1940s. The 1970s brought limits to that is, members are allowed to pre- both legislative chambers in Colo- file an unlimited number of bills, but a rado and Indiana. The Florida House, limit kicks in after session convenes. Nevada Senate, Nevada Assembly Chamber rules set the maiority of and Tennessee Senate imposed limits bill introduction limits. In Louisiana, during the 1980s. Limits started for the state constitution establishes the the Arizona House, California Senate, restriction. The Virginia Senate and California Assembly, Louisiana Senate, House establish their limits by joint Louisiana House and Wyoming Senate resolution. Examples of current bill in the 1990s. request or introduction limits in the Bill introduction limits are not always chart on the following page provide a static. They may be revised as the snapshot of the what these limits look legislatures or circumstances change. like and how they're established. Bill Request or lntroduction Limits Chamber Authority Current Request or lntroduction Limit After the fourth day of session, only seven more Arizona House House Rule 8(C) bills Not more than 40 bills in the (two-year) regular California Senate Senate Rule 22.5 session Not more than 50 bills in the (two-year) regular California Assembly Assembly Rule 49 session Colorado Senate Joint Rule 24(b) Not more than five bills in a regular session and House Florida House House Rule 5.3 Not more than six bills for a regular session First regular session-no limit lndiana Senate Senate Rule 48 Second regular session-not more than 1 0 bills or joint resolutions First regular session-not more than 10 bills lndiana House House Rule 108 Second regular session-not more than five bills Louisiana Senate Constitution Article 3, Not more than five bills that were not prefiled and House Sec. 2(A) Before 5 p.m. on Dec. 5, unlimited. Montana Senate Joint Rule 40-40 request no more than and House After that, a member may seven bills or resolutions. After a regular legislative session has convened Nevada Senate and if submitted before 5 p.m. on the 15th NGSI Gontoct Joint Rule 14 and Assembly calendar day, not more than 60 requests, in total, Brendo Ericlson from each chamber. 303-856-1!X)1 North Carolina House House Rule 31 .1 Not more than 1 5 public bills After the eighth legislative day, only three more North Dakota Senate Senate Rule 4Az bills North Dakota House House Rule 402 After the third legislative day, only five more bills House custom Request limit-1 5 bills Oklahoma House As principal autho[ only eight bills during a session After Thursday of the second week of each Tennessee Senate Senate Rule 25 annual session, not more than nine general bill introductions Tennessee House House Rule 44 Not more than 15 bills during each annual session Not more than a combined total of eight bills and Virginia Senate 2016 HJR 37 joint resolutions Resolution-not more than a combined total of 2016 HJR 37 five bills and joint resolutions Virginia House Rule-not more than 1 5 bills during the regular House Rule 37 session of an odd-numbered year Senate Rule 4-3 Not more than seven bills in any session Wyoming Senate Senate Rule 13-3 Not more than three bills in any budget session Wyoming House House Rule 13-1 Not more than five bills in any budget session National ConfetEnce of State lrgblaturcs I Wlliam T. Poun4 E (edrtire Dlr€ctor 7700 East First Place, Denver, Colorado 80230, ,03-35/,-770o I ,144 Nofth Capkol Street, N.W, Suite 515, Washington, D.C.20001,202-624-5400 www.ncsl.org I The information contained in this LegisBrief does not necessarily reflect NCSL policy..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 Nevada Legislative Manual: Chapter I—Members of the Nevada Legislature
    LEGISLATIVE MANUAL CHAPTER I MEMBERS OF THE NEVADA LEGISLATURE LEGISLATIVE MANUAL BIOGRAPHIES OF MEMBERS OF THE NEVADA SENATE LEGISLATIVE BIOGRAPHY — 2019 SESSION LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR AND PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE KATE MARSHALL Democrat Born: 1959 – San Francisco, California Educated: University of California, Berkeley, B.A., Political Science/English; University of California, Berkeley, School of Law, J.D. Married: Elliott Parker Children: Anna, Molly Hobbies/Special Interests: Hiking, family sporting events LEGISLATIVE SERVICE Served in 1 Regular Session Years in Senate: First elected Lieutenant Governor, November 2018 President of the Senate, 2019 to Current Page 5 LEGISLATIVE BIOGRAPHY — 2019 SESSION KELVIN D. ATKINSON Democrat Senate District 4 Clark County (part) Small Business Owner Born: 1969 – Chicago, Illinois Educated: Culver City High School; Howard University, Washington, D.C.; University of Nevada, Las Vegas Children: Haley Hobbies/Special Interests: Reading, watching the Raiders and Lakers, studying politics, traveling LEGISLATIVE SERVICE Served in 9 Regular Sessions and 12 Special Sessions Years in Assembly: November 2002 to November 2012 Years in Senate: November 2012 to Current Leadership: Assembly Senior Chief Deputy Whip, 2011 Senate Co-Minority Whip, 2015 and 2015 Special Session Senate Assistant Minority Floor Leader, 2016 Special Session Senate Assistant Majority Floor Leader, 2017 Senate Majority Leader, 2019 Legislative Commission: 2013; 2015; 2017 Interim Finance Committee: 2011 Assembly Committees: Commerce and
    [Show full text]
  • Newly Elected Representatives in the 114Th Congress
    Newly Elected Representatives in the 114th Congress Contents Representative Gary Palmer (Alabama-6) ....................................................................................................... 3 Representative Ruben Gallego (Arizona-7) ...................................................................................................... 4 Representative J. French Hill (Arkansas-2) ...................................................................................................... 5 Representative Bruce Westerman (Arkansas-4) .............................................................................................. 6 Representative Mark DeSaulnier (California-11) ............................................................................................. 7 Representative Steve Knight (California-25) .................................................................................................... 8 Representative Peter Aguilar (California-31) ................................................................................................... 9 Representative Ted Lieu (California-33) ........................................................................................................ 10 Representative Norma Torres (California-35) ................................................................................................ 11 Representative Mimi Walters (California-45) ................................................................................................ 12 Representative Ken Buck (Colorado-4) .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Member Pictorial Directory
    NEW MEMBER PICTORIAL DIRECTORY PREPARED BY THE COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION Candice S. Miller, Chairman | Robert A. Brady, Ranking Minority Member NEW MEMBER PICTORIAL DIRECTORY As of November 7, 2014, the Clerk of the House had not received certificates of election for any of the individuals listed in this directory. At the time this publication was sent to press, the following races had not been finally determined: Arizona 2nd California 7th California 9th California 16th California 17th California 26th California 52nd Louisiana 5th Louisiana 6th New York 25th Washington 4th Profiles of candidates from these districts begin on page 33. PREpaRED BY THE COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION Candice S. Miller, Chairman | Robert A. Brady, Ranking Minority Member TABLE OF CONTENTS Adams, Alma .........................23 Katko, John...........................21 Abraham, Ralph .......................36 Khanna, Ro...........................35 Aguilar, Pete ...........................4 Knight, Steve ..........................4 Allen, Rick ............................9 Lawrence, Brenda......................15 Amador, Tony.........................34 Lieu, Ted..............................5 Ashford, Brad .........................17 Loudermilk, Barry ......................9 Assini, Mark ..........................38 Love, Mia ............................26 Babin, Brian ..........................26 MacArthur, Tom.......................19 Beyer, Don ........................... 27 Mayo, Jamie ..........................37 Bishop, Mike .........................14
    [Show full text]
  • State Legislative Update
    Journal of Dispute Resolution Volume 2004 Issue 2 Article 4 2004 State Legislative Update Robert J. Fisher Katherine M. Massa Benjamin B. Nelson Cassandra A. Rogers Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr Part of the Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons Recommended Citation Robert J. Fisher, Katherine M. Massa, Benjamin B. Nelson, and Cassandra A. Rogers, State Legislative Update, 2004 J. Disp. Resol. (2004) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2004/iss2/4 This Legislation is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Dispute Resolution by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fisher et al.: Fisher: State Legislative Update State Legislative Update* Robert J. Fischer Katherine M. Massa Benjamin B. Nelson CassandraA. Rogers I. STATE LEGISLATIVE Focus A. Confidentiality in Mediation: FloridaSenate Bill 1970' Bill Number: Florida Senate Bill 1970 Summary: This bill creates the Mediation Confidentiality and Privilege Act. It provides for standardized proceedings, so that both court-ordered and non court-ordered mediation are entitled to the same confidentiality status. Status: Signed by Governor, June 10, 2004 1. Introduction Confidentiality in mediation communications is an issue of vital importance to all those involved. The assurance of confidentiality in mediation proceedings promotes openness and candor between the parties. Often, it is openness that will lead parties to a resolution of a dispute. With the passage of Senate Bill 1970 the Florida legislature has recognized the importance that confidentiality protections play in the encouragement of successful mediations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Following Candidates, State and Local Ballot Measures, Political
    2011 Corporate Political Contributions The following candidates, state and local ballot measures, political parties and other committees received corporate campaign contributions from Sempra Energy in 2011: Candidate/ Committee/ Organization Party Office Sought Total Abed, Sam N/A Mayor, City of Escondido $530.00 Achadjian, Katcho REP California State Assembly $3,000.00 Adams, Steve N/A City Council, City of Riverside $500.00 Aguinaga, Louie N/A Mayor, City of South El Monte $300.00 Alejo, Luis DEM California State Assembly $1,000.00 Allen, Michael DEM California State Assembly $1,000.00 Anderson, Joel REP California State Senate $1,500.00 Arakawa, Alan N/A Mayor, County of Maui $1,000.00 Atkins, Toni DEM California State Assembly $3,000.00 Azevedo, Kathy N/A Mayor Pro Tem, City of Norco $300.00 Bates, Pat N/A County Supervisor, County of Orange $500.00 Berryhill, Bill REP California State Senate $2,000.00 Berryhill, Tom REP California State Senate $3,000.00 Block, Marty DEM California State Assembly $3,900.00 Block, Marty DEM California State Senate $1,000.00 Blumenfield, Bob DEM California State Assembly $2,000.00 Bocanegra, Raul DEM California State Assembly $1,950.00 Bonilla, Susan DEM California State Assembly $2,600.00 Botts, Bob N/A City Council, City of Banning $99.00 Bradford, Steven DEM California State Assembly $7,800.00 Brandman, Jordan N/A City Council, City of Anaheim $250.00 Bric, Gary N/A City Council, City of Burbank $250.00 Broome, Sharon DEM Louisiana State Senate $500.00 Buchanan, Joan DEM California State Assembly
    [Show full text]
  • Prayer Practices
    Floor Action 5-145 Prayer Practices Legislatures operate with a certain element of pomp, ceremony and procedure that flavor the institution with a unique air of tradition and theatre. The mystique of the opening ceremonies and rituals help to bring order and dignity to the proceedings. One of these opening ceremonies is the offering of a prayer. Use of legislative prayer. The practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer is long- standing. The custom draws its roots from both houses of the British Parliament, which, according to noted parliamentarian Luther Cushing, from time ”immemorial” began each day with a “reading of the prayers.” In the United States, this custom has continued without interruption at the federal level since the first Congress under the Constitution (1789) and for more than a century in many states. Almost all state legislatures still use an opening prayer as part of their tradition and procedure (see table 02-5.50). In the Massachusetts Senate, a prayer is offered at the beginning of floor sessions for special occasions. Although the use of an opening prayer is standard practice, the timing of when the prayer occurs varies (see table 02-5.51). In the majority of legislative bodies, the prayer is offered after the floor session is called to order, but before the opening roll call is taken. Prayers sometimes are given before floor sessions are officially called to order; this is true in the Colorado House, Nebraska Senate and Ohio House. Many chambers vary on who delivers the prayer. Forty-seven chambers allow people other than the designated legislative chaplain or a visiting chaplain to offer the opening prayer (see table 02-5.52).
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Appropriations Committee Meeting March 17Th 2021 Brent and Trish Levinson - Affinity Global Solutions Page 1 of 2
    Testimony of Brent and Trish Levinson for the North Dakota Senate Appropriations Public Hearing on March 17th 2021. Chairman Holmberg and committee members of the Senate Appropriations Committee, This testimony is presented by Brent and Trish Levinson the owners of Affinity Global Solutions (AGS) whose IBARS (Internet Budget Analysis and Reporting System) product is used to source, analyze, and generate publications for the State's budget. In the upcoming biennium IBARS is to be replaced through a project sponsored by OMB and the Governor's Office. OMB has requested an "annual contract for a new budget system" with a request amount of $1,230,100 (see Exhibits A and B) with additional funding to be sourced through the Strategic Investment and Improvement Fund. It is unclear what the intent and scope of this contract is. Perhaps, this is a long term software as a service (SaaS) contract for $1,230,100 per year where the State owns no solution? AGS has been a partner with the State of North Dakota in sourcing, analyzing and producing reports and publications for the State's budget for over 25 years. The origins of IBARS were built to meet the needs of North Dakota's State budgeting process and then enhanced to meet the needs of many other States. For example, IBARS went live in December 2019 for the State of New Jersey. IBARS is an actively supported, developed, vibrant and competitive product built by and for North Dakotans. 2020 maintenance of IBARS for the State of North Dakota was $93,635. North Dakota has a perpetual license for IBARS.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the Tennessee General Assembly 1794 – Present
    TENNESSEE SENATORS HISTORICAL LISTING ANDERSON COUNTY – WILSON COUNTY COMPILED BY DIANE BLACK LIBRARIAN TENNESSEE STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES 403 7TH AVENUE NORTH NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37243-0312 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Tennessee General Assembly − Senate Introduction – Individual Counties ii Historical Listings – Anderson County – Wilson County 1 – 255 State Senators Political Parties 1887 – 2010 256 Sources 256 i Tennessee General Assembly − Senate Introduction – Individual Counties Beginning with Anderson County and ending with Wilson County, Tennessee, I have listed the state senator who represented that county. Despite extensive research the following counties General Assembly Senators could not be found (Benton – 23rd; Carter – 10th; Cumberland – 37th; Dickson – 17th; Jackson – 10th; Lake – 40th; Obion – 40th; Overton – 10th; Union – 37th; and Van Buren – 29th). Each county listing has the state senator who represented that county, General Assembly, years of service and beginning with the Forty-Fifth General Assembly (1887), the political party if known is listed. If a State Senator died in office or resigned I have tried to note this date and the date his or her replacement was elected or appointed to office. The web link to the Acts of Tennessee as to formation of a county is given along with the common abbreviation used for that county, except for Tennessee County which does not have an abbreviation. ii MEMBERS OF THE TENNESSEE GENERAL ASSEMBLY 1794 – PRESENT SENATE ANDERSON COUNTY – 1801 - A County Formation in Acts of Tennessee - Anderson County passed on November 6, 1801 http://state.tn.us/tsla/history/county/actanderson.htm NAME POLITICAL GENERAL YEARS PARTY ASSEMBLY White, James 5th 1803 – 1805 (General) Houston, Robert 6th 1805 – 1807 Preston, George 7th (1st Session − September 24 – died in office before December 4, 1807 1808) Brown, William 7th – 8th (2nd April 3, 1809 – session) September 15, 1811 Rogers, James R.
    [Show full text]
  • State Trends: Legislative Victories From
    State Trends ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA MAINE MISSISSIPPI NEVADA NEW YORK OREGON PENNSYLVANIA TEXAS UTAH VIRGINIA WaSHINGTON ARIZONA COLORADO CONNECTICUT DELAWARE GEORGIA ILLINOIS INDIANA Legislative Victories from 2005 to 2010 Removing Youth from the Adult Criminal Justice System The Campaign for Youth Justice (CFYJ) is a national organization dedicated to ending the practice of prosecuting, sentencing, and incarcerating youth under the age of 18 in the adult criminal justice system. CFYJ dedicates this report to the thousands of young people and their families across the country who have been harmed by laws and policies of the criminal justice system; the Governors, State Legislators, State Officials, and Local Officials who championed these reforms; and the continuing efforts
    [Show full text]
  • A Student's Guide to the Tennessee
    The MembersA of theStudent’s Senate Guide to the Tennessee Senate 2013 Edition Welcome to the Tennessee Senate. Thank you for your interest in your government. My name is Ron Ramsey. I am the Lieutenant Governor of Tennessee. I have this job because a majority of my fellow senators voted for me to be their leader, or “Speaker.” Unlike many other states, Tennessee’s Lieutenant Governor is also head of its Senate. My duties as both Speaker of the Senate and Lieutenant Governor keep me very busy. However, because I am a state Senator, my job is officially part-time. Having a part-time legislature is good because it allows elected officials to spend time living and working under the laws they make and with the people they represent. When the legislature is not in session I run a real estate and auction business with my wife, Sindy, in my hometown of Blountville, which is right on the border between Virginia and Tennessee. It is a wonderful town and I am glad to be able to spend time there when the legislature is not in session. If you visit the Capitol on a day when the legislature is in session, you will see me presiding over the Senate. I have a gavel, and I do my best to keep Senate sessions moving along quickly and efficiently so my members can get back home to their families and businesses. I also make all of the Senate’s committee assignments. Much of the Senate’s work goes on in committees so it is important to have the right people working on the right issues.
    [Show full text]
  • February 23, 2021 the Honorable Karl Rhoads Chair, Hawaii Senate Judiciary Committee Hawaii State Capitol 415 S
    February 23, 2021 The Honorable Karl Rhoads Chair, Hawaii Senate Judiciary Committee Hawaii State Capitol 415 S. Beretania St., Room 204 Honolulu, HI 96813 The Honorable Jarrett Keohokalole Vice Chair, Hawaii Senate Judiciary Committee Hawaii State Capitol 415 S. Beretania St., Room 231 Honolulu, HI 96813 The Honorable Rosalyn H. Baker Chair, Hawaii Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection Hawaii State Capitol 415 S. Beretania St., Room 230 Honolulu, HI 96813 The Honorable Stanley Chang Vice-Chair, Hawaii Senate Committee on Commerce and Consumer Protection Hawaii State Capitol 415 S. Beretania St., Room 226 Honolulu, HI 96813 RE: ATA SUPPORT FOR SENATE BILL 970 On behalf of the American Telemedicine Association (ATA) and the over 400 organizations we represent, I am writing to express our support for Senate Bill 970, which clarifies that a patient-practitioner relationship may be established during a telehealth appointment. The ATA is the only national organization completely focused on advancing telehealth. We are committed to ensuring that everyone has access to safe, affordable, and high-quality care whenever and wherever they need it. This empowers the health care system to provide services to millions more patients every year in an efficacious manner. The ATA represents a broad and inclusive coalition of technology solution providers and payers, as well as partner organizations and alliances, working to advance industry adoption of telehealth, promote responsible policy, advocate for government and market normalization, and provide education and resources to help integrate virtual care into emerging, value-based modalities. Senate Bill 970 serves as an important and rational expansion of Hawaii’s state telehealth policy.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. House Report 32 for H.R. 4221 (Feb 1959)
    86TH CONoRESS L HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORT 1st Session No. 32 HAWAII STATEHOOD FEBRUARY 11, 1959.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. AsPINALL, from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 4221] The Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 4221) to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii into the Union, having considered the same, report favorably thereon without amendment and recommend that the bill do pass. The purpose of H.R. 4221, introduced by Representative O'Brien of New York, is to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii into the Union. This bill and its two companions-H.R. 4183 by Delegate Burns and H.R. 4228 by Representative Saylor-were introduced following the committee's consideration of 20 earlier 86th Congress bills and include all amendments adopted in connection therewith. These 20 bills are as follows: H.R. 50, introduced by Delegate Burns; H.R. 324, introduced by Representative Barrett; H.R. 801, introduced by Representative Holland; H.R. 888, introduced by Representative O'Brien of New York; H.R. 954, introduced by Representative Saylor; H.R. 959, introduced by Representative Sisk; H.R. 1106, introduced by Representative Berry; H.R. 1800, introduced by Repre- sentative Dent; H.R. 1833, introduced by Representative Libonati; H.R. 1917, introduced by Representative Green of Oregon; H.R. 1918, introduced by Representative Holt; H.R. 2004, introduced by Representative Younger; .H.R.
    [Show full text]