Intracellular Protein Degradation Mark Hochstrasser Yale University, New Haven, CT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Intracellular Protein Degradation Mark Hochstrasser Yale University, New Haven, CT 40632_CH03_hochstrasser.qxd 3/26/07 11:45 AM Page 1 3 Intracellular protein degradation Mark Hochstrasser Yale University, New Haven, CT CHAPTER OUTLINE 3.1 Introduction 3.8 Integral membrane proteins that function at the cell 3.2 Overview of the ubiquitin-proteasome system surface are degraded within lysosomes 3.3 Ubiquitin attachment to substrates requires multiple 3.9 Under stressful conditions cytoplasmic proteins can be enzymes engulfed into autophagosomes and degraded in the lysosome 3.4 Substrate recognition in the ubiquitin-ligation system 3.10 What’s next? 3.5 Degradation of proteins by the proteasome 3.11 Summary 3.6 Membrane proteins are degraded by several mechanisms 3.12 Supplement 1: Failures of the ubiquitin-proteasome 3.7 Retrotranslocation from the endoplasmic reticulum back system are a cause of human diseases into the cytoplasm allows degradation of short-lived ER proteins 3.13 Supplement 2: Ubiquitin has many functions beyond the proteasome 1 40632_CH03_hochstrasser.qxd 3/23/07 4:52 PM Page 2 3.1 rapidly even without any change in the rate at Introduction which it is synthesized. For example, progres- Key concepts sion of the cell through the cell cycle requires • Different proteins in a cell have vastly different that certain inhibitors of mitosis be inactivated rates of degradation. The cell can regulate those once the chromosomes are aligned and are ready rates. to be separated to opposite poles. At that point • Regulatory proteins such as transcription factors the sensitivity of the inhibitors to proteolysis and cell cycle regulators often have high rates of suddenly increases and they quickly disappear, degradation to allow rapid changes in their con- centration. allowing the cell cycle to advance. • Misfolded or damaged proteins, which are poten- This example illustrates one of the advan- tially toxic, are also targets for efficient elimina- tages of protein degradation as a form of con- tion. trol: its irreversibility. Elimination of a protein • Most intracellular protein degradation is energy- removes any chance of its being reactivated in- dependent, highly specific, and processive. appropriately, which in the case of the cell cy- cle could be lethal to the cell. It is probably for Cells are densely packed with many different this reason that selective protein degradation kinds of proteins, and these proteins are in a is a common component of regulatory mecha- highly dynamic state, moving from place to nisms that determine the relative timing of place within the cell and associating and disso- events. For example, in the cell cycle, mitosis ciating with other proteins and ligands. In view must follow duplication of the chromosomes, of the energy that a cell expends synthesizing so certain factors required for DNA synthesis and organizing its proteins, it may be surpris- are degraded at the end of S phase and are only ing to learn that it is also constantly degrading synthesized again once mitosis has been com- many of them while they are still perfectly func- pleted. tional. Each has its own characteristic rate of In addition to degrading regulatory pro- degradation, or half-life. Most are normally teins, cells also degrade other types of proteins degraded slowly, with half-lives of many hours, while they are still functional. The purpose is days, or longer. Others, in contrast, have half- usually to remove proteins that the cell no longer lives that are much shorter than the doubling needs. This is often the case with proteins that time of the cell, in some cases being as short as help a cell adapt to a particular set of conditions; a few minutes. once the conditions cease to exist the proteins What purpose does proteolysis within a are degraded. Human muscles, for example, are cell serve, and why are the half-lives of some remodeled depending on how they are used proteins so short? One answer to both these and what energy source is available. Remodeling questions is that proteolysis is a very effective involves proteolysis of one set of structural and form of regulation. The rate at which a protein metabolic proteins and its replacement by an- is degraded has a profound effect on how quickly other specialized for a different purpose. its concentration can be changed following a Another function of intracellular proteol- change in its rate of synthesis. A protein that is ysis is to rid the cell of damaged or potentially degraded slowly will persist in the cell even if harmful proteins. Proteins can misfold or de- the cell stops making it. A rapidly degraded pro- nature, they may fail to assemble properly into tein, however, will quickly disappear after its complexes, or they can be altered by some ab- synthesis is stopped. Thus, rapid proteolysis of normal posttranslational modification. Such a protein allows rapid readjustment of its level aberrant proteins are potentially toxic and need within the cell. For this reason, proteins that to be eliminated. The eukaryotic cell has a re- may need to be activated or inactivated quickly markable ability to distinguish normal from ab- often have high rates of degradation, resulting normal proteins and selectively degrade the in short half-lives. This is true of many cellular latter. When this capacity is compromised, dis- regulatory proteins, such as transcription factors, ease often results. enzymes controlling rate-limiting steps in Several important properties characterize biosynthetic pathways, and cell cycle regula- the degradation of most intracellular proteins. tors. Perhaps most obvious is that it must be exquis- Regulation can also be achieved by abruptly itely specific. Only certain proteins should be changing the rate at which a protein is degraded. proteolyzed rapidly, and those often only under If a protein’s rate of degradation is suddenly in- very specific conditions. It is easy to imagine creased its concentration within the cell will fall the devastation that would result if a protease 2 CHAPTER 3 Intracellular protein degradation 40632_CH03_hochstrasser.qxd 3/23/07 4:52 PM Page 3 that lacked such specificity were let loose within the trafficking of proteins into the lysosome. In a living cell. Proteases of the digestive system, this regard, the central question of how only for example, need to be able to cleave proteins particular proteins are degraded in the lyso- with high efficiency but low specificity, and it some is closely linked to the question of how spe- would be catastrophic if such a protease were cific proteins sort between different cellular released in the cytoplasm. A second feature of compartments. intracellular proteolysis is its dependence on the input of energy. Despite the fact that pep- tide bond cleavage is energetically favorable, 3.2 Overview of the ATP hydrolysis is necessary for efficient degra- dation of most proteins within the cell. This en- ubiquitin-proteasome ergy requirement derives largely from the need system for very high substrate specificity and can be understood in light of what we now know about Key concepts the molecular mechanisms of most cellular pro- • Cellular proteins to be degraded are first cova- teolytic pathways. These mechanisms will be lently linked to a polymer of ubiquitin polypep- the main topic of this chapter. tides; this polyubiquitin chain allows the substrate A final property that distinguishes most in- to bind to the proteasome, where the substrate protein is processively degraded to small peptides. tracellular proteolysis is that it is processive: • The ubiquitin-proteasome system performs most once a protein is selected for proteolysis, it is intracellular proteolysis. completely degraded to small peptides without larger intermediate forms being released. Processive degradation prevents the release Proteolysis of specific proteins in a cell is usu- of large protein fragments that might interfere ally performed by the ubiquitin-proteasome with cell function. For example, many tran- system. The enzymes comprising this system scription factors have their DNA-binding and can, when necessary, select and degrade almost transcriptional activation activities in separate any protein in the cell. Such proteolysis serves protein domains. If the DNA-binding domain a number of purposes. It orchestrates various cel- were proteolytically separated from the activat- lular events—such as critical cell cycle transi- ing domain, it would still be able to bind DNA tions—by eliminating regulatory proteins; it and might compete with the normal factor for removes proteins that the cell no longer needs; regulatory sites in the genome. and it provides an important quality control This chapter will focus on the major mech- function by continuously scanning the cell’s anisms of protein degradation in the eukary- collection of proteins and ridding it of those that otic cell. The majority of regulated degradation are damaged or abnormal. In all cases these en- occurs through the ubiquitin-proteasome sys- zymes act with great specificity, not only iden- tem, which functions in both the cytoplasm and tifying individual proteins from among the the nucleus. In order for a protein to be de- thousands in a cell, but often distinguishing dif- graded by this mechanism, it is first covalently ferent forms of the same protein depending on modified by the attachment of multiple copies factors such as subcellular localization, post- of a small polypeptide called ubiquitin. The translational modification, or inclusion in par- polyubiquitin-modified protein is recognized ticular multiprotein complexes. by an abundant, multisubunit protease called the The system is organized around ubiquitin, proteasome, which degrades the substrate into a small protein that is used as a label to desig- short peptides. The next section introduces the nate proteins for destruction. Ubiquitin is added ubiquitin-proteasome system in greater detail. to proteins in a tightly linked series of reactions Some proteolysis of cellular proteins also (FIGURE 3.1). A protein to be degraded is first rec- occurs in the lysosome, a membrane-enclosed ognized by a specific ubiquitin-protein lig- organelle.
Recommended publications
  • Membrane Protein Stabilization Strategies for Structural and Functional Studies
    membranes Review Membrane Protein Stabilization Strategies for Structural and Functional Studies Ekaitz Errasti-Murugarren 1,2,*, Paola Bartoccioni 1,2 and Manuel Palacín 1,2,3,* 1 Laboratory of Amino acid Transporters and Disease, Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Baldiri Reixac 10, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; [email protected] 2 CIBERER (Centro Español en Red de Biomedicina de Enfermedades Raras), 28029 Barcelona, Spain 3 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biomedicine, Universitat de Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (E.E.-M.); [email protected] (M.P.) Abstract: Accounting for nearly two-thirds of known druggable targets, membrane proteins are highly relevant for cell physiology and pharmacology. In this regard, the structural determination of pharmacologically relevant targets would facilitate the intelligent design of new drugs. The structural biology of membrane proteins is a field experiencing significant growth as a result of the development of new strategies for structure determination. However, membrane protein preparation for structural studies continues to be a limiting step in many cases due to the inherent instability of these molecules in non-native membrane environments. This review describes the approaches that have been developed to improve membrane protein stability. Membrane protein mutagenesis, detergent selection, lipid membrane mimics, antibodies, and ligands are described in this review as approaches to facilitate the production of purified and stable membrane proteins of interest for structural and functional studies. Keywords: membrane proteins; stability; mutagenesis; detergent; lipid; antibody; nanobody; ligand Citation: Errasti-Murugarren, E.; Bartoccioni, P.; Palacín, M. Membrane Protein Stabilization Strategies for Structural and Functional Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Snapshot: ER-Associated Protein Degradation Pathways Shinichi Kawaguchi and Davis T.W
    SnapShot: ER-Associated Protein Degradation Pathways Shinichi Kawaguchi and Davis T.W. Ng Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory and Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604 1230 Cell 129, June 15, 2007 ©2007 Elsevier Inc. DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.005 See online version for legend and references. SnapShot: ER-Associated Protein Degradation Pathways Shinichi Kawaguchi and Davis T.W. Ng Temasek Life Sciences Laboratory and Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117604 Arrows specify the routes of individual pathways. All pathways culminate in substrate degradation by the 26S proteasome. (Left) ERAD Pathways in Budding Yeast (A) Newly synthesized secretory and membrane proteins enter the ER through the Sec61 protein-conducting channel complex unfolded. Hsp70-related molecular chaperones (Kar2p) bind to nascent polypeptides in the ER lumen and to the cytosolic domains of membrane proteins (Hsp70, B). These factors assist in substrate folding and also assist in their disposal if they fail to fold. Mannose residues on misfolded glycoproteins are trimmed by the ER mannosidase Mns1p (E). Mannose trimming facilitates the recognition of misfolded glycoproteins by luminally oriented lectin factors Htm1p and Yos9p. (C, D, and F) At least two ER membrane-localized E3 ubiquitin ligases organize protein complexes that receive and process misfolded proteins. These complexes define three pathways that recognize lesions in the cytosolic (ERAD-C), transmembrane (ERAD-M), and luminal (ERAD-L) domains of substrates. Both ERAD-M and ERAD-L use the Hrd1 ubiquitin ligase but the luminal factor Yos9p is dispensable for ERAD-M. A Hrd1 complex lacking Yos9p has been observed suggesting dedicated complexes for all three pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathways in Proteostasis Maintenance
    biomolecules Review Nuclear Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathways in Proteostasis Maintenance Dina Frani´c †, Klara Zubˇci´c † and Mirta Boban * Croatian Institute for Brain Research, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] (D.F.); [email protected] (K.Z.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equal contribution. Abstract: Protein homeostasis, or proteostasis, is crucial for the functioning of a cell, as proteins that are mislocalized, present in excessive amounts, or aberrant due to misfolding or other type of damage can be harmful. Proteostasis includes attaining the correct protein structure, localization, and the for- mation of higher order complexes, and well as the appropriate protein concentrations. Consequences of proteostasis imbalance are evident in a range of neurodegenerative diseases characterized by protein misfolding and aggregation, such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. To protect the cell from the accumulation of aberrant proteins, a network of protein quality control (PQC) pathways identifies the substrates and direct them towards refolding or elimination via regulated protein degradation. The main pathway for degradation of misfolded proteins is the ubiquitin-proteasome system. PQC pathways have been first described in the cytoplasm and the endoplasmic reticulum, however, accumulating evidence indicates that the nucleus is an important PQC compartment for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of not only nuclear, but also cyto- plasmic proteins. In this review, we summarize the nuclear ubiquitin-proteasome pathways involved in proteostasis maintenance in yeast, focusing on inner nuclear membrane-associated degradation (INMAD) and San1-mediated protein quality control. Keywords: proteasome; ubiquitin; nucleus; inner nuclear membrane; yeast; proteostasis; protein quality control; protein misfolding Citation: Frani´c,D.; Zubˇci´c,K.; Boban, M.
    [Show full text]
  • How Does Protein Zero Assemble Compact Myelin?
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 13 May 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202005.0222.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Cells 2020, 9, 1832; doi:10.3390/cells9081832 Perspective How Does Protein Zero Assemble Compact Myelin? Arne Raasakka 1,* and Petri Kursula 1,2 1 Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, NO-5009 Bergen, Norway 2 Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine & Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Aapistie 7A, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Myelin protein zero (P0), a type I transmembrane protein, is the most abundant protein in peripheral nervous system (PNS) myelin – the lipid-rich, periodic structure that concentrically encloses long axonal segments. Schwann cells, the myelinating glia of the PNS, express P0 throughout their development until the formation of mature myelin. In the intramyelinic compartment, the immunoglobulin-like domain of P0 bridges apposing membranes together via homophilic adhesion, forming a dense, macroscopic ultrastructure known as the intraperiod line. The C-terminal tail of P0 adheres apposing membranes together in the narrow cytoplasmic compartment of compact myelin, much like myelin basic protein (MBP). In mouse models, the absence of P0, unlike that of MBP or P2, severely disturbs the formation of myelin. Therefore, P0 is the executive molecule of PNS myelin maturation. How and when is P0 trafficked and modified to enable myelin compaction, and how disease mutations that give rise to incurable peripheral neuropathies alter the function of P0, are currently open questions. The potential mechanisms of P0 function in myelination are discussed, providing a foundation for the understanding of mature myelin development and how it derails in peripheral neuropathies.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane Proteins Are Associated with the Membrane of a Cell Or Particular Organelle and Are Generally More Problematic to Purify Than Water-Soluble Proteins
    Strategies for the Purification of Membrane Proteins Sinéad Marian Smith Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland. Email: [email protected] Abstract Although membrane proteins account for approximately 30 % of the coding regions of all sequenced genomes and play crucial roles in many fundamental cell processes, there are relatively few membranes with known 3D structure. This is likely due to technical challenges associated with membrane protein extraction, solubilization and purification. Membrane proteins are classified based on the level of interaction with membrane lipid bilayers, with peripheral membrane proteins associating non- covalently with the membrane, and integral membrane proteins associating more strongly by means of hydrophobic interactions. Generally speaking, peripheral membrane proteins can be purified by milder techniques than integral membrane proteins, whose extraction require phospholipid bilayer disruption by detergents. Here, important criteria for strategies of membrane protein purification are addressed, with a focus on the initial stages of membrane protein solublilization, where problems are most frequently are encountered. Protocols are outlined for the successful extraction of peripheral membrane proteins, solubilization of integral membrane proteins, and detergent removal which is important not only for retaining native protein stability and biological functions, but also for the efficiency of downstream purification techniques. Key Words: peripheral membrane protein, integral membrane protein, detergent, protein purification, protein solubilization. 1. Introduction Membrane proteins are associated with the membrane of a cell or particular organelle and are generally more problematic to purify than water-soluble proteins. Membrane proteins represent approximately 30 % of the open-reading frames of an organism’s genome (1-4), and play crucial roles in basic cell functions including signal transduction, energy production, nutrient uptake and cell-cell communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane Protein Structure Determination and Characterisation by Solution and Solid-State NMR
    biology Review Membrane Protein Structure Determination and Characterisation by Solution and Solid-State NMR Vivien Yeh , Alice Goode and Boyan B. Bonev * School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; [email protected] (V.Y.); [email protected] (A.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 October 2020; Accepted: 11 November 2020; Published: 12 November 2020 Simple Summary: Cells, life’s smallest units, are defined within the enclosure of thin, continuous membranes, which confine the molecular machinery required for the life and replication of cells. Crucially, membranes of cells establish and actively maintain distinctly different environments inside cells, including electrical and solute gradients vital to normal cellular functions. Membrane proteins are in charge of transport, electrical polarisation, signalling, membrane remodelling and other important functions. As such, membrane proteins are key drug targets and understanding their structure and function is essential to drug development and cellular control. Membrane proteins have physical characteristics that make such studies very challenging. Nuclear magnetic resonance is one advanced tool that enables structural studies of membrane proteins and their interactions at the atomic level of detail. We discuss the applications of NMR in solution and solid state to membrane protein studies alongside new developments in signal and sensitivity enhancement through dynamic nuclear polarisation. Abstract: Biological membranes define the interface of life and its basic unit, the cell. Membrane proteins play key roles in membrane functions, yet their structure and mechanisms remain poorly understood. Breakthroughs in crystallography and electron microscopy have invigorated structural analysis while failing to characterise key functional interactions with lipids, small molecules and membrane modulators, as well as their conformational polymorphism and dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Membrane-Protein Interactions
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 4 September 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201809.0055.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Biomolecules 2018, 8, 120; doi:10.3390/biom8040120 Review Modeling membrane-protein interactions Haleh Alimohamadi and Padmini Rangamani* Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, CA 92093, USA * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-858-534-4734 Abstract: In order to alter and adjust the shape of the membrane, cells harness various mechanisms of curvature generation. Many of these curvature generation mechanisms rely on the interactions between peripheral membrane 1 proteins, integral membrane proteins, and lipids in the bilayer membrane. One of the challenges in modeling these 2 processes is identifying the suitable constitutive relationships that describe the membrane free energy that includes 3 protein distribution and curvature generation capability. Here, we review some of the commonly used continuum elastic 4 membrane models that have been developed for this purpose and discuss their applications. Finally, we address some 5 fundamental challenges that future theoretical methods need to overcome in order to push the boundaries of current model 6 applications. 7 8 Keywords: Plasma membrane; Spontaneous curvature; Helfrich energy; Area difference elastic model; Protein crowding; Deviatoric curvature 9 10 11 1. Introduction 12 The ability of cellular membranes to bend and adapt their configurations is critical for a variety of cellular functions 13 including membrane trafficking processes [1,2], fission [3,4], fusion [5,6], differentiation [7], cell motility [8,9], and signal 14 transduction [10–12]. In order to dynamically reshape the membrane, cells rely on a variety of molecular mechanisms from 15 forces exerted by the cytoskeleton [13–15] and membrane-protein interactions [16–19].
    [Show full text]
  • A New Family of Start Domain Proteins at Membrane Contact Sites Has a Role in ER-PM 2 Sterol Transport
    1 A new family of StART domain proteins at membrane contact sites has a role in ER-PM 2 sterol transport. 3 4 Alberto T Gatta*1, Louise H Wong*1, Yves Y Sere*2, Diana M Calderón-Noreña2, Shamshad 5 Cockcroft3, Anant K Menon2 and Tim P Levine1‡. 6 * contributed equally to this work 7 8 Affiliations: 9 1. Dept of Cell Biology, UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, 11-43 Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK 10 2. Dept of Biochemistry, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY 10065, USA 11 3. Dept of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK 12 13 ‡ to whom correspondence should be addressed: email [email protected]; 14 phone +44/0–20 7608 4027/8 15 16 Major subject area: Cell biology 17 Funding information: AG: Marie Curie ITN “Sphingonet”; LW: Medical Research Council (UK); 18 YS and DMC-N: Qatar National Research Fund. 19 20 21 Competing Interests The authors declare that there are no competing interests. 1 22 ABSTRACT 23 Sterol traffic between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and plasma membrane (PM) is a 24 fundamental cellular process that occurs by a poorly understood non-vesicular mechanism. 25 We identified a novel, evolutionarily diverse family of ER membrane proteins with StART-like 26 lipid transfer domains and studied them in yeast. StART-like domains from Ysp2p and its 27 paralog Lam4p specifically bind sterols, and Ysp2p, Lam4p and their homologs Ysp1p and 28 Sip3p target punctate ER-PM contact sites distinct from those occupied by known ER-PM 29 tethers.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane Proteins Tutorial
    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology Theoretical and Computational Biophysics Group Computational Biophysics Workshop Membrane Proteins Tutorial Alek Aksimentiev Marcos Sotomayor David Wells Current editor: Paween Mahinthichaichan November 2016 2 A current version of this tutorial is available at http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Training/Tutorials/ Join the [email protected] mailing list for additional help. CONTENTS 3 Contents 1 Building a Structural Model of KcsA 6 1.1 Downloading and Viewing the Protein . 6 1.2 Examining the PDB File . 8 1.3 Building the KcsA Tetramer . 9 1.4 Generating PSF and PDB Files for KcsA . 12 1.5 Solvating the Protein (Optional) . 18 2 Placing KcsA in a Membrane 24 2.1 Building a Membrane Patch . 24 2.2 Alignment of Membrane and Protein . 25 2.3 Combination of Membrane and Protein . 26 2.4 Solvation and Ionization . 29 3 Running a Simulation of KcsA 34 3.1 Melting of Lipid Tails . 34 3.2 Minimization and Equilibration with Protein Constrained . 39 3.3 Equilibration with Protein Released . 41 3.4 Production Runs . 43 CONTENTS 4 Introduction This tutorial is designed to guide users of VMD and NAMD through all the steps required to set up a membrane protein system for molecular dynamics simulations. The tutorial assumes that you already have a working knowledge of VMD and NAMD. For the accompanying VMD and NAMD tutorials go to: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Training/Tutorials/ This tutorial has been designed specifically for VMD 1.8.6 and NAMD 2.6 but will also work with VMD 1.8.7 and NAMD 2.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Structure and Function of Myelin Protein P0 in Membrane
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/395491; this version posted August 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Molecular structure and function of myelin protein P0 in membrane stacking 2 Arne Raasakka1,2, Salla Ruskamo2, Julia Kowal3,4, Huijong Han2, Anne Baumann1,5, Matti Myllykoski2, 3 Anna Fasano6, Rocco Rossano7, Paolo Riccio7, Jochen Bürck8, Anne S. Ulrich8,9 Henning Stahlberg3 & Petri 4 Kursula1,2,† 5 1Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway 6 2Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine & Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland 7 3Center for Cellular Imaging and NanoAnalytics (C-CINA), Biozentrum, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland 8 4Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Department of Biology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland 9 5Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway 10 6Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari, Bari, Italy 11 7Department of Sciences, University of Basilicata, Potenza, Italy 12 8Institute of Biological Interfaces (IBG-2), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany 13 9Institute of Organic Chemistry, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany † 14 Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] 15 16 17 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/395491; this version posted August 19, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Abstract 2 Compact myelin forms the basis of nerve insulation essential for higher vertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Membrane-Protein Topology
    REVIEWS Membrane-protein topology Gunnar von Heijne Abstract | In the world of membrane proteins, topology defines an important halfway house between the amino-acid sequence and the fully folded three-dimensional structure. Although the concept of membrane-protein topology dates back at least 30 years, recent advances in the field of translocon-mediated membrane-protein assembly, proteome-wide studies of membrane-protein topology and an exponentially growing number of high- resolution membrane-protein structures have given us a deeper understanding of how topology is determined and of how it evolves. Topology In the year 2000, it all seemed so simple: membrane across the membrane in response to drastic changes in A specification of the number proteins of the helix-bundle type were built from long, lipid composition. However, whether such reorientation of transmembrane helices and hydrophobic α-helices that were orientated more or less phenomena are also part of the normal functioning of their in and/or out orientations perpendicularly to the membrane plane1. The topology membrane proteins is less clear. across the membrane in a membrane protein. of a membrane protein was just a description, listing In this review, I summarize the recent developments the segments of the polypeptide chain that form the in our understanding of membrane-protein topology and Fold space transmembrane helices and their orientation relative to structure. I aim to provide a (reasonably) integrated view The abstract space of all the membrane. of membrane-protein biogenesis, which starts from the protein folds. But now, 6 years on and 60 high-resolution membrane- basic process of helix integration into a membrane and ‘Knobs-into-holes’ geometry protein structures later, the picture is not so simple.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in the Composition of Plasma Membrane Proteins During Differentiation of Embryonic Chick Erythroid Cell
    Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 1062-1066, March 1977 Cell Biology Changes in the composition of plasma membrane proteins during differentiation of embryonic chick erythroid cell (red blood cell/development/membrane isolation and characterization/sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels) LEE-NIEN'L. CHAN Physiology Department, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Conn. 06032 Communicated by George E. Palade, November 29,1976 ABSTRACT Erythroid cells which are homogeneous with protein composition of plasma membranes from embryonic regard to sta e of maturation are naturally available from the chick erythroid cells at various stages of maturation. Significant circulation of chick embryos at various times of development. This provides a convenient system for examining the changes changes both in quality and in quantity of membrane proteins in plasma membrane protein composition during red cell mat- occur during embryonic erythroid differentiation. uration, Plasma membranes are isolated from chick embryonic erythroid cells at various stages of maturation. Extensive char- MATERIALS AND METHODS acterization of the isolated membranes show that they are pure Materials. Fertilized White Leghorn eggs are obtained from and their roteins undegraded. Analyses by sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis show that both the Spafas Co., Norwich, Conn. The eggs are incubated in a qualitative and quantitative changes occur in membrane protein Humidaire Incubator (model no. 50) at 380 (dry bulb) and 290 composition during the early stage of erythroid differentiation. (wet bulb). Red blood cells are collected from the circulation Specific proteins of red cell membrane such as "spectrin" and of the embryos after various times of incubation by cutting open band three proteins are present in low levels in early erythro- the main blood vessels and allowing the blood cells to be blasts but increase in their relative amounts with maturation.
    [Show full text]