DOCSLIB.ORG

Shipley Park, Horsley and Horsley Wood House, Smalley and Mapperley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shipley Park, Horsley and Horsley Wood House, Smalley and Mapperley Area Profile: Shipley Park, Horsley and Horsley Wood House, Smalley and Mapperley Key Characteristics: Population: 5,975 Population Density: 2.1 Number of Households: 2,523 Area: 2712 hectares Census 2011 The area of Shipley Park, Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse is located to the south of Amber Valley Borough and includes the smaller villages of Coxbench, Smalley and Mapperley. The area adjoins the district of Erewash and it is approximately 6 miles north of Derby and 4 miles west of Nottingham. The area is served by several road transport links including the A38 and A61 on its western boundary. The area is largely rural in character with attractive landscapes, cultural spaces and biological assets. Much of the area was untouched by industrial development in the region, with agriculture traditionally being the most important industry in the area. However, at present, economic activity in the area is restricted and below the Amber Valley average but its housing market contains a mix of good to fair quality housing stock, which has experienced moderate growth over the past decade. 1 Improving Places and Community Needs Local Area: Shipley Park, Horsley, Horsley Woodhouse, Smalley and Mapperley covers 2712 hectares of land in the south of the Borough. Population: At the 2011 Census the population of Shipley Park, Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse was 5,975. Population Density: The population density of the area is 2.1 people / hectare, which is significantly lower than the Borough average of 4.6 people / hectare. Most of its population is concentrated in the settlements of Smalley and Horsley Woodhouse and on the southern side of Heanor. Age: At the Census 2011, 41% of people were aged between 30 – 59, which is equal to the Borough average for that age group. Shipley Park, Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse has a lower proportion of children and young adults than the Borough overall and consequently a higher proportion of people aged 60+. Figure 1: Age Groups Shipley, Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse Amber Valley Age 0 – 17 years 1,121 18.9% 24,360 20.1% 18 – 29 years 596 10% 15,340 12.6% 30 – 59 years 2,449 41% 50,381 41.2% 60 – 74 years 1,210 20.3% 21,675 17.7% 75 + years 599 10% 10,263 8.4% Source: 2011 Census Ethnicity: The people living in Shipley Park, Horsley & Horsley Woodhouse are predominantly White (98.7%) with a small but diverse proportion of ethnic minorities residing in the area. Religion: The majority of people are of Christian belief (66.3%) followed by those with no religion (25%). Nationality: The majority of people were born in England (96.3%) followed by elsewhere in the UK (1.5%). Household Composition: The largest household group in Shipley Park, Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse is married with no children, followed closely by married with dependent children. However, one person households make up 25% of all households. There is a higher proportion of households consisting of married couples in the ward (42%) compared to the Borough average of 37%. 2 Figure 2: Household Type Amber Household Type (Percentage) Shipley, Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse Valley Household (total) 2,523 52,596 1 person age 65+ 13 12.8 1 person under 65 12 15.1 Family, all 65+ 12.3 9.6 Family, married/civil no children 17.8 15.4 Family, married/civil dependent children 17.4 15.4 Family, married/civil all children non-dep. 6.4 6.3 Family, co-habiting no children 5.8 6.4 Family, co-habiting dependent children 3.6 4.7 Family, co-habiting all children non-dep. 0.8 0.6 Family, lone parent dependent children 3.5 5.8 Family, lone parent all children non-dep. 3.6 3.4 Other households with dep. children 1.5 1.7 Other - all students 0 0 Other - all age 65+ 0.3 0.3 Other 2.1 2.8 Source: 2011 Census Service Provision Shopping Services: 0 Major Food Store: 0 Market: 0 Post Office: 1 35 Main Road, Smalley Pharmacy: 1 Arthur Medical Practice, Horsley Woodhouse Dentists: 0 GP Surgeries: 1 Arthur Medical Practice, Horsley Woodhouse Community Clinics: 0 3 A&E Hospital: 0 Nearest Derby Royal Infirmary Hospital: 0 Opticians: 0 Infant School: 0 Junior School: 0 Primary School: 4 Secondary School: 1 College: 0 University in locality: Derby University (out of Borough). Adult Education: 0 Places of worship: 2 Restaurants and Cafes: 0 Hotels: 0 Leisure Centres: 0 Child Care: 18 Childminders 2 Toddler Groups Sure Start Centres: 0 Job Centre: 0 Nearest Heanor Community Safety Crime Rates: The level of crime in Shipley Park, Horsley & Horsley Woodhouse varies. Overall the ward is ranked 11th (1st=worst), however for certain crimes the ward fares less well. For drug offences it has the 3rd worst rates in the Borough and for theft and burglary it is 7th worst. 4 Figure 3: Anti-Social Behaviour and Crime Rates (Rate / 1000 people) Shipley, Horsley Amber Valley Rank and Horsley (1=worst) Woodhouse Anti-Social Behaviour 32.8 41.3 12th Criminal damage / arson 4.7 8.3 16th Theft / burglary 23.3 24.1 7th Violence with injury 1.5 3.8 15th Violence without injury 2.3 2.9 13th Public disorder 0 0.6 =23rd Drug offences 3.8 2.5 3rd Shoplifting 0 4.2 =23rd Source: Safer Derbyshire Research & Information Team, Derbyshire County Council Jan – Dec 2013 Housing Figure 4: Housing Affordability Borrowing ratio 95% house price to average income Shipley 6.4 Horsley 12 Horsley Woodhouse 4.4 Amber Valley 4.2 Source: CACI Paycheck 2013 and Zoopla 2014 House prices vary considerably across the ward with the average in Horsley being 65% higher than the Borough average and those in Horsley Woodhouse being only 4.7% higher. Consequently affordability varies. Figure 5: Average House Prices Area Detached Semi- Terraced Flat / Average Detached Maisonette Shipley £286,905 £154,032 - - £229,771 Horsley £583,314 £188,622 £207,740 - £430,660 Horsley £234,982 £130,505 £110,026 - £158,517 Woodhouse Amber Valley £223,995 £124,930 £96,841 £122,389 £151,011 Source: Amber Valley figures – http://news.bbc.co.uk/ based on April-June 2013 sales Source: for Wards http://www.zoopla.co.uk based on Feb 2014 current values Affordable Housing Rates: No affordable dwellings have been built in Shipley Park, Horsley & Horsley Woodhouse between 2008-2013. 5 Housing Stock Condition: The Amber Valley Housing Condition Survey 2010 states that 38% of homes in the ward are non-decent and that 13% of vulnerable households live in non-decent homes. Figure 6: Amber Valley Housing Stock Condition Survey Results 2010 homes Of non % facilities modern lacking Of households % comfort thermal lacking Of households % homes non householdsin vulnerable Of households % disrepair in dwellings Of total % - decent decent - decent decent Shipley Park, 38 1 8 13 16 Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse Amber Valley 37 1 15 12 15 Source: Amber Valley Housing Stock Survey 2010 Type: The majority of dwellings are detached (51.7%) followed by semi-detached dwellings (32.5%). (Census, 2011) Tenure: At the 2011 Census the majority of people own their property (83%) which is higher than the Borough average of (74%). Figure 7: Tenure Shipley, Horsley and Horsley Type of Tenure Woodhouse Amber Valley All 100% 100% Owned (outright) 45.1% 38.2% Owned (mortgage/loan) 38% 35.9% Shared ownership 0.3% 0.4% Social rented (LA) 3.7% 5.1% Social rented (other) 4.4% 7.2% Private rent 7.2% 11.8% Living rent free 1.3% 1.4% Source: 2011 Census Communal Establishments: At the 2011 Census there were 8 communal establishments with 77 residents in total. Ward Building Rates: A total of 24 dwellings have been developed over the last five years, which is 2% of the total number of dwellings developed within the Borough. 6 Figure 8: Ward Building Rates FIVE YEAR HOUSING LAND SUPPLY WARD BUILDING RATES Area 2008 – 2009 – 2010 – 2011 – 2012 – TOTAL 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Shipley, Horsley and 1 2 7 4 10 24 Horsley Woodhouse Amber Valley 334 214 256 206 219 1229 Source: Amber Valley Borough Council house building records Vacant Properties: At October 2013 there were 26 privately owned empty properties. Local Plan Part 1 – The Core Strategy: No dwellings are proposed for allocation in the Shipley, Horsley and Horsley Woodhouse area in Local Plan Part 1 – The Core Strategy. 18 potential sites have been identified in the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) for Amber Valley. Health General Health: The majority of residents (79.7%) stated that they were in very good or good health which is on par with the Borough average. Figure 9: General Health Shipley, Horsley and Horsley Percentages Woodhouse Amber Valley East Midlands England All People 100% 100% 100% 100% Very Good Health 46.2 44.0 45.3 47.2 Good Health 33.5 35.0 35.1 34.2 Fair Health 15.4 15.0 14.0 13.1 Bad Health 3.7 4.8 4.3 4.2 Very Bad Health 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 Source: 2011 Census Multiple Deprivations: The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) published by the Government in 2010 indicates that Lower Super Output Areas (LSOAs) in Shipley Park, Horsley, Horsley Woodhouse, Smalley and Mapperley are experiencing varying levels of deprivation. Two of its neighbourhoods are ranked within the 50% most deprived in the country and two are ranked in the 50% least deprived. One LSOA is in the 20% least deprived in the Borough. By contrast one LSOA is on the 50% most deprived for Health and Disability.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • School Administrator South Wingfield Primary School Church Lane South Wingfield Alfreton Derbyshire DE55 7NJ
    School Administrator South Wingfield Primary School Church Lane South Wingfield Alfreton Derbyshire DE55 7NJ School Administrator Newhall Green High School Brailsford Primary School Da Vinci Community College Newall Green High School Main Road St Andrew's View Greenbrow Road Brailsford Ashbourne Breadsall Manchester Derbys Derby Greater Manchester DE6 3DA DE21 4ET M23 2SX School Administrator School Administrator School Administrator Tower View Primary School Little Eaton Primary School Ockbrook School Vancouver Drive Alfreton Road The Settlement Winshill Little Eaton Ockbrook Burton On Trent Derby Derby DE15 0EZ DE21 5AB Derbyshire DE72 3RJ Meadow Lane Infant School Fritchley Under 5's Playgroup Jesse Gray Primary School Meadow Lane The Chapel Hall Musters Road Chilwell Chapel Street West Bridgford Nottinghamshire Fritchley Belper Nottingham NG9 5AA DE56 2FR Nottinghamshire NG2 7DD South East Derbyshire College School Administrator Field Road Oakwood Junior School Ilkeston Holbrook Road Derbyshire Alvaston DE7 5RS Derby Derbyshire DE24 0DD School Secretary School Secretary Leaps and Bounds Day Nursery Holmefields Primary School Ashcroft Primary School Wellington Court Parkway Deepdale Lane Belper Chellaston Sinfin Derbyshire Derby Derby DE56 1UP DE73 1NY Derbyshire DE24 3HF School Administrator Derby Grammar School School Administrator All Saints C of E Primary School Derby Grammar School Wirksworth Infant School Tatenhill Lane Rykneld Road Harrison Drive Rangemore Littleover Wirksworth Burton on Trent Derby Matlock Staffordshire Derbyshire
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire Parish Registers. Marriages
    ^iiii iii! mwmm mmm: 'mm m^ iilili! U 942-51019 ^. Aalp V.8 1379096 GENEAUO^JY COLLECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00727 4282 DERBYSHIRE PARISH REGISTERS. riDarrtages. VIII. PHILLIMORES PARISH REGISTER SERIES. VOL. CLXIV (DERBYSHIRE, VOL. VIII.) One hundred and fifty printed. uf-ecj.^. Derbyshire Parish Registers. (IDarriaoes. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND Ll. Ll. SIMPSON. VOL. VIII. yJ HonOon: Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., Ltd., 124, Chancery Lane. — PREFACE This volume of Marriage Registers, the eighth of the Derbyshire series, contains the Registers of nine parishes, besides an odd Register for Ilkeston parish, omitted from the last volume. 1379096 It has not been thought needful to print the entries verbatim. They are reduced to a common form, and the following con- tractions, as before, have been freely used : w. = widower or widow. p. = of the parish of. co. = in the county of. dioc.= in the diocese of. lie. = marriage licence. It should be remembered that previous to 1752 the year was calculated as beginning on the 25th March, instead of the I St of January, so that a Marriage taking place on say 20th February, 1625, would be on that date in 1626 according to our reckoning ; but as the civil and ecclesiastical year were both used, this is sometimes expressed by 20th February, i62f. In all cases where the marriage is stated to have taken place by Licence, that fact is recorded, as the searcher thereby knows that further information as to age, parentage, and voca- tion of the parties is probably recoverable from the Allegations in the Archdeaconry or other ofifice from which the Licence was issued.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Blacksmith's Arms
    Land off North Road, Glossop Education Impact Assessment Report v1-4 (Initial Research Feedback) for Gladman Developments 12th June 2013 Report by Oliver Nicholson EPDS Consultants Conifers House Blounts Court Road Peppard Common Henley-on-Thames RG9 5HB 0118 978 0091 www.epds-consultants.co.uk 1. Introduction 1.1.1. EPDS Consultants has been asked to consider the proposed development for its likely impact on schools in the local area. 1.2. Report Purpose & Scope 1.2.1. The purpose of this report is to act as a principle point of reference for future discussions with the relevant local authority to assist in the negotiation of potential education-specific Section 106 agreements pertaining to this site. This initial report includes an analysis of the development with regards to its likely impact on local primary and secondary school places. 1.3. Intended Audience 1.3.1. The intended audience is the client, Gladman Developments, and may be shared with other interested parties, such as the local authority(ies) and schools in the area local to the proposed development. 1.4. Research Sources 1.4.1. The contents of this initial report are based on publicly available information, including relevant data from central government and the local authority. 1.5. Further Research & Analysis 1.5.1. Further research may be conducted after this initial report, if required by the client, to include a deeper analysis of the local position regarding education provision. This activity may include negotiation with the relevant local authority and the possible submission of Freedom of Information requests if required.
    [Show full text]
  • Awsworth Neigbourhood Plan
    Awsworth Parish Council SUBMISSION DRAFT OCTOBER 2019 Cover Photo – Aerial View of Awsworth and Erewash Valley – By courtesy of Harworth Estates Artwork by Sue Campbell – Photos by Michael Smith (unless otherwise attributed) Page | 1 Awsworth Neighbourhood Plan Submission Draft 2019 OUR VISION ‘By 2030, Awsworth Parish will be a safer and more attractive area. It will value the local community and their aspirations and provide people with a sense of pride and belonging. It will be a thriving and vibrant place, where everyone can be involved and contribute.’ Page | 2 Awsworth Neighbourhood Plan Submission Draft 2019 CONTENTS PAGE List of Policies 4 Foreword 6 1.0 Introduction 7 2.0 Awsworth – Place, Past & Present 11 3.0 Issues & Opportunities 30 4.0 Community Vision & Objectives 33 5.0 ‘Awsworth Future’ – Neighbourhood Plan Policies 34 6.0 Housing 35 7.0 Built Environment & Design 48 8.0 Green & Blue Infrastructure 61 9.0 Community Facilities & Shops 83 10.0 Employment & Economy 91 11.0 Traffic & Transport 96 12.0 Bennerley Viaduct & Nottingham Canal 106 13.0 Former Bennerley Coal Disposal Point 115 14.0 Developer Contributions 118 15.0 Delivering the Plan 119 APPENDICES Appendix 1 - Awsworth Parish Projects 120 Appendix 2 - Awsworth Housing Numbers & Type Street by Street 127 Appendix 3 - Building for Life (BfL) 12 Criteria 128 NOTE – a separate POLICIES MAP accompanies this Plan & its Policies 130 NOTE – an accompanying BACKGROUND DOCUMENT contains the following reports Background Report 1 - Assessment of Housing Needs & Characteristics
    [Show full text]
  • The First Derbyshire County RBL Magazine
    The Magazine of the Royal British Legion in Derbyshire February/March 2014 Incorporating the Derbyshire LegionLetter Newsletter Registered Charity No. 219279 Shoulder to shoulder with all who serve Vol. 4 Issue 3 County Conference Edition County Chaplin Rev Dr Jocelyn Lewis, Jessica Lee MP, County Vice-Chairman Philip Skawski and John Cam County Treasurer The Derbyshire RBL County Conference 2014 was held at Wirkworth Townhall on 8th February attended by 1Guest Speaker, 17 Delegates, 23 Visitors, 22 Officers/County Committee, 1 Women’s Section, 3 Standard Bearers and 2 Conference Committee making 69 people. The Standards were paraded on and the Act of Homage and Kohima Exhortation were pronounced. County Chaplin Rev Dr Jocelyn Lewis led the conference in prayers. After the welcome by Mr T. Hall Chairman of Wirkworth Branch, the County President Bill Else gave his address in which he mentioned the work by Legion Members in the County and thanked them for their hard work for Welfare and the Poppy Appeal. In place of the Chairman’s Address, Bill Parkin member of the Board of Trustees gave us the Corporate Message which included Property trusts and why at the moment they are frozen while a survey is carried out. He also gave us an update of the way Welfare is being delivered following “Pathway for Growth” Jessica Lee MP told conference the Parliamentary Under-Secretary for Defence Anna Soubry who is also MP for Broxstowe has particularly welcomed the new Ambassador role in the Legion and has promised to work with the Legion in promoting WWI commemorations as well as our welfare work.
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire's Anti-Poverty Strategy 2014-2017
    Derbyshire’ s Anti-Poverty Strategy 2014-2017 Working together to tackle poverty in Derbyshire A guide to this strategy Introduction Outlines the approach the partnership will take to reduce, and mitigate the impact of poverty in Derbyshire over the next three years. Background and the national context Gives an overview of the national context and background. Poverty in Derbyshire Provides an overview of poverty in Derbyshire and the challenges that the county currently faces. Partnership principles Sets out the overarching principles which will apply to, and guide, all areas of work. Addressing the challenges Summarises the four key challenges for Derbyshire and outlines the existing plans and identified actions which will drive forward work across the county over the next three years. Cross cutting partnership priorities Outlines the cross cutting priorities for action which will be the focus of partnership effort and resource moving forward. 2 Introduction Working together to tackle poverty in Derbyshire is not new. There is a wealth of action and work already taking place through a range partnerships and agencies such as the Financial Action and Advice Derbyshire Partnership, the Local Authority Energy Partnership and Public Health partnerships, aimed at improving financial inclusion and capability, reducing fuel poverty and reducing health inequalities. However, the recent economic downturn, the rising costs of goods and services and extensive welfare reforms present significant challenges for partners at a time when public services across the county are facing significant cuts to their budgets. This strategy sets out the approach that we will take to tackle poverty across the county against a backdrop of reducing public sector resources and a growing demand for services.
    [Show full text]
  • The Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy Regulation 22 Statement of Consultation
    The Local Plan Part 1: Core Strategy Regulation 22 Statement of Consultation December 2013 This page is intentionally blank 2 Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Regulation 18 – Summary of the Main Issues Raised 2 2.1 Background 2 2.2 Summary of comments from the public 3 2.3 Summary of comments from Parish/Town Councils 53 2.4 Summary of comments from Borough/County Councillors/MP 64 2.5 Summary of comments from neighbouring local authorities 82 and Derbyshire County Council 2.6 Summary of comments from national bodies 96 2.7 Summary of comments from local groups 123 2.8 Summary of comments from developers, landowners 151 and consultants 3. Regulation 20 – Summary of the Main Issues Raised 202 Appendix A – Persons and bodies invited to make representations 234 under regulation 18 3 This page is intentionally blank 1. Introduction Under Regulation 22 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012, a local authority is required when submitting a local plan to produce a statement setting out: (i) which bodies and persons the local authority invited to make representations under regulation 18, (ii) how those bodies and persons were invited to make representations under regulation 18, (iii) a summary of the main issues raised by the representations made pursuant to regulation 18, (iv) how any representations made pursuant to regulation 18 have been taken into account; (v) if representations were made pursuant to regulation 20, the number of representations made and a summary of the main issues raised in those representations; and (vi) if no representations were made in regulation 20, that no such representations were made.
    [Show full text]
  • 10/02/2021 MEMBERS INTERESTS Page 1
    MEMBERS INTERESTS 11/09/2021 ID SURNAME CODE PLACE NAME DATES 0014 Archbold NBL Embleton 1840 0014 Bingham NTT North Wheatley 1700 0014 Fletcher / Fruchard LND London 1700 0014 Goodenough SOM Norton St Phillip 1800 0014 Hardy NTT South Wheatley 1700 0014 Holdstock KEN Canterbury 1700 0014 Holdstock LND London 1800 0014 Lines BKM Marsworth 1800 0014 Neale HRT Barley 1700 0014 Robertson AYR Ayrshire 1800 0014 Steedman NTT North Leverton 1700 0014 Whitby CAM Arrington 1800 0014 Windmill SOM Prudsford 1800 0033 Bettney DBY Derbyshire Any 0033 Bettney NTT Nottinghamshire Any 0033 Storey GBR United Kingdom Any 0033 Twells GBR United Kingdom Any 0034 Baggaley NTT Mansfield pre 1800 0034 Quibell NTT Ragnall pre 1800 0034 Quibell NTT Darlton pre 1800 0034 Quibell NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1800 0109 Askey NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1850 0109 Askey STS Staffordshire pre 1850 0109 Beardall NTT Bestwood 1688+ 0109 Beardall NTT Hucknall 1688+ 0109 Beardall NTT Linby 1688+ 0109 Bird LEI Worthington 1857+ 0109 Butler NTT Hucknall Any 0109 Cadwallender GLS Gloucestershire pre 1850 0109 Cadwallender NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1850 0109 Camm NTT Widmerpool 1800+ 0109 Clarke NTT Linby 1750+ 0109 Fox LEI Wymeswold Any 0109 Fox NTT East Leake Any 0109 Harby NTT Nottinghamshire Any 0109 Haskey NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1850 0109 Haskey STS Staffordshire pre 1850 0109 Hayes NTT Nottinghamshire pre 1700 0109 Kem LEI Grimston pre 1800 0109 Kem NTT Widmerpool pre 1800 0109 Kirkland NTT Linby 1700+ 0109 Parnham NTT Bingham 1700+ 0109 Potter NTT Linby 1700+ 0109 Rose NTT Bulwell
    [Show full text]
  • Derbyshire. Derbyshire
    506 FAR DERBYSHIRE. I FA1UlERs-continued. r ~Iarshnd EiHodghey,Whitle, Stockprt MelIor Joseph Euxton &; Samuel Bux- Margerison Mrs.H.Gt.Barlow,Chstrfld Marsland J. ShudehiU, Hayfield,Stkprt ton, Priestcliffe, Buxton Margerrison Mrs. M.Dronfield,Sheffid Marston William, Hognaston, Ashborne Mellor Buxton William, Black Harry Marlow :Mrs. A. Lon2' EataIl R.S.O Mart George Thomas, Twyford farm, Stony Middleton, Sheffield ' Marlow W. H. Whitwell, Chesterfield Turnditch, Derby MelIor Charles, Abbotside, Earl Stern.. Marple A. HolIoway, Matlock Bath Martin C. The Moor,Chaddesden,Drby dale, Buxton Marple Thomas. Bradley, Ashborne Martin Herbert, Morley, Derby Mellor Charles, Carsington, Wirkswrtb Marples Herb~rt &I Paul, Huggister, Martin Walker, Smalley, Derby MelIor Mrs. EIizh. Moor, Wirksworth Norbriggs, Chesterfield Maskery Joseph, Shirley, Derby Mellor George. Over Haddon, BakeweU Marples William &I James, Grange, Maskery Thomas, Butlers hole, Maple- MelIor J. Barmoor, Peak Forest, Stlrpt Great Barlow, Chesterfield ton, Ashtborne Mellor J. T. White Lea, Chapel-en-le- Marples Edmund, Curbar, Sheffield Maskery William, Shirley, Derby Frith, Stockport Marples Frederick A. Middle Handley, Mason Mrs Ada, The Poplars, Over· Mellor James, Taddington, Buxt<lB Handley, Chesterfield seal, Ashby-de-Ia-Zouch Melior John, Brand, Hartington Upper Marples Henry,· Moorside, Cromford, Mason .Alfred, Broomhill lane, Whit- Quarter, Ashborne Matlock Bath tington, Chesterfield Mellor John, Comesdale, Peak Forest, Marples Jas. Cromford, Matlock Bath Mason Miss Ann, Cutthorpe,Chesterfld Stockport Marples P. Duke st.Staveley,Chestrfld Mason Arthur, Foolow, Eyam,Sheffield MelIor John, Earl Sterndale, Buxton Marples William, Eyam, Sheffield Mason G. W. Stony Middleton, Shffid Mellor Johln, Troway, Chesterfield Marples William, Nether Chander hill, ~fason .Tohn, Postern, Derby MelIor J.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Discontent in Derbyshire 1830·1850
    RURAL DISCONTENT IN DERBYSHIRE 1830·1850 Alan Frank Jones Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Sheffield January 2004 ii Alan Frank Jones RURAL DISCONTENT IN DERBYSlllRE 1830-1850 ABSTRACT Social protest, especially in agricultural regions, has occupie~ and caused considerable debate among, historians for many years. This thesis seeks to add to this debate, by looking at various forms of protest in Derbyshire between 1830 and 1850. This thesis examines three aspects of criminal activity: poaching, arson and animal maiming. It contends that none of these crimes can simply be categorised as acts of protest. In conjunction with an investigation of these three crimes, acts of protest such as strikes and episodes of reluctance to conform are also discussed. It argues that the motives behind various criminal activities and anti-authority behaviour were varied and complex. Arson and animal maiming were rarely co-ordinated, mostly they were individual attacks. However, on a few occasions both arson and animal maiming were directed against certain people. In the instances of poaching, there were more proven cases of gang participation than in either arson or animal maiming, with groups of men raiding game preserves. However, the great majority of raids were individual undertakings. What is more, poaching was carried out on a greater scale throughout the county than either arson or animal maiming. This thesis seeks to put these activities into the context of economic and social change in Derbyshire between 1830 and 1850. It maintains that there was a breaking down of the old social order.
    [Show full text]
  • Al Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.263 O
    :al Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.263 o LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COiVavlISSION FOR ENGLAND ' ' • REPORT NO.263 o LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUMDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN • . ' Sir Edmund Compton GCB KBE. ' DEPUTY CHAIRMAN ' '- . Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS - ' ' • Lady Bowden . .- " . Mr J T Brockbank . • • - Professor Michael Chisholm Mr R R Thornton CB DL Sir Andrew Wheatley CBE - \ \ To the Rt Hon IJerlyn Rees, HP. " Secretary of State for the Home Department PROPOSALS FOH THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE AlEBER VALLEY DISTRICT OF DERBYSHIRE 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried " out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the district of Amber Valley, in accordance withihe requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(l) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 19 August 1974 that we were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the Amber Valley District Council, copies of which were circulated to Derbyshire / County Council, Parish Councils and Parish Meetings in the district, the Members of Parliament for the-'constituencies concerned and the headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of the local newspapers circulate. „• in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announc.-.! the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public and from interested bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Erewash in Derbyshire
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE FUTURE ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR EREWASH IN DERBYSHIRE Report to the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions November 1998 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND This report sets out the Commission’s final recommendations on the electoral arrangements for Erewash in Derbyshire. Members of the Commission are: Professor Malcolm Grant (Chairman) Helena Shovelton (Deputy Chairman) Peter Brokenshire Professor Michael Clarke Pamela Gordon Robin Gray Robert Hughes Barbara Stephens (Chief Executive) ©Crown Copyright 1998 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Local Government Commission for England with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. ii LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page LETTER TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE v SUMMARY vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 3 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 7 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 9 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 11 6 NEXT STEPS 21 APPENDIX A Final Recommendations for Erewash: Detailed Mapping 23 LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND iii iv LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND Local Government Commission for England 24 November 1998 Dear Secretary of State On 2 December 1997 the Commission began a periodic electoral review of Erewash under the Local Government Act 1992. We published our draft recommendations in June 1998 and undertook a ten-week period of consultation.
    [Show full text]