EIS 1284 Vol 1 Iis}5Zsii Proposed Continuation of Quarrying
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
EIS 1284 Vol 1 iIS}5ZsII Proposed Continuation of Quarrying, Landfilling and Site Rehabilitation at Horsley Park, Fairfield Enviornmnetal Impact Statement May 1997 NSW IEPT PRIMARY INSTRIES Enviroguard PGH COMMUNITY WASTE MANAGEMENT 1cj]ji4 I IjI1,' L PROPOSED CONTINUATION OF QUARRYING, LANDFILLING AND SITE REHABILITATION AT HORSLEY PARK, FAIRFIELD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME ONE JUNE 1997 CMPS&F Environmental 67 Albert Avenue Chatswood NSW 2067 Tel: (02) 9412 9999 Fax: (02) 9412 9876 ACN 000 912 630 Proposed Continuation of Quariying and Site Rehabilitation at I-Iorsley Park, Fairfield - Environmental Impact Statement by CMPS&F Environmental COPYRIGHT Copyright 1997 CMPS&F Pty Ltd and CSR Ltd. All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing, with an acknowledgment of the source, for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted or stored in a retrieval system without written permission. Inquiries should be addressed to CMPS&F Pty Ltd. QUALITY ASSURANCE CERTIFICATION This document has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Quality Assurance System of CMPS&F Eastern Region, a Quality Endorsed Company in accordance with AS9001, Lic. Q EC 2353/01 Standards Australia. ISBN 0 646 32007 610 foo Printed on Recycled Paper Proposed Continuation of Quarrying and Site Rehabilitation at Horsley Park, Fairfield - Environmental Impact Statement by CMPS&F Environmental NOTICE TO ALL READERS This Environmental Impact Statement ([IS) consists of 2 volumes. Volume 2 contains all of the appendices. The [IS is prepared and placed on public exhibition for the purpose of allowing all persons who have an interest in the project the opportunity to obtain whatever information they require on the project, its benefits and its effects. Persons wishing to make comment, criticise, query or support the proposal should write a submission and post it to Fairfield City Council by the date nominated in the advertisement in local papers. Further information on any aspect of the project can be obtained by contacting CMPS&F Environmental, Environmental Assessment Division, on (02) 941 2-9888 or CSR on (02) 9372- 5896. Proposed Continuation of Quarrying and Site Rehabilitation atl-Jorsley Park, Fairfield - Environmental Impact Statement by CMPS&F Environmental TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i - iv 1. SUMMARY 1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW 1 1.2 THE PROPONENT 2 1.2.1 Monier PGH Holdings Ltd 2 1.2.2 Enviroguard 3 1.3 STATUTORY PROCEDURES 4 1.4 REVIEW OF QUARRYING ACTIVITIES 5 1 .4.1 Clay/Shale Extraction 5 1 .4.2 Clay Product Manufacture 6 1 .4.3 Existing Suppliers 7 1 .4.4 Need for Continued Quarrying 7 1 .4.5 Importance of the Site 8 1.5 REVIEW OF WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES 8 1.5.1 Waste Minimisation Act 8 1 .5.2 Waste Definition and Characteristics 9 1 .5.3 Sources of Waste 10 1 .5.4 Waste Disposal in Western Sydney 12 1.5.5 Expected Waste Quantities for PGH Horsley Park 12 1.5.6 Waste Minimisation in Relation to Enviroguard's Operations 14 2. THE PROPOSAL. 15 2.1 OUTLINE OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 15 2.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE PROPOSAL 18 2.3 SITE LAYOUT PLANS 18 2.3.1 General Arrangement 18 2.3.2 Site Infrastructure 19 2.4 QUARRYING AND LANDFILL OPERATIONS 21 2.4.1 Introduction 21 2.4.2 Overall Staging 21 2.4.3 Quarry Operations 22 2.4.4 Landfill Operation and Establishment 23 2.4.5 Traffic Generation 26 2.4.6 Environmental Management Measures 26 2.4.7 Water Management 32 2.4.8 Monitoring Programme 42 2.5 SITE REHABILITATION, CLOSURE AND END USE 43 2.5.1 Introduction 43 2.5.2 Closure of the Site 44 2.5.3 Landscape Proposals 45 2.5.4 Future Uses of the Site 46 2.5.5 Site Management 46 Proposed Continuation of Quarrying and Site Rehabilitation at Horsley Park, Fairfield - Environmental impact Statement by CMPS&F Environmental 2.5.6 Post Closure Monitoring 47 2.6 ERSKINE PARK EXAMPLE 47 2.6.1 Background to Erskine Park 48 2.6.2 Management Details 49 2.6.3 Community Involvement 49 2.6.4 Summary 50 THE LOCATION 51 3.1 PLANNING CONTEXT 51 3.1 .1 State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs) 51 3.1.2 Regional Planning 52 3.1.3 Local Planning 55 3.1.4 Previous DevelopmentApprovals 58 3.2 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 58 3.2.1 Property Details 58 IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITISATION OF ISSUES 60 4.1 OVERVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGY 60 4.2 REVIEW OF RELEVANT SOURCES OF INFORMATION 60 4.3 OUTCOME OF CONSULTATION WITH STAKEHOLDERS 61 4.4 OUTCOME OF THE PROCESS 66 4.4.1 Introduction 66 4.4.2 Key Issues 67 THE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES 68 5.1 AIR QUALITY 68 5.1.1 Climate 68 5.1 .2 Existing Environmental Conditions 68 5.1 .3 Detailed Analysis of Potential Impacts 70 5.1 .4 Proposed Mitigation, Management and Monitoring 71 5.2 TRANSPORT AND TRAFFIC ISSUES 72 5.2.1 Existing Transport/Traffic Conditions 72 5.2.2 Existing Intersection Performance 75 5.2.3 Accident History 78 5.2.4 Analysis of Potential Transport Impacts 79 5.3 NOISE ISSUES 83 5.3.1 Background 83 5.3.2 Existing Acoustical Environment 84 5.3.3 Analysis of Potential Impacts of the Proposal 86 5.3.4 Proposed Mitigation Measures 87 5.3.5 Noise Issue Summary 88 5.4 ECONOMIC IMPACTS 88 5.5 LAND/STRATEGIC PLANNING ISSUES 89 5.5.1 Geology, Soils and Surface Characteristics 89 5.5.2 Land Use/Zoning 91 5.5.3 Analysis of Potential Impacts of the Proposal 92 5.5.4 End Use of the Site 93 Proposed Continuation of Quartying and Site Rehabilitation at Horsley Park, Fairfield - Environmental Impact Statement by CMPS&F Environmental 5.6 ENERGY AND UTILITY SERVICES ISSUES 94 5.6.1 Existing Energy and Utility Services Provisions 94 5.6.2 Energy Requirements 94 5.6.3 Assessment of Efficiency of Energy/Utility Use 95 5.6.4 Consideration of Alternatives 96 5.6.5 Greenhouse Gas Implications 96 5.7 WATER ISSUES 97 5.7.1 Existing Water Environments 97 5.7.2 Analysis of Potential Impacts of the Proposal 100 5.7.3 Proposed Mitigation, Management and Monitoring 101 5.8 SOCIAL ISSUES 103 5.9 VISUAL IMPACTS 104 5.9.1 Existing Visual Environment 104 5.9.2 Analysis of the Potential Impact on the Visual Environment 104 5.10 HAZARDS, RISKS AND HEALTH ISSUES 107 5.10.1 Identification of Potential Hazards 107 5.10.2 Proposed Mitigation, Management and Monitoring 108 5.11 HERITAGE ISSUES 109 5.11.1 Sites or Relics of Heritage Significance (Aboriginal or Non-Aboriginal) 109 5.11 .2 Assessment of Significance and the Potential Impact of the Development 110 5.11.3 Proposed Mitigation Measures 111 5.12 FLORA AND FAUNA 111 5.12.1 Existing Environment 111 5.12.2 Analysis of Potential Impacts of the Proposal 113 5.12.3 Proposed Mitigation, Management and Monitoring 114 5.13 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSAL 114 LIST OF APPROVALS AND LICENCES 116 MEASURES PROPOSED TO MITIGATE ADVERSE EFFECTS 117 7.1 INTRODUCTION 117 7.2 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES 117 7.3 LANDFILL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (LEMP) 119 JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROPOSAL 123 8.1 SUMMARY 123 8.2 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 123 8.3 BIOPHYSICAL CONSIDERATIONS 124 8.4 ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY 124 8.5 CONSIDERATION OF ALTERNATIVES AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE PREFERRED OPTION 125 8.5.1 Site Selection and the DUAP Guidelines 125 8.5.2 Alternatives 129 8.6 SECTION 90 CONSIDERATIONS 130 8.7 CONCLUSION 134 Proposed Continuation of Quarrying and Site Rehabilitation at Horsiey Park, Fairfield - Environmental Impact Statement by CMPS&F Environmental APPENDICES [ALL OF THE APPENDICES TO THIS [IS ARE CONTAINED IN VOLUME 21 APPENDIX A REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AFFAIRS AND PLANNING APPENDIX B RESOURCE AND QUALITY INVESTIGATION APPENDIX C RESPONSES FROM PUBLIC AUTHORITIES APPENDIX D COMMUNITY CONSULTATION APPENDIX E DUST ASSESSMENT APPENDIX F NOISE ASSESSMENT APPENDIX G DLEMP AND TECHNICAL REPORTS APPENDIX H ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORTS APPENDIX I FLORA AND FAUNA REPORT APPENDIX J CLAUSE 50 CERTIFICATION APPENDIX K STUDY TEAM Proposed Continuation of Quarlying and Site Rehabilitation at Horsley Park, Fairfield - Environmental Impact Statement by CMPS&F Environmental liST OF FIGURES 1.1 SITE LOCATION 1.2a SITE 12b SITE IN RELATION TO ADJOINING PROPERTIES 1.3 EXISTING SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS 2.1 PROPOSAL OUTLINE 2.1a STAGING: EXISTING AND STAGE 1 2.1b STAGING: STAGES2 AND 5 2.1c STAGING: STAGES1O AND 17 2.1d STAGING: STAGE 18 AND FINAL CONTOURS 2.1e LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN 2.2a SUMMARY OF SITE ACTIVITIES 2.2b INDICATIVE SITE LAYOUT DETAILS (STAGE 2) 2.3 EXTRACTION AND LANDFILLING PROGRAMME 2.4 MAIN FEATURES OF A SOLID WASTE LANDFILL 2.5 LANDSCAPED MOUNDS 3.1 ZONING (FAIRFIELD LEP 1994) 3.2 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS 4.1 COMMUNITY CONSULTATION 5.1 DUST MONITORING SITES 52a POTENTIAL ROAD/JUNCTION IMPROVEMENTS 5.2b(i) INTERSECTION DETAILS (PCUS) 52b(ii) INTERSECTION DETAILS (VEHICLE TYPES) 5.2(c) DAILY TRAFFIC GENERATION 53 NOISE RECEIVER LOCATIONS 5.4 REGIONAL SETTING 5.5a INDICATIVE SOIL PROFILES 5.5b BOREHOLE SITES 5.6 ADJOINING PROPERTIES (LAND USE) 5.7a RECEIVING WATERWAYS 5.7b SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 5.7c TYPICAL SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT DESIGN DETAILS 5.8a MAJOR VIEWING POINTS 5.81)(0-0ii) EXISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT 5.9a HERITAGE - DISTRICT 5.9b HERITAGE - LOCAL 5.1Oa FLORA 5.10b FAUNA Proposed Continuation of Quarrying and Site Rehabilitation at Horsley Park, Fairfield - Environmental Impact Statement by CMPS&F Environmental LIST OF TABLES 1.1 SUMMARY OF SITE MATERIALS 1.2 TOTAL SOLID WASTE QUANTITY GENERATED IN LIKELY CATCHMENT AREA (TONN ES/YEARS) 1.3 EXISTING SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS AND TRANSFER STATIONS WESTERN SYDNEY.