DOCSLIB.ORG

Species Compensatory Responses and Biodiversity- Ecosystem Function Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Species Compensatory Responses and Biodiversity- Ecosystem Function Relations UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ocean and Earth Sciences Species compensatory responses and biodiversity- ecosystem function relations by Matthias Schmidt Thomsen Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2018 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF NATURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Ocean and Earth Sciences Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Species compensatory responses and biodiversity-ecosystem function relations Matthias Schmidt Thomsen Anthropogenic activities affect ecosystems and alter community dynamics and species interactions, which can have with significant consequences for biodiversity- function relations. Current knowledge on the role of biodiversity in mediating ecosystem processes and functions is largely derived from controlled, biodiversity manipulation experiments. However, these studies rarely account for species compensatory responses that potentially represent an important ecological response to perturbations in natural systems. Incorporating species compensation into empirical studies or predictive models has the potential to fundamentally change perceptions of the ecosystem consequences associated with changing biodiversity, but has received little attention. Here, I explicitly incorporate aspects of biodiversity change that have not previously been included within the biodiversity-ecosystem function framework. By adopting a range of approaches, including trait-based models, laboratory-based mesocosm experiments and field observations, I explore the role of compensation in marine benthic communities. Results show that scenarios of species loss that include community compensatory responses are fundamentally different to those where response mechanisms are excluded. However, the ecosystem consequences of compensation depend on the type and expression of compensation. I demonstrate that the functional traits of the species driving the compensatory response, and their relative abundance within the community, is highly important in determining the functional outcome of altered biodiversity. Although, a consistent feature across communities, irrespective of the driver of perturbation, the functional consequences of compensatory responses are also dependent on environmental context. The general paradigm that emerges is that compensatory responses exist in natural systems and are likely to alter the form of biodiversity-function relations, leading to changes in ecosystem properties that differ from current expectation. I conclude that, in order to project the ecosystem consequences of anticipated levels of biodiversity change, it will be necessary to acknowledge the role of compensation in natural systems to ensure the benefits that ecosystems provide society are sustained. Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ vii Academic Thesis: Declaration of Authorship ........................................................ xi Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ xiii Chapter 1: General Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................2 1.2 Thesis aims and objectives .......................................................... 10 Chapter 2: Consequences of biodiversity loss diverge from expectation due to post-extinction compensatory responses ..................... 13 2.1 Abstract ...................................................................................... 14 2.2 Introduction ................................................................................ 14 2.3 Methods ...................................................................................... 16 2.3.1 Sampling and study site ........................................................ 16 2.3.2 Extinction simulations ........................................................... 16 2.3.3 Compensation by common species ....................................... 17 2.3.4 Compensation by rare species ............................................... 17 2.3.5 Compensation by species from within/outwith or lower/higher functional grouping or which exhibit similar/distinct or lower/higher levels of activity ........................................... 18 2.4 Results ........................................................................................ 18 2.5 Discussion ................................................................................... 23 2.6 Acknowledgements ..................................................................... 25 Chapter 3: Compensatory responses can modify the form of the biodiversity-function relation curve contingent on post- extinction community composition .................................................. 27 3.1 Abstract ...................................................................................... 28 3.2 Introduction ................................................................................ 28 3.3 Methods ...................................................................................... 30 i 3.3.1 Faunal and sediment collection ............................................. 30 3.3.2 Experimental design ............................................................. 31 3.3.3 Measurements of ecosystem process and functioning ........... 32 3.3.4 Statistical analyses ............................................................... 32 3.4 Results ....................................................................................... 33 3.4.1 Effects on particle reworking and burrow ventilation ............. 33 3.4.2 Effects on nutrient generation .............................................. 37 3.5 Discussion .................................................................................. 39 3.6 Acknowledgements ..................................................................... 42 Chapter 4: Capacity of benthic communities in sustaining ecosystem functioning depends on the intensity of anthropogenic forcing ................................................................................................................ 43 4.1 Abstract ...................................................................................... 44 4.2 Introduction ................................................................................ 44 4.3 Methods ..................................................................................... 47 4.3.1 Area of study ....................................................................... 47 4.3.2 Sample collection ................................................................. 47 4.3.3 Approach, analysis and data ................................................. 49 4.3.4 BQPc ..................................................................................... 51 4.3.5 Species evenness J’ ............................................................... 52 4.4 Results ....................................................................................... 52 4.5 Discussion .................................................................................. 60 4.6 Acknowledgements ..................................................................... 63 Chapter 5: Environmental perturbation destabilises benthic community structure and dynamics ............................................................................ 65 5.1 Abstract ...................................................................................... 66 5.2 Introduction ................................................................................ 66 5.3 Methods ..................................................................................... 68 5.4 Results ....................................................................................... 70 5.5 Discussion .................................................................................. 77 5.6 Acknowledgements ..................................................................... 79 ii Chapter 6: General Discussion ..................................................................................... 81 6.1 Summary of main conclusions and recommendations ................... 88 Appendices .............................................................................................................................. 93 Appendix A ............................................................................................................................... 95 Appendix B ............................................................................................................................ 100 Appendix C ............................................................................................................................ 124 Appendix D ........................................................................................................................... 133 Appendix F ............................................................................................................................ 156 List of References ............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contrat De Prestations Ifremer 2017 Contrôle De Surveillance
    Contrat de prestations Ifremer 2017 Contrôle de surveillance 2017 DCE de la faune benthique de substrat meuble des masses d’eau côtière « FRFC01 Côte Nord-Est île d’Oléron » et « FRFC02 Pertuis Charentais » : rapport final AUBERT F.1, 2, JOURDE J.2, PRINEAU M.2, LEGUAY D.3, SAURIAU P.-G.2 1 ADERA – Cellule Cohabys, 162 avenue A. Schweitzer, 33608 Pessac 2 LIENSs, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges, 17000 La Rochelle 3 IFREMER, Station de la Rochelle, Place Gaby Coll, BP 7, 17137 L’Houmeau Juin 2018 Sommaire 1 - INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 1 2 - MATERIEL & METHODES .......................................................................... 4 2.1 - STRATEGIE D’ECHANTILLONNAGE .................................................................... 4 2.2 - PROTOCOLE DE PRELEVEMENT ......................................................................... 5 2.2.1 - Prélèvements subtidaux à la benne Van Veen .......................................... 5 2.2.2 - Prélèvements intertidaux au carottier ...................................................... 6 2.3 - PRESENTATION DES STATIONS .......................................................................... 7 2.3.1 - Malconche : station subtidale ................................................................... 7 2.3.2 - Boyardville : station subtidale d’appui .................................................... 8 2.3.3 - Bellevue : station intertidale ..................................................................... 9 2.3.4
    [Show full text]
  • Ventrosia Maritima (Milaschewitsch, 1916) and V. Ventrosa (Montagu
    Folia Malacol. 22(1): 61–67 http://dx.doi.org/10.12657/folmal.022.006 VENTROSIA MARITIMA (MILASCHEWITSCH, 1916) AND V. VENTROSA (MONTAGU, 1803) IN GREECE: MOLECULAR DATA AS A SOURCE OF INFORMATION ABOUT SPECIES RANGES WITHIN THE HYDROBIINAE (CAENOGASTROPODA: TRUNCATELLOIDEA) MAGDALENA SZAROWSKA, ANDRZEJ FALNIOWSKI Department of Malacology, Institute of Zoology, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, 30-387 Cracow, Poland (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: Using molecular data (DNA sequences of mitochondrial COI and nuclear ribosomal 18SrRNA genes), we describe the occurrence of two species of Ventrosia Radoman, 1977: V. ventrosa (Montagu, 1803) and V. maritima (Milaschewitsch, 1916) in Greece. These species are found at two disjunct localities: V. ventrosa at the west coast of Peloponnese (Ionian Sea) and V. maritima on Milos Island in the Cyclades (Aegean Sea). Our findings expand the known ranges of both species: we provide the first molecularly confirmed record of V. ventrosa in Greece, and extend the range of the presumably Pontic V. maritima nearly 500 km SSW into the Aegean Sea. Our data confirm the species distinctness of V. maritima. KEY WORDS: Truncatelloidea, COI, 18S rRNA, shell, Ventrosia, species distinctness, species range INTRODUCTION Data on the Greek Hydrobiinae, inhabiting brack- flock of species that are not differentiated morpho- ish waters, are less than scarce. SCHÜTT (1980) did logically or ecologically. Thus, at a species level in not list any species belonging to this subfamily in the Hydrobiinae, molecular characters are inevita- his monograph on the Greek Hydrobiidae. Although bly necessary to distinguish a taxon (e.g. WILKE & MUUS (1963, 1967) demonstrated that the mor- DAVIS 2000, WILKE & FALNIOWSKI 2001, WILKE & phology of the penis and the head pigmentation PFENNIGER 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic
    water Review Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic Valentina S. Artamonova 1, Ivan N. Bolotov 2,3,4, Maxim V. Vinarski 4 and Alexander A. Makhrov 1,4,* 1 A. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Phylogenetics, Northern Arctic Federal University, 163002 Arkhangelsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia 4 Laboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Analysis of zoogeographic, paleogeographic, and molecular data has shown that the ancestors of many fresh- and brackish-water cold-tolerant hydrobionts of the Mediterranean region and the Danube River basin likely originated in East Asia or Central Asia. The fish genera Gasterosteus, Hucho, Oxynoemacheilus, Salmo, and Schizothorax are examples of these groups among vertebrates, and the genera Magnibursatus (Trematoda), Margaritifera, Potomida, Microcondylaea, Leguminaia, Unio (Mollusca), and Phagocata (Planaria), among invertebrates. There is reason to believe that their ancestors spread to Europe through the Paratethys (or the proto-Paratethys basin that preceded it), where intense speciation took place and new genera of aquatic organisms arose. Some of the forms that originated in the Paratethys colonized the Mediterranean, and overwhelming data indicate that Citation: Artamonova, V.S.; Bolotov, representatives of the genera Salmo, Caspiomyzon, and Ecrobia migrated during the Miocene from I.N.; Vinarski, M.V.; Makhrov, A.A.
    [Show full text]
  • WMSDB - Worldwide Mollusc Species Data Base
    WMSDB - Worldwide Mollusc Species Data Base Family: TURBINIDAE Author: Claudio Galli - [email protected] (updated 07/set/2015) Class: GASTROPODA --- Clade: VETIGASTROPODA-TROCHOIDEA ------ Family: TURBINIDAE Rafinesque, 1815 (Sea) - Alphabetic order - when first name is in bold the species has images Taxa=681, Genus=26, Subgenus=17, Species=203, Subspecies=23, Synonyms=411, Images=168 abyssorum , Bolma henica abyssorum M.M. Schepman, 1908 aculeata , Guildfordia aculeata S. Kosuge, 1979 aculeatus , Turbo aculeatus T. Allan, 1818 - syn of: Epitonium muricatum (A. Risso, 1826) acutangulus, Turbo acutangulus C. Linnaeus, 1758 acutus , Turbo acutus E. Donovan, 1804 - syn of: Turbonilla acuta (E. Donovan, 1804) aegyptius , Turbo aegyptius J.F. Gmelin, 1791 - syn of: Rubritrochus declivis (P. Forsskål in C. Niebuhr, 1775) aereus , Turbo aereus J. Adams, 1797 - syn of: Rissoa parva (E.M. Da Costa, 1778) aethiops , Turbo aethiops J.F. Gmelin, 1791 - syn of: Diloma aethiops (J.F. Gmelin, 1791) agonistes , Turbo agonistes W.H. Dall & W.H. Ochsner, 1928 - syn of: Turbo scitulus (W.H. Dall, 1919) albidus , Turbo albidus F. Kanmacher, 1798 - syn of: Graphis albida (F. Kanmacher, 1798) albocinctus , Turbo albocinctus J.H.F. Link, 1807 - syn of: Littorina saxatilis (A.G. Olivi, 1792) albofasciatus , Turbo albofasciatus L. Bozzetti, 1994 albofasciatus , Marmarostoma albofasciatus L. Bozzetti, 1994 - syn of: Turbo albofasciatus L. Bozzetti, 1994 albulus , Turbo albulus O. Fabricius, 1780 - syn of: Menestho albula (O. Fabricius, 1780) albus , Turbo albus J. Adams, 1797 - syn of: Rissoa parva (E.M. Da Costa, 1778) albus, Turbo albus T. Pennant, 1777 amabilis , Turbo amabilis H. Ozaki, 1954 - syn of: Bolma guttata (A. Adams, 1863) americanum , Lithopoma americanum (J.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum MOLLUSCA
    285 MOLLUSCA: SOLENOGASTRES-POLYPLACOPHORA Phylum MOLLUSCA Class SOLENOGASTRES Family Lepidomeniidae NEMATOMENIA BANYULENSIS (Pruvot, 1891, p. 715, as Dondersia) Occasionally on Lafoea dumosa (R.A.T., S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 42-49 fm., on Lafoea dumosa (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368): Eddystone, 29 fm., 1920 (R.W.): 7, 3, 1 and 1 in 4 hauls N.E. of Eddystone, 1948 (V.F.) Breeding: gonads ripe in Aug. (R.A.T.) Family Neomeniidae NEOMENIA CARINATA Tullberg, 1875, p. 1 One specimen Rame-Eddystone Grounds, 29.12.49 (V.F.) Family Proneomeniidae PRONEOMENIA AGLAOPHENIAE Kovalevsky and Marion [Pruvot, 1891, p. 720] Common on Thecocarpus myriophyllum, generally coiled around the base of the stem of the hydroid (S.P., E.J.A.): at 4 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 43-49 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 367): S. of Rame Head, 27 fm., 1920 (R.W.): N. of Eddystone, 29.3.33 (A.J.S.) Class POLYPLACOPHORA (=LORICATA) Family Lepidopleuridae LEPIDOPLEURUS ASELLUS (Gmelin) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 407, as Chiton; Matthews, 1953, p. 246] Abundant, 15-30 fm., especially on muddy gravel (S.P.): at 9 positions S.W. of Eddystone, 40-43 fm. (Crawshay, 1912, p. 368, as Craspedochilus onyx) SALCOMBE. Common in dredge material (Allen and Todd, 1900, p. 210) LEPIDOPLEURUS, CANCELLATUS (Sowerby) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p. 410, as Chiton; Matthews. 1953, p. 246] Wembury West Reef, three specimens at E.L.W.S.T. by J. Brady, 28.3.56 (G.M.S.) Family Lepidochitonidae TONICELLA RUBRA (L.) [Forbes and Hanley, 1849, II, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Research at National Museums Scotland
    Scottish Saline Lagoons: Looking Under the Surface Katherine Whyte @katey_whyte #SalineLagoons Lab Work Fieldwork Nature My job... Sharing my Outreach Research Species Identification Saline Lagoons Coastal water bodies that have a restricted connection to the sea. Saline Lagoons Coastal water bodies that have a restricted connection to the sea. FRESHWATER BRACKISH SALINE The Lagoon Spectrum Saline Lagoons in Scotland 106 sites 3,000 hectares From: Chambers et al., 2015 Saline Lagoons in Scotland Easdale Quarries (6) Easdale Lagoon, Seil Easdale Quarry, Seil Loch Caithlim, Seil Leth-fhonn (off Loch Don), Mull Loch a’ Chumhainn, Dervaig, Mull Craiglin Lagoon, Loch Sween Dubh Loch, Loch Fyne Disrupted water flow Climate change Threats Coastal erosion Invasive species Pollution Saline Lagoon Legislation EC Habitats Directive (1992) Annex I: Priority Habitat UK Biodiversity Action Plan (1999, 2007): Priority Habitat UK Post-2010 Biodiversity Framework (2012) 2020 Challenge for Scotland’s Biodiversity (2013) EC Water Framework Directive (2000) Water Environment and Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003 SACs, SSSIs, SPAs Lagoon Specialists Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Idotea chelipes Lekanesphaera hookeri Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Idotea chelipes Idotea chelipes Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Idotea chelipes Idotea chelipes Idotea baltica Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Idotea chelipes Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Patella vulgata Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Chthamalus Patella vulgata stellatus Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Chthamalus Idotea chelipes Patella vulgata stellatus Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Lekanesphaera hookeri Lagoon Specialists: Isopods Idotea chelipes Lekanesphaera hookeri Lagoon Specialists: Mudsnails Ecrobia ventrosa Hydrobia acuta neglecta Mudsnail Identification Lagoon Specialists: Cockles Cerastoderma glaucum Lagoon Specialists: Cockles Lagoon cockle Common cockle (Cerastoderma glaucum) (Cerastoderma edule) Shell edge forms Shell edge forms 2 contact points 1 contact point with a needle.
    [Show full text]
  • Illalopezlaia-TFG.Pdf
    Facultat de Ciències Memòria del Treball Final de Grau Títol del treball: Vulnerabilitat de les comunitats bentòniques a l'impacte de la pesca d'arrossegament: estudi dels caladors de Blanes. Estudiant: Laia Illa i López Grau en Biologia Correu electrònic: Tutor: Dr. Josep Lloret Cotutor*: Dra. Montserrat Demestre Empresa / institució: Vistiplau tutor (i cotutor*): Nom del tutor: Nom del cotutor*: Empresa / institució: Correu(s) electrònic(s): *si hi ha un cotutor assignat Data de dipòsit de la memòria a secretaria de coordinació: Índex Resum .............................................................................................................................................. i Resumen .......................................................................................................................................... i Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... ii Introducció ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Arts de pesca ............................................................................................................................... 3 Impactes ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Objectives. .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • T.C. Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Orta
    T.C. ORDU ÜNİVERSİTESİ FEN BİLİMLERİ ENSTİTÜSÜ ORTA KARADENİZ’DEKİ MOLLUSCA FAUNASI VE KATALOGLANMASI MUSTAFA BİÇER Bu tez, Balıkçılık Teknolojisi Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalında Yüksek Lisans derecesi için hazırlanmıştır. ORDU 2014 TEZ BİLDİRİMİ Tez yazım kurallarına uygun olarak hazırlanan bu tezin yazılmasında bilimsel ahlak kurallarına uyulduğunu, başkalarının eserlerinden yararlanılması durumunda bilimsel normlara uygun olarak atıfta bulunulduğunu, tezin içerdiği yenilik ve sonuçların başka bir yerden alınmadığını, kullanılan verilerde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmadığını, tezin herhangi bir kısmının bu üniversite veya başka bir üniversitedeki başka bir tez çalışması olarak sunulmadığını beyan ederim. İmza Mustafa BİÇER Not: Bu tezde kullanılan özgün ve başka kaynaktan yapılan bildirişlerin, çizelge, şekil ve fotoğrafların kaynak gösterilmeden kullanımı, 5846 sayılı Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunundaki hükümlere tabidir. I ÖZET ORTA KARADENİZ’ DEKİ MOLLUSCA FAUNASI VE KATALOGLANMASI Mustafa BİÇER Ordu Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Balıkçılık Teknolojisi Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, 2014 Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 60s Danışman: Yrd. Doç. Dr. Mehmet AYDIN Bu çalışma ile Orta Karadeniz’de birçok sayıda familya ve cins ile temsil edilen mollusca sınıfına ait türlerin Ordu İlindeki dağılımının belirlenmesi ve araştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Mollusca türlerini tespit etmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilen bu çalışmada, derinlikleri 0-25 m arasında değişen 14 istasyondan örneklemeler yapılmıştır. Araştırma mediolittoral bölgeden elle, dalarak ve el direcleri
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate Animals (Metazoa: Invertebrata) of the Atanasovsko Lake, Bulgaria
    Historia naturalis bulgarica, 22: 45-71, 2015 Invertebrate Animals (Metazoa: Invertebrata) of the Atanasovsko Lake, Bulgaria Zdravko Hubenov, Lyubomir Kenderov, Ivan Pandourski Abstract: The role of the Atanasovsko Lake for storage and protection of the specific faunistic diversity, characteristic of the hyper-saline lakes of the Bulgarian seaside is presented. The fauna of the lake and surrounding waters is reviewed, the taxonomic diversity and some zoogeographical and ecological features of the invertebrates are analyzed. The lake system includes from freshwater to hyper-saline basins with fast changing environment. A total of 6 types, 10 classes, 35 orders, 82 families and 157 species are known from the Atanasovsko Lake and the surrounding basins. They include 56 species (35.7%) marine and marine-brackish forms and 101 species (64.3%) brackish-freshwater, freshwater and terrestrial forms, connected with water. For the first time, 23 species in this study are established (12 marine, 1 brackish and 10 freshwater). The marine and marine- brackish species have 4 types of ranges – Cosmopolitan, Atlantic-Indian, Atlantic-Pacific and Atlantic. The Atlantic (66.1%) and Cosmopolitan (23.2%) ranges that include 80% of the species, predominate. Most of the fauna (over 60%) has an Atlantic-Mediterranean origin and represents an impoverished Atlantic-Mediterranean fauna. The freshwater-brackish, freshwater and terrestrial forms, connected with water, that have been established from the Atanasovsko Lake, have 2 main types of ranges – species, distributed in the Palaearctic and beyond it and species, distributed only in the Palaearctic. The representatives of the first type (52.4%) predomi- nate. They are related to the typical marine coastal habitats, optimal for the development of certain species.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 2.4MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236 (2014) Published December 2014 ISSN 1447-2546 (Print) 1447-2554 (On-line) http://museumvictoria.com.au/about/books-and-journals/journals/memoirs-of-museum-victoria/ Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Müller and M. Sars EIVIND OUG1,* (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:EF42540F-7A9E-486F-96B7-FCE9F94DC54A), TORKILD BAKKEN2 (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:FA79392C-048E-4421-BFF8-71A7D58A54C7) AND JON ANDERS KONGSRUD3 (http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:4AF3F49E-9406-4387-B282-73FA5982029E) 1 Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Region South, Jon Lilletuns vei 3, NO-4879 Grimstad, Norway ([email protected]) 2 Norwegian University of Science and Technology, University Museum, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway ([email protected]) 3 University Museum of Bergen, University of Bergen, PO Box 7800, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway ([email protected]) * To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Oug, E., Bakken, T. and Kongsrud, J.A. 2014. Original specimens and type localities of early described polychaete species (Annelida) from Norway, with particular attention to species described by O.F. Müller and M. Sars. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 71: 217–236. Early descriptions of species from Norwegian waters are reviewed, with a focus on the basic requirements for re- assessing their characteristics, in particular, by clarifying the status of the original material and locating sampling sites. A large number of polychaete species from the North Atlantic were described in the early period of zoological studies in the 18th and 19th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Variability in Recruitment of an Infaunal Bivalve
    Spatial Variability in Recruitment of an Infaunal Bivalve: Experimental Effects of Predator Exclusion on the Softshell Clam (Mya arenaria L.) along Three Tidal Estuaries in Southern Maine, USA Author(s): Brian F. Beal, Chad R. Coffin, Sara F. Randall, Clint A. Goodenow Jr., Kyle E. Pepperman, Bennett W. Ellis, Cody B. Jourdet and George C. Protopopescu Source: Journal of Shellfish Research, 37(1):1-27. Published By: National Shellfisheries Association https://doi.org/10.2983/035.037.0101 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2983/035.037.0101 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1–27, 2018. SPATIAL VARIABILITY IN RECRUITMENT OF AN INFAUNAL BIVALVE: EXPERIMENTAL EFFECTS OF PREDATOR EXCLUSION ON THE SOFTSHELL CLAM (MYA ARENARIA L.) ALONG THREE TIDAL ESTUARIES IN SOUTHERN MAINE, USA 1,2 3 2 3 BRIAN F.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]